Harveer is facing a conflict of interest . He should disclose the conflict, recuse himself, and follow fair procurement processes.
Harveer is facing a conflict of interest ethical issue. A conflict of interest arises when an individual's personal or financial interests conflict with their professional obligations or duties. In this case, Harveer's personal relationship with a supplier creates a potential bias or favoritism that could compromise the fair and objective decision-making process within the company.I will analyze Harveer's ethical issue using the Blanchard Peale framework. The Blanchard Peale framework consists of three questions: "Is it legal? Is it balanced? How does it make me feel?"Is it legal? Harveer's personal relationship with the supplier may not be illegal per se, but it raises concerns about fair competition and impartiality in the procurement process. It is important to ensure compliance with legal regulations and organizational policies regarding conflicts of interest.Is it balanced? Harveer needs to consider the potential impact of his actions on the company, its stakeholders, and the broader business environment. Giving preferential treatment to a supplier based on personal relationships may undermine fair competition and harm the company's reputation.How does it make me feel? Harveer should reflect on his own values, principles, and ethical standards. He needs to assess whether his actions align with integrity, fairness, and the best interests of the company and its stakeholders.As the Ethics Manager, I would recommend that Harveer disclose the conflict of interest to the appropriate authority within the company. Transparency is crucial in addressing conflicts of interest. Harveer should recuse himself from any decision-making processes involving the supplier and ensure that the procurement process is fair, transparent, and based on objective criteria. Additionally, the company should consider implementing clear policies and guidelines on conflicts of interest to prevent similar situations in the future and promote a culture of ethical behavior. Regular training and awareness programs can also help employees understand the importance of avoiding conflicts of interest and making decisions based on merit and fairness.For more questions on conflict of interest
brainly.com/question/21648646
#SPJ8
Human beings are the only animal accountable before the law discuss in critical thinking apparoach
Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.
One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.
Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.
Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.
Why was the Roe v. Wade court decision so important? 200
words
The Roe v. Wade court decision was an important decision in the United States in 1973. This landmark decision made by the Suprem abortions in the United States by recognizing that women had a constitutional right to have an abortion.
The Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional right to privacy meant that a woman had the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. This ruling was a landmark decision as it recognized the right of women to make their own choices regarding their bodies.
Prior to this decision, many states had banned abortion except in certain cases. This decision was therefore significant as it was a victory for women's reproductive rights, which was an important step forward in the fight for women's rights.The Roe v. Wade court decision had a significant impact on American society and on the broader fight for women's rights. The decision was a turning point in the debate over abortion in the United States and was instrumental in the legalization of abortion in many other countries around the world.
To know more about Roe.v wade visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10295976
#SPJ11
Question
Refer to the article “The Future of Money” in your Money, Money, Money magazine for a complete version of this text.
How does the author best support the point that there are advantages to using digital currency?
Drag the correct answer into the box.
by describing ways that it can be safer and easier to use than traditional money
by giving opinions about benefits of using cryptocurrency and problems with using cash and credit
by explaining that digital transactions are fastest because they are handled by computers
The author supports the point by giving opinions on the benefits of using cryptocurrencies and problems with using cash and credit.
What Is Digital Currency?
Digital currency is only available in digital form. It isn't a material object with a physical actuality, unlike plutocrat or other goods like gold or oil painting. By streamlining the current fiscal system, digital plutocrat can grease briskly and more affordable fiscal deals. It may also make it simpler for central banks to apply financial policy.
Cryptocurrencies, digital currencies issued by central banks, and stablecoins are exemplifications of different types of digital plutocrat.
The amicable asset transfer and implicit reduction in sale costs are some benefits of digital currencies.
Digital currencies have some downsides, including the fact that they can be unpredictable to trade and are vulnerable to hacking.
To learn more on Digital currency from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28963893
#SPJ1
The one who assumes a risk in return for payment of a premium is the
a. insured.
b. homeowner.
c. insurer.
d. company.
Answer:
The one who assumes a risk in return for payment of a premium is the B) homeowner.
TRUE/FALSE. Most candidates avoid using "soft news" sources because they cannot reach voters that way.
FALSE. Most candidates do not avoid using "soft news" sources because they cannot reach voters that way.
"Soft news" sources, such as entertainment shows, lifestyle magazines, or social media platforms, have gained significant popularity and influence in contemporary media. Candidates, particularly during political campaigns, recognize the importance of reaching voters through diverse channels, including traditional news outlets as well as non-traditional or "soft news" platforms.
Candidates and their campaign teams often employ various strategies to engage with voters and raise awareness about their campaigns. This includes utilizing social media platforms, appearing on entertainment shows, participating in interviews with lifestyle magazines, and leveraging other forms of "soft news" to connect with a wider audience.
Engaging with "soft news" sources can be advantageous for candidates as these platforms often attract a broader demographic, including individuals who may not typically consume traditional news. By utilizing "soft news" sources, candidates can potentially reach new and diverse voter segments, expand their visibility, and increase their chances of capturing public attention.
Additionally, "soft news" sources often provide a more relaxed and informal setting for candidates to showcase their personality, share personal stories, and connect with voters on a more relatable level. This can help humanize candidates, make them more accessible, and establish an emotional connection with the electorate.
While traditional news outlets remain crucial for conveying policy positions, delivering in-depth analysis, and reaching specific target audiences, candidates recognize the value of utilizing a mix of media sources, including "soft news," to maximize their reach and engage with voters in a variety of settings.
In summary, candidates do not avoid using "soft news" sources because they cannot reach voters that way. On the contrary, most candidates actively seek opportunities to engage with these platforms, recognizing their potential to reach broader audiences, establish a personal connection, and supplement their campaign messaging through non-traditional channels.
Learn more about voters here
https://brainly.com/question/30680550
#SPJ11
Approximately what percentage of police agencies require a minimum of a four-year degree?.
Answer: One percent
Explanation: Currently, approximately one percent of local police departments in America require their officers to hold four-year degrees.
Approximately, one percent of agencies require a minimum of a four-year degree.
What is police agencies?
The term police agencies refer to based on the law enforcement agency. The police agencies was the required to the main motive to the safety of the people and also control the law and the crime. The police are the main role to track the criminal.
The educational requirements to become a police officer are the generate the employment on the one percent to the four-year degree. There were the agencies may hire an individual and the skill based person. The police agency was the also required the candidate degree.
As a result, the approximately, one percent of agencies require a minimum of a four-year degree.
Learn more about on police agencies, here;
https://brainly.com/question/5480665
#SPJ2
rite
levelopment? W
What sorts of changes have
been observing in your society
comparison to the last three yea
Prepare a short note based on it.
art Making Activity
Answer:
More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs.
Explanation:
More advancement in technology and freelancing jobs are the changes have been observing in the society as comparison to the last three years. Technology such as transportation, devices, medical and other industrial instruments and media devices are more advanced as compared to previous years. Due to these devices, people depend more on technology which is a source of easiness as well as causes adverse effect on health of people.
Where is the majority of a city budget spending?
State and local governments spend most of their resources on education, health, and social service programs. In 2019, about one-third of state and local spending went toward combined elementary and secondary education (22%) and higher education (9%).
How many different statutory "definitions of insanity" exist in the fifty states and federal government for the purpose of enabling a defendant to craft an "Insanity Defense?"
Different statutory "definitions of insanity" exist in the fifty states and federal government for the purpose of enabling a defendant to craft an "Insanity Defense" is M'Naghten Rule, the Durham Rule, the Model Penal Code, and the Irresistible Impulse Test.
There isn't a specific number of statutory "definitions of insanity" across the fifty states and the federal government for the purpose of an "Insanity Defense." Instead, the legal system in the United States uses several general standards or tests that have been adopted and modified by different jurisdictions. The M'Naghten Rule focuses on the defendant's cognitive ability to understand the nature and quality of their actions or to distinguish right from wrong.
The Durham Rule, also known as the Product Test, considers a defendant insane if their unlawful act was a product of a mental disease or defect. The Model Penal Code test assesses whether a defendant suffers from a mental disorder that impairs their ability to appreciate the criminality of their conduct or to conform to the requirements of the law. The Irresistible Impulse Test takes into account a defendant's inability to control their impulses due to a mental disease or defect, even if they are aware of the wrongfulness of their actions.
These standards are not uniformly applied across all states and the federal government, as each jurisdiction may adopt, modify, or combine elements of these tests to define insanity for the Insanity Defense. Additionally, some states have abolished the Insanity Defense altogether, further diversifying the landscape of legal definitions and standards related to insanity.
know more about Insanity Defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/30669067
#SPJ11
Why does the government require qualified 18-year-old males to register for selective service?
Answer:
c
Explanation:
the congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.True/False
The statement the congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration. is true as This statement is directly quoted from the 16th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which was ratified in 1913.
The 16th Amendment to the US Constitution gives Congress the authority to levy income taxes without having to divide them up among the states according to population or any other factor. The following is th amendment's complete text:
Without considering any census or enumeration and without apportioning income among the various States, the Congress shall have the authority to levy and collect taxes on incomes from any source.
Congress put forth the 16th Amendment in 1909, and the necessary number of states ratified it in 1913. It marked a significant change from earlier constitutional interpretations that had maintained that direct taxes needed to be distributed among the states based on population. The amendment gave Congress a lot of power.
To know more about taxes here
https://brainly.com/question/30157668
#SPJ4
Why might it be difficult to prosecute a citizen who violates its laws outside its borders, when the offence is not illegal in the country he or she is visiting?
Answer:
Anyone who commits a crime outside their country will be punished according to the local law of the receiving country. This has happened before for other Americans, some of whom made international headlines because of the crimes they were accused of. I think
Explanation:
HELP! ILL NAME YOU AS BRAINLIEST!!
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of
Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts, pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or
Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be
absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on
Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision
and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter
into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in
such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."
Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution
In what way does the Constitution limit the power of the states?
A) IT FORBIDS STATES FROM PRODUCING THEIR OWN MONEY
B) IT FORBIDS STATES FROM SUING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
C) IT FORBIDS STATES FROM ENFORCING IMPORT INSPECTION LAWS
D) IT FORBIDS STATES FROM VOTING ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
Answer:
A
Explanation:
"No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money;"
What does ABS stand for?
A) Anti-lock Braking System
B) Auto Brake System
C) Anti-Lock Backing System
D) Automatic Braking System
Answer:
The answer is Anti-lock braking system
Explanation:
I hope this helped!! :)
After a robbery why should you move away any place that a robber may have been?
After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.
What is the concept of the statement?Stealing from another person's person or immediate vicinity while using force or the threat of force with the purpose to steal aggravated robbery. The unjustifiable taking of someone else's property by using force or threatening to use force in order to instill fear.
Heists are defined as the theft of cash or valuable objects like artwork, jewellery, or silver. Under English and Welsh law, a robbery differs from a burglary in that a robbery entails the use of force which means that some of the heists commonly known as robberies were actually burglaries.
After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order to protect the crime scene and the evidence.
Thus, After a robbery, we should leave the area where the robber may have been in order.
For more details about concept of the statement, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25976833
#SPJ2
The Fourteenth Amendment establishes that no state can be allowed to remove any rights of citizens, that all persons who are born in the US or naturalized have citizenship regardless of race, that no person can be denied equal protection under the law, and that no person can be deprived of his or life, liberty, or property without a fair trial.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment is an amendment to the constitution of the United States of America and it addresses the issue of civil and legal rights for the African American citizens and slaves who had gained freedom after the American Civil War. The 14th Amendment is made up of the clause known as the equal protection of the laws.
An equal protection is a clause that states and guarantees that no state and local governments shall make or enforce any law which would contravene the privileges, rights or immunities of all persons born or naturalized in the United States of America.
Simply stated, the equal protection guarantees that all citizens will be treated equally by the law. Also, the equal protection clause took effect in the United States of America in 1868.
Define the Office of Civil Rights, and its responsibility as it relates to HIPAA.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards, in concert with its enforcement of the Privacy Rule, and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.
In summary, how does lobbying work? (This should be a long answer.)
Answer:
In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation is the act of lawfully attempting to influence the actions, policies, or decisions of government officials, most often legislators or members of regulatory agencies.
Explanation:
according to chuck mcrae, former justice on the mississippi supreme court, the power to get a group of lawyers who agree on a pro-business, anti-plaintiff point of view to civil litigation elected as majority of judges on a state supreme court the result is . . .
According to Chuck McRae, a former justice on the Mississippi Supreme Court, the result of getting a group of lawyers who agree on a pro-business, anti-plaintiff point of view to civil litigation elected as the majority of judges on a state supreme court is the "corporatization" of the judiciary.
However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the judges will always rule in favour of corporations or businesses. It just means that they are more likely to be sympathetic towards businesses and less likely to be sympathetic towards plaintiffs or individual citizens. This can have several implications for civil litigation.
For example, it can result in more dismissals of lawsuits, stricter evidentiary standards, more limits on damages, and a higher likelihood of favourable rulings for businesses. It can also lead to a perception of bias or unfairness in the justice system among the general public, especially among those who have experienced a negative outcome in a lawsuit involving a business or corporation.
For more such questions on the judiciary
https://brainly.com/question/27471151
#SPJ11
Why does the Party try to isolate citizens from each other?
A. To prevent romantic relationships from occurring
B. To prevent citizens from discussing the Party's policies and rising up against the government
C. To prevent an outbreak of a deadly pandemic
D. To maintain class separation
Answer:
B to prevent citizen from discussing the party policies and rising up against the government
The Party in George Orwell's novel 1984 tries to isolate citizens from each other mainly to prevent them from discussing the Party's policies and rising up against the government. The correct option is B
This is because the Party's ultimate goal is to maintain absolute control over the population and any form of dissent or rebellion is seen as a threat to its power.
Additionally, the Party discourages romantic relationships as they may distract citizens from their loyalty to the Party and potentially create a sense of loyalty towards their partner instead.
Maintaining class separation is also a tactic used by the Party to prevent unity among citizens and maintain the hierarchical structure of society.
The prevention of a deadly pandemic is not a primary reason for the Party's isolation tactics in the novel.
To know more about George Orwell's refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12380617#
#SPJ11
an employer can conduct a background check without your consent. is this true or false?
The statement "An employer can conduct a background check without your consent" is true because there are no federal laws in place that require an employer to obtain an applicant’s consent before conducting a background check.
However, some states and local jurisdictions may have their own laws and regulations regarding background checks that may require an employer to obtain consent.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) does not require an applicant's consent for an employer to conduct a background check, but it does require the employer to inform the applicant that a background check will be conducted.
The employer must also provide the applicant with a copy of the report and a summary of their rights under the FCRA if the employer decides not to hire the applicant based on the background check results. It is important for applicants to understand their rights and be aware of any state or local laws regarding background checks.
Learn more about background check https://brainly.com/question/27835258
#SPJ11
Using a specific example, discuss how marketers can accommodate different segments of their target market.
Advertising, influencer awareness, brand awareness are some of the marketing strategies that can help in getting access to different sectors of the target market.
What is a marketing strategy?Implementation of planning and taking appropriate step for the purpose of driving the sales and boosting profits of the organization is known as a marketing strategy.
Target advertisements to make sure that the correct set of audience consumes the advertisements; influencer marketing and creating brand awareness are some key marketing strategies in this regard.
Hence, the helpful marketing strategies are aforementioned.
Learn more about marketing strategy here:
https://brainly.com/question/15585962
#SPJ1
Which U.S. foreign policy goal does this scenario support?
The president of the United States sends an executive official to Taiwan to discuss its relations with China.
A. World peace
B. Spread of democracy
C. Humanitarian help
D. National security
The scenario described supports the U.S. foreign policy goal of Option D. national security.
By sending an executive official to Taiwan to discuss its relations with China, the United States is taking a proactive approach to safeguard its national security interests.
Taiwan is a strategically important region in East Asia, and its relationship with China is a critical factor in the overall stability of the region. China considers Taiwan as a part of its territory and has not ruled out the use of force to achieve reunification. The United States, on the other hand, has long been committed to ensuring the security and stability of Taiwan, as it is a key ally in the region.
By engaging in discussions with Taiwan regarding its relations with China, the United States is signaling its commitment to maintaining a strong presence in the Asia-Pacific region and protecting its national security interests. This engagement can involve military cooperation, intelligence sharing, and diplomatic support for Taiwan's international recognition.
Overall, this scenario aligns with the U.S. foreign policy goal of national security, as it reflects the United States' efforts to protect its interests and maintain stability in a region of strategic importance. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about national security here:
https://brainly.com/question/31226718
#SPJ8
Answer:
A. World peace
Explanation:
Discuss the issues law enforcement face in understanding cybercrime
Answer and Explanation:
One of the biggest problems facing law enforcement in cybercrime is data collection. This is because encryption, technological advances in software and the amount of different data, hinder the search for cyber criminals and often make this search impossible. Furthermore, as the internet is an editable medium, criminal data can be quickly erased and never found.
The interfaces and websites of private institutions are also a big challenge, as they can impede police access to their platforms, preventing law enforcement from being carried out.
Last but not least, cyber attacks can be extremely comprehensive and carried out simultaneously in many different locations and even in different countries and continents. This makes it difficult for the origin of the attack to be identified and hinders enforcement and laws, as countries have different laws to deal with this.
After a lengthy pursuit involving one assailant and 2 Troopers, the assailants vehicle had been disabled, the assailant decides to flee from the troopers on foot and was seen with a shotgun on his back, and a pistol on his side. The senior trooper on scene fired upon the assailant incapacitating him because he felt there was probable cause that the suspect presented a serious threat of injury or death to officers or others. What popular case law could apply in defense of the officer in this situation?
Answer:
I would think that only if they are pointing the guns at the officers or other individuals.
Explanation:
I found this on the internet though. Hope it helps some.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/can-police-use-lethal-force-fleeing-suspect
Can police officers shoot at fleeing individuals?
Only in very narrow circumstances. A seminal 1985 Supreme Court case, Tennessee vs. Garner, held that the police may not shoot at a fleeing person unless the officer reasonably believes that the individual poses a significant physical danger to the officer or others in the community. That means officers are expected to take other, less-deadly action during a foot or car pursuit unless the person being chased is seen as an immediate safety risk.
In other words, a police officer who fires at a fleeing man who a moment earlier murdered a convenience store clerk may have reasonable grounds to argue that the shooting was justified. But if that same robber never fired his own weapon, the officer would likely have a much harder argument.
“You don’t shoot fleeing felons. You apprehend them unless there are exigent circumstances — emergencies — that require urgent police action to safeguard the community as a whole,” said Greg Gilbertson, a police practices expert and criminal justice professor at Centralia College in Washington state.
state and explain the three types of voting
Answer:
the 3 types if voting is plurality, majority, and proportiona representations
Explanation:
Which law requires schools to adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication?.
Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) law mandates schools to adopt and execute an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and contact.
What is Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA)?The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) was legislated by Congress in 2000 to address situations about children's access to obscene or destructive content over the Internet.
The Children's Internet Protection Act, understood as "CIPA," needs libraries that participate in specific federal programs to install "technology protection measures" on all of their Internet access terminals, nevertheless of whether federal programs are produced for the terminals or Internet connections. Both of Congress's earlier endeavors at restricting indecent Internet content, the Communications Decency Act and the Child Online Protection Act, were maintained to be unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court on First Amendment grounds.
Hence, Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) law mandates schools to adopt and execute an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and contact.
To learn more about Children's Internet Protection Act refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14299588
#SPJ4
The schools are required to adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication according to Children's Internet Protection Act.
What is the Children's Internet Protection Act?This act was enacted by Congress in 2000. This act looks at children's access to obscene content on the Internet.
It requires the school and other educational institutions to block the access of the children to obscene content on the internet.
Thus, Children's Internet Protection Act is the law of 2000, which makes the schools adopt and implement an internet safety policy to filter and secure online content and communication.
To learn more, refer to: brainly.com/question/14299588
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an ethical issue that affects the pharmaceutical industry?
making drugs portable for patients who need to travel to other healthcare professionals
finding ways to make sure patients take their drugs as advised
making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
supporting patients’ autonomy by supplying enough advertising about drugs
Answer:
The answer is C. making available new drugs that have benefits to patients as well as risks of side effects
Explanation:
Trust me
The movie FINDING NEMO would fall under which intellectual property category? *
Answer: Copyright
Explanation:
Copyright category of IP Law that protects original works of authorship
- this extends to anything authored including literature, dramas, musicals, paintings, novels, songs, software, architecture, and movies!
hope this helps!
Lily has suffered severe injuries from a car accident. She would like to sue for compensation, but does not have enough funds on hand to retain an attorney on her own. What is the best type of fee arrangement for lily?.
The contingency fee is the best type of fee arrangement for lily as she would like to sue for compensation, but does not have enough funds on hand to retain an attorney on her own.
What is a contingency fee?Any fee for services rendered that is only collected if there is a favorable outcome is referred to as a contingent fee, also known as a contingency fee or a conditional fee. Although such a charge may be used in many different professions, it is most frequently linked with the practice of law.
A contingent fee is a fee levied for legal services that are only due if a lawsuit is successful or results in a favorable settlement, typically expressed as a percentage of the money the client receives as compensation. Because one must be rich enough to initiate such litigation in the first place in order to sue someone for a tort, contingent fees may make it simpler for persons with less financial resources to pursue their civil rights. Although accepting cases on a contingency basis is not without risk, lawyers won't do so unless they think the case has substance because of the danger of loss.
To know more about contingency fees visit:- https://brainly.com/question/13447810
#SPJ4