What is the author's purpose in writing this article?
es )
A)
to entertain
B)
to tell a story
C)
to give information
D)
to describe an event
С C

Answer:

c. Humans are basically alone and separated from each other, morally and emotionally.

Explanation:

I took the test and got it right

Answer:

Many universities only accept APA citation format.

Explanation:

Citation or referencing is a process in which any information compiled in the report is added a source from where such information is extracted. It is sometimes very difficult to enter correct references. There are certain rules for citation in Ms word which needs to be followed to enter the correct references.

Answer:

The direct object receives the action of the verb

Explanation:

The subject performs the action of the verb, while the direct object receives the action.

Example: The bully pushed him down. The bully is the subject; they did the pushing. "Him" is the direct object; he got pushed.

The closest connotative meaning to the phrase "in high spirits" in the passage is upbeat. The phrase "in high spirits" refers to a condition of being very happy and full of enthusiasm. The correct answer is option C.

The passengers on the ship were happy and social for the first few days despite having to face the wind that was dead ahead. However, Wyatt and his sisters behaved stiffly and uncourteously to the rest of the party. A connotation refers to the emotions and associations that a word can bring to mind. The word upbeat is associated with a happy and positive mood that fits well with the context of the passage.

The passage is about a group of passengers who were on a ship for the first three or four days. Although the wind was against them, they were in high spirits and disposed to be social. Wyatt and his sisters, however, behaved stiffly and uncourteously to the rest of the party. The passage uses the phrase "in high spirits" to describe the passengers' happy and enthusiastic mood. The closest connotative meaning to this phrase is upbeat, which has a positive and happy connotation.

the phrase "in high spirits" in the passage refers to a condition of being very happy and full of enthusiasm. The closest connotative meaning to this phrase is upbeat, which is associated with a happy and positive mood. The passage is about a group of passengers who were on a ship for the first few days and were happy and social despite facing a headwind. Wyatt and his sisters were the only ones who behaved stiffly and uncourteously to the rest of the party.

For more such questions on connotative, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30338769

#SPJ8

The given statement "A phrase is a group of words making perfect sense" is not true as a phrase does not have a subject-verb combination, which is necessary to make a complete sentence. The correct option is 4.

Out of the given statements, the following is not true: A phrase is a group of words making perfect sense.

What is a phrase? A phrase is a group of words that act as a single part of speech but does not have a subject-verb combination. It functions as a unit within a sentence and can't stand alone. Phrases can serve as adjectives, adverbs, or nouns in a sentence. Examples of phrases are "in the morning", "on the wall", "barking at the moon", etc. They do not have the necessary components of a sentence that include a subject and a predicate.

What is a clause? A clause is a group of words that contain a subject and a predicate. It can either be a complete sentence (independent clause) or a fragment (dependent clause). A dependent clause cannot stand alone and needs an independent clause to complete its meaning. It usually starts with words like when, although, because, while, etc. Examples of clauses are "I like dogs", "When the sun rises", "Although I am tired", etc.

What are subjects and predicates? A subject is the noun or pronoun that performs the action in a sentence. A predicate is the verb that describes what the subject is doing. Examples of subjects and predicates are "The cat sleeps", "They run in the park", "She studies for her exam", etc.

Summary Hence, the given statement "A phrase is a group of words making perfect sense" is not true as a phrase does not have a subject-verb combination, which is necessary to make a complete sentence. The other statements are correct; subject and predicate are two fundamental parts of a sentence, a clause may be a sentence or a part of a sentence, and a phrase does not have a verb.

For more such questions on subject-verb

https://brainly.com/question/26178998

#SPJ8

Based on its etymology, the most likely meaning of the word astrolabe is  early astronomers' tool:

Etymology refers to the original meaning and usage of a word and its subsequent historical developments.

Etymology, as a science, helps to study a word's historical developments and relationships with other words.

Thus, based on its etymology, the most likely meaning of the word astrolabe is early astronomers' tool.

Learn more about etymology at https://brainly.com/question/11871573

Fault lines have been exposed by COVID-19 in both wealthy and developing nations. The pandemic has exposed unfair and inequitable processes that are harming the most disadvantaged and marginalized communities, from failed public healthcare systems to racial inequity. Global poverty levels are growing. According to the World Bank, the pandemic caused an increase in poverty from 88 million to 115 million people in 2020.

The pandemic increased inequality in South Africa. This was evident during the protests and looting of shops that took place in major South African cities, including Johannesburg and Durban, after the jailing of former President Jacob Zuma. More than 200 people died in the riots, and many political observers concluded that Zuma's followers were responsible.

More than 200 people died as a result of the riots, and many political analysts asserted that Zuma's supporters, who believed he was the target of political assassination, were behind the violence. Even President Cyril Ramaphosa said that the unrest was an "insurrection" meant to devastate the nation's infrastructure and economy.

However, there is a growing consensus that apartheid-era scars in South Africa's highly broken society are what really caused the riots. Television footage of the theft showed thieves snatching necessities like food and toiletries, indicating that much of the looting was opportunistic and spontaneous rather than planned. The upheaval exposed a county where a sizable proportion of residents struggled with hunger and poverty.

Learn more about pandemic here:

https://brainly.com/question/18269541

#SPJ9

Answer:

In his article "What are we protecting children from by banning books," Waldman uses several rhetorical devices to connect with his audience. Some examples of these devices are:

1. Anecdotes: Waldman uses anecdotes to illustrate his points and make his argument more relatable to his audience. For example, he tells the story of a librarian who was fired for refusing to remove a book from the shelves. This anecdote helps to personalize the issue of book banning and make it more concrete for his readers.

2. Repetition: Waldman uses repetition to emphasize his points and make them more memorable for his readers. For example, he repeats the phrase "we are protecting children from the wrong things" throughout the article. This repetition helps to drive home his argument that book banning is often misguided and can have negative consequences for children.

3. Appeals to emotion: Waldman uses appeals to emotion to engage his readers and make them more invested in his argument. For example, he describes the experience of reading a banned book as a "revelation" and a "formative experience." This language is designed to evoke strong emotions in his readers and make them more sympathetic to his argument.

Overall, Waldman uses these rhetorical devices to connect with his audience and make his argument more persuasive. By using anecdotes, repetition, and appeals to emotion, he is able to engage his readers and make them more invested in the issue of book banning.

Explanation:

In his article "What are we protecting children from by banning books," Waldman uses several rhetorical devices to connect with his audience. Some examples of these devices are:

1. Anecdotes: Waldman uses anecdotes to illustrate his points and make his argument more relatable to his audience. For example, he tells the story of a librarian who was fired for refusing to remove a book from the shelves. This anecdote helps to personalize the issue of book banning and make it more concrete for his readers.

2. Repetition: Waldman uses repetition to emphasize his points and make them more memorable for his readers. For example, he repeats the phrase "we are protecting children from the wrong things" throughout the article. This repetition helps to drive home his argument that book banning is often misguided and can have negative consequences for children.

3. Appeals to emotion: Waldman uses appeals to emotion to engage his readers and make them more invested in his argument. For example, he describes the experience of reading a banned book as a "revelation" and a "formative experience." This language is designed to evoke strong emotions in his readers and make them more sympathetic to his argument.

Overall, Waldman uses these rhetorical devices to connect with his audience and make his argument more persuasive. By using anecdotes, repetition, and appeals to emotion, he is able to engage his readers and make them more invested in the issue of book banning.

You could've gotten the answer off the internet. But anyways the answer is: Grammar is important because it is the language that makes it possible for us to talk about language. ... "People associate grammar with errors and correctness. But knowing about grammar also helps us understand what makes sentences and paragraphs clear and interesting and precise.

Answer:

The Answer Is B

Explanation:

I took the test and got it right

Answer: A, "Nature produces clean beauty from the rotting bodies of dead humans"

Explanation:

The statement best summarizes that insight as Nature produces clean beauty from the rotting bodies of dead humans. Thus the correct option is A.

A brief introduction of any topic in your own words to make the reader easily understand the plot and setting of any story and help them to engage effectively is called a Summary.

The poem "This Compost" The poem is written in the first person and is solely the narrator's internal dialogue which places a strong emphasis on the natural world, the human body, sexual orientation, and the occurrence of everyday, commonplace things.

How the planet can produce fresh, disease-free life from the diseased trash that is brought into it is the question the narrator asks himself while observing nature. The goal of the entire poem is to respond to the question.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about Summary, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28846379

#SPJ2

The existence of cryptids challenges our understanding of the world and our place in it. 

First and foremost, curiosity in humans has always been piqued by the unexpected and unknown. As naturally curious creatures, it is exciting and unsettling to consider the possibility of unidentified or puzzling animals hiding in plain sight.Second, the existence of cryptids challenges our understanding of the cosmos and our place within it. We want to believe that we have a thorough understanding of the natural world and that the bulk of its species have been discovered. The existence of cryptids challenges this theory and raises the possibility that there are other things out there that we are not aware of.Finally, the idea of cryptids appeals to our primal fears and instincts. Several cryptids are portrayed as being frightful.

To know more about Cryptid,click on the link :

https://brainly.com/question/1822741

#SPJ1

Answer:Your answer is investire

Answer:

There are many different tours that offer a more interesting; and healthy; way of getting around: the Darwin 7- day dash: the Mawson Trail; and the Bondi bike ride are just three of our most popular options."

Explanation:

The above sentence is wrongly punctuated as it employs the colon and semicolon wrongly.

Colons(:) are used for various purposes like separating two independent clauses or to introduce a list or series of items while semicolon is employed to connect two independent clauses which convey complete thoughts together.

In the given sentence, semicolons are wrongly employed after 'interesting', 'healthy', and 'Mawson Trail' as it is separating the elements of the sentence which destroys the meaning of the sentence. The Colon is also used incorrectly after 'the Darwin 7-day dash' as it is introducing the list inappropriately.

In order to rectify these errors, the semicolons would be removed from the prior clause and in the latter clause, the incorrect colon and semicolon would be replaced with a comma(,) to separate the items of the list. After rectifying these errors, the sentence reads as:

There are many different tours that offer a more interesting and healthy way of getting around: the Darwin 7- day dash, the Mawson Trail, and the Bondi bike ride are just three of our most popular options."

In the novel "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri, Gogol is presented as a young man struggling with his identity and trying to find his place in the world.

He is named after the famous Russian writer, Nikolai Gogol, by his parents, who are Bengali immigrants living in the United States. However, he grows up feeling disconnected from his name and his cultural heritage, and he struggles to reconcile his American and Bengali identities.

At the beginning of the novel, Gogol is a confused and conflicted character. He feels embarrassed by his name and doesn't understand why his parents chose it for him. He is also distant from his Bengali roots and prefers to assimilate into American culture. As the novel progresses, Gogol's character begins to change as he confronts his identity crisis and starts to embrace his cultural heritage.

Learn more about Gogol on;

https://brainly.com/question/4217486

#SPJ1

Distinguish the ideas of Machiavelli that you agree with, such as the idea that leaders should always conceal their genuine goals, from those that you disagree with, such as his views on political leadership or the best methods for governing.

Machiavelli's main points: In order to maintain the state, leaders should frequently "act against pity, against faith, against humanity, against frankness, against religion." These are only a few of the principles that Machiavelli advocated. His name has come to represent sly rulers. In order to effectively rule, according to Machiavelli, public and private morality must be understood as two distinct concepts. A monarch must therefore be willing to act dishonestly when necessary and must not merely care about maintaining a good reputation.

Although I don't agree with that viewpoint, I am not an authority on political leadership or what makes for good government. Machiavelli was a shrewd individual, and there is undoubtedly a good case to support their assertions. People frequently use this specific passage to prove that it is a satire. Being feared isn't morally or ethically superior than being liked; in Machiavelli's opinion, it's simply more successful. I personally don't subscribe to that view, but nevertheless, I believe it's fair to say so.

To learn more about Machiavelli's ideas Visit : brainly.com/question/3135172

#SPJ4

Answer:

Mass production means the manufactring of large numbers/quantities of something. often using machines and robots.

eg. the automobile industry mass produces cars.

The Earth's tilt and revolution around the sun cause varying amounts of sunlight to be received by different parts of the Earth throughout the year, leading to the four seasons.

For more questions on seasons

https://brainly.com/question/31647148

#SPJ8

The short story “Three is a Rational Number” by Michele Finn Johnson features a central conflict that is between the main character, an unnamed narrator, and her husband, Stephen. Stephen wants to have a child, while the narrator does not. This is the source of the central conflict

The narrator’s husband, Stephen, has been looking forward to having a child. He brings up the subject again, but the narrator is firm in her decision to not have children. This is the source of the central conflict. The narrator resists Stephen’s request for a child, while Stephen becomes increasingly insistent.The conflict is central to the story because it drives the plot. Stephen’s desire for a child leads to tension between him and the narrator. It creates a rift between them that they are unable to bridge, despite their love for one another. This conflict ultimately leads to a rupture in their relationship. The conflict is also essential to the theme of the story. It explores the idea of the consequences of wanting different things in a relationship and what that means for the future of a relationship.

For more question “Three is a Rational Number”

https://brainly.com/question/30619075

#SPJ8

African feminism help you to create equal opportunities for female and male teachers at your school by avoiding stereotyping and given both gender equal opportunity.

Feminism is a movement targeted towards woman and this is to enhance inclusion among woman as they are left out in some important decision, Jobs and other opportunities.

Therefore, African feminism help you to create equal opportunities for female and male teachers at your school by avoiding stereotyping and given both gender equal opportunity.

Learn more on Africa below

https://brainly.com/question/27806368

#SPJ1

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Pancakes is being related to towers, but the pancakes are being referred to as towers.

Answer:

D!!

Explanation:

Answer: The meaning of from scratch, or starting from scratch, is starting from the very start again after failing to do something.

Answer:

To create something from scratch is to make it without any ingredients or materials prepared ahead of time.

Explanation:

Your answer is up top, Hope this helped, Have a great day!

As a new leader for a manufacturing project, implementing agile project management can bring numerous benefits. Agile project management is an iterative and flexible approach that emphasizes collaboration, adaptability, and delivering value to customers.

By adopting agile principles, you can enhance the efficiency, transparency, and success of your manufacturing project. Firstly, agile project management promotes effective teamwork and collaboration. It encourages cross-functional teams to work together closely, fostering better communication, knowledge sharing, and collective problem-solving. This collaborative approach enhances the efficiency of the project and increases the likelihood of meeting project goals.

Secondly, agile methodologies, such as Scrum or Kanban, enable flexibility and adaptability. They allow for incremental delivery of project components, making it easier to respond to changes in customer requirements, market conditions, or technological advancements. This adaptability reduces the risk of project delays or failure and ensures that the project remains aligned with customer expectations.

Furthermore, agile project management emphasizes continuous improvement through regular feedback loops. By incorporating feedback from stakeholders and end-users early and frequently, you can identify and address potential issues or opportunities for improvement promptly. This iterative approach leads to higher quality outcomes and customer satisfaction.

In conclusion, implementing agile project management in manufacturing can lead to improved collaboration, adaptability, and continuous improvement. By embracing these principles, you can enhance the overall project performance, meet customer expectations, and achieve better outcomes.

Know more about Agile project management here:

https://brainly.com/question/15520583

#SPJ8

Preus reveal differences between the American sailors and the Japanese fishermen when Japanese fishing vessel sinks and those that came to rescue them were the passing American ship.

The differences between the American sailors and the Japanese fishermen be described as one that have a relationship that irrespective of their region they are ready to help each other.

We can come into conclusion that  Preus reveal differences between the American sailors and the Japanese fishermen when Japanese fishing vessel sinks and those that came to rescue them were the passing American ship.

Learn more about sailors at:

https://brainly.com/question/647431

#SPJ1

NOTE; This is a complete question , no given option , even on internet.

The principle of mistake of fact is the principle in criminal law relating to honest mistake.

This principle means that a crime may be mistakenly committed without the express intention to commit such a crime.

For example, a person may take an item which he believes to be his without realizing that it is not.  Based on this honest mistake, the criminal intention of permanent property deprivation is negated.

Thus, since this mistake of fact is honest and reasonable, the effect of the principle of mistake of fact is that the person will not be found guilty of theft by the judge.

Read more about honest mistake at https://brainly.com/question/18128364

The amount of money William made this year is $2,728

Amount earned babysitting this year = $620

Percentage increase = 340%

Amount William made this year = 620 + (340% × 620)

= 620 + (3.4 × 620)

= 620 + 2,108

= 2,728

Amount William made this year = $2,728

Therefore, the amount of money William made this year is $2,728

Learn more about percentage:

https://brainly.com/question/843074

Answer:  

William made 2108

Explanation:

I got it right