Dwi penalties in New Mexico for Interlock
Which of the following would likely be considered only an infraction?
A. A parking violation by a driver with a previously perfect record
B. A violent crime under the aggravating circumstances of having
been provoked
C. An act of arson that led to the destruction of property, but not to
the physical harm of any person
D. A first act of shoplifting merchandise with a value of a few
hundred dollars
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Choices B-D are either criminal charges, or a misdemeanor. Someone with no previous record is likely to receive a warning (not even a citation/infraction).
Answer:
A. A parking violation by a driver with a previously perfect record
Write one paragraph (3-4 sentences) that answer the following 2 questions:
1. Why is it important for a society to have laws?
2. Provide examples of 2 laws that, in your opinion, are necessary to our way of life in the United States.
Why is fingerprint analysis not accurate in crime?
Answer:
It is only accurate if the criminal is already in the police database.
Explanation:
The print is matched with a fingerprint that is already in the system.
No one disputes that fingerprinting is a valuable and generally reliable police tool, but despite more than a century of use, fingerprinting has never been scientifically validated. This is significant because of the criteria governing the admission of scientific evidence in the US courts. Latent fingerprints, which are collected from crime scenes, have been used as courtroom evidence for decades. ... But there is little certainty that a set of fingerprints can reliably point to the right person, according to the report.
Creative commons-attribution is the free distribution of copyrighted work _____________ the proper credit to the creator.
A creative commons-attribution is the free distribution of copyrighted work with the proper credit to the creator.
What is a creative commons-attribution?It relates to a public copyright licenses that enable the free distribution of an otherwise copyrighted work.
The practice is that a creative commons license is acquired and used when an author wants to give other people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that the author has created.
Read more about creative commons
brainly.com/question/20893085
#SPJ1
Scenario:
A new piece of equipment has arrived and your supervisor is anxious to put it to use. You can usually figure out how to operate
equipment, but you've never used this before. Your supervisor hands you the manual and says, "Ok, get started!" As he walks off, he turns and says, "Oh, and be careful." You understand the urgency, but are nervous about using the new equipment.
Question:
Which of these employee rights might affect what you do? Select the rights you think are most relevant to your solution.
- Right to rules and regulation
- Right to training
- Right to non-retaliation
- Right to data access
- Right to promote safety
- Right to inspections
The following Scenario "Right to training" is the most relevant employee rights.
Rights are basic normative norms regarding what is permitted of individuals or due to people in accordance with some legal system, social custom, or ethical theory. Rights are therefore legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement. In fields like law and ethics, especially in notions of justice and deontology, rights are fundamentally important.
Any civilization must have rights, and attempts to define and reinterpret them frequently recur throughout social conflict history. Rights "determine the form of governments, the substance of laws, and the shape of morality as it is now viewed," according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
To know more about Rights here
https://brainly.com/question/2775117
#SPJ1
When you appeal the verdict of a trial court, what does the appellate court review?.
Answer: The side that files the appeal is called the "appellant." The other side is called the "respondent." If you appeal, the appellate court will review the trial court record to decide if a legal mistake was made in the trial court that changed the outcome of the case.
T/F. Criminal penalties can be imposed for violations of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA).
The statement "Criminal penalties can be imposed for violations of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)." is true as such penalties can be imposed.
Infractions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) may result in criminal sanctions. It is against the law to hire, recruit or recommend undocumented immigrants for employment under the IRCA a federal law. Penalties for violating the IRCA include both civil and criminal ones.
Employers who knowingly employ or continue to employ unauthorized workers may be charged criminally and may also be sentenced to jail time and fines. The law is intended to discourage and punish employers who knowingly employ people who are not authorized to work in the United States in violation of immigration laws.
Learn more about Immigration Reform and Control at:
brainly.com/question/3475789
#SPJ4
You are a prosecutor and are preparing for an upcoming trial. This is a case of arson, and the defendant is accused of setting fire to a barn, causing it to burn to the ground. You have an abundance of physical evidence that points to the defendant, but you also discover that a set of shoeprints found at the scene matches another suspect. This would be an example of what type of evidence?
Based on the information, the given case is an example of exculpatory evidence.
What is evidence?Evidence is referred to as proof or objects that provide factual information based on true events. This factual information helps to identify whether the events took place or not. it helps to validate the credibility of the sources.
In the given case, it is explained that you are a prosecutor getting ready for a trial that is coming up. There is a huge amount of physical evidence that supports the defendant, but you also learn that another suspect's shoeprints were also located at the scene.
Evidence that tends to minimize, or explain an accused's claimed wrongdoing is referred to as exculpatory evidence. In a criminal trial, any evidence that is beneficial to the defendant is regarded as exculpatory.
Learn more about Evidence, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ2
What was the result of the proposed amendments to the articles of confederation, made by chairman pinckney, in august of 1786?.
The recommendations of the committee were never implemented by Congress because they did not believe that all 13 states would approve the amendments.
The delegates gathered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at the Constitutional Convention to create the new Constitution that will govern the young country. The initial US Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, had numerous shortcomings and had left a weak central authority. The delegates were discussing and debating the new Constitution for this reason. Charles Pinckney represented South Carolina as a delegate. Congress agreed when requested in May 1786 to appoint a committee to study the Articles. The modifications were ready on August 7, 1786, but they were never adopted. The conference at Annapolis, Maryland, is the next phase.
learn more about articles confederation here:
https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
What does "salvaging redeemable offenders" mean?
the felony crime of ending a life by driving recklessly or while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs is the definition of____
Commonly referred to as vehicular manslaughter or vehicular murder, the felony offense of taking a life while operating a motor vehicle carelessly or when impaired by alcohol or other substances is a crime.
This offense is considered a serious crime, and the penalties can be severe, ranging from fines to imprisonment. Vehicular manslaughter can occur in different scenarios, including driving under the influence, reckless driving, or speeding.
In cases where the driver was under the influence of drugs or alcohol, the prosecution must prove that the driver's ability to operate a vehicle was impaired due to intoxication.
The elements of vehicular manslaughter typically include causing the death of another person while driving a vehicle in a negligent, reckless, or unlawful manner. The prosecution must also prove that the driver's conduct was the direct cause of the victim's death.
To learn more about vehicular manslaughter
https://brainly.com/question/4067535
#SPJ4
Alanis tries to talk her supervisor out of a business decision she thinks is unethical. Which of the following best characterizes her reaction?
a. loyalty.
b. capitulation.
c. voice.
d. exit.
Answer:
Definitely C!
Explanation:
..... .....
1. Critically discuss the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in the UK. Your discussion should include a comparison with the investigation and prosecution of on-line child abuse crime in ONE other country.
Marks are awarded for:
• Knowledge of methods of assessing seriousness of on-line child abuse, for example, the COPINE Index and Sentencing Advisory Panel scale.
• Knowledge of key legislation providing for on-line child abuse offences taking account of technological capabilities.
• Ability to critically compare effectiveness of methods for investigating and prosecuting on-line child abuse offences in the UK and ONE other country.
Answer:
I think abuse is bad
Explanation:
honey im not going to write an essay sry I have college to do and IM going to a bts concert sry
Tom attacked Kathy in the parking lot of a bar. He knocked her to the ground and stole her purse, breaking her arm in the process. Kathy works as a data input specialist at a bank and missed eight weeks of work due to her injury. Discuss how her case could be handled under both the criminal and civil law systems, including possible remedies available under each system.
Answer and Explanation:
Under criminal and civil law, Kathy would be entitled to compensation for lost wages and expenses for looking after her broken arm, while Tom should be penalized with incarceration and/or fines.
This would happen because the criminal understands Tom's actions as a crime and calls Tom a criminal who must be punished and held responsible for his actions. Civil law, on the other hand, puts Kathy in the position of a victim who has been harmed by criminal acts. All Kathy's physical and economic injuries must be compensated.
What personal story does Lou share to illustrate the broken judicial system at work? Explain and analyze why this story speaks to her point. If you watch the "ted talk" would you please answer this question?
Answer:
The answer is espanol is a language and is the 3rd most commonly spoken language.
if the authorized mode of communication is the mail, then an acceptance becomes valid when it is dispatched (placed in the control of the u.s. postal service). this is called:
In the context where the authorized mode of communication is mail, an acceptance becomes valid when it is dispatched, or placed in the control of the U.S. Postal Service. This principle is known as the "dispatch rule."
The dispatch rule is a legal principle that governs the timing of acceptance in contracts when mail is the authorized mode of communication.
According to this rule, once an acceptance is properly prepared and placed in the control of the U.S. Postal Service, it becomes legally effective. In other words, the acceptance is considered valid and binding at the moment it is dispatched, even if it hasn't been received by the other party yet.
This rule is based on the idea that when parties agree to use mail as a method of communication, they implicitly agree that acceptance occurs upon dispatch, as long as the acceptance is properly addressed, stamped, and handed over to the postal service.
Learn more about communication here: brainly.com/question/29811467
#SPJ11
A painter entered into a valid contract with a mayor to paint his portrait for $5,000. The contract provided that, rather than paying the painter, the mayor was to pay the $5,000 to the painter's son. The contract also prohibited the assignment of any rights or duties arising under the contract without the permission of the other party.
Subsequently, the son, upon learning of the contract from his mother, decided to donate this money to a charity and transferred his rights under the contract to the charity without securing the permission of the mayor. The painter painted the portrait, but the mayor did not pay anyone. The charity filed suit against the mayor for breach of contract. The charity has taken no action nor incurred any expenses related to the contract.
Will the charity prevail in its action against the mayor?
A.Yes, because the charity was an assignee of the son's contractual rights.
B.Yes, because the charity is a donee beneficiary of the contract.
C.No, because the charity has not detrimentally relied on the mayor's promise.
D.No, because the contract prohibits assignments.
Under the terms of the contract, the mayor was required to pay the painter's son instead of the painter himself. The contract also prohibited the assignment of any rights or duties without the other party's permission.
Since the contract explicitly prohibits assignment, the transfer of the son's rights to the charity was invalid. Therefore, the charity cannot claim any rights under the contract. The fact that the charity has not taken any action or incurred any expenses related to the contract is irrelevant because the charity does not have standing to bring a breach of contract action against the mayor.
Option A, that the charity will prevail because it was an assignee of the son's contractual rights, is incorrect because the contract expressly prohibits assignment. Option B, that the charity is a donee beneficiary of the contract, is incorrect because there is no indication in the facts that the contract was intended to benefit any third party. Option C, that the charity cannot prevail because it has not detrimentally relied on the mayor's promise, is incorrect because detrimental reliance is not at issue in this case.
To know more about Mayor visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/15839614
#SPJ11
What are some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities?
Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.
- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.
- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.
- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.
These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.
For more such questions on colonization, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27868020
#SPJ8
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
this isn’t a homework question, but is it legal for a teacher to throw markers, erasers, and books at students? my science teacher did that last year and he also uses cuss words all the time. can that get him fired?
How can it be said that russia was the only dominating force in the USSR
It would not be accurate to say that Russia was the only dominating force in the USSR.
While Russia was the largest and most populous republic within the Soviet Union, the Soviet government was a federal system in which power was supposed to be shared among the 15 republics that made up the USSR.
In practice, the Soviet government was dominated by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), which was based in Moscow and controlled by Russians. As a result, Russia had significant influence over the Soviet government and the policies that were implemented.
The Soviet military was dominated by Russians, with the Soviet army being largely composed of Russian soldiers and officers. This gave Russia a significant amount of control over the military, which was a crucial tool in maintaining Soviet power.
The other republics within the Soviet Union also held significant power and influence. For example, Ukraine was home to much of the Soviet Union's agricultural output, and Kazakhstan was an important source of raw materials. These republics had some leverage in Soviet decision-making.
Learn more about USSR here:
https://brainly.com/question/31069636
#SPJ4
The President is able to make key military decisions. President Obama authorized the mission to go in to Pakistan to capture Bin Laden because he is
Commander in Chief
Chief of State
Chief Legislator
Chief Diplomat
Answer:
Commander in chief
explain the importance of obtaining and calculating data when working to implement a new program or policy
URGENT 50 POINTS
When deciding whether to refer a juvenile to the courts, law enforcement officers will often consider which factor?
A.
where the juvenile or their parents work
B.
how much money the family has for bail
C.
the likelihood that the juvenile will enter foster care
D.
prior police encounters and seriousness of the delinquency
Answer:
D. prior police encounters and seriousness of the delinquency
Explanation:
(the others seem a bit bias) please let me know if I am wrong :}
is the property of being physically or mentally capable.
A . Grit
B. Individualism
C. Self confidence
D. Strength
Answer:
D.Strength
ALL done
the basis for zoning and other land use control laws is:
The basis for zoning and other land use control laws is to regulate and control the use and development of land in order to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
Zoning laws typically divide a jurisdiction, such as a city or county, into different zones or districts, each with specific permitted uses, restrictions, and requirements. This helps to ensure that incompatible land uses are separated and that the overall character and quality of the community are preserved. Zoning laws may also regulate factors such as building heights, setbacks, parking requirements, and other aspects of development.
Other land use control laws, such as environmental regulations and building codes, also serve to protect public health, safety, and welfare by regulating the impact of development on the environment and ensuring that buildings are constructed to meet certain standards for safety and quality.
Learn more about development here:
https://brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ11
the doctrine that is applied when a defendant violates an existing statute intended to prevent the injury in question to persons of a class that includes the plaintiff is:
The doctrine of negligence per se is used when a defendant transgresses a law that was put in place to protect people in the plaintiff's class from the alleged harm.
What exactly is negligence per se?In cases of negligence, it is necessary to demonstrate that there was a duty, that duty was violated, and that the violation resulted in damages. It is not possible to sue someone for negligence in isolation. However, negligence as a whole takes on the obligation due to public law or policy.
According to legal scholars, "negligence per se" is "negligence resulting from the breach of a public duty under a law that defines the failure of care required to constitute negligence." It is also considered negligence per se when a person acts or refrains from acting in a manner that is so at variance with reasonable behavior standards as to be negligent on its face.
Learn more about negligence per se with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/1445831
#SPJ4
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
Two key requirements for proposed rules or regulations include ______.
notice and hearing
notice and adjudication
notice and appeal
notice and comment
Answer:
I do think that 'notice and hearing' is the suitable option!