Defamation per se allows a plaintiff to recover damages without proving actual damage to their reputation.
False statements of fact that damage someone else's reputation are included in the tort of defamation. Libel and slander are the two main subcategories of defamation. While slander generally refers to oral defamation, much spoken speech that has a written transcript also falls under the definition of libel. Libel generally refers to written defamation.
The four main classifications of defamation per se are as follows: indications of a person's involvement in crime, signs that a person had a contagious or infectious disease that was "loathsome", indications that a person was sexually immoral or unchaste, indications that a person engaged in behavior that was inconsistent with how his business, trade, or profession should have been conducted. It allows a plaintiff to recover damages without proving actual damage to their reputation.
Know more about "Defamation" visit
brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ4
marbury and his attorney, former attorney general charles lee, maintained that the commission's signing and sealing sealed the deal
Marbury and his attorney argued that the signing and sealing of the commission by the President constituted a binding agreement, but the Supreme Court disagreed in Marbury v. Madison.
Marbury and his attorney, former Attorney General Charles Lee, argued that the signing and sealing of the commission by the President constituted a valid and binding agreement, thereby entitling Marbury to his judicial appointment. They claimed that the act of signing and sealing the commission completed the deal and created a legally enforceable right.
Their argument was based on the following points:
1. Offer and Acceptance: Marbury argued that the President's nomination and subsequent signing and sealing of the commission constituted an offer, and Marbury's acceptance was demonstrated by his acceptance of the appointment.
2. Consideration: Marbury contended that he provided consideration for the appointment by accepting the responsibilities and duties associated with the judicial office.
3. Legal Validity: Marbury and Lee asserted that the act of signing and sealing the commission indicated the President's intention to create a legally binding appointment.
However, the Supreme Court, in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803), held that Marbury's claim was not valid. The Court ruled that although the commission was validly signed and sealed, Marbury's remedy was not through the courts but rather through a writ of mandamus, which the Court found to be unconstitutional in this particular case.
Learn more about Attorney
https://brainly.com/question/32365817
#SPJ11
Question 16
2 pts
erma enters into a contract to buy a tract of lakefront property from forest acres to build and sell a
residential development. forest acres fails to close the sale. erma's remedy is most likely
the amount that erma invested in the project to the date of the closing.
o nothing-forest acres still owns the land.
o the difference between the contract and market prices of the land.
specific performance.
question 17
2 pts
The "Contract Price" refers to the specific price that a given buyer and seller have decided upon to sell a particular house. The Appraised Value is a certified assessment of what the market as a whole could be willing to pay for a house.
Can the price on a contract be changed?Typically, neither you nor the vendor has the authority to unilaterally alter the conditions. However, some agreements are made with the option for price adjustments in case project size and scope change in the future.
What drives market pricing?The combination between supply and demand determines market pricing. The balance between supply and demand determines an equilibrium price.
To know more about Contract Price visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/14450413
#SPJ4
What kind of order does the U.S. Supreme Court issue to indicate it will review a case?
A. Writ of certiorari
B. Majority Opinion
C. Summary Judgement
D. Writ of Habeas Corpus
Explain your reasoning for choosing this answer:
Answer:
A. Writ of certiorari
Explanation:
Writ of certiorari - An order issued by the Supreme Court directing the lower court to transmit records for a case for which it will hear on appeal. The Supreme Court is usually not required to hear appeals of cases.
The failure on the part of a police officer to accurately document in a report the reasons why an individual was stopped, questioned without
having been provided information regarding his constitutional rights, and subsequently arrested as a suspect in unnamed criminal activity
would violate which provisions of the Bill of Rights? Select all that apply.
the First Amendment right to free speech
the Sixth Amendment right of an individual to be informed of the charges pending against him or her
the Fifth Amendment right to due process
the Second Amendment right to bear arms
Answer:
It would be a violation of the person's sixth amendment and fifth amendment rights!
Explanation:
It would not be a violation of their first amendment or their second amendment. Sixth amendment violation because the cop did not inform the person of the accused crimes. Fifth amendment violation because the cop did not provide information to the accused of their constitutional rights.
mention 4ways in which the rule of law could protect community members whose private property was damaged during a protest action
During demonstrations or other times of civil unrest, protecting community people and their property is crucial. Only by upholding the rule of law can we make sure that those who violate the law are held accountable and that justice is done.
What is rule of law?According to the political idea known as "the rule of law," all individuals and institutions within a nation, state, or community, including legislators and other top officials, are subject to the same laws.
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the rule of law is "the system, method, institution, practice, or norm that maintains the equality of all individuals before the law, ensures a nonarbitrary type of government, and more generally avoids the arbitrary use of authority."
Learn more about rule of law, from:
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ9
a litigant who seeks to have the u.s. supreme court rule on his or her case will file a petition for:
A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari," which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case.
However, the Supreme Court is not required to grant review. Only when a case concerns an extremely significant legal concept or when two or more federal appellate courts have disagreed on how to interpret a statute will the Court normally consent to consider it. Additionally, there are a few unique instances in which the Supreme Court is mandated by law to consider an appeal.
To know more about litigant visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28945859
#SPJ4
Beethoven lost his hearing but continued to write music by doing what?
A.
transcribing what he heard
B.
getting help from friends
C.
feeling the frequencies of the notes on the piano sounding board
D.
listening intently
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I hope I helped!
Answer:
C) feeling the frequencies of the notes on the piano sounding board is the answer you are looking for :)
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :)
What can be derived from a firearm and its projectiles?
Firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
What informs firearms and their projectiles?Firearms and their projectiles can provide a wealth of information to investigators and forensic experts in criminal investigations, as well as to engineers and researchers studying the performance and characteristics of firearms.
From a firearm, one can determine its make, model, and caliber. The firearm's serial number can also be used to trace its ownership and history. The condition of the firearm can provide information about its maintenance and use.
From the projectile, one can determine the caliber, type of bullet, and the angle of impact. The projectile's trajectory can be used to determine the location of the shooter and the direction of the shot.
Forensic experts can also analyze the gunshot residue left on the firearm and the shooter's hands to determine if the person fired the weapon. The presence of fingerprints or DNA on the firearm can also be used to identify the shooter.
Overall, firearms and their projectiles can provide important clues and evidence in criminal investigations and can help experts better understand the performance and characteristics of firearms.
learn more about Firearms and their projectiles: https://brainly.com/question/30244650
#SPJ1
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
How are the inferior federal courts created?
What is the name given to the first clause of a will in which the testator sets forth his or her name and domicile and states that he revokes all previous wills and codicils made by him or her?
Answer:
exordium clause OR publication clause
Explanation:
describtion of this clause:
The introductory paragraph setting out the full name and domincile of the testator and stating that they revoke all previous wills and codicils made at an earlier time.
What happens when a party with the right to avoid a contract chooses to not avoid it?.
If a party with the power to reject the contract chooses not to reject the contract despite the defect, the contract remains valid and enforceable.
The legal cancellation of an agreement due to the fact an occasion occurs that makes the overall performance of the settlement phrases not possible or inequitable and that releases the events from their obligations.
Avoidance with respect to the unmarried installment is allowed if a party devoted a fundamental breach with respect to that single installment; avoidance of the agreement as a whole can be claimed in which the essential breach worries the whole agreement (Article seventy-three).
Learn more about contracts here https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
Source documents, such as a canceled check, should be kept on file for _______. Multiple Choice The Balance Sheet preparation Profit and Loss statement Tax purposes None of the choices are correct
Source documents, such as a canceled check, should be kept on file for tax purposes.
Source documents are any documents that provide evidence of a transaction or event. These may include canceled checks, bank statements, invoices, receipts, and other financial records.
By keeping these documents on file, taxpayers can demonstrate that they have accurately reported their income and deductions on their tax returns.
Canceled checks, in particular, are important source documents because they provide evidence of payment. When a check is canceled, it means that the payment has been processed and funds have been transferred from one account to another.
By keeping canceled checks on file, taxpayers can show that they have made payments for deductible expenses, such as business expenses or charitable donations.
In general, it is recommended that taxpayers keep source documents on file for at least three years from the date the tax return was filed or the due date of the tax return, whichever is later. This is because the IRS generally has three years from the date a return was filed to initiate an audit or assess additional tax.
Overall, keeping source documents, such as canceled checks, on file is an important part of tax record-keeping. These documents serve as proof of transactions and provide evidence to support deductions and credits on tax returns.
By keeping accurate records and retaining source documents, taxpayers can minimize their risk of an IRS audit and ensure that they are prepared in the event of an audit.
To learn more about source documents, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/207486
#SPJ11
HURRY PLEASE
Question 1
protesting and refusing to serve in World War I was found to be unprotected speech by the Supreme Court. What reason would allow them to limit in individuals right to speak and protest?
A. clear and present danger
B. fighting words
C. Libel
D. Conflict with government interests
Explanation:
The answer is D. because Wilson declared it would restrict public criticism because it would undermine support for the war effort.
Answer:
A. clear and present danger
Explanation:
What reason would allow them to limit in individuals right to speak and protest = clear and present danger
How many party systems are there?
the law creates a system to resolve disputes by recognizing legal and interests of the parties involved.
The law creates a system to resolve the disputes of the parties by recognizing the legal rights as well as the interests of the involved parties.
The legal rights may be termed or referred to as the rights that are provided to a specific set of person under the lawful documents related to the same. These rights are completely regulated, and provide protection to those who hold them. Moreover, the legal rights are also under the scrutiny of the government bodies, formed specifically for the purpose.
Learn more about legal rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/28024586
#SPJ4
Complete question
the law creates a system to resolve disputes by recognizing legal _______ and interests of the parties involved.
managing security operations
Answer:
thats not a question
Explanation:
Guided Practice
In what form of government does one person or a small group of people hold all of the power?
A. a constitution
B. a legislature
c. a democracy
D. a dictatorship
which federal law made substantive changes to hipaa
Federal law made substantive changes to HIPAA is option A. HITECH Act.
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, enacted in 2009, made significant amendments to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The HITECH Act aimed to strengthen privacy and security protections for health information, promote the adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs), and encourage the meaningful use of health information technology.
Under the HITECH Act, the scope of HIPAA's Privacy and Security Rules was expanded, and it increased penalties for non-compliance with HIPAA regulations. The Act also introduced mandatory reporting for security breaches involving Protected Health Information (PHI), promoting transparency and accountability.
In summary, the HITECH Act is the federal law that made substantive changes to HIPAA, enhancing privacy and security measures, and supporting the shift towards electronic health records and technology in the healthcare industry. Therefore the correct option A
The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
content loaded
which federal law made substantive changes to HIPAA?
a -HITECH Act
b -Graham-Leach-Bliley Act
c -Electronic Communication Act
d -Patient Safety and Quality Act
e -Health Care and Education Act.
Know more about HITECH Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/14479515
#SPJ11
The HITECH Act made substantive changes to HIPAA.
Explanation:The federal law that made substantive changes to HIPAA is the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) passed in 2009.
Learn more about HITECH Act here:https://brainly.com/question/34584036
#SPJ6
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
Find the Michigan statute which sets forth the procedure for summary proceedings to recover possession of
premises (that is, summary proceedings for a landlord to use to recover possession of leased premises when the
lessee "holds over" and stays in the premises after failing or refusing to pay rent due under the lease for more
than seven days after the landlord has made a written demand for payment).
1. Give the citation for that statute (i.e., the chapter and section within the Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated;
there may be more than one statute meeting the criterion; you only need to give one).
2. State when the statute, as most recently amended, became effective.
The statute in Michigan which sets forth the procedure for summary proceedings to recover possession of premises is Chapter 600, Section 5701, of the Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated (MCLA 600.5701).
The statute, as most recently amended, became effective on March 20, 2020.
This chapter of the Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated provides for summary proceedings for a landlord to recover possession of leased premises when the tenant holds over and remains in the premises after failing or refusing to pay rent due under the lease for more than seven days after the landlord has made a written demand for payment. MCLA 600.5701 is one of several statutes in Michigan that establishes procedures for summary proceedings for possession.
Learn more about Michigan:
https://brainly.com/question/28796083
#SPJ11
At the scene of a murder, Investigator Evans is trying to determine whether the victim knew their attacker. She has collected the murder weapon, a baseball bat that had rolled under the couch. The medical examiner has determined that the time of death was about four hours ago. Investigator Evans notes that the door frame has some splintered pieces. There is also a grocery bag sitting on the kitchen counter. Which fact is most relevant to the investigator's question?
Answer:
Most likely, the victim could have been followed home from the grocery store. or the victim was murdered by a neighborhood thief who snuck in to get the drop on her. or a recent lover or family member who was seeking revenge. the door indicates that there was forced entry, so she had already been home from the store, but not for too long cause she had yet to put the groceries away. the killer wasn't worried about leaving the weapon, so it's either a lousy killer or a killer who wants to be caught. we will rule out the possibility of a robbery. She probably knew her killer given the facts that we have.
How can the Magna Carta be considered a revolutionary document??
Answer:
Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial
You are approaching an intersection where you want to turn right, and the light is green. You should
You are approaching an intersection where you want to turn right, and the light is green. You should slow down to a safe turning speed before entering the intersection.
How do you drive at intersection?If you are approaching an intersection where you want to turn right and the light is green, you should proceed with caution and be aware of any pedestrians or other vehicles that may be crossing your path. Make sure to signal your intention to turn right, and slow down to an appropriate speed as you approach the turn.
Look both ways before making the turn and ensure that the way is clear before proceeding. If there are other vehicles in the intersection or you are unsure of the situation, it may be best to wait for the light to turn red before making your turn. Always prioritize safety and follow all traffic laws and regulations.
Learn more about intersection at:
https://brainly.com/question/10428039
#SPJ1
The images show what happened to two people who invested $1,000.
Gale starts with $1,000.
Gale's investments:
- Savings account: $200,1% retum
- Mutual fund: $600, 7% return
- Stock:
$200, -10% return
Alex starts with $1,000.
Alex's investments:
- Stock:
$1,000, -10%
return
Value one year later:
Profit:
$1,024
$24
Value one year later:
Profit:
$900
($100)
Which investment advice would Gale most likely give to Alex?
The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
What are mutual funds?A mutual fund is an organization that brings collectively cash from many human beings and invests it in stocks, bonds, or different properties.
The mixed holdings of stocks, bonds, or different properties the fund owns are called its portfolio.
Hence, The investment advice that Gale most likely to Alex is to invest in Mutual funds, as an investment in mutual funds will have a better return than any other investment.
learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/3151209
#SPJ5
The best investing advice Gale would probably provide Alex is to put money into mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than other types of investments.
What is mutual fund?A mutual fund is a business that pools the money from several investors and uses it to buy stocks, bonds, or other types of real estate. The portfolio of the fund refers to its assortment of stocks, bonds, and various real estate interests.
The primary investments of mutual funds are frequently categorized as money market funds, bond or fixed income funds, stock or equity funds, or hybrid funds. Index funds, which are passively managed funds that follow the performance of an index, are another classification for funds. As a result, Gale will probably advise Alex to invest in mutual funds since they will yield a higher return than any other type of investment.
Learn more about mutual funds here:
https://brainly.com/question/31417979
#SPJ7
Probably the full options are:
A. mutual fund
B. natural resources
C. government bonds
D. certificate of deposit
If mediation is chosen as a form of dispute resolution, it will be:___________
a. a mandatory process.
b. binding on all the parties.
c. a voluntary process.
d. not available in international disputes.
Answer:
C. A voluntary process.
Explanation:
I majored in Law.
what is the source(s) of law the court would have to look to in order to decide which state is the correct place for the lawsuit to be brought? (constitution? common law ? a statute? a regulation? )
The court would have to look to a variety of sources of law in order to decide which state is the correct place for the lawsuit to be brought. These sources may include the constitution, common law, statutes, and regulations. In particular, the court may consider any relevant state or federal laws that govern the subject matter of the lawsuit,
as well as any applicable rules of civil procedure or jurisdictional rules that determine where a case may be brought. Ultimately, the court's decision will be based on a careful analysis of all relevant legal authorities and the facts of the case.
To determine the correct place for a lawsuit to be brought, the court would primarily look at the jurisdiction and venue rules, which are derived from a combination of sources, including statutes, regulations, and common law. In some cases, constitutional provisions may also be relevant. The specific source of law will depend on the jurisdiction and the nature of the case.
learn more about lawsuit
https://brainly.com/question/19573641
#SPJ11
In order to have a valid contract, a landlord must sign a lease but a tenant can sign or:
a. move in
b. pay rent
c. do none of these
d. either move in or pay rent
In order to have a valid contract, both parties, landlord and tenant, must agree to the terms and sign the lease agreement. The lease agreement outlines the terms and conditions of the tenancy, including the rental amount, security deposit, and lease duration. The landlord's signature shows their agreement to rent the property to the tenant under the agreed-upon terms, while the tenant's signature indicates their agreement to abide by those terms and pay the rent.
However, in some cases, a tenant may be allowed to move in without signing a lease, but they must still pay rent. Nonetheless, it's essential to have access and signed lease agreement to ensure that both parties are legally bound to the terms of the tenancy.
To learn more about access click here: brainly.com/question/29910451
#SPJ11
when thinking about checks and balances and separation of powers, _____ gives congress the ability to check both the president and the supreme court.
The system of checks and balances in the United States gives Congress the ability to check both the President and the Supreme Court through its powers of impeachment, oversight, and the power of the purse. This allows Congress to hold the President and federal judges accountable for their actions, and to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful.
The legislative branch, which is represented by Congress, has several key powers that allow it to check the actions of the other two branches. One of these powers is the ability to impeach the President and other federal officials, including judges. This means that if Congress believes that a President or judge has committed a serious crime or abuse of power, it can vote to remove that person from office.
Another important power of Congress is the ability to conduct oversight of the executive branch and its agencies. This means that Congress can review and investigate the actions of the President and his or her administration, and can hold hearings to question officials about their policies and actions. This allows Congress to ensure that the President and his or her administration are acting in the best interests of the American people.
Finally, Congress has the power of the purse, which means that it controls the federal government's budget and can use this power to influence the actions of the President and other federal officials. By controlling the budget, Congress can direct funding to specific programs and agencies, and can also use the threat of cutting funding to exert pressure on the President and other officials to take certain actions or to change their policies.
All of these powers, along with the power to pass laws and approve appointments, give Congress the ability to check both the President and the Supreme Court. This helps to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful and that the powers of government are balanced between the three branches.
Learn more about the United States government and politics here: https://brainly.com/question/28152248
#SPJ4
Read Shelly v Kraeme, Moose Lodge v. Irvis and Georgia v. Mccollum.
Which case is most compelling?
Answer:
Georgia v. Mccollum.
Explanation: