What is the equation for "What number is 3% of 200"

Answer:

(P/2)-6

because its is perimeter you need to add the sides so the answer is (P/2)-6

Hence , the shading of the linear inequalities 9y - 2 < 13 and 3y - > -29 is given below.

The graph of the equation 9y - 2 < 13  equation (1) is represented by green colour and graph of the equation  3y - > -29  equation (2) is represented by yellow colour .

Learn more about inequality here :

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ9

The complete question is given below :

Shade the graph of 9y - 2 < 13 and 3y - > -29 .

The reasoning presented lacks explicit explanations and logical connections between the steps, making it difficult to fully understand the intended proof strategy.

The given proof aims to show that the Separation Axioms can be derived from the Replacement Schema using a particular construction involving a formula p(x, y). Let's analyze the proof step by step:

Define the formula p(x, y) as x = yo(x).

This formula states that for each x, y pair, x is equal to the unique object y such that y is obtained by applying the operation o to x.

Define the set F as {(x, x) (x)}.

This set F contains pairs (x, x) where x is the unique object obtained by applying the operation (x) to x.

Claim: F(X) = {y (x = X)p(x, y)} = {y: (x = X)x = y^o(x)} = {x: (3x € X)o(x)} = {x X: (x)}.

This claim asserts that F(X) is equivalent to {y (x = X)p(x, y)}, which is further equivalent to {y: (x = X)x = y^o(x)}, and so on.

The proof states that since (x, y) satisfies the functional formula VaVyVz(p(x, y)^(x, z) y = z), it follows that (x, y) is a functional formula.This step emphasizes that the formula p(x, y) satisfies certain properties that make it a functional formula, which is relevant for the subsequent deductions.

Finally, the proof concludes that the Separation Axioms follow from the Replacement Schema, based on the previous steps.

For more such questions on explicit

https://brainly.com/question/30394385

#SPJ8

Answer:

9

Step by Step Explanation:

To make a regular polygon with 96 sides we can take a circle as a starting point and divide it into 96 equal sides.

To create a regular polygon with 96 sides, we must take into account that all its sides must be equal, so we can take a circumference as a starting point. In this case, the circumference has 360°, so we must divide this into 96 parts and the result would be the distance between the edges of the polygon.

In this case, we must make a circle with a protractor and mark every 3.75°, when we have completed this procedure in the entire circumference we will have a regular polygon with 96 sides.

Learn more about polygons at: https://brainly.com/question/24464711

#SPJ1

Answer:

1.53

Step-by-step explanation:

1

36

(

85

)

+

(

35

36

)

(

−

4

)

=

E

V

85

36

−

140

36

=

E

V

−

55

36

=

E

V

E

V

≈

−

$

1.53

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-8/3

Step-by-step explanation:

since it's going downwards it's negative and it does 4y by x square so it would be -8/3

, hope it helps

Answer:  D is the answer. trust me.

Step-by-step explanation:

The problem that could be solved using the equation 10x+5=35 is option D: After a $5 discount, an order of 10 items cost $35. How much did each item cost?

To solve this problem, we can use the equation 10x + 5 = 35, where x represents the cost of each item. The $5 discount reduces the total cost of the 10 items by $5, so the total cost of the 10 items before the discount would be 10x. Therefore, we can set up the equation:

10x + 5 = 35

Subtracting 5 from both sides, we get:

10x = 30

Dividing both sides by 10, we get:

x = 3

So, each item cost $3 before the discount.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The absolute value of the elevation difference between the valley and sea level is 94 feet.

The absolute value of a number is the distance of that number from zero on the number line. It represents the magnitude or size of a quantity without considering its direction. In the given scenario, we are dealing with the elevation difference between a valley and sea level.

The valley is described as being 94 feet below sea level. To find the absolute value of the elevation difference, we need to ignore the negative sign and consider the magnitude of the difference.

In this case, since the valley is below sea level, the elevation difference is negative. However, when we take the absolute value, we disregard the negative sign and focus solely on the numerical value of the difference.

By applying the absolute value to the elevation difference of -94 feet, we remove the negative sign and consider only the magnitude. Thus, the absolute value of -94 is simply 94.

Therefore, the absolute value of the elevation difference between the valley and sea level is 94 feet. It indicates that the valley is 94 feet away from sea level in terms of elevation, regardless of the direction (above or below sea level). The absolute value provides a measure of the magnitude of the difference while disregarding the direction or sign associated with it.

For more such questions on absolute value , Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12928519

#SPJ11

Answer:

0 liters

Step-by-step explanation:

The first step in solving this problem is to find the volume of water that was originally in the tank when it was filled up to of its height. Since the tank is rectangular, we can use the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism:

Volume of tank = length x width x height = 100 cm x 80 cm x 30 cm = 240,000 cm³

Since the tank was filled up to of its height, the volume of water in the tank at this point is:

Volume of water in tank = 100 cm x 80 cm x 30 cm x 0.5 = 1,200,000 cm³

To find the amount of water that was poured into the tank to fill it up to 3 of its height, we need to subtract the volume of water that was originally in the tank from the total volume of water when it is 3 filled, which is 384 liters or 384,000 cm³ (since 1 liter = 1000 cm³):

Volume of water poured into tank = Volume of water when 3 filled - Volume of water in tank at of its height

= 384,000 cm³ - 1,200,000 cm³

= -816,000 cm³

Wait a minute, this result is negative, which means there was no water poured into the tank to reach the 3 filled level. In fact, it suggests that there was an excess of water that had to be removed from the tank to reach the desired level. This could be because the dimensions of the tank were not exact or because the tank was not level when filled to the first level.

Therefore, the answer to the problem is 0 liters or 0 cm³.

Note: It is important to always check the result of a calculation to ensure it makes sense in the context of the problem. In this case, the negative volume of water poured into the tank indicates that there may be an error in the problem statement or in the measurements provided.

Answer:

B,C,D

Step-by-step explanation:

They are matching up and in relation, but 1 is not.

Answer:

It is in the tenths place

Step-by-step explanation:

In the number 9.365, 3 is in the tenths place.

Answer:

a) To find the probability that a randomly chosen 12-month-old baby girl weighs less than 19.98 pounds, we need to standardize the weight using the z-score formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the weight we want to find the probability for, μ is the mean weight, and σ is the standard deviation.

Substituting the given values, we get:

z = (19.98 - 21) / 2.18

z = -0.46

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the probability of a z-score less than -0.46 is approximately 0.3222.

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen 12-month-old baby girl weighs less than 19.98 pounds is about 0.3222 or 32.22%.

b) To find the probability that a randomly chosen 12-month-old baby girl weighs more than 22.84 pounds, we again need to standardize the weight using the z-score formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Substituting the given values, we get:

z = (22.84 - 21) / 2.18

z = 0.84

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the probability of a z-score greater than 0.84 is approximately 0.2005.

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen 12-month-old baby girl weighs more than 22.84 pounds is about 0.2005 or 20.05%.

c) To find the proportion of 12-month-old baby girls who weigh between 19.36 and 22.08 pounds, we need to standardize both weights using the z-score formula:

z1 = (19.36 - 21) / 2.18

z1 = -0.73

z2 = (22.08 - 21) / 2.18

z2 = 0.53

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find the area under the curve between these two z-scores, which is approximately 0.5722.

Therefore, the proportion of 12-month-old baby girls who weigh between 19.36 and 22.08 pounds is about 0.5722 or 57.22%.

On solving the provided question we can say that Thus, the given exponential expression represents exponential decay with a decay factor of 0.25 or a decay constant of 1.386.

The word "exponential growth" refers to the process of increasing quantity through time. When the instantaneous rate of change of a quantity with respect to time is proportional to the quantity, this is said to be proportional to the quantity. Exponential growth is a statistical pattern in which bigger gains are seen with time. Compound interest delivers exponential rewards in the world of finance. Savings accounts with compound interest can occasionally experience exponential growth. characterised by a rapid increase in the exponential growth rate (in size or extent). exponentially.

exponential decay with a decay factor of 0.25.

\(A_0 = A_0 e^{(-kt)}\\A_0 = 300\\\\A = 300(1-0.25)^t\\k = ln(1/0.25) = 1.386\)

Thus, the given expression represents exponential decay with a decay factor of 0.25 or a decay constant of 1.386.

To know more about exponential growth visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12490064

#SPJ1

Answer:

The interest rate and the number of compounding periods best describe the factors that determine the amount of interest because they encompass the ideas of time and yield.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps!!!

Answer:

z > -4/5

Step-by-step explanation:

-9 - (2z - 7) > -2z - 6 - 5z

Get rid of the parenthesis

-9 - 2z + 7 > -2z - 6 - 5z

Combine like terms:

       -2 - 2z > -7z - 6

       +2       >       +2

Add 2 to both sides.

 -2z > -7z - 4

 +7z > +7z

Add 7 to both sides.

5z > -4

Divide both sides by 5 to get z.

z > -4/5

---------------------------------

More on inequalities: https://brainly.com/question/21857626

Hope this helps! :)

The probability distribution for x is:

x P(x)

0 0.214

1 0.571

2 0.214

Since there are 8 cameras in the box, the total number of ways to choose 2 cameras from the box is given by the combination formula:

C(8,2) = 8!/(2!×(8-2)!) = 28

So there are 28 possible ways to choose a sample of 2 cameras.

Now, let's calculate the probability of each possible value of x:

When x = 0, both cameras in the sample are non-defective. The number of ways to choose 2 non-defective cameras from the 4 non-defective cameras in the box is given by the combination formula:

C(4,2) = 4!/(2!×(4-2)!) = 6

So the probability of x = 0 is:

P(x=0) = (number of ways to choose 2 non-defective cameras)/(total number of ways to choose 2 cameras)

= 6/28

= 0.214

When x = 1, one camera in the sample is defective and the other is non-defective. The number of ways to choose 1 defective camera from the 4 defective cameras in the box and 1 non-defective camera from the 4 non-defective cameras in the box is given by the product of the corresponding combinations:

C(4,1) × C(4,1) = 4×4 = 16

So the probability of x = 1 is:

P(x=1) = (number of ways to choose 1 defective camera and 1 non-defective camera)/(total number of ways to choose 2 cameras)

= 16/28

= 0.571

When x = 2, both cameras in the sample are defective. The number of ways to choose 2 defective cameras from the 4 defective cameras in the box is given by the combination formula:

C(4,2) = 4!/(2!×(4-2)!) = 6

So the probability of x = 2 is:

P(x=2) = (number of ways to choose 2 defective cameras)/(total number of ways to choose 2 cameras)

= 6/28

= 0.214

Therefore, the probability distribution for x is:

x P(x)

0 0.214

1 0.571

2 0.214

to know more about probability

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

Answer:

The number is 500.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let n be the number

Convert percent to decimal

20% = 0.20

0.20n = 100

Divide both sides of the equation by 0.20

0.20n/0.20 = 100/0.20

n = 500

Answer:

fortnite

Step-by-step explanation:

winwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwin

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes

She can purchase 3 blue towels and 5 green towels.

The unitary technique involves first determining the value of a single unit, followed by the value of the necessary number of units. what kinds of values and units

Let's say you go to the store to buy six apples.

You are informed by the shopkeeper that he is offering 10 apples for Rs 100. In this instance, the value and the units are the price of the apples. Recognizing the units and values is crucial when using the unitary technique to a problem.

Always write the items that need to be computed on the right side and the things that are known on the left side to simplify things.

We are aware of the quantity of apples and the amount of money in the aforesaid problem.

According to our question-

8 x 5 = 40

10 x 3 = 30

40 + 30 = 70

Hence, She can purchase 3 blue towels and 5 green towels.

learn more about unitary method click here:

https://brainly.com/question/24587372

#SPJ4

Check the picture below.

The value of df, when x = π/4 and dx = 1/24, is (-5π - 5√2)/(96√2).

To find the derivative of the function f(x) = -5cos(x) + xtan(x), we'll use the sum and product rules of differentiation. Let's start by finding df/dx.

Apply the product rule:

Let u(x) = -5cos(x) and v(x) = xtan(x).

Then, the product rule states that (uv)' = u'v + uv'.

Derivative of u(x):

u'(x) = d/dx[-5cos(x)] = -5 * d/dx[cos(x)] = 5sin(x) [Using the chain rule]

Derivative of v(x):

v'(x) = d/dx[xtan(x)] = x * d/dx[tan(x)] + tan(x) * d/dx[x] [Using the product rule]

= x * sec^2(x) + tan(x) [Using the derivative of tan(x) = sec^2(x)]

Applying the product rule:

(uv)' = (5sin(x))(xtan(x)) + (-5cos(x))(x * sec^2(x) + tan(x))

= 5xsin(x)tan(x) - 5xcos(x)sec^2(x) - 5cos(x)tan(x)

Simplify the expression:

df/dx = 5xsin(x)tan(x) - 5xcos(x)sec^2(x) - 5cos(x)tan(x)

Now, we need to evaluate df/dx at x = π/4 and dx = 1/24.

Substitute x = π/4 into the derivative expression:

df/dx = 5(π/4)sin(π/4)tan(π/4) - 5(π/4)cos(π/4)sec^2(π/4) - 5cos(π/4)tan(π/4)

Simplify the trigonometric values:

sin(π/4) = cos(π/4) = 1/√2

tan(π/4) = 1

sec(π/4) = √2

Substituting these values:

df/dx = 5(π/4)(1/√2)(1)(1) - 5(π/4)(1/√2)(√2)^2 - 5(1/√2)(1)

Simplifying further:

df/dx = 5(π/4)(1/√2) - 5(π/4)(1/√2)(2) - 5(1/√2)

= (5π/4√2) - (10π/4√2) - (5/√2)

= (5π - 10π - 5√2)/(4√2)

= (-5π - 5√2)/(4√2)

= (-5π - 5√2)/(4√2)

Now, to evaluate df/dx when dx = 1/24, we'll multiply the derivative by the given value:

df = (-5π - 5√2)/(4√2) * (1/24)

= (-5π - 5√2)/(96√2)

for such more question on derivative

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the total revenue in each market, we can calculate the product of the sale volumes and sale prices per unit using matrices.

Let's represent the sale volumes as a matrix V and the sale prices per unit as a matrix P:

V = [6000 9000 1300]

[12000 6000 17000]

P = [3.50]

[2.75]

[1.50]

To calculate the total revenue in each market, we need to perform matrix multiplication between V and P, considering the appropriate dimensions. The resulting matrix will give us the total revenue for each product in each market.

Total revenue = V * P

Calculating the matrix multiplication:

[6000 9000 1300] [3.50] = [Total revenue for product X in Market I Total revenue for product Y in Market I Total revenue for product Z in Market I]

[12000 6000 17000] [2.75] [Total revenue for product X in Market II Total revenue for product Y in Market II Total revenue for product Z in Market II]

Performing the calculation:

[60003.50 + 90002.75 + 13001.50] = [Total revenue for product X in Market I Total revenue for product Y in Market I Total revenue for product Z in Market I]

[120003.50 + 60002.75 + 170001.50] [Total revenue for product X in Market II Total revenue for product Y in Market II Total revenue for product Z in Market II]

Simplifying the calculation:

[21000 + 24750 + 1950] = [Total revenue for product X in Market I Total revenue for product Y in Market I Total revenue for product Z in Market I]

[42000 + 16500 + 25500] [Total revenue for product X in Market II Total revenue for product Y in Market II Total revenue for product Z in Market II]

[47650] = [Total revenue for product X in Market I Total revenue for product Y in Market I Total revenue for product Z in Market I]

[84000] [Total revenue for product X in Market II Total revenue for product Y in Market II Total revenue for product Z in Market II]

Therefore, the total revenue in Market I is GHS 47,650 and the total revenue in Market II is GHS 84,000.

The height of the hill is approximately 25.73 ft. Where v0 is the initial velocity (108 ft/s), g is the acceleration due to gravity \((-32.2 ft/s^2)\),

To find the height of the hill, we can use the formula for the vertical position of an object under constant acceleration:

h = h0 + v0t + 1/2at^2

where h is the final height, h0 is the initial height, v0 is the initial velocity, t is the time, and a is the acceleration due to gravity (-32.2 ft/s^2).

In this case, we are given that the initial height h0 is 3 ft, the initial velocity v0 is 108 ft/s, and the time t is 9.5 s. We want to find the height of the hill, which we can denote as h_hill. The final height is the height of the plain, which we can denote as h_plain and assume is zero.

At the highest point of its trajectory, the arrow will have zero vertical velocity, since it will have stopped rising and just started to fall. So we can set the velocity to zero and solve for the time it takes for that to occur. Using the formula for velocity under constant acceleration:

v = v0 + at

we can solve for t when v = 0, h0 = 3 ft, v0 = 108 ft/s, and a = -32.2 ft/s^2:

0 = 108 - 32.2t

t = 108/32.2 ≈ 3.35 s

Thus, it takes the arrow approximately 3.35 s to reach the top of its trajectory.

Using the formula for the height of an object at a given time, we can find the height of the hill by subtracting the height of the arrow at the top of its trajectory from the initial height:

h_hill = h0 + v0t + 1/2at^2 - h_top

where h_top is the height of the arrow at the top of its trajectory. We can find h_top using the formula for the height of an object at the maximum height of its trajectory:

h_top = h0 + v0^2/2a

Plugging in the given values, we get:

h_top = 3 + (108^2)/(2*(-32.2)) ≈ 196.78 ft

Plugging this into the first equation, we get:

h_hill = 3 + 108(3.35) + 1/2(-32.2)(3.35)^2 - 196.78

h_hill ≈ 25.73 ft

If the arrow is launched at t0, the equation describing velocity as a function of time would be:

v(t) = v0 - gt

For such more questions on velocity

https://brainly.com/question/25749514

#SPJ8

Answer:

1 .i think it is d

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Choose the correct option

Answer:

C. middle school grades

Step-by-step explanation:

Colleges want to see if students challenged themselves by taking rigorous courses, and they also want to know what kind of grades students were able to maintain. They also like to take into account the scores you get on standardized tests because these tests can give a relatively accurate idea of a student's mastery of certain subjects. The only thing they don't pay attention to are the grades you earned in middle school. Since these grades aren't very recent, they don't serve as an accurate measure of a student's academic ability, which is why colleges prefer to look at the grades a student earns during their time in high school.

Hope this helps :)

It's 5 to 8. Adding red marbles in the problem is just to confuse you

Answer:

None of these

Step-by-step explanation:

For adjacent, they are not next to each other.

For alternate exterior, both are not exterior.

For alternate interior, both are not interior.

For corresponding, they are not along the same line.

That leaves us with the answer none of these.

Hope that helps!