Answers
Explanation, the blue car had the right of way while the orange car didn’t yield to the vehicle that was already in the roundabout.
Related Questions
Is Carry a firearm a civil right or civil liberty
Answers
True or False: A person who has been accused of a crime can refuse to appear in court.
Answers
What does discoverable mean in court?
Answers
Information or evidence that can be gained through the discovery process is referred to as discoverable in courts.
In a legal setting, information or evidence that can be gained through the discovery process is referred to as being "discoverable." The pre-trial stage of a case known as discovery gives both sides the chance to ask for and collect information and supporting documentation from the opposing side. Documents, witnesses, and other items pertinent to the case may be included in this information.
In a court, If information or evidence is pertinent to the lawsuit's claims or defences and is not shielded by the attorney-client privilege or another legal exception, it is deemed discoverable. Parties may utilise a variety of instruments throughout the discovery process, including interrogatories, demands for the production of documents, and depositions, to gather information from the opposing party.
Read more about court on:
https://brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
Which of the following is the lowest court in the tiered structure of the state court systems in nearly every state: Trial Court
Answers
Is lowest court in the tiered structure of the state court system in nearly every state.
If you take a picture of something and post it to like the world do you think someone could investigate and pull up your IP address? (dude answer me this my brothers are arguing with me because they think that someone cannot do that and i just want to prove to them that you can)
Answers
Answer:
they can
Explanation:
it's called hacking
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answers
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation:
The First Amendment allows freedom of assembly.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The first amendment allows not only the freedom of assembly but also the freedom of speech, religion, the press, and the right to protest.
Under the USA PATRIOT Act, insurers are required to report receipt of cash payments in excess of
a) $5,000
b) $10,000
c) $15,000
d) $20,000
Answers
Under the USA PATRIOT Act, insurers are required to report receipt of cash payments in excess of $10,000, option B. This requirement is part of the effort to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.
The USA PATRIOT Act is a landmark Act of the United States Congress, signed into law by President George.W.Bush. It is an acronym for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" (USA PATRIOT).
According to this, insurers must follow the regulations set by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and must file a Currency Transaction Report (CTR) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the United States Treasury Department within 15 days of receiving such a payment.
The Currency Transaction Report (CTR) must include the customer's name, address, social security number or taxpayer identification number, and a description of the transaction. Failure to comply with this requirement can result in significant penalties and fines for insurers.
This promotes transparency, enables authorities to track suspicious transactions, and helps maintain the integrity of the financial system. By reporting these transactions, insurers play a crucial role in upholding national security and combating financial crime.
Learn more about Money laundering here: brainly.com/question/29830487.
#SPJ11
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
Answers
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
The defendant, Union Pacific RR (UPRR), was sued, under the authority of the Federal Employees Labor Act (FELA), by one of its own employees who was afflicted by West Nile virus after being bitten by a mosquito while on the job. After coming down with the virus, William Nami, the plaintiff, could not walk without a cane, could not drive, and had experienced memory loss. He argued that he was bitten by an infected mosquito while working for UPRR outside Galveston, Texas, and next to an area on UPRR’s right of way, that was infested by the virus-carrying mosquitoes. He noted that the infestation had been exacerbated by UPRR’s negligence in never mowing the grass and allowing the standing water to accumulate. Nami also argued that UPRR did not warn employees about the mosquitoes, did not provide insect repellent, and did not equip employees with long-sleeved shirts. UPRR replied that under the doctrine of ferae naturae, the company was not liable for Nami’s illness because he was injured by a wild animal that was not in UPRR’s possession. UPRR also claimed that because the danger was commonly understood to exist (Galveston is known by local inhabitants as the "mosquito capital of the world"), the company had neither a duty to warn nor a duty to supply employees with repellent or long-sleeved shirts. UPRR also disputed the claim that it did not mow the grass and that it let the standing water accumulate. Nami argued that UPRR was relying on common law principles, like ferae naturae and proximate cause, that had been deliberately superseded by FELA, which states that a railroad will be liable for on-the-job injuries to a worker if the railroad "caused or contributed to" a worker’s injury just so long as the railroad’s "negligence played a part—no matter how small—in bringing about the injury." The trial court held for the railroad, but the court of appeals reversed. The case then went to the Texas Supreme Court. Does FELA supersede the Roman law principle of ferae naturae, and if not, does the doctrine of ferae naturae protect UPRR from liability? Explain. [See: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Nami, 498 S.W. 3d 890 (Texas 2016).]
Answers
We found that the idea still holds true in the contemporary environment and that the catastrophe was not the fault of the Railways.
A railway worker who was bitten by a mosquito and later found to have West Nile virus is suing his employer for damages under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (often known as "FELA," which mandates railway companies to provide their workers with a sufficiently safe place of working).
The majority of the time, FELA culpability is determined in accordance with the norms of common law negligence. The well-established "ferret hypothesis" of the nature doctrine releases landowners from responsibility for damage caused by wild animals that wander into their property without human action.
Learn more about Liability Act here
https://brainly.com/question/31190764
#SPJ4
a world health organization document that attempts to restrict advertising of cigarettes is ignored by tobacco companies in the united states. this is an example of which of the following principles of u.s. health law? group of answer choices a provision of international law does not apply in the united states unless united states law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the united states congress. the interstate commerce clause of the united states constitution has been used as a basis for justifying federal action in the area of health. police powers allow states to pass legislation and take actions to protect the common good.
Answers
A) A provision of International law does not apply in the United States unless United States law incorporates the provision such as ratification of a treaty by the United States Congress.
Historically, the prevention and control of communicable diseases had been done by way of sanitation, safe water, meal supply, isolation, and immunization.
EBPH is the improvement, implementation, and assessment of powerful packages and guidelines in public fitness via the application of standards of clinical reasoning, such as systematic makes use of statistics and information structures and appropriate use of software making plans fashions.
Learn more about ratification here https://brainly.com/question/7458577
#SPJ4
a court can exercise jurisdiction over property located that is located within its boundaries.
T/F
Answers
True. A court can exercise jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries. This concept is known as "in rem jurisdiction," which allows a court to make decisions regarding property within its territorial limits, even if the property owner is not physically present in the jurisdiction.
Yes, a court can exercise jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries. This is known as in rem jurisdiction, where the court has authority over the property itself rather than the people involved in the case. In some cases, a court may also have in personam jurisdiction, which means authority over the individuals involved in the case. However, in rem jurisdiction is particularly relevant in cases involving property disputes or when a person is seeking to claim ownership of a piece of property.
Learn more about rem jurisdiction: https://brainly.com/question/30490907
#SPJ11
The senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of
Answers
Answer:
checks and balances.
Explanation:
Checks and balances refers to a system that is typically used in a democratic society to enforce a balance of power between the three (3) arms of government; executive, judiciary and legislative arm. These checks and balances are really important and necessary so as to ensure there wouldn't be an abuse of power by any of arm of government.
Hence, the senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of checks and balances.
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the
Answers
Answer:
The second option, The Exclusionary Rule
Explanation:
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the exclusionary rule.
What is Exclusionary rule?The exclusionary rule bars the government from using the majority of evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio demonstrated that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment through an unreasonable search or seizure.
The exclusionary rule forbids the admission of evidence obtained illegally through a search and seizure. One of the primary goals of the exclusionary rule is to discourage law enforcement from conducting searches and seizures that violate the Fourth Amendment.
Death penalty supporters also claim that it deters qualifying criminal activity.
Therefore, based on the exclusionary rule evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court.
To learn more about the Exclusionary rule refer to:
brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ7
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was,
Evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court based on the inclusionary rule exclusionary rule self-incrimation rule warrant rule
Trace the evolution of the legal status of American unions. What activities were restricted by laws and courts? Did constraints increase or decline with time?
Answers
Labor unions have a long history that dates to the late 1700s. Workers were rarely able to improve their pay or working conditions without strong leadership. But as capable leaders started to appear, labor grew into a force that pressed for acceptance by industry and the government. The labor movement underwent gradual change, but thanks to the efforts of some progressive union leaders, significant progress was eventually made.
Early organized labor was frequently suppressed by legislation and judicial rulings and received no support from the government. According to the "conspiracy doctrine" of the late 1700s, the majority of collective activities are unlawful because they go against the interests of the general public. In the early 1800s, organized trade and industry labor had little success in securing better pay and working conditions, as noted by Fossum (2012), but courts continued to obstruct the majority of collective endeavors.Thus this is the evolution of the legal status of American Unions.
To learn more about American Unions, refer: https://brainly.com/question/2025366
#SPJ9
Labor unions have a long history that dates to the late 1700s. Workers were rarely able to improve their pay or working conditions without strong leadership. But as capable leaders started to appear, labor grew into a force that pressed for acceptance by industry and the government. The labor movement underwent a gradual change, but thanks to the efforts of some progressive union leaders, significant progress was eventually made.
Early organized labor was frequently suppressed by legislation and judicial rulings and received no support from the government. According to the "conspiracy doctrine" of the late 1700s, the majority of collective activities are unlawful because they go against the interests of the general public.
In the early 1800s, organized trade and industry labor had little success in securing better pay and working conditions, as noted by Fossum (2012), but courts continued to obstruct the majority of collective endeavors.
Thus this is the evolution of the legal status of American Unions.
To learn more about American Unions, refer: brainly.com/question/2025366
#SPJ9
Answer Key
All answers will be graded following this answer key:
3 marks for the answer structure (Introduction, Body, Conclusion)
3 marks for presenting the legal concept (in this case the concept of offer, acceptance, and consideration)
4 marks for justifying or defending the decision
Tahir filed a civil case in court of first instance at RAK. His dispute with Khalid is worth AED 700,000. You are a judge to the case. Give your judgment and explain the decision.
Answers
It would be desirable to get the advice of a qualified legal expert or judge who is knowledgeable with the rules and regulations relevant to the particular jurisdiction in issue for a matter involving a disagreement between Tahir and Khalid over AED 700,000 in the court of first instance at RAK. To reach a well-informed decision, they would be able to evaluate the relevant facts, arguments, evidence, and legislation. A fair and unbiased assessment of the relevant facts and legal principles is crucial since legal issues include many factors.
The legal word for the power given to a legal organization to carry out justice is jurisdiction . In federations like the United States, there are local, state, and federal levels of jurisdiction.
In order to allocate resources to best meet the requirements of society, the executive and legislative branches of government legislation have the authority to use international law, conflict of laws, constitutional law, and other legal frameworks.
Learn more about jurisdiction , from :
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ1
Which of these is NOT a reason why a dirt or gravel road can be
dangerous?
A. Your tires are more likely to be punctured
B. There can be gravel or dust kicked back onto your windshield
C. It means you are off the GPS network which is dangerous
D. It’s most likely for your vehicle to lose traction
Answers
Answer:
B. There can be gravel or dust kicked back onto your windshield
Explanation:
Losing the track of a GPS network is not a dangerous for driving on a gravel road or dirt.
What is a gravel road?Gravel road is a road, the upper surface of which is covered with gravel and small crushed stones. There is risk of tires getting punctured, or vehicle to lose traction while driving on such roads.
Hence, option C holds true regarding a gravel road.
Learn more about a gravel road here:
https://brainly.com/question/5215737
#SPJ2
best way to write a letter for Long-Term disability appeal
Answers
The best way to write a letter for long-term disability is to emphasize claims of disability and attaching medical records acting as evidence.
What is a long-term disability appeal?Long-term disability insurance is a form of coverage that pays out if an employee is unable to work for an extended length of time due to an accident, illness, or injury. This sort of insurance pays the employee a percentage of their salary while they are out of the office.
While writing a disability claim it is important to mention all the facts related to a medical condition and why the insurance company denied the fact. It should include all the documents proving your claim for the disability.
Learn more about long-term disability appeal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27571970
#SPJ1
DRIVERS ED!!!
What is an Uber area?
A. Cities and towns
B. Farms and crops
C. Countryside
D. Mountain peaks
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Answer:A
Look on the Uber up lol r you going to try to Uber to the top of a mountain no
Eton files a suit in a federal district court against Florida, alleging employment discrimina¬tion under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. The state asks the court to dismiss the suit. The court is most likely to rule that
a. the state is immune from the suit.
b. the suit can proceed.
c. Eton is immune from any defense the state might offer.
d. the court is immune from such request.
Answers
The state requests that the court dismiss the lawsuit. The state will probably be declared immune from the lawsuit by the court.
How is litigation funding referred to?A lawsuit is an action brought by one or more parties in a civil court of law against one or more other parties. Only a few laws from long ago that are still in force today include the phrase "suit in law." A dispute between individuals or groups that is taken to court for resolution: bring/file/threaten to sue SB Two ladies filed a lawsuit for sexual harassment against their former employer. A litigation should be dropped, settled, or dismissed. Legal actions that are resolved in court entail the plaintiff suing the defendant for damages.The financial compensation granted to a plaintiff in a court case is known as compensatory damages. In civil court situations, this kind of compensation is given.To learn more about lawsuit, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/1065754
What Does the USCIS Case Status ""Case Transferred"" Mean for My Marriage Green Card Application?
Answers
The USCIS case status "case transferred" would basically mean that your case for the marriage green card application will now be handles by some other service center.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services or the USCIS case status “Case Was Transferred And A New Office Has Jurisdiction” would basically mean that the USCIS has moved your respective case to another field office or a different service center. The new office will then continue the processing your case from there.
USCIS may be transferring the particular marriage green card case for a number of reasons which might include the processing delays or the staffing shortages. Cases might also get transferred if the person happens to move and is now present in a new jurisdiction.
To know more about USCIS
https://brainly.com/question/30095119
#SPJ4
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Answers
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey found that there was a surplus of practicing physicians in the U. S. In the 1960’s. True or False
Question 2
According to the principal-agent problem;
A) Patients chose to be rationally ignorant
B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor
C) Both 1 and 2
D) Health maintenance organizations do not insure people for their pre-existing conditions
Question 3
The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is;
A) GDP per capita
B) Population size
C) Medical Insurance System
D) Availability of physicians
Answers
1. True. 2. B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. 3. The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System.
1. In the 1960s, there was indeed a surplus of practicing physicians in the United States. The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey conducted during that time period found evidence of an oversupply of physicians relative to the demand for their services. This surplus was attributed to various factors, including the rapid growth of medical schools, changes in healthcare financing, and increased government support for medical education. As a result, the number of physicians entering the workforce exceeded the demand, leading to a surplus.
2. The principal-agent problem refers to a situation in which an agent (in this case, the doctor) is entrusted by a principal (the patient) to make decisions on their behalf. The correct statement regarding the principal-agent problem is B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. In this context, patients often rely on doctors' expertise and knowledge to make informed decisions about their healthcare. However, this delegation of decision-making can sometimes lead to issues of information asymmetry, where the doctor may prioritize their own interests or have different goals than the patient. The principal-agent problem recognizes this potential conflict of interest and the need for mechanisms to align the doctor's actions with the patient's best interests.
3. Among the given options, the strongest predictor of the variation in healthcare demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System. The type and structure of a country's healthcare insurance system can significantly influence healthcare demand. Countries with comprehensive and accessible healthcare insurance systems tend to have higher demand for healthcare services due to increased affordability and availability of care. On the other hand, countries with limited or fragmented insurance systems may experience lower demand for healthcare services. While factors such as GDP per capita, population size, and availability of physicians can also contribute to healthcare demand variation, the medical insurance system has been found to be a key determinant.
It is important to note that these answers are based on general knowledge and may not encompass all possible perspectives or nuances related to the topics.
To learn more about delegates click here: brainly.com/question/30112239
#SPJ11
Explain why current is not used up in a circuit.
Hi!
Can you help me on this question with a simple answe r please?
If answer is correct I'll give 5 stars, a thanks, some points and brainliest
Answers
Current is not used up in a circuit because it is a flow of electric charge that moves continuously through the circuit, maintaining a constant rate of flow unless the circuit is interrupted.
Why is current is not used up in a circuit?Electric current is the movement of charged particles, usually electrons, through a conductive material such as a wire or circuit board. In a closed circuit, the current flows continuously from the source (such as a battery or power supply) through the circuit components (such as resistors, capacitors, and diodes) and back to the source.
As the current flows, it encounters resistance from the components in the circuit, which can cause it to decrease in voltage or energy. However, the current itself does not disappear or "get used up" in the process. Instead, it maintains a constant rate of flow, driven by the potential difference or voltage across the circuit.
Read more about current
brainly.com/question/24858512
#SPJ1
Driver should monitor their levels of what
Answers
Laws that enforce segregation and deny african americans legal equality are called.
Answers
Answer: the correct answer is The Jim Crow Laws
Explanation:
The Jim Crow Laws were enacted after the Civil War by the Southern States to impose racial segregation and discrimination against black people.
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
Answers
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
prenatal care often includes which of the following components? multiple select question. comprehensive educational services employment services nutritional services social services
Answers
Prenatal care includes a)comprehensive educational services, b) employement services,d)social services.So,correct options are a,b,d.
Prenatal care, otherwise called antenatal consideration, is a sort of preventive medical services. It is given as clinical exams, comprising of suggestions on dealing with a sound way of life and the arrangement of clinical data like maternal physiological changes in pregnancy, natural changes, and pre-birth nourishment including pre-birth nutrients, which forestalls potential medical conditions over the span of the pregnancy and advances the mother and youngster's wellbeing alike.[1][2]The accessibility of routine pre-birth care, including pre-birth screening and conclusion, has had an impact in decreasing the recurrence of maternal demise, unsuccessful labors, birth surrenders, low birth weight, neonatal contaminations and other preventable medical issues.
Prenatal care has four components :
(1) the underlying admission history and actual assessment,
(2) intermittent screening or symptomatic testing,
(3) sequential assessments watching patterns of different objective estimations and patient's close to home change in accordance with pregnancy, and
(4) patient schooling.
Hence,options a,b and d are correct.
To know more about prenatal care,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/30092987
#SPJ4
(Complete question) is:
prenatal care often includes which of the following components? multiple select question.
a)comprehensive educational services
b)employment services
c)nutritional services
d)social services
exculpatory clause people may put in a clause/provision that purports to relieve the defendant of a duty of care he would otherwise owe to the plaintiff. What is this provision called.
Answers
The provision that purports to relieve the defendant of a duty of care that they would otherwise owe to the plaintiff is called an exculpatory clause or release.
It is a contractual provision that attempts to shift the risk of harm from the party responsible for causing it to the injured party.
Exculpatory clauses are often used in situations where there is a potential for injury or harm, such as in recreational activities like skydiving or bungee jumping, or in sports like skiing or snowboarding. By signing a contract or agreement that includes an exculpatory clause, the plaintiff agrees to assume the risks associated with the activity and waives their right to sue the defendant for any injuries sustained.
However, exculpatory clauses are not always enforceable. Courts will typically look at several factors when determining whether an exculpatory clause is valid, including the clarity of the language used, the nature of the activity involved, and the relative bargaining power between the parties.
In some states, such as California, exculpatory clauses are prohibited by law in certain circumstances, such as in agreements involving personal injury or wrongful death claims. In other states, courts will closely scrutinize exculpatory clauses and may refuse to enforce them if they are deemed to be against public policy or unconscionable.
Overall, exculpatory clauses can be a useful tool for parties to manage their risks and allocate responsibilities, but they must be carefully drafted and reviewed to ensure that they are enforceable and do not violate any applicable laws or public policies.
learn more about exculpatory clause here
https://brainly.com/question/27222495
#SPJ11
The purpose of scanning the crime scene by the C.S.I. after it has
been secured is not to...
Determine what personal protective equipment should be used
Determine what level of investigation should be conducted
Prepare preliminary documentation such as notes rough sketches or
photographs
Locate and apprehend the suspect
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
To must walk thoroughly through the scene to get an idea of how the crime was committed, and if there is any entry/exit wounds on people or objects. The purpose of the walk through is to determine what needs to be more closely examined and what evidence may be present