What is Benjamin Franklin saying about humanity and infallibility?

The option best explains the struggle between human beings and nature in the above poem Ozymandias by Percy Bysshe Shelley depicts that human are powerless compare by the power of nature. Option A.

The poem Ozymandias is a sonnet poem  by Percy Bysshe,  was first published in 1818 gets one to  ponder on the transient essence of power, value of humility how the proud and tyranny  ruler are brought low in death.

Ozymandias is the Greek name for Ramesses II, the poem describes the huge ruins of a great pharaoh’s statue with an inscription ''Ozymandias, King of Kings'' and parts dilapidated the statue sunk desert sand

The desert , the sand and dilapidated statue gives the indication of the  central idea or theme  of the poem , it portrays  the vanity of human actions and their  fate

Learn more about Ozymandias on brainly.com/question/29031735

#SPJ1

Answer:

If the White Sox scandal were to happen now, it would quickly spread. On social media, users will publish and comment in a variety of ways. The players' sense of security will be destroyed as a result. Unfortunately, they are going to be harassed. Indeed, it can alter their entire outlook on life.

Explanation:

This is my opinion only so please feel free to alter as you see fit. Paraphrase (put in your own words to avoid plagiarism).

Answer:it is a compound sentence

if this helped a thanks or even better a brainliest!

have a great day

In the first column, we can record the following original sentences: "The darkness in his room was tick and black" and "my easy, quiet manner made the policeman believe my story."

These sentences can be modified as follows:

The new words are synonymous with the words used in the original sentence. This means that these words are different, but they keep the same meaning, without changing the message that the author wanted to convey.

In addition, we can say that the word "intense" highlights how much darkness was in the room, while the word "calm" shows how the narrator acted in an easy way, which did not arouse suspicion.

Learn more about synonyms:

https://brainly.com/question/23925209

#SPJ1

Answer:

Children in ancient Greece played with many toys

Explanation:

i just took the test on edge 2020

Answer:

Children in ancient Greece played with toys.

Explanation:

The sentence connects to the central idea that children in ancient Greece played with toys because it shows examples of the toys children played with.

I also took the test and got 100%

Hope this helps!

An independent clause with a subject and a predicate is a verb clause. Verb actions are carried out through verb phrases. A verb sentence is a type of grammar. Verb clauses serve four grammatical purposes: declaration or statement, exclamation, question, imperative or imperative. 

Verb phrases can be used to express four different grammatical concepts. Instructions, exclamation points, queries, and commands. Noun clauses perform nine tasks. Subject, Subject Complement, Direct Object, Object Complement, Indirect Object, Prepositional Complement, Noun Phrase Complement, Adjective Phrase Complement, Appositive. 

Grammatical clauses are groups of words that include similar subjects and verbs. As a sentence communicates information regarding what the subject is up to or is doing, it is crucial to make this connection.

An independent sentence is a sequence of words that represents a complete thought and has a subject and a verb. A sentence is a standalone clause. In a confectionery shop, James was reviewing for a chemical test. A subordinate clause is a group of words that has a subject, a verb, and does not fully articulate the notion being expressed.

To know more about verb clauses, click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/30109261

Actual question: What kind of clause has a grammatical function?

A risk of the writer's rhetorical strategy in lines 204-209 ("| can think . . . upon earth") is that the audience may take offense to the author's direct description of the wealthy Irish as the target. The writer explicitly mentions that his proposal aims to lessen the number of people in the kingdom of Ireland, which may be perceived as offensive or insulting to those who fall into that category. This can alienate and antagonize the audience, causing them to reject or dismiss the writer's argument.

Furthermore, the audience may believe that the writer truly has abandoned the "expedients" he catalogs.

The writer dismisses other potential solutions and claims to offer a unique remedy for Ireland, but this may be seen as disingenuous or lacking credibility. The audience may question the writer's sincerity and doubt the effectiveness or feasibility of the proposed solution.

Additionally, the audience may perceive the writer as mean-spirited and unreliable in his message.

The tone of the passage, particularly the references to taxing absentees, rejecting foreign luxury, and criticizing the behavior of women, can be interpreted as harsh or judgmental.

This can undermine the writer's ethos and make it difficult for the audience to trust or sympathize with his perspective.

Moreover, some individuals may oppose the idea of population control, especially in regard to Catholics. The writer's explicit intention to reduce the number of people in Ireland may clash with religious beliefs or personal values held by the audience.

This can generate strong opposition and resistance to the writer's argument.

Lastly, there is a possibility that some audience members may embrace the enactment of those "expedients" in an attempt to improve the situation.

Despite the potential risks and controversies associated with the writer's rhetorical strategy, there may be individuals who view the proposed measures as necessary or beneficial for the kingdom.

They may be willing to overlook or justify the offensive language and embrace the ideas presented as a means to address the issues at hand.

For more such questions on rhetorical strategy, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/18388316

#SPJ8

A slippery slope fallacy claims that an event will result in a series of other events that are often negative in nature.

A slippery slope fallacy is a type of fallacy that assumes that because of a single event, a series of other negative events will arise.

The assumption in this type of fallacy is that there is a negative relationship between the series of events. The basic nature of this fallacy is the assumption that might be untrue in most cases.

Learn more about slippery slope here:

https://brainly.com/question/21728805

#SPJ1

Answer:

Correct: How Whales Filter Food

Too Broad: Humpback whales

Detail: The digestive system of humpback whales

Explanation:

hilarious how the ela question has a typo

In "To Build a Fire," the man ignores the old timer's advice and travels alone. This shows that D. He is stubborn and overconfident.

"To Build a Fire," a short story by Jack London, is the tragic account of a man who decides to journey alone through the difficult environment of the Yukon in sub-freezing temperatures and falls victim to nature's merciless and unforgiving might.

The moral of the story is to listen to those with more experience and not to be arrogant. In his hubris, the man disregarded an old-advise timer's to never go alone in temperatures of -50 or below.

The anonymous man in the story falls for the final time at the end of "To Build a Fire." He stands up and considers "facing death with dignity." He decides that going to sleep is his best option because he will freeze to death anyhow.

In the story, it should be noted that the fact that the man was overconfident and stubborn resulted in his death.

In conclusion, the correct option is D.

Learn more about To Build A Fire on:

https://brainly.com/question/6699825

#SPJ1

Answer:

Frederick Douglass is one of the most celebrated writers in the African American literary tradition, and his first autobiography is the one of the most widely read North American slave narratives. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave was published in 1845, less than seven years after Douglass escaped from slavery. The book was an instant success, selling 4,500 copies in the first four months. Throughout his life, Douglass continued to revise and expand his autobiography, publishing a second version in 1855 as My Bondage and My Freedom. The third version of Douglass' autobiography was published in 1881 as Life and Times of Frederick Douglass, and an expanded version of Life and Times was published in 1892. These various retellings of Douglass' story all begin with his birth and childhood, but each new version emphasizes the mutual influence and close correlation of Douglass' life with key events in American history.

Like many slave narratives, Douglass' Narrative is prefaced with endorsements by white abolitionists. In his preface, William Lloyd Garrison pledges that Douglass's Narrative is "essentially true in all its statements; that nothing has been set down in malice, nothing exaggerated" (p. viii). Likewise, Wendell Phillips pledges "the most entire confidence in [Douglass'] truth, candor, and sincerity" (p. xiv). Though Douglass counted Garrison and Phillips as friends, scholars such as Beth A. McCoy have argued that their letters serve as subtle reminders of white power over the black author and his text. Indeed, in all of his subsequent autobiographies, Douglass replaced Garrison and Phillips' endorsements with introductions by prominent black abolitionists and legal scholars.

Douglass begins his Narrative with what he knows about his birth in Tuckahoe, Maryland—or more precisely, what he does not know. "I have no accurate knowledge of my age," Douglass states; nor can he positively identify his father (p. 1). Douglass notes that it was "whispered that my master was my father . . . [but] the means of knowing was withheld from me" (p. 2). He recalls that he was separated from his mother "before I knew her as my mother," and that he saw her only "four or five times in my life" (p. 2). This separation of mothers from children, and lack of knowledge about age and paternity, Douglass explains, was common among slaves: "it is the wish of most masters . . . to keep their slaves thus ignorant" (p. 1).

As a child on the plantation of Colonel Edward Lloyd, Douglass witnesses brutal whippings of various slaves—male and female, old and young. But for the most part, he describes his childhood as a typical or representative story, rather than a unique or individual narrative. "[M]y own treatment . . . was very similar to that of the other slave children," he writes (p. 26). The early chapters of his Narrative emphasize the status of slaves and the nature of slavery over his individual experience. "I had no bed," he writes. "[I would] sleep on the cold, damp, clay floor, with my head in [a sack for carrying corn] and feet out" (p. 27). This description explicitly links Douglass' experience back to that of the other slaves: "old and young, male and female, married and single, drop down side by side, on one common bed,—the cold, damp floor,—each covering himself or herself with their miserable

Explanation:

A guide to follow and sample of a formal letter has been given below.

A letter to the minister of education is a formal letter. When writing a formal letter, it's important to use a professional tone and address the recipient by their appropriate title.

Provide your contact information, use a formal salutation, and clearly state the purpose of the letter in the opening paragraph. Provide any necessary supporting information in the body of the letter, and close the letter by summarizing your main points and reiterating your purpose. Sign the letter by hand and carefully proofread and edit it for errors. By following these steps, you can create a clear, concise, and effective formal letter.

A sample of how to write such letter is given below to guide you:

Dear Honorable Minister of Education,

I am writing to share with you my deep appreciation for the value of education and to emphasize its critical importance for individuals and society as a whole.

Education is essential for personal and professional growth, as it equips individuals with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to succeed in various fields. It also helps to expand individuals' perspectives, challenge their assumptions, and foster critical thinking skills, which are vital for making informed decisions and navigating complex issues.

Moreover, education is a critical driver of social mobility, as it provides individuals from diverse backgrounds with the opportunity to access better opportunities and improve their lives. It also plays a crucial role in promoting equality, as it can help to break down barriers to education and empower marginalized individuals to achieve their full potential.

In conclusion, I urge you to continue investing in and supporting educational programs and initiatives that promote lifelong learning, expand access to education, and foster personal and social development.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

Learn more about formal letter on:

https://brainly.com/question/26430877

#SPJ1

Answer:

In the story, the second group of aliens make it seem as if humans have been treating the first group of aliens with kindness and tolerance and despite that they have been violent and abusive. This contradicts their words because the first group of aliens actually behaved well, humbly, and politely but the humans are the ones who have mistreated them - even killed them.

Explanation:

This passage from Shakespeare's play Macbeth foreshadows the future event of Macbeth killing the king. Macbeth's reference to the Prince of Cumberland (Malcolm) indicates that he sees Malcolm as an obstacle in his path to power. The phrase "on which I must fall down, or else o'erleap" suggests that Macbeth is contemplating the need to overcome this obstacle, even if it means committing a terrible act. So the right option is (C)  Macbeth killing the king.

When Macbeth says "Stars, hide your fires; Let not light see my black and deep desires," he is asking the stars to conceal his dark thoughts and ambitions.

This implies that Macbeth is aware of the gravity of his potential actions and wishes to keep them hidden from others and himself. The line "The eye wink at the hand; yet let that be, Which the eye fears, when it is done, to see" further demonstrates Macbeth's internal conflict, as he recognizes the potential consequences of his actions but is still drawn towards committing them.

In summary, this passage foreshadows Macbeth's decision to kill the king, revealing his deep-seated ambitions and the internal struggle he faces as he contemplates committing regicide.

For more questions on: Shakespeare's

https://brainly.com/question/7592021

#SPJ8

Telling the truth is a fundamental value that most people hold in high regard. Honesty and integrity are important traits that contribute to a person's character and reputation.

However, there are situations where telling the truth may be hurtful or damaging to others. This essay will argue against always telling the truth and being honest even in situations that may be hurtful to others.

An argumentative essay is a type of academic writing where the author presents a controversial issue and argues for or against a particular position. The essay should be well-structured, organized, and clearly articulate the author's stance on the issue.

Learn more about argumentative essays, here:

https://brainly.com/question/15727685

#SPJ1

The sentence that uses the proper APA source citation to prevent plagiarism is: "Benjamin Franklin's newspaper was instrumental in making political cartoons popular during the 1700s (Jan White, 2010, p. 16)." (Option C)

Plagiarism is defined as presenting someone else's work or ideas as your own, with or without their authorization, by integrating it into your work without giving full credit.

This definition encompasses all published and unpublished content, whether in handwritten, printed, or electronic form.

There are various kinds of plagiarism. They include but are not limited to:

Learn more about plagiarism:
https://brainly.com/question/397668
#SPJ1

Answer:

dashes,I guess-------------+

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The most effective way for the director of a play about colonialism to draw parallels between colonialism and current social issues would be:

C. By introducing the play with classical music.

While all the options listed may have some impact, introducing the play with classical music can create a powerful juxtaposition between the historical context of colonialism and the present-day social issues. Classical music is often associated with traditional and established structures, which can reflect the historical power dynamics of colonialism. By incorporating classical music, the director can evoke a sense of historical continuity and prompt the audience to make connections between past and present.

However, it's important to note that drawing parallels between colonialism and current social issues can involve various creative elements, such as dialogue, staging, characterization, and thematic exploration. The choice of music alone is just one aspect that contributes to the overall impact of the play in highlighting these parallels.

Answer:

Title: Shirley Chisholm's Bid for Presidency: A Rhetorical Analysis

Introduction:

Shirley Chisholm's historic bid for the United States presidency in 1972 marked a watershed moment in American political history. As the first African American woman to seek a major party nomination, Chisholm's campaign was a powerful rhetorical endeavor that challenged societal norms, addressed issues of race and gender, and aimed to redefine the American political landscape. Through a careful analysis of Chisholm's speeches and campaign strategies, this essay explores the rhetorical techniques employed by the trailblazing candidate and examines how they shaped public discourse and perceptions of her candidacy.

I. Ethos: Establishing Chisholm's Credibility

Shirley Chisholm utilized ethos as a powerful rhetorical tool to establish her credibility as a candidate. As an experienced politician and a representative of New York's 12th Congressional District, she presented herself as a knowledgeable and capable leader. Chisholm's emphasis on her personal background as a child of immigrant parents and a product of Brooklyn's working-class neighborhoods served to connect with diverse constituencies, making her relatable to voters. By drawing on her track record of activism and legislative accomplishments, Chisholm effectively established her ethos and positioned herself as a competent contender for the presidency.

II. Logos: Addressing the Issues

Chisholm's campaign was characterized by her skillful use of logos, appealing to reason and logic in addressing the pressing issues of the time. From advocating for educational reform to tackling poverty and inequality, she crafted policy-driven arguments that highlighted her progressive agenda. Chisholm's speeches were rooted in facts, statistics, and evidence, enabling her to present well-reasoned arguments that resonated with her audience. By framing her campaign around substantive issues, Chisholm demonstrated her commitment to addressing the concerns of ordinary Americans and positioned herself as a competent problem-solver.

III. Pathos: Inspiring Emotional Connections

Pathos played a crucial role in Chisholm's campaign, enabling her to forge emotional connections with voters. As an African American woman in a predominantly white, male political landscape, Chisholm drew on her personal experiences of marginalization and discrimination to evoke empathy and inspire action. Through impassioned speeches that emphasized justice, equality, and the fight against systemic oppression, she tapped into the emotions of her supporters, urging them to join her movement for transformative change. By fostering a sense of collective identity and shared struggle, Chisholm effectively harnessed the power of pathos to unite and mobilize her base.

IV. Challenges and Resilience: Overcoming Rhetorical Barriers

Chisholm's bid for presidency faced numerous rhetorical challenges, stemming from deeply entrenched biases and prejudices. As a woman and an African American, she confronted skepticism and resistance from both within and outside her party. Nevertheless, Chisholm's resilient rhetoric refused to be confined by societal limitations. She directly confronted the barriers she encountered, challenging the status quo and demanding equal representation and recognition. Her defiant language and refusal to back down in the face of adversity empowered marginalized groups, inspiring future generations of leaders to break down barriers and pursue their aspirations.

Conclusion:

Shirley Chisholm's bid for the presidency remains a testament to the power of rhetoric in challenging existing norms and effecting social change. Through her skillful use of ethos, logos, and pathos, Chisholm established herself as a credible, policy-oriented candidate while forging emotional connections with voters. Her campaign broke barriers and shattered glass ceilings, inspiring marginalized communities and leaving a lasting impact on American politics. Chisholm's legacy serves as a reminder that rhetoric, when wielded effectively, has the potential to transform

The phrase that best accomplishes the following paragraph to give it an objective character is "played his heart out."

a set of words that make up a portion of a sentence rather than the entire text. Examples. a phrase with an adjectival ending. An illustration of the double negative is the phrase "something not unfamiliar circumstance."

By providing specific information about one or both of the components of speech being used, grammatical phrases help sentences make sense. Any section of speech can be clarified by a grammatical phrase, but the point is that a phrase only provides information; it lacks the structural components of a clause.

To know more about phrase visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16012068

#SPJ1

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer: As a child she worshipEd her parents and believed they had the best intentions, but she slowly loosed faith in them, , Jeannette spares their feelings by picking up the slack herself, getting a job and managing finances, leading into audulthood.

Explanation:

Jeannette ties the story of her coming of age to her complicated feelings for her parents, showing her growth through their evolving relationship. As she begins to lose faith in them. She doesn’t truly give up on them until her Dad whips her for actively calling Mom and Dad out on their negligence. From here on, she stops trying to save her family unit and works to save herself and her siblings. During her college years in New York, her hero worship of her parents transforms into anger and shame, both toward them and herself. She enacts this shame by marrying Eric. Jeannette’s anger has subsided into acceptance. Her choice to marry John, who admires her scars, demonstrates that she can now appreciate the difficulties she went through.

Answer:

globalization and communication

Explanation:

globalization -

1. Free Trade

2. Liberalization

3. Connectivity

4. Economic globalization

5. Cultural globalization

6. Political globaliation

7. Opportunity

8. Learning

9. Production advantage

communication

(1) Two or More Persons:

(2) Exchange of Ideas:

(3) Mutual Understanding:

(4) Direct and Indirect Communication:

(5) Continuous Process:

(6) Use of Words as well as Symbols:

7 Cs: clear, concise, concrete, correct, coherent, complete and courteous

Answer:

world safest  places to leave

Explanation:

can't  explain