What process transports blood back and forth
between the heart and lungs?
pulmonary circulation
systemic circulation
metabolism
respiration
DONE

If A known car dealership had 3 new models stolen. Investigators want to know if it has a one time crime or if there has been similar ones in surrounding counties. What FBI report would be MOST helpful in this instance is: A NIBRS.

NIBRS which full meaning is National Incident-Based Reporting System  can be defined as the agency whose sole roles and responsibility is to  collect  detailed  information or data on every crime incident.

Based on the  given scenario NIBRS is the report that would be MOST helpful in this instance since the Investigators want to know if it has a one time crime or if there has been similar ones in surrounding counties.

Therefore If A known car dealership had 3 new models stolen. Investigators want to know if it has a one time crime or if there has been similar ones in surrounding counties. What FBI report would be MOST helpful in this instance is: A NIBRS.

The missing options are

A NIBRS

B. Hate Crime Studies

C. LEOKA

D. National Crime Victimization Survey

Learn more about NIBRS here:https://brainly.com/question/17448985

#SPJ1

Answer:

its a good question.

if you look at wiki definition (well its not necessiailty a source of truth, but it refers largely wat a typical person thinks).....terrorism is defined as use of violence to achieve ones' political goal, which is not really different from activism.

i guess the easy answer is that terrorism is a violent act against the traditional social value; whereas activism is a fight, sometimes violent, against what the society considers as unjustice.

if you want a more thoughtful answer, you can add that sometimes one's definition of activism can be considered as terrorsim by a different person, because different ppl in the society have different social value and priority.

say if some self acclaimed activists run riot on the street, some ppl would consider them as activists; but if you are a store owner who dont agree with their view, their act is an act of terror.

Explanation:

It is false that American businesses enthusiastically adopted internet privacy provisions identical to those adopted in the European data privacy directive.

We need a more specific definition of "privacy" in order to apply it in a computer system. When and under what circumstances to disclose personal information must be determined. We must choose specifically whether to permit anonymous transactions and when to demand accountability. Technology can, to a significant extent, accommodate each group if there are subgroups in society or countries with different beliefs about the solutions to these problems. One privacy regime does not necessary have to exist. Less regulation and more user choice are now possible because to technology, which can offer each user controls that are tailored to their preferred level of privacy and accessibility.

The first section of this paper explains how responsibility and anonymity can be harmonized to maximize user control.

To know more about society click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12006768

#SPJ4

Hello. You forgot and put the graph to which this question refers. The chart is attached below:

Answer:

42.354%

Explanation:

To answer this question it is necessary to make a very simple calculation that relates the total number of judgments by jury to the number of civil cases judged by juris. In this case, you must analyze the last line of the graph and use the following values in the calculation.

5082 ---- 100%

2154 ----- x

x = (2154 * 100) / 5082

x = 42.354%

It is True that when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was formed in 1970, environmental policy was indeed a polarizing issue, pitting Democrats against Republicans.

The 1960s and early 1970s were marked by growing public concern about environmental issues, including pollution, toxic waste, and the depletion of natural resources.

This concern was fueled in part by high-profile environmental disasters, such as the 1969 oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara, California, and the 1970 fire on the Cuyahoga River in Ohio, which was so polluted that it caught fire.

While many Democrats were pushing for stronger environmental protections, Republicans were generally more skeptical of government intervention in the private sector.

This divide was reflected in Congress, where environmental legislation was often fiercely contested along party lines. For example, the Clean Air Act of 1970 passed with the support of only 60% of Republicans in the House and Senate, compared to 84% of Democrats.

In this context, the creation of the EPA was seen as a major victory for environmental advocates, as it signaled a commitment on the part of the federal government to address pressing environmental issues.

However, the agency's work has continued to be contentious, with Republicans generally favoring less regulation and more industry-friendly policies, while Democrats tend to push for more robust environmental protections.

For more question on "Environmental Protection Agency" :

https://brainly.com/question/14956213

#SPJ11

Answer:

this is what I found online:

"Element Identification is a helpful skill to decide what action is needed…… (IE levels of research via sources and or investigation.) By taking each legal situation and breaking. From this point you may begin identifying the. legal issue of the complaint/case."

Correct options regarding the requirements for a substantive due process are Option 1 ( a legitimate governmental purpose if a non-fundamental right is involved )and Option 2 (a compelling governmental interest if a fundamental right is involved).

Substantive due process is a legal principle that requires the government to justify its actions when they interfere with an individual's life, liberty, or property. It involves a balancing of individual rights and government interests, and it is applied differently depending on whether a fundamental or non-fundamental right is at stake.

1. When a non-fundamental right is involved, substantive due process requires that the government have a legitimate governmental purpose for its action. This means that the government must demonstrate that its action is rationally related to a legitimate government interest, such as public health, safety, or welfare. For example, if the government seeks to regulate a business practice that does not implicate a fundamental right, it must show that the regulation is reasonably related to a legitimate governmental interest.

2. When a fundamental right is involved, substantive due process requires that the government have a compelling governmental interest for its action. This means that the government must demonstrate that its action is necessary to achieve a compelling state interest, such as protecting the right to vote or the right to privacy. For example, if the government seeks to restrict an individual's right to free speech, it must show that the restriction is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest.

Regarding the third answer choice, preemption is a legal principle that applies when federal law conflicts with state law. If the federal government has already regulated a particular area or issue, then state attempts to regulate in the same area may be preempted by federal law. For example, if the federal government has already regulated the content of television and radio broadcasts, then states may not be able to pass laws that conflict with federal regulations in that area.

To know more about substantive due process,click here: https://brainly.com/question/30562013

#SPJ4

The correct answer is (c) court decision. As a judge, Bonnie applies common law rules developed from court decisions.

Common law is a legal system based on judicial decisions rather than written laws or statutes. In this system, judges play a crucial role in shaping the law through their decisions in individual cases. As a judge, Bonnie applies the common law principles that have been established through previous court cases.

These principles are considered binding precedents, meaning that subsequent judges must follow them when making decisions in similar cases. Over time, a body of law develops from these court decisions, which guides judges in future cases. In this way, the common law system allows the law to adapt and evolve to meet the changing needs of society rather than being limited to the fixed provisions of statutes or regulations.

To learn more about common law, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/13070537

#SPJ4

Answer:C

Explanation:people living in the Midwest and the south mostly vote democratic

Answer:

Florida law only permitted counsel of poor defendants charged with capital offenses. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition was denied.

Explanation:

Gideon v. Wainright

Supreme Court ruled that the 6th amendment's guarantee of counsel corresponds with the 14th amendment (made obligatory) by the states. In other words, the 6th amendment guarantees the defendant the right to the assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings. Finally, the states had to provide counsel.

Answer:

The father of the Uhuru Kenyatta was Jomo Kenyatta.

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it is getting very close to accepting.

Answer:

a. Bargain collectively with their employer through their representative.

Explanation:

As an employee of the company and a member of the union of the company's employees, Mica has certain rights that prioritize his interests over that of the company. It also ensures that he, along with the others, have the right to oppose any mistreatment by the company.

Under federal law, Mica and his other union members have the right to bargain with their employer through their representatives. This is their right under the federal law, which not even the Natural Gas Company can ignore or declare void or baseless.

Thus, the correct answer is option a.  

Based on law, and standard regulations, the Privacy Policy is the legal document that discloses some or all of the ways the website gather, uses, discloses, and manages your data.

Privacy Policy is a term that is used to describe the statement or legal document (in privacy law) that divulges some or all of the ways a party gathers, uses, discloses, and manages a customer or client's data.

Generally, Privacy Policies are used on the website and sometimes placed under the Terms and Conditions of the website. It is the document that describes how the information provided by the user would be utilized.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is the Privacy Policy.

Learn more about the Privacy Policy here: https://brainly.com/question/13141069

#SPJ1

The Indiana Rules of Court consist of two main sets of rules: the Rules of Trial Procedure and the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

1. In general, trial procedure rules and appellate procedure rules may share some commonalities, such as:

2. Regarding the differences between trial procedure rules and appellate procedure rules, here are three potential distinctions:

Regarding the organization of both sets of rules, they are typically structured in a logical manner to provide clarity and ease of reference for legal practitioners. The rules are usually organized into various sections, with each section addressing a particular aspect of the court proceedings.

The organization may follow a hierarchical structure, starting with general provisions and then delving into more specific rules for different stages of the process.

Whether the organization of the rules was intentional or not can be subjective. However, it is generally expected that court rules are organized in a systematic manner to facilitate ease of use and interpretation.

By arranging the rules in a logical order, it helps legal professionals navigate the complex procedural requirements and find the relevant provisions more efficiently. The intentional organization of rules also promotes consistency and uniformity in the application of the law, reducing confusion and promoting fairness within the legal system.

Know more about Appellate Procedure here:

https://brainly.com/question/22598788

#SPJ8

The statement is false.

Under Florida public records law, an unsolicited proposal can be exempt from disclosure for a limited period, but the specific timeframes mentioned in the statement are not accurate. Here's a breakdown of the correct provisions:

Exemption Period: An unsolicited proposal submitted to a responsible public entity can be exempt from public records disclosure for a period of 30 days after the date of the entity's receipt of the proposal. During this time, the entity evaluates the proposal's feasibility, utility, or potential for the public's interest.

Competitive Solicitation: If the responsible public entity decides not to initiate a competitive solicitation for the project described in the unsolicited proposal, the exemption can be extended for an additional period. The unsolicited proposal remains exempt for 90 days from the initial notice issued by the entity, which must reject all proposals. This additional exemption period allows the entity to explore the potential for competitive solicitation or alternative procurement methods.

It's important to note that after the exemption period expires, the unsolicited proposal becomes subject to public records disclosure unless other exemptions or protections apply.

To ensure accurate information regarding Florida's public records law and its specific provisions, it is advisable to consult the relevant statutes or consult legal professionals familiar with Florida law.

To know more about, unsolicited proposals click here:https://brainly.com/question/30053310

#SPJ11

Answer:

Lack of a national court system in the country means there would be absence of fair hearing. Absence of court system means there will be lots of abuse of power and lawlessness.

The legal system exists in order to serve justice and to protect the rights of the people.

The legal system is there to serve justice and protect the rights of citizens. It is not necessarily intended to enforce a particular moral code, although laws and regulations may reflect certain moral or ethical principles.

The legal system is designed to maintain order and fairness in society by resolving disputes and upholding the rights and freedoms of citizens, as established by the constitution and other laws. It is expected to be neutral and impartial in its application, and judges are trained to apply the law objectively, regardless of personal beliefs or opinions.

Read more on the legal system here: https://brainly.com/question/30307656

#SPJ1

The rationale that looks at how close defendants came to completing their crimes is called "attempt" in criminal law.

An attempt is a crime in which a person intends to commit a crime and takes a significant step toward completing it but fails to complete it. The rationale behind attempting the crime is based on how close defendants came to completing their crimes.

An attempt is defined as an offense in which the defendant attempts to commit a crime and takes substantial steps toward completing it but fails to complete it. Attempted crimes are punishable under criminal law with a sentence of imprisonment or other penalties such as fines or probation.

An attempt is determined by analyzing the defendant's conduct in the case. A person cannot be guilty of an attempted crime if he or she has not committed a crime or has not made any significant attempt to commit the crime.

You can learn more about criminal law at: https://brainly.com/question/32272183

#SPJ11

Q1. Appeals refer to the legal process by which a higher court reviews a decision made by a lower court. The purpose of an appeal is to seek a direct answer or clarification regarding a specific legal issue or to challenge the lower court's decision.

As for the time allowed for appeals in Alberta, it depends on the specific case and the court involved. The time frame for filing an appeal can vary, so it is essential to consult with a legal professional or research the specific rules and regulations for the particular court in question.

Q2. The choice between negotiation and filing a suit as a dispute resolution strategy depends on the specific circumstances of the dispute.

Negotiation involves the parties discussing and attempting to reach a mutually agreeable solution without involving a court. This strategy can be more cost-effective, less time-consuming, and may help maintain a better relationship between the parties involved. It allows for flexibility and the possibility of finding a compromise.

On the other hand, filing a suit involves initiating a formal legal process through the court system. This strategy may be more appropriate when negotiations have failed or when there is a need for a direct answer from the court to resolve the dispute. Filing a suit can be a lengthier and more expensive process compared to negotiation.

Ultimately, the choice between negotiation and filing a suit depends on factors such as the nature of the dispute, the desired outcome, the relationship between the parties, and the legal advice received. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional to determine the most suitable dispute resolution strategy for a specific situation.

To know more about Higher court, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33447797

#SPJ11

Answer:

job availability

Explanation:

many people that went in prison have difficulty finding Employment and the majority 70% felt that criminal records have effect on their job search 2 months of the been released 40% of respondents have been employed at some point since leaving prison but only 31% were currently employed.

one study found that that white job applicants with a criminal record are of half likely to be called back for an interview black applicants are less likely to be called back in general but those with a record called back on your third as often as peers.

also background checks go back 7 years different type of background checks look different results and cover different lengths of time in Canadian personal history in general background checks that typically cover 7 years of Criminal and court records but can't go back any further depending on complication and laws of what's been searched.

Answer:

job availabolty

Explanation:

trust am a Hardvard student

I'll like to do an undercover work.

The skills that are important include a required educational level, intelligence and problem solving skills.

The person that I think that could do that job is my brother as he loves solving puzzles.

Undercover operations are investigations in which investigators infiltrate criminal networks or pose as offenders in order to uncover organized crime activity. Undercover police work entails the use of deception by a police agent in order to obtain information and evidence that can be used to build a criminal case against those targeted by the undercover activity.

To become an undercover cop, you must first be hired as a police officer, gain several years of experience, and advance through the ranks. A high school diploma is required at the very least, but some police departments prefer candidates with some college experience or a degree in criminal justice.

Learn more about undercover on:

https://brainly.com/question/15021742

#SPJ1

A legal document that the Supreme Court sends to a lower court ordering it to send up a complete record of a case is called a "writ of certiorari."

This writ is issued by the Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower court, ensuring that the case was handled correctly and the judgment was just.

The process is:
1. A party involved in a case requests the Supreme Court to review the lower court's decision by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari.
2. The Supreme Court reviews the petition and decides whether to grant it or not. The Court typically only accepts cases that involve significant legal issues or inconsistencies among different lower courts.
3. If the Supreme Court grants the writ of certiorari, it orders the lower court to send up the complete record of the case.
4. The lower court complies with the order and sends the case record to the Supreme Court.
5. The Supreme Court then reviews the case, hears arguments from both sides and makes a final decision.

This process ensures that the Supreme Court can maintain consistency and fairness in the application of laws throughout the country.

Know more about the supreme court here:

https://brainly.com/question/25903338

#SPJ11

A US District Court decision may NOT be cited as a primary source of tax law. A US District Court decision is not a primary source of tax law. Question 5: FUTA is the tax that is NOT paid by wage earners.

A primary source of tax law is a statute or regulation that contains the law on a specific topic. US District Court decisions are secondary sources that interpret primary sources such as statutes and regulations. Temporary Treasury Regulation, Revenue Ruling, Technical Advice Memorandum, and Tax Treaty with Canada can be cited as primary sources of tax law.

These are regulations and official interpretations of the law that are published by the government and carry the force of law. The Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) is a tax imposed on employers that funds state and federal unemployment insurance programs. Wage earners do not pay this tax. FICA tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and Income tax are taxes that are paid by wage earners.

You can learn more about US District Court at: brainly.com/question/29887517

#SPJ11

Answer:

ummmmmm, u ok????......