What was meant by the rise of the common man during the age of Jackson

A stock market crash would be considered an "important independent shock to an economy" according to Peter Temin.

In the statement by Peter Temin, he argues that if the crash of 1929 was a significant shock to the economy, then the crash of 1987 should have had similar disastrous effects.

This implies that he sees a stock market crash as an important independent shock to an economy. Therefore, option C, a stock market crash, would be considered an "important independent shock to an economy" based on Temin's argument.

In his book "Lessons from the Great Depression," economist Peter Temin of MIT suggests that the crash of 1929, which marked the beginning of the Great Depression, was a crucial independent shock to the economy. He argues that if this crash had such disastrous effects, then the crash of 1987 should have also had a similar impact. Based on Temin's argument, a stock market crash can be considered an important independent shock to an economy.

To know more about Economist ,visit:

brainly.com/question/28556553

#SPJ11

Answer:

Zeus

Explanation:

Thunder and lightning play a large role in Greek mythology, with the god of the sky, Zeus, able to harness the elements' power to use as a weapon. He was the ruler of all the Olympian gods and the god of lightning, thunder, law, order, and justice.

If you find this answers your question please give a branliest

Answer: Zeus  

Explanation: Is the god of lightning.

Studying God's Word offers three advantages: solace and hope, joy and blessings, and life guidance.

It is modelled after Jesus' example:

Guides us wisely:

It offers the required inspiration:

To know more about the God's Word, here

https://brainly.com/question/5017510

#SPJ1

Answer:

the way that the Enlightenment's theories of government viewed the role of government was that government was meant to serve the people, not the other way around. Explanation: The Enlightenment, or Age of Enlightenment, prepared politics and government in earth-shaking ideas.

Yes, the Holy Spirit can speak apart from Scripture. While Scripture is the primary means through which the Holy Spirit communicates, it is not the only way. The Holy Spirit can also speak to individuals through various other means, such as through personal experiences, the words of others, and even through our conscience.

In the Bible, the Holy Spirit is described as a guiding and comforting presence, helping believers to discern the will of God and follow the right path. The Holy Spirit can prompt individuals to take specific actions, make certain decisions, or gain insights that may not be directly related to a specific Bible passage.

However, it is essential for believers to test the validity of any message or guidance they believe to be from the Holy Spirit against the teachings of Scripture. The Bible serves as a foundational source of truth and provides a benchmark for discerning whether or not a message aligns with the will of God. It is also important to consider the context and circumstances surrounding any perceived guidance from the Holy Spirit, as well as seeking the counsel of trusted spiritual advisors.

In summary, while the Holy Spirit can and does speak apart from Scripture, it is crucial for believers to carefully evaluate any perceived guidance in light of the teachings of the Bible and seek confirmation from others in their faith community.

Learn more about Scripture here :-

https://brainly.com/question/30066148

#SPJ11

Answer: discrimination by state officials in voter registration on the basis of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Theyrestrict the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and other terrorist organizations from harassing and torturing African Americans.

Following their successful attack on Washington D.C. in 1814, British forces proceeded toward Baltimore but were unsuccessful in capturing a key fort there.

British forces, after their victorious assault on Washington D.C. during the War of 1812, directed their attention towards Baltimore. However, their attempt to seize a crucial fort in Baltimore proved unsuccessful.

The British forces, led by Major General Robert Ross and Vice Admiral Alexander Cochrane, launched an offensive in August 1814 as part of their larger campaign in the Chesapeake Bay region.

They intended to capture Fort McHenry, a strategic fortification guarding the entrance to Baltimore's harbor. The fort was defended by American troops under the command of Major George Armistead.

Despite a relentless bombardment, the British navy's attempts to conquer Fort McHenry were thwarted.

The valiant defense and resilience of the American troops, as well as the sight of the American flag still flying proudly over the fort, inspired Francis Scott Key to pen the poem that would later become the United States' national anthem, "The Star-Spangled Banner."

Learn more about Baltimore here:

https://brainly.com/question/13569320

#SPJ11

Answer:

1,3,4

Explanation:

i just did it

Answer:

increased

Explanation:

industrial revolution fueled labor demands

Answer:

When Thomas Jefferson took office on March 4, he ordered that the four remaining commissions be withheld. Marbury sued the new secretary of state, James Madison, in order to obtain his commission.

Court: Supreme Court of the United States

Explanation:

Answer:

C)by showing that when blood lineage failed, chaos and war followed

Explanation:

The War of Spanish Succession illustrates the importance of blood lineage to the system of absolute monarchs in Europe "by showing that when blood lineage failed, chaos and war followed."

This is evident when following the death of Charles II, King of Spain, without having any children or apparent heir in 1700. However, he formally let Louis XIV's grandson, Philip, a Bourbon to become the King of Spain. This upset the power balance, and a great fight ensued especially from the family of Habsburg. The war was so great it reached America, West Indies, and the Indian subcontinent.

The war finally ended after the treaty of Utrecht was made in 1713

Answer:

Washington also set precedents for the social life of the president. Troubled by how the presidents of the Confederation Congress had been overwhelmed by visitors, Washington spent his days doing the business of government and set aside the late afternoon for meetings with the public and evenings for dinner parties with invited guests. These practices are still followed by White House protocol.

Mexicans immigrants that entered the US from the south "immigrated because they wanted to escape poverty and civil unrest".

Thus the correct option is D.

To learn more about Mexicans immigrants, refer: https://brainly.com/question/24285693

#SPJ1

Answer:

Yes your correct answer my girl is

D)

immigrated because they wanted to escape poverty and civil unrest.

Explanation:

Hope this helped you.Have a great day/week.

Answer:

The majority of slaves, however, were brought to the Cape in small groups, or as individuals, aboard ships returning to Europe from the VOC trading posts in South and Southeast Asia. They were usually owned by ships' officers or passengers who obtained them in Asia and then sold them at profit at the Cape.

Answer:

Article Summary:

According to an article published by Reuters in December 2021, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that executing prisoners with severe dementia or mental illness is unconstitutional. The article presents evidence showing that the court's decision is based on the idea that executing individuals with severe dementia or mental illness violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The article also highlights how some U.S. states, including Texas and Alabama, continue to execute prisoners with severe mental illnesses. This article is significant in that it highlights the ongoing debate surrounding capital punishment and the ethical implications of executing individuals with mental illnesses.

Link to the article: https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-supreme-court-bars-executions-prisoners-severe-dementia-2021-12-06/

Compare/Contrast:

The information presented in the article aligns with the Ethics textbook chapter's argument that capital punishment is ethically problematic due to the possibility of executing innocent people, racial and economic bias, and mental health issues. The Ethics textbook chapter further argues that the death penalty is often a form of institutionalized violence that targets marginalized communities. The article highlights how the Supreme Court's decision to prohibit the execution of individuals with severe mental illnesses is a step towards reducing the ethical concerns surrounding the death penalty. However, the article also shows how some U.S. states continue to execute prisoners with mental illnesses, indicating that much work still needs to be done to address the ethical issues surrounding capital punishment.

Reaction:

The article is both surprising and encouraging. It is encouraging to see that the Supreme Court recognizes the ethical implications of executing individuals with severe mental illnesses and that they have taken a step towards prohibiting such executions. However, it is concerning to see that some U.S. states continue to execute prisoners with mental illnesses, despite the ethical implications. This article highlights the need for continued debate and activism surrounding the death penalty, particularly in relation to the ethical concerns it raises. It is vital that we continue to work towards a more just and equitable criminal justice system that ensures that all individuals are treated with dignity and respect.

After assuming command of the Army of the Potomac, General George McClellan made the mistake of being overly cautious and delaying his attacks on Confederate forces.

McClellan was known for his meticulous planning and emphasis on training and organization, but he was also criticized for being indecisive and overly concerned with the size of his opponent's forces.

One of McClellan's most significant mistakes was his failure to take advantage of opportunities to strike at Confederate General Robert E. Lee's army during the Seven Days Battles in 1862.

Despite outnumbering Lee's forces and possessing superior artillery, McClellan hesitated to attack and instead retreated back to the safety of his supply base at Harrison's Landing.

Another mistake McClellan made was his reliance on telegraphed intelligence reports rather than direct reconnaissance of enemy positions. This led to him overestimating the strength of Confederate forces and being hesitant to engage them in battle.

Overall, McClellan's caution and indecisiveness prolonged the war and contributed to significant losses for Union forces. His failure to aggressively pursue and defeat Confederate forces allowed the Confederacy to maintain their hold on key territories and prolong the conflict.

To know more about General George McClellan, refer to the link :

https://brainly.com/question/7603626#

#SPJ11

Answer:

heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy can we be friends

Answer:

it was either Ferdinand Magellan or Christopher Columbus but, I believe it is Ferdinand Magellan.

pls give me brainliest . <3

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

why?because the Philippines Presedent and the Presedent of America are Indeed friends.....

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

everyone can have their own beliefs

Answerno

Explanation:if you was gay or lgbtq god wouldn't let you in heaven till you changed

Answer: C

Explanation:

Achieving Equality for African Americans

Answer:

C: achieving equality for African Americans

Explanation:

edg2020

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

it is right

Answer: A i think i do not know

Explanation:

Britain agreed to stop fighting the war of 1812 because of overwhelming pressure from its citizens, the deteriorating economy, and the lack of support from its allies.

After four years of bloody and costly battles, the British government was forced to come to terms with the United States in the Treaty of Ghent.

The treaty, which was signed on December 24, 1814, put an end to the hostilities between the two nations and restored the pre-war borders.

The war of 1812 was a major victory for the United States and an important lesson in international diplomacy.

In 1812, Britain agreed to an armistice and cease hostilities with the United States, bringing an end to the War of 1812.

This was due to a number of factors, including a shift in public opinion in Britain, a desire to focus on the war against Napoleon, and the strength of the American forces.

To learn more about war, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3445478

#SPJ4

Answer:

Under prime ministers Henry Campbell-Bannerman (1905–1908) and H. H. Asquith (1908–1916), the Liberal Party passed the welfare reforms that created a basic British welfare state. Although Asquith was the party's leader, its dominant figure was David Lloyd George.

Explanation:

Bowers v. Hardwick was a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1986.

The case concerned the legality of a Georgia legislation that made it illegal for people of the same sex, even in the privacy of their own homes. At the time and still today, the case is divisive.

The case started when gay man Michael Hardwick was detained for consensual sodomizing with another man in his own bedroom. Hardwick argued that the Georgia legislation was unconstitutional because it infringed on his right to privacy under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The matter eventually made it to the US Supreme Court.

To know more about Hardwick click here

brainly.com/question/29847825

#SPJ4

Answer:

According to the Virginia Plan, states with a large population would have more representatives than smaller states. Large states supported this plan, while smaller states generally opposed it. Under the New Jersey Plan, the unicameral legislature with one vote per state was inherited from the Articles of Confederation.

Explanation:

The Anti-Federalists feared that the adoption of constitution would lead to a powerful and corrupt national government, attacks on property rights, and popular tyranny.

The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution primarily because they believed it would establish a strong and centralized national government. They feared that this concentration of power would result in corruption and a loss of individual liberties. The Anti-Federalists argued that a distant and powerful government would be less responsive to the needs and concerns of the people, leading to potential abuses of power.

Additionally, the Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential attacks on property rights. They believed that a strong national government could impose excessive taxation, interfere with landownership, and undermine the economic interests of individuals. The Anti-Federalists valued the protection of private property as a fundamental right and saw it as essential for individual freedom and economic prosperity.

Furthermore, the Anti-Federalists worried about the possibility of popular tyranny under the Constitution. They believed that a strong central government could ignore the will of the people and impose its own agenda, potentially leading to the suppression of minority rights and the concentration of power in the hands of a few. The Anti-Federalists argued for stronger state governments as a safeguard against potential tyranny at the federal level.

It is important to note that while the Anti-Federalists expressed concerns about the potential abuses of power, they did not specifically focus on the issue of slavery in their opposition to the Constitution. Slavery was a divisive issue during the Constitutional Convention, but the Anti-Federalists' primary concerns centered around the structure and powers of the proposed national government.

To know more about Tyranny click here:

brainly.com/question/8430146

#SPJ11

Answer:

The injustices of communism were not limited to mass murder alone. Even those fortunate enough to survive still were subjected to severe repression, including violations of freedom, of speech, freedom of religion, loss of property rights, and the criminalisation of ordinary economic activity.

The classification of each statement as reflecting the point of view of a labor union or the management are as follows:

In the 1800s, the labor union was an association of labor who worked in favor and mostly promoted the interest of their members.

In the 1800s, the management of a company were the owners of the factory which most labor worked for before the 20th century.

Missing words "Workers should have some say in their working conditions, Unskilled workers should not expect to receive high wages, The cost of replacing experienced workers is higher than the cost of raising wages."

Read more about labor union

brainly.com/question/881501

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer

Explanation:

This link is what I found

https://www.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/did-african-american-slaves-rebel/