The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say that the major factor in spurring on Iran's development of nuclear weapons in the 1980s was the victory of the Revolutionary forces in Iran, that overthrew the Shah, the last one that ruled over Iran. So in 1981, after the civil war ended, Iran authorities decided to continue the development of nuclear weapons as a way to defend the sovereignty of the country. In that time, the Soviet Union decided to support Iran sending expert scientists to help Iran to develop its own research program.
What is a federal system of government?
Citizens have to obey the laws of the United States.
No laws are needed since there is a Constitution.
Citizens are able to make their own laws.
Citizens have to obey the laws of their states.
what was the relationship between martin luther king, the black panther party program, urban riots and brown v. the board of education? what are some of the similarities and differences between the four? what does an examination of the them reveal to us about the civil rights movement in the us? what were some of the similarities and differences between the civil rights, counterculture and women's rights movements?
Martin Luther King, Jr., Black Panther Party Program, Urban Riots, and Brown v. Board of Education were all civil rights movement pioneers against racism, inequalities, and discrimination against the African-American community in the US. The relationship between these four (4) movements is that they all impacted the foundation of USA's human rights laws.
However, you might ask, what are their similarities and differences?
1. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an African-American public speaker and religious leader who promoted progressive reforms through non-violent means and significantly affected the American civil rights movement.
2. Black Panther Party Program was a revolutionary political organization founded by African Americans that advocated violent resistance against white supremacists, those who physically assault African Americans, as well as against police brutality. They understood that the violence that was being encouraged by white Americans could not be solved by remaining silent and weak.
3. Anti-de facto segregation movements are referred to as "urban riots". Urban riots were studied by the Kerner Commission, which found that the main causes included calls for more public housing, the creation of jobs, and a renewed national responsibility to combating segregation against African Americans in the United States.
4. Brown v. Board of Education allowed blacks to attend public schools, which was a good thing for African Americans between 1900s and contributed to the civil rights movement. Thus, as a result of a 1954 Supreme Court decision, segregated education was outlawed.
What does a closer look at them tell us about the US civil rights movement?
We can tell that the US civil rights movement is a still a work in progress. We can tell that there are still similarities and differences between the civil rights, counterculture and women's rights movements in the United States of America. Civil rights to fight racism, counterculture to educate more Americans, and women's rights movements to not only solve the problem of racism but also of sexism are all still in progress.
Discover the most important similarity between the multiple civil rights movements and the African American civil rights movement: https://brainly.com/question/15728930
#SPJ4
Place the following key events of 1968 in chronological order:
- Johnson announces he is not seeking reelection.
- Martin Luther King Jr. is assassinated.
- Senator Robert Kennedy is assassinated.
- Riots erupt at the Democratic Nation Convention of 1968.
- Richard Nixon wins the presidency.
In 1968, the following key events took place in chronological order:
1. Martin Luther King Jr. is assassinated.
2. Riots erupt at the Democratic National Convention of 1968.
3. Senator Robert Kennedy is assassinated.
4. Johnson announces he is not seeking reelection.
5. Richard Nixon wins the presidency.
To know more about chronological order visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30560637
#SPJ11
In the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, popular sovereignty was proposed as a way to a) allow northern states the power to ban slavery b) deny southern states the legal right to own slaves c)allow settlers in new territories to vote on the issue of slavery d) overturn previous Supreme Court decisions on slavery
On May 30, 1854, it was made a law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act provided for popular sovereignty, abolished the Missouri Compromise, and established two additional territories. Hence option D is correct .
What was Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 ?A violent revolt known as "Bleeding Kansas" was partly a result of the pro- and anti-slavery advocates who flocked to the territories to influence the vote.
It gave the inhabitants of the states of Kansas and Nebraska the freedom to choose whether or not to tolerate slavery within their borders.
Following is a detailed explanation of the key components of both the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 and the Compromise of 1850.
The Compromise of 1850 was an agreement reached between the Southern and Northern states in 1850 that provided a temporary solution to the slavery issue.
A statute known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed in 1854.accepted popular sovereignty, implying that Kansas and Nebraska had the option of having slavery or not.
Learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 here
https://brainly.com/question/18278710
# SPJ 2
Poster mania, which peaked in the early 1970s, continued on university campuses in the u.s. because ________.
central to the colonists' position in the anglo-american debate over parliamentary powers was their
Central to the colonists' position in the Anglo-American debate over parliamentary powers was their belief that they should have representation in the British Parliament
The colonists believed that they were entitled to the same rights and privileges as British citizens living in Britain, including the right to have a say in the laws that affected them. However, since they were not represented in Parliament, they felt that they were being unfairly taxed and subject to laws that did not reflect their interests or needs. This led to increasing tensions between the colonists and the British government, which ultimately culminated in the American Revolution. The colonists' demand for representation in Parliament reflected their desire for greater political autonomy and their rejection of the idea that they were inferior or subordinate to their British counterparts.
To know more about parliament visit:
https://brainly.com/question/648357
#SPJ11
the articles of confederation question 17 options: provided for a bicameral legislature. established a strong executive branch. allowed the states to retain most of the power. created a way to raise taxes to fund an army. ended slavery.
The articles of confederation pose 17 alternatives: established a bicameral legislature created a powerful executive branch allowed the states to retain the majority of power devised a method for raising taxes to fund an army Slavery was abolished. So the correct option in the articles of confederation is C allowed states to retain their power.
Bicameral system
Bicameral system, commonly known as bicameralism, is a form of governance in which there are two houses of the legislature. The first examples of constitutional government can be found in 17th-century England, as well as in the late 18th century in both the United States and Europe. The English Parliament split into two chambers to acknowledge the difference between the aristocracy, clergy, and commoners. Because there were two interests to be represented—the mother country, through the governor in council, and the colonists themselves, through their chosen deputies—when the British colonies were created in America, the colonial assemblies were also bicameral. All states except Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Vermont adopted bicameral legislatures following the adoption of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. Single-chamber legislatures were first established in the three states, but in 1789, 1790, and 1830, respectively, they were replaced by bicameral legislatures. All of the following admitted new states had two-house legislatures at the time of their admission.
To learn more about Bicameral system
https://brainly.com/question/2771114
#SPJ4
.Abolitionists used the press to mock the nation's claim to be a "land of the free."
true or false?
It is true that Abolitionists used the press to mock the nation's claim to be a "land of the free."
Abolitionists in the United States used the press as a powerful tool to criticize and expose the contradiction between the nation's claim to be a "land of the free" and the existence of slavery. They used newspapers, pamphlets, and other forms of print media to disseminate their anti-slavery messages, share stories of enslaved individuals, and expose the injustices and hypocrisy of the institution of slavery. Through their writings, abolitionists sought to raise awareness, provoke public sentiment, and challenge the prevailing pro-slavery narratives of the time.
To know more about Abolitionists,
https://brainly.com/question/31751154
#SPJ11
Describe two challenges faced by gold miners in California?
Answer:
As the Eastern United States met the West in the months and years following the 1848 gold discovery at Sutter's Mill, California's shores and gold-filled hills became riddled with problems the eager prospectors might have thought they had left behind: racial tension, concern over rainfall, economic disparities between
Explanation:
Why might scientists need to use human cells in a lab?
Answer:
To see how a certain product (vaccine) will react with the cells, or how a virus reacts with it.
Explanation:
What was the main motivator for Napoleon to sell his land in North America?
Answer:
But France's ruler at the time, Napoleon Bonaparte, was losing interest in establishing a North American empire and needed funds to fight the British, so he directed his emissaries to offer not just New Orleans but all of the Louisiana Territory to the Americans.
Explanation:
The Treaty of Ghent:
1: returned all impressed American seamen to the United States
2: opened ports of the West Indies to United States trade
3: returned all national boundaries to their pre-war status
4: none of the above
The answer is: None of the above.
The Treaty of Ghent, signed on December 24, 1814, ended the War of 1812 between the United States and Great Britain. While the treaty did resolve several issues, none of the options listed accurately represent its provisions.
The first option states that the treaty returned all impressed American seamen to the United States. However, the Treaty of Ghent did not specifically address the issue of impressment. This practice, which involved the forced recruitment of American sailors into the British navy, was a major point of contention between the two countries leading up to the war. However, the treaty did not include any provisions regarding the return of impressed seamen.
The second option suggests that the treaty opened ports of the West Indies to United States trade. Again, this is incorrect. The Treaty of Ghent did not address trade issues or specifically mention the opening of West Indies ports to American trade.
The third option states that the treaty returned all national boundaries to their pre-war status. This is also inaccurate. The treaty did not alter any national boundaries or explicitly address territorial changes resulting from the war.
In summary, none of the options accurately reflect the provisions of the Treaty of Ghent. The treaty mainly focused on ending hostilities and restoring peaceful relations between the United States and Great Britain.
Learn more about The Treaty of Ghent.
brainly.com/question/2588373
#SPJ11
in response to the objection that there is a chance that innocent people will be executed, primoratz
Primoratz argues that if the death penalty were abolished, then criminals who deserve less severe punishment would be treated unfairly in response.
to the criticism that enforcing the death penalty inevitably results in the execution of some innocent people. According to the study, which was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, at least 4% of those who were or are currently on death row or are facing the death penalty are innocent people. He contends that while our legal system needs reforming, the death penalty should remain in place. Igor Primoratz's main justification for the death sentence in murder cases is that there is no punishment that may adequately innocent people deter crime. Igor Primoratz supports the retributivist viewpoint that a penalty is only appropriate if it grants a criminal his rightful rewards. What, therefore, do criminals get? According to Primoratz, thieves have to be stripped of the same value that they robbed their victims of.
Learn more about innocent people here:
brainly.com/question/17094986
#SPJ4
What was the most common way for Ockeghem and Busnoys to structure a mass?
a. with isorhythm
b. with a cantus firms
c. with mottos
d. with plainsong
The most common way for 15th century composers Johannes Ockeghem and Alexander Agricola (also known as Busnoys) to structure masses was through the use of isorhythmic motets.
The correct option is A.
This technique used a processional chant or cantus firmus to establish the melody and length of each phrase, regardless of the text of different sections of the compositon. Other elements used in isorhythmic motets included mottos, which were repeating patterns of short duration, and plainsong, which included various melodic patterns of longer duration.
Isorhythmic motets were divided into sections featuring changes in the rhythm, meter, and phrase length, and although each section might use different words and sing different musical lines, the mottos and cantus firmus elements remain constant, providing a structural foundation for the composition. Additionally, Ockeghem and Busnoys often used a cycle of melodic cadences to provide a unified close to individual sections.
To know more about motets, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32220443
#SPJ4
URGENT: China Decolonization:
Part 1: Why were people protesting in Tiananmen Square in April of 1989?
Part 2: How did the Chinese government respond to the protests?
The people protested in Tiananmen Square in 1989 for political reforms and the Chinese government responded with a violent crackdown.
Part 1: People were protesting in Tiananmen Square in April of 1989 primarily to demand political reforms, freedom of speech, and an end to corruption within the Chinese government. The protests initially began with students and intellectuals, but soon gained support from various segments of society, including workers, urban residents, and even some members of the Communist Party. The demonstrators sought greater democracy and transparency in the government, as well as an improvement in living conditions and economic opportunities.Part 2: The Chinese government responded to the protests in Tiananmen Square with a heavy-handed approach. Initially, the government attempted to quell the demonstrations through dialogue and negotiations. However, as the protests persisted and grew in size, the authorities declared martial law and deployed troops and armed forces to suppress the movement. On June 3-4, 1989, the government initiated a violent crackdown on the protesters, resulting in the loss of many lives and widespread arrests.The government's response to the protests was characterized by a combination of censorship, propaganda, and the use of force. They imposed strict media control to prevent information about the protests from spreading and implemented a propaganda campaign to discredit the demonstrators. The Chinese government's crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests marked a significant event in modern Chinese history, leaving a lasting impact on the country's political and social landscape.For more questions on Chinese
https://brainly.com/question/31815687
#SPJ8
What was a difference between the First Great Awakening and Second Great Awakening?
Answer:
¨ The Great Awakening came to an end sometime during the 1740s. In the 1790s, another religious revival, which became known as the Second Great Awakening, began in New England. This movement is typically regarded as less emotionally charged than the First Great Awakening ¨
Explanation:
Answer:
The Great Awakening came to an end sometime during the 1740s. In the 1790s, another religious revival, which became known as the Second Great Awakening, began in New England. This movement is typically regarded as less emotionally charged than the First Great Awakening
Explanation:
i hope that helped
Why did Germany decide to declare war on France in August of 1914?
A They wanted to eliminate the French threat and the possibility of a two front war.
B They knew Russia would only invest in the war for a year because of the Communist Revolution.
They wanted to bait Great Britain into fighting.
D They believed the U.S. would join the war on their side if they fought the French.
Which two countries were occupied following the end of ww2
Answer: Germany & Japan
Explanation:
Answer:
Two countries that were occupied following the end of World War II were Germany and Japan.
Explanation:
How did the Louisiana purchase affect Arkansas
Answer:
As Americans flowed into Arkansas, the Louisiana Purchase heralded the end of French and Spanish dominance.
in which city were 11 israeli athletes murdered during the 1972 olympic games
The 11 Israeli athletes were tragically murdered during the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich, Germany.
The event took place in the Olympic Village, where members of the Palestinian terrorist group Black September infiltrated the Israeli team's quarters on September 5, 1972. The terrorists took nine Israeli athletes hostage and later killed them during a failed rescue attempt by German authorities.
The incident, known as the Munich Massacre, shocked the world and highlighted the vulnerability of athletes and the need for improved security measures at international sporting events. It also had a profound impact on future Olympic Games, leading to significant changes in security protocols to ensure the safety of participants and spectators.
To learn more about olympics click here:
brainly.com/question/905533
#SPJ11
shortly after blank, president blank began a war with blank. this became known as blank
The options that are required to fill in this blanks are:
Battleship MainePresident McKinleySpainSpanish American warWhat was the Spanish American war?
This was the war that took place between the government of the United States and the government of the Spanish people.
The war was what led to the end of the Spanish rule in all of the Americas in the year 1898.
Read more on the Spanish American war here:
https://brainly.com/question/10443525
#SPJ1
The United States is a
constitutional republic.
direct democracy.
pure democracy.
parliamentary system.
Answer:
constitutional republic!!!
Explanation:
Got it right on edge :))
The United States is a constitutional republic. Hence, option A is appropriate.
What is the meaning of a Republic?Reps from the citizen body rule a state under the republican system of governance. Though who falls into the category of a people has changed over time, the idea that power belongs to the people is the foundation of modern republics.
India gained its independence on August 15, 1947, but on January 26, 1950, with the promulgation of the Constitution, it proclaimed itself to be a sovereign, democratic, and republic state.
Constitutional Republic, Parliamentary Republic, Presidential Republic, Federal Republic, and Theocratic Republic are the five different forms of republics.
San Marino claims to be the earliest constitutional republic and the oldest existent sovereign state. Marinus went on to create an independently governed monastic community atop Mount Titan in AD 301.
Hence, option A is correct.
Learn more about the Republic here:
https://brainly.com/question/12880388
#SPJ6
1. According to Bill Moyers, what is the indisputable fact that explains what led to the very public deaths of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and Tamir Rice? Why is it hard for most of us to understand these deaths?
2. What is white supremacy? What does the term ‘white’ mean in relation to white supremacy?
3. Nahisi says he is asking you to see yourself as an American with all of the freedoms you enjoy and how those freedoms are rooted in the horrible things our country has actively participated in during the past. What are these ‘things’ that Nehisi is talking about?
4. Who was Clyde Ross and how was he impacted by housing discrimination?
5. According to Nahisi, discuss what the issue is with how we talk about race.
Please answer all Questions
The indisputable fact that explains what led to the deaths of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and Tamir Rice is the belief that white people are superior race and thus racism.
What is white supremacy?The term white supremacy is known to be an erroneous belief that the white population is the superior race and they have to dominate the society.
Conclusively, Here, there is the removal or inhuman treatment to people of other racial and ethnic groups, such as the black people.
Learn more about racism from
https://brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
Help me please!! I will mark you as brainliest !!! Please please help! Finals !!
Military conscription means requiring men to join the military, explain by how this practice might
explain why leaders of WWI countries that followed this policy, were more willing and eager to
use force rather than diplomacy to solve disputes. *
Answer:
Leaders that used military conscription had unlimited military serviceman and could call upon a variety of different troops, thus could engage in a protracted war eliminating the need for diplomacy
one of the prevailing ideals found throughout the 1876 texas constitution is:
How did Huey Long deal with the issue of Standard Oil having an unfair monopoly? He asked the company for campaign donations. He defended the company in court. He raised the company's taxes. He forced the company to build schools.
Answer:
He raised the company’s taxes=c
Explanation:
Got it right edge 2020-2021
Answer:
C: He raised the company's taxes.
Explanation:
edge 2020-2021
Russia is still under the feudal system. Peasants are still serfs and not free to make their own choices. Will you side with the wealthy nobles or the downtrodden serfs?
Serfdom was abolished in 1861, but on terms that were not always favorable to peasants, which exacerbated revolutionary pressures.
What did the peasants do in Russia?Stalin forced Russian peasants to farm in collective farms known as Kalkhoz. The majority of land and farm implements were transferred to collective farms. The Kalkhoz profit was shared by peasants who worked on the land. Some peasants attempted to resist but were unsuccessful.
For centuries, Russians were subject to a feudal system in which peasants were born enslaved to nobility's great estates. Throughout the 16th century, Russian peasant farmers lived on land holdings, working the land for the owners while being given small plots to grow food for their own households.
Learn more about Russia here:
https://brainly.com/question/19251146
#SPJ1
In response to the U.S. Supreme Court's Obergefell decision we discussed as an example of the resolution of a circuit split, Justice Scalia wrote the following in his dissenting opinion (italics in original): "...This Court...consists of only nine men and women, all of them successful lawyers, who studied at Harvard or Yale Law Schools. Four of the nine are natives of New York City. Eight of them grew up in the east and west coast states. Only one hails from the vast expanse in-between. Not a single South-westerner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California does not count). Not a single evangelical Christian (a group that comprises about one quarter of Americans), of even a Protestant of any denomination. The strikingly unrepresentative character of the body voting on today's social upheaval would be irrelevant if they were functioning as judges, answering the legal question whether the American people had ever ratified a constitutional provision [on the question at issue]. But of course the Justices in today's majority are not voting on that basis; they say they are not. And to allow the policy question [at issue] to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation." Explain whether you agree or disagree with this restrictive view of federalism and the role of judges in our common law system.
Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion reflects a restrictive view of federalism and emphasizes the importance of representation in decision-making processes. He criticizes the composition of the Supreme Court, suggesting that the lack of diversity among the justices in terms of background, geography, and religious beliefs could undermine the legitimacy of their rulings, especially in cases involving social issues.
This perspective raises broader questions about the role of judges in interpreting the law and shaping social policy. Some may agree with Justice Scalia's view, arguing that judges should strictly adhere to a textual interpretation of the Constitution and defer to the democratic process to address social issues. They may believe that unelected judges should not be making decisions that have significant societal impact without a broader representation of perspectives.
On the other hand, proponents of a more expansive view of federalism and the judicial role argue that the Constitution is a living document, subject to interpretation and adaptation over time. They contend that judges have a duty to protect individual rights and liberties, even if it means interpreting the Constitution in ways that may not align with the specific intent of its framers. They emphasize the importance of an independent judiciary in safeguarding minority rights and preventing the tyranny of the majority.
The debate over the role of judges in the common law system and the boundaries of federalism is complex and multifaceted, with different perspectives and interpretations. It ultimately reflects differing views on the balance between democratic processes, the protection of individual rights, and the proper role of the judiciary in shaping societal values and norms.
To learn more about Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ11
In 3 to 5 sentences, explain why enslaving the indigenous peoples of the Americas was largely unsuccessful in filling the need of the plantations. Support your answer by using one piece of qualitative, and one piece of quantitative information from La casa‘s writing.
Answer:
In 3 to 5 sentences, explain why enslaving the indigenous peoples of the Americas was largely unsuccessful in filling the need of the plantations. Support your answer by using one piece of qualitative, and one piece of quantitative information from La casa‘s writing.
Explanation:
Enslaving the indigenous peoples of the Americas was largely unsuccessful in filling the need of the plantations due to several reasons. Qualitatively, Bartolome de las Casas observed that the native population was not well-suited to the harsh labor demanded by plantation work, and were not familiar with the types of crops being cultivated. Quantitatively, Las Casas estimated that the native population of Hispaniola declined from an estimated 3 million before the arrival of the Spanish to only 500 by 1542 due to the harsh working conditions and diseases brought by the Europeans. Therefore, enslaving indigenous peoples was not a sustainable solution for the labor needs of plantations, as it caused a significant decline in the native population and did not provide the efficient workforce that European colonizers sought.
If you can, give me brainliest please!
TUESDAY Activity 2 – I CONNECT Directions: After watching Florante and Laura and Ibong Adarna in Activity 1, write an essay about the influences of the Western Classical play or opera on Philippine theatrical performance in terms of form and content of story. Use the rubric below to assess your output Rubric for Essay Organization of Ideas 50% Sentence Structure, Grammar and Spelling 30% Originality 20% Total 100%
Essay: Influences of Western Classical Play and Opera on Philippine Theatrical Performance
The Western Classical play and opera have had a significant impact on Philippine theatrical performance, influencing both the form and content of storytelling. This essay explores the influences of Western Classical play and opera on Philippine theater, considering the organization of ideas, sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and originality.
In terms of the organization of ideas, the Western Classical play and opera have provided a framework for Philippine theatrical performances. The influence can be seen in the structure and progression of the storylines. Just like in Western Classical plays, Philippine theater often follows a three-act structure, with a clear exposition, rising action, climax, and resolution. This borrowed framework has helped Philippine theater productions maintain coherence and engage audiences effectively. The organization of ideas in Philippine theater reflects the influence of Western Classical play and opera, demonstrating an understanding of dramatic structure.
Sentence structure, grammar, and spelling are essential elements of effective communication in any form of writing, including essays. When discussing the influences of Western Classical play and opera on Philippine theatrical performance, it is crucial to maintain clarity and precision in writing. Proper sentence structure, accurate grammar usage, and correct spelling contribute to the readability and credibility of the essay. By demonstrating a strong command of language, the essay reflects the writer's understanding and attention to detail.
Originality is also a vital aspect of any essay, as it showcases the writer's unique perspective and insights. While discussing the influences of Western Classical play and opera on Philippine theater, the essay should present fresh ideas and perspectives. It is important to go beyond stating obvious connections and delve into specific examples that highlight the distinct contributions of Western Classical play and opera to Philippine theatrical performance. By offering original thoughts and analysis, the essay demonstrates critical thinking and a deeper understanding of the topic.
Overall, the essay should effectively analyze the influences of Western Classical play and opera on Philippine theatrical performance in terms of form and content. The organization of ideas should showcase a clear understanding of the borrowed structure and storytelling techniques. Sentence structure, grammar, and spelling should be precise and accurate, enhancing the clarity of the essay. Originality should shine through in the form of unique insights and examples that highlight the specific impacts of Western Classical play and opera on Philippine theater. By meeting these criteria, the essay will demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the topic and receive a high score on the provided rubric.
In conclusion, the influences of Western Classical play and opera on Philippine theatrical performance have shaped the form and content of storytelling in Philippine theater. The organization of ideas, sentence structure, grammar, spelling, and originality play crucial roles in assessing the quality of the essay discussing these influences. By effectively analyzing and presenting these influences, the essay showcases a comprehensive understanding of the topic and its impact on Philippine theater.