Which two of these statements explains how can international trade agreements lead to economic growth

Black death leads to better conditions for the poor by empowering workers and providing more people job opportunities, living conditions are improved.

Agricultural workers were able to demand better payment and conditions from their manorial lords.

What is black death?

It was a bubonic plague pandemic that struck in Europe and in the north africa in the mid 1300s.

Bubonic plague is an infection which is caused by a bacterium yersinia pestis spread mostly to humans by infected fleas that travel on rodents.

Black rats were the most common at the previous generation which carried the bacteria and caused the plague.

Black death brought changes of European life  in the following areas:

Hence due to this pandemic in europe leads to many positive changes by the government and leaders.

Learn more about black death from the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/954651?utm_source=android&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=question

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is Cannon.

Explanation:

The Ottoman Empire actually were the first people to use Gunpowder, which they used to break down the wall to Constantinople.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

B. Cannon

Explanation:

The stories in the reading all warn against selfishness in different ways. For example, the legend of the river that became angry and flooded the land because a selfish man refused to share its water with others shows the consequences of not considering the needs of others. The legend of the chief who was punished for hoarding all the food in his village illustrates how selfishness can lead to the suffering of others.

In Plateau society, selfishness was seen as harmful because it goes against the values of cooperation and generosity that were important to the community. In a society that relied on sharing resources and working together for the common good, being selfish could jeopardize the wellbeing of the entire community. Furthermore, selfishness is a destructive trait that can lead to conflict and strife within a society. By warning against selfishness, these stories likely served as a reminder to be considerate and generous towards others.

Texas joined the Union as the 28th state on December 29, 1845. Texas was formerly a part of Mexico, but it became a sovereign nation in 1836. since achieving independence

Texas has pushed for annexation by the US ever since gaining its independence. However, because of political disagreements regarding slavery, the procedure took over 10 years. Texas joined the country as a slave-owning state, legalized it, and then seceded 15 years later to form the Confederate States of America. The Confederacy broke apart from the United States soon after Abraham Lincoln was elected in order to keep slavery people of African .

learn more about Texas here:

https://brainly.com/question/12153172

#SPJ4

Answer:

A common misconception that people have about history is related to Athenian Democracy.

Explanation

Most people know that democracy was born in the Ancient Greek city of Athens, and when they first hear the world "democracy", they think that their democracy was similar to the democracy we have today.

But the truth is that Athenian democracy was very different. As you research more about this historical period, you understand that democracy in Athens was very limited: only wealthy men had democratic rights, and participated in a form of direct democracy. The rest of the population: poor men, women, and slaves, did not have political rights, and were not part of that democracy.

:

Answer: A huge trade network of roads has been created.

Explanation:

The trade pattern formed by a large network of trade routes The Olmecs contributed to massive trade. That was the basic pattern of Olmec's economy. With the formation of these trade routes, it was created by connections with remote regions of Mesoamerica. The Olmecs were skilled craftsmen. Their pottery, statues, and figures were in high demand. However, these were not the only products that were traded intensively. The construction of trade routes led to the strong development of trade and the exchange of material goods.

Francisco Goya's nineteenth-century print "I Saw This" serves as a commentary on the horrors of war. The print depicts a scene of a man lying on the ground, surrounded by several other men, who appear to be soldiers.

The man on the ground is wounded, with blood pouring from his head, and his face is contorted in agony. The soldiers around him seem indifferent to his suffering, and one of them is even smoking a pipe. The print is a powerful critique of the violence and cruelty that often accompany war, and it raises important questions about the ethics of military conflict. The title of the print, "I Saw This," suggests that Goya himself witnessed a scene similar to the one depicted in the print. This personal connection adds to the emotional impact of the work, and it underscores the artist's commitment to social justice and human rights. Goya was known for his strong political views, and his work often reflected his concern for the welfare of ordinary people. "I Saw This" is a prime example of this commitment, and it remains a powerful reminder of the devastating consequences of war.

Learn more about Francisco Goya's here

https://brainly.com/question/4004372

#SPJ11

Answer:

D on E.D.

Explanation:

Speaking different languages meant people from different areas could no longer communicate easily with each other.

After the fall of the Roman Empire, the spread of new languages exacerbated Europe's division.

People from different places could no longer easily converse with each other because of the diverse languages they spoke. Therefore, choice (E) is the appropriate one.

Civil wars and political struggles significantly weakened the Roman Republic, the predecessor state of the Roman Empire. Julius Caesar was made dictator perpetuo Latin for "dictator in perpetuity" in the middle of the first century BC. He was slain in 44 BC.

Civil warfare and bans persisted, ultimately leading to Octavian's victory over Mark Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. The Hellenistic period, which had started with Alexander the Great's conquests in the 4th century BC,

came to an end the following year when Octavian overthrew the Ptolemaic Kingdom in Egypt.

Learn more about Roman Empire, from :

brainly.com/question/11415671

#SPJ7

Yes, the pairs of events cited below are independent. In each case, apply the fair-test process to support your answer.Pairs of events are independent if the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of the occurrence of the other.

Therefore, if we assume that all households are independent, then the pairs of events cited below are independent. a. It is given that each household has a probability of 4/9 of having a dog independent of whether another household has a dog. Therefore, we can apply the multiplication rule of probability to find the probability that all four households have a dog:P(D) = P(D_1 and D_2 and D_3 and D_4) = P(D_1) * P(D_2) * P(D_3) * P(D_4) = (4/9)^4 = 256/6561 ≈ 0.039b.

The probability that at least one of the households does not have a dog is equal to 1 minus the probability that all four households have a dog:P(not D) = 1 - P(D) = 1 - 256/6561 ≈ 0.961B. We need to know the values of P(B), P(AB), and P(A and not B) to find P(A).Given that P(A) = 23, we can find P(A and B) using the formula:P(AB) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A or B)P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(AB) = 23/100 + 17/100 - 45/100 = -5/100 (which is impossible)Therefore, the given information is inconsistent and we cannot find P(A and B) or P(A and not B).

Learn more about fair-test process here:https://brainly.com/question/30749010

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is B, at this point some people were for slavery and others work. Everybody had different opinions and so it cause division.

Answer:

The answer is C.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!!!!

Answer:

D: A car

Explanation:

heavier objects are more resistant to change, therefore have more inertia

John Calvin's core beliefs include predestination, salvation by faith alone, and biblical authority. He agreed with Luther on his rejection of papal authority but disagreed on the nature of the Eucharist.

John Calvin, a key figure in the Protestant Reformation, had core beliefs that revolved around the concept of predestination, biblical authority, and the idea of ​​salvation by faith alone. Calvin and Luther agreed on important theological aspects such as the rejection of papal authority, emphasis on Scripture as the supreme authority, and belief in salvation by faith.

However, they disagree on the nature of the Eucharist, especially the concept of Christ's presence. Calvin advocates symbolic presence, while Luther believes in a more literal presence known as oneness. 

Learn more about predestination:

https://brainly.com/question/18460867

#SPJ4

While many white men in the colonies lacked the right to vote, they influenced public life by, " forming the American party to settle tax disputes with Britain."

The white men in America formed the American Party in 1969. This party began as part of the American Independent Party and became the American Party at a convention attended by representatives from 37 states.

In the early history of the U.S., some states allowed only white male adult property owners to vote, while others either did not specify race, or specifically protected the rights of men of any race to vote. Women were largely prohibited from voting, as well as men without property.

Many members from the American Party, felt that they should not pay taxes to British, because these were passed in England by Parliament and not by their own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights. Thus, they started to resist by boycotting, or not buying, British goods.

Hence, the white men formed the American Party to settle tax disputes with Britain.

To learn more about the American Party here:

https://brainly.com/question/1213881

#SPJ4

Hey there!

What are you referring to? What are you discussing? Which war are you trying to find the cause of?

The fact that is left out of this account, and most clearly suggests bias, is option A. The governor supported the law, but the law was passed before she became governor.

By omitting this crucial piece of information, the account creates a biased narrative that blames the governor for the perceived problem of the increasing number of deer in state parks. The statement implies a cause-and-effect relationship between the governor's support of the law against hunting and the current situation, suggesting that her actions directly led to the "price" the state is now paying.

However, if it were mentioned that the law was already in place before the governor assumed office, it would provide a different context and undermine the implicit criticism of the governor's decision. It would highlight that the governor's support of the existing law was not the direct cause of the perceived problem, as she did not have control over its enactment.

Including this omitted information would present a more balanced account, allowing readers to consider other factors that may have contributed to the increase in the deer population. It would encourage a more comprehensive understanding of the situation and prevent the reader from forming a biased judgment solely based on the information provided. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

know more about judgment here:

https://brainly.com/question/730438

#SPJ8

"The Marbury v. Madison decision allowed the courts to strike down laws that were unconstitutional." changed the balance of power in American government during Jefferson's presidency, So, option (d) is suitable.

American courts have the authority to invalidate laws and statutes that they judge to be in violation of the U.S. Constitution according to the precedent-setting Marbury v. Madison case from the U.S. Supreme Court, which established the notion of judicial review in the country. Marbury, which was decided in 1803, is thought to be the single most significant case in American constitutional law. Defining the line between the executive and judicial branches of the federal government, which are constitutionally separate, was made easier by the Supreme Court's landmark decision, which established that the U.S. Constitution is actual law and not just a statement of political principles and ideals.

Early in 1801, as a result of the political and intellectual conflict between departing President John Adams and new President Thomas Jefferson, the matter was first brought to light. Jefferson had defeated Adams in the 1800 U.S. presidential election. Adams appointed a number of Federalist Party members to new circuit judge and justice of the peace positions in March 1801, just two days before his presidency came to an end, in an effort to annoy Jefferson and his supporters in the Democratic-Republican Party.

To know more about, Marbury v. Madison, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/11982017

#SPJ1

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The majority of wildfires in the world occur on the East Coast of the United States.

= False

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer:

Hey mate.....

Explanation:

This is ur answer.....

The culture of Saudi Arabia is defined by its Islamic heritage, its historical role as an ancient trade centre, and its Bedouin traditions. The Saudi society has evolved over the years, their values and traditions from customs, hospitality to their style of dressing, are adapting with modernization. The cultural aspect of Saudi Arabia is represented in the following:

Depth of its civilization that dates back to more than one million years, which is confirmed by the archaeological evidence and the heritage prevalent in this country.

It was the land of many kingdoms and states that prevailed in the evolution of human civilization.

Its distinguished geographical location made it a point of intersection of international trade routes through all the ages.

Being the cradle of Arabism and Islam and the country of The Two Holy Mosques.

Being a crossroads of cultures and a bridge for cultural communication.

Hope it helps!

Mark me brainliest pls.....

Follow me! :)

Among the weapons and technology employed by both sides during the Russo-Japanese War were magazine rifles, machine guns, and huge siege guns.

These weapons marked a significant shift from previous warfare tactics and technology, and the Russo-Japanese War is often considered one of the first modern wars. The widespread use of magazine rifles, which allowed soldiers to fire multiple rounds without reloading, led to changes in infantry tactics and contributed to higher casualty rates. The use of machine guns, which could fire hundreds of rounds per minute, made advancing across open ground even more dangerous. The use of huge siege guns, such as the Japanese 11-inch howitzer, also changed the nature of warfare, allowing armies to bombard cities from a distance. Overall, the weapons and technology used in the Russo-Japanese War foreshadowed the devastating weapons and tactics that would be employed in the world wars that followed.

Learn more about Russo-Japanese War here: brainly.com/question/3222503

#SPJ11

During the Russo-Japanese War, both sides employed a variety of weapons and technologies, including magazine rifles, machine guns, and siege guns. The war, which lasted from 1904 to 1905, was fought between the Russian Empire and the Empire of Japan, and was primarily fought over territorial disputes in East Asia.

Magazine rifles were used extensively by both sides during the war. These rifles allowed for quick and efficient reloading, which greatly increased the rate of fire compared to earlier models. Machine guns were also employed, which were capable of firing hundreds of rounds per minute and were particularly effective in defensive positions. Finally, huge siege guns were used by both sides to breach fortifications and other defensive positions, and were especially effective in destroying enemy fortifications. Overall, the use of these weapons and technologies had a significant impact on the course of the war, as they greatly increased the efficiency and effectiveness of both sides.

Learn more about Russo-Japanese War here: brainly.com/question/3222503

#SPJ11

Answer:

look it up

Explanation:

Answer:

Alexander Hamilton was a founding father of the United States, who fought in the American Revolutionary War, helped draft the Constitution, and served as the first secretary of the treasury. He was the founder and chief architect of the American financial system

because hitler hated the bolsheviks but the living space or "lebensraum" that he spoke of in his book "Mein Kampf" was only the territories that they had lost in the first world war thanks to the treaty of versailles.

The opium wars between England and China during the nineteenth century were battled by the English to help drug smugglers.

First Opium War (1839-1842) was a battle between China and England, in light of England's unlawful bringing of opium into China from India, causing boundless habit. It was set off by the Chinese government's mission to authorize its disallowance against opium dealing by English shippers.

The Opium Wars emerged from China's endeavors to stifle the opium exchange. Unfamiliar merchants (principally English) had been wrongfully sending out opium essentially from India to China since the eighteenth 100 years.

Learn more about opium wars:

https://brainly.com/question/9369488

#SPJ4

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:

The opium wars between britain and china in the mid-nineteenth century were fought by the british in order to what?

Answer:

Women should be allowed to vote using the first amendment because laws affect women just as much as men.

I don't really have much to say, lol.

Answer:

In East Asia, China was the big power upon European arrival. China used a protectorate system for trade in which  small Asian countries,  Japan in particular, would bow to the Chinese in exchange for protection and trade. This shows submissive action to a stronger power and represents respect to that said power.

Britain had desires to open trade with China since it was the main mission of exploration in the 15th century. They hoped to gain access to the valuable goods within China but to not pay the high prices they had trading through the Ottomans. As with all of China's trade partners, they expected a sign of respect shown to the emperor before trade could officialy start. The British traveling group, were asked to bow in front of the emperor in order to seal that deal. The envoy refused as they would only bow to their own king. Based on that Britain got thrown out of China (for the time being ) in aspects of trading .

Answer:

it required congressional approval for the commitment of troops overseas

Explanation:

The war powers act of 1973 changes the powers of the presidency as it required congressional approval for the commitment of troops overseas.

How did the Conflict Powers Demonstration of 1973 change the powers of the administration?

It specifies the president should advise Congress in something like 48 hours of military activity and denies military from staying for over 60 days.

Progressively after some time, presidents have utilized their one-sided abilities, including chief orders, decides that sidestep Congress yet have the power of regulation on the off chance that the courts don't topple them.

It conceded the president ability to sanction military regulation in crisis circumstances. It denied the president from arranging economic agreements with fighting countries. It required legislative endorsement for the responsibility of troops abroad.

Learn more about Conflict Powers Demonstration here:
https://brainly.com/question/29353221
#SPJ1

The US-led coalition removed the Taliban government from power in Afghanistan after the September 11, 2001, attacks.

After the September 11, 2001, attacks, there were significant developments and changes in various aspects of domestic and international affairs. Here are some key events and outcomes that occurred following the attacks:

United States Response: The U.S. government launched the "War on Terror" under President George W. Bush's administration. The primary focus was on eliminating terrorist networks, particularly Al-Qaeda, the group responsible for the attacks. The U.S. military and intelligence agencies conducted military operations in Afghanistan and later Iraq, seeking to remove the Taliban regime and dismantle Al-Qaeda.

Invasion of Afghanistan: In October 2001, the U.S. and allied forces launched Operation Enduring Freedom, invading Afghanistan to oust the Taliban regime. The military campaign aimed to disrupt Al-Qaeda and prevent Afghanistan from becoming a safe haven for terrorists.

To know more about military campaign, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30465740

#SPJ11