The standard that asks a judge to weigh the strength of the case by determining whether the prosecution has presented enough evidence at a preliminary hearing that could be sent to a jury at a real trial is called the probable cause standard.
Probable cause is a legal standard that requires a judge to determine if there is enough evidence in the prosecutor's case to justify proceeding to trial. At a preliminary hearing, a judge is asked to weigh the strength of the case by determining whether the prosecution has presented enough evidence that could be sent to a jury at a real trial.
A probable cause hearing is a preliminary hearing in which the prosecutor presents evidence to the judge to establish that there is enough evidence to support a reasonable belief that a crime was committed by the defendant. It is important to note that the probable cause standard is not a high standard, but rather, it is a low standard that is only meant to establish that there is enough evidence to support a reasonable belief that a crime was committed.
Learn more about probable cause https://brainly.com/question/28399684
#SPJ11
A photograph of blood splattered on the wall should be made with ----- view?
Answer:
A photograph of blood splattered on the wall should be made with medium-rage view.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
A buyer entered into a written contract with a seller to purchase his commercial property for $100,000. The contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed, and made no mention of easements or reservations. The closing was set for November 25, three months from the signing of the contract. Shortly thereafter, the buyer obtained a survey of the property, which revealed that the city had an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Because this actually enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not mention it to the seller. Subsequently, the buyer found a better location for her business. On November 1, the buyer notified the seller that she no longer intended to purchase the property. The seller told her that he intended to hold her to her contract. At closing, the buyer refused to tender the purchase price, claiming that the seller's title is unmarketable and citing the sidewalk easement as proof of that fact. In a suit for specific performance, will the seller likely prevail? A: Yes, because the contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed. B: Yes, because the buyer was aware of the visible easement and it enhanced the value of the property. C: No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders title unmarketable. D: No, because the buyer gave the seller sufficient notice of her change in plans and yet he made no effort to try to find another purchaser.
No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.
The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.
Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.
The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.
Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32959753
#SPJ11
Who does a jury consist of?
A.people who are not related to the case
B.friends and family of the defendant
C.supporters of the plaintiff
D.journalists and government officials
E.foreign legal experts and diplomats
Which of the following federal laws created Medicare and Medicaid? a. Social Security Act of 1935 b. Public Law 92-603 of 1972 c. Public Law 89-97 of 1965
Public Law 89-97 of 1965 federal laws created Medicare and Medicaid. The correct answer to the question is option C - Public Law 89-97 of 1965.
This federal law, also known as the Social Security Amendments of 1965, created both Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare is a federal health insurance program primarily for people aged 65 and older, as well as those with certain disabilities. Medicaid, on the other hand, is a joint federal-state program that provides health coverage to eligible low-income individuals and families. These programs have become critical sources of healthcare coverage for millions of Americans. It is important to note that while Medicare is funded entirely by the federal government, Medicaid is funded jointly by the federal and state governments. it is noteworthy to mention that Medicare and Medicaid have been expanded and modified several times over the years to better serve the changing healthcare needs of the population.
To know more about Security Act visit:
brainly.com/question/30459726
#SPJ11
There are so many criminal justice careers to choose from that it is hard to put them all into
words. For this activity, you will be writing not one poem but two. The first poem should be
about the criminal justice career you feel the most drawn to. The second one must be
written about the career you'd be least likely to pursue. Your poems can rhyme or not rhyme.
It can be a haiku or free verse.
First: Crime Scene Tech
Black Lights
Black Powder
Fingerprints and Hair
Gotcha Now'
Second: Law Enforcement
Flashing Lights
Ending Lives
Racially Broken System.
Life Ending Choice
Split Second Reactions.
Always Criticized.
it is to get behind the wheel with out thinking
Answer:
Highway hypnosis is the condition of when you drive/get behind the wheel without thinking or having proper consciousness.
Explanation:
Which situational condition decreases the chances of crimes?
O A.
ethnic heterogeneity
O B. Relative deprivation
O C. Ineffective schools
O D. Installation of security camera
Answer:
D: Installation of security cameras
Explanation:
Different between citizen and alien
Explanation:
A citizen is a permanent resident of a state, while an alien is a temporary resident, who comes for a specific duration of time as a tourist or on diplomatic assignment
The philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that society has a corrupting influence on a people and that it was the government's responsibility to protect the people from the ills of society by making laws that benefit the general population. Do you agree with Rousseau? Why or why not? Explain.
In which of the following situations is it legal to pass? A. The vehicle you want to pass is driving at or above the speed limit in front of you. B. You must cross a center line that's solid on your side and broken on the opposite side. C. You are in the middle of crossing a bridge that only has one lane each direction. D. You are on a straight road and can pass the car ahead under the speed limit.
Answer:
The correct answer would be (.D
Explanation:
Answer:
D. You are on a straight road and can pass the car ahead under the speed limit.
Explanation:
Considering critiques of human rights by cultural relativists and feminists, do you
believe human rights are universal? What critiques do you find most convincing
and why? Do you think universalists can respond adequately to these critiques?
Also, consider the disjuncture between human rights theory and practice, what
does this disjuncture means (if anything) for universalists?
Human Rights are universally declared to be equal for every person in any part of the world. This was stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
What is UDHR ?UDHR was adopted by UN General Assembly as the first legal document which was based on fundamental human rights being universal.UDHR's 30th article talks about the principle and building blocks of every current and future generation of human rights conventions, treaties, and other legal documents.This consists of basically reports such as:International covenant of civil and political International Bill of RightsThe principle of Universality is concerned with International Human Rights Duties. This means every human is equally treated under the eyes of the law.
LEARN MORE ABOUT Human rights :
https://brainly.com/question/3444313
#SPJ9
define the term advocacy and mention three reasons why protestors in an advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protest.
Advocacy refers to the act of publicly supporting a particular cause or issue, and protestors in advocacy campaigns should avoid using violence during their protests due to safety concerns, legal repercussions, and negative public perception.
Any action that promotes, urges, justifies, defends, or pleads on behalf of another person is referred to as advocacy.
What is Advocacy?Getting support from another individual to help you communicate your opinions and wishes and help you stand up for your rights is referred to as advocacy.
Your advocate is a person who supports you in this way. There are a number of reasons why protestors participating in an advocacy campaign should refrain from using violence. The three are security, legitimacy, and legality. By supplying policymakers with the data they need to make decisions and, in turn, influence legislation, advocates can have significant positive effects on the puiblic's health. Effective advocacy does not necessarily require protracted or complicated legislative procedure.
Therefore, we can conclude that advocacy is when person pleads on behalf of another.
Learn more about Advocacy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29639066
#SPJ5
1. After the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, African Americans continued to experience political and economic oppression mainly because
A. the amendments were not intended to solve their problems
B. many African Americans distrusted the federal government
C. Southern states enacted Jim Crow laws
D. poor communications kept people from learning about their legal rights
2. Sierra stands in line at her polling place to vote in the election. She is happy that women were granted the right to vote so she can voice her opinion thanks to this amendment!
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
3. What was the purpose of the 13th amendment to the Constitution?
A. to give women the right to vote
B. to allow the Confederate States to re-enter the Union
C. to give African Americans the right to vote
D. to abolish slavery
4. What was the purpose of the 13th amendment to the Constitution?
A. It freed the slaves
B. It led to less segregation
C. It led to more segregation
D. It gave equal protection of the law
5. What was the primary reason for the ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868?
A. to make slavery illegal in the United States
B. to uphold the legality of "separate but equal"
C. to guarantee citizenship rights to African Americans
D. to allow former Confederate officials to hold public office
6. After the Civil War, the purpose of adding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution was to
A. expand educational opportunities for African American men
B. allow women to become full citizens
C. guarantee African Americans equal treatment under the law
D. extend constitutional rights to new territories
7. What was the purpose of the 15th amendment ratified in 1870?
A. to establish a federal income tax
B. to give African American males the right to vote
C. to give women the right to vote
D. to officially end the "Reconstruction Era"
8. John is struggling to pay his bills since he got hurt at work. He is thankful that when he goes to vote in the next election, he doesn’t have to pay a poll tax thanks to this amendment.
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
9. Damian just turned 18 years old. He can’t wait to cast his vote for the first time in the election this year thanks to this amendment.
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
10. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision and the concept of “separate, but equal” thinking was overturned by what follow-up case in 1954?
A. Marbury v. Madison
B. Tinker v. Des Moines
C. Worcester v. Georgia
D. Brown v. Board of Education
Answer:
1. C
2. B
3. D
4. A
5. C
6. C
7. B
8. C
9. A
10. D
Explanation:
Sage files a complaint against Isabel, alleging that Isabel is responsible for damages to Sage's property. Isabel thinks the allegations are ridiculous and doesn't bother to respond to the complaint which she has been served. Which of the following is likely true?
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.
-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.
The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.
Explanation:
Answer:
A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.
Explanation:
what does rule of conduct mean?
Answer:
Code of conduct
Code of conductA code of conduct is a set of rules outlining the norms, rules, and responsibilities or proper practices of an individual party or an organization.
-Wikipedia
Why does my finger smell like poopoo?
Answer:
because you need to wash ur hands
Explanation:
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
Assume instead that, upon witnessing the lovers in each other's arms, Jill departs from the home and drives around in her car for an hour brooding about her husband’s infidelity. She then returns to the home, finds a shotgun in the garage, and then shoots and kills Jack and Sue. What is the offense for which she will now most likely be convicted? Why did you choose this offense? Support your analysis
Answer:
she will have murder charges and assault charges.
Explanation:
murder charges because she shot and killed both of them assault charges because she assaulted them by shooting them, and since she killed 2 people she will most likely be found guilty and will be in jail for at least 10-20 years.
how long do alcohol related charges stay on a driving record? a. two years b. five years c. until a driver renews his/her license d. forever
The alcohol related charges stay on a driving record is for the five years, Thus, option B is correct.
Why is a driving record important?Motor vehicle record or MVRs are significant because they not only provide peace of mind, but also provide critical information about an employee's driving history, disasters, convictions, travelling violations, and suspensions. Drivers who have multiple violations are more likely to be involved in an accident in the future.
Therefore, option B is correct, that the alcohol-related charges remain on a driver's record for five years.
Learn more about the driving record, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10053599
#SPJ1
Which of the following is not a source of law in the U.S.?
Political enactments
Statutory Law
Administrative Law
Case Law
Which of the following is not self-authenticating?
A signed letter that is dated from twelve years ago, that transfers title of land.
A copy of the official Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) record of payment of taxes, certified by the manager of the regional IRS office.
An inventory record for a lumber company which has been properly certified as a business record under hearsay exception 803(6).
An article from the New York Times newspaper.
The document that is not self-authenticating is a signed letter that is dated from twelve year that transfers title of land.
What is a self-authenticating document?In the legal sphere and under the law of evidence, a self-authenticating document refers to any document that can be admitted into evidence at a trial without proof being submitted to support the claim that the document is what it appears to be.
In this context, the examples of a self-authenticating document are:
A copy of the official Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) record of payment of taxes, certified by the manager of the regional IRS office.An inventory record for a lumber company which has been properly certified as a business record under hearsay exception 803(6).An article from the New York Times newspaper.Read more about self-authenticating document
brainly.com/question/14699348
#SPJ1
consertaives are opposed to the exercise of judical power because of concerns that unelected judges will
Conservatives are not necessarily opposed to exercise of judicial power, but they often advocate for more limited role of judiciary in interpreting and enforcing laws.
What is judiciary?The judiciary is the branch of government responsible for interpreting and enforcing the laws of a country. It is composed of judges and courts at various levels, from local to national. The judiciary plays a critical role in upholding the rule of law, protecting individual rights, and resolving disputes. Judges are appointed or elected to their positions and are expected to be impartial and independent from other branches of government. They are responsible for interpreting the constitution and statutes, applying them to specific cases, and making decisions based on the facts presented in court. The judiciary also has the power to review the actions of other branches of government to ensure they are consistent with the law.
To learn more about judiciary, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4
The illinois supreme court hears a case concerning a private citizen who recorded a video of police officers arresting an african american person in a public place. after the citizen was found guilty in a lower court, the illinois supreme court ruled that private citizens have the right to film police officers in public spaces. what is the illinois supreme court implementing in this case
The Illinois Supreme Court is implementing the protection of the right to film police officers in public spaces.
The ruling by the Illinois Supreme Court recognizes the importance of preserving the freedom of expression and the right to gather information in public spaces. By affirming the right of private citizens to record videos of police officers during their official duties, the court ensures transparency and accountability in law enforcement activities. This decision empowers individuals to document and potentially expose instances of misconduct or abuse of power. It serves as a safeguard against potential violations of civil liberties and reinforces the principles of open society and the First Amendment right to free speech.
You can learn more about Supreme Court at
https://brainly.com/question/341135
#SPJ11
list and define the six general categories of crime and give an example of each.
The six general categories of crime include personal crimes (assault, murder), property crimes (theft, arson), inchoate crimes (attempted robbery, conspiracy), financial crimes (fraud, money laundering), statutory crimes (drug possession, traffic violations), and cybercrimes (hacking, phishing). These categories encompass a wide range of offenses involving harm to individuals, property, financial systems, incomplete crimes, violations of specific laws, and illegal activities conducted through digital means.
The six general categories of crime are:
Personal Crimes: These involve direct harm or threat to an individual. Examples include assault, robbery, murder, or domestic violence.Property Crimes: These crimes target someone's property or belongings. Examples include burglary, theft, arson, or vandalism.Inchoate Crimes: These are incomplete or anticipatory crimes. Examples include attempted robbery, solicitation of a crime, or conspiracy.Financial Crimes: These involve illegal activities related to money or finances. Examples include fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or identity theft.Statutory Crimes: These are offenses that violate specific laws or statutes. Examples include traffic violations, drug possession, tax evasion, or public intoxication.Cybercrimes: These crimes are committed using computer networks or digital devices. Examples include hacking, phishing, online fraud, or cyberstalking.To know more about cybercrimes refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/32375073
#SPJ11
Floyd is riding his bicycle down the street while texting on his phone. floyd does not see vivian, a store owner, who is putting magazines out in front of her storefront. he looks up just in time and swerves to miss vivian but knocks her entire magazine rack and newsstand down, totally destroying it. is floyd liable?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, Vivian has a competent loss and lost money.
Indeed, Vivian suffered a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
What is money?Money is a trade good accepted by general consent as a medium of economic conversation. It is the medium in which prices and values are expressed. It flows from person to person and country to country, making trade, and it is the debt measure of wealth. Money is any good that is widely used and accepted in written accounts involving the transfer of goods and divine service from one person to another.
Maybe doing something very likely to accomplish anything When we are weary, we are all more likely to make mistakes. The bridge could fall down at any time. liable to something is that you are likely to be impacted by it. If you exercise infrequently, you are more likely to get hurt.
Therefore, a legitimate loss and lost money. Yes, liable
Learn more about money here:
https://brainly.com/question/22984856
#SPJ2
Most criminal and civil cases can be decided by a(n) ______ jury, which is a jury of citizens that determines the guilt or innocence of a person during a trial.
Most criminal and civil cases can be decided by a petit jury, which is a jury of citizens that determines the guilt or innocence of a person during a trial. The term "petit" comes from the Latin word "pletus," which means "full." A petit jury is typically composed of 12 jurors, but it can be smaller in some cases.
In the United States, the right to a trial by jury is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. This means that a person accused of a crime has the right to have their case decided by a jury of their peers. The jury is responsible for determining whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
A petit jury is also used in some civil cases. In these cases, the jury is responsible for determining whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages from the defendant. The size of the jury in a civil case can vary, but it is typically smaller than a petit jury in a criminal case.
To know more about petit jury:
https://brainly.com/question/31832474
#SPJ4
.
Nancy Pelosi, Democrat
What district or city does
Congresswoman Pelosi represent?
The 12th congressional district of California is located in northern California. Since January 2013, Democrat Nancy Pelosi has represented the district. She has represented San Francisco's congressional districts since 1987.
I hope this helps you
:)
Who was the father of policing?
Sir Robert Peel, in 1829, He made 9 Policing Principles, making him famous for his neutral and upbringing laws.
(T/F) the presence of a gun in the home triples the risk of a homicide occurring in that location.
The given statement "the presence of a gun in the home triples the risk of a homicide occurring in that location." is true as it can lead to increase in homicide.
A widely read study that appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine found that having a gun in the house increased the risk of homicide, which was three times higher in gun owning households than in non gun owning households.
It is significant to note that there are a number of variables that can affect the risk of homicide associated with gun ownership including the type of gun, the owner's age, criminal history and storage methods. The majority of research however points to an increase in injury and fatality risks from firearm related incidents when there are firearms present in the home.
Learn more about homicide at:
brainly.com/question/28177539
#SPJ4