Answer:
Harvard law school
Explanation:
As the Historical jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law.
What is a law?In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts.
It is possible to think of this school as the school of the evolutionary process. Its emphasis is still on the development and history of the legal system. it holds that prior laws and rulings will continue to be valid in the present and the future.
Therefore, As a result, By the historic school of thought relies the most on precedent in establishing law
Learn more about the law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ6
Opioid Epidemic Response: Place yourself in the role of the leader of substance abuse treatment for a state health agency (e.g., Louisiana Department of Health, Office of Behavioral Health). You have been tasked to design a response to the growing crisis in the state of your choice. At minimum, you must:
a. Tell me the state you are using for this response
b. Find some data to support the need for your intervention(s) you describe
i. Be able to describe your target problem population (who uses opioids in your
state)
ii. Relate your target population to national statistics
c. Evaluate programs already in operation that look promising for your target population
d. Describe your top priority intervention to begin to respond to this crisis
e. Estimate the cost of your intervention
REAL ANSWERS ONLY!!!!
NO LINKS!!!!
According to the CDC, Louisiana had the 10th highest rate of drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2020.
How to explain the informationThe target population for my intervention is individuals who are currently using opioids in Louisiana.
According to the CDC, an estimated 721,000 people in Louisiana used opioids in 2020. The opioid crisis is a national problem. In 2020, there were over 93,000 drug overdose deaths in the United States, and over 70% of those deaths involved opioids.
There are a number of existing programs in Louisiana that are designed to address the opioid crisis. These programs include:
The Louisiana State Opioid Response (LaSOR) Program, which provides funding for prevention, treatment, and recovery services for individuals with or at risk for opioid use disorder.
The Louisiana Opioid Crisis Response Fund, which provides funding for community-based organizations that are working to address the opioid crisis.
My top priority intervention is to expand access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. This includes increasing the number of treatment providers, expanding insurance coverage for treatment, and reducing the stigma associated with addiction.
The estimated cost of expanding access to MAT in Louisiana is $50 million per year. This cost would be offset by the savings in healthcare costs.
Learn more about epidemics on
https://brainly.com/question/24222732
#SPJ1
Evaluate the success or failures of the competition policy in South Africa using current examples
The success of the competition policy of South Africa lead to:
The product choices as well as with its competitive prices were given to consumers. Market Practices e.g. horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was deemed unlawful.What is the competition policy in South Africa?The aim of the Competition Act of 1998 is to boasr and maintain competition in South Africa as it was enacted to:
To promote efficiency.The development of the economy as well as others.Therefore, The success of the competition policy of South Africa lead to:
The product choices as well as with its competitive prices were given to consumers. Market Practices e.g. horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was deemed unlawful.Learn more about South Africa from
https://brainly.com/question/1056948
#SPJ1
A buyer entered into a written contract with a seller to purchase his commercial property for $100,000. The contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed, and made no mention of easements or reservations. The closing was set for November 25, three months from the signing of the contract. Shortly thereafter, the buyer obtained a survey of the property, which revealed that the city had an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Because this actually enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not mention it to the seller. Subsequently, the buyer found a better location for her business. On November 1, the buyer notified the seller that she no longer intended to purchase the property. The seller told her that he intended to hold her to her contract. At closing, the buyer refused to tender the purchase price, claiming that the seller's title is unmarketable and citing the sidewalk easement as proof of that fact. In a suit for specific performance, will the seller likely prevail? A: Yes, because the contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed. B: Yes, because the buyer was aware of the visible easement and it enhanced the value of the property. C: No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders title unmarketable. D: No, because the buyer gave the seller sufficient notice of her change in plans and yet he made no effort to try to find another purchaser.
No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.
The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.
Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.
The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.
Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32959753
#SPJ11
Which of the following policies would be classified as a traditional level premium contract?
Answer:
Level-premium insurance is a type of term life insurance. With this type of coverage, premiums are guaranteed to remain the same throughout the contract, while the amount of coverage provided increases. Premiums are averaged over the term of the policy.
What is the difference between Political Legitimacy and Political Efficacy
Answer:Legitimacy is when a government's constituents believe their government has the right to use power in the way it does
Explanation:
Some scientists are studying the frogs in a pond near a factory. The factory has been known to dump old chemicals in a gutter that sometimes leaks into the pond. The scientists suspect that the chemicals may be causing the frogs to die before they can lay eggs. They decide to compare the frogs in this pond to the frogs in a pond with clean water.
If you were one of these scientists, what might be your hypothesis?
Here's the sample response:
If the first pond contains chemicals, then it will have fewer frogs because the chemicals will kill the frogs before they can lay eggs.
Here's my response that will get you a 100%:
If the first pond contains chemicals, less frogs will be present because the chemicals can destroy the frogs until they can lay eggs.
Are there legal loopholes to avoid getting held back? My child is failing history and geometry and I don’t think she can pass by the end of the year. She is in 9th grade and has been to 3 different schools this year. She is currently in an Online school and will do public next year.
State of residence: South Carolina
Answer:
Explanation:
Legislation signed into law June 30 allows parents and students over 18 to decide for themselves whether they or their kids should repeat their 2020-21 grade. In other years, the decision to hold students back is made by school officials and teachers.
Explain the difference between Personal Injury Protection and Property Damage Liability insurance.
Answer: Property damage liability insurance helps pay for damage to someone else’s car PIP (personal injury protection) covers medical expenses regardless of who’s at fault.
Explanation:
Liability insurance covers costs associated with injuries or property damage sustained by others as a result of an accident that was your fault. PIP, often known as no-fault insurance, pays for your medical bills regardless of who caused the accident.
What is Personal Injury Protection ?In some U.S. states, personal injury protection is an addition to auto insurance that provides coverage for medical costs, maybe lost earnings, and other harms.
Your medical expenses and lost wages are covered by personal injury protection (PIP) insurance if you or your passengers are hurt in a car accident. In most states, PIP is not required.
In most places, having property damage liability insurance is required by law. If you are at blame for an automobile accident that damages another vehicle or piece of property, like a fence or building front, it usually helps cover the cost of repairs.
To learn more about Personal Injury Protection
https://brainly.com/question/16799497
#SPJ3
According to Goldstein, what is the proper role of politics in policing, and what is an improper role?
Criminal justice masterworks : a history of ideas about crime, law, police, and corrections
According to Herman Goldstein, the proper role of politics in policing is allocating resources to ensure adequate problem-oriented policing followed by close monitoring of police activities.
Political influences should not have a place in policing a society. According to Goldstein, policing is itself an aberration in a free society. Adding politics to the activities of the police department will decrease society's freedom and individual liberty and complicate societal relationships.
In dealing with crime and law enforcement, police should be mindful of social and physical disorders and help the government curtail such occurrences. The improper role of politics in policing occurs when policing is used by politicians to subject opposition members to oppression or harassment.
Thus, the proper role of politics in policing is to ensure that there are adequate resources for policing, monitoring the outcome of policing in the society, and not intervening in policing based on political affiliations.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/22808563
why do some communities struggle with water?
Answer: Since 2013, thousands of Californians in the Central Valley are unable to drink water from domestic wells and municipal systems because they are contaminated with nitrates and bacteria from farm and dairy runoff, as well as arsenic, uranium and other harmful industrial chemicals, researchers found.
A shoplifter set a small fire in a store's trash basket. The shoplifter knew that the store's automatic sprinkler system would promptly douse the fire, but his purpose was merely to create a distraction so he could walk out with an expensive watch, which would constitute felony theft. The shoplifter was stopped after he set the fire but before he could take any merchandise. No serious damage was done to the store by the fire, but the flame charred the wall next to the trash basket and blistered the paint on the surrounding area. A statute in the jurisdiction extends the crime of arson to buildings other than dwellings. If the shoplifter is tried for the crime of arson, should the court find him guilty?
A. No, because the shoplifter did not intend to burn the building.
B. No, because the shoplifter's act was sufficient only for attempted arson.
C. Yes, because the shoplifter's conduct demonstrated the requisite state of mind for the crime.
D. Yes, because the shoplifter started the fire during the act of perpetrating another felony.
Yes, because the shoplifter's conduct demonstrated the requisite state of mind for the crime. Option (C)
If the shoplifter is tried for the crime of arson, the court should find him guilty because his conduct demonstrated the required state of mind for the crime. A felony, which is a serious crime, is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year or by death. Attempted arson is also punishable by law, and the shoplifter's act was enough for attempted arson but was insufficient for actual arson.
Felony theft, on the other hand, is theft that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. Arson is defined as the malicious burning of someone else's property. The individual must have had the intention of burning the property, and the fire must have been started intentionally. The shoplifter deliberately started a small fire in the trash can, knowing that the automatic sprinkler system would quickly extinguish it. He set the fire to divert attention away from himself so he could leave the store with an expensive watch. It was also discovered that the statute in that jurisdiction extends the crime of arson to buildings other than dwellings, which means that the shoplifter could be found guilty of arson if he is tried for it.
Learn more about Guilty
https://brainly.com/question/32289528
#SPJ11
The correct answer is option C because the shoplifter's conduct demonstrated the requisite state of mind for the crime.
In this scenario, the shoplifter set a small fire in the store's trash basket as a deliberate act to create a distraction. Although the shoplifter may not have intended to burn down the entire building, their action still constitutes arson. Arson is the act of intentionally starting a fire or causing an explosion that results in damage to property. In this case, the shoplifter's purposeful act of starting a fire, even though it was small and quickly extinguished by the sprinkler system, demonstrates the necessary intent for the crime of arson.
To know more about Arson, visit
https://brainly.com/question/11857936
#SPJ11
The combined dna index system commonly known
Patty is the Plaintiff in a trial and Daryl is the Defendant. Patty and Daryl each call their witnesses, offer their evidence, and presents their side of the case. The parties rest and give their closing statements. The jury finds for Patty. Daryl disagrees with the verdict. Name one option that Daryl can do at this point of the post-trial process and what that option will do for him.
Answer:
Take it to a higher jury
Explanation:
Describe how the role of an appointed judge is different and similar to that of an elected official (3-4 sentences)
Answer:
The role of an appointed judge is different from that of an elected official in several ways. Appointed judges are selected by a governor, president, or another appointing authority and serve for a set term, typically for life or until they reach a certain age. They are expected to make decisions based on the law and the facts of each case, rather than political considerations or public opinion.
However, there are also similarities between the two roles. Both appointed judges and elected officials serve the public and are expected to act with integrity and impartiality. Additionally, both can be removed from office for cause, such as misconduct or a violation of ethical standards. Ultimately, the ultimate goal of both appointed judges and elected officials is to serve the best interests of the public and ensure justice is done.
Match the correct word to the definition.
Question 5 options:
a person who has left his or her home to escape danger such as persecution by the government, war, or natural disaster
the study of the rights and duties of citizens
a member of a community of people who owe loyalty to a government and, in turn, are entitled to its protection
a foreign-born resident of the United States who has not been naturalized
the rights and duties of citizens
1.
Citizen
2.
Civics
3.
Citizenship
4.
Alien
5.
Refugee
Answer:
I'm going to answer your question in order to make more simpler for you :)
1. Refugee
2. Civics
3. Citizens
4. Immigrant or Alien
5. Citizenship
1. Citizen - a member of a community of people who owe loyalty to a government and, in turn, are entitled to its protection.
2. Civics - the study of the rights and duties of citizens.
A citizen is a member of a specific country or nation who holds a legally recognized status and has certain rights, privileges, and responsibilities within that country.
3. Citizenship - a person who has left his or her home to escape danger such as persecution by the government, war, or natural disaster.
4. Alien - a foreign-born resident of the United States who has not been naturalized.
5. Refugee - a person who has left his or her home to escape danger such as persecution by the government, war, or natural disaster.
Learn more about Citizen here:
https://brainly.com/question/455363
#SPJ3
The Victorian legislation which provides guidelines for solicitors to disclose information about costs.
Answer:
costs disclosure
Explanation:
The Victorian legislation provides guidelines for legal fee disclosures by solicitors to their clients. The legislation requires that solicitors must disclose legal costs in a cost disclosure statement as soon as they engage a client. This prevents the penalties or invalidity of a legal claim to costs. Exceptions may however apply where legal costs do not exceed $750 or client is government or commercial entity.
To___means to make someone follow the rules to compel obedience
Answer:
Enforce.
Explanition:
By this, they are enforcing rules. Aka "leading by example."
cộng sản Việt Nam đã vận dụng lí luận chủ nghĩa Mác Lê nin về hình thái kinh tế xã hội vào xây dựng chủ nghĩa xã hội trong thời kì quá độ ở nước ta như thế nào ? rút ra ý nghĩa đối với sinh viên
to find that there is an implied contract or an implied-in-fact contract, the court must deem that: (1) the plaintiff provided some property or service to the defendant; (2) the plaintiff expected to be paid for such property or service; and (3) the defendant had an opportunity to blank , but did not.
To find an implied contract or an implied-in-fact contract, a court must determine that three elements exist:
Firstly, the plaintiff provided some property or service to the defendant. Secondly, the plaintiff had an expectation of receiving payment for the property or service provided. And finally, the defendant had an opportunity to object to the agreement, but failed to do so.
An implied contract is one that is not explicitly stated or written down but is still legally binding. It is inferred from the behavior of the parties involved, rather than from any formal agreement.
An implied-in-fact contract is a type of implied contract that arises from the actions of the parties involved, rather than from any express agreement. In both cases, the key element is the understanding that a contract exists between the parties, even if it was not explicitly stated.
For more questions like Implied contract click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/19908088
#SPJ11
Which group argued for the inclusion of this statement in the U.S. Constitution?
Answer:
The Federalists
Explanation:
One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people.
________ refers to simple exaggerations in advertisements that are not meant to be believed and that are permitted by law.
Puffery
Explanation:
refers to simple exaggeration in advertisements that are not meant to be believed and are are considered illegal
Explaining the job of the specialization of wild land firefighting that you have chosen make sure you cite sources
Answer:
u protect the wild
Explanation:
u protect the wild from fire done
How can victims be better assisted in the criminal justice system
Answer:
You can also refer victims to local advocates who can help them apply for compensation benefits, understand their rights, and navigate the criminal justice system. By doing this, law enforcement officers invest in the well-being of their community and support the recovery of the victims who depend on them.
Is the type of the exception object always the same as the type declared in the catch clause that catches it? if not, why not?.
No, The type of any exception object is not at all same. we can say it as super class for the given sub class which is very well enough to catch all the clause which catches it.
If an exception does now no longer have an identical seize clause, the present day approach terminates and throws the exception to the subsequent better level. If there's no matching seize clause at any better level, then this system terminates with an error. Your software can do something with the exception item that it chooses to.
A seize clause can seize any exception that can be assigned to the Throwable type. This consists of the Error and Exception types. One such exception is the restriction exception ( System. Limit Exception ) that the runtime throws if a governor restriction has been exceeded, which include while the most variety of SQL queries issued has been exceeded.
Learn more about exception visit: brainly.com/question/29526741
#SPJ4
How many motorcyclists were killed in traffic crashes in the United States in 2016
Answer:
5286
Explanation:
Answer: 5,286
Explanation: There were 5,286 reported deaths of motorcyclists in 2016.
Explain factors taken into consideration to determine the similarity of a name for it to be called “undesirable” under section 24 of the Companies Act (Chapter 24:03
Answer:
Explain factors taken into consideration to determine the similarity of a name for it to be called “undesirable”
Explanation:
registered under the Securities Act [Chapter 24:25] or in respect of a ... “secretary” includes any official of a company, by whatever name called, who ... nothing in this Act shall affect the v alidity of the incorporation of any existing ... (b) he considers to be in conflict with the provisions of this section or undesirable for any other.
4. Waste that is generated by a business is called a _____________.
Answer:
Explanation:
waste stream
what responsibility do the media and politicians have to inform the public of the reality of crime? of the real dangers of victimization that exist in a specific area? Are there any advantages to this misunderstanding?
The Supreme Court of the United States did not hear cases involving the First Amendment and freedom of expression until over 100 years after the First Amendment was ratified.
The given statement "The Supreme Court of the United States did not hear cases involving the First Amendment and freedom of expression until over 100 years after the First Amendment was ratified" is true.
The Supreme Court has ruled that speakers are protected from all governmental entities and officials, including federal, state, and local officials as well as legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The First Amendment refers to "Congress," and the court has interpreted this to mean all branches of government. However, speakers are not protected by the First Amendment from private parties like private employers, private colleges, or private landowners. Only the government is constrained by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has broadened the definitions of "speech" and "press" to include expression through broadcasting, the internet, and other media in addition to talking, writing, and printing. The supreme court therefore did not hear cases involving the First Amendment and freedom of expression until over 100 years after the First Amendment was ratified.
Know more about "Supreme Court" visit
brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
federalist 39 if the plan of the convention, therefore, be found to depart from the republican character, its advocates must abandon it as no longer defensible
In Federalist 39, Alexander Hamilton argues that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government.
What does Federalist 39 say ?Hamilton acknowledges that the Constitution does not create a pure democracy, in which all laws are made directly by the people. However, he argues that this is not necessary for a government to be considered a republic. He points out that even in a pure democracy, the people must delegate some of their power to representatives.
Hamilton concludes that the proposed Constitution is a republican form of government and that its advocates should not abandon it simply because it is not a pure democracy. He defines a republic as "a government in which the scheme of representation takes place."
Find out more on the Federalist papers at https://brainly.com/question/233891
#SPJ4