Answers
The term "then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition" refers to a specific aspect of the Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3). Rule 803(3) addresses an exception to the hearsay rule, allowing certain statements to be admitted as evidence even though they are hearsay.
In the context of Rule 803(3), a "then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition" is a statement made by a person that reflects their state of mind, emotions, or physical sensations at the time the statement was made. This exception is based on the idea that such statements are likely to be reliable because people generally speak truthfully about their immediate experiences and sensations.
For example, if a person said, "I'm scared" during an incident, that statement could be admitted as evidence to demonstrate the person's emotional state at the time. Similarly, a statement like "My leg hurts" could be used to establish a physical condition.
It's important to note that Rule 803(3) only applies to statements that describe a person's condition at the time the statement was made. Statements about future intentions or past events generally don't fall under this exception, as they are more likely to be influenced by external factors or personal biases.
In summary, the then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition under Rule 803(3) refers to a person's state of mind, emotions, or physical sensations at the time a statement was made, which can be used as an exception to the hearsay rule and admitted as evidence in legal proceedings.
Know more about Federal Rule of Evidence here:
https://brainly.com/question/10457384
#SPJ11
Related Questions
quuzlet In Arizona v. Fulminante, the Court ruled that the harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving admissibility of:
Answers
the Court ruled that the harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving admissibility of involuntary confessions.
What are involuntary confessions?An involuntary confession that results from overwhelming police behavior rather than the defendant's free will is referred to as a pressured confession. Because the confession was not the result of the accused's free will, it is involuntary.
What are first signs of involuntary celibacy?Being obese Being thought of being physically unappealing Never having been in a romantic relationshipDoes the harmless error doctrine apply to involuntary confessions?The Court decided in Fulminante that situations regarding the admissibility of involuntary confessions fall under the harmless error theory.
Is Fulminante's confession to Sarivola admissible in court?It is crucial to assess the admissibility of Fulminante's confession to Sarivola in light of the finding by five Justices that the harmless error analysis extends to coerced confessions. For example, see Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co., 491 U. S. 1, 45 (1989) (WHITE, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part).
Learn more about Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona:
https://brainly.com/question/3703825?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Your own thoughts about criminal justice system?
Answers
Answer:
The justice system does not respond to most crime because so much crime is not discovered or reported to the police. Law enforcement agencies learn about crime from the reports of victims or other citizens, from discovery by a police officer in the field, from informants, or from investigative and intelligence work.
Explanation:
CÁCH LÀM BÀI THU HOẠCH
Answers
Answer:
Bạn nên hỏi bằng Tiếng Anh ấy ạ. Sẽ có nhiều người dễ chỉ hơn ạ. Đa số người nước ngoài, hỏi Tiếng Việt họ không hiểu đâu ạ.
the which of the following Suggests that al
Solution to all social problems, including crime
traps formation of human beings, mutual deppe-
reduction of class structures. the Creats
ammunities of caring people and unie
Social Justice ?
A Radical theory
B British or left realism
C Peacemaking Crminology
D Femmist theory
Answers
Answer:
U bot
Explanation:
u suck at fortnite if u dont friend me and lets one v one
Benol9
Identify the act that expanded states' rights with regard to Internet surveillance technology, including workplace surveillance, and amended the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.A. USA PATRIOT ActB. Sarbanes-Oxley ActC. Federal Information Security Management ActD. Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
Answers
USA PATRIOT Act expanded states rights with regard to internet surveillance technology, including workplace surveillance, and amended the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) of 1986 is the collective name for the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Stored Wire Electronic Communications Act. The Federal Wiretap Act of 1968 was revised by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which did not cover intercepting computer and other digital and electronic communications but dealt with listening in on talks over "hard" telephone lines. A number of later pieces of legislation, such as The USA PATRIOT Act, update and clarify the ECPA in order to keep up with the development of new communications technologies and techniques. These later pieces of legislation also loosen restrictions on law enforcement's ability to access stored communications in some circumstances. As a result of the "U.S. Patriot Act," which updated the ECPA, law enforcement officials are now permitted to utilize search warrants to compel the revelation of voice mail that has been held with a third party provider.
To know more about Electronic Communications Privacy Act
https://brainly.com/question/27973081
#SPJ4
Any help with the beach movie question
Answers
Answer:
they are just set there
Explanation:
Refer to attachment
Professional ethics and the living
Answers
Since she is scare of donating her kidneys, I will go through the process with her again, tell her the pros and cons of the process and give her a lot of example of those who have undergone the process and are not scared. If after that she is still scared, i will advise her to do what she wants.
What are the response to the other cases?2. I will tell the Newspaper and the newsmen of the family's will and the matter should not be expanded and they should give the family some space and when all have been done. Their questions will be answered but for the moment they need to give the family some space.
3. Based on ethnics, i will advice the person on how the process it and it is not wise for the person to undergo it because he or she may face health challenges in future which may put his or her life in danger and if he or she is donating based on close family relation who needs it is a different case and money should not be a reason to sell your organ.
4. Since my friend wants to be a surrogate mother. I will link the both parties involved and explain the process to both parties.
5. I will explain the reason for the hospital behavior to the Wife and that her husband was not neglected and his case is still been handled.
6. Yes I am in agreement and will willingly submit to the test.
Learn more about Kidney donation from
https://brainly.com/question/15060409
#SPJ1
You are the city manager and the budget is tight. Your options are either to raise taxes and/or fees, cut programs and services, or raise taxes and cut services. Which do you choose? If you are going to cut services, which services do you cut? Once your decision is made, how do you sell your idea to the city council and the residents of your city that this is the best option?
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
As the city manager and knowing that the budget is tight, I would choose to raise taxes and cut programs. The programs I would choose would be the ones that have less impact in the medium to lower classes. I would establish the priorities of the government that clearly are the creation of jobs and health services. I would sell my idea to the city council and the residents of your city that this is the best option in that I would tell them that these are temporary measures while the economic situation could be transformed in 6 to 12 months. The government would save some money stopping unnecessary expenditure, and there will be some financial incentives to entrepreneurs and businessmen that decide to create new business in the city.
most states apply a legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff. This standard is known as the:
Answers
The legal standard that takes into account the degree of negligence on the part of both the defendant and the plaintiff is known as the comparative negligence.
This standard allows a court to allocate fault between the plaintiff and defendant and apportion damages accordingly. Under this standard, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. For example, if the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the damages are $100,000, the plaintiff would only be entitled to receive $70,000 (i.e. $100,000 minus 30%). Comparative negligence is used in most states in the United States, but the specific rules and guidelines vary from state to state.
Learn more about comparative negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/29829593
#SPJ11
When not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio
for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in
cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor
per 5 minors.
Answers
It is TRUE that the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.
What is the proper minors-supervisor ratio?In Philadelphia, the proper ratio for the supervision of minors is one supervisor for 5 minors.
However, in the remaining states, one supervisor can supervise up to twenty minors.
Thus, it is TRUE that when not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.
Learn more about the supervision of minors at https://brainly.com/question/23509933
#SPJ1
Which of the following options indicate the logical reasons to study Political Science
as a field in general, and American Government as a course in particular?
a) Government and politics impacts nearly every aspect of our lives.
b) For good career opportunities
c) Learning Politics and following it can be fun
d) All are good answers
Answers
The correct option is D. All good answers indicate the logical reasons to study Political Science.
Students who choose to major in political science will study both theory and practice of government as part of their social science education.
What is the purpose of studying this political science?Students who study political science gain a solid understanding of the value of political engagement and are better equipped to participate in local and national politics.
Students majoring in political science should be able to: Recognize and apply the techniques political scientists employ to address political concerns. To comprehend and evaluate competing hypotheses and interpretations, use critical thinking and evidence. Create and present in writing an argument that is well-organized and backed up by evidence.
Learn more about Political Science here:
https://brainly.com/question/1134073
#SPJ1
What is Advance directives?
Answers
Advance directives are documents with legal force that outline a person's preferences for medical care in the event that they are unable to speak for themselves, usually in the event of a serious sickness or accident. These
To advance is to go ahead, frequently with the intention of attacking someone. In the Allies started moving on the city. 5 cm of water are being added to the area every day. a photo showing a guy jumping in front of an approaching tank. To advance is to make advancement, particularly when it comes to your understanding of a subject. The state of medical technology has greatly improved. If you advance someone money, you are either lending them the money or paying them earlier than expected. To bring an event, its time, or date forward implies to move it to a later time or date.Diets high in protein may hasten the ageing process.
Learn more about Advance here:
https://brainly.com/question/550004
#SPJ4
A real estate broker refuses to represent a paraplegic buyer, citing the difficulty in locating an appropriate house for her. He could be punished under all of these statutes, except the:
Answers
Answer:
The options are
A. Federal Fair housing Act
B. Fair employment and Housing Act
C. Unruh Civil Right Acts
D. Americans with Disability Act
The answer is D: Americans with Disabilities Act
Explanation:
The real estate broker excuse was a lack of suitable house for the disability and doesn’t involve discrimination of the condition which is why the Americans with Disabilities Act is correct.
The remaining acts which include Federal Fair housing Act,Fair employment and Housing Act, Unruh Civil Right Acts all cater for and cover people living with disabilities.
one of the major considerations in planning where to allow growth is
Answers
One major consideration in planning where to allow growth is the availability of infrastructure and resources to support the development.
When planning for growth, one of the crucial factors to consider is the availability of infrastructure and resources necessary to support the development. This includes assessing the capacity of transportation systems, utilities (such as water, electricity, and sewage), and other essential services required to accommodate increased population and economic activity.
Adequate infrastructure ensures that new developments can function efficiently and sustainably, minimizing congestion, promoting accessibility, and maintaining quality of life. Additionally, considerations may include proximity to existing amenities, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and recreational areas, as well as potential impacts on the environment and natural resources. By taking into account these factors, planners can make informed decisions regarding where growth should be allowed to ensure sustainable and well-supported development.
To know more about availability of infrastructure click here brainly.com/question/869476
#SPJ11
Dr .Henry lee testimony o.j simpson
Answers
Answer:
itz a case...
Explanation:
Renowned forensic scientist Henry Lee said Thursday that the O.J. Simpson double-murder trial in 1995 not only revealed the racial chasm in America but the importance of strictly following established protocols in processing crime scenes.
“There were so many issues with the major crime scene in that case,” said Mr. Lee, who holds a doctorate and who testified for five days as a defense expert for Simpson. “This case set the landmarks for crime scene and laboratory handling of evidence.’
Mr. Lee’s comments came on the first day of the two-day inaugural conference “Pioneers of Forensic Science,” at which he is the first honoree. One of the world’s foremost criminalists, Mr. Lee has been involved in the Laci Peterson, JonBenet Ramsey, Caylee Anthony and Vince Foster cases, among many others.
Mr. Lee, Connecticut’s chief emeritus of scientific services, has served as that state’s commissioner of public safety, forensic science laboratory director and chief criminalist. He is the founder of the University of New Haven’s Henry C. Lee Institute of Forensic Science and is the namesake of its Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences.
He spoke on a panel “People v. O.J. Simpson: An Interdisciplinary Retrospective on the Case that Brought Forensic Science to the World.”
Other panelists included F. Lee Bailey, a member of Simpson’s “Dream Team” of defense attorneys; Dr. Michael Baden, former chief medical examiner for New York City who also was a Simpson defense expert; and Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, Pittsburgh’s renowned forensic pathologist who was an expert commentator on the Simpson case on national television programs. He also is the namesake of Duquesne University’s Cyril H. Wecht Institute of Forensic Science and Law, the conference sponsor. University President Kenneth G. Gormley, who holds law degree, moderated the two-hour panel discussion.
A native of China, Mr. Lee said he had no idea who Mr. Simpson was when he was asked to be an expert for him at trial. He reconstructed the crime scene and examined every piece of evidence collected.
“I knew there was something wrong with the case by the physical evidence. There were lots of problems.”
He discovered that notes taken by Los Angeles Police Department criminalists at the scene were later substituted with other documents. “We found this out because the notes are stapled, but we found extra staple holes,” meaning they had been re-stapled.
Mr. Lee recounted his testimony about a crucial piece of the prosecution’s evidence—a bloodstain found on the walkway outside the Bundy Drive home where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman were killed in June 1994.
DNA tests indicated O.J. Simpson was the likely source of the blood, but Mr. Lee testified he was suspicious because he discovered four small patches of blood on the paper packet wrapped around the Bundy evidence. That would indicate the blood swatches were wet and leaked onto the paper, yet LAPD technicians had testified that they left the swatches to dry overnight.
Asked by defense attorney Barry Scheck to account for the stains, Mr. Lee famously answered, “The only explanation I can give under these circumstances is, something’s wrong.”
As a scientist, Mr. Lee wouldn’t speculate either at the trial or at Thursday’s conference about how that could have occurred, but Mr. Bailey isn’t a scientist, so he wasn’t so circumspect. That evidence and the infamous glove and the bloody sock and anything else indicating Simpson’s guilt was planted, he said.
Why are techniques or rules to interpret the meaning of statutes necessary?
Answers
The techniques or the rules that are used to interpret statutes are very necessary given the fact that they help to justify the decisions that are made by the judges that preside over cases.
What is a statute?The term statute has to do with the enactment that is established by the legislative arm of a nation as a legal document that has to do with the ways that the policies of the nation would have to be carried out as well as the laws and the regulations that are necessary in the area.
The use of statutes is very necessary because it is wha tis used to decide cases by the law courts. The judge would have to base jis decisions based on what the law expects him to do at the moment.
It is necessary to know the statutes so that a person would be able to know the true meaning of the terms that are contained in that statutes.
Read more on government statutes here: https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ1
Role and importance of law in society
Answers
Answer:
Laws provide a framework and rules to help resolve disputes between individuals. Laws create a system where individuals can bring their disputes before an impartial fact-finder, such as a judge or jury.Law can provide justice to the victims and punish those who are responsible for unlawful actions. In courts, a law is used to settle conflicts among the people. The main function of law is to ensure all-round development of people by providing security, peace, and protection.
9. Explain the difference between valid, void, and voidable
contracts.
Answers
A valid contract is legally enforceable, a void contract has no legal effect, and a voidable contract is initially valid but can be voided by one or more parties due to specific circumstances.
Valid Contract:A valid contract is a legally enforceable agreement that meets all the essential elements required for its formation. These elements typically include:
Offer: One party makes a clear and specific proposal to another party.Acceptance: The other party accepts the offer without any conditions or modifications.Void Contract:A void contract, also known as a void ab initio contract, is a contract that is considered null and invalid from the beginning. It lacks legal effect and cannot be enforced by either party. A void contract may arise in situations such as:
Illegal Purpose: The contract's objective is illegal or against public policy from the outset.Lack of Capacity: One or both parties lack legal capacity to enter into the contract, such as minors or mentally incapacitated individuals.Voidable Contract:A voidable contract is a contract that is initially valid and enforceable, but due to certain defects or circumstances, one party has the option to either affirm the contract or void it. Some common situations that may render a contract voidable include:
Misrepresentation: One party provides false information or conceals material facts, inducing the other party to enter into the contract.Duress: One party is coerced or forced into the contract through threats or undue influence.To know more about valid contract
brainly.com/question/6491012
#SPJ11
When you get pulled over and got a warning do they call the primary owner of the vehicle?
Answers
Answer:
No they will not call the primary owner.
Explanation:
That is there responsibility so if they drive in your car and get a warning or ticket it will go to there personal record not yours and they will not call the owner
the u.s. supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. true of false
Answers
It is true to say that the U.S. Supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Supreme Court said on Monday that a choice last term holding that the Constitution requires consistent jury decisions for state criminal preliminaries doesn't matter retroactively.
The decision is a misfortune for Thedrick Edwards and many others in Oregon, Louisiana and Puerto Rico, purviews that permitted non-consistent decisions under the steady gaze of the High Court's choice last year in Ramos v. Louisiana.
The 6-3 greater part choice was written by Equity Brett Kavanaugh, who was joined by the court's other moderate individuals.
In her contradiction, Equity Elena Kagan, joined by the court's other two liberal individuals, composed that last year's choice "accompanies a commitment, or in any event."
"On the off chance that the right to a consistent jury is so key - in the event that a decision delivered by a partitioned jury is 'no decision by any means' - then Thedrick Edwards shouldn't consume his time on earth in the slammer more than two hearers' resistance. I consciously disagree," she composed.
To know more about court,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29786682
#SPJ4
regarding the actions taken by the san diego 10th-grader as described in this chapter's opening scenario, did she break the law? (you may want to look back at chapter 2 regarding the applicable laws.) if, in fact, she did not break any laws, was the purposeful damage to another via malware infection an unethical action? if not, why not?
Answers
No, this type of circumstances can only be minimized.
Why do we refer to breaking the law?
Breaking the law is closely connected to the term "interrupt," which dates back to the 15th century and originally meant "to interfere with a legal right."Is it bad to breach the law morally?
It is now generally accepted that a person might have a moral justification for breaching the law, even if it is a legal law in a democracy with generally just institutions. However, there is far less consensus over the kinds of factors that form sound moral justifications for disobedience.Why breaking the law is not acceptable?
It is never acceptable to break the law by taking something from someone else or by hurting someone else. A person must breach the law because they honestly feel it is unjust, not because it is easy to do so.To know more about law, checkout this link:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
Describe at least 3 powers that are reserved for the National government. Describe at least 3 powers reserved for State governments. Describe at least 3 powers shared between the National and State governments. Who do you think has more power, the national or state governments, and why?
Answers
Answer:
national powers: coining money, making laws, explaining laws
state powers: minimum wage, opening schools, establishing businesses
national probably has more power because they can make and establish laws, plus they are the ones who gave the states the power
Explanation:
an individual sets fire to a house to dispose of physical evidence. this is an example of ______ arson.
Answers
To dispose of tangible evidence, a person sets fire to a house. This is an illustration of criminal arson.
This type of arson is committed with the intent to cause damage or harm, and it is considered a serious crime in most jurisdictions.
In cases of arson for the purpose of disposing of physical evidence, the perpetrator may be attempting to conceal their involvement in another crime, such as murder, theft, or drug trafficking. By destroying the physical evidence, they hope to avoid detection and prosecution.
Criminal arson is a dangerous and destructive act that can result in serious injury or death, as well as extensive property damage. It is important that individuals who are suspected of committing arson are apprehended and brought to justice. Law enforcement officials and fire investigators use a variety of techniques to identify arson suspects, including forensic analysis, witness interviews, and surveillance.
To learn more about jurisdictions
https://brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ4
If you drink socially, what helps insure safe driving ?
Answers
Answer:
A. Drink coffee before driving.
B. Ride home with a friend who has not been drinking.
C. Take a cold shower before driving.
D. Stop drinking one half hour before driving.
Explanation:
One strategy to avoid driving while impaired or intoxicated is to arrange for a ride home with a friend who does not drink. Drinking coffee or taking a cold shower cannot reduce your blood alcohol content or reduce the effects of alcohol. On average, it takes about an hour for the body to eliminate the alcohol from a single drink
Having coffee before you drive, Take a sober friend with you on the ride home, Before driving, take a chilly shower and Give up drinking 30 minutes before you drive helps insure safe driving.
What is the meaning of safe driving?Being a safe driver entails driving attentively, paying attention to the environment on the road at all times, and being prepared to act at any moment.
Caffeine can counteract the depressive effects of alcohol by masking them, making consumers feel more alert than they otherwise would. Because of this, people might consume more alcohol than they realize and become more inebriated, which raises the possibility of alcohol-related problems.
Remember that the first rule is always safety, so buckle up. The second rule is to maintain concentration and keep your eyes on the road. Check your mirrors frequently and avoid distractions like talking on the phone or eating while driving. Last but not least, maintain both hands on the wheel.
Thus, having coffee before you drive.
For more information about meaning of safe driving, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29672447
#SPJ5
If a(n) _____ is set for the defendant, he or she is entitled to stay at his or her home until the trial date.
A. Defense
B. Hearing
C. Bail
D. Arrest
C is the correct answer.
Answers
Why are laws important in our society? Explain.
Answers
Answer:The law is important as it serves as a guide about what is agreed in society. Without it, there will be tension between social classes and cultures. We must pursue them. The legislation makes it possible to accept improvements that exist in society.
The movie FINDING NEMO would fall under which intellectual property category? *
Answers
Answer: Copyright
Explanation:
Copyright category of IP Law that protects original works of authorship
- this extends to anything authored including literature, dramas, musicals, paintings, novels, songs, software, architecture, and movies!
hope this helps!
n the featured case Sorrell v. IMS Health, a challenged Vermont law restricted the use of information on doctors. The legal challenge centered on _____________. The Supreme Court _____________ the Vermont law.
Answers
In the featured case Sorrell v. IMS Health, a challenged Vermont law restricted the use of information on doctors. The legal challenge centered on First Amendment rights. The Supreme Court struck down the Vermont law.
Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc. is a landmark Supreme Court case that involved a Vermont state law that limited the sale, exchange, and use of prescriber data for marketing purposes by pharmaceutical manufacturers and data mining companies. Pharmaceutical manufacturers argued that the Vermont law violated their First Amendment rights to commercial free speech and privacy rights, while Vermont officials argued that the law was meant to reduce healthcare costs and protect privacy rights of the medical professionals.
The legal challenge centered on First Amendment rights. In the Sorrell v. IMS Health case, the Supreme Court held that Vermont's prescription confidentiality law violated the First Amendment. Therefore, the law was struck down as unconstitutional as it violated the First Amendment rights of pharmaceutical companies to provide information to doctors and their patients.
Learn more about First Amendment rights https://brainly.com/question/26448398
#SPJ11
A FELONY crime is generally considered to be: A. A Misdemeanor.B. A Major Crime.C. An InfractionD. A Mistake.
Answers
Answer:
B - Major Crime
Explanation:
Misdemeanors are minor crimes. For example, a misdemeanor is stealing something with a value of less than 1000$. An infraction is a general breaking of rules or laws. A mistake is defined as an action or judgment that is wrong.
You did not obtain a license for your bicycle. The city ordinance requiring bike licenses carries a $50 fine for the failure to obtain a license. Which of the following is true? A. This is an example of a criminal law. B. This is an example of a private law. C. This is an example of a state regulation. D. This is an example of tort law.
Answers
The city ordinance requiring bike licenses carries a $50 fine for the failure to obtain a license. Option C. This is an example of a state regulation.
The situation described, where failing to obtain a license for a bicycle results in a $50 fine under a city ordinance, falls under the category of a state regulation. State regulations refer to laws or rules enacted by a government entity, in this case, the city, to govern certain activities or behaviors within its jurisdiction.
These regulations aim to maintain order, safety, or other desired objectives in the community. In this scenario, the city has implemented a regulation requiring bicycle licenses, and the failure to comply with this requirement incurs a specified penalty.
Bike licenses are legal permits required by some jurisdictions for bicycles. They serve as a form of identification and can be subject to regulations, fees, and penalties for non-compliance.
To learn more about bike licenses refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/121230#
#SPJ11