What is the perimeter of parallelogram WXYZ?

√5 +√17 units
2√5+ 2√17 units
16 units
22 units

Answer:

The answer is "\(\bold{(x,y)\longrightarrow (x-8, y-7)}\)".

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given question some data is missing. so, the correct answer to this can be explained in the following example:

In the given example, point D  is also known as the coordinates in the (2, 5), and in the coordination of the D prime (D') and after translation its co-ordinates value is (-6, -2). Since the very first choice is only accurate as:

⇒2-8 = -6

⇒ 5-7 = -2

It can try certain things too and see why this alone is the correct translation.  

The multiplication of the mixed fractions as 4²/₇ * 2¹/₅ gives; 9³/₇

A mixed fraction is one that has a part that is a whole number and a part that is a proper fraction.

Now, a proper fraction has its' numerator lesser than its' denominator while an improper fraction has it's numerator greater than its' denominator.

Let us convert each fraction into an improper fraction before multiplication.

4²/₇ = 30/7

2¹/₅ = 11/5

Thus, we have;

30/7 * 11/5

This can be reduced to;

66/7 which can be converted back to a mixed fraction to get 9³/₇

Read more about Multiplication of fractions at; https://brainly.com/question/1052420

#SPJ1

Answer:

C.

represent 0

hope it helps

In the given scenario ladder is 6.52 feet long.

Given that,

The angle between ground and ladder = 62 degree

The distance of ladder from ground and ladder = 3 feet

We have to find the length of  ladder.

Since we know that,

The trigonometric ratio

cosθ = adjacent/ Hypotenuse

Here we have,

Adjacent =  3 feet

Hypotenuse = length of ladder

Thus to find the length of ladder we have to find the value of hypotenuse.

Therefore,

⇒ cos62 = 3/ Hypotenuse

⇒    0.46 = 3/ Hypotenuse

⇒ Hypotenuse =  3/0.46

                          = 6.52

Thus,

length of ladder  = 6.52 feet.

Learn more about the triangle visit;

brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ1

The given statement "A successful proof can indeed turn a conditional statement into a theorem.'' is true because a successful proof can transform a conditional statement into a theorem by providing a logical and rigorous demonstration of its truth based on the given hypothesis.

In mathematics, a conditional statement is a proposition that asserts a relationship between two or more mathematical objects or concepts. It consists of a hypothesis and a conclusion.

A conditional statement is typically expressed in the form "If A, then B," where A represents the hypothesis and B represents the conclusion.

To establish a conditional statement as a theorem, one needs to provide a valid proof that demonstrates the truth of the statement. A proof is a logical argument that follows a series of logical deductions from axioms, definitions, and previously established theorems.

When a proof is successfully constructed for a conditional statement, it provides rigorous justification for the truth of the conclusion based on the given hypothesis.

By demonstrating the logical validity and coherence of the argument, the proof confirms the truth of the conditional statement and establishes it as a theorem.

The process of proving a conditional statement involves carefully reasoning through logical steps, utilizing mathematical principles and logical inference rules.

It requires precise and accurate reasoning, ensuring that each step in the proof is valid and consistent with the underlying mathematical framework.

Once a conditional statement has been proven, it is elevated to the status of a theorem. Theorems are fundamental results in mathematics that have been rigorously proven and hold true within a given mathematical system.

They serve as building blocks for further mathematical investigations and form the foundation of mathematical knowledge.

In summary, a successful proof can transform a conditional statement into a theorem by providing a logical and rigorous demonstration of its truth based on the given hypothesis.

To know more about conditional statement refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14457027#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The cake recipe calls for 1 cup of buttermilk. 1 cup is equivalent to approximately 8 fluid ounces or 240 milliliters of buttermilk.

In baking, measurements are typically given in terms of cups, tablespoons, or teaspoons. When a recipe calls for "1 cup" of buttermilk, it means that you need to use one standard measuring cup to measure out the buttermilk. A standard measuring cup holds approximately 8 fluid ounces or 240 milliliters. Therefore, in the context of the cake recipe, "1 cup" of buttermilk refers to 8 fluid ounces or 240 milliliters of buttermilk.

Buttermilk is a slightly thick and tangy dairy product that is commonly used in baking. It adds moisture and acidity to recipes, resulting in a tender and flavorful baked good. When measuring buttermilk for a recipe, it's important to use the correct amount to achieve the desired texture and taste. So, in this particular recipe, you would need to use one standard measuring cup filled with buttermilk, which is equivalent to 8 fluid ounces or 240 milliliters.

Learn more about cake recipe

brainly.com/question/15547901

#SPJ11

CI = 6.76 ± 1.96 × (2.67/√50)
CI = 6.76 ± 0.96
Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the population means rating for Miami is: (5.80, 7.72)

We can be 95% confident that the true mean rating for Miami International Airport falls within this interval.
To develop a 95% confidence interval for the population means rating for Miami International Airport, we need to follow these steps:

1. Calculate the sample mean (x) by adding up all the ratings and dividing by the sample size (n=50).
2. Calculate the sample standard deviation (s).
3. Use a t-distribution to find the t-score for a 95% confidence interval with (n-1) degrees of freedom.
4. Calculate the margin of error (ME) using the t-score, standard deviation, and sample size.
5. Add and subtract the margin of error from the sample mean to find the lower and upper limits of the confidence interval.

To calculate the 95% confidence interval, we need to use the formula:
CI = x ± Z' (s/√n)
Where:
x = sample mean
Z' = z-score for the desired confidence level (in this case, 95%, so

Z' = 1.96)
s = sample standard deviation
n = sample size

Step 1: Calculate the sample mean (x)
Sum of ratings = 346
Sample size (n) = 50
x = 346/50 = 6.92

Step 2: Calculate the sample standard deviation (s)
Variance = [(Sum of (rating - x)^2) / (n-1)] = 88.48
Standard deviation (s) = √(88.48) = 9.41

Step 3: Find the t-score
For a 95% confidence interval with 49 (n-1) degrees of freedom, the t-score is approximately 2.01.

Step 4: Calculate the margin of error (ME)
ME = t-score × (s / √n) = 2.01 × (9.41 / √50) = 2.01 × 1.33 = 2.67

Step 5: Find the confidence interval
Lower limit: x - ME = 6.92 - 2.67 = 5.80
Upper limit: x + ME = 6.92 + 2.67 = 7.72

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the population mean rating for Miami International Airport is approximately

(5.80, 7.72)

Learn more about confidence intervals:

brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:multiple types of numbers have been shown in so 467x it will be 873

The correct answer is: B. The matrix A is invertible because it is row equivalent to I and therefore the row reduced columns of A form a basis for R3 by the Invertible Matrix Theorem.

The Invertible Matrix Theorem states that a square matrix is invertible (or non-singular) if and only if it is row equivalent to the identity matrix. In other words, a matrix is invertible if it can be transformed into the identity matrix through a sequence of elementary row operations.

Based on the given information, matrix A is row equivalent to the identity matrix I, which means that it can be transformed into I through elementary row operations. This implies that matrix A is invertible.

Additionally, the row reduced columns of A, which are the columns of the identity matrix I, form a basis for R3. A basis for a vector space is a set of vectors that are linearly independent and span the entire vector space. Since the row reduced columns of A form a basis for R3, it means that they are linearly independent and can generate any vector in R3.

Therefore, option B, which states that the matrix A is invertible because it is row equivalent to I and the row reduced columns of A form a basis for R3, is the correct answer.

To know more about Correct visit-

brainly.com/question/30803782

#SPJ11

Answer:

Ok so this is not a function.

However i'm not real sure about domain and range because i'm not sure what you can do in those boxes but this is a guess.

Hope this helps though!:)

Domain: -3, -2, -1, 0

Range: 12, 13, 14, 15

The amount of candle burn after 6 hours is 4.95 inches.

What is the total amount?

Total refers to an entire or complete amount, and the verb "to total" means to combine two numbers or to destroy anything. In mathematics, you add integers to get the total; the outcome is the total.

Here, we have

Given that the 9-inch candle burns in 6 hours.

We know that we first have to calculate how 1 hour how much candles will burn.

Candle burn in 1 hour is :

= 9 / 10

= 0.9 inch

Now,

To find out how far the candle burnt after 6 hours we need to multiply the part of the candle burned by one hour by 11/2 hours.

= 11/2 × 0.9

= 4.95 inches

Hence, the amount of candle burn after 6 hours is 4.95 inches.

To learn more about the total amount from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/26670496

#SPJ1

Answer:B

Step-by-step explanation:

B because 3 is still x answers are just flipped

Given the system of equations:

x + y - z = 4 eq.(1)

3x + 2y + 4z = 17 eq.(2)

-x + 5y + z = 8 eq.(3)

Add the equations 1 and 3

so,

x + y - z + ( -x + 5y + z ) = 4 + 8

x + y - z - x + 5y + z = 12

6y = 12

y = 12/6 = 2

Substitute with y at eq. (1)

So,

x + 2 - z = 4

x - z = 4 - 2

x - z = 2 eq. (4)

Substitute with y at eq.(2)

3x + 2 * 2 + 4z = 17

3x + 4 + 4z = 17

3x + 4z = 17 - 4

3x + 4z = 13 eq.(5)

solve the equations (4) and (5) together

x - z = 2

3x + 4z = 13

Multiply [ x - z = 2 ] by 4

4x - 4z = 8

3x + 4z = 13

Add the last two equations

4x - 4z + 3x + 4z = 8 + 13

7x = 21

Divide both sides by 7

x = 21/7 = 3

So, x = 3 and y = 2

Substitute with the values of x and y at the equation [ -x + 5y + z = 8 ]

So,

-3 + 5 * 2 + z = 8

solve for z

-3 + 10 + z = 8

z = 8 + 3 - 10

z = 11 - 10 = 1

So,

x = 3 , y = 2 and z = 1

The task is to factorize the given number N = 13589. By finding the prime factors of N, we can break the RSA encryption.

To factorize N = 13589, we can try to divide it by prime numbers starting from 2 and check if any division results in a whole number. By using a prime factorization algorithm or a computer program, we can determine the prime factors of N. Dividing 13589 by 2, we get 13589 ÷ 2 = 6794.5, which is not a whole number. Continuing with the division, we can try the next prime number, 3. However, 13589 ÷ 3 is also not a whole number. We need to continue dividing by prime numbers until we find a factor or reach the square root of N. In this case, we find that N is not divisible by any prime number smaller than its square root, which is approximately 116.6. Since we cannot find a factor of N by division, it suggests that N is a prime number itself. Therefore, we cannot factorize N = 13589 using simple division. It means that the RSA encryption with this particular N value is secure against factorization using basic methods. Please note that factorizing large prime numbers is computationally intensive and requires advanced algorithms and significant computational resources.

Learn more about prime factorization here:

https://brainly.com/question/29763746

#SPJ11

Answer:

720

Step-by-step explanation:

6*5*4*3*2=720

The probability that the jury makes the correct decision is approximately 0.7063.

To solve this problem, we need to find the probability that the jury makes the correct decision if the defendant is guilty. Let's break down the problem into smaller steps.

We know that the probability of a single juror making the correct decision is 0.80. If the defendant is guilty, then the probability of a juror making the correct decision is still 0.80. Therefore, the probability that a single juror makes the correct decision if the defendant is guilty is 0.80.

We can use the binomial distribution formula to determine the probability of at least 10 out of 12 jurors making the correct decision. The formula is:

P(X ≥ k) = 1 - Σ(i=0 to k-1) [n!/(i!(n-i)!) x \(p^i \times (1-p)^{(n-i)}\) ]

where:

P(X ≥ k) is the probability of at least k successes

n is the total number of trials (in this case, 12 jurors)

p is the probability of success in a single trial (in this case, 0.80)

k is the number of successes we want to find the probability of (in this case, 10)

Plugging in the values, we get:

P(X ≥ 10) = 1 - Σ(i=0 to 9) [12!/(i!(12-i)!) x \(0.80^i \times (1-0.80)^{(12-i)}\)]

Using a calculator or software, we can calculate this to be approximately 0.7063.

To know more about probability here

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Whether or not 24 is a possible output value depends on the specific function in question. To determine if 24 is a possible output value, we need to analyze the domain and range of the function.

The domain of a function refers to the set of all possible input values for the function. Without further information about the function, we cannot determine the domain. However, if the function is defined for all real numbers, then 24 can be a possible input value.

The range of a function refers to the set of all possible output values. Again, without additional information about the function, we cannot determine the range. However, if the function is defined for all real numbers, then 24 can be a possible output value.
In summary, whether or not 24 is a possible output value depends on the specific function and its domain and range.

To know more about specific function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33712569

#SPJ11

Without additional information about the specific function, it is not possible to determine if 24 is a possible output value. Similarly, the description of the domain and range of the function would require more details about its definition.

The question asks if 24 is a possible output value for a given function, and to describe the domain and range of the function.

To determine if 24 is a possible output value, we need more information about the specific function. Without this information, we cannot say for certain if 24 is a possible output. The function's equation or a given set of inputs and outputs would be needed to make a definitive conclusion.

However, in general, a function can have any number of possible output values depending on its definition. For example, a function that squares its input will always produce a positive output, so 24 would not be a possible output for that particular function. On the other hand, a function that doubles its input will have 24 as a possible output if the input is 12.

Moving on to the domain and range of a function, the domain refers to the set of all possible input values, while the range refers to the set of all possible output values. Again, without more information about the specific function, it is challenging to describe the domain and range accurately.

In general, the domain can be determined by identifying any restrictions on the input values. For example, if the function involves taking the square root of a number, the domain would be all non-negative real numbers. The range, on the other hand, can be determined by examining the possible output values. For instance, if the function outputs only positive numbers, the range would be all positive real numbers.

Learn more about domain and range from the link:

https://brainly.com/question/2264373

#SPJ11

A) the three inequalities that must be satisfied are:

B) Graph shaded and satisfying all conditions is attached.

An inequality in mathematics is a relationship that makes a non-equal comparison between two integers or other mathematical expressions.

It is most commonly used to compare the sizes of two numbers on a number line.

Learn more about Inequality:
https://brainly.com/question/29773201
#SPJ1

The least-squares estimate of β0 under the assumption of β1 = 0 is given by the mean of the observed response variable Yi.

(a) If β1 = 0 in the simple linear regression model Yi = β0 + β1Xi + Ei, it implies that the coefficient β1, which represents the slope of the regression line, is zero. There is no linear relationship between the predictor variable Xi and the response variable Yi.

When β1 = 0, the regression function simplifies to Yi = β0 + Ei. The regression function becomes a horizontal line with a constant value β0. The value of Yi does not depend on the value of Xi since the slope is zero. The regression line becomes a flat line parallel to the x-axis, indicating that there is no relationship between the predictor variable Xi and the response variable Yi.

The regression function when β1 = 0 would result in a scatter plot of the data points and a horizontal line at the level β0, representing the predicted value for all values of Xi. The line would have a constant height (Y-value) equal to β0, indicating that the response variable does not change with changes in the predictor variable.

(b) Under the assumption of β1 = 0, the least-squares estimate of β0. In simple linear regression, the least-squares estimate of β0 can be obtained by minimizing the sum of squared residuals.

The sum of squared residuals (SSR) is given by:

SSR = Σ[ i=1 to n ] (Yi - Yi)²,

where Yi represents the observed response variable, Yi represents the predicted response variable based on the regression model, and n is the total number of data points.

When β1 = 0, the predicted response variable Yi simplifies to Yi = β0. Substituting this into the SSR equation:

SSR = Σ[ i=1 to n ] (Yi - β0)².

The least-squares estimate of β0 the SSR equation with respect to β0 and set it equal to zero to minimize the sum of squared residuals:

d/dβ0 (SSR) = -2Σ[ i=1 to n ] (Yi - β0) = 0.

Simplifying the equation:

Σ[ i=1 to n ] (Yi - β0) = 0.

Expanding the sum:

Σ[ i=1 to n ] Yi - nβ0 = 0.

Rearranging the equation:

Σ[ i=1 to n ] Yi = nβ0.

Finally, solving for β0:

β0 = (1/n) Σ[ i=1 to n ] Yi.

To know more about squares here

https://brainly.com/question/30556035

#SPJ4

Answer:

f(x) = x - 3

Step-by-step explanation:

note that y = f(x) , then

x - y = 3 ( add y to both sides )

x = 3 + y ( subtract 3 from both sides )

x - 3 = y , that is

f(x) = x - 3

f(x) = x - 3  is the equation written in function notation, with x as the independent variable.

A relationship between a group of inputs and one output is referred to as a function. In plain English, a function is an association between inputs in which each input is connected to precisely one output. A domain, codomain, or range exists for every function. Typically, f(x), where x is the input, is used to represent a function.

To write the equation x - y = 3 in function notation with x as the independent variable, we need to solve for y in terms of x.

x - y = 3

y = x - 3

Therefore, the function represented by the equation x - y = 3, with x as the independent variable, can be written in function notation as:

f(x) = x - 3

So the answer is O f(x) = x - 3.

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/29633660

#SPJ7

Answer:

what is the question?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: nice going Len

Step-by-step explanation:

What's he gonna do with all the tea

Answer:

132

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: V = 66

Step-by-step explanation:

the probability of baby Maggie being right-handed given that she predominantly turns her head to the left is 1 - 0.1 = 0.9, or 90%.

The doctor's claim that an infant who predominantly turns their head to the right while lying on their back will be right-handed and vice versa has not been scientifically proven. However, assuming the accuracy of the test is 90%, we can calculate the probability of baby Maggie being right-handed given that she predominantly turns her head to the left.
If 90% of the population is right-handed, then the probability of a random person being right-handed is 0.9. The complement of this is the probability of a person being left-handed, which is 0.1.
If we assume that the test is accurate, then the probability of baby Maggie being left-handed given that she predominantly turns her head to the left is also 0.1.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/31120123

#SPJ11