Answers
Strict scrutiny is basically a standard review which is used by the Supreme Court for the discrimination cases that are based on the race or the ethnicity.
The correct option is option a.
Strict scrutiny is basically a form of judicial review which is used by the courts in order to determine the constitutionality of some particular laws. Strict scrutiny is most often used by courts when a particular plaintiff sues the government on the basis of discrimination which can be based on ethnicity or the race.
In order to pass the strict scrutiny, the legislature must pass the law to further a governmental interest and they must have narrowly tailored the law to reach to that interest.
Hence, the correct option is a.
To know more about Strict scrutiny
https://brainly.com/question/29793578
#SPJ4
Related Questions
1. Under current law, unreimbursed employment-related expenses
of employees are:
A) Not allowed as trade or business tax deductions
B) Always deductible for AGI
C) Limited to two percent of AGI
D) All
Answers
Under current law, unreimbursed employment-related expenses of employees are Limited to two percent of AGI. The correct option is C.
The current law generally places a cap on the amount that employees can spend on unreimbursed employment related expenses. Only the portion of these costs that exceed 2% of the person's adjusted gross income (AGI) is deductible. This means that the total of the unreimbursed expenses are not tax deductible if they do not exceed two percent of AGI.
The excess amount can be claimed as an itemized deduction on Schedule A of the person's tax return, though if the expenses go over this cap. It's important to keep in mind that recent changes to the tax code may have an effect on this provision so it's always advisable to seek specific advice from a tax expert or consult the most recent tax regulations. The correct option is C.
Learn more about adjusted gross income at:
brainly.com/question/1931633
#SPJ4
10. the federal government's practice of spending more than it takes in results in
a. greater dependence on regressive taxes than on progressive taxes.
b. deficit financing.
c. low interest rates.
d. longer fiscal years.
Answers
Deficit financing is the practice of the federal government spending more money than it collects in revenue.
What is federal Government's practice?The federal government practices a system of governance that relies on the rule of law, constitutionalism, and the separation of powers. This system is intended to promote a balanced and efficient system of governance while protecting individual liberties. The federal government practices a variety of policies, including providing services and assistance to citizens, regulating industries, collecting taxes, and setting laws. Additionally, it is responsible for protecting national security, managing foreign affairs, and promoting economic growth. The federal government also works with state and local governments to ensure the health, welfare, and safety of its citizens.
This is done to finance government projects and services, and can be offset by borrowing or creating new money. The result of this practice is an increase in the national debt, and a greater reliance on regressive taxes than on progressive taxes. Additionally, since the government is borrowing more money, interest rates tend to be lower than they would be without deficit financing. Lastly, the length of the fiscal year may be extended in order to accommodate the extra borrowing.
To know more about the federal
government's practice click-
https://brainly.com/question/12486516
#SPJ4
Which of the following provide guidance for users trying to understand unique governmental reporting issues?
A GASB Interpretations
B FASB Statements
C GASB Concepts Statements
D AICPA Audit Guides
Answers
The correct option is (C) which is GASB concept statements.
The United States state and local governments employ generally accepted accounting rules that were developed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. It is a private, non-governmental organization, like the majority of the organizations that contribute to the development of GAAP in the US.
The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), an independent, private organization with headquarters in Norwalk, Connecticut, was founded in 1984. It sets accounting and financial reporting standards for local and state governments in the United States that adhere to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
The GASB has released or will release several Concepts Statements. The purpose of concept statements is to offer a conceptual framework of interconnected goals and essential ideas that can serve as a foundation for setting uniform accounting and financial reporting standards.
To learn more about GASB, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29735977
#SPJ4
How is a person's legal standing defined by law?
Answers
Explain how ethical dilemmas are evaluated and resolved, what factors are involved?
Answers
Answer:
By mutual understanding and cooperation.
Explanation:
Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.
Under the drug supply chain security act (dscsa) manufacturers now have to have product id on products they distribute in the supply chain with no exceptions.
Answers
Answer:
The Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA), was enacted by Congress on November 27, 2013. Title II of DQSA, the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA), outlines steps to achieve interoperable, electronic tracing of products at the package level to identify and trace certain prescription drugs as they are distributed in the United States. This will enhance FDA’s ability to help protect consumers from exposure to drugs that may be counterfeit, stolen, contaminated, or otherwise harmful. These requirements will also improve detection and removal of potentially dangerous drugs from the drug supply chain to protect U.S. consumers.
Additionally, the DSCSA directs FDA to establish national licensure standards for wholesale distributors and third-party logistics providers, and requires these entities report licensure and other information to FDA annually.
Explanation:
In what situations would a case to be heard in federal court? 
Answers
Explanation:
bankruptcy cases would be heard in a federal court
Disadvantages of self-discipline
Answers
Answer:
* Too much discipline makes individuals in the school, college and the offices rebellious.
* Too much discipline generates a feeling of suppression by the superiors.
* Too much discipline may develop hesitation among students and colleges.
Explanation:
i hope it helpsDescribe the overall level of rights and freedoms, including economic freedom, each country grants its citizens.
(this is modern Japan I believe)
1. Japan:
Answers
Explanation:
Compared to other communist countries in the Asian region, Japan is relatively better in terms of the overall level of rights and freedoms it grants its citizens.
For example, its constitution recognizes and grants citizens the following rights/freedoms:
freedom of religionfreedom of speech and of the press freedom of peaceful assembly and associationIf we consider its stands on freedom of religion, Japan's constitution (article 20) explicitly stated that its citizens should not be "compelled to take part in any religious act, celebration, rite or practice."
Thinking about a felony (serious
crime, more than a year in prison) versus a misdemeanor crime (less serious crime,
less than a year in jail), how should the following scenario be classified and why.
Steve and Dan were riding and listening to LOUD music on the radio. Steve was the
driver and Dan was the passenger. Both men had at least one drink for dinner
FOUR hours earlier, Dan had three. An unidentified man ran the light causing Steve
to slam into his car totaling it. The unidentified man had severe bodily injuries and
was taken to the hospital. The police officer arrived to investigate the accident
and smelled alcohol on Dans breath and arrested BOTH men (Steve and Dan) and
charged them with a felony DUI (driving under the influence).
In YOUR opinion, was it fair to arrest BOTH men for DUI? Why or why not?
Should Steve be charged? Why or why not? Should the other driver be charged?
Why or why not? Could or should either be charged with a misdemeanor? Why or
why not?
Answers
Answer:
Based on the scenario provided, it is fair to arrest Steve only for DUI. The police officer smelled alcohol on Steve's breath, indicating that he was driving under the influence of alcohol. Steve was driving the car and was responsible for the safety of the passengers and other drivers on the road. Therefore, he should be charged with DUI.
The other driver who ran the red light cannot be charged with DUI as there is no evidence to suggest that he was driving under the influence of alcohol or any other substance. However, he could potentially face charges for causing the accident.
Whether the charge should be a felony or misdemeanor depends on the specific laws in the state where the accident occurred and the severity of the injuries sustained by the other driver. However, a felony charge is appropriate since the other driver sustained severe bodily injuries .
Overall, individuals must understand the potential consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. They should make responsible decisions to ensure their safety and the safety of others on the road.
Explanation:
Answer:
Based on the scenario provided, it is fair to arrest Steve only for DUI. The police officer smelled alcohol on Steve's breath, indicating that he was driving under the influence of alcohol. Steve was driving the car and was responsible for the safety of the passengers and other drivers on the road. Therefore, he should be charged with DUI.
The other driver who ran the red light cannot be charged with DUI as there is no evidence to suggest that he was driving under the influence of alcohol or any other substance. However, he could potentially face charges for causing the accident.
Whether the charge should be a felony or misdemeanor depends on the specific laws in the state where the accident occurred and the severity of the injuries sustained by the other driver. However, a felony charge is appropriate since the other driver sustained severe bodily injuries .
Overall, individuals must understand the potential consequences of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. They should make responsible decisions to ensure their safety and the safety of others on the road.
Explanation:
when it comes to drinking what is the buddy system?
Answers
A trucking company has clients that require them to deliver goods all over the
country. The company hires employees who live in various states and assigns
them delivery routes that allow them to be home as much as possible. One of
the drivers lives in a different state from where the trucking company is
located and feels that he is being denied benefits because of this. The
company says that the laws of their state do not require what the employee is
requesting. If the driver decides to pursue a legal case, which of the following
would most likely be true?
A. It is a matter of state law, and because the state laws might differ,
it is impossible to predict what the courts might decide.
B. The courts will likely end up requiring the governments of the two
states to change their laws so that they agree and do not
contradict one another.
C. The case would be heard in federal courts because the two parties
are from different states.
D. Because the driver is not from the same state as the company
itself, he is not allowed to bring a case against the company on
this matter.
Answers
It is a matter of state law, and because the state laws might differ, it is impossible to predict what the courts might decide is most likely to happen.
What is something the state government is responsible for?Defending individuals from neighbourhood dangers. Keeping up the legal system. Establishing regional governmental entities like counties and towns. Upkeep of state roadways and establishment of methods for controlling local roads.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about state government is responsible for, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2117668
#SPJ1
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
How have similar statements influenced modern congressional actions
A). Presidential impeachment
B). Presidential nomination
C) presidential election
D). Presidential veto
Answers
Answer:B). Presidential nomination
Explanation:
Answer:
A). Presidential impeachment
what social media platform is now the focus of a bill in congress that might essentially ban it because of its ability to gather data about those in the u.s. who use it?
Answers
The social media app TikTok is now the focus of a bill in congress that might essentially ban it because of its ability to gather data about those in the U.S. who use it. It has been accused of using its algorithm to track the activities of its users and then selling that data to third parties.
This bill is being introduced in response to growing concerns about the app's ability to gather data on users in the United States, and about how this data could be used to track and monitor individuals. The bill seeks to ban it from operating in the United States unless the company agrees to restrict its data collection practices and to increase the privacy protections available to American users.
In conclusion, the proposed bill in Congress highlights the increasing concerns over the collection and usage of user data by social media platforms.
To know more about privacy protections go to
https://brainly.com/question/30751214
#SPJ4
The claim (in law) that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way
Answers
The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."
What is the precedent claim?Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.
When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.
Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
Which governmental agency enforces laws that uphold truth in advertising?
Answers
The FTC's mission is protecting the public from deceptive or unfair business practices and from unfair methods of competition through law enforcement, advocacy, research, and education. Our work to protect consumers and promote competition touches the economic life of every American.
Case Study: ALS & ICE Bucket challenge
The purpose of this assignment is to address one or more public administration topics within the case, justify the analysis with relevant references, and make clear and reasonable recommendations.
Read the case study attached. Then, complete the following:
Problem Statement (about 200 words)
Key/Core problem identification in your own words
Analysis and Theory Application (about 500 words)
Specific external academic references to apply to identified problem
Must use a minimum of 5 external academic references
Recommendations (about 200 words)
1-2 specific recommendations
The problem statement, analysis and theory application, and recommendation should be in the context of public budgeting and finance.
The Case Study Analysis assignment must be cohesive, readable, and well-structured. It must be the student’s original writing (no block quotes)
Answers
Problem Statement The problem that is associated with the ALS & ICE Bucket challenge is a Public Administration problem.
This challenge involves a charitable movement that was initiated by ALS in the US. ALS disease is an illness that damages neurons that are responsible for voluntary muscle movements.
The disease causes muscle stiffness, weakness, and difficulty in moving. The initiative aimed at raising awareness about the disease and raising money to finance research on the cure for ALS.
This movement created a buzz on social media, especially after celebrities participated in the challenge.The major problem with this initiative was the use of the funds collected. The money was used for a wider range of purposes, not necessarily for finding a cure for the disease.
To know more about Public Administration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22972887
#SPJ11
Describe a time when you successfully argued a point of view and explain why you believe you were successful.
Answers
when I was not having my practice n.b and I explained my teacher but she didn't
then I call my mother and she told the same reason to her
As though teaching a class, explain mouth-to-mouth resuscitation in approximately 150 words.
Answers
Reanimation using mouth-to-mouth Breathe normally, then shut and seal their open mouth with yours before blowing into it briefly. When you breathe into their lips, their chest ought to clearly lift.
How can mouth-to-mouth resuscitation be started?Use the head-tilt, chin-lift method to widen the airway. Squeeze the nostrils tightly and place your mouth over the other person's to create a seal in order to breathe mouth-to-mouth. Before checking to see if the chest rises, perform a one-second rescue breath on the subject. If it rises, you should breathe out again.
What do you mean by mouth-to-mouth resuscitation equipment?a personal mouth-to-mouth resuscitation device. The device has a plastic film barrier, with a one-way valve covering their lips. on the victim's face, if possible.
To know more about Resuscitation visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/6335546
#SPJ1
a. Creative Commons (Public Copyright License) provides standard free of charge copyright licenses. From the lens of the copyright and fair use, explain:
- What is fair use? - Elaborate on four possible options in creative commons use? (1 Marks)
b. Regarding workplace issues:
List four-employee ethical roles and responsibilities for a workplace? (1 Marks)
- Explain two types of whistleblowing in the workplace? What condition/s allow an employee to acceptably whistleblow? (2 Mark)
c. Regarding censorship:
What is Internet censorship with one example? - To what extent internet censorship is effective? - Why (two reasons) conducting internet censorship gets challenging?
Answers
In Creative Commons, there are four possible options or licenses that can be applied to works:
1. Attribution (BY): This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the original work, even commercially, as long as they give appropriate credit to the creator.
2. ShareAlike (SA): This license allows others to distribute derivative works based on the original, even commercially, as long as they use the same license for the new work.
3. Non-Commercial (NC): This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the original work for non-commercial purposes only, without the need for permission from the creator.
4. No Derivatives (ND): This license allows others to distribute the original work, but they are not permitted to remix, adapt, or build upon it.
b. Four employee ethical roles and responsibilities for a workplace include:
1. Honesty and Integrity: Employees have a responsibility to act with honesty and integrity, being truthful and transparent in their actions and communication.
2. Respect and Fairness: Employees should treat others with respect and fairness, promoting a positive and inclusive work environment free from discrimination or harassment.
3. Confidentiality: Employees should respect and maintain the confidentiality of sensitive information or trade secrets obtained in the course of their work.
4. Compliance with Laws and Policies: Employees have an ethical responsibility to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and company policies, ensuring their actions align with legal and ethical standards.
Regarding whistleblowing, there are two types:
1. Internal Whistleblowing: This occurs when an employee reports concerns or wrongdoing within their own organization to someone within the company, such as a supervisor, ethics hotline, or designated compliance officer.
2. External Whistleblowing: This involves reporting concerns or wrongdoing to external entities outside the organization, such as regulatory agencies, law enforcement, or the media.
Acceptable whistleblowing typically involves situations where the employee has exhausted internal reporting channels, the concern involves serious violations of laws or regulations, there is substantial evidence to support the claims, and there is a reasonable belief that the organization will not address the issue appropriately or that retaliation may occur.
c. Internet censorship refers to the control or restriction of access to certain content, websites, or online activities by governments, organizations, or internet service providers. One example of internet censorship is the "Great Firewall of China," where the Chinese government restricts access to certain foreign websites and platforms.
The effectiveness of internet censorship can vary. While it can limit access to certain information or control the flow of content, determined users can often find ways to bypass censorship measures, such as using virtual private networks (VPNs) or proxy servers. Additionally, internet censorship can lead to unintended consequences, such as the stifling of free speech, infringement on human rights, and limitations on access to knowledge and information.
Conducting internet censorship can be challenging due to several reasons:
1. Technical Difficulties: With rapidly evolving technologies, it can be challenging to implement effective censorship measures that can keep up with various methods used to circumvent them.
2. Balancing Freedom and Control: Striking a balance between protecting public interests and individual rights can be complex, as censorship can infringe upon freedom of expression and access to information, leading to debates over what content should be restricted or allowed.
Which is the most accurate statement concerning the relationship between state and federal regulations
Answers
Answer:
The relationship between state and federal regulations in the United States is one of delegation and complement: in principle, the states are the holders of sovereignty and, therefore, possess all the rights and powers that they have not expressly delegated to the Federal Government to through the Constitution. In turn, in the event that the states have delegated prerogatives to the federal government, these may only be exercised by the federal government, and subsidiarily (and always in a complementary manner and respecting federal guidelines) by the states.
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
Answers
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
what is the answerrr
Answers
(Courts & Civil Liberties 04.01 MC) A federal case in Texas would began in a
Answers
Answer:
d. US Court of Appeals for Circuit Five.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. Texas trial court.
b. Texas court of last resort.
c. U.S. District Court for Circuit Five.
d. U.S. Court of Appeals for Circuit Five.
A federal case in Texas would most likely begin in a U.S. Court of Appeals for Circuit Five. This would be a federal appellate court, which would mean that the court would have appellate jurisdiction. The rulings that such a court makes may be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Fifth Circuit hears cases in the states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.
which law is unjust in South African law?and how can you change it
Answers
Answer:
A south African law that finds to be unjust is the blue black in discrimination where the Africans and Americans present in South Africa are still not treated equally.
Explanation:
The blue black in discrimination law has been passed to offer the equal rights between the Americans and the African people.
In 2016, sports newscaster Erin Andrews and former wrestler Hulk Hogan were both awarded substantial monetary damages after winning their respective cases involving invasion of privacy. It is believed that the juries in both cases wanted to sanction the defendants by sending a clear message that individual's privacy must be respected regardless of who they are. The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as:
Answers
Answer:
Punitive damages
Explanation:
Based on the information given the monetary damages that was awarded in these two cases are described as PUNITIVE DAMAGES reason been that we were told that the juries has the intention to sanction the defendants who is the person that was found guilty after been accused of committing a crime by sending a clearer message to the defendants that individual’s or people's privacy have to be respected regardless of who they are in order to serve as a lesson to the defendants and to others who may have the intention of committing the same crime and as well to punish the defendants for the crime that was committed by him or her just as in the case of both Erin Andrews and Hulk Hogan who were awarded monetary damages after winning their cases that involve the invasion of privacy.
Therefore The type of monetary damages awarded in these two cases are described as: PUNITIVE DAMAGES
why do drugs laws need to be amended?
Answers
The President nominates a judge to a federal court but the Senate does not confirm (approve) the appointment. This act serves as a check on which TWO branches of government? (CHOOSE TWO)
Answers
Answer:
Executive and Legislative (or vise versa)
Explanation:
Executive is the President. Executive enforces the laws. The President also appoints judges.
The Legislative such as The Senate and House of Representatives make the laws.
Therefore, This would be a check on these two branches of Government.
True or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
Answers
Answer:
True or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.
false
What is the correct definition of a tort?
Question 2 options:
a law designed to protect the property rights of all citizens
an injury or wrong that can be compensated with damages
a crime for which one can be imprisoned if found guilty
a special court for hearing cases involving personal injury
Answers
The correct definition of a tort is an injury or wrong that can be compensated with damages. Thus, option B is correct.
What is trot?The trot is a case that can be defined as a negligence change that a person has been doing with cost set and injury to another one or harmed another being in the process.
In this process, the government or the judicial system has made the person will be treated liable and have to compensate the other person for the damages that are being done to them. It basically includes any assault or damage to personal property. Therefore, option B is the correct option.
Learn more about tort, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14927068
#SPJ1