what is the cause of the majority of data breaches

a. sending a handwritten thank-you note would be an appropriate follow-up gesture.

A gesture is a form nonverbal communication ornon-vocal communication in which visible fleshly conduct communicate particular dispatches, either in place of, or in confluence with, speech. Gestures include movement of the hands, face, or another corridor of the body. When you relate, you make broad and agitated movements with your hands when speaking. Someone describing a scary auto accident might relate hectically. The verb gesticulate is related to the noun gesture.

The gesture has stress on the first syllable, and relate has stress on the alternate syllable.

Learn more about gesture here: https://brainly.com/question/27031953

#SPJ4

The Declaration of Independence, signed on July 4, 1776, was a pivotal document in American history that aimed to sever the political ties between the American colonies and Great Britain. Its primary purpose was to declare the colonies' intention to form an independent nation, free from British rule. While the declaration marked the beginning of a revolution, it also laid the groundwork for the fundamental rights and principles that would shape the newly emerging United States of America.

The Declaration of Independence outlined the grievances of the colonists against the British government, asserting that all individuals are endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It stated that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed and that when a government fails to protect the rights of its citizens, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.

By declaring independence, the Founding Fathers aimed to establish a government based on the principles of self-governance, equality, and individual rights. The declaration was a bold assertion of the colonists' determination to create a society where citizens had the freedom to govern themselves and pursue their own happiness. It laid the foundation for the formation of a democratic republic and inspired future movements for liberty and equality around the world.

While the immediate impact of the Declaration of Independence was the severance of ties with Britain and the initiation of the American Revolutionary War, its long-term significance was in shaping the principles that would guide the American nation. It influenced the drafting of the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which enshrined the rights and liberties of American citizens, including freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial.

Overall, the Declaration of Independence was a revolutionary document that set forth the principles of self-determination, individual rights, and government by consent that formed the basis for the United States of America and continues to resonate as a symbol of freedom and independence.

for more questions on Great Britain

https://brainly.com/question/30054989

#SPJ11

The United States Supreme Court case that upheld the principle of implied powers is McCulloch v. Maryland.

McCulloch v. Maryland, decided in 1819, involved a dispute over the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States and the state of Maryland's attempt to tax the bank. Chief Justice John Marshall, writing the majority opinion, addressed the issue of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8).

The Supreme Court held that the creation of the Second Bank of the United States was within the scope of Congress's implied powers. Marshall's opinion established the doctrine of implied powers, stating that Congress possesses powers not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution as long as they are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers.

This landmark decision affirmed the supremacy of federal law over state law and solidified the doctrine of implied powers, providing a broad interpretation of federal authority. McCulloch v. Maryland remains an influential case in constitutional law and has shaped the understanding of implied powers in the United States.

To learn more about McCulloch v. Maryland, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/546157

#SPJ11

Answer:

C. to keep the house from catching on fire

Explanation:

Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.

When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.

An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.

In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.

So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire

Answer:

Much of this depends on his immigration status when he committed the crime. If we assume he had illegal status and If he was ordered to leave, he would not be allowed reentry for 5-20 years, if ever. Even if he had a green card, he would be barred from reentry. He was most likely barred from reentry because of a felony.  A felony charge will ensure no reentry. The officer was correct.

These are for trafficking, each state will have other laws.

The U.S. Code, Title 22, Chapter 78 – Trafficking Victims Protection

The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act (TVPA)

The Customs and Facilitations and Trade Enforcement Reauthorization Act of 2009

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004

The PROTECT Act of 2003

The Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)

The Mann Act of 1910

You can file a class-action suit that deals with equal pay or gender discrimination against your employer. Thus, the statement is FALSE.

You may bring a class-action lawsuit against an employer if they have injured you by offering you unfair compensation or if you experienced workplace discrimination due to your gender identity and/or gender expression.

The following aspects—sex, race, color, religion, and national origin—are protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

During a legal proceeding known as a class action, one or more petitioners file a lawsuit on behalf or for the benefit of a broader group of individuals or of class members. 

Learn about the class action lawsuit Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority that deals with public housing: https://brainly.com/question/28179741

#SPJ4

Answer:

Hope this helps (O) _ (O)

Explanation:

Economics This lesson identifies the key princi- ples that guide economic analysis. It introduces students to the basic economic problems of scarce resources, unlimited wants, the need to choose among alternatives, the consequences of cost, and the importance of incen- tives. While noting that nothing of value is free, the les- son explains how voluntary trade helps to provide more goods and services. While today is important, people are forward-looking in the decisions they make.

Reasoning Economic reasoning proceeds from basic assumptions about human activity. This lesson introduces students to these basic assumptions and uses them to model economic reasoning about an issue. It shows students how to apply the assumptions in the case of what seems to be a mystery: Why would people who admire a trim, slender appearance in others choose to eat too much and be inactive?

In order for Mohammed to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination under Title VII, he must demonstrate several elements to the court. Firstly, he must show that he belongs to a protected class. This means that he must show that he was discriminated against based on his race, color, national origin, religion, or sex.

In Mohammed's case, he is an immigrant from Afghanistan, which means that he belongs to a protected class based on his national origin. This means that he can allege racial discrimination by his co-workers and employers.Secondly, Mohammed must show that he suffered an adverse employment action. This means that he must show that he was subjected to some form of discrimination that adversely affected his employment. In Mohammed's case, he suffered verbal abuse, humiliation, and physical assault by his co-workers. These actions caused him harm and negatively impacted his ability to perform his job.Thirdly, Mohammed must show that the adverse employment action was based on his membership in a protected class. In other words, he must show that he was discriminated against because of his national origin.Finally, Mohammed must show that the discrimination occurred in the context of his employment. This means that he must show that the discrimination occurred at his place of work or was related to his employment.

To know more about discriminated visit:

brainly.com/question/29801080

#SPJ11

Explanation:

The law enforcement coordinating committee

hope it helps please mark as brainliest

Police officers who have a working knowledge of forensic science make fewer mistakes and collect evidence at crime scenes that is more scientifically useful. TRUE

Forensic technology technicians aid crook investigations via gathering and studying evidence. Many technicians specialise in both crime scene research or laboratory evaluation.

A forensic science degree takes either  or four years to complete and prepares graduates for diverse careers. precise effects depend upon the selected awareness. capability concentrations include forensic anthropology, digital forensics, and forensic toxicology.

Forensic technological know-how is the determine direction that has numerous sub-fields. even as Forensic science consists of Toxicology, Serology, Ballistics to Psychology, Forensic medication is a branch that deals in civil or crook criminal cases (investigation). Forensic medication is likewise known as Forensic Pathology.

Learn more about  forensic science here

https://brainly.com/question/29110538

#SPJ4

The CPD can reduce the 15% polling requirement and allow third party candidates to debate with the top two parties to avoid lawsuits and confrontations.

What does Lawsuit means?

A lawsuit is a civil action brought in a court of law by a plaintiff against a defendant, alleging that the defendant has committed a legal wrong. It is a dispute between two or more parties that seeks legal relief in the form of a judgment for damages, an injunction, or other court order.

What does Injunction mean?

An injunction forbids someone from doing something. It is an example of an equitable remedy. Injunctions are commonly used to prevent one party from doing something that could cause irreparable harm to another. For example, a court may issue an injunction to prevent a person from disposing of assets or engaging in activities that could jeopardize the legal rights of another party.

To know more about  Injunction,

https://brainly.com/question/28452554

#SPJ1

Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports.

The rule states that an expert witness must provide a written report detailing the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify. The report must include a complete statement of all the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify, the reasons for the opinions, any exhibits to be used as evidence, and the qualifications of the witness.

The report must be provided at least 90 days before the trial date, and the expert must be available for deposition prior to trial. The expert's report must be signed, dated, and served on all parties in the case.

To know more about Federal , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14858877

#SPJ4

Answer:

as soon as possible

without delay; promptly.

In the given case, when an individual wants a jury trial, they summon four individuals to decide the destiny, these four are not a legitimate jury, as the jury should consist of six to twelve persons.

The defense of debtor-defendants, defeating foolish legislation, upholding the rights of private persons in legal disputes with the government, and safeguarding litigants from overbearing and repressive judges were some of the justifications put out for civil jury trials.

Almost all juries are able to come to a unanimous decision. In some sorts of situations, it is a verdict that receives the support of 11 out of 12 jurors is admissible. A hung jury is one that cannot reach a consensus after the jury has deliberated or considered for numerous hours or days.

To learn more about the legitimate jury, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/9788151

#SPJ2

Antitrust laws state that a company cannot use aggressive tactics to force consumers to make payments.

A company, also known as co., is a legal designation for a group of people with a particular goal who are either naturally occurring, legally created, or a combination of both. Members of the company collaborate to accomplish clearly stated objectives. Although there has been much discussion regarding the exact definition of law, it is generally agreed upon that it is a system of rules developed and enforced by social or governmental institutions to control behavior. Both the science and the art of justice have been used to describe it. There are seven different categories of law: the constitution, which is the supreme body of law; statutes; common or case law; civil; criminal; equity; and administrative.

Learn more about law here :
https://brainly.com/question/12469633

#SPJ4

Slick or wet, reduced surface circumstances make it difficult to control your vehicle's speed and direction.

In criminal law, special circumstances are the conduct of the accused or the conditions in which a crime, notably homicide, was committed. Such considerations necessitate or permit a harsher punishment. Special circumstances are elements of the crime and must thus be established beyond a possible suspicion during the guilt phase of the trial. As such, they are officially distinct from aggravating circumstances, which are established during the punishment phase of the trial instead. In Californian, if a defendant has been convicted of the first murder and one of the 22 mentioned special circumstances is found to be true, the only available sentences are life in prison with no chance of parole or death.

Learn more about speed here

https://brainly.com/question/17768073

#SPJ4

If you were a small state at the Constitutional Convention, you would most likely support the New Jersey Plan as the basis for representation in the legislature.What is the New Jersey Plan?The New Jersey Plan, also known as the Paterson Plan, was a proposal presented to the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

It was intended to maintain equal representation in Congress for all states, regardless of size or population.The New Jersey Plan, proposed by William Paterson of New Jersey, was in contrast to the Virginia Plan, which proposed that the states' representation be proportional to their population. The Virginia Plan proposed that the national legislature be divided into two houses based on population, with the lower house being elected directly by the people and the upper house being elected by the lower house.Paterson's New Jersey Plan called for a unicameral legislature, with each state having equal representation. Each state would be entitled to one vote in the legislature, regardless of size or population. It proposed that the national government would also be strengthened, including the power to tax and regulate commerce between the states.The Connecticut Plan, also known as the Great Compromise, eventually won out at the Convention. This proposed a bicameral legislature, with the lower house being proportional to the population of each state and the upper house having equal representation for each state.

To know more about legislature
visit https://brainly.com/question/33523213
#SPJ11

Answer:

History is important, even if it seems useless- It's good to know about what happened in our past. It teaches us, trains us, and gives us ideas. Sometime in our lives theres going to be a time where we will share something we learned from History.

Explanation:

Answer:

The system is dirty

Explanation:

Your aunt is older so back in the day everything got slipped back better.

Some historical examples of discrete and insular minorities include the Jewish community during the Holocaust, Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps, and Indigenous peoples throughout colonization.

- The Jewish community during the Holocaust: During World War II, Jewish people were targeted by the Nazis and subjected to systematic genocide, forced labor, and mass extermination in concentration camps.

- Japanese Americans during World War II internment camps: Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were unjustly perceived as a threat to national security and forcibly relocated to internment camps, where they faced harsh conditions and loss of personal freedom.

- Indigenous peoples throughout colonization: Indigenous communities around the world have faced marginalization, dispossession of land, cultural suppression, and discrimination due to colonial expansion and policies implemented by colonizing powers.

These examples demonstrate the experiences of discrete and insular minorities who have endured discrimination, persecution, and marginalization based on their ethnicity, religion, or cultural background. It is important to acknowledge these historical injustices to promote understanding, empathy, and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their minority status.

For more such questions on colonization, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/27868020

#SPJ8

An example of primary source is a photograph of a civil rights march. Thus, the correct answer is Option B.

A primary source is a first-person or current account of an event or topic. They are the most direct representation of a time or event because they were created by people or things present at the time or event. These sources have not been interpreted and provide original thought or new information.

Primary sources include theses, dissertations, scholarly journal articles (research-based), government reports, symposia and conference proceedings, original artwork, poems, photographs, speeches, letters, memos, personal narratives, diaries, interviews, and correspondence

Therefore, a photograph of a civil rights march is an example of a primary source.

To learn more about primary source, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29771183

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answer is a.

People help each other.

I hope this is helpful!

The changes to Canadian Law related to cannabis can be classified as a combination of permissiveness, prohibition, and regulation.

Permissiveness is seen in the decision to legalize recreational cannabis use and production across the country. Prohibition is seen in the regulations that limit the age of those allowed to consume cannabis, the amount of cannabis able to be carried in public, and the public places it is forbidden to consume or produce.

Regulation is seen in the federal and provincial frameworks that control the production, distribution, sale, and consumption of cannabis; such as age and quantity limitations, taxation, and packaging protocols. This combination of regulatory structures serves to protect the public health while simultaneously allowing access to a previously unavailable market.

To know more about Canadian Law , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30537159

#SPJ4

A fortress-like prison emphasizing security and control is commonly referred to as a "big house," a term often used in slang to describe a maximum-security facility. Option C is correct.

The term "big house" originated from the literal description of large and imposing prison structures, designed to intimidate and control inmates. These prisons typically feature high walls, multiple layers of security measures, and strict regulations. The emphasis on security and control aims to prevent escapes, maintain order, and ensure the safety of both inmates and staff.

The term has been popularized in literature, movies, and colloquial language, becoming synonymous with high-security prisons. It highlights the scale and severity of the institution, reflecting the formidable nature of such facilities.

Option C holds true.

Learn more about prison: https://brainly.com/question/29629661

#SPJ11

Answer: to test the drug content in the blood

Explanation:Option C

Answer:

This suggest that the current system needs to be improved. Ask the person who was put in jail if he had anyone working with him, in exchange the criminal who was put in jail could have 3-5 years off his sentence.

Explanation:

Pls mark Brainliest with the crown

Answer:

Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source. The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic.

Explanation:

I hope it helps you

To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.

Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.

The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.

It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.

To learn about Tax Abuse visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28337521

#SPJ4

Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?