Which of the following statements best describes the relationship between both the arbitral proceedings and then out settlements D . Arbitration ensures that a resolution will be reached outside of court.
What else does adjudication mean in practice?Arbitration is a method of resolving a dispute without going to court. You are known as the claimant, and the person or entity you are suing is known as the respondent. You both present your argument to an impartial third party known as an arbitrator.
With an example, what is arbitration?Arbitration is a type of ADR, or Alternative Dispute Resolution. Deeply confused parties make their leadership roles to a neutral neutral third party who renders a binding and final judgement on the conflict. It is more structured than settlement conferences or mediation, but much less formal than court hearings.
To know more about arbitration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29559567
#SPJ1
Answer:
D. Arbitration guarantees that a settlement will be reached out of
court.
Explanation:
Which constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws?
Supremacy Clause
Habeas Corpus
Elastic Clause
Ex Post Facto
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answer:
doctrine of preemption
Explanation:
Under the doctrine of preemption, which is based on the Supremacy Clause, federal law preempts state law, even when the laws conflict.Jun 2, 2017
"Supremacy Clause" constitutional provision forbids conflict between state and federal laws. Correct option is a.
The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, and it states:
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, federal laws, and treaties take precedence over any conflicting state laws. This ensures that there is uniformity in the application and enforcement of federal laws across all states and prevents conflicts or inconsistencies between state and federal regulations.
To know more about constitutional:
https://brainly.com/question/4555568
#SPJ6
Corporate social responsibility advocates argue that ethical guidance for corporate managers may come from:
Corporate social responsibility advocates argue that ethical guidance for corporate managers may come from values.
What is corporate social responsibility?Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a type of international private business self-regulation that tries to support charitable, activist, or philanthropic social goals by participating in or encouraging volunteer work or other morally upstanding behaviors.
A management concept known as "corporate social responsibility" encourages businesses to incorporate social and environmental considerations into their daily operations and relationships with stakeholders.
In this case, Corporate social responsibility advocates argue that ethical guidance for corporate managers may come from values.
Learn more about Social responsibility on:
https://brainly.com/question/1373962
#SPJ1
janet is called for jury duty and is selected for possible service on a jury. however, when the defendant's attorney sees her, he notices that she is wearing a green dress. both the defendant and the defendant's attorney hate green dresses, so they strike her name from the jury. this is:
What is the best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab?
Answer:
The best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab would be through personal delivery. Shipments through mail may be lost or misplaced, causing a contamination of the evidence and rendering it useless. The safe transportation of the evidence to a crime lab can only be assured through personal delivery.
The primary purpose of a(n) ________ is to hear the formal information or indictment and to allow the defendant to enter a plea.
The primary purpose of a(n) arraignment is to hear the formal information or indictment and to allow the defendant to enter a plea.
The primary purpose of an arraignment is to hear the formal information or indictment and to allow the defendant to enter a plea. It is an essential part of the judicial process.
An arraignment is a crucial part of the judicial process, which occurs after the arrest of a suspect. In this process, the defendant appears before the judge to hear the charges that have been brought against them by the prosecution.
They are also given the opportunity to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. The court is responsible for ensuring that the defendant understands their charges and the potential consequences of their plea.
When a defendant is brought before the court, they are informed of their charges and the rights they are entitled to under the Constitution. They are given the chance to seek legal representation or request a court-appointed attorney if they are unable to afford one. Additionally, they are informed of their rights to a speedy and public trial, the right to remain silent, and the right to confront their accuser.
In conclusion, arraignment is a vital part of the legal process that ensures that the defendant understands the charges and their rights under the law. It also allows them to enter a plea and seek legal representation. The arraignment process aims to ensure that the judicial process is conducted fairly and that the defendant's rights are protected.
Learn more about Constitution from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ11
what are the difference between civil law and criminal law?
any 8 points
Answer:
Civil law deals with the disputes between individual citizens, organizations, and government agencies, in which compensation is awarded to the victim. Examples are defamations like libel and slander, breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.
Criminal law deals with crime and the legal punishments that come with a criminal offense. A criminal prosecution involves the government deciding weather to punish and individual for either and act or an omission.
The heir of a large estate will be of legal age within 30 days. He lists for sale with a broker one of the properties held by the estate. The broker knows of a buyer for the property and sells it within 24 hours of listing, with closing to be in 45 days. The listing and sales agreement are
fulfilled, executed, voidable or executory??
Based on the given scenario, the listing and sales agreement can be considered executed. This is because the broker was able to find a buyer for the property within 24 hours of listing it for sale, and the heir has agreed to sell the property.
The terms of the agreement have been established, including the closing date which is 45 days from the date of sale. However, it is important to note that the agreement may also be considered executory since the closing date is still in the future and the buyer has not yet taken possession of the property. This means that both parties have obligations that need to be fulfilled before the agreement can be fully executed. It is not considered voidable as both parties have agreed to the terms and conditions of the agreement, and there is no indication that any fraudulent or illegal actions were taken during the transaction.
To know more about buyers
https://brainly.com/question/906651
#SPJ11
the practice established for individuals deemed a threat to society or likely to flee is:
The practice established for individuals deemed a threat to society or likely to flee is commonly known as "pretrial detention" or "remand."
In this practice, individuals are held in custody pending trial based on the belief that they pose a risk to public safety or may attempt to evade the legal process.
Pretrial detention aims to ensure the defendant's presence in court, protect the community, and maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system.
However, it is important to balance the presumption of innocence and the right to liberty with the need for public safety, as excessive or unjustified pretrial detention can lead to infringements of individual rights.
For more such questions on remand, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/30555280
#SPJ11
Why is the same event sometimes reported differently by various news agencies. Some news agency embraced certain political beliefs which are reflected in the reporting Journalist sometimes you're not good enough information to acculate your port on an event Some news agencies have strong interesting misleading their audiences Political parties pay some news agencies to make them look good which leads to inaccurate reporting
The reason the same event is sometimes reported differently by various news agencies is due to various factors including political beliefs, availability of information, misleading interests, and inaccurate reporting.
Below is a detailed explanation of each factor:
1. Political beliefs: News agencies can embrace certain political beliefs, which are reflected in the reporting. Some news agencies may be biased towards a particular political party or ideology, leading to differences in reporting. This can be a result of personal beliefs of the journalists or ownership interests.
2. Availability of information: Sometimes, journalists do not have enough information to accurately report on an event. This can lead to different reports from different news agencies. For example, one news agency may have more access to sources and therefore provide a more comprehensive report than another news agency.
3. Misleading interests: Some news agencies have strong interests in misleading their audiences, which can lead to inaccurate reporting. This may include sensationalizing stories, presenting false information, or presenting one-sided views of events.
4. Political parties pay some news agencies to make them look good, leading to inaccurate reporting. Some political parties may pay certain news agencies to present them in a favorable light, leading to biased reporting and inaccurate representation of events.
Learn more about political ideology at:
https://brainly.com/question/18702218
#SPJ11
Freedom of speech allows all of the following EXCEPT
O criticizing the government.
criticizing the actions of a neighbor.
telling lies that may badly harm another person.
delivering a speech in public.
The government form that provides notice to the alien of the pending immigration removal charges filed against him/her is called:
Answer: Notice to Appear (NTA) policy memorandum (PM) (PDF, 599.37 KB) providing guidance on when USCIS may issue Form I-862, Notice to Appear. An NTA is a document that instructs an individual to appear before an immigration judge. This is the first step in starting removal proceedings against them
What rule allows local prosecutors to charge Keith with first-degree murder? If you were the prosecutor, discuss why you think you'd be successful prosecuting using this rule.
Hello. You did not report the case Keith is involved in, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
Generally speaking, a prosecutor can use the felony murder rule to prosecute someone as possibly guilty of a first-degree murder. This is because the felony murder rule states that there are murders that occur accidentally, or during dangerous activities, and these murders are classified as first-degree murder.
Which country has the highest proportion of women serving in its national legislatures?
a. Sweden
b. US
c. Japan
d. Germany
e. Canada
the country with the highest proportion of women serving in its national legislature is Sweden. So, option A is accurate.
A national legislature, also known as a national parliament or a national assembly, is the highest representative body or legislative branch of a country's government. It is responsible for making and passing laws, representing the interests of the people, and providing oversight of the government's activities. The composition and structure of national legislatures can vary from country to country, but they generally consist of elected representatives who represent different regions or constituencies within the country.
Sweden has been a leader in gender equality and women's representation in politics, consistently ranking among the top countries in terms of women's participation in the national parliament. It is worth noting that the representation of women in legislatures can change over time, so it's always recommended to refer to the latest data for the most accurate information.
To know more about national legislature
brainly.com/question/29795145
#SPJ11
identify the constitutional clause that is common to both united states v. nixon (1974) and marbury v. madison (1803).
The Supremacy Clause plays a crucial role in ensuring that the Constitution and federal law are the supreme law of the land and that they are upheld and enforced.
The constitutional clause that is common to both United States v. Nixon (1974) and Marbury v. Madison (1803) is the Supremacy Clause. The Supremacy Clause is found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, and it establishes that the Constitution and federal laws are the supreme law of the land, which means that state laws cannot conflict with them.
In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court relied on the Supremacy Clause to establish the principle of judicial review, which gives the court the power to strike down laws that are unconstitutional. This landmark decision set the precedent for the court to interpret and uphold the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.
In United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court relied on the Supremacy Clause to order President Nixon to turn over audio tapes of conversations related to the Watergate scandal, which were essential evidence in a criminal investigation. The court ruled that the president was not above the law and that the Constitution and federal law must be respected and upheld.
To learn more about Supremacy Clause
https://brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
Provide at least two of the arguments in favor of capital punishment and two of the arguments against capital punishment. Which argument do you think is most persuasive and why?
Two arguments in favor of the need for capital punishment are:
It acts as a deterrent for serious crimes It prevents the chance that the offender commits the crime againTwo arguments against capital punishment are:
It is irreversible which is bad if the person was found to be innocent later It is inhumaneThe argument that is subjectively more persuasive is the argument for capital punishment.
What are reasons to support or be against capital punishment?A reason to support capital punishment is that it acts as a deterrent for serious crimes such as murder. If people know that they will be executed for murder, they are less likely to commit it. The death penalty also prevents the chance that the same crime will be committed by the offender. This is because the offender will never be released to commit the same crime.
An argument against the death penalty however, is that it is irreversible. This is very bad because there is a chance that the person was innocent and executing them means they'd never be freed. The death penalty is also quite inhumane because it involves taking someone's life.
However, if the death penalty serves as a deterrent enough, it will save human lives which makes it subjectively better.
Find out more on capital punishment at https://brainly.com/question/19238585
#SPJ1
Written by Alexander Hamilton the the merits of the Electoral College.
THE mode of appointment of the Chief Magistrate of the United States is almost the only part of the system, of any consequence, which has escaped without severe censure, or which has received the slightest mark of approbation from its opponents. The most plausible of these, who has appeared in print, has even deigned to admit that the election of the President is pretty well guarded.1 (Links to an external site.) I venture somewhat further, and hesitate not to affirm, that if the manner of it be not perfect, it is at least excellent. It unites in an eminent degree all the advantages, the union of which was to be wished for.
According to Hamilton, the Electoral College will....
A) Protect America from poor leadership.
B) Protect America from foreign armies.
C) Educate citizens on the election process.
D) Protect the Judicial Branch from the Executive Branch
Answer:
I think it is C
Explanation:
Sorry if I'm wrong-
What is the impeachment process and removal for federal officials according to the united states constitution?.
The constitution requires a -thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached respectable upon conviction is elimination from the workplace.
In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from protecting public offices inside the destiny. There may be no enchantment.
Article II, phase 4: The President, vice chairman, and all civil officials of the usa, shall be removed from the workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or different excessive Crimes and Misdemeanors. See, e.g., Va.
The constitution offers the residence of Representatives the only energy to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the only court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is confined to elimination from the workplace but also offers a means by which an eliminated officer may be disqualified from preserving future office.
Learn more about constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
critical criminologists believe that criminology should be expanded to include study of the injustices and social harms perpetrated by those who hold power. group of answer choices a)True b)False
The statement is true. Critical criminologists believe that criminology should be expanded to include the study of injustices and social harms perpetrated by those in positions of power.
Critical criminologists advocate for a broader understanding of criminology that goes beyond the traditional focus on street crime and individual offenders. They argue that the field should encompass the examination of systemic injustices and social harms committed by powerful individuals and institutions. This perspective seeks to analyze the structural and societal factors that contribute to crime and deviance, including the role of power dynamics, social inequalities, and oppressive systems.
Critical criminologists emphasize the importance of studying white-collar crime, corporate misconduct, state violence, institutional discrimination, and other forms of harm perpetrated by individuals and entities with power and influence. They highlight how these acts can have significant social, economic, and political consequences, yet often go unnoticed or receive less attention compared to street-level offenses.
Expanding the scope of criminology to include the study of injustices and social harms perpetrated by the powerful aligns with a critical perspective that challenges existing power structures and seeks social justice. It recognizes the need to analyze and address the crimes and harms that occur within societal institutions and power dynamics, in addition to examining individual criminal behavior.
Learn more about Critical criminologists here: https://brainly.com/question/32764138
#SPJ11
The maximum fine for a first non-driving alcohol-related offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor is.
Where would you find the liquor licensing rules for each state and territory
Answer:
I would find the liquor licensing rules for each state and territory mainly in Australia.
Explanation:
Legal drinking age – you must be 18 or older to buy alcohol or to drink alcohol in a licensed venue. Selling alcohol – it's illegal to sell alcohol to anyone under 18 or to someone who is already drunk. Labelling – all packaged alcohol must show how many standard drinks it contains.
a defamation suit for a famous person is harder to win than a defamation suit for a regular person. true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A defamation suit is the act of attacking one's reputation, although someone could defame someone, it isn't easy to prove for non famous people, as they wouldn't have to worry about being affected Income-wise or in General, although it's an unfair assumption, our criminal justice systems do has it's flaws.
What is the name of the legal principle that "ensures that the judicial system is the same for every defendant?"
Answer:
Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge's personal views.
Explanation:
This is Ethics class question.
How does the legal inequity of America's past affect inequity
that remains across ethnic lines today? please answer it in essay
form and cited it.
The racial inequality that was prevalent in America's past has remain across the ethnic lines of today and we can see from the incidents from the various incidents that took place in America. Even though great leaders have fought for the inequality still we could identify such acts for instance during the George Floyd's case.
Racial inequality in a society refers to the unequal distribution of resources, power, and economic opportunity across races. While the discussion of racial inequality in the United States is often focused on economic inequality, racial inequality manifests itself in a variety of ways that impact the well-being of all Americans both individually and collectively. This includes disparities in wealth, education, employment, housing, mobility, health, incarceration rates, and other areas.
Learn more about inequality, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28774329
#SPJ4
Which area of Texas has the largest concentration of unions?
a. Gulf Coast
b. East Texas
c. Central Texas
d. the Mexican border
In Texas, the area with the largest concentration of unions is the Gulf Coast region (option A). This area includes major cities like Houston and Beaumont, which are centers of the state's petrochemical industry.
The petrochemical industry is a major employer in this region, with a significant number of workers in chemical plants, refineries, and other related industries. These workers are often represented by labor unions that negotiate with employers for better wages, benefits, and working conditions. In addition to the petrochemical industry, the Gulf Coast region is also home to a number of other industries, including healthcare, education, and hospitality. Unions in these industries have also been active in the region, advocating for better working conditions and wages for their members. While union membership in Texas is relatively low compared to other states, the Gulf Coast region has historically been a stronghold for labor unions. In recent years, however, the region has seen a decline in union membership as industries have become more automated and outsourced, and as anti-union sentiment has grown among some employers and lawmakers.
To know more about such labor unions, click here : https://brainly.com/question/14506392
#SPJ4
What Supreme Court case finally placed movies on the same footing as books and newspapers in terms of protection under the First Amendment?
The Supreme Court case that finally placed movies on the same footing as books and newspapers in terms of protection under the First Amendment is "Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson" (1952).
This landmark decision played a significant role in extending First Amendment protection to motion pictures and solidifying their status as a form of expression deserving constitutional safeguards.
In "Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson," the Supreme Court held that movies were a form of communication protected by the First Amendment. The case revolved around a film distributor, Joseph Burstyn, Inc., that was denied a license to exhibit the film "The Miracle" in New York due to its alleged sacrilegious content. The Court ruled that the state's censorship of the film violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments, emphasizing that movies, like other mediums of expression such as books and newspapers, were entitled to constitutional protection.
This decision marked a significant shift in the legal treatment of movies and recognized their artistic and communicative value. It established the principle that movies should enjoy the same level of protection as other forms of expression under the First Amendment. "Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson" helped pave the way for the artistic freedom and societal impact that movies continue to have today, reinforcing the importance of free speech in the United States.
learn more about Amendment here; brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ11
Why are literary techniques used in speeches?
A. They can create an emotional response in the listener
B. They make the speaker sound more intelligent
C. They make the speech appeal to educated people
D. They make the speech more poetic and interesting
Answer:
Why are literary techniques used in speeches?
Explanation:
I would say D.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I just took the midterm and that is what they say the correct answer is
Edie files a suit against Frank. If this suit is like most cases, it will be
a. dismissed during a trial.
b. dismissed or settled before a trial
c. resolved only after a trial.
d. settled at a trial
In a typical legal case where Edie files a suit against Frank, it is likely that the case will be dismissed or settled before a trial takes place. Option B is correct.
This is because the majority of legal cases are resolved through settlements or dismissals rather than going to trial. Settlements occur when the parties involved negotiate an agreement to resolve the dispute without going to trial. Dismissals can happen for a variety of reasons, such as lack of evidence, procedural errors, or voluntary dismissal by the plaintiff.
Trials are usually seen as a last resort, as they can be time-consuming and expensive for all parties involved. Additionally, trials can be unpredictable, and the outcome is ultimately in the hands of a judge or jury. Overall, the legal system aims to resolve disputes in the most efficient and fair manner possible, and settling or dismissing a case before a trial is often the preferred method.
Option B holds true.
Learn more about legal cases: https://brainly.com/question/26718803
#SPJ11
Public Administrators often have what interaction
with civilians?
A. administer punishments for them
B. do not engage with them much
C. work face to face
how fairly can a national cake be shared?
The national cake should be shared in a way that benefits all citizens, regardless of their social, economic, or political status.
National Cake and how it can be shared fairlyThe fairness of sharing a national cake depends on various factors, including the size of the said cake, the number of people who need to share it, and the distribution of resources and wealth in the country. Ideally, a national cake should be shared in a way that benefits all citizens, regardless of their social, economic, or political status.
One approach to sharing the national cake fairly is to use progressive taxation, where the wealthy pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes than those with lower incomes. This helps to ensure that the burden of supporting the country's infrastructure, services, and programs is shared more equitably. Additionally, the government can invest in programs that support the most vulnerable populations, such as education, healthcare, and affordable housing, to help reduce inequality and provide opportunities for all citizens to succeed.
However, the reality is that in many countries, the national cake is not shared fairly.
Some factors impeding on the fair sharing include:
Corruptionpolitical favoritismand economic inequalityThese can all contribute to a situation where certain groups receive a disproportionate share of the national wealth. In such cases, it is important for citizens to engage in activism and advocacy, to hold their elected officials accountable and push for reforms that promote fairness and equality.
Learn more about corruption here https://brainly.com/question/472198
#SPJ1
Which of the following is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case?
O It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts
O It may be the basis for establishing facts in a later civil case
O It will occur as a part of the trial portion of a criminal prosecution
O It is legally equivalent to a “no contest” plea
The one that is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts. Hence, the correct answer is option A
A criminal case is the one that is liable to sentence punishment. A case that is punishable under law of any country. Hence, one is set to be in a criminal case when one is involved in any form of crime. The severity of the crime determines the gravity of the punishment.
What does guilty plea mean?To plead guilty implies that one accepts that one did the crime charged. If one pleads guilty, the court will decide what should happen next, which could be a fine or a prison sentence.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts.
learn more about guilty plea: https://brainly.com/question/14334271
#SPJ1