What is the simplified slope intercept form

The ratio of boy to girl who play kickball at race is 6 to 2. There are 18 girl on the team. the number of boys who play kickball at race is 12 boys.

The ratio of boy to girl who play kickball at race is 6 to 2

6 boys: 2 girls

Multiply the number of girls by the ratio:

18 girls x (6 boys / 2 girls) = 18 x 3 = 54

Subtract the number of girls from the total to get the number of boys:

54 - 18 = 36

Therefore, there are 12 boys who play kickball at race.

Learn more about ratio here

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ4

Answer:

(a) What percentage of women would not be able to use the original ejection seats designed for men?

To answer this question, we need to find the percentage of women whose weight is outside the range of 140 lb to 201 lb, which is the weight range for which the original ejection seats were designed. We can do this by standardizing the weight distribution of women using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where z is the standard score, x is the weight of a woman, μ is the mean weight of women, and σ is the standard deviation of the weight of women.

Substituting the given values, we get:

z = (140 - 162) / 46 = -0.478

z = (201 - 162) / 46 = 0.848

Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we can find that the percentage of women whose weight is below 140 lb (corresponding to a z-score of -0.478) is 31.45%. Similarly, the percentage of women whose weight is above 201 lb (corresponding to a z-score of 0.848) is 19.34%. Therefore, the percentage of women who would not be able to use the original ejection seats designed for men is:

31.45% + 19.34% = 50.79%

(b) What weight range would accommodate 99.7% of the female pilots?

To find the weight range that would accommodate 99.7% of the female pilots, we need to find the z-scores that correspond to the 0.15% and 99.85% percentiles of the standard normal distribution. Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we can find that these z-scores are approximately -2.97 and 2.97, respectively.

Substituting these z-scores into the standardization formula, we get:

-2.97 = (x - 162) / 46

x = 63.88 lb

and

2.97 = (x - 162) / 46

x = 260.12 lb

Therefore, the weight range that would accommodate 99.7% of the female pilots is approximately 63.88 lb to 260.12 lb.

(c) What percentage of women would need ejection seats redesigned for them?

To find the percentage of women who would need ejection seats redesigned for them, we need to find the percentage of women whose weight is outside the weight range that would accommodate 99.7% of the female pilots. Using the values from part (b), we can see that the weight range that would accommodate 99.7% of the female pilots is approximately 63.88 lb to 260.12 lb. Therefore, the percentage of women who would need ejection seats redesigned for them is:

100% - 99.7% = 0.3%

Jennifer has 48 nickels, which means she has 144 quarters.

Let's call the number of nickels Jennifer has "n".

Since Jennifer has three more dimes than nickels, she has n + 3 dimes.

And since she has three times as many quarters as nickels, she has 3n quarters.

We can start by figuring out the total value of the nickels and dimes in terms of cents:

n * 5 cents + (n + 3) * 10 cents = 750 cents

Expanding the right side of the equation and solving for n:

5n + 10n + 30 cents = 750 cents

15n + 30 cents = 750 cents

15n = 720 cents

n = 48

So Jennifer has 48 nickels, which means she has 3 * 48 = 144 quarters.

You can learn more about finding missing quantity at

https://brainly.com/question/29417721

#SPJ4

Answer:

Without specific information about the distribution of grades or the number of students, we cannot calculate the probability.

The probability that a randomly selected student earned a B- or better on the quizzes is approximately 15.87%, assuming a normal distribution of grades with a mean of 75 and a standard deviation of 5.

We first need to understand the distribution of grades in the class. We assume that the grades are normally distributed, with a mean of μ and a standard deviation of σ. This means that the majority of the grades will be clustered around the mean, with fewer students getting grades farther from the mean.
To find the probability that a randomly selected student earned a B- or better on the quizzes, we need to determine the z-score associated with that grade. A z-score measures the distance between a raw score and the mean, in terms of standard deviations. It tells us how unusual or typical a score is within the distribution.
To calculate the z-score, we use the formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
Where x is the grade we're interested in, μ is the mean of the distribution, and σ is the standard deviation.
Assuming that a B- is equivalent to a numerical grade of 80, and that the mean quiz grade is 75 with a standard deviation of 5, we can calculate the z-score for a B- as follows:
z = (80 - 75) / 5 = 1
Now that we know the z-score associated with a B-, we can look up the probability of getting a score that high or higher in a normal distribution table or use a calculator. For example, using a table, we can find that the probability of getting a z-score of 1 or greater is about 0.1587. This means that approximately 15.87% of students in the class earned a B- or better on the quizzes.
In conclusion, the probability that a randomly selected student earned a B- or better on the quizzes is approximately 15.87%, assuming a normal distribution of grades with a mean of 75 and a standard deviation of 5.

for more questions on probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

The expressions are simplified to give;

7. 4n³(3n² + 4)

8. -3x(3x² - 4)

9. 5(k² - 8k + 2)

10. -10(6 + 6n² + 5n³)

11. 3(6n³ - 4n - 7)

12. 9(7n³ + 9n + 2)

Algebraic expressions are defined as mathematical expressions that are composed of variables, coefficients, terms, factors and constants.

These algebraic expressions are also made up of arithmetic operations, such as;

To factorize the expressions, we have;

12n⁵ + 16n³

Find the common term

4n³(3n² + 4)

-9x³ - 12x

find the common term

-3x(3x² - 4)

5k² - 40k + 10

find the common terms

5(k² - 8k + 2)

-60 + 60n² + 50n³

find the common term

-10(6 + 6n² + 5n³)

18n³ -12n - 21

find the common term

3(6n³ - 4n - 7)

63n³ + 81n + 18

Find the common term

9(7n³ + 9n + 2)

Learn about algebraic expressions at: https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ1

By solving a system of equations and a quadratic equation, we will see that x = 2.

We know that x and y are positive integers, that x < y and:

x*y = 56

We also know that "seven times the reciprocal of the smaller integer plus 14 times the reciprocal of the larger integer equals 4"

Then we can write the equation:

7*(1/x) + 14*(1/y) = 4

So we have a system of equations:

x*y = 56

7*(1/x) + 14*(1/y) = 4

We can rewrite the first equation to get:

x = 56/y

And the second equation as:

14/y = 4 - 7/x

Then the system becomes:

56/y = x

14/y = (4 - 7/x)

Taking the quotient between these, we can remove the variable y:

(56/y)/(14/y) = x/(4 - 7/x)

56/14 = x/(4 - 7/x)

4*(4 - 7/x) = x

4*(4x - 7)/x = x

4*(4x - 7) = x^2

So now we have a quadratic equation:

x^2 - 16x + 28 = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we will get:

\(x = \frac{16 \pm \sqrt{(-16)^2 -4*1*28} }{2*1} \\\\x = \frac{16 \pm 12 }{2}\)

So the solutions are:

x = (16 - 12)/2 = 2

x = (16 + 12)/2 = 14

But notice that if x = 14, then:

14 = 56/y

y = 56/14

y = 4

And y is larger than x, then x = 14 can be discarded.

The solution is x = 2.

Learn more about quadratic equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

\(\sqrt{3} - \frac{2}{\sqrt{3} } = \frac{3}{\sqrt{3} } - \frac{2}{\sqrt{3} } = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3} } = \frac{\sqrt{3} }{3}\)

ok done. thank to me :>

Answer:

-3y -15

Step-by-step explanation:

2y - 5(y-3) = 2y -5y - 15

                = -3y -15

Your welcome, and feel free to comment if you need have any questions!

The simplified value of the expression, 2y−5(y−3) using the Distributive property is 15- 3y.

Given Expression:

2y−5(y−3)

Using Distributive property

\({\text} a *(b+c) = (a *b) + (a*c)\)

So, applying the Distributive property in the expression  5(y - 3) gives

5(y - 3) = 5y - 15

Substituting the value 5y - 15 in 2y−5(y−3) as

2y−5(y−3) = 2y - (5y-15)

                 = 2y - 5y + 15

Now, operating the simplified value is

2y−5(y−3) = 15 - 3y

Thus, the simplified expression is -3y + 15.

Learn more about Expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/34132400

#SPJ6

Answer:

(0,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

(2,5) to (0,8)

(2-2,5+3) --> (0,8)

The equation that relates M to R is M = 13 - R

From the question, we have the following parameters:

The total number of new magazines is the sum of the number of magazines read and the number of magazines left

This is represented as

Total number of new magazines = Number of magazines read + Number of magazines left

Substitute the known values in the above equation

13 = R +M

Make M the subject

M = 13 - R

Hence, the equation is M = 13 - R

See attachment for the graph

Read more about linear equations at

https://brainly.com/question/13738662

#SPJ1

Answer:

hope this helps :)

Step-by-step explanation:

The expected winnings on a $5 bet are -0.1157 dollars. This means that on average, you will lose about 11.57 cents for each $5 bet you make.

Therefore, the game is not a good bet, as you are expected to lose money in the long run.

What is the probability distribution?

A probability distribution is a mathematical function that describes the probability of different possible values of a variable.

The probability of winning on a $5 bet on a specific number in chuck-a-luck is determined by the number of ways that the number can appear on the three dice and the total number of possible outcomes.

If the number appears on exactly one die, there are 3 ways that this can happen out of a total of 6^3 = 216 possible outcomes, giving a probability of 3/216 or 1/72.

If the number appears on exactly two dice, there are 3 ways to choose the two dice on which it appears, and 3 ways to choose the third die, giving a total of 33 = 9 ways out of 216 possible outcomes, giving a probability of 9/216 or 1/24.

If the number appears on all three dice, there is only 1 way this can happen out of 216 possible outcomes, giving a probability of 1/216.

If it appears on none of the dice, there are (543) ways this can happen, giving a probability of (54*3)/216 = 20/216.

We can use this information to construct the probability distribution for chuck-a-luck:

x P(x)

-5 (losing the bet) 20/216

5 (winning the bet for one appearance) 1/72

10 (winning the bet for two appearances) 1/24

15 (winning the bet for three appearances) 1/216

To find the expected winnings on a $5 bet, we can multiply the value of each outcome by its corresponding probability, and sum the results:

E(X) = (-5)(20/216) + (5)(1/72) + (10)(1/24) + (15)(1/216)

E(X) = -5/43.2 + 5/72 + 5/12 + 15/216

E(X) = -0.1157

Hence, the expected winnings on a $5 bet are -0.1157 dollars. This means that on average, you will lose about 11.57 cents for each $5 bet you make.

Therefore, the game is not a good bet, as you are expected to lose money in the long run.

To learn more about the probability distribution visit,

https://brainly.com/question/28021875

#SPJ4

The graph of the function y = \(x^3\) - \(6x^2\) is concave downward for the values of x where the second derivative is negative.

In this case, the second derivative of the function is y'' = 6 - 12x. The function is concave downward when 6 - 12x < 0, which simplifies to x > 1/2.

To determine the concavity of the graph of y =\(x^3\)- \(6x^2\), we need to analyze the second derivative y''. Taking the derivative of the function y = \(x^3\) - \(6x^2\) twice, we obtain y'' = 6 - 12x.

For the function to be concave downward, the second derivative y'' must be negative. So we set 6 - 12x < 0 and solve for x. Simplifying the inequality, we find that x > 1/2.

Therefore, the graph of y = \(x^3\) - \(6x^2\) is concave downward for all values of x greater than 1/2.

Learn more about derivative here:

https://brainly.com/question/29144258

#SPJ11

rate of change:

\(\sf \bold{\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1} }\)

coordinates taken: (0, 0), (2, 1)

\(\rightarrow \dfrac{1-0}{2-0}\)

\(\rightarrow \dfrac{1}{2}\)

Take 2 points

\(\\ \rm\rightarrowtail m=\dfrac{1+1}{2+2}\)

\(\\ \rm\rightarrowtail m=\dfrac{2}{4}\)

\(\\ \rm\rightarrowtail m=\dfrac{1}{2}\)

"Id r24, r26." The explanation for this is that the id instruction is used for indirect addressing, meaning it accesses the value stored at the memory address specified by the register. In this case, r24 is the destination register and r26 is the source register that contains the memory address.

the proper assembly line instruction to increment the pointer X by 1 is "inc X." This instruction increments the value stored in register X by 1. The other options either decrement X or use a different addressing mode that may not work for incrementing a pointer.

the id instruction is used for indirect addressing and "Id r24, r26" is the proper use in this scenario. "Inc X" is the proper instruction to increment the pointer X by 1.

To know more about mode visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/28566521

#SPJ11

For the notation of average the expression {{1, 1, 0} [0, 1] 0} is evaluates to  0.3889 approximately.

To evaluate the expression {{1, 1, 0} [0, 1] 0}, we need to follow the notation,

[a, b] denotes the average of a and b.

{a, b, c} denotes the average of a, b, and c.

Let's break down the expression step by step

[0, 1]

= (0 + 1) / 2

= 1/2

= 0.5

Now we have {{1, 1, 0} 0.5 0}. We can evaluate the inner expression first.

{1, 1, 0}

= (1 + 1 + 0) / 3

= 2/3

≈ 0.6667

Now we have {0.6667 0.5 0}. We can apply the same notation to find the average,

{0.6667, 0.5, 0}

= (0.6667 + 0.5 + 0) / 3

= 1.1667 / 3

≈ 0.3889

Therefore, the expression {{1, 1, 0} [0, 1] 0} for the notation of average evaluates to approximately 0.3889.

learn more about average here

brainly.com/question/27974139

#SPJ4

Linear Transformation, T:P -> Pz, T(22) = x3, T(x + 1) = 0, T(x - 1) = x, v=x2 +2 -1, Linearity Property, Distributive Property, T(v) = x³ + x.

Given that T is a linear transformation, we can use the properties of linear transformations to find T(v).

Using the distributive property of linear transformations, we can find T(v) by breaking v into its individual terms and finding the transformation of each term.

So, v = x² + 2 - 1 = x² + 1

T(v) = T(x² + 1)

Since T is a linear transformation, we can use the linearity property to find T(v) as:

T(v) = T(x²) + T(1)

Now, we have to find T(x²) and T(1).

T(x²) = T(x) * T(x) = T(x + 1) + T(x - 1) = 0 + x = x

And T(1) = T(1 * x°) = 1 * T(x°) = 1 * T(22) = 1 * x³ = x³

So,

T(v) = T(x²) + T(1) = x + x³ = x³ + x

Hence, T(v) = x³ + x.

To learn more about the distributive property, visit:

brainly.com/question/5637942

#SPJ4

\(5 + n = 12 \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \)

The function f(x) = rx mapping S2 to S2(r) is one-to-one, onto, but not an isometry if r ≠ 1.

To prove that the function f: S2 → S2(r) defined by f(x) = rx is one-to-one, onto, and not an isometry if r ≠ 1, we'll consider the following:

1. One-to-one: For f to be one-to-one, for every distinct pair of points x, y ∈ S2, we must have f(x) ≠ f(y). Suppose x ≠ y, then rx ≠ ry since r > 0. This shows that f is one-to-one.

2. Onto: To show that f is onto, we must show that for every point y ∈ S2(r), there exists a point x ∈ S2 such that f(x) = y. For y ∈ S2(r), we can find x = (1/r)y, which satisfies |x| = 1, so x ∈ S2. Then f(x) = r(1/r)y = y, proving that f is onto.

3. Not an isometry if r ≠ 1: An isometry is a function that preserves distances between points. If f were an isometry, we'd have |f(x) - f(y)| = |x - y| for all x, y ∈ S2. Consider x, y ∈ S2 with |x - y| = d. Then, |f(x) - f(y)| = |rx - ry| = r|x - y| = rd. If r ≠ 1, rd ≠ d, so f does not preserve distances, and therefore f is not an isometry.

Learn more about one-to-one at https://brainly.com/question/28911089

#SPJ11

If he got -4 = 4, the equation has no solution, due that the two numbers are not equal, so they're not an equation

Answer:

x=3.75

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the surface of "C" would be a triangle if sliced vertically

Step-by-step explanation:

If  vertical slice through a three-dimensional solid produces a two-dimensional shape is triangular prism, option C is correct.

a three dimensional shape can be defined as a solid figure or an object or shape that has three dimensions—length, width, and height.

If a vertical slice through a three-dimensional solid produces a two-dimensional shape which is a triangle, it means that the solid has a triangular cross-section.

In other words, the cross-section of the solid that is perpendicular to its base is in the shape of a triangle.

A triangular prism is a solid shape that has a triangular cross-section. If you were to take a vertical slice through the prism, the resulting two-dimensional shape would be a triangle.

Hence, if  vertical slice through a three-dimensional solid produces a two-dimensional shape is triangular prism

To learn more on Three dimensional figure click:

https://brainly.com/question/2400003

#SPJ2

Answer:3

Step-by-step explanation:

162 because ya I did that question

(a) is the correct answer.

One common mistake that many managers make when using a causal forecasting model such as linear and multiple regression is to assume that the correlation of variables proves that one variable has caused another variable. Option (a) is the correct answer.Linear regression, also known as simple regression, is a forecasting technique that analyzes the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. Multiple regression forecasting includes the use of many independent variables. The focus of regression analysis is to make predictions or decisions based on the results of the regression model.The dependent variable is the variable that is being forecasted or analyzed in regression analysis. It is referred to as the predicted or outcome variable. The independent variable is the variable that is believed to be responsible for the dependent variable's variation. It is also referred to as the explanatory variable.In regression analysis, correlation does not equate to causation. Managers should understand that the correlation between two variables does not imply that one variable caused the other. There might be a third variable that is causing both variables to vary. As a result, managers should be cautious when interpreting regression results because correlation does not equate to causation. Correlation can demonstrate the relationship between two variables, but it does not indicate causation.

Learn more about Variables

brainly.com/question/17344045

#SPJ11

Answer:

Option C.J'K'L'M' will still be a rectangle, angles are preserved opposites sides remain equal in lengths and parallel.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps...

have a great day!!

Answer:

0.00578 the answer is 0.0058