Which of the following statements about the functions of Congress is true, based on the infographic?
A. Writing and approving legislation is a rapid and efficient process.
B. A bill that is approved by a committee is guaranteed to become a law.
C. A bill may be killed at many points throughout the lawmaking process.
D. A bill is considered to be a law when the Senate and the House agree on its wording.

Indeed, the statement "if a state appraisal regulatory agency revokes an appraiser's certification, the agency should notify the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC)" is accurate.

State appraisal regulatory agencies are responsible for overseeing real estate appraisal licensing at the state level, while the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) serves as a federal agency that monitors and supervises these state appraisal boards. The ASC ensures that state boards comply with consistent standards and regulations in their appraisal regulation activities.

Thus, when a state appraisal regulatory agency revokes an appraiser's certification, it is required to inform the ASC to ensure proper communication and compliance at the federal level.

To know more about agency, visit:
brainly.com/question/30556993

#SPJ11

The use of unreasonable force, if determined to be excessive, may subject employees to legal consequences and disciplinary actions.

Law enforcement agencies and organizations have policies and regulations in place to govern the use of force by their employees. The use of force should be reasonable and proportionate to the circumstances at hand. If an employee uses force that is deemed unreasonable or excessive, there can be various legal and disciplinary consequences:

1. Legal Consequences: The use of excessive force by law enforcement officers can lead to legal repercussions, such as civil lawsuits or criminal charges. Individuals who have been subjected to excessive force can file lawsuits alleging violations of their constitutional rights, such as the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. If the court determines that the force used was excessive and violated the individual's rights, the employee may be held liable for damages.

2. Internal Disciplinary Actions: Law enforcement agencies typically have internal affairs divisions or equivalent units responsible for investigating allegations of misconduct, including the use of excessive force. If an employee's use of force is determined to be unreasonable or excessive through an internal investigation, they may face disciplinary actions, ranging from reprimands, suspensions, demotions, or even termination. The severity of the disciplinary actions depends on the specific policies and guidelines of the agency and the seriousness of the misconduct.

3. Criminal Charges: In cases where the use of force rises to the level of criminal conduct, employees may face criminal charges. Prosecutors can bring charges such as assault, battery, or manslaughter, depending on the circumstances and the level of harm caused by the excessive force. Criminal convictions can result in penalties including fines, probation, or imprisonment.

4. Loss of Professional Standing: The use of excessive force can damage an employee's professional reputation and standing within the law enforcement community. Instances of misconduct may lead to a loss of trust from colleagues, supervisors, and the public, making it difficult for the employee to continue their career in law enforcement.

It is essential for law enforcement agencies to have clear policies, training, and accountability mechanisms in place to prevent the use of unreasonable force and address instances of excessive force promptly and appropriately. By holding employees accountable for their actions, agencies can strive to maintain public trust and ensure the fair and just treatment of individuals.


To learn more about legal consequences click here: brainly.com/question/28357260

#SPJ11

The correct answer to the given question is D. Doing Business Clause. According to the Supreme Court of the United States, a foreign corporation may be brought into a state's court in connection with its activities within the state, provided that the state does not violate the corporation's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution and its rights under the Doing Business Clause.

The Doing Business Clause is a provision that authorizes a state to regulate foreign corporations that are doing business in the state. It permits the state to impose taxes, fees, and other requirements on foreign corporations that are conducting business within the state. The Doing Business Clause is part of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.

For more such questions on Doing Business Clause

https://brainly.com/question/30408901

#SPJ11

The defense that requires a jury to divide up the proportion of negligence committed by the parties in terms of percentage is called "comparative negligence." Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to determine responsibility and damages in personal injury cases.

It is a defense used by the defendant, which asserts that the plaintiff was partially or wholly responsible for the damages suffered, and thus the defendant should only be held liable for the percentage of damages that they caused. Comparative negligence requires a jury to apportion liability between the plaintiff and defendant based on their respective degrees of fault.

The jury is asked to determine the percentage of negligence attributed to each party, and damages are awarded based on that percentage. In states that follow pure comparative negligence, a plaintiff can still recover damages even if they were found to be 99% at fault, but their damages will be reduced by their percentage of fault.

Learn more about doctrine

https://brainly.com/question/30613074

#SPJ11

Answer: I think it's d

Explanation:

Answer: False

Explanation: Criminal law is relevant to business because crime presents real threats. When crimes are committed, people are injured. Criminal behavior is punishable by law. Risks to business posed by crime arise from the losses suffered from the criminal activities of those on the outside of the business organization, as well as those on the inside. Corporations themselves can be liable for crime when an employee working within the scope of employment commits crime that benefits the corporation, or when the corporation itself commits crime.

Place the car in park and turn off the ignition.

Remain still, any suspicious movement from you (even a sudden lowering of one or both shoulders) can prompt a search. Keep your hands in plain sight, preferably on the top of the steering wheel with your fingers visible. Do not get out of the vehicle.

Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 requires real estate appraisals used in federal government transactions to be completed in writing and to uniform standards.

The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) is a law passed in 1989 in response to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s that revised the federal government agency structure and rules governing the United States savings and loan banking system and the real estate appraisal industry. The following are some of the major changes brought about by the law:

Learn more about the Enforcement Act with the help of the given link:

brainly.com/question/14620330

#SPJ1

Judicial activism refers to a philosophy of interpretation that emphasizes the judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution as a flexible and evolving document rather than as a fixed and rigid set of principles.

This approach allows the courts to adapt to changing social, political, and economic conditions and respond to new challenges and issues. It is often contrasted with judicial restraint, which holds that the courts should interpret the Constitution strictly and limit their role too narrowly to interpreting the law and not making policy decisions.

Judicial activism and judicial restraint are often seen as competing approaches to the judiciary's role in interpreting the Constitution and shaping public policy. The debate between these two perspectives often centers on the balance between the role of the judiciary in protecting individual rights and the role of the legislative and executive branches in making policy decisions.

To learn more about judicial activism, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/509532

#SPJ4

Answer:

true or false? the professor uses the phrases the law of ideas and intellectual property law interchangeably.

racial segregation

The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

In writing Paragraphs you must consider the structure of the Paragraphs, Paragraphs contain three main parts:

Generally, In written language, a paragraph is a group of sentences that discuss a single topic. Paragraphs are used to help organize written text and make it easier for readers to understand the main points being made.

They are typically marked by a new line and an indentation at the beginning of the first sentence. Paragraphs can be of varying lengths, but it is generally recommended to keep them relatively short, as long paragraphs can be difficult for readers to follow.

As the sun set on the horizon, the sky was painted in a beautiful array of orange and pink hues. The air was cool and crisp, and a gentle breeze rustled the leaves of the trees.

A small stream gurgled nearby, and the sound of birds chirping filled the air. It was the perfect evening to sit outside and enjoy nature's beauty.

Read more about the Paragraphs

https://brainly.com/question/24460908

#SPJ1

Answer: sample answer is the following below

1. Explaining checks and balances

A. Definition of checks and balances in my own words

B. Example of checks and balances

2. The idea of this principle in the preamble

A. Quotation from the preamble

B. Explanation of the quotation

Explanation:

edge 2023

Answer:

Explanation:

The question has been raised as to whether the President is Commander in Chief of the Air Force established as a separate branch of the National Military? It is clear that the President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of the United States comprised within the national military establishment—the Air. Force as well as the Army and the Navy. Under the Constitution, the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy is the supreme military commander charged with the responsibility of protecting and defending the United States. The phrase “Army and Navy” is used in the Constitution as a means of describing all the armed forces of the United States. The fact that one branch of the armed forces is called the “Air Force,” a name not known when the Constitution was adopted, and the fact that the Congress has seen fit to separate the air arm of our armed forces from the land and sea arms cannot detract from the President’s authority as

Commander in Chief of all the armed forces : HAROLD I. BAYNTON

Acting Assistant to the Attorney General

Studying sociology helps people be more open to diverse cultures and different

   Sociology is a discipline that analyzes human society critically. Different cultures are a result of the fact that societies are rarely culturally homogeneous. Different cultural traditions emerge as cultures grow and become more complicated. The likelihood that a culture will be internally diverse and varied increases with the complexity of the society. Cultural diffusion, invention, and the imposing of cultural change by the outside world are the causes of cultural changes in a society.

    Thus sociology examines human society in order to understand cultural diversity. It claims that factors like language, beliefs, customs, and values contribute to cultural diversity.

To learn more about sociology click here:

https://brainly.com/question/4120495

#SPJ9

If H.R. 3999 is amended with different versions and passed in every chamber, then the type of committee which will allow to revise the House and Senate bills is: Option B. Select committee.

Select committees are created with the aid of using a decision to behavior investigations or remember measures, generally on a selected topic, and aren't renewed on a everlasting foundation with the terrific exception of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. According to the given question, we're requested to discover the kind of committee which might revise the house and Senate payments if H.R. 3999 is amended and extraordinary variations are exceeded in every chamber.

The pick committee includes thirteen Members of the House appointed with the aid of using the Speaker; five need to be appointed after session with the minority leader. The decision offers the pick committee certain powers, together with the authority to maintain hearings, acquire evidence, and trouble subpoenas. As a end result of this, we will see that there may be a want for a pick committee to make the revision due to the fact their feature is an investigative one which could make reviews or drafts to a law.

Learn more about committee visit: brainly.com/question/14086992

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

If H.R. 3999 is amended and different versions are passed in each chamber, which type of committee will revise the House and Senate bills?

A. joint committee

B. select committee

C. standing committee

D. conference committee

The acquittal of Mr. Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two men and wounded another in a riot against the killing of Jacob Blake, who was protesting the police brutality against George Floyd, can only be seen as a symbol of America's racial divide.

The question is, was Mr. Rittenhouse right to carry a gun at 17 years when he was attending to keep the peace and provide medical aid to protesters? At his age then, was Mr. Rittenhouse authorized to belong to a Vigilante Group that could keep the peace in racial protests?

Thus, given Mr. Rittenhouse's age and the purpose of his presence at the scene of rioting, the verdict that acquitted him is bound to attract controversy concerning broader issues of vigilantism, gun rights, and proper definition of self-defense.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/25716779

Answer:It affects labor markets, patterns of saving and consumption, families and households, networks and social interaction

Explanation: Brainliest

The key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of English common law was basically to provide a fair and efficient system for resolving disputes and enforcing laws in the country.

The common law system, that developed in England in the Middle Ages, played a greater emphasis on the role of judges in making decisions based on custom, precedents, and reason, rather than relying solely on written laws or edicts from a monarch. It further led to the creation of law courts to hear and decide these cases, and also established a legal precedents that would guide future decisions.

The overall development of the English common law system and its various courts helped in creating a more stable and predictable legal framework, it also played a key role in the growth and development of English society.

To know more about English common law refer to-

brainly.com/question/7413269#

#SPJ4

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do is not true of couples who cohabitate before marriage as compared to those who do not live together.

Regarding the levels of commitment between married couples and cohabiting couples, studies are not unanimous. Cohabiting couples may be less committed and more likely to end their relationship than married couples, according to some studies, while married couples may be more committed overall.

Additionally, research suggests that couples who live together before getting married are more likely to get divorced than those who do not. It is crucial to remember that every person's situation is unique, so generalizations about cohabitation shouldn't be made based on them.

The question is incomplete, complete question is "Which of the following is NOT a reason why an older person might choose to cohabit rather than marry?

cohabiting couples are more likely than married couples to split up because of conflicts about money

Cohabitation is most common among people with lower levels of education and income

Most cohabiting relationships do not last longer than two years

Cohabiting couples, as a whole, have the same level of commitment to each other and the relationship that married couples do"

Learn more about Cohabiting couples at:

brainly.com/question/31749142

#SPJ4

Answer:

$14,750

Explanation:

Since the lender has agreed to lend 85% of the purchase price, the buyer must provide 15% of the purchase price.

Purchase Price = $112,500

Cash Deposit (15%) = 15% of 112,500 =0.15 X 112,500 =$16,875

Amount to be Paid by the buyer

= Cash Deposit + Closing Cost

=$16,875 + $4,375

=$21,250

Since the buyer has made an earnest money deposit of $6,500,

The additional cash which the buyer must bring to closing

=Amount to be Paid by the buyer - Earnest Deposit

=21250 - 6500

=$14,750

Cash is a form of legal cash than can be used to trade commodities or pay debts. The value of assets can be turned into cash quickly is commonly referred to as "cash".

Given Information:-

Since the lender has agreed to lend 85% of the purchase price, the buyer must provide 15% of the purchase price.

Purchase Price = $112,500

Cash Deposit (15%) = 15% of 112,500 =0.15 X 112,500 =$16,875

Amount to be Paid by the buyer:-

= Cash Deposit + Closing Cost

=$16,875 + $4,375

=$21,250

Since, the buyer has made an earnest money deposit of $6,500,

The additional cash which the buyer must bring to closing

=Amount to be Paid by the buyer - Earnest Deposit

=21250 - 6500

=$14,750

To know more about purchase price, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1698287

Answer:

k I will do so

Explanation:

mark me brainy plz

U.S. taxpayers utilize form 1040 to submit an annual income tax return to the government that lists wages, taxes paid, and reconciliation.

To learn more about annual income tax, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/30157668

Answer: 12 oz of beer

Explanation: In the United States, one "standard" drink (or one alcoholic drink equivalent) contains roughly 14 grams of pure alcohol, which is found in: 12 ounces of regular beer, which is usually about 5% alcohol. 5 ounces of wine, which is typically about 12% alcohol. 1.5 ounces of distilled spirits, which is about 40% alcohol.

HOPE IT HELPS

The standard which is not considered a drink is 12 ounces of beer with 8% alcohol. Hence, Option (A) is correct.

A standard drink is defined as the amount of alcohol that contains approximately 14 grams (0.6 ounces) of pure alcohol.

Let's analyze the given information:

However, the 12 ounces of beer with 8% alcohol exceeds the alcohol content typically found in a Standard Drink.

Thus, it contains more than the usual amount of pure alcohol and, therefore, is not considered a Standard Drink.

Learn more about Standard Drink here:

https://brainly.com/question/28039452

#SPJ2

One source of funds from which life insurance policy dividends are paid is investment experience, specifically when invested premiums earn a higher return than was assumed.

When policyholders pay premiums for their life insurance policies, a portion of these funds are invested by the insurance company. These investments generate returns, which contribute to the overall financial performance of the company. If the invested premiums earn a higher return than what was originally projected or assumed by the company's actuaries, it creates a surplus of funds.

This surplus, resulting from favorable investment experience, allows the insurance company to distribute dividends to policyholders. These dividends can be paid out in the form of cash payments, reduction in premiums, or an increase in the policy's cash value. Essentially, the excess investment earnings serve as a source of funds to provide additional benefits to policyholders.

It is important to note that investment experience is just one of the factors contributing to the payment of life insurance policy dividends. Other factors, such as mortality experience (number of deaths compared to projections) and expense management, also play a role in determining the amount of dividends.

Learn more about insurance policy

brainly.com/question/7465532

#SPJ11

Answer:

If you were wronged, you have the right to sue. But, there are things you have to know before you sue, like:

   Who to sue,

   Where they are,

   What you need to do before you sue them,

   Where you should sue them, and

   If you should sue them.

These are hard questions to answer, even in an easy case like a slip-and-fall in a store. For example, if you slip on the floor in a supermarket, you have to figure out if the store is part of a chain or just one store, if falling was partly or totally your fault, etc.

In a complicated case, like if the same slip and fall happened on land that the county owns, but that a government agency rents, you have to figure out who was responsible for slippery ground, and follow the laws for suing the government. If you sue a government agency, you have to follow the laws for notice. This is a fancy way of saying that before you sue a government agency you have to fill out papers that say that you’re suing them.

There’s a time limit to give notice. After you file your notice, you don’t have much time to file your lawsuit. Claim limits like this protect hospitals and other businesses. If you do not follow these rules, get ready to fight. If you don’t do things on time, you may lose your right to sue. You could ruin your lawsuit.

Even more important are time limits called "statute of limitations." These statutes, or laws, say when you can file your action. If you don’t file on time, you lose automatically. For example, if you are in a car crash, you have 2 years to file a lawsuit. This might not be true for your case. You have to check the time limit yourself. But in general this is the case. If you wait one day after the time limit, the Court won’t let you sue, except in very special circumstances.

This means that even if you have a good case, you lose because you didn’t file on time. The person you sue can challenge you at any time. They can appeal and win. That’s because the statute of limitations says if the Court can hear and decide the case at all. If you wait too long, you take away the Court’s jurisdiction to hear your case.

What are Summons and Complaint:

A general civil lawsuit starts when the plaintiff files 2 forms.

A Summons is a notice that says there’s a lawsuit.

A Complaint is a form that says how the person was hurt, who hurt them and how much the damages are.

Where do I file my lawsuit?

There are a lot of things to think when you decide where to file your complaint. For example:

   Jurisdiction:

   Jurisdiction can mean more than one thing. The Court has to have “jurisdiction” over the defendant. This means that the Court has the right to hear and decide a case for the person you are suing. In general, you have to file your lawsuit where the injury happened, or where the contract was supposed to happen, or where the defendant lives.

   There can be other requirements. Check the California Code of Civil Procedure .

   Then, the Court also has to have jurisdiction over how much money you want. You have to file your lawsuit in the right court:

       Small Claims Court,

       Limited Jurisdiction Superior Court, or

       Unlimited Jurisdiction Superior Court.  

   Venue:

   Jurisdiction says in what State and what Court you file your lawsuit. Venue is the County where you file your action. Usually, this is the County where the defendant lives or where the injury happened. But, sometimes you can change the Venue. See Law and Motion.

   Court locations/hours/maps:

   See the list of courthouses. Click on each court to see the hours and maps.

   Unlimited Jurisdiction cases:

   If you have a case worth more than $25,000, you have an unlimited jurisdiction case. For these cases, you have to give the Clerk:

       The Complaint, or petition,

       A Civil Case Cover Sheet ,

       The filing fee (see the local fee schedule ), and

       An original copy of the Summons.

       The Clerk will endorse the Complaint, the Cover Sheet and the Summons, and give them back to you with something called a “Civil Lawsuit Notice”. This tells the date and time of your first Court hearing, and which Department (courthouse and courtroom) and Judge your case is assigned to.

       You’ll also get an ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Information

Explanation:

Answer:

“. . . We have come to our nation’s capital to cash a check.  When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall Heir.”

-Martin Luther King, Jr., “I Have a Dream” Speech, August 1963, March on Washington

Should the American Independence movement be interpreted as a promise that the government will protect the natural rights of all of its citizens?

• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning to defend it.

• Support your claim with at least TWO pieces of accurate and relevant information:

At least ONE piece of evidence must be from one of the following foundational documents:

The above question seeks to assess your argumentation capacity and your interpretation of the national policy. For that reason, I can't write the argument for you, but I'll show you how to write one.

First, you must analyze how the role of the President of the Republic has changed over the years and how these changes have modified the power the President has in the country.

During this research, you must decide if, in your opinion, the president has very strong powers that are dangerous to society.

You should do this based on the documents indicated in the question and based on articles dealing with this subject.

Based on that, you can write your argument as follows:

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/18468191?referrer=searchResults