What is one significant takeaway about William Jennings Bryan running as a Democratic candidate in the election of 1896

Answer:

A. Democrats and Republicans

Answer:

Democrats and Republicans

Answer:

Virginia other Southern Colonies

Explanation:

Virginia and other Southern colonies settled by They wrere maintained stronger ties with Britain.

Hopefully this helps your answer to this question!

Answer:

Battle of Lexington and Concord

Explanation:

The process described in the text is called "romanticizing" or "romanticization".

Romanticization refers to the transformation of something into an idealized or ideal form, often by adding cultural or symbolic meaning to it.

In the context of the plantation homes of slave owners, romanticization involved the use of architectural styles and symbols associated with democracy and classical antiquity, such as Greek and Roman columns, to create the impression of a grand and noble estate.

By using these symbols, the plantation homes were transformed from mere residences into grand palaces that were meant to evoke a sense of power, prestige, and cultural superiority.

However, this romanticization also served to mask the reality of the plantation system, which was based on the exploitation and oppression of enslaved people.

By creating an idealized vision of the plantation home, slave owners were able to perpetuate the myth of the "benevolent" or "paternalistic" slave owner who was simply taking care of their enslaved workers, rather than recognizing the true brutality and inhumanity of the system.

To know more about romanticization refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/1596946

#SPJ11

Answer:

It would be more expensive to buy now than last year.  Because now, this year, you would need more of their money to buy their supplies due to inflation.

good luck, i hope this helps :)

Explanation:

Answer:

The author sets a limited view of the topic.

Explanation:

They don't offer the other point of view. Facts may be omitted from the source. There may be additional information needed.

The MacArthur Fellow and Nebula and Hugo Award-winning author referred to in your question is Octavia Butler.

She was a MacArthur Fellow and won both the Nebula and Hugo Awards for her work in science fiction and fantasy. The inspirational note you mentioned was discovered in her personal journal after her death in 2006. The author you are referring to is Octavia Butler.

Scholars working on her personal papers after her death in 2006 discovered an inspirational note that she had written to herself in her personal journal in 1988. Octavia Butler was a highly respected author in the genres of sci-fi and fantasy, known for her powerful and thought-provoking works that often tackled themes of race, gender, and power dynamics. Her influence on the genre is still felt today, and she is widely regarded as one of the most important and groundbreaking authors in the field.

She was a renowned science fiction and fantasy writer who received numerous awards for her work, including MacArthur Fellowship, Nebula Awards, and Hugo Awards. The inspirational note you mentioned was found in her personal journal and reflected her ambitions and determination to succeed in her writing career.

To know more about Octavia Butler

visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30636813

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is: A ( It is a bridge)

Answer:

Early in the morning of Sunday 7 December 1941, hundreds of Japanese aircraft launched a surprise assault on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor, killing more than 2,400 Americans. Jonny Wilkes talks to Professor Robert Cribb about whether the United States would still have entered World War II without, as their president put it, a “date which will live in infamy”

Answer:

Sample Answer 1:

I believe the United States would have entered the war even without the attack on Pearl Harbor. The United States desperately needed to help fight the Axis powers and felt an obligation to its allies. So although the United States might not have entered the war as early as it did as a result of the Pearl Harbor attack, I think it would have at some point even without that event.

Sample Answer 2:

I do not believe the United States would have entered the war if the attack on Pearl Harbor had not occurred. There was a strong belief by many Americans that neutrality was the best policy, and they would not have given their support for the war if not for the attack.

Explanation:

edmentum :)

Answer:

Summary of the Gilded Age:

During the Gilded Age, proponents of laissez-faire policies opposed government intervention in society or the market. Laissez-faire ideology influenced government policies toward labor relations and Reconstruction.

Explanation:

Anwser Above.

Answer:

Colonists opposed the Dominion of New England because they believed

Answer:

Your answer is:

Answer:

LOOK AT IMAGE. MARK AS BRAINLIEST. TY AND PLEASE.

Imperial competition among the awesome powers contributed to both World War I and World War II through competitions over colonies, financial interests, expansionist plans, uncertain issues from past conflicts, and the breakdown of discretion and worldwide arrangement. 

Here are some of the contributions of imperial competition to the outbreak of -

world war I-

World war II

know more about imperial competition

https://brainly.com/question/19933611

#SPJ4

The mass movement was motivated by a desire to avoid racial violence and pursue economic and educational opportunities.

The Great Migration is typically divided into two parts that correspond to the United States' involvement and effects in both World Wars. Migration has played an important role in African history. The human species most likely began spreading across the earth between 2 and 2.5 million years ago, both within and outside of Africa.

Population movements in Africa during the pro-colonial era were mostly related to the prevailing sociopolitical and ecological conditions, particularly internecine violence, natural calamities, and the hunt for arable land or colonization.

Learn more about immigration here:

https://brainly.com/question/17141328

Answer:

Part A: World War I and the Great Depression led to a rise of totalitarianism in several ways. The war had a devastating economic impact on many countries and the subsequent depression caused widespread poverty and suffering, leading many people to look to powerful leaders who promised to provide stability and order. This created an environment in which authoritarian and totalitarian governments could flourish. The chaos and uncertainty of the period also provided an opportunity for these regimes to consolidate their power and control through censorship and propaganda.

Part B: The Axis powers were Germany, Italy, and Japan. They took aggressive actions to expand their territory, such as Germany’s invasion of Czechoslovakia and Poland, Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia and Albania, and Japan’s occupation of Manchuria and parts of China. These actions were part of a larger strategy of creating a “New Order” in Europe and Asia.

Part C: The policy of appeasement was a strategy of allowing aggressive Axis expansion in exchange for peace. It was most famously used by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in 1938 when he signed the Munich Agreement, which allowed Nazi Germany to annex parts of Czechoslovakia. This policy was also used by other countries, such as France and the Soviet Union, in an attempt to avoid war.

Part D: The policy of appeasement ultimately failed and led to WWII because it gave the Axis powers the impression that their expansionist ambitions would be tolerated. This emboldened them to take further aggressive actions, such as Germany’s invasion of Poland in 1939, which resulted in Britain and France declaring war on Germany and the beginning of World War II.

Explanation:

Answer:

B. transportation system

Hope this helps!

In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals. This is the correct option where the historians argument does not rely on historical evidence.

A political movement is an organised effort by a group of individuals to alter societal norms or governmental policies. Political movements are typically opposed to some aspect of the status quo and are frequently linked to a particular ideology. Political movements and political parties are connected in that both seek to influence the government and that political movements have historically given rise to a number of political parties.

Anything intimately connected to a prior event, person, or era is considered historical evidence. It gives details that could aid in our understanding of what occurred before our examination. A historian starts by looking for and gathering various pieces of evidence related to the particular history they are researching. They must take into account which of the evidence's sources are primary and which are secondary when doing so.

Learn more about French Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/6665402

#SPJ1

Answer:

hola esmosv

Explanation:

1234

Answer: Cotton Growing

Explanation: It became so profitable for enslavers that it greatly increased their demand for both land and enslaved labor.

Fascism is an extreme right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political philosophy and movement that is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, and the coercive repression of dissent.

How Fascism gained popularity?

The political philosophy of fascism is intricate and malleable, and it gained popularity in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s.

The National Fascist Party of Benito Mussolini, which ruled Italy from 1922 to 1943, and the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazi Party), which ruled Germany from 1933 to 1945, are two of the most infamous instances of fascist administrations.

Fascism has several different definitions; some say it is a mass movement, a political theory, or a collection of political acts. Fascism's fundamental traits are up for discussion, while most definitions concur that it is dictatorial and actively encourages nationalism.

To know more about Fascism visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16475365

#SPJ1

The explorer's expectations of the First Peoples and their values are revealed in the passage by his description of Matonabbee.

The explorer notes that Matonabbee is "going to Prince of Wales's Fort, with furrs, and other articles for trade." This suggests that the explorer expects the First Peoples to be active participants in the fur trade. The fur trade was a major economic activity in the North American Arctic in the 18th century, and it was essential to the economy of the Hudson's Bay Company.

The values of the First Peoples in the 18th century were largely based on their traditional way of life. They were hunter-gatherers who lived in small groups. They were skilled in hunting, fishing, and trapping. They were also skilled in making clothing, shelter, and tools.

Find out more on the First Peoples at https://brainly.com/question/367033

#SPJ1

Answer:What is osteology?A) The scientific study of the human skeleton.

Explanation:

Answer-

Explain- Osteology is the study of bones. Osteology is important to studying human variation, and primatology. Paleoanthropology relies on osteology because most fossils come from bones. Forensic anthropology uses osteology to solve crimes.

Answer: What we can learn from older people is what it was like in the 1960s and how much the world has changed. They can also teach us a great deal about world war 2 and how much humanity has changed. Also, they're just fun to talk to sometimes.

hope this helps (:

Primary source

annual report for the year 2014 issued by fault motor company, the letter of Abigail Adam by Abigail Adam,  narrative of the life Frederick Douglas and American slave by Frederick dockless

Secondary source

A matter of choice memories of a female physicist by day ajzenberg seleove, baseball by can burns a documentary film about the history of baseball, analysis of a drawing by Leonardo da Vinci in National geographic magazine

The closest sources to the information's source are referred to as primary sources. They need to be interpreted by academics because they are raw data. Secondary sources frequently interpret main sources since they are connected to them.

Thus, statement are matched

For more details about Primary source, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/24511160

#SPJ1

Before entering an enjoyable afterlife, the deceased Egyptian supposedly would be judged by Osiris and other divine judges.

In ancient Egyptian religion, it was believed that death was not the end of a person's existence, but rather the beginning of a journey to the afterlife. The afterlife was seen as a continuation of earthly life, in which the deceased would enjoy the same pleasures and activities they had enjoyed in life. In order to reach this afterlife, however, the deceased had to pass through a series of judgments and tests.

The most important of these judgments was the judgment by Osiris and other divine judges. The deceased's heart was weighed against the feather of truth, and if it was found to be heavy with sin, the deceased would be devoured by a monster known as Ammit. To prepare for this judgment, the deceased would recite spells and formulas known as the "Book of the Dead," which provided instructions on how to navigate the afterlife and avoid obstacles along the way.

The idea of buying access to heaven with offerings to the gods or building a pyramid is not accurate. While offerings were certainly made to the gods in order to gain their favor and protection, and pyramids were built to serve as tombs for the pharaohs, neither of these practices were necessary for an individual to achieve a successful journey to the afterlife.

Learn more about Egyptian here

https://brainly.com/question/20262049

#SPJ11