Which are true of majorities and pluralities? Select all that apply.

A majority is a position held by more than half of a group.

A plurality is a position held by more than half of a group.

A majority is a position held by less than half of the group but is still the most popular decision

A plurality is held by less than half of the group but is still the most popular position.

Answer:

The Indian Relocation Act of 1956 (also known as Public Law 959 or the Adult Vocational Training Program) was a United States law intended to encourage Native Americans in the United States to leave Indian reservations, acquire vocational skills, and assimilate into the general population.

Explanation:

the time it takes for monetary and fiscal policies, designed to smooth out the economic cycle or respond to an adverse economic event, to affect the economy once they have been implemented.

Explanation:

Answer:

beacuse stood on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, addressed a crowd of an estimated 250,000 people and declared “I have a dream.” His speech called for an end to racial discrimination in the heat of the United States' civil rights movement, but it also carried a message of hope

Explanation:

Answer:

Because Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) thought it would be only a matter of time before the American system of government degenerated into an “elective despotism,” he warned that citizens should act now in order to make sure that “the wolf [was kept] out of the fold”

Explanation:

Answer:

A bill becomes law if signed by the President or if not signed within 10 days and Congress is in session

Explanation:

The bill is sent to the President for review. A bill becomes law if signed by the President or if not signed within 10 days and Congress is in session. If Congress adjourns before the 10 days and the President has not signed the bill then it does not become law ("Pocket Veto.").

The Compromise of 1850 contained the following provisions: (1) California was admitted to the Union as a free state; (2) the remainder of the Mexican cession was divided into the two territories of New Mexico and Utah and organized without mention of slavery; (3) the claim of Texas to a portion of New Mexico was ...

Answer:

Genghis Khan meaning universal ruler

Explanation:

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

B. Universal Ruler.

hope this helps please mark me the brainliest and peace and love

Answer:c is the answer

Explanation:

Answer:

General William Tecumseh Sherman

Explanation:

In November 1864, Union General William Tecumseh Sherman took his troops on a campaign through the South, in order to not only attack Confederate defenses, but to also disrupt the Confederate activity.

Absolute truth is NOT a feature of Postmodernism.

Postmodernism is a philosophical and cultural movement that emerged in the mid-20th century. It is characterized by a rejection of grand narratives and the idea that there is a single, objective truth that can explain everything. Instead, Postmodernism emphasizes the relativity of truth and the existence of multiple perspectives and interpretations.

Disillusionment is a feature of Postmodernism as it reflects a skepticism towards traditional ideologies and questioning of established beliefs and systems. The diversity of voices is another key aspect of Postmodernism, as it values the inclusion of marginalized and alternative perspectives, challenging the dominance of mainstream narratives. The increasing presence of media is also a characteristic of Postmodernism, as it acknowledges the influence and power of mass media in shaping culture and disseminating information.

However, the notion of absolute truth contradicts the core principles of Postmodernism. Postmodernists argue that truth is subjective and contextual, varying depending on individual experiences, cultural backgrounds, and social contexts. They critique the idea of a single, universal truth and instead emphasize the plurality and complexity of truth claims.

Know more about Postmodernism here:

https://brainly.com/question/17150741

#SPJ8

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution because they do not like the idea of stronger national government.

The Anti-Federalists are groups or advocates that opposed the idea of Federalism, that is, they want stronger state government over.

Hence, the Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution because they do not like the idea of stronger national government.

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about Anti-Federalists

brainly.com/question/267094

Answer: B

This is correct

Explanation:

In January 1893 Dole agreed to serve as the leader of the committee, acting for Hawaiian sugar interests and their American allies, that was formed to overthrow Queen Liliuokalani (who had succeeded her brother, Kalakaua, in 1891) and to seek annexation of Hawaii by the United States. Dole led the provisional government following the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii. He was also the President of the Republic of Hawaii and the Territorial Governor of Hawaii following its annexation. The Newlands Resolution formally annexed the Hawaiian Islands and created the Territory of the Hawaii in 1898.

Answer:

Zum Gali Gali" is a traditional Hebrew song relating to the formation of the State of Israel, originating sometime around its creation in 1948. The pioneers referred to in the song were the Jewish settlers who built the new Israel.

Explanation:

Zum Gali Gali" is a traditional Hebrew song relating to the formation of the State of Israel, originating sometime around its creation in 1948. The pioneers referred to in the song were the Jewish settlers who built the new Israel.

The correct answer is D) in the military.

During the war, African Americans received the best treatment in the military.

In a time when racial issues worried a big portion of the American citizens, another issue came into their minds: war.

African Americans found in the military a place where they were treated with more respect than in any other institution of the society in the United States.

African American people were drafted or volunteered, to defend their country with honor and courage. That is why military officials showed respect for black Americans because officials did not see the color of the skin, they saw a brave soldier fighting for the United States.

Bénouville is a commune in the Calvados department in the Normandy region in northwestern France. It is located on the Canal de Caen à la Mer close to Caen and Ouistreham.

Pegasus Bridge was designed by Bascule. It was opened in 1934. The successful capture of the bridges played an important role in limiting the effectiveness of a German counter-attack in the aftermath of the Normandy invasion. Later in 1944, the Benouville Bridge was renamed Pegasus Bridge in honour of the operation.

So we can conclude that: Bénouville is a commune in the Calvados department in the Normandy region in northwestern France. It is located on the Canal de Caen à la Mer close to Caen and Ouistreham.

Learn more about Pegasus Bridge here: https://brainly.com/question/5405101

#SPJ1

The Church was granted the power to elect and invest bishops, but the emperor could invest them with fiefs.

Answer:

D) widespread opposition made enforcement difficult.

Explanation:

The 18th Amendment was repealed in 1933 simply because of the unprecedented negative effect it had on the US public. The 18th Amendment, more commonly known as the start of the Prohibition Era, outlawed not only the sale, but also all steps in which to create alcohol. However, the popularity and high demand for alcohol (which was widely consumed throughout America), led to many obtaining unsafe alcohol through highly illegal means. Government-led initiatives against alcohol also failed to take into consideration that actual reasons for alcohol prohibition. In an effort to curb alcohol consumption, the government poisoned large amounts of alcohol. However, this led to large amounts of deaths, and did little to curb consumption. The initiative also led to giving more power to organized crimes, such as the Chicago Outfit, led by the infamous Al Capone. One thing also to note is the amount of federal agents who were bribed to turn a blind eye on many of the operations of these organized crimes, which led to a spike in criminal activities during these years. As such, because of the failures of the 18th Amendment, it was soon repealed, allowing for the purchase and consumption of alcohol to be legal again. Another governmental bonus that occurred from legalizing alcohol was the added benefit of being able to once again tax alcohol during it's processes. The government collected over $250 million in taxes per year following the repeal, which helped fund government programs throughout the Great Depression.

Learn more about the Prohibition Era, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13965778

Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. The complete question read;

The object in Image 1 best illustrates which of the following continuities in world history?

(A) The power of traditional elites was continuously challenged by the emerging power of new elites.

(B) The power of states was based on the ability of rulers to monopolize the use of violence.

(C) Artists depended on royal patronage for their livelihoods.

(D) Rulers used religious imagery to legitimize their political authority.

Answer:

(D) Rulers used religious imagery to legitimize their political authority.

Explanation:

We can make this assertion because the image seems to portray a blend between religious authority and political authority; because the caption seems to show that this religious object (the female ancestor spirit) was now used "FOR A KING’S CEREMONIAL SCEPTER".

In other words, the rulers now used religious imagery to legitimize their political authority, as if to say, they are been approved by their ancestors.

You can respond by saying: "I'm sorry to hear that your daughter has been sick. Is there anything I can do to help? or How is she feeling now? " or "I hope she gets better soon. Let me know if you need anything." This shows that you are concerned and willing to help, and it also allows the person to share more information about the situation if they choose to. Additionally, you can also express your empathy and concern for the person's well-being, and the well-being of their daughter. It also shows that you are listening and paying attention to what they are saying.

Answer:

McDonald v. Chicago

Explanation:

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment extends the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms to the states, at least for traditional, lawful purposes such as self-defense.

Facts

Four Chicago residents, including Otis McDonald, challenged a Chicago ordinance that required the registration of firearms while accepting no registrations that post-dated the implementation of a handgun ban in 1982. The law also required the re-registration of handguns with the payment of an annual fee and prevented any individual from registering a gun again once its registration had lapsed. McDonald, who was 76 years old and a former maintenance engineer, pointed out that his neighborhood in Morgan Park was prone to gang-related violence as a result of drug trafficking. He had been the victim of five burglaries, so he felt that he needed a handgun for the purposes of self-defense. (He owned shotguns for hunting but did not want to use those.)

Building on the Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), McDonald sought to expand the Second Amendment's application to state and local governments through selective incorporation. (Since Heller had unfolded in the District of Columbia, the Bill of Rights was directly applicable to this federally controlled area.) This meant that the right to bear arms must be deemed fundamental because of its deeply rooted presence in national history and traditions or its inherent role in protecting liberty. McDonald also offered the novel argument that the Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause should be allowed to apply the Bill of Rights to state and local governments, overturning the Court's 1873 decision in the Slaughter-House Case. This doctrinal shift would have allowed the Bill of Rights to be applied directly to non-federal governments without the need for incorporation. It could have had an impact on other parts of the Bill of Rights to which incorporation had not yet been applied.

Issues & Holdings

Issue: Whether the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires the application of the Bill of Rights in its entirety to state and local governments.

Holding: No. The holding in the Slaughter-House Case remains in effect, and incorporation is the appropriate way to selectively apply provisions in the Bill of Rights beyond the federal government.

Opinions

Majority

Samuel A. Alito, Jr. (Author)

John G. Roberts, Jr.

Antonin Scalia

Anthony M. Kennedy

Clarence Thomas

Declining to address the Privileges or Immunities Clause component of McDonald's argument, Alito applied the incorporation doctrine to find that state and local governments are subject to the Second Amendment through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He reminded readers that the right to bear arms is not unqualified and that the restrictions recognized in the Heller decision remain intact, such as bans on straw purchases, restrictions on use in school zone and federal buildings, and bans on use by convicted criminals or the mentally ill.

Concurrence

Clarence Thomas (Author)

Thomas would have accepted McDonald's bolder argument and overruled the Slaughter-House Case, finding that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment automatically applied all of the protections in the Bill of Rights to states and cities.

Concurrence

Antonin Scalia (Author)

Dissent

John Paul Stevens (Author)

Arguing against the principle of incorporation, Stevens would have reverted to the narrower 19th-century understanding of this doctrine.

Dissent

Stephen G. Breyer (Author)

These dissenters felt that there was no fundamental right to individual self-defense guaranteed by the Second Amendment. (Breyer had written a similar dissent in Heller.)

Case Commentary

Despite the holding that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments, this decision emphasizes that provisions of the Bill of Rights should be incorporated only if they are part of the national tradition or fundamental to historical visions of liberty. Whether this language will serve as a practical limit on incorporation is not certain.

As with Heller, the Court did not state the standard of review that was appropriate for Second Amendment cases. Like that earlier decision, it spawned a plethora of cases challenging various gun laws, since the highly case-specific nature of the jurisprudence in this area means that each type of law must be analyzed separately.

Answer:

Which of these arguments might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws?

Finance laws violate the right to free speech.

Wealthy people have earned the right to make big campaign donations.

A corporation should be free to support whomever it wishes.

Explanation:

The argument that might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws is the Corporations and labor unions that have too much power.

Option D is correct.

Financial law is defined as the law and standard or regulation of the derivatives, insurance, commercial banking, investment management sectors, and capital markets.

The person that supports the strict campaign finance laws are the companies or corporations and the labor unions, because they have a too much power in the finance laws.

Hence, option D is correct.

To learn more about the finance laws, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/515053

Abolitionists were angered by the Dred Scott decision, which they considered a method for the Supreme Court to put an end to the debate about slavery in the territories Hence option B

The Dred Scott decision was a March 6, 1857 opinion by the United States Supreme Court that being in a free state or territory did not entitle an enslaved individual, Dred Scott, to his freedom. Scott, being someone's property, was not a citizen, and hence could not sue in federal court, according to the verdict.

So, in the aforementioned facts, northerners were disappointed with the Dred Scott verdicts since they said that slavery would become legal everywhere.

Learn more about Dred's decisions:

brainly.com/question/23987166

#SPJ1

Answer: South East

Explanation: This exact question I already saw on brainly so thats how I got this answer.

Explanation:

New technologies can bring about a range of changes and impacts on society, including:

Improved efficiency and productivity in various industries, as well as the creation of new industries and job opportunities.

Increased access to information and knowledge through the internet, which has facilitated communication, education, and research.

Transformation of social norms and behavior, such as the rise of social media and the impact it has had on communication, socialization, and activism.

Changes in cultural values, as new technologies have the potential to alter the way people think, interact, and perceive the world around them.

Environmental impacts, as new technologies can have both positive and negative effects on the natural environment, such as reducing carbon emissions or contributing to pollution.

Overall, new technologies have the potential to bring about significant changes and advancements in various aspects of society, but they can also have unintended consequences that need to be carefully monitored and addressed.

Answer:

People start undertaking new professions as a result of new technology, while old jobs perish.

Explanation:

The Espionage Act, enacted in 1917 during World War I, had a significant impact on freedom of speech in the United States. The correct answer is:

B. It made it dangerous to oppose the draft.

The Espionage Act included provisions that criminalized certain forms of speech and expression that were seen as disloyal or undermining the war effort.

One of the main targets of the act was opposition to the military draft, as it sought to suppress any anti-war sentiment or activities that could potentially hinder recruitment efforts.

Read more on Espionage Act here https://brainly.com/question/9655451

#SPJ1

Answer:

Compare and contrast agricultural society and post-industrial society. What are the differences and how do these differences matter for the people who live in these societies? Do they have anything in common?

Explanation:

The sources of innovation in a post‐industrial society are derived increasingly from the codification of theoretical knowledge, rather than from “random” inventions.

Whereas preindustrial and industrial societies are based on the production of tangible goods, postindustrial societies produce information and services.

Based on the social, historical, and cultural contexts, I would classify Joan Miro's painting, The Farm, as a Western artwork.

The painting was created in 1921 when John Miro was living in Paris, France, which was a major center of artistic innovation in the Western world. The painting also shows clear influences from the cubist movement.

The Farm may be inspired by a specific location in Catalonia, its style, techniques, and historical context align it more closely with Western art movements of the early 20th century. Therefore, I would classify it as a Western artwork.

Learn more about Joan Miro here:

https://brainly.com/question/14395425

#SPJ1