When courts are faced with interpreting a contract to determine the meaning and legal effect of the terms used by the parties, the court will first attempt to determine the parties' intent.
The court will look to the language of the contract and will consider the circumstances under which the contract was formed, such as the negotiation process between the parties, any prior agreements between them, and the surrounding circumstances. If the parties have clear, unambiguous language expressing their intentions, the court will give effect to the language used.
If, however, the language of the contract is open to multiple interpretations, the court will consider extrinsic evidence, such as past performance, prohibited use of the contract for something other than its stated purpose, or any other details that might shed light on what the parties intended. Ultimately, the court will endeavor to interpret the language in a manner that carries out the intentions of the parties.
To know more about court , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13375489
#SPJ4
Choose the response that best defines gross income.
All worldwide income realized in any form, from whatever source derived, unless specifically excluded by law.
Financial gain derived from labor or capital, less any deductions or adjustments.
Income less allowable reductions.
Specific income items identified and classified as taxable income.
Answer:
Specific income items identified and classified as taxable income.
Explanation:
Which of the following is a reason for the problems that plague jails
You didn't give a list, but here are some reasons! Overcrowding: Jails are often overcrowded, making it difficult to maintain a safe and healthy environment for both staff and inmates.
Staffing shortages: A shortage of trained and qualified staff can lead to increased violence and disorder within the jail.
Budget constraints: Jails often operate on limited budgets, which can result in insufficient resources for programs and services that can reduce recidivism.
Mental health issues: A significant number of people in jail have mental health problems, which can create challenges for staff and negatively impact the overall operation of the jail.
Substance abuse: Substance abuse is a major problem in many jails, leading to a range of health and safety issues.
Lack of rehabilitation programs: Jails often lack programs and services that can help inmates improve their lives and reduce their risk of reoffending.
Lack of technology: Inadequate technology can result in ineffective communication, security, and management of the jail.
Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court lever is called
a/an?
Answer:
Trevor1984. Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court level is called an appeal
Bài 1: Công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài đăng kí doanh nghiệp ngày 10/10/2015 với 3 cổ đông sáng lập là A, B, C. Công ty có vốn điều lệ là 1 tỷ và phát hành 100.000 cổ phiếu (mỗi cổ phần trị giá 10.000 đồng) trong đó cổ phần phổ thông 800 triệu, 50 triệu CPUD biểu quyết và 150 triệu CPUD cổ tức. Hỏi: a, A, B, C phải đăng kí mua ít nhất bao nhiêu cổ phần phổ thông. b, Ông Đức nắm giữ 10% cổ phần của công ty và muốn mua thêm cổ phần ưu đãi biểu quyết của công ty Tấn Tài. Yêu cầu trên có được không. C, Tháng 10/2019 ông A do không hài lòng với các chính sách của công ty nên đã chuyển nhượng các cổ phần của mình cho người khác. - Ông A có được chuyển nhượng không? Vì sao? - Nếu A chuyển nhượng hết thì hậu quả pháp lý đối với công ty Cổ phần Tấn Tài là gì?
Explanation:
get Garbrumeyjjethztjarhatjztjafnatmstbatnatntn
what are the role of public prosecuter in Court
Answer:
Explanation:The role public prosecutor to represent the executive for trying the offender. While broadly his responsibility is to see that the trial results in conviction, but he need not be obsessively concerned about the outcome of the case.
___________ prints occur when a finger touches or presses against plastic material and creates a negative impression of its friction ridge pattern.
Jocelyn Stay silent Confess Brian and Jocelyn are arrested and charged with armed robbery. The police interview both suspects separately about their involvement in the crime. Each suspect has to make a decision. They can betray the other suspect by confessing that they both committed the crime, or they can cooperate with the other suspect by remaining silent. The table shows the sentences that Brian and Jocelyn will receive given their choices. Use the table to answer the question. Jocelyn gets 10 years Jocelyn gets 5 years Stay silent Brian gets 10 years Brian gets 15 years Brian Jocelyn gets 15 years Jocelyn gets 12 years What will be the dominant strategy outcome for Brian and Jocelyn? Confess Brian gets 5 years Brian gets 12 years Jocelyn gets 5 years, and Brian gets 15 years. They both get 12 years. They both get 10 years. O Brian gets 5 years, and Jocelyn gets 15 years. Coca-Cola Strategy 1 Strategy 2 B
The dominant strategy outcome for Brian and Jocelyn would be to confess. This is because if one confesses, and the other stays silent, the one who confesses gets a lower sentence (5 years) than if they both stayed silent (10 years). Additionally, if both confess, they both get a lower sentence (12 years) than if they both stayed silent (10 years) or if one stayed silent and the other confessed (15 years). Therefore, confessing is the most beneficial strategy for both suspects.
Confession in law refers to a statement made by an individual admitting to committing a crime or offence. Confessions can be made voluntarily or obtained through coercion, and their admissibility in court depends on various factors, including the circumstances under which they were obtained and the reliability of the statement. Confessions are often considered to be strong evidence in criminal cases, but the use of coerced confessions is prohibited under the law. Additionally, the admissibility of confessions may be challenged by the defence if there is evidence of coercion, duress, or other factors that may undermine their credibility. Ultimately, the use of confessions in legal proceedings is complex and subject to various legal standards and procedures.
Learn more about Confession: https://brainly.com/question/31088899.
#SPJ11
Which group does not have their own standard form construction contracts?
A. American Institute of Architects (AIA)
B. Associated General Contractors of America (AGC)
C. American Institute of Constructions (AIC)
D. The Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC)
The American Institute of Construction or the AIC do not have their own standard form of the construction contracts.
The correct option is option C.
A construction contract is basically a contract which is specifically negotiated for the purpose of construction of a particular asset or a combination of a few assets which are closely interrelated or are interdependent in the terms of their design, function, technology or their purpose or use.
A construction contract can possibly be negotiated for the construction of a single asset for example, a building, a bridge, a road, a dam etc. The American Institute of Construction do not have their own standard form of the construction contracts.
To know more about construction contract
https://brainly.com/question/15276606
#SPJ4
Will the global power struggle ever end? Defend both positions (yes and no). Which position do you find most compelling and why? Be sure to incorporate Realist and Liberal arguments as well as examples from your text. Cite all sources.
Answer:
The question of whether the global power struggle will ever end is a complex one, with compelling arguments on both sides. On one hand, it can be argued that the global power struggle will never end, as states will always seek to maximize their power and influence in order to ensure their survival and security. This realist perspective suggests that international politics is inherently competitive, with states competing for resources, territory, and influence. In this view, the international system is a zero-sum game, where one state's gain is another's loss.
Proponents of this view argue that even in a world where cooperation and interdependence have increased, the underlying competition between states remains. For example, despite the growing economic interdependence between the United States and China, there are still tensions and conflicts between the two countries over issues such as trade, human rights, and territorial disputes in the South China Sea. Additionally, the ongoing arms race between nuclear-armed states such as the United States, Russia, and China suggests that states are still pursuing military power and strategic advantage.
On the other hand, it can be argued that the global power struggle can be mitigated and eventually overcome through cooperation and the development of global governance institutions. This liberal perspective suggests that states can work together to address common problems and pursue common goals, such as economic development, environmental protection, and human rights. In this view, the international system is not a zero-sum game, but rather a positive-sum game where cooperation can benefit all parties involved.
Proponents of this view point to examples of successful international cooperation, such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and the International Criminal Court. These institutions and agreements demonstrate that states can work together to address global challenges and promote shared values. Additionally, the growth of civil society organizations and transnational social movements suggests that individuals and groups beyond the state are playing an increasingly important role in shaping international politics.
In my opinion, while the realist argument has some merit, I find the liberal perspective more compelling. While competition between states may never fully disappear, I believe that cooperation and global governance institutions can help mitigate the negative effects of this competition and promote greater stability and prosperity for all. The examples of successful international cooperation and the growth of civil society organizations and transnational social movements give me hope that a more peaceful and cooperative global order is possible.
Sources:
Mearsheimer, J. (2019). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Yale University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and Interdependence (3rd ed.). Longman.
United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from
Paris Agreement. (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from
Explanation:
officers who patrol smaller areas, especially in small towns, tend to
Officers who patrol smaller areas, especially in small towns, tend to have closer relationships with the communities they serve.
This can lead to greater familiarity with local residents and businesses, as well as a deeper understanding of the unique challenges and needs of the area. Additionally, officers in smaller jurisdictions may have more flexibility in their duties and responsibilities, allowing them to respond to a wider range of situations and provide more personalized services to their community members.
However, this model of policing also has its limitations, as smaller departments may have more limited resources and less specialized training compared to larger law enforcement agencies.
Learn more about closer relationships here:
https://brainly.com/question/31794604
#SPJ11
Suppose there is currently a $500 tax on automobiles that generates $5 million in revenue per year. If the tax increases to $800 per automobile, the revenue the tax generates will increase to $10 million. This tells us that, in this range of tax rates, the quantity effect _______ the price effect.
In this range of tax rates, the quantity effect is greater than the price effect.
The quantity effect refers to the impact of a change in price on the quantity demanded of a good or service. In this case, an increase in the tax on automobiles from $500 to $800 per automobile will lead to a decrease in the quantity demanded of automobiles. This is because the higher tax will make automobiles more expensive, which will lead some consumers to switch to alternative modes of transportation or postpone their purchase of a new car.
The price effect, on the other hand, refers to the impact of a change in price on the revenue generated by a tax. In this case, an increase in the tax on automobiles from $500 to $800 per automobile will lead to an increase in the revenue generated by the tax. This is because the higher tax will lead to a higher tax base (i.e., the total value of automobiles subject to the tax), which will offset the decrease in quantity demanded.
Therefore, in this range of tax rates, the quantity effect is greater than the price effect. This means that the decrease in quantity demanded resulting from the higher tax is larger than the increase in revenue generated by the tax.
Learn more about tax rates: https://brainly.com/question/30629449
#SPJ11
If a minor is served alcoholic beverages, who is legally responsible?
Answer:
it will always be the fault of the person who provides it
Explanation:
If a minor is served alcoholic beverages, then the person who is legally responsible is the seller or the bartender.
Who is a bartender?A person who is involved in formulating and serving alcoholic or soft drink beverages behind the bar, usually in a licensed establishment, is known as a bartender. It is the bartender who usually maintains the supplies and inventory for the bar.
On demand of the customers, a bartender generally mix classic cocktails such as a Cosmopolitan, Manhattan, Old Fashioned, and Mojito. It is the bartender who checks the IDs of customers before selling them alcoholic beverages.
Therefore, it's the bartender who is responsible for selling the alcoholic beverage to the minor.
Learn more about bartender from here:
https://brainly.com/question/1922923
#SPJ2
Which of the following is an ethical issue that affects the pharmaceutical industry?
making drugs portable for patients who need to travel to other healthcare professionals
finding ways to make sure patients take their drugs as advised
making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
supporting patients’ autonomy by supplying enough advertising about drugs
Answer:
The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
Explanation:
Trust me
Differentiate terrorism and activism
Answer:
its a good question.
if you look at wiki definition (well its not necessiailty a source of truth, but it refers largely wat a typical person thinks).....terrorism is defined as use of violence to achieve ones' political goal, which is not really different from activism.
i guess the easy answer is that terrorism is a violent act against the traditional social value; whereas activism is a fight, sometimes violent, against what the society considers as unjustice.
if you want a more thoughtful answer, you can add that sometimes one's definition of activism can be considered as terrorsim by a different person, because different ppl in the society have different social value and priority.
say if some self acclaimed activists run riot on the street, some ppl would consider them as activists; but if you are a store owner who dont agree with their view, their act is an act of terror.
Explanation:
Two constitutional amendments adopted in part because of wartime influences were the 18th, which dealt with _____, and the 19th, whose subject was _____.
prohibition; woman suffrage
The two constitutional amendments adopted in part because of wartime influences were the 18th amendment, which dealt with prohibition, and the 19th amendment, whose subject was woman suffrage.
The 18th amendment prohibited the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors, while the 19th amendment granted women the right to vote.
Both of these amendments were influenced by wartime events and attitudes, as the 18th amendment was passed in part due to concerns about the impact of alcohol on soldiers during World War I, and the 19th amendment was passed in part due to the contributions of women during the war.
To know more about constitutional amendments, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/699977#
#SPJ11
Think of the ways that Nationalist sentiment has an effect on life in contemporary America. Please look beyond the easy "Trumpism" stereotypes, and instead discuss what self-proclaimed nationalists believed before he ever came along. Why is this ideology so appealing to so many people?
Answer:
nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
Which is a reason ethics are important to law enforcement?
Answer:
Ethics is important because law enforcement is placed in a position of authority.
Explanation:
Time limit: 00:24:53
For workplace violence awareness, what does the acronym V.I.E.W. represent?
Visualization, Inspection, Enforcement, Willfulness
O Vigilance, Introspection, Engagement, Willingness
O
Variations, Inclination, Engagement, Worthwhileness
None of the Above.
For workplace violence awareness, Visualization, Inspection, Enforcement, Willfulness does the acronym V.I.E.W. represent.
Option A is correct.
What is the most significant factor in preventing violence in the workplace?A key factor in preventing workplace violence is effective communication. Instead of ignoring them in favor of returning to work, employees who have access to a communication network in the workplace may be able to better understand, recognize, and report the early signs of potential violence.
What is an important part of preventing violence in the workplace?The following are the fundamental components of an efficient program for the prevention of violence in the workplace: 1) The commitment of management and employee participation, 2) Analysis of the workplace, 3) Control and prevention of hazards, 4) Training on health and safety, and 5) Recordkeeping and program evaluation
Learn more about workplace violence:
brainly.com/question/26623065
#SPJ1
according to the dietary guidelines for americans, many people eat excess amounts of certain foods/nutrients, putting them at risk for disease. which of the following nutrients/foods are high in the diets of many americans? select all that apply.
Many Americans consume large amounts of alcohol, saturated fat, sugar, and calories in their diets.
What nutrients are recognized in the American Dietary Guidelines as being of concern?Calcium, potassium, dietary fiber, and vitamin D are believed to be nutritional concerns for the majority of Americans. Moreover, iron is a vitamin that poses a risk to the general public's health for those who are pregnant, nursing, or have young children, particularly those who ingest a lot of human milk.
What foodstuffs, as recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, should consumers avoid consuming?Consume a variety of nutrient-dense foods and beverages from within and between the major food groups while limiting your intake of saturated and trans fats, cholesterol, added sugars, salt, and alcohol.
Learn more about general public's health: https://brainly.com/question/14523834
#SPJ1
Why do you think death penalty should be illegal? (give me personal opinions) i just wanna see what most people think. You can say in the comments too :)
Answer:
We all want a cri- justice system that's sensible, effective, and creates a safe society with less cr*me
Explanation:
Answer:
i actually dont think that death penalty should be legal. unless the person killed BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of innocent people or did so many bad things that police and stuff even lost track,i think that anyone should go on death row. (or whatever its called). poeple that go to prison for years still have a chance at life. they have a chance to change and stuff.
i think that a . death penalty for ANYONE is too harsh
thats my opinion :)
No state in the US allows the Governor to directly select people to serve as judges. Group of answer choices true false
Answer:
false because they need a test to see if they can be the right judge
Explanation:
pls give brainliest
T/F The Supreme Court has ruled that the use of corporal punishment in schools (such as spanking) is a violation of the 14th and 8th Amendments.
the answer for this question is true
Larry lured Michael to an isolated area of town where he bound and blindfolded him. Larry then took Michael to a house and locked him in the basement. Which of the following is not true? Group of answer choices 1. Larry is guilty of kidnapping under the Model Penal Code only if he also held Michael for ransom. 2. Larry’s conduct demonstrates the mens rea of kidnapping. 3. Larry is guilty of false imprisonment. 4.Larry is guilty of kidnapping.
Larry is guilty of kidnapping under the Model Penal Code only if he also held Michael for ransom is the following option that is not true in the given scenario.
Larry lured Michael to an isolated area of town where he bound and blindfolded him. Larry then took Michael to a house and locked him in the basement. Thus, it is concluded that Larry is guilty of kidnapping and false imprisonment. The mens rea for kidnapping is present here as Larry deliberately lured and captured Michael. Hence, the correct option is 1. Larry is guilty of kidnapping under the Model Penal Code only if he also held Michael for ransom. kidnapping refers to an act of abducting a person by unlawful force or fraud or deception, typically to extract a ransom. False imprisonment refers to intentionally confining a person without legal authority or justification.
Learn more about Model Penal Code here:
https://brainly.com/question/31630505
#SPJ11
Why might it be difficult to prosecute a citizen who violates its laws outside its borders, when the offence is not illegal in the country he or she is visiting?
Answer:
Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think
Explanation:
What is a similarity between the majority leader and the minority leader of the House of Representatives?
A. They both determine the chairs of committees.
B. They both control what bills are voted on in the House.
C. They both have the power to filibuster bills they oppose.
D. They both serve as the head of legislators from their political party.
Answer:
D. They both serve as the head of political legislators from their political party
Explanation:
The claim (in law) that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case that it should be settled in the same way
The claim you are referring to is known as the legal concept of "precedent" or "stare decisis."
What is the precedent claim?Precedent is the principle that courts should follow the rulings of prior cases that are similar in legal issues and facts. It means that a court should apply the same legal principles and outcomes to similar cases in order to maintain consistency and predictability in the legal system.
When a party argues that a current case is sufficiently similar to a previous case and should be settled in the same way, they are relying on the principle of precedent.
Read mroe on precedent claim here https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
A DNS-based traffic load balancer
Azure load balancer
Traffic manager
Application gateway
Azure front door
A DNS-based traffic load balancer is a type of Azure load balancer that uses DNS to distribute traffic across multiple servers or endpoints. Thus option (A) is correct.
Azure Load Balancer is a Layer 4 load balancer that distributes incoming traffic across multiple VMs or instances in a backend pool. It supports both public and private IP addresses, and can be used for both inbound and outbound traffic.
When a client requests a connection to a particular hostname, the DNS servers return a list of IP addresses for that hostname, and the client selects one of the IP addresses to connect to.
Learn more about load balancer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30036917
#SPJ4
Your client conveys to you that he has received a court order, however, he is not satisfied with the outcome and indicates that he has heard that the judge knows the other party on a personal level as they are house friends. Advise your client regarding the possible options he has to address this situation and confirm the correct procedure to be followed.
Answer:
okay so took me some research but according to uscourts.gov i found a pdf that they had about court ruling and the "rules court judiciaries have to follow and according to Vol. 2/Part A:ethics and judicial conduct/codes of conduct chapter 2/canon 3 it states that "A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially and Diligently
hope this helps xx please give brainliest
What is the purpose of statutory laws? *
A)They give executive agencies their power
B)They limit the power of government
C)They allow state legislations to make laws
D) They protect the right of the people