The strategy was called closing the ring. Roosevelt and Churchill decided to start the war by attacking German positions in North Africa in December 1941. In October 1942, such manoeuvre was ultimately carried out.
How did the US military contribute to the victory in World War Two?America dispatched troops to the Pacific Islands, as well as to Italy, North Africa, and Western Europe. In addition to launching surface and submarine assaults against all of the Axis states, the United States launched two simultaneous bombing campaigns against Germany and Japan.
What strategy did the US use to beat Germany?The cornerstone of the grand strategy adopted by the United States and the United Kingdom during World War II was Europe first, sometimes known as Germany first. In accordance with this strategy, Nazi Germany in Europe would be first brought under control by the United States and the United Kingdom using the majority of their resources.
To know more about World War II, visit:
brainly.com/question/8605481
#SPJ4
• To what extent is it fair to make a defendant "pay” for the
mistakes his lawyer made?
the court will suspend, restrict, delay or revoke your driving privileges for one year if you are convicted of being a habitual truant from school.
'The court will suspend, restrict, delay or revoke your driving privileges for one year if you are convicted of being a habitual truant from school.
This statement is True.
Habitual behavior is defined as behavior that occurs automatically in the presence of a target. H. A direct goal-action connection, not preceded by a consciously developed intention.
The definition of addictive is by habit. An example of a habit used as an adjective is the phrase "habitual walk," meaning someone goes for a walk every day.
Habit learning is the process of creating systematic habits designed to facilitate learning. Instead of relying on the fallacy that you have to go to school to learn anything, learn through books, online courses, mentors, and most importantly experimentation.
Learn more about habitual https://brainly.com/question/27369710
#SPJ4
Juanita, a Texas resident (5th Circuit), is researching a tax question and finds a 5th Circuit case ruling that is favorable and a 9th Circuit case that is unfavorable. Which circuit case has more "authoritative weight" and why? How would your answer change if Juanita were a Kentucky resident (6th Circuit)?
To summarise, the circuit case that holds more authoritative weight for an individual is typically the one from their own circuit, as the rulings from that circuit are binding within it.
When determining which circuit case has more "authoritative weight," we need to consider the hierarchy of the federal court system. The circuits are organised into different regions, and each circuit has its own Court of Appeals.
In general, a case from the circuit in which a person resides holds more authority than a case from another circuit. This is because the ruling from the person's own circuit is binding within that circuit. So, if Juanita is a Texas resident (5th Circuit), the 5th Circuit case ruling would have more authoritative weight for her.
However, if Juanita were a Kentucky resident (6th Circuit), then the 6th Circuit case ruling would have more authoritative weight for her. The same principle applies here, where the ruling from the person's own circuit is binding within that circuit.
To know more about circuit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12608516
#SPJ11
a drawback in the use of patents to protect inventorsâ rights is that they
The change in technology and the time-consuming process are the biggest drawbacks involved in the use of patents to protect the rights of an inventor.
The patents may be taken into assumption as the intellectual property that are held by the inventor who creates them. Moreover, the patents are also granted only to those who create something which is unique and might not have any social interests involved. Thus, getting patents may become time-consuming, and even the technologies might change by the time patents are granted.
Learn more about patents here:
https://brainly.com/question/29638730
#SPJ4
al
cerial
3'
O
comply with the principle of legality?
Parliament enacts a law which provides that any person who
commits an act that could possibly harm good relations
between people is guilty of a crime and could be subject to a
fine of R1500.
Select one:
O A. The law does not comply with the principle of legality
since it conflicts with the ius certum rule.
O B. The law does not comply with the principle of legality
since it conflicts with the ius praevium rule.
O C. The law does not comply with the principle of legality
since it conflicts with the ius acceptum rule.
O D. The law does not comply with the principle of legality
since it conflicts with the ius strictum rule.
Marked out of 1.00
P Flag question
23°C Sunny
8
Finish
Answer:
Explanation:
A
unions have a legal obligation to provide assistance to members who are pursuing grievances under:True or False?
Answer:true
Explanation:as this should be the answer please give five stars and a thanks !
WHAT ARE THE FEATURES OF LEGITIMACY
Answer:legitimacy usually is understood as the popular acceptance and recognition by the public of the authority of a governing régime, whereby authority has political power through consent and mutual understandings, not coercion.
Explanation:
do you think that it would always follow hooke’s law, no matter how far you stretched it?
No, the spring would not always follow Hooke's law, no matter how far you stretched it. Hooke's law states that the force required to stretch or compress a spring is directly proportional to the distance it is stretched or compressed.
However, this law only applies within the elastic limit of the spring. Once the spring is stretched beyond its elastic limit, it will no longer follow Hooke's law and may become permanently deformed. Therefore, it is important to consider the elastic limit of a spring when applying Hooke's law.
For more similar questions on hooke's law:
brainly.com/question/30116694
#SPJ11
accounting equation
under most state statutes, the prosecutor needs to prove two things to get a hate crime conviction. which is not one of the two requirements?
The offender profited from the crime is not one of the requirement when the prosecutor needs to prove to get a hate crime conviction.
To secure a conviction for a hate crime under the majority of state statutes, the prosecutor must demonstrate two elements or requirements:
The victim's individual qualities led to the crime being committed.The criminal did the deed.The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) recommendations were used for the Hate Crimes Statistics Act reporting requirements. Because of this, it is now simple to determine the precise number of hate crimes that are committed.
Bias crimes are offenses that are motivated by hatred against a victim based on race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or national origin. Hate crimes have historically targeted people of color (POC) and members of particular religious sects.
Discover what the congress passed that amended the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include both physical and mental disabilities in September 1994: https://brainly.com/question/24930032
#SPJ4
1. looking at the way people do their work, what equipment or tools they use, and where improvements can be made to ensure safety
2. documenting all accidents or injuries to identify patterns
3. identifying safety and health issues in the workplace by conducting a thorough walk-through and inspecting every physical attribute
data analysis
risk mapping
job hazard analysis
The first step is to look at the way people do their work and identify what equipment or tools they use. This will help identify any potential hazards or risks associated with the work. The second step involves documenting all accidents or injuries to identify patterns. This will help identify areas where improvements can be made to prevent future accidents or injuries. The third step is to identify safety and health issues in the workplace by conducting a thorough walk-through and inspecting every physical attribute. This will help identify any potential hazards or risks associated with the workplace.
Once these steps have been completed, data analysis can be conducted to identify any patterns or trends that may be contributing to safety issues. This may involve risk mapping to identify areas where the risk of accidents or injuries is highest. Additionally, job hazard analysis can be conducted to identify specific tasks or activities that may be more hazardous than others. ensuring safety in the workplace involves a thorough and systematic approach that involves identifying potential hazards and risks, documenting accidents and injuries, and conducting data analysis to identify patterns and trends. By taking these steps, employers can create a safer and healthier workplace for their employees.
to know about hazard analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30641432
#SPJ11
30 Points: Taxation as a way of funding public services, like road construction, education, and security, is most directly supported by which ethical decision-making framework?
A.
virtue
B.
fairness and justice
C.
common good
D.
rights
Answer:
rights/D is what I think
Taxation as a way of funding public services, like road construction, education, and security, is most directly supported by fairness and justice.
What is a tax?A tax is a mandatory fee or financial charge levied by any government on an individual or an organization to collect revenue for public works providing the best facilities and infrastructure. The collected fund is then used to fund different public expenditure programs.
What is the purpose of taxation?The main purpose of taxation is to raise revenue for the services and income that supports the community's needs. Public revenues should be adequate for that purpose. Tax should, as far as possible, be levied equitably, according to the ability to pay.
Learn more about taxation here https://brainly.com/question/1775528
#SPJ2
antitrust law in _________ poses the possibility of criminal liability, but this is not possible in ______. a. the united states; european union b. the united states; china c. china; the united states
Antitrust law in the United States poses the possibility of criminal liability, but this is not possible in the European Union.
In the United States, antitrust laws are designed to promote fair competition and protect consumers from monopolistic practices. Under the Sherman Act, certain anticompetitive practices can lead to criminal charges, including imprisonment and hefty fines for both individuals and corporations involved. In contrast, the European Union follows a civil law approach to antitrust regulation, primarily through the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
While the EU's antitrust rules also aim to prevent monopolies and promote fair competition, they do not impose criminal sanctions for violations. Instead, the European Commission enforces these regulations by imposing administrative fines on companies found to be engaging in anticompetitive behavior. To summarize, antitrust laws in the United States can lead to criminal liability, whereas in the European Union, violators face only administrative penalties and no criminal charges. This distinction highlights the differences in the legal systems and approaches to antitrust enforcement between the two jurisdictions.
For more about Antitrust law:
https://brainly.com/question/32221632
#SPJ4
what does Acceptance mean?
Answer:
ac·cept·ance
noun
the action of consenting to receive or undertake something offered.
or
the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group.
What advantages does Andy obtain by using Instrumental methods of chemical analysis?
Andy Is a forensic technician analyzing the chemical makeup of a bloody glove found at the scene. He decides to use Instrumental
methods Instead of traditional chemical analysis testing. Instrumental methods are more
because they take out the
element of human error. They are also
which means that Andy can process large numbers of samples simultaneously
Answer:
Blank 1:Accurate
Blank 2:Automated
Explanation:Did the test and got 100%
Answer:
accurate and automated
Explanation:
1. what is the canada-china foreign investment promotion and protection agreement about? what are the main objectives of this treaty?
2. what is the canada-costa rica foreign investment promotion and _______.
Bilateral treaty promoting and protecting foreign investment between Canada and China, ensuring predictability, fair treatment, and dispute resolution are the main objectives of this treaty.
A bilateral agreement between Canada and China called the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) aims to encourage and safeguard foreign investment between the two nations. This treaty's main goals are to increase predictability and security for investors, ensure fairness and equity, ease the flow of capital, and create a process for resolving investment disputes.
A bilateral agreement called the Canada-Costa Rica Foreign Investment Promotion Agreement aims to encourage and facilitate foreign investment between Canada and Costa Rica. Its primary goals include fostering an environment that is conducive to investment, making sure that investments are protected and treated fairly, and setting up mechanisms for dispute resolution.
The agreement aims to promote economic cooperation, improve market access and give investors from both nations legal certainty and predictability. The provisions on non discrimination, expropriation compensation, and free fund transfers are among the rights and responsibilities of investors that are outlined in this document. The agreement aims to deepen economic ties and promote investment flows that benefit both Canada and Costa Rica.
Learn more about bilateral agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28214309
#SPJ4
which of the following benefits arise by having a civil trial before a criminal trial? a. defendant may make admissions during the civil trial that can be used in the criminal trial. b. in a civil trial, settlements may be negotiated at any time during the litigation. c. defendants in civil trials are considered innocent until proven guilty. d. civil trial precludes a person from being tried twice for the same crime.
What does it mean to measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy"?
To measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy" it is to compare the size of the deficit to the productivity . Thus, option A is correct. Therefore, option A is correct.
Every time the federal government's expenditure outweighs tax receipts and other sources of money, a budget deficit results. The US Treasury distributes treasury bills, written notes, and bonds to cover the shortfall.
The sum of the annual budget deficits of the United States of America, less the infrequent surpluses to occur is known as the national debt. It serves as a gauge for the total amount of funding the federal government will require.
Learn more about deficit, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29602763
#SPJ1
The question is incomplete, Complete question probably will be is:
What does it mean to measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy"?
to compare the size of the deficit to the productivity
to compare the size of the deficit to the unemployment rate
to measure the deficit as a percentage of the economy or GDP
to measure the deficit as a percentage of tax revenues
In the Clark-Wilson security model, what are the two levels of integrity?
A. Host and network
B. Integrity verification processes (IVPs) and transformation processes (TPs)
C. Ring and Low-Water-Mark
D. Constrained data items (CDIs) and unconstrained data items (UDIs)
The correct answer is D. Constrained data items (CDIs) and unconstrained data items (UDIs).
The Clark-Wilson security model is a framework for enforcing data integrity in information systems. It divides information into two types of data items: constrained data items (CDIs) and unconstrained data items (UDIs).
CDIs are data items that are subject to well-defined, static rules, and procedures, and are protected from unauthorized modification by a set of controls. These controls ensure that data is accessed, modified, and transmitted only by authorized users and in authorized ways.
UDIs, on the other hand, are data items that are not subject to such static rules and procedures. Instead, UDIs are processed by transformation procedures (TPs), which apply dynamic, context-dependent rules to ensure data integrity. TPs transform the data from one valid state to another valid state, according to a set of well-defined rules. By enforcing data integrity at the CDI and UDI levels, the Clark-Wilson security model provides a comprehensive framework for maintaining data integrity in information systems.
Learn more about Clark-Wilson :
https://brainly.com/question/30407289
#SPJ4
Which statement best explains how Kayla can identify her purpose for writing? The word “research” suggests that her main purpose is to learn about the Civil War. The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim. The word “present” suggests that her main purpose is to entertain with interesting facts. The word “cause” suggests that her main purpose is to inform and educate.
Answer:
the answer is B) The word “argument” suggests that her main purpose is to persuade, or present and defend a claim.
Explanation:
have a good day
Answer:
B
Explanation:
why does the constitution allow judges to play an activist role?
The reasons why the Constitution allows judges to play an activist role are :
1. Judicial Review
2. Evolving Interpretation
3. Counterbalancing Other Branches
1. Judicial Review: The Constitution grants the power of judicial review to the courts, as established by the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Judicial review allows judges to assess the constitutionality of laws and actions taken by the executive and legislative branches. This power enables judges to protect individual rights and ensure adherence to the principles enshrined in the Constitution. By engaging in judicial review, judges have the authority to strike down laws that violate constitutional rights or principles.
2. Evolving Interpretation: The Constitution is a living document, intentionally drafted with broad language to adapt to changing societal values and circumstances. It does not provide detailed instructions for every possible situation. This flexibility allows judges to interpret the Constitution's provisions in light of contemporary issues and evolving social norms. By engaging in an activist role, judges can apply constitutional principles to address novel challenges, protect individual rights, and ensure the Constitution remains relevant in a changing society.
3. Counterbalancing Other Branches: The framers of the Constitution envisioned an independent judiciary as a check on the other branches of government. By allowing judges to play an activist role, the Constitution provides a means for the judiciary to counterbalance potential abuses of power by the executive and legislative branches. Activist judges can scrutinize government actions, strike down unconstitutional laws, and protect individuals and minority rights from potential infringement by the majority.
However, it is important to note that the concept of judicial activism is subject to interpretation and can be a topic of debate. Critics argue that an overly activist judiciary may encroach upon the role of the legislative branch and undermine democratic processes. The extent of judicial activism is influenced by various factors, including the interpretive approach of individual judges and the prevailing legal and political climate.
Know more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/30792585
#SPJ8
when an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, he/she is __________ representing either party in future family-related cases.
a. prevented from
b. required to be
c. commited to
d. better at
When an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, he/she is prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases.
Divorce attorneys are prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases due to potential conflicts of interest. The lawyer, after representing one party, is no longer in a position to represent the other party impartially. This is to prevent any bias or conflict of interest that may affect the case's outcome negatively.A conflict of interest is a scenario where an attorney may not represent both parties in the same legal matter or similar legal matters, regardless of the type of case.
For instance, a lawyer representing a client in a divorce case cannot represent either of the former partners in a child custody case or any other family law case where there is a potential conflict of interest.In summary, if an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, they are prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases.
To know more about mediation click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30783013
#SPJ11
Create and Amendment should be designed to advance majoritarian democracy and add explanation why
Answer:
Because the amendments are created to bring about changes in federal laws.
Explanation:
The amendments cause changes in the constitution, which means that a law will be modified, where elements of its constitution will be added or removed, thus modifying various social, political or economic factors. Amendments are a very delicate process and they must be discussed a lot by the power they have, for this reason, the creation of a demand must have the capacity to explain itself and to promote a democratic process.
What does Wilson fear is happening in American communities?
He claimed to have exhausted all peaceful options and feared that during a war, Americans would abandon tolerance and freedom. Wilson expressed his continued concern that a military victory would eventually turn out to be hollow in language that echoed his remarks before the Senate.
American politician and professor Thomas Woodrow Wilson presided over the country as the 28th president from 1913 to 1921. Before winning the 1912 presidential election, Wilson, a Democrat, held the offices of governor of New Jersey and president of Princeton University.
Wilson served as the president of the United States during World War I and afterwards founded and was a key proponent of the League of Nations, for which he was given the 1919 Nobel Prize for Peace. The Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, granting women the right to vote, was passed and ratified during his second term.
To know more about Wilson here
https://brainly.com/question/4112868
#SPJ4
Test strips are most often used for _____.
Answer: to test the drug content in the blood
Explanation:Option C
What is the difference between public policy and private action? Provide one example of each as it relates to health care, education, or any other social issue.
Answer:
Public policies are primarily involuntary and compulsory actions while private actions are voluntary.
Explanation:
The difference between a public policy and private action is that public policies are primarily involuntary and compulsory actions while private actions are voluntary.
As we know public policies are made by the government, therefore, they are mandatory actions that every organization, individuals, firms, etc. should adhere to. On the other hand, private actions pertain only to those group of interested organization, individuals, firms, etc.
For example, when a public policy that establishes that every private enterprise must provide medical reimbursement to its employees, it becomes mandatory for all private enterprise to adhere to it.
However, in case of a private action, there are no such collective establishments/rules that every organization, individuals, firms, etc.must adhere. Every action undertaken by a private party are voluntary and only those interested follow them.
1. Where on a child's body would it be strange to find an injury not mentioned in the slides?
2. Who was Nixzmary Brown and what happened in her case (you may need to look her up on an external webpage)? What could have changed the outcome in this case?
3. Since neglect is the most common form of abuse, what are some of your ideas about prevention (list a minimum of two and explain the implementation)?
4. You are given a case to investigate. A 13-year-old child is addicted to drugs. The mother knows her child is doing drugs but does nothing about it. Is this a form of abuse? Explain your answer and include what type of abuse you conclude this falls under. If you determine that this is not an example of abuse, you must explain why you do not consider this abuse. What would you do in this case (as the investigator)? Explain why you answered the way you did.
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange.
2. To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect.
1. Without specific information from the slides, it is difficult to determine a specific location on a child's body where an injury would be considered strange. However, injuries to certain areas such as the genitals, breasts, or inner thighs would typically raise concerns about possible abuse or inappropriate behavior. These areas are considered particularly sensitive, and injuries in these locations may indicate potential harm or mistreatment.
2. Nixzmary Brown was a seven-year-old girl who was tragically killed by her parents in 2006. Her case garnered significant media attention and exposed failures within the child welfare system. Nixzmary suffered from severe physical abuse and neglect, and her parents subjected her to prolonged abuse, leading to her death. The case revealed various systemic failures, including missed opportunities by child welfare agencies and schools to intervene and protect Nixzmary from her abusive parents.
To change the outcome in this case, improved coordination and communication among the different agencies involved in child protection is crucial. Ensuring effective information sharing and collaboration between schools, child welfare agencies, law enforcement, and medical professionals would enable early detection and intervention in cases of child abuse. Additionally, enhancing training and awareness for professionals and the public regarding the signs of abuse and neglect can help identify and report cases more effectively.
3. Two ideas for preventing neglect as a form of child abuse are community support programs and parenting education initiatives. Community support programs can provide resources and assistance to families in need, such as access to affordable housing, job training, mental health services, and childcare options. By addressing the underlying issues that contribute to neglect, such programs can help alleviate stressors and provide support to parents, reducing the likelihood of neglectful behaviors.
Parenting education initiatives are also essential in preventing neglect. These programs can offer classes and workshops that teach parents about child development, positive discipline techniques, communication skills, and stress management. By equipping parents with knowledge and skills, they can better understand their child's needs and respond appropriately, reducing the risk of neglect.
4. Neglect can take various forms, including failure to provide necessary care and supervision. In the given case, the mother's knowledge of her child's drug addiction and her inaction to address it can be considered a form of neglect. By ignoring the situation and not seeking help or intervention, the mother is failing to provide the necessary care and support her child requires.
This type of neglect falls under the category of physical neglect as it involves the failure to ensure the child's physical well-being and safety. Substance abuse can have severe consequences on a child's health, development, and overall welfare. Neglecting to address drug addiction puts the child at significant risk and can lead to long-term harm.
As an investigator, it would be important to assess the situation further, gather evidence, and determine the extent of the child's drug addiction and the impact it has on their well-being. The next steps would involve involving appropriate authorities, such as child protective services or law enforcement, to ensure the child's safety and initiate appropriate interventions. The goal would be to provide support and resources to the child and the family to address the addiction and mitigate further harm to the child's well-being.
Know more about Drug addiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12039156
#SPJ8
What does substantive due process require? Choose 2 answer choices.
1. a legitimate governmental purpose if a non-fundamental right is involved
2. a compelling governmental interest if a fundamental right is involved
3. A state's attempt to regulate television and radio is preempted by federal law because the federal government has regulated the entire field.
Correct options regarding the requirements for a substantive due process are Option 1 ( a legitimate governmental purpose if a non-fundamental right is involved )and Option 2 (a compelling governmental interest if a fundamental right is involved).
Substantive due process is a legal principle that requires the government to justify its actions when they interfere with an individual's life, liberty, or property. It involves a balancing of individual rights and government interests, and it is applied differently depending on whether a fundamental or non-fundamental right is at stake.
1. When a non-fundamental right is involved, substantive due process requires that the government have a legitimate governmental purpose for its action. This means that the government must demonstrate that its action is rationally related to a legitimate government interest, such as public health, safety, or welfare. For example, if the government seeks to regulate a business practice that does not implicate a fundamental right, it must show that the regulation is reasonably related to a legitimate governmental interest.
2. When a fundamental right is involved, substantive due process requires that the government have a compelling governmental interest for its action. This means that the government must demonstrate that its action is necessary to achieve a compelling state interest, such as protecting the right to vote or the right to privacy. For example, if the government seeks to restrict an individual's right to free speech, it must show that the restriction is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest.
Regarding the third answer choice, preemption is a legal principle that applies when federal law conflicts with state law. If the federal government has already regulated a particular area or issue, then state attempts to regulate in the same area may be preempted by federal law. For example, if the federal government has already regulated the content of television and radio broadcasts, then states may not be able to pass laws that conflict with federal regulations in that area.
To know more about substantive due process,click here: https://brainly.com/question/30562013
#SPJ4
1. The case caption says that Helen Sollars (aka Helen Kelly) and the Estate of Helene Valoff are the plaintiffs in the case and that the City of Milwaukie is the Defendant. Why is the City of Milwaukie a party in the case? Why did the City of Milwaukie fail to appear (file any documents with) the Court of Appeals?
Answer:
I'm very low at mathematics
The City of Milwaukie is a party in the case because it is being sued by the plaintiffs, Helen Sollars (aka Helen Kelly) and the Estate of Helene Valoff.
It is named as the defendant because it is the party being accused of some wrongdoing.The City of Milwaukie failed to appear or file any documents with the Court of Appeals because it might have decided not to contest the lawsuit or decided not to pursue any further legal action regarding the case. This may be due to various reasons, such as a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs or an acknowledgment of the plaintiffs' claims. As a result, the Court of Appeals may have made a default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.
Learn more about plaintiffs here:
https://brainly.com/question/30714126
#SPJ2
Choosing a legal career is not easy, in addition to the possibilities, there is the weight of participating in one of the most important and influential careers in society. This means that those who chose this type of career have a lot of dedication to all the academic material that will be submitted, from the first year of study. In addition, it is necessary to think rationally, since this is a branch, where acting out of emotion and impulse is not stimulated, it is necessary to think, research and reason before making any choice. Lastly, it is necessary to always keep the focus, so as not to succumb to the needs that may arise halfway.
Question Completion:
What skills are required for a legal career?
Answer:
The skills required for a legal career are:
1. Dedication
2. Rational thinking
3. Ability to research
4. Focus
Explanation:
The above mentioned four skills are required of a legal practitioner, starting from the school days and throughout the practitioner's professional life. Without these skills, success cannot be attained. A legal practitioner must judge issues based on facts and reason, without employing emotions. Thinking rationally, employing reason instead of emotions in decisions, and carrying out in-depth research, the legal practitioner is set for career success.