Answer: It had the most relevant information.
It provided many details about Chicago in the nineteenth century.
It provided reasons for Chicago’s growth in the nineteenth century.
It was well organized, which made it easy to find information.
It came from the most reputable author or website.
Explanation:
Answer: History of chicago...then just make up a reason like "it was the most reliable"
Explanation:
Nations with proportional representation tend to have multiparty political systems. Nations with first-past-the-post voting tend to have two-party political systems.
How do different types of voting systems lead to different types of party systems?
Proportional representation (PR) is a voting system in which political parties are awarded a number of seats in proportion to the number of votes they receive. This means that parties with a small share of the vote can still win representation in the government. PR systems are typically used in multiparty systems, where a large number of parties compete for votes and seats in the government.
First-past-the-post (FPTP) is a voting system in which each voter casts a ballot for their preferred candidate, and the candidate who receives the most votes wins the seat. FPTP systems tend to produce two-party systems, where only a few parties have a realistic chance of winning elections.
One reason why PR systems tend to produce multiparty systems is that they allow for a more diverse range of viewpoints to be represented in the government. Since parties with a small share of the vote can still win seats, it is possible for a variety of smaller parties with different ideologies to gain representation. This can lead to a more diverse and representative government.
In contrast, FPTP systems tend to produce two-party systems because they tend to favor the largest parties. In FPTP elections, voters who support smaller parties may feel that their vote is wasted if the party does not have a realistic chance of winning. As a result, they may choose to vote for one of the larger parties instead, leading to a concentration of support for the two largest parties. This can make it difficult for smaller parties to gain representation and can lead to a less diverse range of viewpoints in the government.
Referring to the excerpt from The Great Rogue: A Biography of Captain John Smith, which of the following is a theory that Paul Lewis has come up with about Pocahontas? Referring to the excerpt from The Great Rogue: A Biography of Captain John Smith, which of the following is a theory that Paul Lewis has come up with about Pocahontas? A She was married to John Rolfe. B She arrived in England in 1617. C She was the first Native American woman to visit England. D Many people would probably have ignored her if she wasn’t a Christian.
The correct answer is D) Many people would probably have ignored her if she wasn’t a Christian.
Yes, Pocahontas was married to John Rolfe, she arrived in England in 1617, and she was the first Native American woman to visit England.
The theory that Paul Lewis has come up with about Pocahontas was that many people would probably have ignored her if she wasn’t a Christian.
What Paul Lewis relates is that when Pocahontas traveled to Britain for the first time with her husband John Rolfe, he impressed the English people with her naturalness, beauty, education, and good manners. This happened in 1617.
Pocahontas showed proved to be a charming woman that projected security and refined moods everywhere they went. Lewis comments that Pocahontas -in that time, already converted to Christianity- discussed theology concepts with British Bishops.
What major debates shaped the terms of the Constitution?
Political Debates Between Lincoln and Douglas.
teaching shakespeare in a maximum security prison common lit
It is an excellent idea to teach Shakespeare in a maximum security prison common lit. Shakespearean plays contain multiple themes such as love, betrayal, forgiveness, and vengeance. All of these themes are relevant in a prison setting.
Teaching Shakespeare will also develop the prisoners' reading and comprehension skills. The language of Shakespeare may be complicated at times, but it's an excellent opportunity for the prisoners to develop their vocabulary. As a result, their ability to express themselves will improve, which is an essential skill in the post-prison world.Apart from that, prisoners may learn how to use Shakespeare's language to express their emotions and ideas.
They may identify with certain characters and relate to their circumstances, which could help them in their personal development. Teaching Shakespeare in a maximum security prison common lit is an excellent idea. It will develop the prisoners' reading, comprehension, and expressive skills. It will also help them identify with certain characters and relate to their circumstances, which could aid in their personal development.
To know more about maximum security prison visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29871360
#SPJ11
the sherman act of 1890 had two sections. which of the following most closely describes each of the two sections?
-Every contract, type of trust, or conspiracy, to restrain trade among several states, or with foreign nations is declared illegal.
-Every person or combination of persons who attempt to monopolize any part of trade or commerce shall be deemed guilty of a felony.
The Sherman Act of 1890, an important U.S. antitrust law, consists of two sections that address different aspects of trade and commerce:
Section 1:
"Every contract, type of trust, or conspiracy, to restrain trade among several states, or with foreign nations is declared illegal."
Section 1 of the Sherman Act focuses on prohibiting agreements or actions that restrain trade.
illegal for individuals, companies, or organizations to enter into contracts, form trusts, or engage in conspiracies that restrict trade among multiple states or with foreign nations. The purpose of this section is to promote fair competition and prevent anti-competitive practices that could harm CONSUMERs or stifle market competition.
Section 2:
"Every person or combination of persons who attempt to monopolize any part of trade or commerce shall be deemed guilty of a felony."
Section 2 of the Sherman Act addresses attempts to monopolize trade or commerce. It declares that any person or group of people who try to achieve a monopoly or control over any part of trade or commerce will be considered guilty of a felony. This section aims to prevent the concentration of economic power and the creation or maintenance of monopolies that can harm competition and limit consumer choice.
Learn more about consumer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30132393
#SPJ11
The Sherman Act of 1890 had two sections. The following most closely describes each of the two sections Option A. Every contract, type of trust, or conspiracy, to restrain trade among several states, or with foreign nations is declared illegal.
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is a landmark legislation in the United States that aimed to promote fair competition and prevent monopolistic practices in business. The act consists of two sections, each with a specific focus.
Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which closely aligns with option A, states that any contract, trust, or conspiracy that restrains trade among states or with foreign nations is deemed illegal. This section targets agreements or collaborations among companies that seek to limit competition, control prices, or allocate markets. It is designed to prevent anticompetitive practices such as price-fixing, bid-rigging, and market division. By prohibiting these actions, Section 1 aims to preserve a competitive market environment and ensure that businesses cannot engage in collusive behavior that harms consumers and stifles innovation.
Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which aligns with option B, focuses on monopolistic practices. This section targets actions by individuals or entities that seek to gain exclusive control over a particular industry or market, thereby eliminating or significantly reducing competition. It is intended to prevent the formation or maintenance of monopolies that can harm consumers by limiting choices, raising prices, and stifling innovation.
Together, these two sections of the Sherman Act work in tandem to promote fair competition and prevent anticompetitive practices and monopolies. By prohibiting agreements that restrain trade and penalizing attempts to monopolize, the act aims to protect the interests of consumers and foster a competitive marketplace that encourages innovation, efficiency, and consumer choice. Therefore, the correct option is A.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
The Sherman Act of 1890 had two sections. which of the following most closely describes each of the two sections?
A. Every contract, type of trust, or conspiracy, to restrain trade among several states, or with foreign nations is declared illegal.
B. Every person or combination of persons who attempt to monopolize any part of trade or commerce shall be deemed guilty of a felony.
Know more about Sherman Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/2119756
#SPJ11
nintendo switch or gameboy
Answer:
Nintendo switch
Explanation:
The switch is a more updated, more game play console.
Answer:
Switch is generally better for gaming purposes, but for nostalgia, game boy takes the cake
Explanation:
What event allowed the British to seize de facto political control over India?
A) Engines of social mobility
B) Dutch expulsion
C) Sepoy Revolt/Indian Rebellion of 1857
D) Clive’s conquest
2. The MOST crucial technological breakthrough of the First Industrial Revolution was:
A) the spinning jenny to break the textile industry bottleneck
B) agricultural advances creating an excess of labor
C) easy capital from the triangle trade
D) the development of a general-purpose, portable steam engine by James Watt
3. Which of the following is something Bryan Stevenson fought for?
A) Humane treatment of prisoners
B) Abolishing child incarceration for life
C) Wrongful imprisonment
D) All of these
4. Which of these "-isms" did NOT rise up in the immediate wake of the Industrial Revolution in the
nineteenth century?
A) fascism
B) classical liberalism
C) socialism
D) communism
In 1 Clive’s conquest (D). In 2 the development of a general-purpose, portable steam engine by James Watt (D). In 3 humane treatment of prisoners, abolishing child incarceration for life, and wrongful imprisonment (D). In 4 Fascism (A) did not rise up in the immediate wake of the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century.
1. The British was able to seize de facto political control over India through Clive’s conquest (D).Clive's conquest refers to the British conquest of the Bengal region of the Indian subcontinent that took place between the Battle of Plassey in 1757 and the Battle of Buxar in 1764. The British defeated the French and their local allies and took control of Bengal, which marked the beginning of the British Empire's formal rule in India.
2. The most crucial technological breakthrough of the First Industrial Revolution was the development of a general-purpose, portable steam engine by James Watt (D). This engine could be used to power a wide range of machinery and transformed the way goods were produced, making mass production possible and significantly increasing productivity.
3. Bryan Stevenson fought for humane treatment of prisoners, abolishing child incarceration for life, and wrongful imprisonment (D). Bryan Stevenson is an American lawyer and social justice activist who is known for his work in defending the rights of prisoners on death row and advocating for criminal justice reform.
4. Fascism (A) did not rise up in the immediate wake of the Industrial Revolution in the nineteenth century. Fascism is a political ideology that emerged in the early 20th century, characterized by authoritarianism, nationalism, and anti-democratic and anti-communist beliefs.
To know more about steam engine visit :
https://brainly.com/question/32070495
#SPJ11
The nation's 200th anniversary was called the ______. quadricentennial centennial semicentennial tricentennial bicentennial.
Answer: Bicentennail
Explanation:
How dose a general internet search help in the research process?
Answer:
D). A general search on the internet assists in 'revising your research focus as you uncover more information.'
A basic internet search about a topic can help an individual to broaden the dimensions of his research' by revealing several aspects associated with it.
It provides more details regarding the topic that discloses certain important characteristics or features related to it that may completely cause a shift in the focus of your research.
A simple search using the keywords of the topic will help the researcher in knowing the major and minor aspects of the concept and selecting the dimension he/she is aiming to focus on along with adequate evidence to support it.
Thus, option D is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'Research Process' here:
brainly.com/question/2863083
Explanation:
 how did the articles of confederation limit the power of the federal government
The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution for the United States. Along with this, it is known for being incredibly weak and giving little power to the federal government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government could not tax the states, draft soldiers, regulate trade, or even amend and create new laws.
With the Articles of Confederation being so weak, many people started to realize that having a government that actually had power would be better and strengthen the power of the country as a whole. These people were called Federalists. On the other hand, people who wanted to keep the federal government limited and keep the power in the hands of the people were called Anti-Federalists.
When the Constitutional Convention of 1787 happened, the original goal was just to simply amend the Articles of Confederation. This obviously did not happen though, as the Articles of Confederation was scrapped as a whole and the United States Constitution was created instead, which gave power to the federal government.
Which of these happen first?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
i think c because when world war 1 began then there were souldiers then someone could've gotten flue
?When was the Punjab Olympic
Association established? *
O
1948
O
1951
O
1955
O 1964
no
Answer:
It was established in 1951
Explanation:
Answer:
i believe the answer is 1951 but my parents said 1927
Explanation:
If this road we chart leads to the rights and reforms we demand, if it leads to just wages, humane working conditions, protection from the misuse of pesticides . . . if it changes the social order that relegates us to the bottom reaches of society, then in our wake will follow thousands of American farm workers. Our example will make them free.
–Proclamation of the Delano grape workers
for International Boycott Day,
1969
Why did the United Farm Workers release this document? Check all that apply.
to convince Americans to quit buying grapes
to explain why farm workers were at the bottom of American society
to bring attention to the challenges faced by farm workers
to list the demands the union was seeking in exchange for lifting the boycott
to explain why pesticides are dangerous to farm workers
The United Farm Workers released the document "Proclamation of the Delano grape workers for International Boycott Day, 1969" to:
Convince Americans to quit buying grapesBring attention to the challenges faced by farm workersList the demands the union was seeking in exchange for lifting the boycottWhy did the United Farm Workers release this document to achieve their goals?The document was released to convince Americans to support the boycott by abstaining from buying grapes, which was a key strategy in pressuring grape growers to improve working conditions and wages for farm workers.
It aimed to raise awareness about the challenges faced by farm workers, such as low wages, poor working conditions, and exposure to dangerous pesticides. The document likely listed the specific demands that the union was seeking from grape growers in order to lift the boycott, which could have included better wages, improved working conditions, and increased protections against pesticides.
Read more about Proclamation of the Delano
brainly.com/question/25280450
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP ASAP 100 POINTS! HISTORY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
Source 1: “I’m Just a Bill” lyrics and video, Schoolhouse Rock
The main idea of the song is to explain the process of how a bill becomes a law in a simple and memorable way that children can understand. It follows the journey of a bill from its introduction in Congress to its final approval by the President. The main message of the song is that the process of passing a bill into law is a long and complicated one that involves many steps and requires the cooperation of different branches of government. Some important details from the song include: The bill starts as an idea that can come from anyone, such as a citizen, a group, or a member of Congress. The bill is introduced in either the House of Representatives or the Senate and is assigned to a committee for review and possible revisions. The bill may be revised multiple times before it is presented to the full House or Senate for a vote. If the bill passes in one chamber, it moves on to the other chamber for consideration and voting. If the bill is passed by both chambers, it goes to a conference committee to work out any differences between the two versions. If the conference committee reaches an agreement, the bill is sent back to both chambers for a final vote. If the bill is approved by both chambers, it is sent to the President for signature. The President can either sign the bill into law or veto it and send it back to Congress. If the President vetoes the bill, Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House and the Senate. Once the bill becomes a law, it is added to the U.S. Code, which is the official compilation of federal laws.
Source 2:
The main message of political cartoons that explore this theme is often to point out the contrast between the idealized version of politics that is taught in political science classes and the messy, complicated reality of politics in the real world. The cartoons often highlight the ways in which political science theories and models fail to capture the complexity and unpredictability of real-life political situations. The main idea is that political science can provide a useful framework for understanding politics, but it often falls short in explaining how politics actually works in practice. Political cartoons that explore this theme may criticize politicians, political scientists, or the political system as a whole for failing to live up to the idealized version of politics that is presented in political science.
Some important details that may be included in political cartoons on this theme include:
Depictions of politicians or political scientists as out of touch with the realities of politics on the ground.Examples of political events or situations that defy the predictions of political science models or theories.Critiques of the ways in which political science simplifies or generalizes complex political phenomena.Satirical depictions of political science jargon or concepts as detached from the messy reality of politics.Commentary on the ways in which political science can be used to legitimize or justify political actions that may not align with democratic principles or values.
#SPJ1
Answer:
Give a man a fish he’s fed for a day. Teach a man to fish, he’ll be fed for a life time. Here’s an answer worth more than points: Chat GPT.
Explanation:
The free Chat GPT can make graphs, tables and more. It can even write stories and narrative pieces for you. It has perfect grammar when translating, and it can understand code and typed graphs as well, so it can answer your question.
QUESTION 3: APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA-1940s TO 1960s KEY QUESTION: HOW DID THE APARTHEID LAWS VIOLATE THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF PEOPLE IN SOUTH AFRICA? SOURCE A This source deals with some of the reasons for the implementation of Apartheid and was taken from History of Southern Africa by K. Shillington. In the words of one of the architects of apartheid, H.F. Verwoerd, Minister of Bantu Administration, and later Prime Minister (1958-66) there was no place for blacks in the European community above the level of labourer. To offer blacks the same education as whites, he argued, would mislead them by showing them the green pastures of European society which they were not allowed to graze. The apartheid laws were not only the racist views of Afrikaner nationalists, but some of them also had specific advantages for capitalist employers who paid blacks low wages and made huge profits. Blacks, who formed the bulk of the working class, were kept in a subordinate position with laws such as the Industrial Reconciliation Act, Mine and Workers Act and the Civilised Labour Policy. The National Party was returned to office with greatly increased majorities in the general elections of the 1950s and 1960s. SOURCE $By use your own knowledge and explain some of the laws as mentioned in the source that kept blacks in subordinate position in the work place
The Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa by assault and torture in police custody, detention without charge or trial, and restriction orders.
The Apartheid laws affected the people of South Africa where the pass laws and Apartheid policies prohibited the Black people there from entering urban areas without immediately finding a job. However, it was illegal for a Black person not to carry a passbook.
Black people could not even marry white people. Also, in South Africa they could not even set up businesses in white areas. So, this way the Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa.
Hence, Apartheid was a system of segregation and discrimination.
To learn more about the Apartheid laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/3860599
#SPJ1
Discovering Blas In Media
Read each of the articles about Brown v Board of Education. Decide if the article supports the decision to end
segregation (✔), or is against the decision to end segregation (X). The names of the cities have been taken
out so that you can't use that in your decision making.
Times: "All God's Chillun," May 18, 1954
It is true, of course, that the court is not talking of that sort of "equality" which produces interracial marriages. It
is not talking of a social system at all. It is talking of a system of human rights which is foreshadowed in the second
paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, which stated "that all men are created equal." Mr. Jefferson and the
others who were responsible for the Declaration did not intend to say that all men are equally intelligent, equally
good or equal in height or weight. They meant to say that all men were, and ought to be, equal before the law. If
men are equal, children are equal, too. There is an even greater necessity in the case of children, whose
opportunities to advance themselves and to be useful to the community may be lost if they do not have the right to
be educated.
No one can deny that the mingling of the races in the schools of the seventeen states which have required
segregation and the three states which have permitted it will create problems. The folkways in southern
communities will have to be adapted to new conditions if white and Negro children, together with white and Negro
teachers, are to enjoy not only equal facilities but the same facilities in the same schools.
***
The highest court in the land, the guardian of our national conscience, has reaffirmed its faith-and the undying
American faith-in the equality of all men and all children before the law.
2. Defender: "End of Dual Society," May 18, 1954
Neither the atom bomb nor the hydrogen bomb will ever be as meaningful to our democracy as the unanimous
decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that racial segregation violates the spirit and letter of our
Constitution. This means the beginning of the end of the dual society in American life and the... segregation which
supported it.
3.
Post and Times Herald: A 'Healing' Decision," May 18, 1954
The Supreme Court's resolution yesterday of the school segregation cases affords all Americans an occasion for pride
and gratification. The decision will prove, we are sure-whatever transient difficulties it may create and whatever
irritations it may arouse-a profoundly healthy and healing one. It will serve-and speedily-to close an ancient wound
too long allowed to fester. It will bring to an end a painful disparity between American principals and American
practices. It will help to refurbish American prestige in a world which looks to this land for moral inspiration and
restore the faith of Americans themselves in their own great values and traditions.
4.
Daily News: "Bloodstains On White Marble Steps," May 18, 1954
... Human blood may stain Southern soil in many places because of this decision but the dark red stains of that
blood will be on the marble steps of the United States Supreme Court building. White and Negro children in the
same schools will lead to miscegenation (mixing of racial groups). Miscegenation leads to mixed marriages and mixed
marriages lead to mongrelization (inferior) of the human race.
5.
Herald: "Equality Redefined," May 18, 1954
The Supreme Court's history-making decision against racial segregation in the public schools proves more than
anything else that the Constitution is still a live and growing document.... The segregation ruling is frankly beneficial.
It recognizes the growing national feeling that the separation of Negro (or other minority) children from the majority
race at school age is an abuse of the democratic process and the democratic principle. But it is also the culmination
of a series of judicial opinions which circumspectly prepared the way for change.
6.
Cavalier Daily:" Violates' Way of Life," May 18, 1954
It is too early to tell what effect the Supreme Court decision to abolish segregated schools will have on the South....
Although it is hard from a strict legal point of view to justify any action contrary to law, we feel that the people of the
South are justified in their bitterness concerning this decision. To many people this decision is contrary to a way of
life and violates the way in which they have thought since 1619.
The Supreme Court's decision to remove segregation in public schools is supported by Articles 1, 2, 3, and 5, whereas Articles 4 and 6 are opposed to it.
What is the Brown v Board of Education?Times: "All God's Chillun," May 18, 1954
Defender: "End of Dual Society," May 18, 1954
Post and Times Herald: A 'Healing' Decision," May 18, 1954
Daily News: "Bloodstains On White Marble Steps," May 18, 1954
Herald: "Equality Redefined," May 18, 1954
Cavalier Daily:" Violates' Way of Life," May 18, 1954
This decision marked a turning point in the Civil Rights Movement and had far-reaching implications for ending racial segregation in all areas of American life.
Therefore, Articles 1, 2, 3, and 5 are supportive of the Supreme Court's decision to end segregation in public schools, while articles 4 and 6 are against it.
Learn more about education here:
https://brainly.com/question/18023991
#SPJ1
Please help with this picture provided
On the other hand, Senate regulations and procedures encourage contemplation over hasty action because they provide individual Senators enormous procedural power.
What determines the rules and processes of the Senate?The Senate is controlled by the Constitution, a collection of established standing rules, case law developed during the legislative process, including unique procedural rules introduced by statute for particular forms of legislation.
What is the function of the Senate Rules as well as Administration?The legislation creating federal election regulations is under the purview of the Senate Rules Committee, which also has oversight over the internal operations of the Senate.
What happens in the Senate?The bill is approved by a simple majority (51 of 100). Finally, any discrepancies between the House and the Senate versions of the bill are resolved by a conference committee made up of members of both chambers.
To know more about Senate rules and procedures visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1064591
#SPJ9
Explain what Prince Metternich meant by the seed of revolution. Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.
Prince Metternich believed that "the seed of revolution" had been sown across Europe and that this would lead to unrest in various countries, as he said.
The seeds of the revolution have been sown in every country of Europe; they are showing themselves in different ways, but everywhere they are the same. There are a variety of interpretations of what Prince Metternich meant by "the seed of revolution." Metternich was alarmed by the spread of revolutionary ideals, such as nationalism and democracy, and by the political and social changes that accompanied them.
According to Prince Metternich, the seed of revolution was sown everywhere, and its effects could be seen in a variety of ways. As a result, he predicted that the unrest would increase throughout Europe. This can be seen in the following quote from Prince Metternich: "The seeds of revolution have been sown in every country of Europe; they are showing themselves in different ways, but everywhere they are the same. "
To summarize, Prince Metternich meant that the spread of revolutionary ideals had taken root in various parts of Europe, leading to unrest. He believed that this would only grow in intensity over time, leading to social and political upheaval.
Learn more about the Prince Metternich here: https://brainly.com/question/12152440
#SPJ11
What are the similarities between Animal Farm and the Russian Revolution?
Animal Farm has a story or allegory about the Russian Revolution. The revolt of the animals against Farmer Jones takes place at the Manor Farm, which is reminiscent of the Russian people's revolt against Czar Nicholas II.
What makes it a revolution?
A revolution is a sudden change in the way politics is conducted. It usually begins with a violent uprising of the people. A revolution occurs when a sizable number of people resolve to topple an oppressive government. A revolution alters a nation's social, economic, and political policies. The word "revolution" literally translates as "turning around." It usually begins with a violent uprising of the people. A revolution occurs when a significant number of people resolve to topple an oppressive government.
Know more about against Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28519977
#SPJ4
Define the Christian concept of the ‘Just War’ theory’
Answer:
Explanation:
The Christian concept of the "Just War" theory is a moral and ethical framework that seeks to provide guidelines for determining when the use of force in war is morally justifiable. It is rooted in the belief that war should be approached with caution and should only be considered as a last resort.
The principles of the Just War theory can be traced back to early Christian thinkers such as St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. While there may be variations in interpretation, the theory generally consists of two broad categories: jus ad bellum (the right to wage war) and jus in bello (the right conduct within war).
Jus ad bellum encompasses the criteria that must be met for a war to be considered morally justifiable:
Just Cause: The war must be fought for a just and legitimate reason, such as self-defense against aggression, protection of innocent lives, or the defense of basic human rights.
Legitimate Authority: The decision to wage war must be made by a legitimate governing authority, such as a recognized government or international body, and not by individuals or groups acting without proper authority.
Right Intention: The intention behind waging war must be to establish a just and lasting peace, rather than pursuing revenge, conquest, or other unjust motives.
Last Resort: All peaceful means of resolving the conflict must have been exhausted before resorting to war. Diplomatic negotiations and other nonviolent methods should be actively pursued.
Proportionality: The overall good achieved by the war must outweigh the harm caused. The use of force should be proportional to the threat and should not result in excessive or indiscriminate violence.
HELP! Which of the following was in the final ruling in the Dred Scott case?
options:
a-Slavery could never legally end
b-Slavery helped the economy
c-Slaves were essential to a healthy life
d-Slaves were property and not citizens and could not sue in court
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
What evidence does Chesnut offer to support her allegation about interracial sexual relations between owners and enslaved women. What value judgements does she make? Why does she call slavery " a monstrous system"?
Mary Boykin Chesnut, A Confederate Lady's Diary (1861)
I wonder if it be a sin to think slavery a curse to any land. Sumner said not one word of this hated institution which is not true. Men & women are punished when their masters & mistresses are brutes & not when they do wrong-& then we live surrounded by prostitutes. An abandoned woman is sent out of any decent house elsewhere. Who thinks any worse of a Negro or Mulatto woman for being a thing we can't name. God forgive us, but ours is a monstrous system & wrong & iniquity. Perhaps the rest of the world is as bad. This is only what I see: like the patriarchs of old, our men live all in one house with their wives & their concubines, & the Mulattos one sees in every family exactly resemble the white children-& every lady tells you who is the father of all the Mulatto children in everybody's household, but those in her own, she seems to think drop from the clouds or pretends so to think-. Good women we have, but they talk of nastiness tho they never do wrong; they talk day & night of -. My disgust sometimes is boiling over-but they are, I believe, in conduct the purest women God ever made. Thank God for my countrywomen-alas for the men! No worse than men everywhere, but the lower their mistresses, the more degraded they must be.
My mother-in-law told me when I was first married not to send my female servants in the street on errands. They were there tempted, led astray-& then she said placidly, "So they told me when I came here-& I was very particular, but you see with what result. " Mr. Harris said it was so patriarchal. So it is-flocks & herds & slaves-& wife Leah does not suffice. Rachel must be added, if not married & all the time they seem to think themselves patterns-models of husbands & fathers.
Mrs. Davis told me "everybody described my husband's father as an odd character, a Millionaire who did nothing for his son whatever, left him to struggle with poverty," &c. I replied, "Mr. Chesnut Senior thinks himself the best of fathers-& his son thinks likewise. I have nothing to say-but it is true, he has no money but what he makes as a lawyer," &c. Again I say, my countrywomen are as pure as angels-tho surrounded by another race who are-the social evil!
Chesnut offers evidence of societal acceptance and knowledge of parentage to support her allegation of interracial relations. She makes value judgments by denouncing slavery as a "monstrous system" due to its immorality and degradation.
Evidence of interracial sexual relations between owners and enslaved women can be found in Mary Boykin Chesnut's diary. She mentions that men and women are punished not for doing wrong, but rather when their masters and mistresses are cruel. Chesnut observes that abandoned women are sent away from decent houses, while the same does not happen to enslaved women.
She argues that society does not view a Negro or Mulatto woman negatively for being involved in such relationships. Chesnut also mentions that every lady knows the father of all the Mulatto children in each household, except her own, which implies a widespread acceptance of interracial relationships among slaveholders.
Chesnut makes a value judgment by referring to slavery as a "monstrous system" and denouncing it as wrong and iniquitous. She expresses her disgust with the system and acknowledges that it brings out her anger. Chesnut highlights the degradation of men who engage in relationships with lower-status mistresses, suggesting that the immorality of slavery extends beyond the act itself.
Chesnut's calling slavery a "monstrous system" reflects her belief that it is fundamentally immoral and unjust. She questions whether it is sinful to consider slavery a curse to any land. Chesnut's understanding of the patriarchal structure within society, where men have wives and concubines, leads her to draw comparisons with the Mulatto children who resemble their white siblings. This further reinforces her condemnation of the institution.
In conclusion, Chesnut supports her allegation about interracial sexual relations through her observations of societal acceptance and knowledge of the Mulatto children's parentage. Her value judgments against slavery stem from her belief in the immorality of the system and the degradation it imposes on both enslaved individuals and their masters. She characterizes slavery as a "monstrous system" due to its inherent wrongness and iniquity.
For more such questions on degradation, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/618166
#SPJ8
Why and how did the emergence of towns weaken feudalism?
(Middle Ages)
Answer:
The rise of towns tended to weaken both feudalism and manorialism. Towns weakened manorialism by supplying serfs and peasants with a way to escape their lot in life.
Panuto: Punan ang Ladder Web ng mga naging
pagbabago sa antas ng lipunan noong panahon ng
Espanyol
1
2
3
1
5.
Answer:
\(6\)
hsudijsisisieieiiew
Match the description to the culture. Foraged for food, invented the atlatl and bow & arrow, lived together in small communities. 1. Paleolithic C Built ceremonial centers where people gathered for worship and recreation, traded with others for what they needed. 2. Archaic 3. Woodland Invented and used stone weapons to hunt large animals, 4. Mississippian Grew corn, beans, and squash, and were dependent on forest resources
Answer:
I think it is woodland
Explanation:
I mayb be wrong but I am pretty sure :)
judging from its rulings from 1864 to the early 1930s, the supreme court would most likely uphold which of the following laws?
The Supreme Court upholds a law that prevents the government from invalidating contracts, even if illegally secured.
Why do Supreme Court upholds a law?
There are at the minimum two reasons why the Supreme Court would analyze a law the lower court approved.
First, the Court could conclude that the lower court was too distinctive to Congress. Second, the Court could determine that it is ready to work a swap in constitutional meaning.As to the first, courts tend to give great distinction to the legislature.
Learn more about supreme court here:
https://brainly.com/question/18716334
#SPJ4
Boston, New York, and Charleston prospered during the colonial era due to what
geographic feature?
A)Fertile soil
B)Natural harbors
C)Deposits of precious metals
D)Large tracks of forest
Answer:
B) Natural Harbors
Explanation:
HELP!! Representative government in the form of the Iroquois League arose because Daganawidah—an Iroquois healer—believed his nation and neighboring nations needed __________.
A.
a peaceful way to solve disputes
B.
a new law that allowed intertribal marriage
C.
a treaty for crossing into other territories without being attacked
D.
a council to discuss the proper etiquette for war, including banning night attacks and horseback raids
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
A. a peaceful way to solve disputes
Explanation:
Where did Queen Amanirena power come from?
Answer:
Amanirenas (also spelled Amanirena) was a queen of the Kingdom of Kush from c. 40 BC to c. 10 BC. Her full title was Amnirense qore li kdwe li ("Ameniras, ...
Explanation:
I hope it help and have great day
What are 3 major accomplishments of Thomas Jefferson?
Answer:
There are three major accomplishments that Thomas Jefferson wanted to be remembered for. He was the author of the Declaration of Independence, he passed a statute in Virginia for Religious Freedom, and he founded the University of Virginia. He asked that his accomplishments be put on his tombstone.