Answer:
Medical expertise is crucial in death investigations. It begins with body examination and evidence collection at the scene and proceeds through history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and diagnosis – in short, the broad ingredients of a doctor's treatment of a living patient.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
differentiating economics activity 1.3.3 please help
1). How does trade with Europe affects the United States economy? ⇒ Macroeconomic
2). How does a retailer determine the price of socks? ⇒ Microeconomic
3). Is it better to take the babysitting job or stay unemployed?⇒ Microeconomic
4). Should the minimum wage be increased? ⇒ Macroeconomic
5). How does the national debt impact employment? ⇒ Macroeconomic
What is microeconomic and macroeconomic?
Microeconomics refers to the study of the economic behaviors of individuals, households, and companies.
Macroeconomics refers to the study a national economy as a whole. It focuses on issues that affect the nations and the world economy.
Basically, both the microeconomic and macroeconomics are the economic terms that studies the economy at different levels.
Learn more about microeconomic and macroeconomic here:-
https://brainly.com/question/13120341
#SPJ1
This is my homework and it is due in 4 hours. I will put it in the comment of this question. I will give brainliest.
-edit: I don't need it. I already know the answers.
Answer:
great go ahead
you did great
HELP MEEE PLEASE IT WAS DUE YESTERDAYY!!!! ILL WILL YOU BRANLIEST ANSWER!!
AND CAN YOU MAKE THE ANSWERS LONG!!
What is rehabilitation?
What types of rehabilitation do we have in place?
Who qualifiies for it?
What individuals is this for?
Answer: 1. The restoration of former rights, authority, or abilities. The process of rehabilitating a witness involves restoring the credibility of the witness following Impeachment by the opposing party. Rehabilitating a prisoner refers to preparing him or her for a productive life upon release from prison. 2. The three main types of rehabilitation therapy are occupational, physical and speech. Each form of rehabilitation serves a unique purpose in helping a person reach full recovery, but all share the ultimate goal of helping the patient return to a healthy and active lifestyle. 3. To qualify for federally funded vocational rehabilitation, you must: have a physical or mental condition that causes a “substantial impediment” to your ability to work, and. be able to benefit from VR services so that you can get a job. 4. for people who are in court. brainliest?
Explanation:
Pick one
Option 1: Schools should require masks at all times no matter what, and take temperature at door.
option 2: Schools may require masks when standed up and when they are seated they take them off, socially distanced from others and a shield around there desk, when at recess they may take off there mask since outside and socially distanced from others. And before they leave or enter the school they take there temperature at the door.
(I pick option one also fyi just a question.
Answer:
option 2
Explanation:
the second one is more explanitory
Answer:
mostly option one with strict guidelines of option two
Explanation:
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
The statement below is from Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Which characteristic of rule of law and which type of law are best represented by this statement?
Fair procedures and juvenile law
Transparency of institutions and civil law
Enforcement of the law and military law
Accountability to the law and constitutional law
The characteristic of rule of law and type of law that are best represented by the given statement is: Accountability to the law and constitutional law. The correct option is D.
The statement declares that the President, Vice President, and all civil authorities of the United declares can be impeached and removed from office as a measure of accountability for their actions.
Constitutional law establishes the basic framework of the government, specifies the powers and responsibilities of its branches, and lays out the procedures for key actions such as impeachment.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about constitutional law here:
https://brainly.com/question/14918421
#SPJ3
The complete question might be:
The statement below is from Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Which characteristic of rule of law and which type of law are best represented by this statement?
A Fair procedures and juvenile law
B Transparency of institutions and civil law
C Enforcement of the law and military law
D Accountability to the law and constitutional law
Most societies contain diverse and sometimes conflicting elements within them.
O True
O False
The statement that "Most societies contain diverse and sometimes conflicting elements within them," is True.
How are societies diverse ?Most societies are diverse and contain different groups with distinct cultural, economic, political, and social characteristics. These groups may have conflicting interests, values, and beliefs, and may compete for resources and power within society.
As a result, social tensions and conflicts can arise, and societies may struggle to maintain social cohesion and stability. However, societies also have mechanisms for resolving conflicts, negotiating differences, and promoting cooperation and collaboration among different groups.
Find out more on diversity at https://brainly.com/question/12407924
#SPJ1
If Anton is charged with a crime and sued in a civil action, how would the civil case
differ from the criminal trial? Please explain.
Answer:NO
Explanation:
The correct answer is NO.
If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together because civil law doesn't involve criminal matters and procedures in civil and criminal trials are very different.
There are lawsuits for different cases, if Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
What is civil action?
The civil action is a lawsuit for noncriminal actions that started with a complaint. this lawsuit usually involves private parties.
Since Anton's case is a criminal case, the case not be tried in a civil action because they don't involve criminal matters. Also, procedures in civil and criminal trials are different.
Therefore, If Anton is charged with a crime and is sued in a civil action, the civil and criminal cases would NOT be tried together.
Learn more on civil action here,
brainly.com/question/499624
Why should Mr. Romeri be responsible for Mrs. Conley’s emotional happiness?
Alex buys a stolen mp3 player from kara. Alex knows the property he possesses is stolen. What is his culpable mental state?
A. Criminal Negligence
B. Reckless
C. Knowingly
D. Intentional
C. Knowingly. Alex is aware that the mp3 player he bought is stolen, indicating a culpable mental state of knowledge regarding the stolen property.
Alex's culpable mental state in this scenario is C. Knowingly. Here's a step-by-step explanation:
Alex buys a stolen mp3 player from Kara, which means he acquires possession of an item known to be stolen.To determine Alex's culpable mental state, we need to assess what he knew at the time of purchasing the stolen mp3 player.The prompt clearly states that Alex knows the property he possesses is stolen. This knowledge indicates his mental state regarding the stolen nature of the mp3 player.Knowingly refers to a culpable mental state where a person is aware and conscious that their actions or possession are illegal or against the law.In this case, Alex knowingly buys the stolen mp3 player, demonstrating his awareness of the property's stolen status.Therefore, Alex's culpable mental state is C. Knowingly, as he possesses the mp3 player with full knowledge of its stolen nature.
The right answer is option 3. knowingly
For more such on culpable mental state
https://brainly.com/question/28706288
#SPJ8
Carlos is a forensic entomologist who is asked to help with a high-profile murder. How is Carlos MOST likely going to contribute to the investigation?
A. by determining the time of death
B. by hypothesizing the cause of death
C. by finding the motive of the murderer
D. by collecting the fingerprints from the scene
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
I think it’s a because the other ones do not really make sense for the answer as well as what the question is asking.
What does voir dire mean? A. Jury selection B. Plea bargain C. Probable cause or D. Motions
Answer:
A- jury selection
Explanation:
Are U.S secret service and FBI in the same federal department
A. Yes
B. No
Answer:
b. no⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Answer:
B. No
Explanation:
The U.S. Secret Service and the FBI are both premier federal law enforcement agencies that specialize in protection and investigation, but they approach these functions differently.
Aside from the president, who else has the authority to enact an executive order?
A). state governors
B). law enforcement officials
C). no one else
D). senators
only the president can enact an executive order
Answer:
C. No one else.
Explanation:
Only the president has the authority to enact an executive order.
What are the ways in which media can ensure access of information to all communities
When is it hardest to see motorcyclists?
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head on, they take up so little of your visual field.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot.
d. All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them.
The hardest to see motorcyclists : All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them. Option D is the correct answer.
Motorcyclists can be difficult to see in various situations, and it is essential for drivers to be vigilant and actively look for them. Here's an explanation for each option:
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head-on, they take up so little of your visual field: Motorcycles have a narrower profile compared to other vehicles, making them less visible when approaching from the opposite direction. Due to their smaller size, they can be easily overlooked, especially if drivers are not actively scanning for them.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes: Motorcycles can be particularly challenging to spot on the freeway due to the high volume of traffic and frequent lane changes. The quick maneuverability of motorcycles allows them to navigate through traffic, but this also increases the risk of being overlooked by drivers who are not attentive or fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot: Motorcycles can easily fall into a driver's blind spot, which is an area not visible in the rear-view or side mirrors. It is crucial for drivers to check their blind spots by turning their heads and using proper mirror adjustment to ensure they are aware of any motorcyclists in their vicinity.
Option D is the correct answer.
For such more question on motorcyclists:
https://brainly.com/question/27196118
#SPJ8
19. Who was an important leader in the women's suffrage movement? (1 point)
Answer:
Susan B. Anthony, Alice Paul, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone and Ida B. Wells
Affirmative action was instituted to deal with discrimination. The intent of affirmative action is to repair past discrimination and current discrimination in education and employment and remains highly controversial.
In 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court made an important statement on affirmative action in the cases, Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. Summarize these cases.
What important statement did the Court make on the future of affirmative action?
Answer:
Affirmative action as a practice was partially upheld by the Supreme Court in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), while the use of racial quotas for college admissions was concurrently ruled unconstitutional by the Court in Gratz v. Bollinger (2003).
Affirmative Action – Advantages
Climbing the socioeconomic ladder. ...
Boosting the education of disadvantaged students. ...
Promoting education and work on a communal level. ...
Reverse discrimination. ...
Lack of meritocracy. ...
Demeaning true achievement. ...
Employment. ...
Education.
The Court's majority ruling, authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, held that the United States Constitution "does not prohibit the law school's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body."
Explanation:
1. Why do humans put off car maintenance?
O It's inconvenient
O It's expensive
O Our brains think it's a low priority
Answer:
it is expensive
Explanation:
it is expensive
The costs of addiction are felt in __ main areas of an individual’s life.
Answer:
hope it's helpful
and mark me as brainlist
and drop some thanks
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
As a student interested in law, crime, and corrections, how can you benefit from researching COMSTAT databases? Write a response of at least 150 words.
Answer:
Dr. Laura Wyckoff, Bureau of Justice Assistance FellowFocusing resources on high-crime places, high-rate offenders, and repeat victims can help police effectively reduce crime in their communities. Doing so …
Explanation:
Dr. Laura Wyckoff, Bureau of Justice Assistance FellowFocusing resources on high-crime places, high-rate offenders, and repeat victims can help police effectively reduce crime in their communities. Doing so …
anyone who marks me brainlist gets 100 POINTS!!!!!
Answer:
THANK U FOR THE PTS
Explanation:
HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY
George is 22 years old, single, and has just started his first job. He saves 5 percent of his monthly
income for retirement. Kirsten is 30 years old and married with two children. She will start saving 6
percent of her income for retirement when she turns 35. Which person will have more money at age 6
if all other factors are the same?
If all factor are the same,, George would have more money at age 60 since he started saving earlier.
Why are the US Military expenses so high financially?
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
Who was the first president of the United States?
You are eligible to get your Class E restricted license when you
are at least 16 years old and have had your Learner License for
at least. ___months.
9
2
6
12
Answer:
6 months
hey!
To apply for a provisional driver's license, a driver must be at least 16 and under 18 years old. The person must have held a learner's permit for at least six months prior to applying for a provisional driver's license.
The driver also must have at least 100 hours of driving experience supervised by a person at least 21 years of age who has had a valid driver's license for at least three years. Alternatively, the driver can complete a traffic safety education course and at least 50 hours of supervised driving experience.
hope that helps! :)
Answer:
The correct answer is 6 months.
Explanation:
MARK ME AS BRIANLIST
Dominique is working on a case that requires imaging software, specifically Forensic Toolkit. Which feature would Dominique be needing if she is using this software? A. file compression B. image editing C. hex editing D. IP tracing
Dominique is working on a case that requires imaging software, specifically the Forensic Toolkit (FTK). In this context, the feature she would most likely need is option C. hex editing.
Hex editing allows users to analyze and manipulate the binary data of a file, which is particularly useful in digital forensics investigations. With hex editing, Dominique can examine raw data and look for evidence that might not be easily visible through standard file viewers. This feature enables her to uncover hidden information or recover deleted data, both of which could be crucial for her case.
Although file compression (A), image editing (B), and IP tracing (D) might also be relevant in some scenarios, they are not the primary functions of forensic imaging software like FTK. File compression reduces the size of files, image editing manipulates graphics, and IP tracing helps track the origin of network connections, but none of these directly relate to the digital forensics capabilities that Dominique would require in her investigation.
In summary, Dominique would be needing hex editing as the main feature when using the Forensic Toolkit for her case, as it enables her to perform in-depth analysis and manipulation of binary data, essential for a digital forensics investigation. Therefore the correct option C
Know more about hex editing here:
https://brainly.com/question/31358544
#SPJ11
31. "Stand Your Ground" means what? (Read answer choices carefully)
If attacked, I do not have to run away, even if I can I can use self defense as a first
resort/option
O I have to stand put and use self defense if I'm attacked-I am not allowed to run away
o I can only use self defense on people who are running away
O
I cannot use self defense on people who are standing in one place and "holding their
ground."
Answer:
'Stand your ground' means ''I have to stand put and use self-defence when attacked - I am not allowed to run away'
Answer:
i mean its either "if attacked, I do not have to run away, even if I can I can use self defense as a first" or "I have to stand put and use self defense if I'm attacked-I am not allowed to run away"
Explanation: