Which statement best completes the diagram?
Cause
?
Effect
Ashoka decides to
promote Buddhist ideals
in the Mauryan Empire.
A. Ashoka the Great meets with Alexander the Great.
B. Ashoka the Great leads an extremely bloody battle.
C. Ashoka the Great is defeated by Buddhist armies.
D. Ashoka the Great sends representatives to foreign countries.
SUBMIT

One thing that made foreign goods more expensive and allowed for Northern goods to be competitive was  d. the 1812 ban of imports.

In the War of 1812, the Americans were at war with the British and so were not buying their products.

As Britain was a major trading partner, this allowed the North to fill in the gap by producing their own goods which became more competitive.

Find out more on the War of 1812 at https://brainly.com/question/14301560.

#SPJ1

Answer:

Fire is another important symbol of Zoroastrianism, as it represents light, warmth and has purifying powers. Some Zoroastrians also recognize the evergreen cypress tree as a symbol of eternal life.

Explanation:

Based on the historical perspective, the correct answer goes thus:

Approximately 72% of all American casualties resulted from the sinking of the U.S.S. Arizona.

In conclusion, we can conclude that the correct answer is 72%.

Learn more about Arizona attack here: https://brainly.com/question/19819303

Explanation:

By claiming that Nature intended all civilizations to be the universal divisions of civilization, Mazzini criticized the aristocracy. By firmly rejecting the Empire, Mazzini emphasizes Italian patriotism and the moral rebirth of man. The patriarchal monarchy was seen by Mazzini as the manifestation of dictatorship.

Answer:merchants and sailors both had to use the ocean for travels

Explanation:

it was mutually beneficial because the sailors knew the patterns of the wind and the merchants had goods in exchange for directions and stuff

Answer: maybe D

Explanation:

Based on the given scenario, the Fed is trying to:

Decrease the amount of money that banks have to lend: Increasing interest rates can make borrowing more expensive for banks, which in turn reduces the amount of money they have available to lend.

Reduce the amount of available credit: By increasing interest rates, the Fed aims to discourage borrowing and reduce the overall availability of credit in the economy.

Discourage consumer borrowing by increasing interest rates on loans: Higher interest rates on loans make borrowing more expensive for consumers, which can discourage them from taking on new debt.

Therefore, the correct options are:

Decrease the amount of money that banks have to lend

Reduce the amount of available credit

Discourage consumer borrowing by increasing interest rates on loans

Answer:

Uniting upper and lower Egypt together.

Explanation:

King Narmer's greatest accomplishment was uniting the two parts of Egypt which were the upper and lower parts of Egypt. . There was a advancement in technology during this time.

Answer:

King Narmer's greatest accomplishment was uniting the two parts of Egypt land Upper and Lower Egypt. The thing that was expanded was the population. There was a advancement in technological during this time. Pharaoh Menes of Ancient Egypt had a polytheistic religions the time.

Explanation:

Answer: Ivan the Terrible

Explanation: Ivan the Terrible was named the first "Tsar of russia" in 1547

Answer:

Ivan the Terrible

Explanation:

Russian Ivan Grozny, byname of Ivan Vasilyevich, also called Ivan IV

Answer:

"Wild weeds are gathering on the wall"

Explanation:

Answer:

Here are some of the positives and negatives of Columbia's Exchange:

Positives:

Negatives:

Answer:

they are both planelts

Explanation:

Let assume the context is educational sector, the Federal government's role in education is to provide funding, set standards and requirements, and enforce civil rights protections to promote high-quality education for all students.

The Federal government in the United States offers a range of programs and initiatives in the education sector, with the aim of promoting high-quality education for all students.

Some of the key programs and requirements include:

Read more about education sector

brainly.com/question/8461796

#SPJ1

A general overview of the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations.

The United States' decision to join an international organization is typically influenced by a combination of political, economic, and strategic factors. Historically, the United States has been actively involved in various international organizations, such as the United Nations (UN), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), World Trade Organization (WTO), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and many others. Support for America joining an organization can come from different quarters.

It often depends on the perceived benefits and alignment of objectives. Supporters of U.S. inclusion may include policymakers, diplomats, internationalists, business leaders, and advocates of global cooperation. They believe that participating in international organizations allows the United States to promote its interests, exercise influence, foster diplomatic relations, and address global challenges through multilateral cooperation.

On the other hand, opposition to U.S. involvement in an organization can also exist. Critics may argue that membership could compromise national sovereignty, limit policy autonomy, or impose burdensome financial obligations. Opposition may come from political factions, isolationists, skeptics of international cooperation, or those who believe that the organization's agenda or actions contradict U.S. interests or values.

It is important to note that the specific political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the organization and the particular context surrounding U.S. involvement. the political background of the United States' inclusion in international organizations, considering some specific examples.

United Nations (UN): The United States played a pivotal role in the establishment of the UN in 1945 and has been a member since its inception. Supporters of U.S. membership emphasized the need for collective security, international cooperation, and the promotion of peace and stability.

They believed that active participation in the UN would enhance American influence, provide a platform to address global challenges, and safeguard U.S. interests. However, there have been critics who argue that the UN infringes on national sovereignty or that it is biased against U.S. interests, leading to occasional opposition from certain political factions.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): The United States was a founding member of NATO in 1949. Supporters of U.S. involvement saw NATO as a means to deter Soviet aggression during the Cold War, protect European allies, and promote stability in the region. NATO has generally enjoyed broad bipartisan support in the United States, with proponents highlighting its importance for transatlantic security cooperation.

However, some critics argue that NATO burdens the United States with disproportionate military and financial commitments, leading to occasional debates about the costs and benefits of U.S. participation World Trade Organization (WTO): The United States has been a member of the WTO since its establishment in 1995. Supporters of U.S. membership view the WTO as a vital platform for promoting global trade, reducing barriers, and resolving trade disputes. They argue that U.S. participation helps protect American businesses, ensure market access, and enforce fair trade practices.

Opposition to the WTO or specific trade agreements can arise from those who believe they negatively impact domestic industries or workers, leading to debates over trade policy and the balance between free trade and protectionism. It is important to note that the political background, supporters, and opponents can vary depending on the specific organization, geopolitical context, and prevailing domestic political dynamics. Different administrations or political parties may hold varying perspectives on the value of international organizations and their alignment with U.S. interests.

To know more about political background ,click

brainly.com/question/30687787

I think it is B. To punish former Confederates.

Answer: I think its B cause i had gotton a A on it

Explanation:

Answer:

The impact of living organisms traded between the Old and the New World.

Explanation:

Historian Alfred W. Crosby came with the term “Columbian Exchange” to describe the impacts of the living organisms begin in the 15th century. With the discovery of America, in 1492, led the beginning of the Exchange between two continents. There was an exchange of native animals, plants, and diseases moving back and forth across the oceans. Europeans made trading connections with the natives and established colonies. The invaders came in with infectious diseases in the New World, that led to the decline of the entire civilizations. The Native American died with coming connecting with chickenpox, smallpox, scarlet fever, cholera, malaria, measles, etc.

The general consequence of the spread of nationalism throughout the 20th century is Countries around the world began to respect human rights.

The notion and movement of nationalism asserts that the state and the country should coexist. As a political movement, nationalism frequently works to advance the interests of a particular country, especially when it comes to establishing and preserving that country's sovereignty over its own territory.

National consciousness—the understanding of a group of people or nation's sense of communality—is a prerequisite for nationalism. National heroes and national symbols are typically linked to an awakening of national awareness.

It promotes pride, unity, and a sense of identity. Hence, option B is a an appropriate response.

To learn more about nationalism

https://brainly.com/question/1018147

#SPJ1

Answer:

Chinese Civil War, (1945–49), military struggle for control of China waged between the Nationalists (Kuomintang) under Chiang Kai-shek and the Communists under Mao Zedong.

There were several states in the United States that did not have specific legislation on segregation during the Jim Crow era of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These states included California, Oregon. Nevada, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska.

Interestingly, many of these states had relatively small African American populations at the time, which may have contributed to their lack of segregation laws. Additionally, these states tended to have higher levels of education and were more urbanized than other areas of the country, which may have also played a role in their more progressive attitudes towards civil rights.

Therefore, the states that did not have segregation laws are California, Oregon. Nevada, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska.

Learn more about segregation, here:

https://brainly.com/question/19904337

#SPJ1

In the Ptolemaic Model, the earth was the realm of nature and man, but the celestial sphere with its "fixed" stars was the Sun.

This is known to be the Model of the universe where Ptolemy was siad to have  placed the Earth at the key point or main point of his geocentric model.

In the Ptolemaic Model, the earth was the realm of nature and man, but the celestial sphere with its "fixed" stars with different distances all appear to lie on the celestial sphere. The fixed star was the sun.

Learn more about Ptolemaic model  from

https://brainly.com/question/14703454

#SPJ1

Answer:

Norma Shields is a researcher investigating lifestyles of the rich and famous. This week she is examining her target audience's views on food, the...

Explanation:

Norma Shields is a researcher investigating lifestyles of the rich and famous. This week she is examining her target audience's views on food, the...

Martin Luther started the Civil Rights Movement to end the legal racial discrimination against African-Americans. For black Americans to receive equal legal protection in the United States, a social justice battle primarily took place in the 1950s and 1960s.

In the United States, the civil rights movement was a nonviolent social movement and campaign from 1954 to 1968, intending to end institutionalized racial segregation, discrimination, and racial disenfranchisement nationwide.

The contemporary civil rights movement started on December 1, 1955, when Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, was detained in Montgomery, Alabama, for refusing to sit at the back of the bus.

The civil rights movement is one of the most important movements in the United States and the rest of the globe. As a result, it served as an example for minorities around the globe. Discrimination is brutal and unfair, as demonstrated here, and it won't be tolerated anyplace in the nation.

Learn more about Civil Rights Movement here:

https://brainly.com/question/15728930

#SPJ3

Answer:

i believe its C

Explanation:

Each attracted a different set of followers. As conservatives, liberals, and radicals debated issues of government, a new movement of nationalism emerged. Believed in nationalism Liberal.

Patriotism refers to devotion to a specific area and entails social conditioning and private evaluations. Nationalism entails countrywide identity and an advanced feeling in the direction of one's personal kingdom.

Modern-day nationalism is primarily based on a combination of two developments: the Enlightenment idea of legitimate authorities being based totally on humans, and the romantic vision of subculture. Nationalism requires defining what the state is and who's in it. This will be completed by means of which includes certain humans, except for others.

From the late 18th century into the nineteenth century, a political concept is known as nationalism advanced. The nationalism definition in global records targeted societal team spirit around shared ethnic trends inclusive of language, beliefs, and traditions. This is known as classical nationalism.

Disclaimer: The question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.

Question: Mostly middle-class business leaders and merchants. They wanted to give more power to elected parliaments, but only the educated and the landowners would vote. In the first half of the 1800s, three schools of political thought struggled for supremacy in European societies. Each believed its style of government would best serve the people. Each attracted a different set of followers. As conservatives, liberals, and radicals debated issues of government, a new movement of nationalism emerged. believed in nationalism

Learn more about nationalism here https://brainly.com/question/1287645

#SPJ9

During much of the time before the Reformation, the Bible was only available in Latin, which most uneducated people could not read.

The Latin Bible was known as the Vulgate, and it had been the standard Bible used by the Roman Catholic Church since the fourth century. However, the majority of people in Europe during this time were illiterate, and even those who could read were often not fluent in Latin. As a result, the Bible was not accessible to most people, and the interpretation of Scripture was left to the clergy, who were educated and trained in theology.

This contributed to a general lack of knowledge among the laity about the contents of the Bible and the teachings of the Church, which in turn created a sense of dependency on the clergy and the Church hierarchy. Translating the Bible into vernacular languages played a key role in the Protestant Reformation, as it enabled people to read and interpret the Bible for themselves, leading to a greater emphasis on individual interpretation and a challenge to the authority of the Catholic Church.

To know more about the bible here

https://brainly.com/question/434489

#SPJ4

The information given illustrates that one would be outlined to regulation by the federal government. The court case that outlined this is the Gibbons V. Ogden case of 1824.

The 1824 Supreme Court decision in Gibbons v. Ogden established the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce in the country, superimposing itself on the rights and powers of the states in this regard.

It was a commercial dispute between two river route concessionaires, one of whom had a monopoly on the concession from the State of New York and the other had a permit issued by the Federal Government.

The Gibbons V. Ogden case was one in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that states could not interfere with the federal government's ability to regulate commerce in the country. In this case, Ogden had asked the court to prevent Gibbons from conducting commercial operations in state waters. He claimed to have sole ownership of the waters. This case demonstrated that the federal government wielded more power over the country's states.

Learn more about regulation on:

https://brainly.com/question/18701718

#SPJ1