What three European nations fought for supremacy of North America during the Colonial and early Federal period of American history? Select all that apply.

Peru
Spain
China
France
Sweden
Great Britain

Answer:

itz a case...

Explanation:

Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.

“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’

Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.

Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.

He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”

Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.

A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.

“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”

He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.

Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.

DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.

Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”

As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.

The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.

The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.

The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.

The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.

To learn more about competency examinations, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/31646918

#SPJ4

The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The factor that is NOT one of the four factors used by arbitrators when deciding cases is "c.

The wording of the labor agreement: Arbitrators carefully examine the language and terms of the labor agreement that is in dispute. They analyze the specific clauses, provisions, and terms mentioned in the agreement.

Testimony and evidence offered during the hearing: Arbitrators review the testimonies and evidence presented by both parties during the arbitration hearing. This may include witness statements, documents, and other relevant evidence.

Past practice and precedents: Arbitrators consider past practices and precedents established in similar cases or within the industry. They look for consistency and previous decisions that may have bearing on the current case.

Relevant laws and regulations: Arbitrators take into account applicable laws and regulations that govern the particular labor agreement or dispute. This ensures that the decision aligns with legal requirements.

However, "c. How manag" is not a recognized factor used by arbitrators when deciding cases. It seems that the question may have been cut off, but based on the provided options, "c. How manag" does not align with the typical factors considered by arbitrators.

To know more about arbitrators, visit:

brainly.com/question/33985273

#SPJ11

Answer:

Murderer

Characteristics: Poisoner - Parricide

Number of victims: 1 +

Date of murder: August 28, 1965

Date of birth: 1933

Victim profile: His wife, Dr. Carmela Musetto, 32

Method of murder: Poisoning (anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride)

Location: New Jersey/Florida, USA

Status: Sentenced to life in prison on April 28, 1967. Paroled in 1979

Motive: So that he could marry his lover.

Crime: Coppolino was charged with killing his wife, Carmela at their home on Florida's Gulf of Mexico coast. He was also tried for murdering Colonel William E. Farber, the husband of his ex-lover Marjorie. However, he was acquitted from this offence.

Method: Coppolino gave Carmela an overdose in the form of an injection of the anaesthetic succinylcholine chloride.

Sentence: Coppolino was charged with second degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He served 12 years, before being let out for good behaviour.

Interesting facts: An overdose of succinylcholine chloride is difficult to detect in the body, as succinic acid and choline are found naturally in the body. To be able to prove this was the cause of Carmela's death, toxicologst Dr Joseph Umberger had to devise a test, which in June 1966 he succeeded in doing.

Coppolino was an experienced anaesthetist, who had had to give up work at an early age due to ill health. So he had the knowledge and the means to kill Carmela in this way.

It was claimed that Coppolino had also killed Farber in the same way. When he was exhumed, it was discovered that his cricoid cartilage was fractured, which suggested that he had been strangled. In court it was claimed that this damage could have occurred during exhumation, and that he had sufficient arteriosclerosis to have died of a heart attack, as was originally supposed.

The capacitance of parallel plate capacitors depends on the area of the plates because the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor is directly proportional to the area of the plates.

Hence the correct option is C.

A parallel plate capacitor's capacitance may be computed using the following formula:

C = ε0 * A / d

Where C is the capacitance, ε0 is the permittivity of free space (a constant value), A is the area of the plates, and d is the distance between the plates.

According to this formula, capacitance is directly proportional to plate area and inversely proportional to the distance between plates. While they are connected to the energy stored in the capacitor, the potential difference between the plates and the charge on the plates has no direct effect on capacitance.

For additional information about parallel plate capacitors, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12733413

#SPJ4

$0 t is their eligible amount of work-related daycare expenses. As They paid $250 per month for daycare. They are filing MFJ. Hence, option A is correct.

Fees paid to a licensed child care center, an individual caregiver, an after-school program, or an emergency or sick child care provider for the care of the employee's dependent children. Only care that enables the parent to work is covered by the child care costs.

Child care costs cannot be written off as a business expense since they are not typical, essential, or reasonable. Rent, utilities, pay, salaries, maintenance, depreciation, insurance, and the cost of items sold are a few examples of expenses.

Thus, option A is correct.

For more information about daycare expenses, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17238561

#SPJ1

Answer:

The best method of submitting evidence to a crime lab would be through personal delivery. Shipments through mail may be lost or misplaced, causing a contamination of the evidence and rendering it useless. The safe transportation of the evidence to a crime lab can only be assured through personal delivery.

Answer:

Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behavior. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges.

During plea bargaining, a multiple-offense indictment may be used by a prosecutor to increase their bargaining power and persuade the defendant to accept a plea bargain.

A multiple-offense indictment refers to a criminal charge that involves several different offenses committed by the defendant. These charges can include multiple counts of the same crime or various crimes committed during the same incident.

By including all these charges in the indictment, the prosecutor can show the defendant the severity of the charges they are facing and the potential penalties they could receive if they were to go to trial and be convicted on all counts.

The threat of facing multiple charges and a potentially lengthy sentence can be intimidating for a defendant, making them more likely to accept a plea bargain that offers a reduced sentence or lesser charges.

Therefore, prosecutors may use multiple-offense indictments strategically during plea bargaining to achieve their desired outcome. It is important to note, however, that the use of multiple-offense indictments must be within the bounds of the law and not used to intimidate or coerce a defendant into accepting a plea bargain.

For more question on prosecutor

https://brainly.com/question/28893404

#SPJ11

The given statement "Legal fees for LLCs (Limited Liability Companies) and LLPs (Limited Liability Partnerships) are not usually based solely on the number of members and complexity of the organization."  is False because While these factors can play a role in determining the fees, there are several other factors that can influence the cost.

The complexity of an LLC or LLP can vary greatly depending on various factors such as the nature of the business, the industry it operates in, the presence of multiple jurisdictions, contractual agreements, regulatory compliance requirements, and more. These complexities can impact the legal work involved and, consequently, the fees charged.

Additionally, legal fees can also be influenced by the specific legal services required. These may include formation and registration of the entity, drafting operating agreements or partnership agreements, obtaining necessary licenses and permits, intellectual property protection, contract drafting and negotiation, dispute resolution, and ongoing legal compliance.

Therefore, while the number of members and complexity of the organization can be factors, legal fees for LLCs and LLPs are determined by a combination of various factors, and it is important to consult with an attorney to obtain an accurate estimate based on your specific circumstances.

Know more about LLC  here:

https://brainly.com/question/14466609

#SPJ11

From the following, the one which is not a function of political parties is that, the selection of persons for government.

The primary function of a political party is to contest election, through which they try to form government. So, the political parties are considered to be the essential institutions of democracy. Thus, by competing in elections parties offer the citizens a choice in governance, and while in opposition.

However, the political parties tend to perform an important task in the government. So, they tend to bring the people who are together in order to achieve the control of the government.

To learn more about the political parties here:

https://brainly.com/question/29783542

#SPJ4

It is possible to classify Katelyn's behaviour as intentional infliction of emotional distress.

A tort (a type of civil wrong) known as intentional infliction of emotional distress is when someone purposefully or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another person. Physical assault, threats, humiliation, or other extreme and outrageous behaviour are just a few examples of this type of behavior's many manifestations. To prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, the victim must show that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, that the defendant intended to cause severe emotional distress, and that the victim actually suffered severe emotional distress as a result. It can be challenging to establish that a defendant intentionally caused emotional distress, and there must be solid proof that their actions were both deliberate and unreasonable.

To learn more about tort visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14614720

#SPJ1

Constitutional law includes only the U.S. Constitution.  False.

While it does include the U.S. Constitution in the context of the United States, constitutional law is not limited to a single constitution. Many countries have their own constitutions, and constitutional law encompasses the principles, doctrines, and legal frameworks surrounding those constitutions.

Each country's constitutional law governs issues such as the structure of government, the separation of powers, individual rights and freedoms, the relationship between the state and its citizens, and the judicial review of laws for constitutionality.

Learn more about U.S. Constitution

https://brainly.com/question/14453917

#SPJ11

Najmi would be responsible to understand the validity of the contract entered by his guardian Pak Mat concerning the sale of one of the properties of his late parents left to him.

Generally under contract law, a minor is considered to lack the capacity to enter into a valid and binding agreement as established in the Malaysian case of Verinder Singh v Kamikar Singh and another appeal ([1994] 2 MLJ 438). Under s 20 of the Contracts Act 1950, a minor is not capable to enter into a valid contract.

Thus, any contract entered into by a minor is said to be voidable at his/her option. Consequently, any contract entered into by a minor is voidable which allows him/her to avoid the contract and seek restitution.

To know more about contract law, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/31340061

#SPJ4

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Let’s say this.

A group of teenage boys walks into a retail store, and an officer is 25ft from their presence. They run out of the store carrying electronics. The worker from the store shouts for someone to help them. The officer runs after the juveniles and he/she has the right to make a warrantless arrest on behalf of theft of property, which can result in a fine or time in jail.

So your answer wouldv’e been false.

True. Extortion of public officials is indeed called "extortion under color of official right."

"Extortion under color of official right" refers to the act of public officials unlawfully obtaining property or money from others by exploiting their position and authority. This term is commonly used in legal contexts to describe situations where public officials abuse their power to demand bribes, kickbacks, or other forms of illicit benefits in exchange for performing their official duties or granting favors. It is a form of corruption that involves the misuse of public office for personal gain. Therefore, it is accurate to state that the extortion of public officials is referred to as "extortion under color of official right."

Learn more about extortion here:

https://brainly.com/question/15286343

#SPJ11

In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:

Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.

Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.

Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.

Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.

Know more about oligopoly here:

https://brainly.com/question/29518761

#SPJ8

Congress' ability to pass laws needed to carry out its expressed powers is known as the "necessary and proper" clause.

The necessary and proper clause is found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the authority to make all laws that are necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers specifically enumerated to it.

The exact wording of the clause states that Congress has the power "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

The purpose of the necessary and proper clause is to provide Congress with the flexibility and authority to pass legislation beyond its expressly listed powers, as long as it is necessary and proper for the functioning and execution of those powers.

It serves as a constitutional basis for implied powers, allowing Congress to legislate on matters that may not be explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but are closely related to its enumerated powers.

The necessary and proper clause has been interpreted broadly by the courts, expanding Congress' authority to pass laws that enable the effective exercise of its express powers.

For such more question on laws:

https://brainly.com/question/30037866

#SPJ8

Answer:

because they want to make like harder for us

A military personnel who leaked classified information to unauthorized person may be purnished with jail term up to ten years.

Classified Information are information owned by either the goverment or an organisation whos content are not supposed to be given out to parties outside that organisation.

At the Bottom of a typical Classified documented it is usually stated "RESTRICTED"

Learn more about Classified Information here:

https://brainly.com/question/25775920

Answer:

A. A higher exchange rate for the country's currency can lead to more

favorable terms of trade

Explanation:

Just got it right!

The exchange rate of a nation's currency affects the trading terms in such a way that the greater exchange rate leads to favorable trade between countries.

Option A is the correct answer.

Trading is the acquisition or disposal of goods or services by the countries with the outside countries.

The exchange rate is the rate that is used to convert the value of one currency into the value of the foreign currency. If the rate is higher, then the trading between the countries is more favorable whereas the trading becomes unfavorable if the rate is lower.

Therefore, the higher rate of exchange provides favorable trade which considers one of the effects of the exchange rate over trade.

Learn more about the exchange rate in the related link:

https://brainly.com/question/13717814

#SPJ2

Shay's Rebellion was a protest by Massachusetts farmers in 1786-1787 against foreclosures by state courts. (C)

Led by Daniel Shays, the rebellion was a response to the economic and political instability of the post-Revolutionary War period, which saw high taxes and indebtedness for many farmers. The farmers, who were mostly former soldiers, demanded relief from debt and taxes, as well as the suspension of court proceedings against debtors.

The rebellion was eventually put down by state and federal troops, and its leaders were arrested and tried for treason.

Shay's Rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which lacked a strong central government and the ability to maintain order. It contributed to the call for a stronger federal government and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution in 1787.

To know more about Shay's Rebellion click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/19692099#

#SPJ11

Answer: Regulatory Agencies.

Explanation:

Regulatory Agencies. Regulatory agencies are government entities that create and enforce rules and regulations that organizations must follow. These agencies are responsible for ensuring that organizations comply with laws and regulations and protect the public from potentially harmful activities. Examples of regulatory agencies include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Federal agencies that establish ground rules under which organizations operate are called regulatory agencies.

Regulatory agencies are responsible for creating and enforcing regulations to protect the public and ensure that organizations are operating in a safe and ethical manner.

These agencies are typically created by Congress and are overseen by the executive branch of the government.

Examples of regulatory agencies include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Each of these agencies has the authority to create and enforce regulations within their specific area of jurisdiction.

For more similar questions on Federal agencies:

brainly.com/question/27286349

#SPJ11

Organizations are required to upgrade policies and procedures so that data is protected the following statements are true in relation to General Data Protection Regulation GDPR. The correct option is 3.

The GDPR requires organizations to update their policies and procedures to ensure data protection. The rule lays out a number of requirements for organizations, among them taking the proper organizational and technical steps to protect the security of personal data. Protection against data breaches and unauthorized access could entail updating policies, procedures, and security measures.

Thus, the ideal selection is option 3.

Learn more about General Data Protection Regulation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30395765

#SPJ1

Your Question seems incomplete most probably your complete question was:

Which of the following statements are true in relation to the gdpr?

1 if an organization doesn't charge for goods or services, they don't need to comply.

2 every organization is required to have a data protection officer.

3. organization are required to upgrade policies and procedures so that data is protected

Answer:

women’s rights and discrimination based on gender

Explanation:

a bunch of articles will pop up if you look it up online

In Louisiana, usufruct is not automatic, and it can be dispensed with in a will. Usufruct is a right granted by one party to another to use a specific piece of property.

It is a non-ownership interest that entitles the usufructuary to enjoy the benefits and advantages of a property that belongs to another. The usufructuary's right to use the property continues for a specified time or until the occurrence of a specific event.There are different types of usufruct, including voluntary, legal, and conventional usufruct. Voluntary usufruct occurs when a property owner grants a usufructuary the right to use a piece of property. Legal usufruct is established by law and provides specific rights and restrictions on the usufructuary. Conventional usufruct is a result of a contract between parties, which outlines the terms and conditions of the usufruct.In Louisiana, the right of usufruct is not automatic, and it can be dispensed with in a will.

This means that a testator can choose to exclude a usufructuary's rights in a will. If a testator decides to include a usufruct in a will, they must make it clear which assets the usufruct applies to and the terms and conditions of the usufruct. Therefore, usufruct is not automatic in Louisiana, and it can be dispensed with in a will.

To know more about Louisiana click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29760168

#SPJ11