What is the value of -(9)?

The total cost of rents is $180.

In the given table,

The cost of skis per day  = $48

The cost of pole per day = $12

Now since given that,

Alveres rents for 3 days

Therefore,

The cost of skis for 3 days  = $48 x 3

                                             =  $144

The cost of pole for 3 days = $12 x 3

                                             = $36

To find the total cost of rental,

Adding the cost of 3 days of skis and cost of 3 days of poles,

Hence,

Total cost of rents = $144 + $36

                               = $180

Learn more about the addition visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25421984

#SPJ1

The function representing the number of bacteria after t hours is N(t) = 5300 * (1 + 0.0592)^t, and the growth rate per hour is approximately 5.92%.

To represent the number of bacteria after t hours, we can use the exponential growth formula:

N(t) = N₀ * (1 + r)^t,

where N(t) is the number of bacteria after t hours, N₀ is the initial number of bacteria, r is the hourly growth rate, and t is the time in hours.

In this case, the initial number of bacteria is 5300, and the hourly growth rate can be determined from the doubling time of 12 hours. The growth rate can be calculated using the formula:

r = 2^(1/t_double) - 1,

where t_double is the doubling time in hours.

Substituting the given values, we have:

r = 2^(1/12) - 1 ≈ 0.0592.

Now we can write the function for the number of bacteria after t hours:

N(t) = 5300 * (1 + 0.0592)^t.

To determine the percentage of growth per hour, we can calculate the relative growth rate as a percentage:

percentage_growth = r * 100 ≈ 5.92%.

For more such questions on growth rate

https://brainly.com/question/29334875

#SPJ8

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  8 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

It is convenient to write the proportion with the unknown (width) on top:

  width/length = 4/9 = w/(18 cm)

Multiplying by 18 cm gives ...

  w = (18 cm)(4/9) = 8 cm

The width of the rectangle is 8 cm.

Answer:

The answer is 8.

Step-by-step explanation:

I did a test with this question on it.

This was the correct answer.

YOUR WELCOME!!! HOPE IT WAS HELPFUL :)

Answer:

D;the last answer

Step-by-step explanation:

The more negative a fraction or decimal, the lower that actual value.

Therefore since -1 1/5 is the lowest it should go first, and D is the only answer like this! Hope this helps ^^

Answer: -1 \(\frac{1}{5}\), -1, 0.25, \(\frac{1}{2}\) , 0.75

Step-by-step explanation:

    I will turn all of these numbers into numbers that are not fractions since most of the numbers are already this way.

0.75 -> 0.75

-1 -> -1

\(\frac{1}{2}\) -> 0.5

-1 \(\frac{1}{5}\) -> -1.2

0.25 -> 0.25

    First of all, the negative numbers are smaller than the positive numbers. Then, we can order them least to greatest by number.

-1.2, -1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75

   Putting the numbers into what they were originally given as gives us this:

-1 \(\frac{1}{5}\), -1, 0.25, \(\frac{1}{2}\) , 0.75

    The answer is the last option, -1 \(\frac{1}{5}\), -1, 0.25, \(\frac{1}{2}\) , 0.75.

1.1. Accumulated depreciation:

The accumulated depreciation for the machine bought on 1 July 2013 would be R150,000 as of 31 March 2016.

1.2. Machine realization:

The machine bought in 2013 was sold for R120,000 on 30 June 2015, resulting in a profit/loss on the sale of R10,000.

1.1. Accumulated Depreciation:

To calculate the accumulated depreciation, we need to determine the annual depreciation expense for each machine and then accumulate it over the years.

Machine bought on 1 July 2013:

Cost: R250,000

Depreciation rate: 20% per annum on cost

Depreciation expense for the year ended 31 March 2014: 20% of R250,000 = R50,000

Depreciation expense for the year ended 31 March 2015: 20% of R250,000 = R50,000

Depreciation expense for the year ended 31 March 2016: 20% of R250,000 = R50,000

Accumulated depreciation for the machine bought on 1 July 2013:

As of 31 March 2014: R50,000

As of 31 March 2015: R100,000

As of 31 March 2016: R150,000

1.2. Machine Realisation:

To record the sale of the machine bought in 2013, we need to adjust the machine's value and the accumulated depreciation.

Machine's original cost: R250,000

Accumulated depreciation as of 30 June 2015: R100,000

Net book value as of 30 June 2015:  

R250,000 - R100,000 = R150,000.

On 30 June 2015, the machine was sold for R120,000.

Realisation amount: R120,000

To record the sale:

Debit Cash: R120,000

Debit Accumulated Depreciation: R100,000

Credit Machine: R250,000

Credit Machine Realisation: R120,000

Credit Profit/Loss on Sale of Machine: R10,000 (difference between net book value and realisation amount).

These entries will reflect the appropriate balances in the ledger accounts and properly close off the accounts for the years ended 31 March 2016.

For similar question on depreciation.

https://brainly.com/question/15998639  

#SPJ8

The side length of the cube is 5.6 feet (rounded to the nearest tenth).

We can calculate the side length of a cube with a volume of 141 cubic feet using the formula for cube volume , which is \(V = s^3\), where V is the volume and s is the side length.

We can calculate s by taking the cube root of both sides of the equation:

\(s = (V)^{(1/3)\)

Substituting V = 141, we get:

\(s = (141)^{(1/3)\)

By using a calculator to evaluate this expression, we may determine:

s ≈ 5.6

As a result, the cube's side length is roughly 5.6 feet (rounded to the closest tenth). This indicates that if we increase the side length by three, it will become longer. (\(s^3\)), we will get the volume of the cube, which is 141 cubic feet.

for such more question on length

https://brainly.com/question/20339811

#SPJ11

Therefore, the package with 40 hooks is the better buy in terms of cost efficiency.

To determine which package is the better buy, we need to compare the cost per hook for each package.

For the package of 25 hooks costing $9.95, we divide the total cost by the number of hooks:

Cost per hook = $9.95 / 25 = $0.398

Rounding to the nearest cent, the cost per hook is $0.40.

For the package of 40 hooks costing $13.99, we divide the total cost by the number of hooks:

Cost per hook = $13.99 / 40 = $0.3498

Rounding to the nearest cent, the cost per hook is $0.35.

Comparing the two costs per hook, we can see that the package with 40 hooks for $13.99 offers a better deal, as the cost per hook is lower at $0.35.

For such more question on package

https://brainly.com/question/12251427

#SPJ8

Answer:

can you round it up? what is the question and what are we solving for?

The domain and the range of the function are

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The graph

The graph is a piecewise function

When combined gives an absolute function

The rule of a function is that

The domain is the set of all real numbers

This means that the input value can take all real values

However, the range is greater than the constant term

In this case, it is 0

So, the range is y > 0

Read more about domain and range at

brainly.com/question/27910766

#SPJ1

Question

The graph represents the piecewise function:

f(x) =

What is the domain and range of the function

Answer:

Since f(-1) = 0 and f(-2) = 0, we can set up two equations:

(-1)³ + p(-1)² - q(-1) - 4 = 0

(-2)³ + p(-2)² - q(-2) - 4 = 0

Simplifying each equation, we get:

-1 + p - q - 4 = 0

-8 + 4p - 2q - 4 = 0

Simplifying further, we get:

p - q = 5

2p - q = 6

Solving for p and q, we can add the two equations together to eliminate q:

p - q + 2p - q = 5 + 6

3p - 2q = 11

Then, we can substitute the value of q from the first equation into this equation to solve for p:

3p - 2(q + 5) = 11

3p - 2q - 10 = 11

3p - 2q = 21

3p - 2(5 + p) = 21

p - 10 = 7

p = 17

Substituting this value of p into either equation for q, we get:

q = p - 5 = 12

Therefore, the coefficients are p = 17 and q = 12. To factor the expression, we can use synthetic division or long division. Using synthetic division, we get:

-1 | 1 17 -12 -4

|__ -1 -16 28

1 1 12

This gives us the factorization:

f(x) = (x + 1)(x² + x + 12)

To find the solutions, we can use the quadratic formula on the quadratic factor:

x = (-1 ± sqrt(1 - 4(1)(12))) / 2(1)

x = (-1 ± sqrt(1 - 48)) / 2

x = (-1 ± sqrt(-47)) / 2

x1 = (-1 + i(sqrt(47))) / 2

x2 = (-1 - i(sqrt(47))) / 2

Therefore, the solutions are x1 = (-1 + i(sqrt(47))) / 2, x2 = (-1 - i(sqrt(47))) / 2, and x3 = -1.

Step-by-step explanation:

give me thanks for more! your welcome bud!

Answer:

Take the picture you uploaded.

Click the rotate 'button' once.

Change the x to y and y to x on the graph. (axis labels)

Done

J (0, -1)

K(-4,-3)

I ( -4,-1)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Maureen's pension would be $50,035.20.

What is Percentage?

To compute a percentage, divide the value by the entire amount and multiply the result by 100. A percentage is a quantity or ratio that is stated as a fraction of one hundred. The percent sign, "%," is frequently used to represent it.

First, we need to calculate the average of Maureen's three highest salaries:

Average = (107,000 + 107,800 + 108,198) / 3

Average = 322,998 / 3

Average = 107,666

Next, we need to calculate 1.56% of this average:

Percentage = 1.56% * 107,666

Percentage = 1,667.84

Finally, we multiply this percentage by the number of years worked to find the pension:

Pension = 30 * 1,667.84

Pension = 50,035.20

So, Maureen's pension would be $50,035.20.

To know more about Percentage visit,

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ1

The approximate height of the tree is given as follows:

45.6 ft.

The geometric mean theorem states that the length of the altitude drawn from the right angle of a triangle to its hypotenuse is equal to the geometric mean of the lengths of the segments formed on the hypotenuse.

The altitude segment for this problem is given as follows:

14.5 ft.

The bases are given as follows:

5.2 ft and x ft.

Hence the value of x is given as follows:

5.2x = 14.5²

x = 14.5²/5.2

x = 40.4 ft.

Hence the height of the three is given as follows:

5.2 + 40.4 = 45.6 ft.

More can be learned about the geometric mean theorem at brainly.com/question/10216660

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

a) ΔABC ≅ ΔEFD by the AAS (Angle-angle-side) theorem

b) Not necessarily congruent

c) ΔGHI ≅ KLJ by the SSS (side-side-side) theorem

a) ∠B = ∠F

∠A = ∠E

∠C = ∠D

Hence, triangle ABC is congruent to triangle EFD

ΔABC ≅ ΔEFD by the AAS (Angle-angle-side) theorem

b) ∠W = ∠X

∠U = ∠Z

∠V = ∠Y

But UW is not equal to XZ, UW is XZ.

Not necessarily congruent

c) GH ≅ KL

GI ≅ JK

HI ≅ JL

Hence, triangle GHI is congruent to triangle KLJ

ΔGHI ≅ KLJ by the SSS (side-side-side) theorem

Given the equation of the parabola:

Find the vertex form of the parabola.

Given a vertical parabola with the vertex located at (h,k) and leading coefficient of a, the vertex form of the parabola is:

To find the vertex form of the parabola, we must complete squares of the given equation.

Add and subtract 9 to the equation:

The correct options are -

When something is bought on credit, an initial payment is made in the form of a down payment.

Given is that Renata is purchasing a condominium for $125,000. She wants to put down a down payment of 20%.

We can calculate the amount she is putting in down payment as -

{x} = 20% of 125000

{x} = 20/100 x 125000

{x} = 20 x 1250

{x} = 25000

Therefore, the correct options are -

To solve more questions on functions & equations, visit the link-

https://brainly.com/question/29014197

#SPJ9

The probability of drawing a king from a standard deck of 52 cards is 1/13.

In a standard deck of 52 playing cards, there are four kings: the king of hearts, the king of diamonds, the king of clubs, and the king of spades.

To find the probability of drawing a king, we need to determine the ratio of favorable outcomes (drawing a king) to the total number of possible outcomes (drawing any card from the deck).

The total number of possible outcomes is 52 because there are 52 cards in the deck.

The favorable outcomes, in this case, are the four kings.

Therefore, the probability of drawing a king is given by:

Probability = (Number of favorable outcomes) / (Number of possible outcomes)

= 4 / 52

= 1 / 13

Thus, the probability of drawing a king from a standard deck of 52 cards is 1/13.

This means that out of every 13 cards drawn, on average, one of them will be a king.

It is important to note that the probability of drawing a king remains the same regardless of any previous cards that have been drawn or any other factors.

Each draw is independent, and the probability of drawing a king is constant.

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/7965468  

#SPJ8

Answer:

\(y = -\frac{1}{3}x + 4\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Required

Equation of line

passes through \((6,2)\)

In an equation of the form \(y =mx + b\); the slope is \(m\)

So, by comparison;

The slope of \(y = 3x + 1\) is: \(m =3\)

From the question, we understand that the required equation is perpendicular to \(y = 3x + 1\)

This means that its slope is:

\(m_2 =-\frac{1}{m}\)

So, we have:

\(m_2 =-\frac{1}{3}\)

The line equation is:

\(y = m_2(x - x_1) + y_1\)

Where:

\((x_1,y_1) = (6,2)\)

So, we have:

\(y = -\frac{1}{3}(x - 6) + 2\)

\(y = -\frac{1}{3}x + 2 + 2\)

\(y = -\frac{1}{3}x + 4\)

Answer:

1)5:9 ,5 of 9 5/9 2) 36x5 3) 95x5

The expressions are simplified to;

1. 72n² + 63n

2. 18t - 18t²

3. -18b² - 18b

4. -56r - 21r²

5. -6m + 9m²

Algebraic expressions are simply described as expressions that are known to consist of coefficients of variables, variables, constants, terms, and factors.

These algebraic expressions are also made up of mathematical or arithmetic operations.

These operations are;

From the information given, we have;

1. -9n (-8n -7)

expand the bracket

72n² + 63n

2. -2t(-9 + 9t)

expand the bracket

18t - 18t²

3. -3b(6b + 6)

expand the bracket

-18b² - 18b

4. -7r(8 + 3r)

expand the bracket

-56r - 21r²

5. 3m(-2 + 3m)

expand the bracket

-6m + 9m²

Learn more about algebraic expressions at: https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ1

The quotient of z₁ by z₂ in trigonometric form is:

7/21 * (cos(584°) + i sin(584°))

To find the quotient of z₁ by z₂ in trigonometric form, we'll express both complex numbers in trigonometric form and then divide them.

Let's represent z₁ in trigonometric form as z₁ = r₁(cosθ₁ + isinθ₁), where r₁ is the magnitude of z₁ and θ₁ is the argument of z₁.

We have:

z₁ = 7(cos(577°) + i sin(577°))

Now, let's represent z₂ in trigonometric form as z₂ = r₂(cosθ₂ + isinθ₂), where r₂ is the magnitude of z₂ and θ₂ is the argument of z₂.

From the given information, we have:

z₂ = 21(cos(-7°) + i sin(-77°))

To find the quotient, we divide z₁ by z₂:

z₁ / z₂ = (r₁/r₂) * [cos(θ₁ - θ₂) + i sin(θ₁ - θ₂)]

Substituting the given values, we have:

z₁ / z₂ = (7/21) * [cos(577° - (-7°)) + i sin(577° - (-7°))]

= (7/21) * [cos(584°) + i sin(584°)]

The quotient of z₁ by z₂ in trigonometric form is:

7/21 * (cos(584°) + i sin(584°))

Option C, 21(cos(-7°) + i sin(-77°)), is not the correct answer as it does not represent the quotient of z₁ by z₂.

For more questions on trigonometric form

https://brainly.com/question/31744474

#SPJ8

Answer:

4624 hope this helps

\( \sqrt{2 ^{2} } \times \sqrt{17} \)

4. Simplify the radical expression and get

\(2 \sqrt{17} \)

Answer:

B. Since Ax-b is consistent, its solution set is obtained by translating the solution set of Ax=0. So the solution set of Ax = b is a single vector if and only if the solution set of Ax= 0 is a single vector, and that happens if and only if Ax 0 has only the trivial solution.

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer to the question is answer B. and here is the explanation below

let us imagine that the equation ax = b has a solution

now our goal will be to show that the solution of ax =b when ax = 0 has only trivial solution.

ax = 0 is homogenous

if this equation was consistent for b, we define

ax = b to be a set of vector that has the form

w = m + gh(h is a subscript)

gh is a solution of ax = 0

from what we have above, ax=b is in the form ofw= m+gh

with

m = solution of ax=b

gh = soulution of ax=0

ax = 0 has only trivial solution

gh = 0

with gh = 0

ax=b is w=m

so ax = b is unique.

Answer:

18x + 16

Step-by-step explanation:

(Not simplest form) 9x + 9x + 8 + 8

To get simplest form, just add the terms and integers together, which in this case would give you 18x + 16.

Answer:

30x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

30x

Step-by-step explanation:

a negative multiplied by a negative is positive.

-5x x -6 =30x

Hope I helped!

Answer: 18 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

the perimeter of a rectangle = 2 equal sides + 2 different equal sides

27cm + 27cm = 54cm

90cm - 54cm = 36cm

36cm/2 = 18 cm

27+27+18+18= 90

Answer:

The wood was cut approximately 8679 years ago.

Step-by-step explanation:

At first we assume that examination occured in 2020. The decay of radioactive isotopes are represented by the following ordinary differential equation:

\(\frac{dm}{dt} = -\frac{m}{\tau}\) (Eq. 1)

Where:

\(\frac{dm}{dt}\) - First derivative of mass in time, measured in miligrams per year.

\(\tau\) - Time constant, measured in years.

\(m\) - Mass of the radioactive isotope, measured in miligrams.

Now we obtain the solution of this differential equation:

\(\int {\frac{dm}{m} } = -\frac{1}{\tau}\int dt\)

\(\ln m = -\frac{1}{\tau} + C\)

\(m(t) = m_{o}\cdot e^{-\frac{t}{\tau} }\) (Eq. 2)

Where:

\(m_{o}\) - Initial mass of isotope, measured in miligrams.

\(t\) - Time, measured in years.

And time is cleared within the equation:

\(t = -\tau \cdot \ln \left[\frac{m(t)}{m_{o}} \right]\)

Then, time constant can be found as a function of half-life:

\(\tau = \frac{t_{1/2}}{\ln 2}\) (Eq. 3)

If we know that \(t_{1/2} = 5730\,yr\) and \(\frac{m(t)}{m_{o}} = 0.35\), then:

\(\tau = \frac{5730\,yr}{\ln 2}\)

\(\tau \approx 8266.643\,yr\)

\(t = -(8266.643\,yr)\cdot \ln 0.35\)

\(t \approx 8678.505\,yr\)

The wood was cut approximately 8679 years ago.

Answer: search

Step-by-step explanation: look up the question on your browser and the answer will pop up