Answer:
Clarence Earl Gideon was a career criminal whose actions helped change the American legal system. Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. In a landmark legal decision, Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that under the U.S. Constitution, state courts are required to appoint lawyers for those individuals accused of committing a crime who cannot pay for legal representation.
Explanation:
Because of Gideon's efforts, thousands of individuals who had been tried and convicted without legal representation were granted new trials or released from Florida prisons. Over time, the right to legal representation for impoverished individuals has been extended to include juvenile offenders and adults who commit misdemeanors.
When Clarence Earl Gideon picked up a pencil to write his petition to the U.S. Supreme Court, he set a series of events in motion that changed the nation's legal system, proving that sometimes one person can make an important difference.
Gideon, different from the thousands of other criminal defendants, as his actions helped change the American legal system.
Who was Gideon?Clarence Earl Gideon was indeed a violent offender whose acts aided in the transformation of the American justice system. Gideon has been accused of robbery, but could not afford to hire an attorney to reflect him in court.
Gideon brought his case to the United States after being convicted guilty and subjected to five years in prison.
Thousands of people who had been prosecuted and sentenced without legal counsel were permitted new trials or freed from Florida prisons as a result of Gideon's work. Over time, the right of destitute people to legal counsel has been expanded to cover young offenders and adults who commit offenses.
Clarence Earl Gideon took up a pencil to begin writing his plea to the U.S. He put in motion a chain of events that reshaped the nation's judicial system, demonstrating that one individual may occasionally make a significant difference.
Therefore, it can be concluded that Gideon helped to develop the legal system.
Learn more about Gideon here:
https://brainly.com/question/20791026
#SPJ2
which of the following is not a recognized defense to liability under the equal pay act?
The following is not a recognized defense to liability under the equal pay act: "business necessity.
Explanation:Equal Pay Act (EPA) is a US labor law that prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of sex by paying employees of one sex less than employees of the other sex for the same work.It requires that all employees in an establishment performing substantially equal work be given equal pay. The EPA is a strict liability law, meaning that no proof of intent to discriminate is required; it is sufficient to show that the employer pays different wages to employees of the opposite sex for the same job.
The EPA makes it illegal to discriminate against employees on the basis of gender in terms of pay. The law covers virtually all employers, including federal, state, and local governments. In terms of defenses to liability, the following defenses are recognized under the EPA:the seniority systemthe merit systemthe quantity or quality of productionany factor other than sexBusiness necessity is not a recognized defense to liability under the EPA.
to know more about liability visit
https://brainly.com/question/33525831
#SPJ11
What can the government do to help promote the concept of private property?
Answer:
By introducing the private ownership type of economic system.
Explanation:
Since the system is based on capitalist form of running.
Explanation:
i hope u can understand this
Which unit of the military has 90% failure rate for their training recruits ?
Answer:
The Special Air Service
Explanation:
The Special Air Service is a very well-equipped, admired and elitist special forces regiment. This regiment represents the elite of the special forces and is coveted by hundreds of military personnel around the world.
The work in this regiment is very thorough, important and well structured. This allows for a very well established career plan, promoting a dynamic, challenging and rewarding job. The challenging element still begins in the selection process, which has a high level of difficulty with a failure rate of 90%.
Joshua is at rank E2 in the Marine Corps. Which of the given statements is true for him? A. He belongs to a junior enlisted rank. B. He is a warrant officer. C. He is a commissioned officer. D. He is a noncommissioned officer.
Answer:
The answer is A.
the clayton act was enacted in 1914 to strengthen the antitrust laws under the sherman act. true/false
The statement that 'the Clayton Act was enacted in 1914 to strengthen the antitrust laws under the Sherman Act' is true. It complemented the Sherman Act by providing a more comprehensive framework to address anticompetitive practices.
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 is a United States antitrust law that regulates competition and monopolies. It is named after Senator William Alden Smith and Representative Henry De Lamar Clayton, who were the act's authors. It bans monopolistic behaviour, price fixing, and exclusive dealings and ties. It made illegal a variety of business activities that the Supreme Court had previously stated were not covered by the Sherman Antitrust Act.
The Clayton Act also stipulated that businesses could not acquire the stock of competing corporations if doing so would result in reduced competition. It stipulated that if a company's merger or acquisition activity would "substantially lessen competition," the government had the authority to halt the activity.
Hence, the Clayton Act aimed to prevent specific business practices that could potentially lead to a reduction in competition, such as price discrimination, exclusive dealing agreements, and corporate mergers that could lessen competition. Thus, the statement is true.
Learn more about Clayton Antitrust Act:
https://brainly.com/question/14684775
#SPJ11
congress taking over the state regulation of warnings on cigarette packages is an example of
Congress taking over the state regulation of warnings on cigarette packages is an example of preemption.
Preemption refers to a situation where federal law supersedes state law, making the state law invalid or unenforceable in a particular area. In this case, Congress passed a federal law that required cigarette packages to carry specific warning labels, which preempted any state laws that conflicted with or imposed additional requirements beyond the federal law.
Federal preemption is a mechanism to maintain national standards and address issues that involve interstate commerce, where a uniform approach is deemed necessary or beneficial. In the case of cigarette warnings, it allows for a comprehensive and consistent message about the health risks of smoking to be conveyed to consumers regardless of the state they are in.
To know more about preemption, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11422283
#SPJ11
There were no full time, paid firefighters until mid-19th century. Today, 30% of the nation’s over one million firefighters are paid and 70% receive little or no payment. Why do you think the percentages are so much greater for volunteer firefighters? In no less than 150 words.
Answer:
The predominance of volunteer firefighters in the United States can be attributed to several factors. First and foremost, firefighting has a strong tradition of community service and volunteerism, with many individuals motivated by a desire to help their neighbors and protect their communities. In many rural areas and small towns, volunteer firefighters are often the only available option due to limited budgets and resources.
Additionally, volunteer firefighting departments are often deeply embedded in their communities, with members serving for years or even decades. This longevity fosters a strong sense of camaraderie and loyalty among members, and can create a tight-knit team that is highly motivated to work together to achieve their goals.
Finally, the cost of maintaining a paid firefighting force can be prohibitive for many communities, particularly in rural areas or smaller towns. Volunteer firefighters provide an important cost-effective alternative, allowing communities to provide essential firefighting services while keeping costs under control.
While paid firefighters are an important part of many larger urban areas, volunteer firefighting departments continue to play a vital role in protecting communities across the country. Their dedication, commitment, and willingness to serve provide a critical resource for ensuring public safety and protecting property.
Explanation:
The Constitution limits the executive branch from declaring war by giving that power to
the judicial branch.
the legislative branch.
the leader of the Senate.
the leader of the House.
Answer: The Legislative branch
Explanation: Just trust me bro
Answer: The answer is:
B: the legislative branch.
Explanation:
Edge 2023
Hope :}
Don't trust random people on the internet.
a dna technical leader in a public crime lab is responsible for
The DNA technical leader in a public crime lab plays a vital role in ensuring the integrity, accuracy, and scientific validity of DNA analysis.
A DNA technical leader in a public crime lab is responsible for several key tasks related to DNA analysis and forensic science. These responsibilities include:
Overseeing DNA Analysis: The DNA technical leader is responsible for overseeing and coordinating DNA analysis activities in the crime lab. They ensure that proper protocols and procedures are followed during the processing and analysis of DNA samples.
Quality Assurance: The technical leader plays a crucial role in maintaining the quality and accuracy of DNA analysis within the lab. They develop and implement quality control measures to ensure that the lab's processes and results meet established standards and adhere to forensic best practices.
Training and Supervision: The technical leader provides guidance, training, and supervision to DNA analysts and technicians in the lab. They ensure that staff members are properly trained on laboratory techniques, equipment usage, and data interpretation, fostering a skilled and competent workforce.
Case Review and Interpretation: The DNA technical leader participates in the review and interpretation of DNA test results obtained from forensic samples. They analyze and interpret complex DNA profiles, compare them to reference samples, and assist in the formulation of conclusions related to forensic investigations.
Expert Testimony: In legal proceedings, the technical leader may be called upon to provide expert testimony regarding DNA analysis and interpretation. They may explain the laboratory procedures followed, the significance of DNA evidence, and the reliability of the results obtained to assist the court in understanding the scientific aspects of the case.
Research and Development: The technical leader may engage in research and development activities to improve DNA analysis techniques, stay updated with advancements in the field, and contribute to the scientific knowledge and methodologies used in forensic DNA analysis.
Collaboration and Communication: The technical leader interacts with other forensic experts, law enforcement agencies, attorneys, and stakeholders involved in criminal investigations. They collaborate and communicate effectively to provide accurate and reliable DNA analysis results and assist in the interpretation and application of DNA evidence in criminal cases.
Overall, the DNA technical leader in a public crime lab plays a vital role in ensuring the integrity, accuracy, and scientific validity of DNA analysis. Their responsibilities encompass various aspects of DNA testing, quality assurance, staff supervision, case review, and collaboration to support the effective application of DNA evidence in criminal investigations and legal proceedings.
Learn more about DNA here
https://brainly.com/question/28406985
#SPJ11
The philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed that society has a corrupting influence on a people and that it was the government's responsibility to protect the people from the ills of society by making laws that benefit the general population. Do you agree with Rousseau? Why or why not? Explain.
Describe the negative impact of failing to acknowledge unity diversity
Answer:
Explanation:
Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can have several negative impacts on individuals, communities, and societies:
Divisions and Conflict: Ignoring or neglecting the value of unity in diversity can lead to divisions and conflicts within society. When differences are not acknowledged and respected, it can result in prejudice, discrimination, and social tension. This can create an environment of hostility and hinder social cohesion.
Marginalization and Exclusion: Without recognizing and embracing diversity, certain groups or individuals may be marginalized or excluded. This can lead to unequal access to opportunities, resources, and rights. Marginalized groups may face discrimination, stigmatization, and limited participation in social, economic, and political spheres.
Lack of Representation and Voice: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can result in the underrepresentation of certain groups in decision-making processes and institutions. This lack of representation can lead to a distortion of perspectives and interests, excluding diverse voices from shaping policies and initiatives that affect them.
Missed Opportunities for Innovation and Growth: Diversity brings different perspectives, experiences, and ideas to the table. When unity in diversity is not recognized, these valuable contributions may be overlooked or dismissed. This can limit the potential for innovation, creativity, and problem-solving. Embracing diversity, on the other hand, can foster innovation and lead to broader perspectives in various fields.
Social Injustice and Inequality: Failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can perpetuate social injustice and inequality. It can reinforce existing power structures and systems that disadvantage certain groups based on their identity. This can hinder social progress, hinder equal opportunities, and contribute to persistent disparities in education, employment, healthcare, and other domains.
Cultural Erosion and Loss: Neglecting diversity can result in the erosion and loss of cultural traditions, practices, and knowledge. Cultural diversity enriches societies by providing a variety of cultural expressions, languages, and perspectives. When unity in diversity is not acknowledged, cultural homogenization may occur, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and identity.
Overall, failing to acknowledge unity in diversity can lead to divisions, inequalities, and missed opportunities. Recognizing and embracing diversity is essential for fostering inclusive and harmonious societies that value and respect the contributions and rights of all individuals and groups.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
This can give rise to various social tensions between different states and people of linguistic origin. It causes corruption and illiteracy in many areas of the country. Due to underdeveloped infrastructure, power shortage, roads etc.
What effect do you think the limitation of free speech has on American democracy today?
Answer:
we should speak what we want when we want
God gave us a mouth for a reason might as well use it
Explanation:
Answer:
It allows people to say anything they wish to say at any time. It helps people make the best choices on public issues.
Explanation:
For a violation of the Texas stalking statute (Sec. 42.072) to occur, the offender's conduct must:
Under Texas stalking statute (Sec. 42.072), the offender's conduct must meet the following criteria for a violation to occur: engage in conduct that causes another person to feel harassed, alarmed, or annoyed, directed at a specific person, occur on more than one occasion, cause the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened.
1. Engage in conduct that the person knows or reasonably should know would cause another person to feel harassed, alarmed, or annoyed.
2. The conduct must be directed specifically at another person.
3. The conduct must occur on more than one occasion and
4. The conduct must cause the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, or threatened.
If all of these criteria are met, the offender may be charged with stalking under Texas law. It's important to note that stalking is a serious crime that can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment, fines, and probation.
To know more about stalking here:
https://brainly.com/question/30904382
#SPJ4
In order to affect laws, the Supreme Court must
A. Create and pass a law
B. Order the President to write and opinion
C. Write and opinion regarding a court case
D. Issue a general proclamation
Answer:
A create and pass a law
Explanation:
So what you want to do every question is take out the ones that dont make sence. Then you need to look what did you go over. Then you can start to get ride of answer if you aren't sure.
I hoped this helps you have a nice day!!
What does the term posterity mean
Answer: D all future generations
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is D.
Explanation:
i hope this helps. Dont now how to explain it but know this is the correct answer.
a grand jury indictment must rest on evidence indicating a __________ case against the defendant.
A grand jury indictment must rest on evidence indicating a prima facie case against the defendant.
The Latin phrase "prima facie" means "at first glance" or "based on first impression." Using the feminine forms of primus ('first') and facies ('face'), both in the ablative case, the literal translation would be 'at first face' or 'at first appearance'.
"On the face of it" is a popular translation in contemporary, conversational, and informal English. The phrase "prima facie" refers to the initial appearance of adequate corroboration of a claim to sustain it in modern legal English, which includes both civil law and criminal law.
Learn more about prima facie here:
https://brainly.com/question/32222408
#SPJ1
How might alcohol and drugs affect a person's weight?
A. They don't generally affect a person's weight.
B. Both alcohol and drugs can cause weight gain.
C. Alcohol can cause weight gain, and drugs can cause weight loss.
The Department of Motor Vehicles can suspend the license of any person
A. 12 or more points within one year.
Alcohol and drugs affect a person's weight. Both alcohol and drugs can cause weight gain. Hence, option B is appropriate.
What are Drugs?Drugs are compounds or chemicals that alter how our bodies function. When prescribed by doctors, some are medications that aid patients. Many are not beneficial medically. Abused substances enter the bloodstream when consumed (often by ingesting, inhaling, or injecting).
In pharmacology, a drug is indeed a chemical compound, usually one with a well-known structure, that, when given to a living thing, has a biological impact.
In the past, medications were extracted from medicinal herbs, but much more recently, they were also created organically.
Hence, option B is correct.
Learn more about Drugs here:
https://brainly.com/question/13294633
#SPJ1
Jim crow laws, a set of racist and discriminatory rules and regulations against african americans, were enacted in the south starting in the mid- to late 1800s. In the south starting in the early 1800s nationwide starting in the mid- to late 1800s. Nationwide starting in the early 1800s.
State and local regulations known as the "Jim Crow laws" made racial segregation legal.
The laws, which were named after a Black minstrel show figure, were intended to marginalize African Americans by denying them the right to vote, hold jobs, receive an education, or have other possibilities. They were in place for about 100 years, from the post-Civil War era until 1968. Jim Crow laws frequently resulted in arrests, fines, jail terms, violence, and even death for anyone who tried to violate them.
Black codes were stringent local and state restrictions that outlined when, where, and how people who had formerly been in slavery might work, as well as how much they could be paid. The codes spread throughout the South as a legal means of enslaving Black people, removing their right to vote, controlling where they lived and traveled, and kidnapping children for labor.
The 13th Amendment, which ended slavery in the United States, was ratified in 1865, which is when the origins of Jim Crow legislation first appeared.
To learn more about Jim Crow laws from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/22549874
#SPJ4
Answer:
in the South starting in the mid- to late 1800s
Explanation:
edge 2023
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Brian is a handwriting analysis expert. Which two items does he need to detect forgery?
Brian needs
or legitimate writings from the person whose signature was forged. He also needs the
which are the suspected forgeries.
Answer:
Exemplars, tracings
Explanation:
We rlly active
why does a party file interrogatories
Answer:
to learn more detail about the other partys case
Explanation:
just took test and got it right
What power does the federal
government have to regulate the State of California and its residents?
The federal government has the power to regulate the state of California and its residents through the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.
What does the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution provide?This clause establishes that federal laws and regulations are the supreme law of the land, and states must abide by them. Additionally, the federal government also has the power to regulate certain activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
All these includes the power to regulate things like air and water pollution, and to enforce federal laws such as immigration laws and civil rights laws.
Read more about Supremacy Clause
brainly.com/question/386719
#SPJ1
mCours
days must register their vehidets).
Question 2:
Select the best answer from the multiple choices below
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than
29
03
13
30
300
were
Posto
mpleted
answered
answered
answered
answered
answered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
Unanswered
unanswered
21 answered
22. Unanswered
23 Unanswered
Suhant Exam for Crossing
Time remaining to complete exam in minutes): 180
wered
Answer:
It's 90 days but u don't have that a optionExplanation:
90 days
Anyone who uses a vehicle in Texas while residing or working in the state for more than 90 days must register their vehicles. If you are a new Texas resident, you are allowed to drive with your valid and unexpired licence from another U.S. state, U.S territory or a Canadian province for up to 90 days after moving here.
Answer: I don’t know how to answer this question
Explanation:
there is also no possible question, sorry
Lora files a suit in Michigan against Ned over the ownership of a boat docked in a Michigan harbor. Lora and Ned are residents of Ohio. Ned could ask for a change of venue on the ground that Ohio:
a. Has a sufficient stake in the matter
b. Has jurisdiction
c. Has sufficient minimum contacts with the parties
d. Is a more convenient location to hold the trial
b. Has jurisdiction. Under the doctrine of personal jurisdiction, a court has the power to make binding decisions on a person or entity if the person or entity has sufficient minimum contacts with the jurisdiction in which the court is located.
In this case, both Lora and Ned are residents of Ohio, which suggests that Ohio has personal jurisdiction over both of them. However, whether or not Ohio has jurisdiction over Ned's boat docked in a Michigan harbor is a different question. The question of jurisdiction over property is typically determined by the laws of the state where the property is located. Therefore, the court in Michigan may have jurisdiction over the ownership of the boat, while the court in Ohio may have jurisdiction over the dispute between Lora and Ned.
Learn more about jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/12448353
#SPJ4
which of the following are changes in campaign financing allowed by the supreme court ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission?
The changes in campaign financing allowed by the supreme court ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission include unlimited spending by corporations and labor unions on independent political advertisements.
The ruling removed restrictions on how much corporations and labor unions can spend on political campaigns. Previously, corporations and labor unions were prohibited from making direct contributions to political campaigns. However, they can now spend unlimited amounts on independent political advertisements, such as TV commercials and other media ads. These advertisements can support or oppose specific candidates, as long as they are not coordinated with the candidate's campaign.
The Citizens United ruling has been highly controversial, with many critics arguing that it has opened the door to the influence of big money in politics and made it easier for corporations and labor unions to buy political influence.
"Which of the following are changes in campaign financing allowed by the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission?
-Interest groups can spend unlimited funds on behalf of candidates so long as the efforts are not coordinated with a campaign.
-Citizens United helped curb the amount of "dark money" flowing in politics.
-Incumbents now have an opportunity to see which political donors oppose them for re-election."
To know more about labor unions go to
https://brainly.com/question/28872741
#SPJ4
Civil law is further divided into the categories of
Answer:
it can be divided into two.
substantive law and procedural law
Answer:
substantive law and procedural law
Explanation:
Some states in the u.s. have both medical examiners and coroner systems, not just one of the other.a. Trueb. False
Answer:
True :)
Explanation:
have great day
What is the purpose of statutory laws? *
A)They give executive agencies their power
B)They limit the power of government
C)They allow state legislations to make laws
D) They protect the right of the people
What is the legislation at issue?
The process of exercising the powers and functions, which are available in the hands of a body or an institution authorized by the government, is known as legislation.
What is the significance of legislation?For the purpose of passing of a legislation, it is important for someone to have an authority. A legislation can be passed, brought into effect, amended, modified or debarred by the bodies of a legislative assembly.
Hence, the significance of a legislation is aforementioned.
Learn more about legislation here:
https://brainly.com/question/782960
#SPJ1
Which accurately describes a push marketing tactic to help manufacturers sell more products?
O A manufacturer launches a new print advertising campaign in several magazines.
O A manufacturer incorporates social media to increase brand awareness.
O A manufacturer creates a new television advertising campaign.
O A manufacturer offers department stores incentives for selling its product.
When firms buy new capital, it is called
Question 42 options:
a)
depreciation.
b)
investment.
c)
convergence.
d)
marginal product.
e)
exogenous growth.
When firms buy new capital, it is called investment. Investment refers to the process of purchasing new capital goods or assets by firms.
This can include buying machinery, equipment, buildings, or any other long-term productive assets that are used in the production process. Investment is essential for firms to expand their production capacity, improve efficiency, and ultimately increase output. It is a crucial component of economic growth and development, as it contributes to the accumulation of productive capital in an economy.
By investing in new capital, firms aim to enhance their production capabilities and generate higher returns in the long run.
To know more about production capacity, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/33406741
#SPJ11