Smithville Hospital's legal counsel must complete an e-discovery information process in order to get ready for a lawsuit against the facility.
E-discovery is a type of digital investigation that looks for information that might be relevant to a legal dispute or criminal investigation in email, corporate communications, and other data. While e-discovery is specialized to digital evidence, the traditional discovery procedure is standard during litigation. Data from email accounts, instant messages, social media profiles, online documents, databases, internal applications, digital images, website content, and any other electronic information that could be used in civil and criminal litigation could be included in the evidence from electronic discovery. E-discovery is a procedure with various stages and techniques, much like any other type of research. There is no one methodology that works for everyone. The majority of e-discovery legal firms conduct their own investigations. But there are a few standard stages in most procedures. These e-discovery phases were developed to enhance the gathering, preservation, and presentation of information that may be pertinent.
To learn more about e-discovery information please click on the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/28198296
#SPJ4
E=mc cubed, true or false?
Answer: false
Explanation:
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
I think but I'm not sure
How is a student loan different from a scholarship? A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back. A scholarship must be paid back, but a student loan is not paid back. A student loan is a form of financial aid, but a scholarship is not. A scholarship is a form of financial aid, but a student loan is not.
Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Student Loan and scholarshipStudent loan can be defined as borrowing or lending money to cover your school expenses while scholarship is a financial aid or financial assistance to cover your school expenses.
When you borrowed money you are expected to payback but when it comes to scholarship you are not expected to pay back because the money given to you was free.
Inconclusion Student loan different from a scholarship because: A student loan must be paid back, but a scholarship is not paid back.
Learn more about Student Loan and scholarship here:https://brainly.com/question/488893
What does the proverb, "Motse go swa mabapi" mean? a. People help each other. O b. Harmony in love. O c. Together we stand, divided we fall.
Answer:
The answer is a.
People help each other.
I hope this is helpful!
In Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that: O a. Section 33.1 of the Criminal Code should be declared unconstitutional and of no force or effect pursuant to s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. O b. S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 12 of the Charter. O c. S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 11(d) of the Charter but that the infringements were justified under s. 1 of the Charter. O d. The judgement of the Court of Appeal should be upheld.
The Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. Brown, 2022 SCC 18 concluded that S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 12 of the Charter. However, the infringements were justified under s. 1 of the Charter. Therefore, option C is correct.
Section 33.1 of the Criminal CodeThe "not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder" (NCRMD) provision, also known as section 16 of the Criminal Code, has been the topic of much controversy over the years. In its 1999 decision in R. v. Swain, the Supreme Court of Canada declared section 16 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional, and
Parliament subsequently re-enacted the provision, along with a new provision, section 33.1, in 2005.Section 33.1 of the Criminal Code provides a mechanism for detention, examination, and release from detention for people found NCRMD, as well as for those found unfit to stand trial.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that S. 33.1 of the Criminal Code infringed ss. 7 and 12 of the Charter but that the infringements were justified under s. 1 of the Charter.
Learn more about Criminal Code visit : brainly.com/question/32420090
#SPJ11
Which of the following crime victims would not be included in the sample of individuals surveyed for the NCVS?a. A 10-year old boy who was beaten up and whose bicycle was stolenb. A 14-year-old girl who was sexually assaulted by a neighborc. A 20-year-old college student whose car was stolend. A 75-year-old man whose computer was stolen during a home burglary
Option A: A 10-year-old boy who was beaten up and whose bicycle was stolen, would not be included in the sample of individuals surveyed for the NCVS.
The main source of data on criminal victimisation in the country is the BJS National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The NCVS gathers data on household property crimes (such as burglary/trespassing, motor vehicle theft, and other types of theft) as well as nonfatal personal crimes (such as sexual assault, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and personal larceny). Thus, it does not include a child victim who was beaten up. Option A is the right choice.
Each time a victimization incident occurs, the NCVS gathers data on the offender (such as age, race, and Hispanic origin, gender, and victim-offender relationship), the crime's specifics (such as the time and location, the use of weapons, the type of injury sustained, and the economic consequences), whether or not the crime was reported to the police, the reasons for this, and the victim's experiences with the criminal justice system.
To know more about criminal victimization, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/28205789
#SPJ4
concerns about the extent to which personal privacy has been and may be compromised have led to a variety of legal and technical approaches to reinforcing privacy rights. (True or False)
The rise of technology and the internet has made personal privacy a major concern for individuals, organizations, and governments. With the increasing amount of personal data that is collected and stored by various entities, concerns about privacy breaches and the misuse of personal data have become more pronounced. The statement is True.
As a result, there have been various legal and technical approaches to reinforce privacy rights. On the legal front, there have been laws enacted to protect privacy rights, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union, which regulates the processing of personal data of individuals within the EU. In the United States, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) are examples of legislation aimed at protecting personal data and privacy rights.
On the technical front, there are various tools and technologies that individuals and organizations can use to enhance their privacy and security. These include encryption technologies, anonymization tools, and virtual private networks (VPNs) that can help protect personal data from unauthorized access and surveillance.
In conclusion, concerns about personal privacy have led to various legal and technical approaches aimed at reinforcing privacy rights. These approaches are necessary to ensure that individuals can exercise their right to privacy and protect their personal data from unauthorized access and misuse.
To know more about Personal Privacy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30464456
#SPJ11
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
!! IT IS NOT D. FRONTAGE ROADS !!
2. Which of the following is NOT considered an appropriate removal location?
A. Mainlines
B. Medians
C. Shoulders
D. Frontage roads
Answer:
I think it should be a mainlines
Explanation:
because they're the mainlines...
Assume Plaintiff (P) is a Georgia resident. While driving through Birmingham, Alabama, P is involved in an accident with D, an Alabama resident. P alleges more than $75,000 in personal and property injuries. Does a federal court in Georgia have subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute based on the diversity of citizenship of the parties
Answer:
75,000
Explanation:
i belive this correct
In summary, how does lobbying work? (This should be a long answer.)
Answer:
In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation is the act of lawfully attempting to influence the actions, policies, or decisions of government officials, most often legislators or members of regulatory agencies.
Explanation:
What is cis gender?
denoting or relating to a person whose sense of personal identity and gender corresponds with their birth sex.
20 points
What does Goodman mean by the phrase, “If you control the code, you control the world”? Describe an example of what Goodman means.
What Marc Goodman means by the phrase “If you control the code, you control the world" is that anyone who gained insight into how things are created at their source will have tremendous influence.
Who is Marc Goodman?Marc Goodman is a global strategist, a consultant and a New York Times best-selling author.
His work revolves around technology, security, business, and international affairs.
One example of that the quote above means is that if for instance one learns how to control the DNA, they would be very powerful.
Learn more about Marc Goodman at:
https://brainly.com/question/2219135
1. What were the Articles of Confederation?civics
Confederation stated regarding the thirteen colonies that were present and all were to be joined together with equal rights.
What are the Articles of Confederation?The Articles established a federal union of independent states with a meager central administration that delegated most authority to the state legislatures.
The thirteen colonies were aware that they required some kind of formal authority to bring them all together. They desired codified regulations that were accepted by all the regions. The Articles granted Congress the authority to establish a militia, pass laws, and generate money, among other responsibilities.
Learn more about the Articles of Confederation, Here:
brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ1
a(n) ________ occurs when there is a transfer of both rights and duties under a contract.
A novation occurs when there is a transfer of both rights and duties under a contract.
This happens when a new party replaces one of the original parties to the contract. The new party assumes both the rights and obligations of the departing party, and the departing party is released from any further obligations under the contract.
Novation is often used in situations where one party to a contract wants to be released from their obligations and a new party is willing to assume those obligations.
This can be useful in situations where the original party is unable to fulfill their obligations, or where a new party can bring added value to the contract.
To know more about contract, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/984979#
#SPJ11
Please answer all of theses Will give brainly if correct
Answer:
one's dysfunctional(D) and the other is functional(F). just kidding!
D is an "out of hand" fight where both members are yelling. F is a controlled fight that both members of the conflict are both calm and are both calmly discussing solutions to the conflict.
Explanation:
help if u can
200/200
yea yea yea
Answer:
1
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is 1.
Explanation:
200/200
=1
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law:____.a. is only a state misdemeanor b. is always a federal crime c. results in prison penalties up to 20 years d. results in a maximum fine of $300,000
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law - results in a maximum fine of $300,000
The unauthorized seizure of another person's property with the purpose to permanently rob them of it is considered theft in law. This might include real assets like cash or personal property as well as intangible assets like trade secrets or private data. Depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the incident, theft is a serious felony that may be punished with fines or imprisonment.
The maximum sentence for identity theft in federal court is 15 years in federal prison, but identity theft cases sometimes also involve other counts that might lengthen the prison term.
For such more question on theft:
brainly.com/question/30293258
#SPJ4
Which right is protected by the Fifth Amendment?
to bear arms
to trial by jury
against cruel and unusual punishment
against self-incrimination
Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury,
In American courts judges are advocates for the prosecution.
True
False
Answer:
This is false
The president has more power over ____________ than other areas.
A. trade
B. social welfare
C. foreign policy
D education
Answer:
Foreign Policy.
The president has more power over foreign policy than other areas.
I hope this helped at all.Answer:
C IS THE ANSWER
I HOPE IT IS HELPFUL
What motive does an interest group have to file an amicus curiae brief?
A. to file a lawsuit that will automatically originate in a higher court
B. to influence a court’s interpretation of law to a litigant’s benefit
C. to try to reverse the outcome of a previous Supreme Court case
D. to appeal legislation that it sees as harmful to its interests
The motive an interest group has to file an amicus curiae brief is to influence a court's interpretation of the law to a litigant's benefit. Therefore, the correct option is B.
The interest group's brief may help a court to better understand the issues, the potential impact of the court's ruling, and the potential consequences of the ruling for individuals or organizations not party to the case.
In detail, an amicus curiae is a "friend of the court" brief filed by an individual or entity who is not a party to the case but has an interest in the outcome. Interest groups are frequently the entities that file amicus briefs, and they do so to offer a perspective that may not be represented by the parties themselves.
In a legal case, the interest group files an amicus brief to support a particular outcome that aligns with the group's interests. The brief's content and argument must be relevant to the case, as the interest group is not allowed to advocate for issues outside of the case's scope.
The goal of an amicus curiae brief is to assist a court in making a decision by providing information or legal analysis. This information can be useful to a court, particularly in cases with far-reaching implications that may affect entities or individuals not a party to the case.
Know more about the an amicus curiae brief click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15520019
#SPJ11
A common law jurisdiction defines first-degree murder as any murder that is (1) committed by means of poison or (2) premeditated. All other murder is second-degree murder, and manslaughter is defined as at common law.
An employee was angry with her boss for denying her a raise. Intending to cause her boss discomfort, the employee secretly dropped into his coffee three over-the-counter laxative pills. The boss drank the coffee containing the pills. Although the pills would not have been dangerous to an ordinary person, because the boss was already taking other medication, he suffered a seizure and died.
If the employee is charged with murder in the 1st degree, should she be convicted?
The specific laws and statutes of the jurisdiction where the crime was committed. In the scenario you presented, the employee intentionally put laxative pills in her boss's coffee, which caused his death. However, the pills would not have been dangerous to an ordinary person, and it was the boss's pre-existing medical condition that caused his death.
In a common law jurisdiction, first-degree murder is defined as any murder that is committed by means of poison or premeditated. In this case, the employee used poison to harm her boss, so it could potentially be considered first-degree murder. However, the intent to cause discomfort and not death could be argued as a lack of premeditation, which would classify the crime as second-degree murder.
Ultimately, it would be up to the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the employee intended to cause the death of her boss, which could be difficult to do in this case. The defence could argue that the employee did not have the intention of causing her boss's death and did not anticipate the lethal outcome. Therefore, whether the employee should be convicted of first-degree murder would depend on the specific facts of the case, the laws of the jurisdiction, and the arguments presented by both the prosecution and defence.
To know more about Medical Conditions visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30792120
#SPJ11
How does the structure and operations of Congress reflect the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives?
The structure and operations of Congress are designed to reflect the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives. This means that the legislative branch is responsible for creating laws that govern the nation, while the executive branch is responsible for carrying out those laws. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the law and ensuring that it is applied fairly and evenly.
Congress is made up of two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each state has a certain number of representatives based on its population, while each senator represents an entire state. Representatives are elected to two-year terms, while senators are elected to six-year terms. This staggered election cycle ensures that one chamber is always up for reelection, providing voters with a constant opportunity to hold their representatives accountable.The Constitution grants Congress a number of specific powers, including the power to tax, borrow money, declare war, and regulate interstate commerce. In addition, Congress has the power to pass any law necessary and proper for carrying out its other constitutional powers. This expansive view of congressional authority was affirmed by the Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), which held that Congress has implied powers in addition to its express powers. The structure of Congress thus reflects the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives. The separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches ensures that no one branch becomes too powerful, while the staggered election cycles provide voters with a way to hold their representatives accountable.
Learn more about Congress here
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ4
Drag each tile to the correct box.
what is the Sequence in forensic history events in chronological order.
Answer:
We need to see the tiles
Explanation:
If not we dont know what it looks like or how to help you
Answer:
pic
Explanation:
i cant answer without a pic
Explain and discuss in relation to the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors 2019 and the ethical dilemmas faced by solicitors.
Answer:
The Code of Conduct describes the standards of professionalism that we, the SRA, and the public expect of individuals (solicitors, registered European lawyers and registered foreign lawyers) authorised by us to provide legal services.
Explanation:
WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS AFTER A COMMITEE HAS REPORTED A MEASURE TO THE SENATE
Answer:
A congressional debate takes place and members vote on the measure.
20 points !! please help
Compare and contrast the U.S. Presidency and Congress with the Michigan governorship and state legislature in terms of membership, terms, term limits, and powers under the Constitution.
Which of the following would NOT be considered a civic responsibility?
A.
voting
B.
serving on a committee
C.
obeying the law
D.
volunteering
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
C. Obeying the law
Explanation:
A civic responsibility is something you should do to be a good citizen, meaning you should do them but you don't have to. Obeying the law on a other hand, is something you HAVE to do or you get punished. Hope this helps!
explain what non-violent direct action is and why it can be so successful.
Answer:
Nonviolent direct action may include sit-ins, strikes, street blockades, sabotage, and counter-economics. Violent direct action may include political violence, assault, arson and property destruction.
Explanation:
Answer:
Martin Luther King Jr.'s decision to utilize nonviolence was based on religious principles. In fact, King discovered the use of nonviolent action as a political tool through learning about Gandhi's success in India.
King's approach was specifically Christian in orientation, drawing on his own status as a minister and the centrality of the Church in the lives of the Montgomery, Alabama, African-Americans who were the first protestors he led. His speeches utilized the inspirational crescendo structure of African-American sermonizing and he typically used biblical themes in them. This provided a deeper source of unity than the specific issue at hand and his able lieutenants were drawn from the rolls of black preachers.
King's methods were "step-wise." The King Center lists six:
Step One. Information gathering
Step Two. Education
Step Three. Personal commitment
Step Four. Negotiations
Step Five. Direct action
Step Six. Reconciliation
Creating opportunities for resolution without confrontation and ensuring that both proponents and adversaries have sufficiently accurate information to make decisions both about the issue and the process.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Cathy was incarcerated because she has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren. She has been held in custody for an extended period after her incarceration term ended because she has the possibility of becoming violent, which is also known as:
Answer:
Preventative detention
Explanation:
Preventative detention is a form of incarceration that is given when the detained party is thought of as harmful to the society.
They are detained to prevent further acts of violence or crime in the community.in which they live.
In the given scenario Cathy has a history of physical and mental abuse of her stepchildren.
Releasing her will most likely lead to further abuse on the step children.
This was done to prevent further acts of violence from her.
the statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is typically set by individual provinces or territories within their respective legal frameworks.
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges varies depending on the specific charge and the province in which it is being laid. Generally, the limitations range from one to five years, but some charges may have longer limitations or none at all. For example, in Ontario, the limitation period for most provincial offences is one year from the time the offence was committed, while in British Columbia, the limitation period is generally two years. However, some charges, such as sexual assault and murder, have no limitation period and can be laid at any time. It is important to note that the statute of limitations does not apply to all offences, and some charges may be laid even after the limitation period has expired if certain conditions are met.
To know more about provincial visit:
brainly.com/question/31273238
#SPJ11