Answer:Chicken....soup.. yummy in my stomach. idoit U-U
Explanation:
s
t
o
m
a
c
h
Y
u
m
what is the answer to chicken
Answer:Chicken....soup.. yummy in my stomach. idoit U-U
Explanation:
s
t
o
m
a
c
h
Y
u
m
what car did the suspects use to commit the dc sniper crimes
The suspects used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the DC sniper crimes.
The suspects in the DC sniper crimes, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan as their vehicle during the shootings. The car was modified to create a concealed shooting platform in the trunk, allowing the perpetrators to carry out their attacks covertly. The choice of this vehicle played a significant role in the nature of the crimes and their ability to evade detection.The use of the Chevrolet Caprice enabled the suspects to blend in with other vehicles on the road, making it difficult for witnesses and law enforcement to identify them during the shootings. The dark blue color and unremarkable appearance of the car further aided their efforts to remain inconspicuous. This strategic choice allowed the perpetrators to carry out their attacks without arousing immediate suspicion or drawing attention to themselves.The vehicle became a key element in the investigation, as authorities issued alerts and descriptions of the car in an effort to track down the suspects. The extensive media coverage of the vehicle and its connection to the crimes heightened public awareness and helped in the eventual capture of the perpetrators.In conclusion, the suspects in the DC sniper crimes used a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, which played a crucial role in facilitating their shootings and evading detection.For more questions on DC sniper crimes
https://brainly.com/question/30170344
#SPJ8
Blaine Yorkton, a 29-year-old accountant, had a personal page on a social networking site called Welcome All. He soon acquired several “friends,” a few of whom were strangers, who posted personal comments and jokes on his page. A few months later, Blaine was victimized by an identity thief who, after investigation by authorities, was determined to have utilized information secured from Welcome All to carry out the crime. Unable to recover the money taken from his financial accounts or correct the harm done by online use of his credit, Blaine sued Welcome All for allowing the invasion of his privacy and for negligence in not installing rules, providing warnings, or screening the “friends” network for imposters.
Blaine Yorkton sued Welcome All for invasion of privacy and negligence due to identity theft that was carried out using information from his personal page on the site. The thief was determined to have obtained the information from Welcome All and Blaine was unable to recover the money taken or correct the harm done by the online use of his credit. The lawsuit claimed that Welcome All was negligent for not having rules, warnings, or a screening process for the "friends" network to prevent imposters.
What is the statement about?This case highlights the potential privacy risks associated with sharing personal information on social networking sites. Social media platforms have become a central part of many people's lives, but they also pose significant risks to users' privacy and security.
Therefore, In this case, Blaine Yorkton's personal information was used by an identity thief to carry out a crime, and he was unable to recover the money taken or correct the harm done. By suing Welcome All, Blaine sought to hold the platform responsible for the invasion of his privacy and for failing to take adequate measures to protect his personal information.
Learn more about negligence from
https://brainly.com/question/14480857
#SPJ1
What is the most common tool used in discovery?
Warrant
Deposition
Hearsay
Brief
Deposition is the most common tool used in discovery. The correct answer would be option B.
Both sides of the case participate in 'discovery' to start the trial process. They formally exchange information regarding the witnesses and evidence they will use at trial during this procedure. Before the trial even starts, the parties might learn what evidence might be used through discovery. It is intended to prevent "trial by ambush" in which one side learns of the other's testimony or evidence only during the trial, leaving no opportunity for the other side to provide rebuttal evidence.
Taking depositions is one of the most often used discovery techniques. An out-of-court statement made under oath by any party to the lawsuit is called a deposition. It will be used during the trial or during trial preparation. It could be a written text, a videotape, or even both. Through depositions, a party can learn in advance what a witness would testify about at the trial. Important witnesses who are unable to attend the trial can nonetheless be called as witnesses through depositions.
To know more about trial see:
https://brainly.com/question/1259392
#SPJ1
Why are there different sentences for different crimes? Why are there different sentences for the same crime?
The existence of different sentences for different crimes and variations in sentencing for the same crime can be attributed to several factors within the legal systems of different jurisdictions.
Why are there different sentences for different crimes, and different sentences for the same crime?Here are a few key reasons for these differences:
Crimes differ greatly in terms of their seriousness and effects on society. Different penalties are given for various offenses in legal systems in an effort to represent this variety. For instance, crimes like murder or armed robbery are typically seen as more serious and subject to harsher punishments than less serious crimes like petty theft or simple assault.Legislative discretion: Lawmakers have the power to adopt laws and amend them, including choosing the punishments for certain offences. Due to their discretion, legislators are able to weigh a variety of variables when determining punishments, including the potential harm that will be done, society norms and values, issues with public safety, and the necessity for deterrent or rehabilitation.Legal precedent and case-specific factors can also have an impact on how sentencing rules are applied. Legal precedents are established by earlier court rulings. The particulars of a case, such as the defendant's criminal history, purpose, level of involvement, mitigating or aggravating circumstances, and the discretion used by judges or juries, may result in different sentences.Learn more on crime sentence here https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
What is the most important condition for the probation system to function?
O a well-paid staff
O good judges and court supervisors
O well-trained dedicated probation officers
O the support of a community
Well-trained dedicated probation officers will most affect will be is the most important condition for the probation system to function
Option C
What is probation system to functionProbation is respponsibe for publishing appropriate pre-sentence reports for judges in the courts toto help them to choose the most accurate sentence.
Well-trained dedicated probation officers will most affect will be is the most important condition for the probation system to function
Option C
More on Law
https://brainly.com/question/17956416
Determine if the statement is true or false. Periods of major change lead to social disorganization that in turn lowers the crime rate, according to social ecological theory.
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
Social disorganization is a theoretical perspective that explains ecological differences in levels of crime based on structural and cultural factors shaping the nature of the social order across communities. This approach narrowed the focus of earlier sociological studies on the covariates of urban growth to examine the spatial concentration and stability of rates of criminal behavior. According to the social disorganization framework, such phenomena are triggered by the weakened social integration of neighborhoods because of the absence of self-regulatory mechanisms, which in turn are due to the impact of structural factors on social interactions or the presence of delinquent subcultures.
what is the rule of law
one of the basic principles of democracy system.
Explanation:
It is a pillar on which thedemocracy system is constructed.
according to this principle every one is equal before the law.
In a democracy system no one is above the law!
In CIVIL LAW, what is a PLAINTIFF?
Answer: The person who wanted the lawsuit first
Explanation:
Basically the person who initiated the lawsuit and wants to go to court because of the second parties actions.
How does specialization enable countries to trade with one another?
Answer:
Specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing. This can be because they have an abundance of a particular resource, such as oil or timber, or because they have developed expertise in a particular industry, such as manufacturing or technology. By specializing in the production of certain goods or services, countries can take advantage of economies of scale and produce a larger quantity at a lower cost.
For example, a country with an abundance of fertile land and a favorable climate for agriculture may specialize in producing and exporting food products, such as grains or fruits. Another country with a strong technology sector may specialize in producing and exporting high-tech goods, such as computers or smartphones. By trading with one another, these countries can each specialize in what they are best at and benefit from the lower prices and higher quality of the goods and services that they import.
Specialization also enables countries to take advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. For example, a country with a lower cost of labor may be able to produce goods at a lower cost than another country, making it more competitive in the global market. By specializing in the production of goods that they can produce at a lower cost, countries can increase their exports and boost their economies.
Overall, specialization enables countries to trade with one another by allowing them to focus on producing and exporting the goods and services that they are most efficient at producing, and by taking advantage of differences in the cost of production and labor. This helps to create a more efficient global economy and allows countries to benefit from the goods and services produced by other countries.
What is a police officer who works inside of a school called?
(Select all that apply.)
school liaison officer
community police officer
school-based police officer
school enforcer
Answer:
school liaison officer
school based police officer
Answer:
School liaison officer
School-based police officer
Who Was First King Of Nepal
Answer:
Explanation:
The first king of Nepal was King Prithvi Narayan Shah. He was born on January 11, 1723, and ruled from 1768 until his death in 1775. King Prithvi Narayan Shah was the founder of the modern Kingdom of Nepal and the Shah dynasty, which ruled Nepal until 2008 when the country became a federal democratic republic. He is widely regarded as a unifying figure and is credited with the unification of Nepal and the establishment of Nepal as a sovereign kingdom.
Identify judicial processes from pretrial to appeal
Judicial processes can vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system, but in general, they include the following stages: Pretrial,Trial,Verdict,Sentencing,Appeals,Post-appeal
1. Pretrial: This is the stage before a trial begins and includes activities such as investigation, arrest, booking, and bail hearings. During this stage, the prosecution and defense gather evidence and build their cases.
2. Trial: This is the stage where the case is presented to a judge or jury. Witnesses are called, evidence is presented, and arguments are made by the prosecution and defense.
3. Verdict: Once the trial is over, the judge or jury delivers a verdict of guilty or not guilty. If the defendant is found guilty, the judge will typically schedule a sentencing hearing.
4. Sentencing: During this stage, the judge determines the appropriate punishment for the defendant based on the severity of the crime and any aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
5. Appeals: If the defendant is found guilty, they may have the right to appeal the verdict to a higher court. The appeals court will review the case to determine if any legal errors were made during the trial that may have affected the outcome.
6. Post-appeal: If the defendant is unsuccessful in their appeal, they may have limited options to challenge the ruling, such as filing a habeas corpus petition or seeking executive clemency.
These stages of the judicial process can involve numerous legal procedures, rules, and requirements that are designed to ensure that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.
For more such questions on jurisdiction
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ11
What was the basic premise of the claim by Mike's Train
House (MTH) against Lionel that involved
trade secrets?
are you a Christian? :)
Answer:
Sorry for late reply
Yeah i am, i was always one and still be on :)
God bless
Write one paragraph (4-5 sentences) on what a police officer must do upon arriving at a traffic accident.
Can someone please help it's needed now thank you.
true or false,, The juvenile and criminal justice systems are the same, only the ages of the offenders differ.
Answer:
Juveniles are tried in what is called an adjudication hearing instead of a public trial with a jury. ... While the goal of the adult crime system is to punish, the goal of the juvenile crime system is rehabilitation and doing what's in the best interest of the minor.
Explanation:
In 1972, U.S. courts ruled that the members of the National Socialist (NAZI) Party could not be banned from marching in a largely Jewish neighborhood of Chicago. Many of the residents of this neighborhood were Holocaust Survivors, to whom seeing this march would be horribly painful. On what understanding of the right of peaceful assembly might the court have made this ruling?
1.There were fewer Holocaust survivors than National Socialists, so the rule of the majority came into play.
2.The National Socialists had the right to assemble peacefully and march, despite how unpopular their views might be.
3.The NAZI point of view was rejected by society as a whole, so they could not march in this Jewish area, but must march elsewhere.
4.It would be okay for them to march as long as they didn’t wear NAZI uniforms, which might promote violence.
The correct answer choice is (2). The court's ruling was based on the understanding that the National Socialists had the right to assemble peacefully and march, despite how unpopular their views might be.
We all have the right to assemble peacefully and to form association with others. We have the right to form or to join trade unions in the act of protecting our interests.
If any restrictions are placed on this right, then they are according to the law and necessary in the interest of national security and public order. The restrictions can be placed for the prevention of crime or mishap, for the protection of freedom of others and for maintaining law and order situation in the area.
To know more about right to assemble here
https://brainly.com/question/2141285
#SPJ1
Which of the following is a valid judgement of the year 2000
presidential election
Answer:
If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
Answer:
If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
Explanation:
Have a great day
Which situation is
an example of indirect taxation?
HELP!!!
An individual is convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison. What factor would influence the type of facility in which the individual is housed?
The security needed
Which facilities have open beds
The type of crime committed
All of the above
Answer:
pretrial detention
Explanation:
Why do many poisonings go undetected in our modern day?
OB.
C.
D.
because poison testing is very expensive
because poison testing is unreliable
because there are no routine procedures for poison testing
because poison testing can only be carried out by forensic toxicologists with at least 15 years of experience
Poisonings go undetected in our modern day because poison testing can only be carried out by forensic toxicologists with at least 15 years of experience.
Injury or death brought on by ingesting, breathing, touching, or injecting various medications, chemicals, venoms, or gases is referred to as poisoning. Many chemicals, including medicines and carbon monoxide, become hazardous at larger dosages or concentrations. Pesticides, personal care and topical goods, and cleaning chemicals are some of the top 10 household products that cause poisoning exposures experience each year. Poisonings at work result from exposure to a range of chemicals. Over 90% of toxic exposures take place at home.
To learn more about Poisonings, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8439604
#SPJ1
Successful safety and health programs _______ hazards and control methods.
Answer:
prevent , identify and control are the three answers
Explanation:
It is what it is
Successful safety and health programs identify hazards and control methods.
Proactive in nature, successful safety and health programs seek to identify potential hazards in the workplace. They identify potential dangers to workers and guests through methodical hazard assessments and risk analyses. To identify any potential risks these programs thoroughly examine the working environment, work procedures, equipment and materials. Effective control methods are implemented to reduce risks and create a safer working environment after hazards have been identified.
Engineering controls, administrative controls and personal protective equipment (PPE) are examples of control measures. The ongoing effectiveness of the controls put in place is guaranteed by routine evaluation and monitoring. These programs promote a safer workplace, safeguard employees and lower the risk of accidents and injuries by diligently addressing hazards and putting control strategies into place.
learn more about personal protective equipment here
brainly.com/question/32468648
#SPJ3
Why is it so important that people know their rights? In this scenario, what is the relationship between being told and understanding one's rights, and actually being protected by them?
It is important for people to know their rights because having knowledge of one's rights empowers individuals and allows them to assert their rights in situations where they may be violated.
How does this help?Knowing one's rights helps individuals understand what is and isn't acceptable treatment, and can also serve as a deterrent to those who may attempt to infringe on them.
However, knowing one's rights is just one step in the process of being protected by them. Understanding one's rights also requires an understanding of the legal systems and mechanisms in place for enforcing those rights.
In many cases, individuals must take active steps to assert their rights, such as filing a complaint or seeking legal recourse, in order for their rights to be protected.
Read more about human rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/29053036
#SPJ`1
This road sign means
Answer:
It means there is road work ahead. Construction stuff to look out for.
Answer:
road work ahead
Explanation:
Think about coverage you’ve seen of high-profile crimes or court cases. What do you think is helpful about media coverage of these stories? What do you think is problematic?
Answer: Encouraging the courts to make the right choice
Explanation:
Media coverage is beneficial in the sense that it can keep the American public informed on rulings that would fundamentally set the groundwork for future rulings. For example take the case of the State of Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin. This was a rare example of a police officer being punished for grave misdeeds.
Media coverage may put pressure on a court to make a right decision. However in some cases this can become problematic, swaying the jury one way or another and making them partial when they are to remain impartial.
In what case did the court decide that citizens of one state could bring a suit against citizens of another state?.
Answer:
Hans v. Louisiana
Explanation:
Hans v. Louisiana is the case did the court decide that citizens of one state could bring a suit against citizens of another state.
What is Hans v. Louisiana?The United States Supreme Court held in Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890), that the Eleventh Amendment forbids a citizen of a U.S. state from suing that state in a federal court. For disputes involving the federal constitution and federal laws, citizens cannot sue their own state.
The Eleventh Amendment forbids federal courts from having jurisdiction over state defendants; in fact, if a state is the defendant, the federal court will not even hear the matter. A state must accede to jurisdiction in order for its citizens or citizens of another state to suit it in federal court.
The United States' judicial authority cannot be interpreted to include any lawsuit, whether it was filed years ago or is still pending.
Thus, Hans v. Louisiana.
For more information about Hans v. Louisiana, click here
https://brainly.com/question/597934
#SPJ6
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
Answer:
Essentially, the difference between void and voidable contracts is enforceability: a void contract is illegal and unenforceable; a voidable contract is legal and enforceable. Void contracts. A contract that is void is unenforceable, meaning that neither party has legal recourse against the other for a breach
Explanation:
What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? (Select all that apply.) Responses To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence during a criminal trial.
What is evidence?Evidence is any type of proof that is used to support a claim or conclusion. It can be physical, such as an object or document, or it can be testimonial, such as a witness providing a statement. Evidence is often used in legal proceedings to prove a point of law or fact. It can also be used in scientific research to support or refute a hypothesis. Evidence can also be used in everyday life to support an argument or decision. In any situation, evidence should be reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the claim or conclusion.
This rule ensures that police do not arrest people without a legal cause, that evidence is collected legally, and that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. Additionally, it ensures that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
To learn more about evidence
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ1