What is the difference between a Primary Election and a Caucus?
Answers
Related Questions
What were the effects of the flood on the region? Check
all that apply.
O A"levees-only" policy was established in the state.
Spillways were set aside in southern parts of
Louisiana.
Huge gates were constructed to divert future floods.
New construction began in the Atchafalaya River
basin.
O Communities in certain areas had to be abandoned.
Answers
Answer:
ik it's kinda late but the correct answers are b,c, and e
Explanation:
Just answered this on edge 2020 hope it helps someone!☺️
Answer:
B. Spillways were set aside in southern parts of Louisiana.
C. Huge gates were constructed to divert future floods.
E. Communities in certain areas had to be abandoned.
Explanation:
doing the assignment on edge.... now
How did smallpox affect European
expansion into the Americas?
Answers
Answer: Because the Native Americans dies. 70% percent of people died.
Explanation:
Answer:
Smallpox decimated the Arawaks of the West Indies, before making its way to Mexico with the Spaniards, and preceding them into the Inca Empire. The Spanish estimated that death rates among Native Americans from smallpox reached 25 to 50%
Explanation:
can you PLSSS help answer my question PLSSS
my question: what is the value and importance of EcoPeace Middle East?
what was the name of the valley that the french and indian war was fought over?
Answers
Hope this helps
This is a term given to individuals of the Middle Ages. It describes a person or group of people who are not affiliated with one of the most popular religions. *a. Pagan b. Christians c. Monotheistic d. Polytheistic
Answers
The Whigs became a political party in 1828. They opposed which of these things Jacksonian Democrats believed in?
Aid for small farmers and westerners
Abolishing the Bank of the United States?
Refusal to uphold Supreme Court rulings and continued Presidential vetoes of Congress
All of the above
Answers
The Whigs became a political party in 1828. They opposed which of these things Jacksonian Democrats believed in?The Whigs became a political party in 1828. They opposed the refusal to uphold Supreme Court rulings and continued Presidential vetoes of Congress that Jacksonian Democrats believed in.
The Whig Party was a political party in the United States during the first half of the 19th century. Four U.S. presidents belonged to the party, but the party disbanded after its final presidential candidate lost the 1856 presidential election. The Whig Party emerged in the United States in the 1830s as a response to President Andrew Jackson's "Democratic" Party, which was led by Jacksonian Democrats. The Whigs were united by their opposition to Jacksonian Democracy, as they saw it as a threat to their economic and social interests and to the country's overall stability. Thus, the Whigs opposed the refusal to uphold Supreme Court rulings and continued Presidential vetoes of Congress that Jacksonian Democrats believed in.In addition, the Whigs opposed Andrew Jackson's concentration of power in the hands of the executive branch, particularly the practice of executive veto power, which Jackson employed frequently. Furthermore, the Whigs supported a strong federal government, tariffs to protect American businesses, a national banking system to manage the economy, and federal funding for internal infrastructure development. In short, the Whigs represented a loose coalition of political and economic interests that united against the perceived threat of Jacksonian Democracy. Presidential vetoes of Congress, Refusal to uphold Supreme Court rulings, and Aid for small farmers and westerners are all Jacksonian Democrats' beliefs that the Whigs opposed. Therefore, the correct option is C. Refusal to uphold Supreme Court rulings and continued Presidential vetoes of Congress.
For more information on political party visit:
brainly.com/question/29550422
#SPJ11
What role did compromise play at the constitutional convention?
Answers
Answer:
Compromise played a crucial role at the Constitutional Convention, which was held in Philadelphia in 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation and create a new Constitution for the United States. Throughout the convention, there were several key issues on which the delegates disagreed, such as representation in Congress, the power of the national government, and the institution of slavery. In order to reach a consensus and create a Constitution that could be ratified by the states, the delegates had to engage in a series of compromises. Some notable examples of compromise at the convention include:
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, which resolved the issue of representation in Congress by creating a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation for each state in the Senate.
The Three-Fifths Compromise, which determined that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining representation and taxation.
The Commerce Compromise, which gave Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states, but not to tax exports or to give preferences to any particular state or port.
Compromise was essential to the success of the Constitutional Convention and the creation of the United States Constitution. Without the willingness of the delegates to compromise on key issues, it is unlikely that the Constitution would have been ratified and the country would have developed as it did.
During the 1800s, the movement of large numbers of immigrants from many different countries into large American cities resulted in the rapid growth of
Answers
Large-scale immigration from numerous nations into major American cities throughout the 1800s led to the quick development of urbanization.
People move from rural areas to cities through the process of urbanisation, which was a prominent development in the United States during the 19th century.
Immigrants typically settled in major urban areas like New York, Boston, and Chicago when they came to the United States in search of greater economic and social possibilities.
The introduction of new technology like the steam engine and the railway, which facilitated the movement of both goods and people, was one of many reasons that contributed to the rise of these cities.
New occupations were also produced in metropolitan areas as a result of the expansion of manufacturing and industry, drawing immigrants from rural and international locations.
For such more question on immigration:
https://brainly.com/question/9776180
#SPJ11
The UN was created at the apex of US power. The Security Council is made up of the winners in World War II. In the coming decades, new great powers are predicted to rise. India, Brazil, and Indonesia will grow in power. Japan has been the second largest economy in the world and yet does not have a permanent seat on the Security Council. Do you think the Council should be reformed? If so, how?
On balance, do you think the UN has been a force for order and stability in the world? Why or why not? What changes should it undertake?
How might the rise of China and the relative decline of the United States affect the UN? Do these states agree on the norms promoted by the UN?
Answers
The question of reforming the UN Security Council is a subject of ongoing debate. The Council's current composition, which reflects the power dynamics of the post-World War II era, may not fully represent the emerging global powers.
Reforms could involve expanding permanent seats to include influential countries like India, Brazil, and Japan, ensuring a more representative and inclusive Council.
Additionally, addressing the veto power held by the permanent members could be considered to enhance decision-making. Assessing the UN's impact on global order and stability is nuanced.
While the UN has played a vital role in peacekeeping and humanitarian efforts, its effectiveness can be hindered by power politics and conflicting national interests. It should undertake changes to improve efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness in addressing global challenges.
The rise of China and the relative decline of the United States will certainly affect the UN. China's growing influence may lead to shifts in power dynamics and differing perspectives on global norms and policies.
It is important for the UN to engage both China and the United States in shaping global norms and ensuring cooperation to effectively address global challenges. The extent to which these states agree on the norms promoted by the UN will depend on their respective interests and priorities.
To know more about UN Security Council:
https://brainly.com/question/97111
#SPJ11
Who was napoleon? I need to know his story
Answers
Answer:
Napoleon Bonaparte was a military and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and went on to become Emperor of France. He was born on August 15, 1769, on the island of Corsica, which was under French rule at the time.
Napoleon was educated in France and quickly rose through the ranks of the French army during the Revolutionary Wars. He was a brilliant military strategist and won many victories for France, including the Battle of Austerlitz and the Battle of Borodino.
In 1799, Napoleon staged a coup and established himself as First Consul of France, effectively making himself the leader of the country. In 1804, he declared himself Emperor of France and began a series of ambitious military campaigns to expand the French Empire.
Napoleon's conquests included much of Europe, but he was eventually defeated in 1815 at the Battle of Waterloo. He was exiled to the island of Saint Helena, where he died in 1821.
Napoleon is remembered for his military campaigns, his reforms of French law and education, and his impact on European politics and culture. His legacy continues to be debated and studied by historians and scholars around the world.
Explanation:
Leading up to the french and indian war the british were
Answers
Answer:
gay
Explanation:
Question 10 of 10
How did Dwight Eisenhower contribute to the Allied victory in World War II?
Answers
Answer:
Eisenhower was made Supreme Allied Commander by FDR, and as a result commanded Operation Overlord, or D-Day, the major deciding allied victory of the war
History is written by the victors (winners). The United States andnt ourselves a her allies won WW2. As the winners of the war, we like to preses having been noble and moral during the war (the good guys). In your opinion, after having watched both videos, can you say that we behaved noble and morally during the war? Explain your answer.
Answers
Answer:
The answer is No, the United States was not really noble or moral.
Explanation:
Usually the winners of a war often write anecdotes and reviews of their great deeds, but they are not honest when writing or recounting the failures they had or the bad things they did, a war really does not bring anything good, only disaster, poverty and death and these deaths are mainly of the most innocent people, of civilians, of the poorest and most disadvantaged people, in the case of Japan it was clearly seen how the two nuclear bombs dropped by the United States on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki achieved this , the death of thousands of people including children and innocent women who had nothing to do with this declaration of war.
What was a major worry for the group known as the Anti-Federalists? That a federal government would take away states' rights That the new nation would be unable to confront foreign threats That all Americans would not be able to exercise their rights equally
Answers
A major worry for the Anti-Federalists was that a federal government would take away states' rights. So, option a is correct.
The Anti-Federalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution in the late 1780s. They believed that the proposed Constitution gave too much power to the central government at the expense of the states' sovereignty.
The Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government would lead to a consolidation of power and erode the autonomy of the individual states. They argued that the Constitution did not include sufficient safeguards to protect states' rights and that the federal government would gradually encroach upon the authority of the states. They saw the Constitution as a threat to the principles of federalism, which emphasized a division of power between the national government and the states.
The Anti-Federalists were concerned that a powerful central government would undermine the rights and liberties of the people. They believed that a distant and centralized authority would be less responsive to the needs and concerns of individual citizens. They worried that without strong protections for individual rights, the federal government could become tyrannical and infringe upon the freedoms of the people.
While the Anti-Federalists recognized the importance of a united front in confronting foreign threats, their primary concern was the preservation of states' rights and individual liberties. They argued for the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution to explicitly protect the rights of individuals and limit the power of the federal government.
In response to the Anti-Federalists' concerns, the Federalists, who supported the Constitution, promised to add a Bill of Rights once the Constitution was ratified. This compromise helped to alleviate some of the Anti-Federalists' worries and ultimately led to the ratification of the Constitution. So, option a is correct.
To learn more about Anti-Federalists, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32211450
#SPJ11
Complete question:
What was a major worry for the group known as the Anti-Federalists?
That a federal government would take away states' rights
That the new nation would be unable to confront foreign threats
That all Americans would not be able to exercise their rights equally
Why did many people turn to tenant farming/sharecropping as a way to make a living after the Civil War?
Answers
Answer:
slaves, and white farmers got yeeted off their farm by the bad economy so they could take they food
Explanation:
from the way that solar eclipses happen, the ancient greeks concluded that
Answers
The ancient Greeks, through observing solar eclipses, concluded that the Earth is round and that it revolves around the Sun.
By witnessing the Earth's shadow cast onto the Moon during a solar eclipse, they deduced that the Earth must be a spherical shape. Additionally the differentt angles of the Sun's rays during solar eclipses in various locations led them to determine that the Earth was not flat.
Furthermore, Greek astronomers, such as Aristarchus of Samos, studied the relative positions of the Earth, Sun, and Moon during eclipses and used this information to calculate their distances and sizes.
This eventually led to the development of the heliocentric model, which posits that the Earth and other planets orbit the Sun. In conclusion, solar eclipses played a crucial role in shaping the ancient Greeks' understanding of the Earth's shape and its position in the solar system.
You can read more about heliocentric model at https://brainly.in/question/15863224#:
#SPJ11
the bail reform act of 1984 established the practice of:
Answers
The Bail Reform Act of 1984, moreover known as the Federal Bail Reform Act, built up the hone of preventive detainment within the united States.
Beneath this act, certain people accused of federal crimes may well be held in detainment without a safeguard in case they were regarded to posture a peril to the community or a flight chance.
The Bail Reform Act of 1984 presented a critical move within the approach to pretrial discharge. Earlier to this act, the essential thought for safeguard was the defendant's capacity to pay, which was regularly brought about within the discharge of people exclusively based on their budgetary assets. In any case, the 1984 Act moved the centre to the chance postured by the defendant's discharge.
According to the act, a court may arrange pretrial detainment in case it finds that no condition or combination of conditions will sensibly guarantee the appearance of the litigant in court or the security of the community. This arrangement permits judges to consider components such as the earnestness of the offence, the defendant's criminal history, the potential threat to others, and the probability of flight when making detainment choices.
By setting up the practice of preventive detainment, the Safeguard Change Act of 1984 pointed to address concerns related to open security and the flight chance of respondents anticipating trial. It gives a lawful system for judges to create informed choices around pretrial release based on chance appraisal instead of exclusively on budgetary contemplations.
know more about Bail Reform
https://brainly.com/question/32323387
#SPJ4
explain why women should be allowed to vote using the first amendment .
I brainlist on whoever has the best answer
Answers
Answer:
Women should be allowed to vote using the first amendment because laws affect women just as much as men.
I don't really have much to say, lol.
I need a response to these discussions
Read the article, "This Map Shows the Scale of the 16th- and 17th-Century Scottish Witch Trials" located in the module resources. When reviewing this article, you may consult the map or the text. As you examine the article, find stories, details, and words that stand out as topics of diversity.
How does your peers' understanding of the article inform your understanding of seeing the same historical moment from more than one perspective?
While reading this article, the diversity-related word that stood out to me was ‘woman.’ When looking at an account of a historical event, it is important to consider what perspective of the event we are hearing. Historically, women’s voices have been marginalized and I’m sure that if a woman’s perspective of these events was recorded, we would have had a much different history. Diversity is what makes people unique and instead of celebrating these unique women, they were called witches and murdered. Sadly, these women were not witches, they were mothers, sisters, friends, and wives. Because these women did not fit the societal standard of what a woman should be at the time, they were persecuted and tortured to death. In the case of Isobel Young, whose husband claimed "that his wife had attempted "to kill him with magic after quarreling about an unsavory house guest." it sounds like she just didn’t take her husband’s things lying down.
What this story, and many other stories in history, tell us about the relationship between culture, identity, power, and history is that whoever has the power and falls within the confines of the acceptable identity within a society will write history. Those in power are in control of the historical narrative and are the voices that we have heard for generations. If more diverse perspectives were recorded during this event, then countless lives could have been saved in other "witch trials" elsewhere. Exploring all voices and perspectives, especially marginalized ones, is the only way that we can gain the whole picture of a past event and the only way to preserve the truth for the future.
-Avery
After spending some time with the article, the term that stood out to me the most was the author Steve Katz's observation that the European witch hunts represented a "fear" of women by dominantly white, male Christian society. They rationalized this fear with how women might coerce or control men, and in that context was perceived as "sorcery." I felt this stood out as a topic of diversity because it represents a core inequality between men and women in society, where men used their power and influence to unfairly persecute and execute those who challenged their position of authority. Reading some of the anecdotes, it sounds like the only "crime" that occurred was that a woman demonstrated "patterns of verbal and physical aggression," as noted with the example of Isabel Young. The fact that her husband was a primary accuser helps to reinforce the notion that gender inequality and social norms played factors in the witch hunts of Scotland.
This resource also told us much about Christian European culture in the 17th century and how seriously people took accusations of witchcraft as an affront to their religious values or people's identity as a "servant of god" or some equivalent. We can still observe these disparities in gender identity today, where marginalized groups continue to be stereotyped. Any attempt to think or act differently might not simply be rejected but considered a threat to their society.
In the context of history, this map shows an evident and systematic pattern of persecution for women throughout Scotland. It highlights a crucial facet of history that the other resources from this week tried to impart. We can teach history in several ways, but its context is essential. Before reading this article, it made me think about the Salem Witch Trials in Massachusetts. However, I didn't consider much about those events' underlying cultural, identity, and power factors. Now that I have learned more about these trials in other parts of the world, I can't help but wonder more about how diversity played a role in these historical events.
-Charles
Answers
From reading this article and both of my peers' responses, it is clear to see that the 16th and 17th century witch trials in Scotland were rooted in fear and systemic oppression of women and other marginalized groups.
Through the anecdotes presented, we can see the way in which women were framed as the ‘witch’ or the one in control due to their verbal and physical aggression. This paints a picture of how, at the time, certain gender roles were expected to be respected and any deviation from that was viewed as a threat to religious values and social norms.
Both my peers highlight the importance of understanding the way power played a role in these events and how crucial it is to look at a historical moment from all perspectives to gain a whole picture of the truth. This was insightful in getting me to think about the Salem Witch Trials and it further emphasizes the importance of recognizing all voices in history, especially marginalized ones.
To know more about witch trials, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7622433
#SPJ4
How were farmers given an opportunity to own a farm in Bosque Farms after the Dust Bowl?
And please don't answer with a link thank you.
Answers
Answer:
The Bosque Farm Project helped farmers in New Mexico by giving farmers an opportunity to own a farm in Bosque Farms after the Dust Bowl by winning a public lottery that was held in 1935.
Help:
Could you please help me with the two post recent questions of mine on my page? I will give u brainliest and 20 points! :))) X
Since Rome was surrounded by friendly nations, it did not increase its military
expenditures during its early history
O True
O False
Answers
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Military expenditure drove economic development, bringing enslaved people and loot back to Rome, which it turn transformed the city of Rome and Roman culture
Item 12:
Why was the Zimmerman Telegram significant?
A It revealed Germany's plot to recruit Mexico as an ally against the U.S.
B It revealed Germany's plan to invade Great Britain.
It confirmed that the sinking of the Lusitania was not an accident.
It revealed Germany's plot to build a naval blockade around the United States.
Submit Answer
Answers
The Zimmerman Telegram is significant as it revealed Germany's plot to recruit Mexico as an ally against U.S.
What was the Zimmerman Telegram?The Zimmerman Telegram was a secret message sent by the German government to the Mexican government during World War I in 1917. The message proposed a military alliance between Germany and Mexico, in which Germany would support Mexico in regaining lost territories from the United States in exchange for Mexico joining the war on Germany's side. The message was intercepted and deciphered by British intelligence and shared with the United States, which was a neutral party at the time. The revelation of the telegram's contents contributed to the United States' decision to enter World War I against Germany. The Zimmerman Telegram is considered to be a significant factor in the outcome of the war.
To learn more about Zimmerman Telegram, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14939545
#SPJ1
Could somebody pass me 10 facts about sámi?
Answers
2. No-one is exactly sure how many Sámi people there are, but estimates range from between 50,000 – 200,000
3. Their traditional outfits – known as the Gakti – are worn at parties, festivals, weddings, baptisms, funerals and more.
4. The Sámi are best known for reindeer herding
5. There are nine different Sámi languages!
6. Traditionally, the Sámi people lived in a group of families called a ‘siida‘. The word siida is used to describe both the reindeer herding area and the team of people who look after the herd.
7. Unmarried sámi uses round buttons on their belts. When married they switch to buttons that are square
8. Marks will be put in the reindeers ear to identify their owner.
9. Reindeer season starts from May where all the reindeer are counted up as reindeer farms can only have a certain quota to make sure the natural surroundings can sustain them
Which of the following is the best example of a historical narrative? A.The major battles of World War I, and the number of casualties in each. B.The archeological evidence of how the Spiro Mounds were created. C.The space race between the United States and the Soviet Union  D. The number of subjects under Napoleon Bonaparte's rule in Europe
Answers
The best example of a historical narrative is "The space race between the United States and the Soviet Union." Option C
What is narrative history?
Generally, Writing history in the style of a tale is an example of the technique known as narrative history.
It often involves writing history based on recreating a set of events that occurred within a very short period of time,
In conclusion, The "space race" between the United States of America and the Soviet Union is the most successful example of a historical narrative. Alternative C
Read more about narrative history
https://brainly.com/question/28670220
#SPJ1
PLEASE SOMEONE HELP QUICK. Which sentence in the passage states the main idea of the paragraph
Answers
Answer:
i think the sentences 3 will right .....
Jeff can paint a certain room in 6 hours, but Shawn needs 4 hours to paint the same room. How long does it take them to paint the room if they work together? Construct a rational equation to solve the problem above. Show your work and explain your answer.
Answers
The rational equation 1/6 + 1/4 = 1/x is constructed based on their individual work rates. Solving for x gives us the time it takes for them to paint the room together, which is 2.4 hours.
To determine how long it takes Jeff and Shawn to paint the room when working together, we need to construct a rational equation based on their individual rates of work.
Let's denote the time it takes them to paint the room together as "x" hours.
To solve this problem, we can consider the rates at which Jeff and Shawn work. The rate at which a person works is the reciprocal of the time it takes them to complete a task.
Jeff's work rate is 1 room per 6 hours, which can be expressed as 1/6 room per hour.
Similarly, Shawn's work rate is 1 room per 4 hours or 1/4 room per hour.
When they work together, their work rates add up. Thus, the equation can be constructed as follows:
Jeff's work rate + Shawn's work rate = Work rate when they work together
1/6 + 1/4 = 1/x
To solve this equation, we need to find a common denominator, which in this case is 12:
2/12 + 3/12 = 1/x
5/12 = 1/x
Cross-multiplying, we get:
5x = 12
Dividing both sides by 5:
x = 12/5
Therefore, it takes them 12/5 hours or 2.4 hours (2 hours and 24 minutes) to paint the room when they work together.
In summary, the rational equation 1/6 + 1/4 = 1/x is constructed based on their individual work rates. Solving for x gives us the time it takes for them to paint the room together, which is 2.4 hours.
Know more about Rational equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/30284909
#SPJ8
Under Enlightenment philosophy, it was acceptable to revolt against a government if that government breaks the social contract of protecting its citizens.
True or False
Answers
Indeed, it is TRUE that under Enlightenment philosophy, it was acceptable to revolt against a government if that government breaks the social contract of protecting its citizens.
What was Englightenment philosophy?Enlightenment philosophy, which gained acceptance during the Middle Age, emphasized:
The value of human happinessThe pursuit of knowledge through reasoningLiberty and progressConstitutional governmentsThe separation of Church and state.What is the social contract?The social contract theory refers to an implicit understanding that both the ruler and the ruled have some rights and duties to each other.
With the social contract, the government must be accountable to the citizens. If a government fails to comply with the social contract of accountability and responsibility, citizens can overthrow it.
Thus, it is TRUE that under Enlightenment philosophy, it was acceptable to revolt against a government if that government breaks the social contract of protecting its citizens.
Learn more about Enlightenment and Social Contract at https://brainly.com/question/9531645 and https://brainly.com/question/1462261
#SPJ1
How did the Supreme Court rule Scott v. Sandford case
Answers
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that Africans Americans, enslaved or free, were not citizens of the United States and had no right to sue in federal courts.
Explanation:
Hope I helped.
what was the goal of the crusades? responses to take back the holy land from the muslims to take back the holy land from the muslims to convert muslims in the middle east to christianity to convert muslims in the middle east to christianity to drive the sejuk turks from constantinople to drive the sejuk turks from constantinople to retaliate against jews who had captured jerusalem
Answers
The goal of the Crusades was to retake the Holy Land from the Muslims and convert them to Christianity, as well as to drive the Seljuk Turks from Constantinople and retaliate against Jews.
The goal of the Crusades was to retake the Holy Land from the Muslims. This was to be done by taking control of Jerusalem, which was seen by Christians as the holiest city in the world. Additionally, the Crusades were also intended to convert Muslims in the Middle East to Christianity and to drive the Seljuk Turks from Constantinople. Finally, the Crusades were also seen as a way to retaliate against Jews who had taken control of Jerusalem in the 11th century.Learn more about goal of the Crusades at: https://brainly.com/question/7162499
#SPJ4
One of the advantages held by the Union during the Civil War was
a. they had industries and manufacturing to supply their army
b. they had a small population that was easier to manage in wartime
c. They had gifted military leaders such as Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson
d. they only had a few railroads
Answers
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
The states that stayed in the Union comprised a larger population and a larger industrial capacity than the secessionist states.
In 25 words or fewer, why do you think Bacon's contribution mattered?