Anarchy, Authoritarian, and totalitarianism correctly arrange systems of government in order from least powerful to most powerful. Thus option D is correct.
What is government?The group of people who make up a municipal unit's or an institution's regulatory agency. An organized population is governed by a system or group of individuals, typically a state. The government often consists of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the situation of its broad integrative definition.
Anarchy is a condition of disarray brought on by a lack of respect for or disregard for authority or other governing mechanisms.
Authoritarianism is supporting or imposing slavish submission to authority, particularly that of the government, somewhere at expense of human freedom.
Totalitarianism is a kind of government that demands total submission to authority and is autocratic and centralized.
Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about the government, Here:
brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ5
Which of the following identifies how the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the women's rights movement influenced the trends shown in
the line graph?
A. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of state governments.
B. Affirmative action policies applied equal pay laws to employees of the federal govemment.
C. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy
D. Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in traditionally male-dominated fields
Answer:
maybe i think option c Affirmative action policies increased women's employment in all sectors of the economy.
__________ is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.
Hearsay is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.
Hearsay refers to an out-of-court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Generally, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court because it is considered unreliable and lacks the safeguards that come with live testimony and cross-examination.
One reason why hearsay is impermissible is that it deprives the opposing party of the opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the original statement. Cross-examination is a critical part of the legal process as it allows the opposing counsel to challenge the credibility and reliability of the witness's testimony. When hearsay evidence is presented, however, the opposing counsel cannot question the original speaker about the circumstances under which the statement was made or any other relevant information that may impact its reliability.
There are some exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as when the statement falls under a recognized hearsay exception or when it is used for a non-hearsay purpose, but generally speaking, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court.
learn more about Hearsay here
https://brainly.com/question/31668354
#SPJ11
2. Drivers have a critical role to play in ensuring safety on the road. Which of the following is
not a safe practice for drivers?
a. Carrying out regular maintenance on the vehicle
b. Avoiding distractions while driving
c. Avoid driving while impaired by fatigue, alcohol or drugs
d. Avoid driving during bad weather
e. Running red lights at intersections
Answer:
Option e is not a safe practice for drivers
Explanation:
legally enforced segregation in public schools is a form of
Legally enforced segregation in public schools is a form of de jure discrimination.
The legal separation of individuals or groups is known as de jure segregation. "De jure" (Latin for "according to the law") literally means "according to the law." De jure segregation may be seen in the Jim Crow Laws of the American South from the late 1800s to the 1960s and the South African Apartheid laws that divided Blacks and Whites from 1948 to 1990. De jure segregation has existed—and continues to exist—in other domains, such as gender and age, despite often being linked with race.
The ruling was based on the crucial constitutional distinction between "de jure" segregation, which results from intentional discrimination on the part of the government, and "de facto" racial imbalance, which results from inadvertent or "fortunate" acts by the government and private organizations.
Learn more about de jure segregation here:
https://brainly.com/question/17700543
#SPJ4
What is the purpose of the Federal Communications Commission? (Site 1)
Which power is given to the United States through the powers given to Congress in Article I sec. 8
A. Build Roads
B. Creating Better Schools
C. Providing Homes for the Poor and Homeless
D. Supervising Jails and Law Enforcement.
A. Build Roads
Through the powers given to Congress in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution, the power to build roads is granted to the United States. This authority allows Congress to oversee and regulate the construction and maintenance of highways, bridges, and other transportation infrastructure across the country. By having the power to build roads, Congress plays a crucial role in promoting transportation and ensuring the efficient movement of people, goods, and services throughout the nation. This power contributes to the development of a robust and interconnected transportation network that supports economic growth and facilitates the mobility of individuals and businesses.
Learn more about U.S Congress here:
brainly.com/question/21511287
#SPJ11
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
civilian employees are helpful in minimizing costs for police departments and can be used in all of the following capacities except:
Civilian employees are helpful in minimizing costs for police departments and can be used in all of the following capacities. Directly engaging in law enforcement activities, such as making arrests or conducting investigations.
Civilian employees can support police departments in various roles, such as administrative tasks, dispatching, and crime analysis, but they are not trained or authorized to perform direct law enforcement duties. Civilian employees may provide support services to criminal investigations, such as data analysis, evidence processing, or administrative tasks, the primary responsibility for conducting investigations is typically held by sworn officers with investigative training and authority. It's important to note that the specific roles and responsibilities of civilian employees may vary between police departments, and there may be some exceptions based on the department's organizational structure and needs.
You can learn more about Civilian at: https://brainly.com/question/2497247
#SPJ11
a) Los niños
Y у
las ninas no raconan.
¿Que efectos tiene esta idea en los
niños y las niñois ?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Los efectos que tiene esta idea en los niños y las niñas es la siguiente.
Se dice que los niños y las niñas no razonan. Y lo que sucede es que en esta etapa de la infancia el niño se desenvuelve por sus impulsos e imita lo que ve en los adultos.
Los expertos sociólogos comentan que hasta los 9 o 10 años de edad, los infantes no son capaces de razonar lo que hacen, y sólo se dejan llevar por sus impulsos. Por ello, no pueden sopesar las consecuencias de sus actos. Por esos son niños.
A esa edad, les gusta correr, jugar, no distinguen entre sus acciones y se limitan a observar y repetir conductas que observan de sus padres en casa. Como dicen los expertos. A esa edad, los niños son como unas "esponjas y lo absorben todo." Por eso hay que tener cuidado con lo que se les enseña.
what is the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine?
According to the doctrine of the toxic trees, evidence generated from illegally obtained evidence is not admissible in court, thus expanding the exclusionary rule.
What is a doctrine?As the core of teachings in a particular field of study or belief system, doctrine is a codification of beliefs or a body of teachings or instructions, taught concepts or positions.
"Catechism" is the etymologically equivalent Greek word. A body of theological doctrines as established by a church is frequently expressly suggested by the word doctrine.
In the common-law traditions, doctrine can also refer to a legal theory that has been formed through a lineage of earlier judgements. According to sociologist Mervin Verbit, one of the essential elements of religion is doctrine.
Content, frequency, intensity, and centrality are the four categories he uses to categorize doctrine. Within a given religious tradition, each of these may differ from one religion to the next.
Learn more about doctrine, here
https://brainly.com/question/30613074
#SPJ1
how does positivism relate to domestic violence
An economic system in which the government owns the primary means of production is called
direct democracy
autocracy
socialism
constitutional monarchy
True/False: Constitutional law includes only the U.S. Constitution.
Constitutional law includes only the U.S. Constitution. False.
While it does include the U.S. Constitution in the context of the United States, constitutional law is not limited to a single constitution. Many countries have their own constitutions, and constitutional law encompasses the principles, doctrines, and legal frameworks surrounding those constitutions.
Each country's constitutional law governs issues such as the structure of government, the separation of powers, individual rights and freedoms, the relationship between the state and its citizens, and the judicial review of laws for constitutionality.
Learn more about U.S. Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/14453917
#SPJ11
1. Explain your answers to the following questions:
• Why is public order necessary?
2. Does society have enough public order or too little?
2. A study of plaque buildup on teeth used three randomly
assigned groups of people who brushed their teeth
twice a day for a year. People in Group 1 used the same
toothbrush all year. People in Group 2 used the same
toothbrush all year but sterilized it each month. People
in Group 3 used a new, sterile toothbrush each month.
At the end of the year, people in Groups 1 and 2 had
the same amount of plaque buildup as each other, while
people in Group 3 had less plaque buildup.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain
the relative amounts of plaque buildup found in the three groups
5. True or false? Bills can start in either chamber of Congress.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Bills always start in the house and must be passed in the house to continue into the senate.
What is an example of contractionary economic policy?
A) Lowering the interest rate at which banks borrow money
B) Increases to the corporate tax rate
C) Executive orders that reduce regulations on businesses
D) Spending programs aimed at repairing infrastructure
Answer: B
Explanation: Increases to the corporate tax rate
TOPIC
You are assigned to a walking beat downtown, and every
morning you stop into a breakfast shop and have a cup of
coffee only. The owner does not charge you. After some
citizen complaints about the parking situation in the area,
the station has directed you to ticket all illegally parked
cars. As you are tagging the cars in front of the breakfast
shop, the owner comes out furious and asks what are you
doing? He states rather loudly, "I give you free coffee every
day and this is how you repay me"?
• How would you respond?
•
• Was there an implied consent that the free coffee
would be reimbursed by granting favors to the owner?
On a larger scale, could this lead to a perception of
corruption of the officer looked the other way or
warned customers that if they were parked illegally
and didn't move their cars they would be ticketed?
• What would be a solution to this issue?
In this case, I would respond by saying that giving free breakfast can be considered as a generous effort by the shop owner but it can never mean an implied consent for grant of favors.
Moreover, this could very well be perceived as corruption by the officers as they leave people without tickets despite illegally parking the vehicles and the grant of favors like the shop owner would also amount to bribery and corruption.
A viable solution to issue would be to make a rule to post proper advertisements about the penalty for illegal parking should be done. These advertisements would act as awareness as well as warning for people and then officers don't need to be lenient on people who still break the rules. This way, the issue of corruption allegations and illegal parking both can be resolved together.
To know more about Corruption:
brainly.com/question/15270178
#SPJ1
If the purpose of a tax cut is to increase consumption in spending, we often see tax cuts for the _ in times of economic hardship
If the purpose of a tax cut is to increase consumption and spending, then we often see tax cuts for the middle and lower-income earners in times of economic hardship.
This is because these groups tend to have a higher propensity to consume, meaning they are more likely to spend the additional disposable income resulting from the tax cut. By increasing consumption and spending, the hope is that it will stimulate economic growth and create jobs. Additionally, tax cuts for these groups can help alleviate some of the financial burden they may be experiencing during times of economic hardship. Overall, tax cuts for middle and lower-income earners can be a powerful tool in combating economic downturns.
For more such questions on lower-income, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29973180
#SPJ11
7
You are watching a movie about ancient Rome when a scene of a court case appears. You see that the court hearing is being held outside around
the town square or market. What can you reasonably infer about this case?
O A
O B.
OC.
O D.
The court case was about a minor offense.
The accused was a part of the elite class.
A corporeal punishment was about to be given.
The case involved a violent crime.
If the court hearing is being held outside around the town square or market then the court case was about a minor offense.
Roman legal procedure was a long-evolving system utilised in Roman courts that eventually served as the foundation for contemporary procedure in nations with civil law. There were three major, overlapping phases of development: the legis actiones, which lasted from the late 2nd century BCE until the end of the 5th century BCE law code known as the Twelve Tables; the formulary system; and the cognitio extraordinaria, which was in use during the post-Classical period. The legis actiones procedure was broken down into multiple phases.
To know more about Civil Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ1
9. When a person relies on an owner's oral promise to sell real property and then change is or her
position substantially, is the owner bound by the oral promise?
Answer:
Yes. Under the doctrine of equitable estoppel, when a person relies on an owner's oral promise to sell real property and then changes his or her position substantially, the owner is bound by the oral promise.
Before parliamentary acts were passed to regulate working, how many hours per day did most children work?.
Before the given parliamentary acts were passed in order to the regulate working, then children are not allowed to work for more than 12 hours in a day.
By 1833, any Government exceeded what become to be the primary of many acts handling running situations and hours. At first, there has been restricted energy to implement those acts however because the century advanced the guidelines have been enforced extra strictly.
Nonetheless, the hours and running situations have been nevertheless very difficult with the aid of using today’s standards, and no guidelines have been in region to defend person male workers. Working in the road jobs protected shining shoes, promoting newspapers, canning fish, making garments and weaving fabrics. With the understanding that youngsters labored in factories, mines, and different jobs we could speak approximately their wages and hours. A regular day for those abused youngsters become everywhere from 12 to 19 hours a day.
Learn more about parliamentary visit: brainly.com/question/1504316
#SPJ4
Advocate for or against allowing a cause of action for wrongful
birth (you can advocate either way, but you will learn more if you
defend the position you instinctively disagree
with).
Wrongful birth refers to a scenario whereby medical professionals do not adequately advise a parent about potential abnormalities in their unborn child during prenatal testing.
The parent may have decided against having the baby if they had known of the issues beforehand. Such parents can sue the healthcare provider for wrongful birth. There is no one right answer to whether a cause of action should be allowed in a wrongful birth. However, let's advocate against it.
It is not ethical to allow for wrongful birth lawsuits. Firstly, the responsibility of such lawsuits falls squarely on medical professionals. Medical professionals already carry an immense burden of dealing with human life. Doctors should not have to carry additional weight in cases where the issue was not caused by the medical personnel. As a result, wrongful birth cases may be detrimental to medical professionals' careers. Doctors may stop taking on high-risk cases to avoid potential litigation, resulting in the loss of innocent lives.Secondly, wrongful birth cases are a blatant disregard of human life. The child is a living and breathing individual that should not be subject to lawsuits. A child is a gift and a blessing regardless of their physical or mental condition. The laws surrounding wrongful birth should not devalue human life.Finally, wrongful birth lawsuits promote eugenics, which is a practice of selectively choosing traits in offspring. If wrongful birth lawsuits were to be allowed, it would lead to the promotion of aborting children with any perceived abnormality. It is ethically wrong to promote selective abortion based on perceived genetic defects.
In conclusion, wrongful birth lawsuits are not ethical. They promote selective abortions and disregard human life. Medical professionals are already under a great burden, and wrongful birth lawsuits would increase their workload and cause them unnecessary stress. A child's life is precious, and their physical or mental conditions do not determine their worth. Therefore, a cause of action for wrongful birth should not be allowed.
To know more about ethical visit:
brainly.com/question/30590798
#SPJ11
What can officers do to maintain effective communication during emergency situations
Answer:
Explanation:
In emergency situations like school shooting, bomb threats and other emergency situations, people will tend to panic. The officer would need to explain what is going and to calm the people down by keeping their explanation short. It can also save lives and reduce injury. Knowing the proper protective actions to take enables people to reduce their risks.
Which wernment agency created the economy Food Plan
Poverty: Select the best answer from the choices provided,
A The US Department of Agriculture
B The Department of Housing and Urban Development
C The Drug Enforcement Agency
D The Social Security Administration
Answer:
a
Explanation:
plato
I need help with this two question urgently, please help me and I will appreciate it but please don't copy and paste off the internet! Thank you so much in advanced, by the way this is a Criminology class.
Answer: Positivism- it's a philosophy of every justifiable assertion can be backed up by science and mathematical proof.
Rational theory- Refers to the theory of why humans behave as they might what causes certain behaviours.
Explanation:
Find a news about uncertainty law in Indonesia and add
a conclusion into it (Dont Plagarism pls)
The Positive Investment List of Indonesia permits foreign investment in more than 200 industries, including telecommunications, energy, and transportation. In certain industries, foreign investors may wholly own a company barring any restrictions.
The Investment Law and its related rules generally control foreign investment in Indonesia. According to the Investment Law, the Government must list the industries that are available to foreign investment, as well as the priority and any additional requirements.
As we shall see, the majority of Indonesian scholars reach the conclusion that their country is dualist, at least in terms of treaties, noting that many ratified international treaties are inactive and unenforceable until they are made into domestic law by statute or regulation.
To learn more about Indonesia, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31792781
#SPJ4
Uncertainty laws play a crucial role in legal systems worldwide, including Indonesia. These laws aim to provide clarity and predictability in legal matters, ensuring fairness and justice for individuals and businesses. The application of uncertainty laws helps establish a framework for interpreting ambiguous or conflicting legal provisions, addressing gaps in legislation, and guiding judicial decision-making.
In Indonesia, as in many countries, the legal system evolves to adapt to societal changes and new challenges. This necessitates the ongoing examination and refinement of uncertainty laws to keep pace with emerging legal issues and ensure the rule of law is upheld.
Balancing legal certainty with flexibility can be a complex task, as laws must strike a delicate balance between providing clear guidelines and allowing for judicial discretion.
To know more about law:
brainly.com/question/30133385
#SPJ4
Match the following offender complaints to the amendments that protect their rights.
Fifth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
First Amendment
Eighth Amendment
Answer:
Fifth Amendment
the officer who arrested me didn't read me my rights...
Fourth Amendment
While i was locked up my cell phone was stolen...
First Amendment
I was frequently prohibited from attending church services
Eighth Amendment
my cell was unsanitary
(Hope this helped let me know if i got any of them wrong)
Question 7 of 10
How does the exchange rate for a country's currency affect its terms of
trade?
A. Favorable terms of trade are required for a country to trade with
wealthy partners.
B. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to
deteriorating terms of trade.
O C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more
favorable terms of trade.
D. Deteriorating terms of trade prevent a country from using its
currency for trade.
Answer: C. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more favorable terms of trade.
Explanation:
Just got it right!
2.1. Name and explain the purpose of one law/legislation that protects citizens
against the specific gender based violence
Answer:
Uniform
Explanation:
Growing up, we have all been taught the stereotypical clothing each person should wear. E.G, a few weeks ago in my English class we were having a debate about how till this day, most girls choose to wear skirts, even if there is the option of trousers. I just think that this is something that has grown with us, and i guess people will still be judgemental in the future elsewhere.