When something has already taken place you can use it as a rule of law o Start matching if you like the holding of the case

Intellectual property can be legally protected even though it is not a physical object. This statement is true.

Intellectual property (IP) refers to the set of property rights that arise from the creation of the mind. Some examples of intellectual property include inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, and symbols and names.

The term intellectual property refers to creations of the mind such as inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images used in commerce. Intellectual property is intangible, meaning it cannot be touched or seen. However, it is protected by law. Intellectual property rights are rights given to individuals over the creations of their minds, allowing them to control the use of their creations for a limited time.

Learn more about Intellectual property

https://brainly.com/question/30554069

#SPJ11

Answer:

you take from me

ghdhdhdufufuufuf

Answer:

Over time, voting rights have been expanding in a notorious and fair way. Thus, initially, only white men with high purchasing power of legal age could exercise their right to vote. Subsequently, the economic requirement was abolished, allowing all white men to exercise this right.

After the Civil War, the northern states of the country allowed African Americans the right to vote, while the southern states exercised segregation over them. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, women, through feminist movements, obtained the right to participate in elections. Finally, African Americans consolidated their right to vote after the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed.

Attempt robbery or dacoity while armed with a lethal we-apon.— If the criminal is armed with a dangerous we-apon while attempting to commit robbery... dacoity, the im­prisonment with which such offender must be sentenced shall  Law.

Central Government Law committing grave harm voluntarily utilizing dangerous we-apon or ways —Whoever, except as provided in section 335, voluntarily causes grievous harm by means of any instrument for shooting, stabbing, or cutting, or any instrument which, when used as a we=apon of offence, is likely to cause death, or by means of fire or any heated substance, or by means of any poison or corrosive substance.

To learn more about Law, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ1

Answer: I scratch your back... you scratch mine?

I need some help too so could you look at my question after these answers?

Explanation:

In simple terms:

Capitalism is a type of economic system mostly in which the rich own and control private property and "private actors" according to their interests for and in society.

Communism: Also can be considered an "Economic system" except this one individual people do not own land or factories or anything. The whole community and government own these things. Everyone shares the wealth everyone creates.

Socialism: Also an economic system and political one too. This one is a type of way to "organize society"

In this one, the overall goal is to spread the wealth in fair amounts. If Im rich with 2 in the household and you're poor with 2 in the household and their a scarce in food. The government will evenly divide the food to all. The rich will get a total of 3 potatoes and the poor as well. Because I am rich I will not get more, because you are poor, you will not get less. It's about fairness and being even. What a nice government :)

Marxism:

There si no type of class in this government. Everyone in society works for a common good and the casual "class struggle" is no longer in existence. No labels, we are all one.

Good answer? If not lmk and Ill help you out a little more

Answer:

Explanation:

Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.

The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.

For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.

In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Nationalism is an idea and movement that holds that the nation should be congruent with the state. As a movement, nationalism tends to promote the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.

Nationalism is the belief that your own country is better than all others. Sometimes nationalism makes people not want to work with other countries to solve shared problems. Patriotism is a healthy pride in your country that brings about feelings of loyalty and a desire to help other citizens.

Answer:

1 True

2 False

3 True

4 True

5 False

6 False

7 True

8 False

9 True

10 True

11 True

12 True

13 False

9

Answer:

The answer is True!

Explanation:

Because, A police officer have to gain trust! just like everyday people.

Answer:

True

"Once accepted into the ranks of the police, an individual is introduced to the police subculture, which is a set of norms and values governing police behavior. One of the reasons why this subculture exists is due to the danger, stress, and isolation that are common in police work. Recruits learn these values and norms starting in the training that they receive at police academies. They learn not only the formal rules about policing but also the informal ones that are expected by others in this subculture. At the heart of the police subculture is the obligation of support and loyalty to other police officers. Other aspects that also play a role are group solidarity, honor, and respect for police authority."

Explanation:

The majority of Americans, for example, have more trust and confidence in the police than they have in almost any other institution. However, opinions of the police have long been lower in areas where crime is most heavily concentrated. ... The U.S. criminal justice system is more fair and effective than ever.

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Cuz Connor is the land owner he has the right to say rather or not he wants children in his apartment.

It is completely appropriate and correct to mention that the corporations may underreport cybercrime, because of concerns about data breach liabilities, damage to brand, regulatory issues, and loss of consumer confidence. Therefore, the statement given above holds true.

A cybercrime can be referred to or considered as a form of criminal activity that takes place over the internet using a computer or a network of computers. Such crimes are handled by a completely different department of police authorities.

There have been instances where the plaintiffs have underreported their cybercrime, as they are concerned about the breach of their private data and confidential information.

Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of a cybercrime.

Learn more about cybercrime here:

https://brainly.com/question/28836591

#SPJ12

False. if, before the time for contract performance, one party communicates an intent not to perform, the other party can only wait to see if the repudiating party will decide to perform.

What is repudiating party?

When one party backs out of a deal with another, it is referred to as repudiation. Frequently, the party renouncing the contract is unable to fulfill its duties under the terms of the agreement because of financial constraints. The courts may decide on a contract breach. In other words, the other party to a contract has the right to accept the other party's repudiation and choose to end the deal if the other party refuses or cannot perform the obligations imposed on them by the contract. When you reject something or someone, you are expressing your adamant disagreement with them and your desire to have no more dealings with them. Leaders urged people to protest the violence by showing up in big numbers.

To learn more about repudiating party click on the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/17293791

#SPJ1

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

-A court will not open a case or post a judgment until Isabel chooses to respond.

-A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

-A court can judge in Isabel's favor even if she doesn't respond if it appears Sages allegations are frivolous.

The answer is A court can judge in Sage favor because Isabel is not bargaining in good faith.

Explanation:

Answer:

A court can judge in Sage's favor because Isabel seems to be constructively admitting to Sage's allegations.

Explanation:

Answer: A

Explanation:

Answer: True

I am very happy to help you.

Explanation:

Answer:

The deception took place via rather than in person.

Answer:

C. No loss was suffered nor intended

Explanation:

Answer:

no

you're not in common law marriage after 7 years together but it's under that duration you can

Answer:

The several banks in Ghana had collapsed. The banks were given license few years ago. The banks were heavily deficient in liquidity and they had instability in financial systems.

Explanation:

There have been mergers of some banks in Ghana which lead to financial system inconsistencies. There was continuous mobilization of fund which resulted in unstable deposits. The challenges have been addressed by Implementing Institution Act of 2016.

The statement is true because a court can depart from a precedent if the precedent is no longer valid.

This is because the legal system recognizes that the law is constantly evolving and changing, and as such, precedents may become outdated or no longer relevant to current circumstances.

In such cases, it is appropriate for a court to depart from a precedent and establish a new legal principle that is more in line with current legal and societal expectations.

However, it is important to note that courts generally only depart from precedents in exceptional circumstances and after careful consideration of all relevant factors, such as the impact of the new ruling on legal certainty and consistency.

Learn more about court https://brainly.com/question/11622979

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is a effect

Explanation:

pollution is very bad for everything

The  Federal bureaucracy  part of   the department of defense the u.s.

The Federal Bureaucracy is the unelected, administrative body in the Executive Branch. It is the back bone of the US Government. It is arranged into departments, agencies and commissions.

The term bureaucracy literally means “rule by desks.” It is an institution that is hierarchical in nature and exists to formulate, enact, and enforce public policy in an efficient and equitable manner.

All of the approximately 2,000 federal government agencies, divisions, departments, and commissions are examples of bureaucracies. The most visible of those bureaucracies include the Social Security Administration, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Veterans Benefits Administration.

Learn more about federal bureaucracy to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/4513102

#SPJ4

Answer:

Law enforcement is the group of people tasked with the prevention of crime and apprehension of offenders. As part of law enforcement, police officers have four major responsibilities: enforcing laws, preventing crimes, responding to emergencies, and providing support services.

Explanation:

A mini-trial is an alternative method for resolving a legal dispute from a formal court trial. A mini-trial is a confidential, voluntary process where the attorneys for each party present their client's case in a condensed manner, much as at a trial.

A neutral adviser and representatives from each side with the power to resolve the disagreement attend the presentations. These representatives are often high-level corporate leaders. The delegates try to resolve the disagreement following the presentations.

In the event that the representatives are unable to resolve the conflict, the impartial adviser may, at the request of the parties, act as a mediator or provide a non-binding prediction of how the case will likely turn out. An alternative to a regular court trial is a mini-trial, which can be used to settle a legal disagreement. Like mediations and arbitrations, mini-trials are distinct types of "alternative dispute resolution".

Learn more about mini-trials here:

https://brainly.com/question/33010314

#SPJ4

Yes, the taxpayer can expect the court to follow its earlier holding.The district courts in the United States are the federal trial courts.

The federal court system comprises of district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court.

As the main trial court, the district court hears civil and criminal cases. It may be helpful to consult the earlier holding to better understand the court's decision in the current case.

In Utah, the district court rendered a decision. As a result, the taxpayer, who lives in Utah, can anticipate the court to adhere to its previous holding.

The legal holding is a binding decision made by a court in the process of resolving a legal dispute. The holding is a conclusion or decision reached by the judge or court after analyzing the legal issues raised in a case. It provides a precedent that must be followed in similar future cases.

to know more about taxpayer refer here

https://brainly.com/question/29664276#

#SPJ11

Answer:

that's true

Explanation:

in all the questionnaire as already stated it all, electorate should be allowed to exercise their franchise because that's one of the right a citizen of a state or country is entitled to

If Ramish died intestate, the order of inheritance would depend on the laws of intestacy in the jurisdiction where Ramish resided at the time of his death.

Generally, the first priority would be given to Ramish's spouse, if he had one. If Ramish did not have a spouse, then his children would typically be next in line to inherit.

If Ramish had no living spouse or children, then his parents, siblings, or other close relatives might be entitled to inherit according to the laws of intestacy. However, the specific order of inheritance and rules governing intestate succession can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the particular circumstances of the case.

To know more about Inheritance related question visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14930526

#SPJ11

Common law, contract law, equity law and statue law are defined in detail below the statement.

Real Estate is property comprised of land and the buildings on it, along with its natural resources such as crops, minerals or water; not movable property of this nature; an interest endowed in this an item of real property, buildings or housing in general.

1. Common law, also called case law, is a body of unwritten laws based on a legal model established by the courts. Common law draws from institutionalized opinions and interpretations from judicial authorities and public juries.

2. A contract is an agreement between two or more parties, creating mutual obligations that are enacted by law. The basic elements required for the agreement to be a legally enacted contract are: mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and acceptance; adequate consideration; capacity; and legality.

3.The term "equity" in law refers to a particular set of remedies and associated methods involved in civil law. These equitable doctrines and methods are distinguished from "legal" ones.

4. Statutory law or statute law is written law passed by a body of legislature or parliament. This is opposed to oral or customary law; or regulatory law declare by the executive or common law of the judiciary. Statutes may originate with national, state legislatures or local municipalities in a country.

Therefore, the above mentioned are the laws of Australian real estate.

Learn more about Real Estate here:

https://brainly.com/question/28259496

#SPJ1

Greg won't need to post bail or hand over any property deeds to ensure his attendance; he will be freed on his own recognizance.

"Soft or delicate in texture or consistence; yielding easily to force or pressure; fragile; easily broken, divided, compressed, or wounded," according to the dictionary, describes what tender means. Keats and Fitzgerald appear to be telling us that the night is particularly vulnerable in this way.

This book is a masterpiece from beginning to end, and I've read it numerous times, getting something new out of each reading. It is a tragedy, a romance, and a wellspring of rich, poetic prose.

To know more about bail visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30054626

#SPJ1

Answer:

The term "Judeo Christian" first appears in a letter from Alexander McCaul which is dated October 17, 1821. The term in this case referred to Jewish converts to Christianity. The term was similarly used by Joseph Wolff in 1829, in reference to a type of church that would observe some Jewish traditions in order to convert Jews. Mark Silk states in the early 19th century the term was "most widely used (in French as well as English) to refer to the early followers of Jesus who opposed" the wishes of Paul the Apostle and wanted "to restrict the message of Jesus to Jews and who insisted on maintaining Jewish law and ritual".

Explanation:

hope this helps

let me know if I’m correct