Answers
A city is a type of a political jurisdiction which is basically created from the bottom up.
The correct option is option a.
A political jurisdiction is basically defined as a county, city, township, a clearly identifiable neighborhood or their political equivalent, or any kind of individual portion thereof. A city is a type of political jurisdiction which is created from the bottom up.
A jurisdiction can basically be defined as a particular area which has a set of laws that are under the control of a system of courts or under the government entity itself that are very different from neighboring areas.
Hence, the correct option is a.
To know more about jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
Related Questions
A. COMMUNIST PARTY
B. DEMOCRATIC PARTY
C. LIBERTARIAN PAR TY
D. REPUBLICAN PARTY
E. SOCIALIST PARTY
1. "WE, THE WORKERS AND OUR ALLIES, NEED TO TAKE POWER FROM THE
HANDS OF THE WEALTHY FEW AND THEIR CORPORATIONS. EVERYTHING BELONGS
TO EVERYBODY."
2. "THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD OPERATE AND OWN THE HOSPITALS SO
EVERYONE CAN GET MEDICAL TREATMENT. EVERYBODY PAYS, SO EVERYBODY
RECEIVES."
3. "WE BELIEVE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS ARE ESSENTIAL TO FREEDOM. IT IS NOT THE
GOVERNMENT'S JOB TO HELP US"
4. "GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE SPENDING MONEY ON EDUCATION AND
HEALTHCARE, NOT MILITARY PROGRAMS."
5. "PEOPLE SHOULD TAKE CARE OF THEIR OWN BUSINESS, BECAUSE LESS
GOVERNMENT AND TAXES IS BETTER."
lol
Answers
B) E
C) C
D) B
5) D
Aceable Driving Test
1. The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the _______ insurance will covered.
A.) total amount
B.) bodily damage
C.) the maximum payment
D.) GAP Coverage
Answers
Answer:
A: the total amount it will cover I think
The 60 in 30/60/25 refers to the total amount insurance will covered. Texas rules require you to have at least $30,000 in bodily injury coverage per person.
What is insurance coverage?
insurance coverage is the amount of liability that a person can cover or entitle for a particular loss or damage against insurance services.
Insurance is of many types like auto insurance, life insurance, vehicle insurance, and others.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about insurance coverage, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15702391
#SPJ2
Tax Deficiency: You are a federal judge hearing the case of a defendant who is being charged with tax evasion. The defendant is a musician who has earned a large amount of money over the last two years and who has paid some taxes but not enough to cover her total income. She pleads ignorance of the tax laws and explains that she had hired an inept accountant who misinformed her about her total income. She provides proof that the accountant told her she would have to pay a much smaller amount than what she actually owed. She is willing to pay what she owes but does not feel that she should be penalized in any way.
1) Is ignorance of tax law an adequate defense?
2) Is the accountant liable in any way, and does his inefficiency contribute to her defense?
Your initial post should be at least two paragraphs (4-5 sentences per paragraph)
Answers
No the ignorance of the law in the court can not be used as a liable excuse especially when the law is clear for all.
Yes the accountant is liable for the misinformation of the defense client and this may be able to help her in her defense.
Is Ignorance an excuse in the law court?The idea that ignorance of the law is not a valid defense is a cornerstone of American legal doctrine. If the defense of ignorance were to be adopted, anyone accused of a crime may utilize this defense to escape punishment. Regardless of whether a person is aware of and understands the laws, they nonetheless apply to them. This is predicated on the notion that public knowledge of legislation has been disseminated through government journals, newspapers, printed materials, online sites, and other means.
The accountant is going to be liable to the woman because they failed in the duty that they were supposed to provide her.
Read more on tax evasion here: https://brainly.com/question/27557523
#SPJ1
Is this an arguement? If it is put it in standard form. If not explain why?
Why should I believe you, when you always lie?
Answers
The statement "Why should I believe you, when you always lie?" can be considered an argument. In order to put it in standard form, we need to identify the premises and the conclusion.
Premise: You always lie.
Conclusion: I should not believe you.
Therefore, in standard form, the argument can be expressed as:
Premise 1: You always lie.
Conclusion: I should not believe you.
This argument presents a generalization about the person's tendency to lie, leading to the conclusion that believing them is not justified.
Learn more arguement here
https://brainly.com/question/32324099
#SPJ4
Fill in the blank. When judges use previous judicial rulings to guide their decisions, they are employing the doctrine of_____
Answers
When judges use previous judicial rulings to guide their decisions, they are employing the doctrine of "stare decisis". This doctrine promotes consistency and predictability in the legal system by ensuring that judges rely on established principles and precedents when making decisions.
When judges use previous judicial rulings to guide their decisions, they are employing the doctrine of stare decisis. Stare decisis is a Latin term that means "to stand by things decided." It is a legal principle that requires judges to follow the decisions of previous courts in similar cases.
This principle is based on the idea that predictability and consistency in judicial decisions are essential for the stability of the legal system.
The doctrine of stare decisis is important because it promotes fairness and equality in the law. It ensures that similar cases are treated in the same way, and it prevents judges from making arbitrary or capricious decisions.
However, stare decisis is not an absolute rule, and judges can depart from precedent in certain circumstances. For example, if a previous decision was clearly wrong or if new facts or legal developments have emerged, a judge may decide to overrule or distinguish a previous case.
It helps maintain stability and fairness in the judicial process, and allows individuals and organizations to have a clearer understanding of the law.
In summary, the doctrine of stare decisis is a fundamental principle of the common law system. It reflects the idea that judges should base their decisions on the decisions of previous courts, while also allowing for flexibility and adaptability in the law.
Visit here to learn more about Doctrine of Stare Decisis:
brainly.com/question/21085371
#SPJ11
As an attorney for Dudley and Stephens, what arguements would you make on their behalf? As an attorney for the government, what arguments would you make on the government's behalf?
Answers
Answer:
Dudly and Stephen’s murder was unecceptable, and I have no arguments. What they had done was selfish, and not even nessecary. As an attorney for the government, the two murders most certainly go to prison for a lifetime due to cannabalism.
Explanation:
Can someone help me with this?
Case Description: You are a legal assistant who has been given the following paternity cases to review. It is your job to screen each case to see it there is any validity to the claim of an
"illegitimate" child and them make your recommendations to the lawyers for whom you work for. Proceed with your recommendations, indicating a "yes" or "no" result on the Case Analysis form for each potential case. Also, write out the genetic make-up. (letter combinations) for each case indicating why you choose "yes" or "no"
Answers
Answer & Explanation:
Case 1: No. The child's blood type is O, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and O. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.
Case 2: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents.
Case 3: No. The child's blood type is B, which cannot be produced from the combination of two B parents. The possible blood types for the father would be B or AB.
Case 4: Yes. The child's blood type is O, which is possible with the combination of O and O blood types from the parents.
Case 5: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of B and A blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A or AB.
Case 6: No. The child's blood type is A, which cannot be produced from the combination of O and O blood types from the parents. The possible blood types for the father would be A, B, or AB.
Case 7: Yes. The child's blood type is A, which is possible with the combination of A and B blood types from the parents. The genetic make-up for the child in question would be AO, which can be produced from the combination of AB and B blood types from the parents.
which of the following protect every individual against arbitrary action by national or state governments?
Answers
The following protects every individual against arbitrary action by national or state governments is Due process of law. option (A) is correct.
Fair treatment of regulation is essential, protected ensures that all judicial procedures will be fair and that one will be withdrawn from the procedures, and have a chance to be heard before the public authority acts to remove one's life, freedom, or property.
An inconsistent activity can be characterized as a choice. In the erratic, it a not entirely settled by judgment and that judgment isn't given for a particular explanation or rule. It is given from an overall perspective.
Subsequently, fair treatment regulations give insurance to each person against inconsistent activity by public or state legislatures.
Learn more about arbitrary action:
https://brainly.com/question/14592279
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
which of the following protect every individual against arbitrary action by national or state governments?
A) due procedural laws
B) due process laws
C) private rights
D) equality rights
Do you think there should be age restrictions on the taking of photographs and fingerprints of juvenile delinquents? Why or why not?
Answers
It can be debatable whether or young offenders' fingerprints and pictures can be taken without their consent. The use of a minor's fingerprints in a criminal prosecution or conviction may result in stigmatization.
How old may a child commit a crime?Criminal law: Nothing committed by a child under the age of seven constitutes a crime according to the Indian Penal Code. If it is determined that the kid has not yet developed the capacity to comprehend the nature and implications of his act, the age of criminal liability is increased to 12 years.
Should children be tried in adult courts as adults?Juvenile refers to youngsters who are under the age and developmental stage of adults. Juvenile Justice (Care) Act For the purposes of a criminal prosecution and punishment in a court of law, a juvenile shall not be treated as an adult under the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000.
To know more about criminal prosecution visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30648159
Black American men were granted suffrage before American women.
True
False
Answers
Answer:false
Explanation:
Black men were given voting rights in 1870, while black women were effectively banned until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
What does no ex post facto laws?
Answers
The United States Constitution, as well as the constitutions of other nations, both uphold the idea of "no ex post facto laws." Ex post facto refers to laws that modify the legal ramifications or status of actions carried out before the legislation was established. The term is derived from the Latin ex post facto, which means "after the fact."
The "no ex post facto legislation" principle forbids the application of criminal laws retroactively to render an act unlawful after it has already been done or to impose harsher penalties for an already-committed act. This means that the government cannot enact legislation that would criminalize conduct that wasn't already unlawful or that would enhance the penalties for conduct that has already been committed. This rule aims to safeguard people from capricious and retroactive criminal penalties and to advance justice and predictability in the criminal justice system.
For such more question on ex post facto:
brainly.com/question/2498364
#SPJ4
-The amount of alcohol in a person's body is measured by
Answers
how many justices currently sit on the supreme court
Answers
Answer:
nine justices
Explanation:
There are currently nine justices on the Supreme Court, though that number is not set in the Constitution and has changed throughout history. There are eight associate justices, and one chief justice. Supreme Court justices are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They serve a life term.
True or false. In cases of sexual assault robbery and battery the victim must prove in court they actively resisted the crime.
Answers
Hope this helps
System of law which uses precedents in order to ensure consistency is
A.
rule of law
B.
bill of rights
C.
constitutional law
D.
common law
Answers
Answer:
..
Explanation:
Answer:
it maybe be c
Examine five limitations of the electoral management body.
Answers
Some limitation could include not well coordinated election process, lack of timely information, delay in arrival of electoral materials. Note that this sis not applicable at all times but there are possibilities of occurrence.
What is electoral management body?
Electoral management body helps to manage electoral process and see to the success.
The coordinate all electoral process from voting to counting of votes. Every parastatals have its own strength an weakness.
At times when election do not go as proposed it can referred to as a limitation or when coordination of the process is not well managed.
Therefore, Some limitation could include not well coordinated election process, lack of timely information, delay in arrival of electoral materials. Note that this sis not applicable at all times but there are possibilities of occurrence.
Learn more on management process below
https://brainly.com/question/28072798
#SPJ1
determine what type of evidence the following may be: A man holding a book of matches at the scene of a fire
Answers
Answer:
Well, The only specific evidence we have at the current scene would be that man that has a book of matches but sense we cant really determine whether or not he was the one who did it, therefore we have no exponential evidence that he did it.
Explanation:
the constitution does not specifically state that a defendant has the right to an impartial judge. which supreme court case ruled this was a right for all defendants?
Answers
Tumey v. Ohio Supreme Court case ruled this was a right for all defendants
Tumey v. Ohio was a 1927 case heard by the United States Supreme Court. The court overturned an Ohio legislation that deprived persons of their constitutionally provided right to due process by monetarily rewarding public officials who successfully prosecuted Prohibition cases.
The Sixth Amendment protects criminal defendants’ rights, including the right to a speedy public trial, the right to counsel, an unbiased jury, and the right to know who their accusers are and the nature of the allegations and evidence against them. It has been most prominently challenged in a number of instances concerning terrorism. Still, it appears far more frequently in situations involving (for example) jury selection or witness protection, including victims of sexual offenses as well as witnesses in need of reprisal protection.
For more information on Defendants’ rights, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/16223801
#SPJ4
one of the most prevalent cyber-crimes is phishing scams. phishing scams are accomplished by:
Answers
Phishing scams are accomplished through deceptive tactics such as spoofed emails, fake websites, and requests for personal information.
In order to trick people into disclosing sensitive information like passwords, credit card numbers, or social security numbers, phishing scams are a common type of cybercrime. Various techniques such as spoof emails, fake websites, and fraudulent messages posing as official entities or organizations are frequently used to carry out these scams.
Attackers who use phishing frequently use psychological manipulation techniques to instill a sense of urgency, fear or trust in their targets and persuade them to take immediate action or divulge sensitive information. To gain credibility and raise their chances of success, they might adopt the identities of well known businesses, financial institutions or governmental organizations.
Learn more about Phishing scams at:
brainly.com/question/31216789
#SPJ4
The committee in the house that proposes time limitations on debate for bills is called the.
Answers
The committee in the house that proposes time limitations on debate for bills would be called the Rules Committee.
The procedure for bringing a piece of legislation to the floor, the number of amendments that will be taken into account, and the duration of the debate are all determined by the Rules Committee. Typically, the committee establishes the parameters for discussion and has the authority to waive any points of order that the House might otherwise raise in opposition to a bill or an amendment.
It is appropriate for the Speaker to maintain tight control over the Rules Committee because of its crucial role in regulating the legislative process. Original jurisdiction issues and special orders for consideration are the two main areas under which the Rules Committee has jurisdiction. The parameters of a measure's or matter's debate are set forth in a special rule.
Learn to know more about Debate on
https://brainly.com/question/20377585
#SPJ4
Elsa, 26 years of age, was employed as a rigger for Frozen Pty Ltd. While she operated one crane at work, she was struck in the face by a heavy steel chain which slipped out from a machine operated by another crane worker. The blow to her face rendered her unconscious for several minutes. The blow also broke bones in her nose and cheeks. She spent 12 days in hospital, including having cranial surgery to insert plates. From the surgery, she has scarring over her head mostly behind her hairline. She has been left virtually blind in her left eye. She has lost sensation on the left side of her forehead and cheek. She lost her sense of smell and, because of that, most of her sense of taste. She has some degree of memory impairment and some
mood effects. After four months, she had recovered sufficiently to return to her work as a rigger, on light duties. A month later, she was back to working full hours and after another month, she was doing her full pre-injury duties. Nevertheless, she no longer felt comfortable performing those duties and, in any event, was offered new employment in a field she had been pursuing for some years, working as a construction supervisor in a large building company. She took up that employment in November 2015, earning a higher salary than she earned in her previous employment as a rigger. However, Elsa found that although she really enjoyed the new job, her health problems from the original accident at Frozen Pty Ltd worsened while at her new job
which meant that she had to leave. Elsa now wants to sue Frozen Ply Ltd in negligence for injuries sustained from her
original workplace injuries Task: Advise whether Elsa may be successful in a claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence. Discuss the relevance of vicarious liability and any defences which may be raised by Frozen Pty Ltd as part of
your response. Use case references to support your answer.
Answers
Elsa may have a viable claim for compensation through the Common Law of Negligence against Frozen Pty Ltd. The employer has a duty of care towards its employees to provide a safe working environment and take reasonable measures to prevent accidents and injuries.
Vicarious liability may be relevant in this case, as it holds an employer liable for the actions of its employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Frozen Pty Ltd may raise defenses to mitigate or avoid liability. One possible defense is contributory negligence, arguing that Elsa's own actions or conduct contributed to the injuries. However, the severity of the injuries and the fact that Elsa was simply performing her job duties as a rigger may weaken this defense.
Case references and further legal analysis would be necessary to fully assess Elsa's chances of success in her claim. Consulting with a legal professional specializing in personal injury law would provide a comprehensive evaluation of the specific circumstances and applicable laws in this jurisdiction to determine the strength of Elsa's case.
Learn more about jurisdiction : brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ11
because many victims do not report their experiences to the police, the ucr has been adjusted to address the issue of nonreporting of crime. True or False
Answers
The given statement "because many victims do not report their experiences to the police, the UCR has been adjusted to address the issue of nonreporting of crime" is true.
The UCR (Uniform Crime Report) has been adjusted to address the issue of nonreporting of crime. This is because many victims do not report their experiences to the police, which can result in an incomplete and inaccurate picture of crime in a given area.
The UCR now includes estimates of unreported crimes based on surveys of victims, in an attempt to provide a more accurate representation of crime rates.
To know more about UCR, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30273202#
#SPJ11
The European Union is an example of which of the following?
A. A tax
B. A trade agreement
C. A law
D. A statute
Answers
Answer:
A trade agreement
Explanation:
Answer:
B. A trade agreement
Explanation:
vận dụng cặp phạm trù nguyên nhân và kết quả trong giả quyết tai nạn giao thông
Answers
Answer:
srryy i have know Idea im here for points
Within police departments, there is a focus on the status of individuals as opposed to their behavior. Training officers [TOs] teach recruits what to look for in terms of potential danger, and officers tell each other stories about things they have seen that mark individuals as dangerous. This can be referred to as:
Group of answer choices
criminal motivation
criminal intent
police interaction
criminal blindness
Answers
Answer:
the answer is criminal motivationnnnnnn
Explanation:
today the most common public order crimes do not include:
Answers
Today, the most common public order crimes do not include more serious offenses such as violent behavior, drug trafficking, and weapon-related crimes. Rather, the most common public order crimes are typically non-violent offenses that disrupt the peace and order in a community.
These may include disorderly conduct, public intoxication, loitering, trespassing, and vandalism. One of the reasons these offenses are considered public order crimes is that they can create a sense of fear and unease among community members and can lead to a breakdown in social order. While these offenses may not seem as serious as other crimes, they can still have a significant impact on the quality of life in a community. Overall, public order crimes are those that violate community norms and expectations, and they are typically handled by local law enforcement agencies. While the types of public order crimes may vary from place to place, the goal of law enforcement is to maintain public safety and order, and to ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions.
Learn more about drug trafficking here:
https://brainly.com/question/30125092
#SPJ11
Your book lists four types of evidence. Which are the two types that are the
most common in trials.
A)Stipulated facts and testimony
B)Judicial notice and stipulated facts
C) Exhibits and testimony
D) Exhibits and judicial notice
Answers
Answer:
I think the answer should be A
Which of the following statements regarding release on parole is true?
Offenders have a constitutional right to parole
Inmates released by discretionary parole are more likely to succeed than those released through mandatory parole
An offender's civil rights are restored when the offender is granted parole
If an offender's parole is revoked, the offender is automatically returned to prison
Answers
Answer: Inmates released by discretionary parole are more likely to succeed than those released through mandatory parole
Explanation: When considering the approach of parole, the discretionary parole is a more tried-and-true method for offenders to succeed in completion of Parole Sentencing. This tends to be from the elements of morality, and the fact that Mandatory parole is normally seen as a dodging method to avoid credibility and responsibility for actions. (Feels like you got away with it).
Inmates released by discretionary parole are more likely to succeed than those released through mandatory parole release on parole is true. Thus, option D is correct.
What is parole?Prior to serving out their entire sentence, offenders may be released on parole. A state servant known as a parole officer oversees inmates on parole. Individuals on parole risk being sent back to jail if they break the terms of their pardons.
People arrested on voluntary parole have a higher success rate than just those placed on obligatory parole.
Discretionary parole is the option of releasing a defendant from custody for whom the imprisonment has not yet run out, subject to continued good behavior under the supervision and oversight of parole officers in the communities who guarantee adherence to the criteria of discharge.
Therefore, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about parole, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14320965
#SPJ2
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answers
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
I was confused which one correct
Answers
Answer:
II and III
Explanation: