One primary reason that it took so long to create a stable government in South America was the numerous colonial occupations that caused political fragmentation and lack of unity among the South American nations. The Spanish and the Portuguese were the first to colonize South America, with the Spanish settling in the western and central parts of the continent and the Portuguese in Brazil.
Although South American nations gained independence from European powers in the early 19th century, their progress towards establishing stable governments was slow due to factors such as political fragmentation, economic underdevelopment, weak infrastructure, and social inequalities. Most of the South American nations were divided into various political factions that competed for power, leading to coups, civil wars, and political instability. The lack of unity and cohesion among South American nations further complicated efforts to establish stable governments, and it wasn't until the mid-20th century that several nations achieved political stability.
For instance, Argentina established a stable democracy in 1983 after years of political turmoil, while Brazil and Chile achieved similar political stability in the 1980s and 1990s. Today, most South American nations are stable democracies with varying degrees of economic development, but political stability remains a challenge in some countries.
To know more about democracy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30078994
#SPJ11
In what language, and in what year, was this cartoon created?
Answer:
Fantasmagorie is considered to be the oldest cartoon in the world. The very short animation is one of the earliest examples of traditional (hand-drawn) animation. It was created in 1908 by French cartoonist Émile Cohl. :)
Answer:
It was created in 1908 in France
Which nation did Richard Nixon normalize diplomatic relations with in 1972 as a way to end US involvement in Vietnam?
Answer:
China is the answer
PLEASE HELP I'LL ALSO GIVE BRAINLY!!!! I REALLY NEED SOMEONE TO HELP WITH THIS! PLEASE
Explanation:
When Herbert Hoover became the U.S. president in 1929, the United States was
enjoying great economic prosperity. However, within eight months of Hoover
taking office, the stock market crashed, signaling the economic crisis called the
Great Depression.
A Hands-Off Approach
Like his immediate predecessors, Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge, the
Republican businessman Herbert Hoover believed in a laissez-faire, or hands-off,
approach to economic policy. Hoover feared that providing direct aid to people
in need would cause them to lose their incentive to work hard toward financial
success. Because of this, Hoover did not think the federal government should
give financial aid to the unemployed. Although President Hoover favored a
hands-off approach, he realized that he could not simply stand by and do
nothing as the economic system worsened. Shortly after the stock-market crash,
Hoover began to take action.
Promoting Sound Business Practices
Hoover was a multimillionaire who made his fortune through business ventures.
He believed that following sound business practices would pull the country out of
the Depression. On November 21, 1929, President Hoover met with business
owners, industry giants, and farm leaders to discuss a plan for recovering from
the stock-market crash. Hoover convinced these leaders to keep wages stable
and end any ongoing strikes and demands from unions. Many companies agreed
to cooperate. For example, Henry Ford raised factory workers’ wages from $6 to
$7 per day. Despite the cooperation of industrialists and farm leaders, Hoover’s
plan did not go far enough to restore the economy. In fact, the economy
continued to get worse as unemployment soared. The efforts of industrialists and
union leaders were a temporary bandage. They did little to fix the fundamental
problems of the U.S. economy, such as unstable banks and the lack of
stock-market regulation. As a result, in spite of industry’s initial cooperation,
wage cuts came, especially for unskilled workers,
Hope it may help you
how did increased Global interactions influence the political development of South Asian and East Asian States?
Answer:
Explanation: In the context of the global circulation of goods, there was in european.
How did British ,Dutch Spanish ,French claim other countries
Pls I desperately need this answered
Answer: They colonized them using military force and sometimes even intimidation.
Explanation:
Answer:
Colonization
Explanation:
sinabihan ko na masabi na kaibigan ko alam mo yung nakita na lang nilagay sa palikuran ng paaralan ano ang angkop na kilos?
Answer:
pag sasabihan ko sila
Explanation:
pag sasabihan
who ended radical reconstruction
Answer:
three states (South Carolina, Louisiana, and Florida)
Explanation:
In 1877, as part of a congressional bargain to elect a Republican as president following the disputed 1876 presidential election, federal troops were withdrawn from the three states (South Carolina, Louisiana, and Florida) where they remained. This marked the end of Reconstruction.
please give me the brainliest
PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Answer:
protecting natural resources
what were the sources of the oil spills that occurred as a result of the gulf war? (mark all that apply.)
some oil spilled from a refinery that was damaged were the sources of the oil spills that occurred as a result of the gulf war.
What is refinery ?A refinery is a manufacturing facility that sources of a series of chemical process units and unit operations that refine a particular material or convert raw materials into valuable products.Whenever an unwanted portion needs to be removed from a material in order to make it a usable product, the material must be purified - clarified or treated. This is done in a facility called a refinery. For example, sugar mills transform sugar cane and beets into the familiar white refined sugar crystals.There are his four types of refineries: topping, hydro-skimming, conversion, and deep conversion refineries. Depending on the market the refinery targets, each refinery has its own design to ensure that its production meets the host country's established standards.To learn more about refinery from the given link :
https://brainly.com/question/21529546
#SPJ4
The Boston Massacre 1770
1. List all acts passed against the Colonists by 1770
2. What had been taking place in Boston since 1764?
-What was the purpose of this invasion?
- What affects did this cause between Colonists and the Red Coats?
3. How did the entire event begin? Who do you think was in the right? Explain your thoughts?
4. How did this interaction between the Red Coat and the Colonist lead to the problem becoming a bigger more violent one?
5. How were the Colonists showing the RedCoats their hatred of them?
6. What was the reaction of the RedCoats towards these Colonists?
7. What happened to the RedCoats after the Massacre? Do you think this was a fair outcome? Explain why or why not.
The Sugar Act of 1764, Stamp Act of 1765, and Townshend Acts of 1767 were enacted against Colonists by 1770.
This legislation and other British initiatives to strengthen its control over the Colonies have increased tension and unrest in Boston since 1764.On the evening of March 5, 1770, a number of Colonists gathered behind a Boston guardhouse and taunted and threw items at a group of British troops, starting the Boston Massacre.Due to their mutual hostility, the Red Coats and Colonists' fight evolved into a more violent conflict.The Colonists protested and boycotted British products and verbally and physically assaulted Red Coats.Red Coats regularly attacked Colonists.After the Boston Massacre, seven Red Coats were tried for murder. Two were branded for manslaughter. The trial resulted in Colonies disturbance.What is The Boston Massacre of 1770?Generally, Some acts passed against the Colonists by 1770 included the Sugar Act of 1764, the Stamp Act of 1765, and the Townshend Acts of 1767. These acts imposed taxes and tariffs on various goods and required the use of specially stamped paper for legal documents, newspapers, and other printed materials.
Since 1764, there had been increasing tension and unrest in Boston due to these acts and other measures taken by the British government to assert its authority over the Colonies. The purpose of these measures was to increase revenues and assert greater control over the Colonies. This caused resentment and anger among many Colonists, who saw these actions as a violation of their rights and freedoms.
The event known as the Boston Massacre began on the evening of March 5, 1770, when a group of Colonists gathered around a guardhouse in Boston and began taunting and throwing objects at a group of British soldiers. The soldiers eventually fired into the crowd, killing five Colonists and wounding several others.
The altercation between the Red Coats and the Colonists escalated into a bigger and more violent problem because of the high level of tension and animosity between the two groups. The Colonists saw the Red Coats as symbols of British oppression, while the Red Coats saw the Colonists as rebellious and unruly.
The Colonists showed their hatred of the Red Coats in a number of ways, including through protests and boycotts of British goods, and through verbal and physical confrontations with the soldiers.
The reaction of the Red Coats toward the Colonists was often hostile and aggressive. They saw the Colonists as a threat to their authority and were prepared to use force to maintain order.
After the Boston Massacre, several of the Red Coats were charged with murder and put on trial. Two of them were eventually found guilty of manslaughter and were punished by having their thumbs branded. The outcome of the trial was controversial and sparked further unrest in the Colonies. It is a matter of debate whether the outcome was fair or not. Some people believe that the Red Coats were acting in self-defense and were unfairly punished, while others believe that they were justified in their actions and should have been punished more severely.
Read more about The Boston Massacre 1770
https://brainly.com/question/13436897
#SPJ1
How was the information passed down to each generation if they were not written down? In the Veda's (Indian Civlization)
Answer: hmmm i have not learned this yet hold on....................................... sorry cant answer this one to hard
Explanation:
to hard
What did SPQR mean in Latin?
Answer:
Senatus PopulusQue Romanus
translation: senate and people of Rome
List the three key milestones that would sharpen Sunni-Shia divisions by the end of the 20th century:
By the end of the 20th century, there were several key milestones that further sharpened the divisions between Sunni and Shia Muslims. Three of these milestones are the Iranian Revolution of 1979, the Soviet-Afghan war, and the Gulf War.
1. The Iranian Revolution of 1979: The Iranian Revolution led to the establishment of an Islamic Republic in Iran, with Shia Islam as its official state religion. This event significantly increased the influence of Shia Islam and Iran's role as a leading Shia power. It also created tensions with Sunni-majority countries, as Iran sought to export its revolutionary ideology.
2. The Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989): During the Soviet-Afghan War, which saw the Soviet Union invade Afghanistan, Sunni Muslims from various countries, including Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and other Arab states, came together to support the Afghan resistance against the Soviet forces. This conflict highlighted sectarian divisions, as Sunni groups received support from Sunni-majority countries, while Shia groups, particularly from Iran, also got involved in the conflict, further deepening the Sunni-Shia divide.
3. The Gulf War (1990-1991): The Gulf War, triggered by Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, exacerbated sectarian tensions in the region. Sunni-majority countries, led by Saudi Arabia, formed a coalition against Iraq, which was led by Sunni dictator Saddam Hussein. Iran, a Shia-majority country, cautiously supported the coalition against Iraq but also faced criticism from Sunni countries due to its regional ambitions and support for Shia movements.
These milestones, among others, played a significant role in intensifying the Sunni-Shia divisions by the end of the 20th century, creating complex political and religious dynamics that continue to shape the region today.
To learn more about Iranian Revolution of 1979, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32304525
#SPJ11
What is the main concern in History???
Please Help Thank You
Answer: The button someone was about to press and unalive us by nukin the world
Explanation:
History is the study of the past in its totality. It is specifically concerned with the human past since the advent of written records about 5,000 years ago.
What is the difference between federal and federalism?
Answer:
A federation (also known as a federal state) is a political entity characterized by a union of partially self-governing provinces, states, or other regions under a central federal government (federalism). ... It can be considered the opposite of another system, the unitary state.
Explanation:
A united country that displayed a great amount of nationalism is characteristic of what era?
Answer: The Era of Good Feelings
Explanation:
A united country that displayed a great amount of nationalism is characteristic of the "Era of Good Feeling".
What was the Era of Good Feeling?
After the War of 1812, the United States entered a period known as the Era of Good Feelings.
The Era of Good Feelings marked a period in the political history of United States that reflected a sense of national purpose and a desire for unity among Americans in the aftermath of the War of 1812.
The era saw the collapse of the Federalist Party and an end to the bitter partisan disputes between it and the dominant Democratic-Republican Party during the First Party System.
The phrase of Era of Good Feelings was coined by Benjamin Russell in the Boston Federalist newspaper Columbian Centinel on July 12,1817.
Learn more about the Era of Good Feeling here:
https://brainly.com/question/1537174
#SPJ2
what is the authors purpose for including the scene in his memoir? The narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass: Exerpt from chapter 1
A: it provides the family history that is necessary for readers to understand Frederick Douglas ‘ memoir.
B: aunt Hester‘s disobedience illustrates the root of most conflicts between slave Masters and their slaves.
C: it contrasts Douglas’ grandmothers actions towards her master with Aunt Hester‘s actions revealing his grandmothers wisdom
D: her dignity contrast with the Masters violence actions towards her, emphrasing the masters cruelty
Answer:
D: her dignity contrast with the Masters violence actions towards her, emphrasing the masters cruelty
Explanation:
took the test
Note one challenge the united states will face with immigration policies during the 21st century.
One challenge the United States will face with immigration policies during the 21st century is striking a balance between national security and economic needs.
The U.S. relies on the skills, innovation, and workforce contributions of immigrants to maintain a competitive global economy. However, ensuring national security is also crucial, as the country needs to prevent potential threats from entering its borders.To address this challenge, the U.S. government must develop comprehensive immigration policies that encompass thorough background checks and vetting processes for potential immigrants.
This requires effective collaboration between various government agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State, to share information and resources.At the same time, the U.S. must continue to promote legal pathways for skilled immigrants, international students, and refugees who can contribute to the country's growth and diversity.
This may include streamlining visa application processes, providing accessible resources for integration, and implementing policies that promote social cohesion and economic opportunities for new arrivals.
For more questions on immigration policies
https://brainly.com/question/9530779
#SPJ11
why did herbert spencer’s theories on social darwinism appeal to imperialists?
how did trade along the Silk Road benefit the Chinese people
A. they gained new methods for producing metalwork and glass
B. they gained knowledge of how to grow crops such as grapes and cotton
C. they gained understanding of how to mine resources such as silver and gold
D. they gained access to items they did not have, such as salt and certain spices.
hurry ill mark brainliest
Answer:
the anwser is a
Explanation:
more than any other general, william t. sherman recognized:
As a Union general during the American Civil War, William T. Sherman is recognized for his strategic vision and his implementation of "total war" tactics.
He believed in targeting not only enemy soldiers but also the civilian infrastructure that supported them, including farms, factories, and railroads. This approach aimed to weaken the Confederacy's ability to continue fighting and to break the morale of its citizens. Sherman's most famous campaign was his March to the Sea in 1864, during which he led his troops on a destructive path through Georgia, destroying property and infrastructure along the way.
This campaign, along with his capture of Atlanta, helped to secure President Abraham Lincoln's reelection in 1864 and dealt a major blow to the Confederacy. Sherman's tactics were controversial at the time, but they paved the way for the Union's ultimate victory in the war.
Learn more about total war here
https://brainly.com/question/23581423
#SPJ11
According to representative london, why would it be hypocritical for the united states to limit immigration from europe?
Answer:
Probably because almost all the early immigrants to the United States came from Europe.
It is hypocritical for the United States to limit immigration from Europe, Probably because most of all the early immigrants to the United States come through from Europe.
What is immigration?Immigration is the world-wide apparent movement of citizenries to a finish country where they are neither natives nor citizens in order to found themselves as permanent residents or naturalized citizens.
The United States' policy of restricting immigration from Europe is hypocritical, owing to the fact that most of the country's early immigrants came from Europe.
Therefore, the immigration is the permanent movement of peoples from one place to another country.
Learn more about the immigration, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/13688875
help no links and will give brainliest!!!!
Answer: B. camp meetings
Explanation:
Different regions of the United States had different opinions about the war of 1812. Summarize attitudes in the West, South, and Northeast, and reasons for those views.
The different regions in the United States reacted differently to the War of 1812. These reactions were based the individual benefits that they were deprived of because of the war.
The West and the South supported the war while the Northeasterners especially New England colonies were against the war because it hampered their trade with Great Britain.
What was the War of 1812?The war of 1812 was an armed conflict which was fought between the United States and Great Britain over British violations of U.S. maritime rights. It ended with the exchange of ratifications of the Treaty of Ghent.
The war resulted in different sections of the country either supporting or against the war. The support showed during the war was basically due to the regions individual economic interests.
The major cause of the war was based on two main factors and they include the following
British Orders-in-Council, which limited American trade with Europe, and impressmentThe Royal Navy's practice of taking seamen from American merchant vessels to fill out the crews of its own chronically undermanned warships.The west and the south supported the war because they were against Great Britain's restrictions of their trade with Europe.
The Northeast especially the Federalists ( New Englander colonies) accused war advocates of using the excuse of maritime rights to promote their expansionist agenda. They were also against the war because it distorted their trade with Great Britain.
Learn more about the War of 1812 at https://brainly.com/question/21750389
#SPJ1
7
Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
What is the acronym of the government body that works toward providing federal financial aid for education in the United States?
The
2022 Edmentum. All rights reserved.
provides federal financial aid for education in the United States.
Reset
Next
The acronym of the government body that works toward providing federal financial aid for education in the United States is FAFSA.
What is FAFSA?FAFSA is an abbreviation for Federal Application for Student Aid and it can be defined as a form that is issued to either a current or prospective university student in the United States of America, in order to help determine whether or not he or she is eligible for student loans and other financial aid.
In United States of America, the earliest a student can submit his or her Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is October 1st of each year.
In conclusion, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the Federal Application for Student Aid (FAFSA) provides federal financial aid for education in the United States of America.
Read more on FAFSA here: https://brainly.com/question/1339985
#SPJ1
The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972 limited contributions by individuals to no more than _____ in each primary or general election campaign for federal office.
The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972 limited contributions by individuals to no more than $25,000 in each primary or general election campaign for federal office.
The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was enacted in 1971 by the United States Congress. FECA provides a framework for regulating federal elections in the United States and put limits on the size of contributions to federal political campaigns and expenditures by candidates and campaigns.
Under the law, an individual may contribute up to 2,900 to a candidate per election, with a maximum total of $5,800 per candidate for a primary and general election cycle. For PACs, individuals can contribute up to $5,000 per year, while corporations and unions may not contribute directly to campaigns but can create and fund political action committees to do so. Individuals are limited to a total of 117,000 in contributions over two years.
It is important to note that these limits can change over time as a result of inflation and other factors.In conclusion, The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1972 limited contributions by individuals to no more than 25,000 in each primary or general election campaign for federal office.
To know more about result visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27751517
#SPJ11
Select all statements that are true about retrospective studies. Subjects are grouped based on common factors. Outcomes are established prior to the study. Subjects are given a treatment or placebo. Outcomes are established after the study. Data are collected from a past time period. Data are collected at a future time period
Retrospective studies are studies that are carried out after the outcome has been established.
Data collection for these studies is done after the outcome has already been established. It is a type of research design that examines a specific group of people's past activities and experiences. The participants' memories are frequently used to collect data. In retrospective studies, the outcomes are established before the study, and data are collected from a past time period.Statements that are true about retrospective studies are:Subjects are grouped based on common factors.Data is collected from a past time period.
Outcomes are established prior to the study.Outcomes are established after the study is not true.The subjects are not given any treatment or placebo.Data are not collected at a future time period since the data collection has already occurred for a retrospective study. Retrospective studies are usually more manageable to undertake since the outcome is already known. It is essential to note that the memories of participants may not always be reliable, and it may affect the accuracy of the data.
Therefore, it is necessary to conduct the research carefully and to validate the accuracy of the data collected.
To learn more about data :
https://brainly.com/question/29117029
#SPJ11
Question 23 1 pts Germany in 1936 has been the sole example of a country using the Summer Olympic Games as a means to promote its political ideology. True False
The given statement "Germany in 1936 has been the sole example of a country using the Summer Olympic Games as a means to promote its political ideology." is false.The 1936 Summer Olympics, also identified as the Games of the XI Olympiad, was a global multi-sport occasion held in Berlin, Germany, from August 1 to 16, 1936. Germany hosted the 1936 Summer Olympics and leveraged them for political purposes, seeking to promote its political ideology of Aryan supremacy. The notion of Germany being the "sole example" of utilizing the Olympic Games to promote political ideology is inaccurate and hence, the given statement is false.Note: Many countries throughout history have utilized the Olympics as a means of promoting their political ideologies. For example, the Soviet Union's usage of the 1980 Summer Olympics to promote communism, the United States' usage of the 1984 Summer Olympics to promote capitalism, and China's usage of the 2008 Summer Olympics to promote its emerging global dominance and its adherence to communism.
For more question like Olympic visit the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15246407
#SPJ11
After the Civil War, work contracts for African Americans required them to work:
6 days per week
0 40 hours per week
Answer:
6 days per week hope this helps you
What is the purpose of a protest?
A protest is an organized event in which people join
to show that they don't approve of something.
They can help bring attention to issues that need to be addressed
and can be a positive way to make some sort of change happen.
The main purpose people take part in them is because they want change.
Their goal is to make others have a different perspective
on an issue which can sometimes lead to not peaceful protests.