What was the story of Oliver doing for Lyddie?
page 80 of lyddie book

Potsdam Conference

It happened one day after the bombing at Nagasaki

Answer:

A•  the Potsdam Conference

Explanation:

Japan accepts Potsdam's terms and agrees to an unconditional surrender. On August 10, 1945, just a day after the bombing of Nagasaki, Japan submits its acquiescence to the Potsdam Conference terms of unconditional surrender, as President Harry S. Truman orders a halt to atomic bombing.

source:

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/japan-accepts-potsdam-terms-agrees-to-unconditional-surrender

Answer: In Northumbria , there was fore warnings making people scared  there was intense lighting  and there was fiery dragons  flying in the sky ,and ,en destroyed the church of God

Explanation: just have to use climax and plot to help you

Answer:

The Northumbrian people faced terrible weather and attacks.

Explanation:

Answer:

Imperialism is when a nation has the desire to expand their economy, wealth, power, land, resources etc. by exerting control over other territories and people. An example of why it goes against nationalism would be Canada. If Canada were to go to war for imperialism and use the conscription law, it would go against its civic nationalism where many Canadians root for the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Explanation:

Goes against other types of nationalism such as cultural nationalism as well.

Answer:

Correct answer is B)  It was issued by Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt and it outlined  eight goals of the Allied war effort.

Explanation:

Option A is not correct as only Roosevelt and Franklin were the only ones presented, and the decision about second front was brought at Tehran Conference.

Option B is correct as the document, which was signed on August of 1941 proclaimed goals of these two countries after the war ends.

C is not correct as this was not planned by the Big three, although it led to creation of UN after the war.

D is not correct as this was not included in the charter itself.

Based on the speech, it appears that the author does believe that the Federal government is responsible for providing relief to Americans during the Great Depression. The author mentions several times that the government has a duty to help its citizens during times of crisis.

For example, the author states, "It is the duty of the government to provide for the general welfare of its citizens, and this duty extends to times of economic hardship." This statement suggests that the government has a responsibility to provide for its citizens during difficult times, including the Great Depression.
Additionally, the author discusses the government's role in creating policies to address the economic crisis. The author notes that the government has taken steps to help stimulate the economy, such as the New Deal programs. This suggests that the author believes the government should be actively involved in providing relief to Americans during the Great Depression.
Overall, based on the evidence in the text, it appears that the author believes the Federal government is responsible for providing relief to Americans during the Great Depression. The author suggests that the government has a duty to help its citizens during times of crisis and should be actively involved in creating policies to address the economic situation.

for more such question on Great Depression

https://brainly.com/question/20513444

#SPJ11

Answer:

On July 5, 1852, Douglass, a former slave, orator, and writer, delivered a speech during an Independence Day celebration held at Rochester New York’s Corinthian Hall. Now dubbed as Douglass’ most moving speech, the lecture, which boasted a nail biting critique — “This Fourth of July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn . . . Do you mean, citizens, to mock me, by asking me to speak to-day?” –, remains a sound assessment of “The Meaning of the Fourth of July for the Negro.”

“What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer; a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sound of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciation of tyrants brass fronted impudence; your shout of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanks-givings, with all your religious parade and solemnity, are to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy — a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of the United States, at this very hour,” Douglass said, putting “Mr. President, Friends and Fellow Citizens” in their place.

Explanation:

The factors that aided the process of industrialization in Great Britain included abundant natural resources, technological advancements, access to global markets, political stability, the enclosure movement, and capital accumulation.

In conclusion, the combination of abundant natural resources, technological advancements, access to global markets, political stability, the enclosure movement, and capital accumulation played instrumental roles in driving the process of industrialization in Great Britain.

For more questions on Great Britain:

https://brainly.com/question/30003550

#SPJ8

They pressured the US to take sides.

It could be argued that Great Britain and France placed the newly formed United States in the middle of their problems in the late 1700s by arguing over remaining territory, in the sense that the British blatantly ignored many aspects of the Treaty of Paris in terms of boundaries after the American Revolution ended.

Answer:

Today, the period in Europe from about the year 500 through approximately 1500 CE is called the Middle Ages, or the medieval era (the word medieval comes from the Latin medium aevum, literally middle age). But of course people who lived at that time did not think of themselves as being in the middle of anything—they, like we, referred to their own time as “modern.” A seventeenth-century German historian, Christoph Keller, first came up with the idea of dividing history into ancient, medieval, and “new period.”

The cultural phenomenon called the Renaissance began in Italy during the fourteenth century and spread throughout much of Europe by the end of the sixteenth century. It involved a flowering of art and scholarly and philosophical pursuits, often inspired by a renewed interest in the Classical cultures of ancient Greece and Rome. Some historians of the nineteenth century saw the Renaissance as a sharp break with the medieval “dark ages,” a sudden burst of intellectual light after the supposed gloom and stagnation of the Middle Ages.

The type of tariffs that the Europeans set up which allowed them to protect their own economies while taxing the goods from other countries were Protective Tariffs.

Tariffs that are implemented with the intention of safeguarding a domestic industry are referred to as protective tariffs. They want imports to be more expensive than domestically made equivalents so that domestic sales would increase and local industry will be supported.

Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry. Revenue tariffs are intended to raise money, not to limit imports.

For instance, protective tariffs are put on imported Japanese wheelbarrows to compel a price hike if a wheelbarrow built in Japan costs $50 in the US and a wheelbarrow created locally is likewise priced at the same level.

This is what the Europeans did as they began to industrialize. They also applied it to their colonies as well.

Find out more on tariffs at https://brainly.com/question/28942585

#SPJ1

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

makes more sense

Answer:

They were fed up with rising taxes and ebbing autonomy, and they wanted political equality.

Explanation:

According to the source, those who lived throughout this time were courageous, tenacious, and resolute.

The artwork depicts a scene of people coming to the streets and battling for their rights and freedoms, which suggests that the artist is in favor of the 1830's Bourbon-rebellion. By stressing the chaos and damage brought on by the revolution or by showing the people as violent and destructive, an artist from the opposing point of view might have depicted the scenario in a different way.

Peru experienced political and social unrest during the Bourbon Revolution, which lasted from 1879 until 1883. It was organised by a group of conservative Peruvians who aimed to reestablish the dominance of the nation's old elites and the Roman Catholic Church. The Revolution was ultimately successful, and it resulted in the creation of a new constitution that supported the traditional elites and restricted the power of the president. A period of political unrest that followed the Revolution finally resulted in a civil war in 1885. The Bourbon Revolution is seen as a significant turning point in Peruvian history since it helped the country become what it is today.

For more questions on Bourbon-rebellion click on

https://brainly.com/question/15009568

#SPJ4

The map most clearly illustrates the practice of option A. gerrymandering.

Gerrymandering is the manipulation of electoral districts or district boundaries to give an unfair advantage to a particular political party or group. The term comes from Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry's controversial drawing of state lines in 1812.

Gerrymandering can have a significant impact on the outcome of an election. It is often criticized as an undemocratic practice that undermines the principle of fair representation in government.

learn more about Gerrymandering: https://brainly.com/question/28553109

#SPJ1

Based on the information provided about the judicial nominee candidates, it is difficult to come to a consensus on whether they might engage in judicial activism or judicial restraint. Each candidate has their own unique set of beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends that may influence their approach to decision-making on the bench.

Honorable Jessica Jenulis appears to have a consistent moderate to conservative viewpoint, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, she has also ruled in favor of individual rights and against gerrymandering, which could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism when necessary.

Ana Maria Garcia, Esq. has no judicial experience, but her legal writings suggest that she may be inclined towards judicial restraint, as she appears to be in favor of letting states decide on issues such as gay marriage and abortion restrictions.

Honorable Marianne Olson seems to generally use stare decisis and respect precedents, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, she has also consistently ruled in favor of businesses over workers and has come under criticism for her refusal to prosecute cases of police brutality towards minorities, which could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism.

Honorable Dustin Burridge III has a strongly conservative ideology and a strict originalist interpretation of the Constitution, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, the Affordable Care Act, and his pro-business/anti-labor/anti-environmental rulings could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism.

Honorable Richard Kleinhaus also appears to have a conservative ideology and generally uses stare decisis and respects precedents, which may suggest a tendency towards judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, his pro-gun rights stance, and his pro-business/anti-environmental/anti-labor rulings could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism.

In conclusion, it is difficult to come to a consensus on whether the judicial nominee candidates might engage in judicial activism or judicial restraint, as each candidate has their own unique set of beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends that may influence their approach to decision-making on the bench.

#SPJ1

Similar Question: https://brainly.com/question/29663635

It is difficult to agree on whether the judicial nominee candidates might engage in judicial activism or restraint based on the information provided about them.

The way they make decisions on the bench may be influenced by the beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends of each candidate.

The fact that the Honorable Jessica Jenulis seems to consistently hold a moderate to conservative viewpoint may indicate a preference for judicial restraint. However, she has also ruled against gerrymandering and in favor of individual rights, suggesting a willingness to engage in judicial activism when necessary.

Attorney Ana Maria Garcia possesses no judicial experience, but her legal writings appear to favor allowing states to decide on issues like gay marriage and abortion restrictions, suggesting that she may favor judicial restraint.

The fact that Honorable Marianne Olson frequently appears to use stare decisis and to respect precedents may indicate a preference for judicial restraint. However, she has also been criticized for her refusal to prosecute cases of police brutality against minorities, which could indicate a willingness to engage in judicial activism. Additionally, she has consistently ruled in favor of businesses over workers.

The ideology and strict originalist interpretation of the Constitution held by Honorable Dustin Burridge III may point to a tendency toward judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, the Affordable Care Act, and his rulings in favor of business, labor, and the environment may suggest that he is open to judicial activism.

The fact that Honorable Richard Kleinhaus generally adheres to stare decisis and respects precedents, as well as his apparent conservatism, may point to a tendency toward judicial restraint. However, his opposition to gay marriage, support for gun rights, and pro-business, anti-environmental, and anti-labor rulings may suggest that he is open to judicial activism.

In conclusion, it is difficult to reach a consensus regarding whether the candidates for the position of judicial nominee might engage in judicial activism or judicial restraint because each candidate has their own distinct set of beliefs, experiences, and intellectual trends that may influence their approach to making decisions on the bench. As a result, it is difficult to reach a consensus regarding this issue.

Learn more about judicial nominee:

brainly.com/question/14035872

#SPJ1

Answer:

Neutrality is something where a person or nation stays neutral and treats all other nations as equals. They usually do not enter wars in order to not side with the opposing side and are generally friendly to both.

Answer:

Hampi was the capital of the Vijayanagara Empire.​

It was a village in south India, state of Karnataka

Answer:

The American Revolution had a massive impact on other nations around the world. One example is that Britian no longer occupied America. NOW GIVE ME BRAINLIEST ;)

Answer:

Explanation:

Sacrifices European Americans have made when they join people of color in fighting to end the unfair benefits/advantages to "whiteness", is pride, having to deal with more competition, and going against what they believed in.

Answer:

1.mahalaga

2.pagsibol

Explanation:

#CARRYONLEARNING

Answer:

C I think don't judge me

Explanation:

The closing of the frontier came because D. Fast and affordable travel across the continent encouraged western settlement.

The Frontier referred to the portion of the West that had not yet been properly settled by the Americans.

It was considered dangerous because:

The frontier was eventually closed when Americans were able to reach and settle in all areas of the United States because travel became cheaper and faster. For instance, the transcontinental railroad allowed people to get to the west in mere days.

In conclusion, better transportation enabled the settling of the west such that the frontier was closed.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/20194844.

Answer:

They believed that the slaves' labor would be rewarded in heaven

Explanation:

Answer:

The Black Lives Matter movement and protests

Explanation:

Just like then people of color are being mistreated and therefore people are now taking stands. Both then and now people taking a stand can end them up in jail for reasons that really aren't valid.

#BLM

Castles were built, a new Norman aristocracy was established, and the English clergy underwent some changes during his rule in England.

Origins. Under the supervision of William the Conqueror, Windsor Castle was constructed on a mountaintop overlooking the Thames and a Saxon hunting preserve. He began work on the Windsor castle in 1070, and it was completed 16 years later.

William built a considerable number of motte and bailey castles to help maintain the peace. William transferred Saxon nobles' rebellious territories to Norman knights and nobles in northern England and other countries. They agreed to defend William's rights in the area in return for building a motte and bailey.

Learn more about new Norman nobility: https://brainly.com/question/1161272

#SPJ1

In the 15th century, China and Europe experienced divergent fortunes due to various factors. China's centralized political system, advanced technology, and stable economy contributed to its prosperity, while Europe faced political fragmentation, technological limitations, and economic challenges.

China's fortunes in the 15th century were shaped by its centralized political system under the Ming Dynasty. The Ming rulers established a strong bureaucratic system that allowed for effective governance and stability. This stability, combined with China's advanced technology in areas such as agriculture, printing, and navigation, provided a solid foundation for economic growth and innovation. The Ming Dynasty also promoted trade and exploration, which further expanded China's influence and wealth.

On the other hand, Europe faced political fragmentation during the 15th century. The continent was divided into numerous competing states and kingdoms, which hindered cooperation and unity. This fragmentation limited the ability to implement centralized policies and hindered economic development. Additionally, Europe lagged behind China in terms of technological advancements. While China had made significant progress in areas such as agriculture and naval technology, Europe was still catching up. This technological gap impeded Europe's ability to compete globally and hindered its economic growth.

Furthermore, Europe faced economic challenges in the 15th century. The continent was recovering from the devastating effects of the Black Death, which had resulted in a significant decline in population and disrupted labor markets. Europe also faced limitations in resources and trade routes compared to China, which had access to lucrative trade networks in the Indian Ocean. These economic constraints further slowed Europe's progress and hindered its ability to match the economic growth and prosperity experienced by China.

In summary, China's centralized political system, advanced technology, and stable economy contributed to its fortunes in the 15th century, while Europe's political fragmentation, technological limitations, and economic challenges held it back. These factors played a significant role in shaping the different trajectories of China and Europe during this period

Learn more about political fragmentation here : brainly.com/question/29518146

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Answer is D I hope I help you

When Japanese American families were notified of their mandatory relocated to internment camps during World War II, One Week time were they given to dispose of their lands and other property .

Learn more about  Japanese Americans during world war2 brainly.com/question/12380584

#SPJ4

Answer:The anti-imperialists opposed forced expansion, believing that imperialism violated the fundamental principle that just republican government must derive from "consent of the governed." The League argued that such activity would necessitate the abandonment of American ideals of self-government and non-intervention

Explanation:

Answer:

we went to war with the Soviet Union

Explanation:

US, even though they hated the Soviets, never really went to war with them.