Answer:
c
Explanation:
at the international court of justice, select one: a. states must take part in a process called fiat lux before the icj will accept the case. b. states may sue states. c. individuals may sue states. d. all decisions are binding on parties to a case.
At the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the correct statement is:
B. States may sue states.
The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and its primary function is to settle legal disputes between states. It is also known as the World Court, and it is located in The Hague, Netherlands. States can bring cases against other states at the ICJ, and the court has jurisdiction over disputes related to international law, including treaties and conventions.
Individuals or private entities cannot sue states directly at the ICJ. However, in some cases, states may bring cases on behalf of their citizens or legal entities, or individuals may be allowed to participate in a case as a third party with a legal interest.
All decisions made by the ICJ are binding on the parties to a case, meaning that the states involved in the dispute must comply with the court's judgment.
Learn more about the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
https://brainly.com/question/30185758
#SPJ11
What are the challenges for forensic scientists in identifying poisons?
Answer:
Taking samples to see what poisons were used and handling the samples
Parking is not allowed within feet of any flashing signal stop sign or trafic signal
Within 30 feet of any flashing signal, stop sign or traffic signal. In such a way that you block or create a hazard for other vehicles.
All of the following are true of the total institution EXCEPT:
a. One cannot leave
b. Others arrange every aspect of daily life
c. Regular communication with the community is encouraged
d. A schedule must be followed
Answer:
a. One cannot leave
Explanation:
A total institution is one in which the daily lives of the individuals inside it is highly regimented and controlled. This is done in-order to follow a strict code of lifestyles and to ensure strict compliance of the laid down rules and regulations guiding the institution.
All the statements above are true except the " One cannot leave" which happens to be false. In total institution, one is free to join them as well as being total free to leave the institution. Example is the boarding schools.
Identify and define two types of crimes.
Answer:
Theft and Arson.
Explanation:
Theft means stole
Arson= destruction
Answer:
Murder and Arson
Explanation:
Murder is you kill someone and Arson is you burn places.
Which of these first actions taken by jefferson does not reflect his belief in the need to reduce the power of the government?.
Jefferson did not believe that it was necessary to limit the scope of the government, as evidenced by his acquisition of the Louisiana Territory and other activities.
What is the boundaries of Louisiana?Between July 4, 1805, and June 4, 1812, when it was renamed the Missouri Territory, the Territory of Louisiana or Louisiana Territory was a formally incorporated territory of the United States.
What exactly was the Louisiana Purchase? The young republic's size was doubled by the Louisiana Purchase of 1803 when the United States acquired around 828,000 square miles of territory from France. From the Mississippi River in the east to the Rocky Mountains in the west and from the Gulf of Mexico in the south to the Canadian border in the north, there was a region at the time known as the Louisiana Territory. The land transaction ultimately resulted in the creation of some or all of 15 states and is regarded as one of Thomas Jefferson's presidency's most significant accomplishments.Jefferson did not believe that it was necessary to limit the scope of the government, as evidenced by his acquisition of the Louisiana Territory and other activities.
To know more about Louisiana Territory, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/856121
#SPJ4
which laws called for strict separation of the races in the south?
The laws that called for strict separation of the races in the South were known as Jim Crow laws.
Jim Crow laws were a series of state and local laws enacted in the Southern United States between the late 19th century and the mid-20th century. These laws enforced racial segregation and discrimination, particularly targeting African Americans. The term "Jim Crow" originated from a minstrel show character that portrayed racial stereotypes.
Under Jim Crow laws, various aspects of life, including education, housing, transportation, public facilities, and voting rights, were segregated based on race. These laws mandated separate facilities for white and black individuals, with African Americans often being subjected to inferior and discriminatory treatment. Schools, parks, restaurants, theaters, and other public spaces were segregated, with "separate but equal" being the legal doctrine allowing for racially segregated facilities.
Jim Crow laws were enforced through strict legal mechanisms, social customs, and violence or threats of violence by white supremacist groups. They were eventually challenged and struck down as unconstitutional through court cases and the Civil Rights Movement, leading to significant advancements in civil rights and the dismantling of legalized racial segregation.
It's important to note that while Jim Crow laws were primarily associated with the Southern United States, racial discrimination and segregation also existed in other regions of the country, although not always in the form of explicit Jim Crow laws.
To learn more about Jim Crow laws, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29884723
#SPJ11
How does the concept of privity of contract apply to this situation?
Answer:
sorry I need the points I got no answer
A _________________________ are minor offenses of the law. these can include jaywalking, lettering, or parking in a restricted zone. an infraction normally results in a ticket, which requires the person to pay a fine.
misdemeanor
infraction
felony
penal code
Answer:
Minor offense means any unlawful act that is a status offense or would be a misdemeanor, infraction, or violation of a municipal or county ordinance if the youth were an adult.
1. How can the principles of Ubuntu be applied in the criminal justice system to ensure justice for victims? (200 words, 5 marks)
The concepts of social justice embraced by Ubuntu include equity (encourages interdependence), fairness, and equality (promotes equal opportunities) (brings about equal sharing of resources such that all members survive).
How should the principles of Ubuntu be applied to the criminal justice system to assist victims in receiving justice?In Bantu, the word "Ubuntu" means "humanity" and is an African word. The full concept of "humanity for others" is expressed in this sentence. If a person has endured physical, mental, or emotional injury, they are regarded as a victim.
When a victim reports an incident, police take the proper action by acquiring all necessary data. Nonetheless, Ubuntu's guiding principles place more of an emphasis on what is ethically right than what is right. The general population ought to have more empathy for the victims and treat them with dignity.
Occasionally, a victim will kill a perpetrator. It is not appropriate for the investigating authorities to assume the victim was also the attacker in this situation. Investigating the scene of the crime and obtaining the murderer's testimony should be the police' top priorities. Prior to the investigation's conclusion, they shouldn't regard the person as either a victim or a criminal.
Compared to other philosophies, Ubuntu's approach to problem solving is slightly different. We should always have a big picture in Ubuntu. For instance, when a person travels, they might not always have a place to stay. The villagers may occasionally provide the things that the travelers need. The fact that the villagers give the travelers supplies is unimportant, but they nevertheless do it. This is due to their increased humanity and the assistance they give to others.
When a person poses a threat to large individuals, poisoning the subject is necessary. According to Ubuntu's guiding principles, a victim should be handled with compassion and ethics.
Learn more about Ubuntu's guiding principles: https://brainly.com/question/17259369
#SPJ9
the diffrense between self-confidence and self-esteem
Answer:
There is
Explanation:
Self confidence is the believe in oneself that the person can do what he/she believes they cannot do
Self esteem is the motivation of oneself to do something
Self esteem leads to Self confidence in the sense that if you do not motivate yourself you will not believe in yourself.
Stelissa was driving her 25-year-old rusty car through a rich neighborhood. Glenn, a police officer, pulled her over because he didn't like the looks of a junky car in a fancy area. Glenn demanded that she step out of the car for a pat-down search Glenn had no suspicion that Stelissa was committing a crime at the time of the stop. Glenn found a tiny bag of cocaine on Stelissa. Under these circumstances, this is Multiple Choice a an illegal search under the Fourth Amendment b an illegal search under Fifth Amendment c a legal search because ilegal drugs were found, justifying the police officer's actions d a legal search because police are given broad discretion to use their experience to fight crime and obviously the police officer was right in this case,
Glenn found a tiny bag of cocaine on Stelissa. Under these circumstances, this is an illegal search under the Fourth Amendment. The correct answer is A.
The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. In this scenario, there was no probable cause for the officer to conduct a search of Stelissa or her vehicle.
The officer's suspicion based solely on the appearance of Stelissa's car in a wealthy neighborhood does not provide sufficient justification for a search without a warrant or probable cause. Therefore, any evidence obtained from the illegal search would be inadmissible in court.
Learn more about illegal search under the Fourth Amendment at https://brainly.com/question/1290721
#SPJ11
Mac, a successful restaurateur from georgia, wanted to expand his business to memphis, tennessee. He was denied a business license from the regulatory authorities in memphis. The authorities told him that he was a nonresident and could not get a license to conduct business in tennessee. This denial is a blatant violation of the?.
This denial is a blatant violation of the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
The Constitution's Privileges and Immunities Clause stipulates that "the residents of each state shall have all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the various states."
This provision limits governmental attempts to discriminate against citizens from other states while defending the fundamental rights of individual citizens. However, only basic rights are covered by the Privileges and Immunities Clause, not all business activities.What is a Privileges and Immunities Clause example?
Life, liberty, and property are examples of privileges, as are the right to sue, the right to the protection of a federal marshal, the right to compete for federal office and the right to vote in federal elections.To Learn more about Privileges and Immunities Clause, Click the links.
https://brainly.com/question/2416141
#SPJ4
The due process clause of the United States Constitution is specifically
stated in which amendment?
Answer:
The 5th amendment
Explanation:
The fifth amendment of the U.S. constitution states that citizens are entitled to due process
Answer:
5th Amendment!
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLS HELP ME!!
Who goes first when presenting opening statements in a criminal trial?
A. Judge
B. Witness
C. Defense
D. Prosecution
Answer:prosecuting attorney
Explanation: The side bringing the case is the side that bears the burden of proof, and thus always goes first. This is the prosecuting attorney in a criminal case, or the plaintiff in a civil case. The defense then follows w
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
A massage professional wants to see whether the loca-
tion for an office being considered for rental is in an
appropriate business distinct. Where does one find this
information?
One can find information about the appropriateness of a location for a massage office by checking local zoning regulations and ordinances.
How can I determine if a specific location is suitable for a massage office?To determine whether a specific location is appropriate for a massage office, you can consider the following sources of information:
Zoning Regulations: Check the local zoning regulations and ordinances to understand if the area allows for massage businesses. Zoning laws often specify which areas are designated for commercial or mixed-use purposes.Municipal Planning Department: Contact the municipal planning department or the local government office responsible for land use and development. They can provide information on zoning restrictions, permits, and any specific regulations related to massage businesses in the area.Business Licensing Department: Inquire with the local business licensing department or the agency responsible for issuing permits for massage professionals. They can inform you about any requirements or restrictions in that particular location.Chamber of Commerce or Business Associations: Reach out to the local Chamber of Commerce or business associations in the area. They may have information about the types of businesses present in the vicinity and any regulations that could affect your decision.Online Databases: Some cities or regions provide online databases or maps that outline zoning areas and business districts. These resources can help you determine if the location you're considering falls within an appropriate business district.Professional Associations: Contact professional massage therapy associations or organizations that operate in the area. They might have knowledge about specific regulations or considerations for massage professionals in different parts of the city.Consultation with Professionals: Consider consulting with a local attorney or real estate agent who specializes in commercial properties. They can guide you through the process and help you understand any legal or regulatory aspects related to the location you're considering.Remember that the specific procedures and resources available can vary depending on your location. It's advisable to reach out to local authorities and professionals who are familiar with the regulations in the area you are interested in.
Learn more about specific location
brainly.com/question/31037818
#SPJ11
an agent can bind his principal on a contract or other matter only when the agent has the______________ to do so.
An agent can bind his principal on a contract or other matter only when the agent has the authority to do so.
Authority in this context refers to the power or right to act on behalf of someone else, which is given to the agent by the principal. The principal is the person or entity that authorizes the agent to act on their behalf, while the agent is the individual who performs the tasks assigned to them by the principal. Without the authority granted by the principal, the agent cannot enter into any binding agreements or make decisions on behalf of the principal. Thus, it is crucial for the principal to clearly define the scope of authority given to the agent and to ensure that the agent acts within the bounds of that authority. it can be concluded that the relationship between an agent and a principal is based on trust and mutual understanding. The principal relies on the agent to represent their interests, while the agent relies on the principal to provide them with the necessary resources and authority to perform their duties.
To know more about authority visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2302224
#SPJ11
Which of the following requires state governments to spend their own money to meet standards imposed on them by the federal government?
a. categorical grants
b. block grants
c. program grants
d. formula grants
e. unfunded mandates
A correct answer is an option (e), i.e., unfunded mandates. Unfunded mandates are federal requirements imposed on state and local governments without providing funding to cover the cost of complying with these requirements.
This means that state governments must spend their own resources to meet the standards imposed by the federal government without receiving financial assistance to do so. On the other hand, categorical, block, program, and formula grants are forms of federal financial assistance provided to state and local governments to help them carry out specific programs and activities.
These grants come with specific conditions and requirements, but they also provide funding to help states meet them. Unfunded mandates burden state and local budgets, while grants provide funding to support specific programs and activities.
To learn more about unfunded mandates, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/13038480
#SPJ4
is bryan responsible for the debts of his wife?
Answer:
yes i think so tbh
Explanation:
Answer:
No
Explanation:
a wrong that arises from a violation of a private duty is called a:
A wrong that arises from a violation of a private duty is called a tort. A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to someone and gives them the right to sue for damages.
Private duties can arise from various relationships, such as employer-employee, doctor-patient, or landlord-tenant. Examples of torts arising from a violation of private duties include negligence, breach of contract, and defamation. Negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care, and their actions or inaction cause harm to another person. Breach of contract occurs when one party fails to fulfill their obligations under a contract, causing harm to the other party. Defamation occurs when someone makes false and harmful statements about another person, causing damage to their reputation.
To learn more about violation, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19271039
#SPJ11
anh chị hãy phân tích chủ thể của quan hệ pháp luật trong trường hợp sau: Anh A (20 tuổi, mắc bệnh tâm thần). Có bán cho anh B (30 tuổi) 1 mảnh đất có giá trị 100 triệu đồng. Trong trường hợp này có chủ thể nào vi phạm pháp luật không? vì sao?
Answer:
ARAT PO ML HAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAH
Explanation:
BUHATIN KITA HAHAHAHAHAH
a trust is a legal arrangement in which the title to property is held for the benefit of a third party by ____
A trust is a fiduciary arrangement in which one party, known as the trustor, grants another, known as the trustee, the authority to hold title to real estate or other assets for the benefit of another.
A trust's beneficiaries are the person or people for whom it was established. Beneficiaries and a trustee are named by the trust's grantor, who has a duty under the trust agreement to manage trust funds in the beneficiaries' best interests.
In a trust, one or more trustees are entrusted with managing, safeguarding, and investing certain assets and any income they may create for the benefit of one or more identified beneficiaries.
Learn more about trustee Visit: brainly.com/question/30773280
#SPJ4
Who is most likely to follow public opinion polls to help them make decisions? Members of the House of Representative, Senators or the President? Why?
Answer:
The President is the one who is most likely to follow opinion polls when making government decisions, given that it is a one-man and clearly personalist position, which means that, in case of making decisions that are contrary to the majority opinions, it will impact decisively in its political image in the face of society. On the other hand, both the Senate and the House of Representatives are plural organisms, with which their members are less individualizable and, therefore, are less exposed to public opinion.
Answer:House of Representative members
Explanation:
Representatives run for election every two years and must constantly raise campaign money. They abide by public opinion because do not have time to explain their actions or mend fences before each election.
What is the purpose of the identification doctrine?
Answer:
The doctrine of identification was a principle used in old English law which stated that a person who gets injured while traveling due to another's negligence cannot claim damages if the driver of the conveyance is contributorily negligent.
Explanation:
i read about it
Write an essay that evaluates the reasoning of the supreme court majority opinion and dissent in the case of tinker v. Des moines. You must decide which argument is stronger and support your claim with evidence from the text itself. That evidence can take the form of quotes, facts, summaries, or anything else you can find in the tinker v. Des moines case. Besides making a claim and supporting it with evidence, you should also respond to a counterclaim. Who might disagree with your opinion and why? how might you provide a rebuttal to this person's argument?.
The majority of the Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision that neither students nor teachers "give up their guaranteed by the constitution rights to free speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." The Court ruled that school authorities could not restrict speech solely because they feared it would disrupt the teaching atmosphere.
The differing view contended that the First Amendment does not grant the ability to voice any view point at any time. Students go to school to learn, not to be taught. The armbands were a nuisance. School officials with a lawful interest in maintaining school order must have broad power to safeguard a productive learning atmosphere.
Students will be able to apply Tinker v. Des Moines precedent to a fictional, contemporary scenario. They will use civil debate skills to investigate the tensions among both students' interests in democracy and free speech on campus and the interests of their school in maintaining an arranged teaching atmosphere. They will be able to agree and reach concessions.
To know more about democracy click here
brainly.com/question/29680582
#SPJ4
Compared with Western Europe, the United States has a __________ turnout in elections.
a. higher
b. lower
c. roughly equivalent
d. non-comparable
Answer:
lower
Explanation:
Answer: The answer is B Lower
Explanation: Compared with Western Europe, the United States has a lower turnout in elections.
This disengagement between potential voters and the people running and the policies they are pushing is one of the reasons why the United States has a lower turnout in elections
Hope this was helpful
Decide whether each problem contains mitigating factors or aggravating factors.
1. The defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter.
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation.
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed.
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics.
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school.
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family.
Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.
What is the Mitigating and Aggravating factor?A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.
On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.
Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:
2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor
3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.
4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor
5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor
6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor
7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.
Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341
#SPJ1
No matter who does the investigation, citizen complaints are inherently difficult to sustain in favor of the____
No matter who does the investigation, citizen complaints are inherently difficult to sustain in favor of the complainant. Investigating citizen complaints is a complex task that requires thorough examination of the facts.
However, there are inherent challenges in sustaining these complaints. First, gathering sufficient evidence can be challenging, as incidents often occur without independent witnesses or conclusive proof. Second, establishing credibility can be difficult, as the complainant's account may be disputed by the accused or subject to subjective interpretations.
Lastly, biases and limitations within the investigative process, such as institutional biases or procedural constraints, can impede a fair and thorough examination of the complaint. These inherent difficulties in sustaining citizen complaints highlight the need for a robust investigative process that addresses these challenges.
To know more about complaint investigation, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/32295735
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
!! IT IS NOT D. FRONTAGE ROADS !!
2. Which of the following is NOT considered an appropriate removal location?
A. Mainlines
B. Medians
C. Shoulders
D. Frontage roads
Answer:
I think it should be a mainlines
Explanation:
because they're the mainlines...