When Driving on a suspended license first offense what will happens first is an OAS can mean up to 10 days in jail and/or a $1,000 fine.
What happen when you are Driving on a suspended license?Technically, an OAS can result in up to 10 days in jail and/or a $1,000 fine for a first offense. A felony may be charged for a third offense, which carries a sentence of up to a year in prison. Your license will also be suspended for an extra sixty days if you are found guilty of operating while it has been suspended.
If you are found guilty of violating California Vehicle Code 14601 in Los Angeles County, you may be sentenced to jail time, a fine, or both.
Learn more about license at:
https://brainly.com/question/18611420
#SPJ1
What is the main idea or argument of the pew research center source, or what information does it contain? did it help you identify any reasons to support your claim? did you find the evidence you might be able to use in your argument? if so, what? (2 points)
The Pew Research Center offers reliable information about the world economy.
What is the economy?An economy of a country is calculated with the help of manufacturing and consumption took place. If the manufacturing is adequate and consumption is also similar then it shows that citizens have good purchasing parity.
The pew research center source contains information that is based on facts and has credential sources.
This information is used for a variety of things, including serving as an accurate source of information in any type of writing about the economy or society.
This information can be used for arguments as this has authenticity to prove the point of an individual based on accurate facts.
Learn more about pew research center, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14694598
#SPJ1
True or False: Motorcyclists have half of the rights and responsibilities on public roadways as automobile
drivers
Answer:
No it's of course false it do not have
The statement that motorcyclists have half of the rights and responsibilities on public roadways as automobile drivers is false because they have same rights and responsibilities.
What are motorcyclists rights and responsibilities?Motorcycle ownership is a privilege rather than a right. If you don't keep your end of the contract, you can suffer dire penalties, including physical harm or even death. If they want to continue riding, motorcycle riders must fulfil a number of obligations, such as:
Obeying all applicable state traffic rules.Obeying all motorcycle-specific legislation; Possessing proof of legal financial responsibility in the form of bonds, liability insurance, or self-insurance.completing the necessary training and skill-building programmes, and obtaining a motorcycle licence or endorsement.using the proper safety equipmentdriving sensiblyTo know more about motorcyclist rights and responsibilities https://brainly.com/question/1510975
#SPJ2
TRUE / FALSE. issues where international governments seek to elevate environmental awareness are often referred to as green issues.
The statement is true. Issues where international governments work to increase environmental awareness are commonly referred to as green issues. The term "green" is associated with environment sustainability.
Issues related to elevating environmental awareness and promoting sustainable practices are frequently referred to as green issues. These issues encompass a wide range of environmental concerns, including climate change, biodiversity loss, pollution, deforestation, and resource depletion. International governments, organizations, and individuals collaborate to tackle these challenges and raise awareness about the importance of environmental conservation.
The term "green" has become a common shorthand for environmental sustainability and eco-consciousness. It symbolizes efforts to protect the planet, reduce ecological footprints, and transition to greener and more sustainable practices. By using the term "green issues," people can easily identify topics and initiatives associated with environmental protection and sustainability.
Governments across the globe actively engage in international agreements, conferences, and policies to address green issues. These initiatives often focus on promoting renewable energy, reducing carbon emissions, implementing sustainable land and resource management practices, and encouraging environmental education and awareness. The term "green issues" serves as a convenient label to encompass these diverse environmental concerns and highlight the importance of collective action for a more sustainable future.
To earn more about environment: -brainly.com/question/5511643#SPJ11
Interest groups (4 points)
have lobbyists that usually provide misinformation to public officials
• create political action committees to run campaigns for its members
form based on people's shared issues, viewpoints, or experiences
O make coalitions in order to weaken the voices of individual people
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Name the change of state accuring in Throwing snow
The change of state occurring when throwing snow is a physical change known as "melting."
When snow is thrown, the kinetic energy and heat transferred from the person's hand to the snowflakes cause the ice crystals to absorb heat energy. As the temperature rises above the snow's melting point (0 degrees Celsius or 32 degrees Fahrenheit), the solid ice undergoes a phase transition and transforms into liquid water. This change is facilitated by the breaking of hydrogen bonds between the water molecules in the snow, allowing them to move more freely and take on the liquid form. The process of melting involves an increase in the internal energy of the snowflakes, which leads to the rearrangement of the water molecules into a less structured arrangement, resulting in the formation of water droplets.
Learn more about kinetic energy here:
https://brainly.com/question/999862
#SPJ11
Jurisdiction over a defendant is referred to as subject matter jurisdiction. True or False
It is False that Jurisdiction over a defendant is not referred to as subject matter jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction is the authority that a court has to hear a particular type of case based on the subject matter of the case.
Jurisdiction over a defendant, on the other hand, is referred to as personal jurisdiction or territorial jurisdiction.Personal jurisdiction is the court’s power over the defendant, which is acquired by providing the defendant with notice of the proceedings and affording the defendant an opportunity to be heard. Personal jurisdiction may be obtained in a number of ways, including through the defendant’s presence in the state, through the defendant’s consent to jurisdiction, or through the defendant’s contacts with the state.Territorial jurisdiction refers to the court’s authority to hear cases that arise within a particular geographic area, such as a state or county. Territorial jurisdiction is established by statute or constitution and is based on the geographic location of the events that gave rise to the case.In conclusion, subject matter jurisdiction and personal or territorial jurisdiction are different types of jurisdiction that are important for courts to have in order to hear and decide cases.
to know about Jurisdiction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
Is interest earned income?
☁️ Answer ☁️
I don't understand.. but here:
The interest that is earned on those investments over a period of time is considered income.
Hope it helps.
Have a nice day noona/hyung!~  ̄▽ ̄❤️
Describe what an officer must demonstrate to justify an emergency search.
Answer:
Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself
Explanation:
Witness testimony should not be relied heavily on in a courtroom because ______it can be
A-unfair since it is so accurate
B-unimportant to the crime
C-unreliable and inaccurate
D- a distraction for the jurors
Name
Answer: unreliable and inaccurate
Explanation:
The government form that provides notice to the alien of the pending immigration removal charges filed against him/her is called:
Answer: Notice to Appear (NTA) policy memorandum (PM) (PDF, 599.37 KB) providing guidance on when USCIS may issue Form I-862, Notice to Appear. An NTA is a document that instructs an individual to appear before an immigration judge. This is the first step in starting removal proceedings against them
U.S. v. Rodney (page 263)
1.List all the facts and circumstances necessary to interrogate the individual privacy/law enforcement balance ideal in crotch searches.
The U.S. v. Rodney case, which is discussed on page 263, is related to the balance between individual privacy and law enforcement practices when it comes to crotch searches.
In order to interrogate this balance ideal, the following facts and circumstances are relevant:
The nature of the crime: The case involved the investigation of a drug trafficking organization, which made it necessary for law enforcement to conduct searches for drugs on individuals.The location of the search: In this case, the search was conducted in a public place, which means that the individual had a reduced expectation of privacy compared to if the search had been conducted in a private location.The reason for the search: The search was conducted on Rodney because he had been observed making a drug deal and was suspected of carrying drugs. This gave law enforcement probable cause to conduct a search.The method of the search: The search was conducted using a pat-down technique, which involved touching the area around Rodney's crotch. This is a sensitive area that could be considered invasive and may raise concerns about individual privacy.The gender of the searcher: In this case, the search was conducted by a female police officer, which could be considered relevant due to the gender-specific nature of the search.The duration of the search: The search was relatively brief, which could be seen as mitigating concerns about the invasion of privacy.The outcome of the search: No drugs were found during the search, which could be seen as both a positive and a negative outcome. On the one hand, it means that Rodney's privacy was invaded without a successful outcome. On the other hand, it means that law enforcement was not able to find any evidence of drug trafficking, which could be seen as a failure of the search.Overall, these facts and circumstances highlight the tension between individual privacy and law enforcement practices when it comes to crotch searches. While such searches may be necessary in certain circumstances, they must be conducted in a way that respects individual privacy rights and balances them against the needs of law enforcement.
Learn more about U.S. v. Rodney: https://brainly.com/question/28865108
#SPJ11
A trademark is an example of a legal monopoly. It means ________.
1. an identifying symbol or name
2. an exclusive legal right to make, use, or sell the invention for a limited time a
3.protection for the life of the author plus 70 years
A trademark is an identifying symbol or name that is used to distinguish a company's goods or services from those of its competitors. It is an example of a legal monopoly.
It means that the owner of the trademark has the exclusive legal right to use that trademark in connection with their goods or services. This legal monopoly means that no one else can use the same or similar trademark in a way that is likely to cause confusion or dilution of the original trademark's value. The owner of a trademark can renew their legal monopoly indefinitely as long as they continue to use the trademark in commerce and meet other legal requirements. Overall, a trademark is a valuable asset for businesses as it helps them establish brand recognition and protect their intellectual property rights.
To learn more about trademark, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26718803
#SPJ11
Among adolescents and adults, alcohol use is involved in up to 70% of deaths
associated with water recreation activities.
TRUE
FALSE
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because its logic
explain what non-violent direct action is and why it can be so successful.
Answer:
Nonviolent direct action may include sit-ins, strikes, street blockades, sabotage, and counter-economics. Violent direct action may include political violence, assault, arson and property destruction.
Explanation:
Answer:
Martin Luther King Jr.'s decision to utilize nonviolence was based on religious principles. In fact, King discovered the use of nonviolent action as a political tool through learning about Gandhi's success in India.
King's approach was specifically Christian in orientation, drawing on his own status as a minister and the centrality of the Church in the lives of the Montgomery, Alabama, African-Americans who were the first protestors he led. His speeches utilized the inspirational crescendo structure of African-American sermonizing and he typically used biblical themes in them. This provided a deeper source of unity than the specific issue at hand and his able lieutenants were drawn from the rolls of black preachers.
King's methods were "step-wise." The King Center lists six:
Step One. Information gathering
Step Two. Education
Step Three. Personal commitment
Step Four. Negotiations
Step Five. Direct action
Step Six. Reconciliation
Creating opportunities for resolution without confrontation and ensuring that both proponents and adversaries have sufficiently accurate information to make decisions both about the issue and the process.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
what makes you laugh out loud?
Answer:
when someone says a joke
Explanation:
Answer:
Enjoying jokes of joker
having fun with friends
doing the dumb stuff you do
Which of the following is the most relevant statement for why rescue is particularly important for U.S. Navy firefighters? They know how to operate emergency equipment. They know how to operate emergency equipment. It is the job of a Navy firefighter. It is the job of a Navy firefighter. They are firefighters who serve in other contexts. They are firefighters who serve in other contexts. They have great responsibility to fellow sailors. They have great responsibility to fellow sailors.
Option fourth is correct. The rescue is particularly important for U.S. Navy firefighters because they have great responsibility to fellow sailors.
About U.S. Navy
A member of the eight military branches of the United States, the United States Navy (USN) seems to be the maritime service arm of the US Armed Forces. With an estimated tonnage of its operational battle fleet alone surpassing the next 13 fleets combined, includes 11 allies or partners of the U. S. as of 2015, it is the largest and also most potent navy in the world. With eleven active carriers, two under construction, and five more planned, it possesses the largest fleet of aircraft carriers worldwide and the highest combined battle fleet tonnage.
To know more about U.S. Navy:
brainly.com/question/91175
#SPJ1
contract law provides those without the capacity to contract with the right to escape the legal consequences of contracts they enter TRUE/FALSE
The statement "contract law provides those without the capacity to contract with the right to escape the legal consequences of contracts they enter" is false.
Contract law generally does not provide those without the capacity to contract with the right to escape the legal consequences of contracts they enter into. In most legal systems, individuals who lack the capacity to contract, such as minors or individuals with mental impairments, are protected by special rules. These rules often make their contracts voidable, meaning they have the option to either enforce or void the contract.
However, there are exceptions and variations in different jurisdictions, and the extent of protection can depend on factors such as age, mental capacity, and the nature of the contract. It is advisable for individuals without the capacity to contract to seek legal guidance to understand their specific rights and obligations in contractual matters.
To know more about contracts , refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/984979#
#SPJ11
Concept on clashes with considarartion to values
Answer:
Concept on clashes with consideration to values is described below in details.
Explanation:
A conflict originating from the interplay of people with diverse cultural values. There are two types of conflict in history: Internal conflict is within the character's psyche. Internal conflict can be characterized as a conflict between resisting forces of passion or sentiments within a person. External is a struggle between a persona and an external force.
Based on the case law presented in the unit lessons, which statement BEST represents students’ rights in schools?
A.
Public schools have a nearly totalitarian amount of control over students and their rights.
B.
Students enjoy all of the rights and responsibilities of adults, even when they are in schools.
C.
Students’ free speech rights are broad, but they have less Fourth Amendment rights.
D.
Schools act as an extension of the government when it comes to search and seizure rights.
Based on the case law presented in the unit lessons, the statement that BEST represents students' rights in schools is option C: Students' free speech rights are broad, but they have fewer Fourth Amendment rights.
The case law has established that students do possess free speech rights, which are protected under the First Amendment. However, these rights can be limited by school administrators if they can demonstrate a reasonable justification that the speech would cause a material disruption to the school environment. On the other hand, students have fewer Fourth Amendment rights concerning search and seizure in schools. Courts have recognized that schools have a responsibility to maintain a safe and orderly environment, allowing administrators greater leeway to conduct searches and seizures if there is reasonable suspicion.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/7955252
#SPJ11
Which ethical system or systems most reflect the thinking used by the court in this case
Answer:1
Explanation:
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Which modern criminology has most supplemented its naturalistic ideas with lessons drawn from
religion and spirituality?
A. institutional anomie
B. newsmaking
C. peacemaking
D. critical race theory
Answer:
c peacemaking
Explanation:
Why is it important to keep legal correspondence short?
Answer:
because that if there were no law there would be Robers all in the world
A spouse can be provided information such as hospital
admission dates as long as they have which validating
information? Select all that apply.
Social security number
Marriage Contract
Date of birth
Driver's license
Answer:
Social Security number and Marriage contact
Statutory law is created by which branch of government ?
What is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract?.
Anticipatory Repudiation is the term for the action of a party to a contract who notifies the other party that he or she will not perform his or her duty under a contract.
Legally, one birthday party's failure to meet any of its contractual obligations is called a "breach" of the agreement. Relying on the specifics, a breach can occur when a party fails to carry out on time, does not perform in accordance with the terms of the settlement, or does now not carry out in any respect.
Events to the settlement can are seeking special types of remedies in court with a view to mitigating losses stemming from the breach, together with damages (financial repayment) and equitable treatments inclusive of unique overall performance (forcing the breaching party to observe via its obligations).
Learn more about contracts here https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
Describe the kinds of intelligence that are collected.
Human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery intelligence (IMINT), measurement and signatures intelligence (MASINT), and open source intelligence are among these disciplines (OSINT). Each of these disciplines is used to some extent by adversaries against the United States.
Human Intelligence (HUMINT) is the gathering of data from human sources. The collection can take place openly, such as when FBI agents interview witnesses or suspects, or it can take place clandestinely or covertly (espionage). The FBI is in charge of collecting HUMINT in the United States.
Data collection is an important step in the intelligence cycle because it involves gathering information.
To know more about Human intelligence here
https://brainly.com/question/28216008
#SPJ1
Pat and Terry have lived as a couple for two years in New Hampshire. Pat has beaten Terry more than once. Terry has been in the hospital several times as a result. Terry is afraid of Pat and has moved out. Pat keeps making threats in their phone conversations and has promised that no one will ever see Terry again. Terry is afraid and decides to record all phone calls with Pat. This morning, Pat called and said “No one will ever find your body!” and hung up.
If Terry goes to the police, do you think law enforcement could use the recording in court? Why or why not?
Answer:
Yes, law enforcement can use the recording in court because it is a direct personal threat.
Explanation:
Pat is threatening Terry with violence and possible murder, which is impiled when Pat said "No one will ever find your body". This can be used in court to support Terry's case that Pat has or could become violent and hurt Terry at some point.
Which is the committee formed by the US Attorney General in 1981
The US Attorney General formed the ___________________ coordinating committee (LECC) in 1981 to faculae cooperation and coordination across law-enforcement agencies at all levels
Explanation:
The law enforcement coordinating committee
hope it helps please mark as brainliest