which of the following best explains the three laws of mastery?

A comparable worth system takes into consideration the educational requirements, skills, tasks, and responsibilities of fundamentally different jobs to reduce the wage gap.

This is the term that is used to refer to the system that takes cognition of the work that is done by the females and the minorities and tries to bridge the gap that existed with the pay that the men receive.

Hence we can say that the comparable worth system takes into consideration the educational requirements, skills, tasks, and responsibilities of fundamentally different jobs to reduce the wage gap.

Read more on wage systems here: https://brainly.com/question/25863464

#SPJ1

In this case, Pete is liable for the damages to Ruth

Why does this happen?

According to the law, employers are liable for the actions of their employees. It is the duty of the employer to provide time to time training to their employees and teach them to be limit and rules and regulations. Damage caused by Quincy will be liability of Pete's Pizza now.

It will be considered as a mistake of the company, and currently, the company is liable for the actions of their employees. The needs of the company would differ and has contracts, conditions with the other company as well.

Hence, In this case Pete is liable for the damages to Ruth

To learn more about Liability from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/9503055

#SPJ4

The lawyer is not permitted to reveal what Consuela told her about the reason she was taking the route. Thus the correct answer is D: "No, because Consuela's detour from her regular route fails to provide evidence proving she is not guilty".

The reason for Consuela's detour is not relevant to the criminal charge against her, which is being an accessory to murder. Revealing the reason for the detour would violate the attorney-client privilege, which protects communications between a lawyer and client from disclosure. This privilege exists to encourage clients to be candid with their lawyers, which allows lawyers to provide effective legal representation. Therefore, the lawyer cannot reveal this information without the client's consent.

Learn more about attorney-client privilege https://brainly.com/question/30332486

#SPJ11

Answer: i can't draw a sketch but this is what i imagine that there is blood on the floor and there is a dead body as well and  in the body there are knife stabs and there are 7 of them

Explanation:

It is True that when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was formed in 1970, environmental policy was indeed a polarizing issue, pitting Democrats against Republicans.

The 1960s and early 1970s were marked by growing public concern about environmental issues, including pollution, toxic waste, and the depletion of natural resources.

This concern was fueled in part by high-profile environmental disasters, such as the 1969 oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara, California, and the 1970 fire on the Cuyahoga River in Ohio, which was so polluted that it caught fire.

While many Democrats were pushing for stronger environmental protections, Republicans were generally more skeptical of government intervention in the private sector.

This divide was reflected in Congress, where environmental legislation was often fiercely contested along party lines. For example, the Clean Air Act of 1970 passed with the support of only 60% of Republicans in the House and Senate, compared to 84% of Democrats.

In this context, the creation of the EPA was seen as a major victory for environmental advocates, as it signaled a commitment on the part of the federal government to address pressing environmental issues.

However, the agency's work has continued to be contentious, with Republicans generally favoring less regulation and more industry-friendly policies, while Democrats tend to push for more robust environmental protections.

For more question on "Environmental Protection Agency" :

https://brainly.com/question/14956213

#SPJ11

The most significant challenge that law enforcement faces is that the criminal justice system's three major issues are police retention and recruitment, a lack of resource parity between prosecution as well as public defenders, and public perception.

Currently, police recruitment and retention are arguably the most serious issues confronting the criminal justice system.

Law enforcement is evolving at a rapid pace. New types of crime, advanced technologies, and changing relationships with communities are all reshaping the very foundations of police work. New tools and a new police strategy are required, one that goes beyond simply enforcement or community engagement. However, success with these changes will necessitate a shift in the culture of many departments.

Learn more about law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29422434

#SPJ1

The federal initiative that is designed to encourage organizations to address how critical operations will continue under a broad range of negative circumstances is:

D. COOP (Continuity of Operations).

COOP stands for Continuity of Operations. COOP is a federal initiative that aims to ensure that organizations can maintain essential functions and continue operations during and after various disruptive events, such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, or other emergencies.

The purpose of COOP is to minimize downtime, mitigate risks, and enable organizations to quickly recover and resume critical operations in adverse conditions. It involves developing comprehensive plans, strategies, and procedures to address potential threats and disruptions, including backup systems, alternate work locations, and communication protocols.

Learn more about federal initiatives: https://brainly.com/question/28301283

#SPJ11

Answer:

The legislative procedure comprises three main phases: the tabling of the text, its examination by the Parliament and its promulgation by the President of the Republic (after a possible referral to the Constitutional Council for examination of the conformity of the text with the Constitution).

A bill goes through all stages of the legislative process through "a long series of standard motions" on which the House must vote favorably before the bill can become law. [123].

Explanation:

If the front bumper is 3-6 inches from the white parking line, the line of sight will extend from the driver near the side view mirror

To know more about Mirror here

https://brainly.com/question/8737441

#SPJ4

Answer:

The President is the one who is most likely to follow opinion polls when making government decisions, given that it is a one-man and clearly personalist position, which means that, in case of making decisions that are contrary to the majority opinions, it will impact decisively in its political image in the face of society. On the other hand, both the Senate and the House of Representatives are plural organisms, with which their members are less individualizable and, therefore, are less exposed to public opinion.

Answer:House of Representative members

Explanation:

Representatives run for election every two years and must constantly raise campaign money. They abide by public opinion because do not have time to explain their actions or mend fences before each election.

I hope this helps! If it doesnt then just look it up on google i guess lol

From the question given we evaluated statements concerning the recognition of traditional communities in South Africa, the discontinuation of courts of Traditional leaders, and the criminal liability of children under African customary law.

1. The statement is correct. Section 2 of the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003 provides that traditional communities must meet certain criteria to be recognized by the state. The Act specifies that traditional communities must have a distinct cultural identity, a traditional leader, and a system of governance that is recognized by the community members.

2. The statement is incorrect. The Constitution ofb recognizes traditional leadership and courts, and provides for their continued existence. Traditional leaders have a role to play in the administration of justice, and the Constitution recognizes their jurisdiction in certain areas.

3. The statement is incorrect. In terms of African customary law, a child can be held criminally liable for their actions. However, the age of criminal responsibility varies between different African countries and cultures. In South Africa, for example, children under the age of 10 cannot be held criminally liable, while children between the ages of 10 and 14 are presumed to lack criminal capacity unless it can be proved that they knew the wrongfulness of their actions.

Learn more on traditional governance here;

https://brainly.com/question/30374769

#SPJ1

Answer:

no its says to stand up for those who cant stand up but ethier way if u wanna stand up for that then do it you dont have to follow it we sin but be you

Explanation: Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.”

Answer:

we live because we were brought to this word by God to feel the pains and suffering of humanity even though we won't know what the future holds for us or even though we all die at the end it our Faith . Jesus also died for our sins because that was his faith .

Was this helpful either Yes/ No

Answer:

True

Explanation:

I see no question so I will assume this is a true/false question in which case makes this statement provided to be true.

Answer: Thank you for sharing this news release. It appears that Senators Durbin, Lee, Coons, and Wicker have introduced the Smarter Pretrial Detention for Drug Charges Act, which aims to eliminate the blanket presumption of pretrial detention for most federal drug charges. The bill is bipartisan and seeks to provide judges with more flexibility when determining pretrial detention or release.

The news release notes that pretrial detention rates in the federal system have been rising, and the Smarter Pretrial Detention for Drug Charges Act would address this issue by giving judges more discretion in making pretrial detention decisions. The bill would also establish clear guidelines for judges to follow when considering whether to detain or release a defendant before trial, taking into account factors such as the defendant's flight risk and potential danger to the community.

By eliminating the blanket presumption of pretrial detention for most federal drug charges, this bill would provide greater fairness and due process for defendants, while also promoting public safety. The bill has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee for further consideration.

Answer:

depends on if "helping " resulted in doing something illegal, then yes. commit a crime, despite the reason, you should be charged

Explanation:

Answer:

Well honestly it depends on the situation.

Explanation:

You shouldn't be charged with committing a crime if you are just standing there cause you could make it worse, and could be tried for obstruction.

2. No they shouldn't be charged cause they had good intentions. But that's for a jury to decide and the evidence.

Increased reliance on civilian volunteers and privatization is a cause for concern.

This is the process in which an entity is transferred from the public to private sector.

Hiring of civilian volunteers in policing is to ensure that hidden crimes are reported in the society. It is however a cause for concern because of the issue of bias and abuse of power.

Read more about Privatization here https://brainly.com/question/1086126

#SPJ1

Answer:

That is a good question...

Explanation:

holy...

Answer:

I'm very low at mathematics

The City of Milwaukie is a party in the case because it is being sued by the plaintiffs, Helen Sollars (aka Helen Kelly) and the Estate of Helene Valoff.

It is named as the defendant because it is the party being accused of some wrongdoing.The City of Milwaukie failed to appear or file any documents with the Court of Appeals because it might have decided not to contest the lawsuit or decided not to pursue any further legal action regarding the case. This may be due to various reasons, such as a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs or an acknowledgment of the plaintiffs' claims. As a result, the Court of Appeals may have made a default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.

Learn more about plaintiffs here:

https://brainly.com/question/30714126

#SPJ2

A detailed answer to your question is that while Nashville, Tennessee may pass an ordinance to regulate waste disposal within its city limits, waste disposal may also be regulated by other entities.

For example, the state of Tennessee may have its own regulations regarding waste disposal, as well as federal regulations set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Additionally, certain types of waste, such as hazardous waste, may be subject to specialized regulations and requirements.

To provide a long answer, waste disposal is a complex issue that involves various factors, including public health, environmental protection, and economic considerations. Waste can take many forms, such as solid waste, hazardous waste, medical waste, and electronic waste, and each type of waste may require specific methods of disposal to prevent harm to people and the environment.

To regulate waste disposal, local governments may establish ordinances that set rules for how waste should be collected, transported, and disposed of within their jurisdiction. For example, Nashville's waste disposal ordinance may require residents and businesses to use certain types of waste containers or to separate recyclable materials from non-recyclable waste.

However, these local regulations are often supplemented by state and federal regulations that set minimum standards for waste disposal. For instance, the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation oversees the state's solid waste program, which includes regulations for landfill operations, waste reduction, and recycling. Meanwhile, the EPA regulates hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which establishes rules for how hazardous waste must be handled, transported, and disposed of.

In summary, waste disposal can be regulated by multiple entities, and regulations can vary depending on the type of waste and the location where it is generated. A comprehensive understanding of waste disposal regulations requires an explanation of the different types of waste and the regulatory agencies involved, as well as an in-depth analysis of specific regulations that apply to a particular situation.

Learn more about waste disposal

https://brainly.com/question/2724332

#SPJ11

Rex believes that the government must make sure that citizens' personal freedoms are safeguarded, option A is right.

Rex supports individual liberties, whilst his buddy Diana supports public order. Diana thinks that prison terms for violent felons should be increased. This assertion does not, however, necessarily sum up her position on the balance between public safety and individual liberty. Rex's position on the balance between personal freedoms and public safety also cannot be deduced from the material provided.

A supporter of the employment of criminal justice interventions to uphold public order is known as a public-order advocate, and they frequently place the protection of the community before individual rights. The general well-being of the American people, or society, is public order.

To know more about advocates, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/17027382

#SPJ4

Complete question is:

Rex is an​ individual-rights advocate, and Diana is a​ public-order advocate. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this​ case?

A. Rex believes that the state has to ensure the protection of​ citizens' personal freedom.

B. Rex believes that public security takes precedence over individual liberties.

C. Diana believes that even hardcore criminals should be allowed to exercise their criminal rights.

D. Diana believes that prison officials should be held accountable for​ prisoners' safety.

When driving and someone runs a red light in front of you and you decide not to slow down or steer away, you will B. not be at fault if there is a collision.

If someone runs a red light, then they would have gone against traffic laws which could lead to an accident if they collide with someone that is coming from a side of the road with a green light.

If you are that person who was coming from the area with a green light and you collided with the person coming from the lane with a red light, you will not be at fault.

This is regardless of if you willfully did not turn away or slow down. You did not break the traffic law and so you cannot be not at fault because the person who ran the red light is the one who committed an offence.

In conclusion, option B is correct.

Find out more on running the red light at https://brainly.com/question/1266409

#SPJ1

The lawsuit's jurisdiction and circumstances will determine the company's liability. If a firm committed an advertisement error recklessly or with the aim to mislead consumers, it may be responsible. If the corporation is responsible, engage an attorney.

Generally, Whether or not the company is liable in this situation would depend on the specific circumstances and laws in the jurisdiction where the lawsuit is taking place.

In general, a company may be held liable for a mistake in advertising if it is determined that the mistake was made negligently or with intent to deceive customers.

However, if the mistake was made in good faith and was an honest mistake, the company may not be held liable

Additionally, if the advertisement clearly states that prices are subject to change or that mistakes may occur, the company may have a stronger defense against liability.

It would be best to consult with an attorney to determine if the company is liable in this case.

Read more about Willis music

https://brainly.com/question/28000528

#SPJ1

Answer: True

I am very happy to help you.

Explanation:

Answer:

1. Katarungang Pambarangay is an innovation of the Philippine justice system. It provides for resolution of disputes at the barangay level in order to achieve peace and harmony within the community and to provide an accessible and effective form of justice for community members.

2.Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation, conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts.