Along with the Chairman Chiefs of Staff Committee, the commander in chief, on the suggestion of the Minister of Defense, appoints the heads of each branch of the armed forces.
What is a chief?Chiefs are typically the head of a tribe or clan. The president is occasionally referred to as our "commander in chief." A chief is the top dog, the big cheese, or the head honcho. Chiefs rule tribes, but they also oversee firefighters, police officers, and businesses (Chief Executive Officer or CEO). The person with the most power; the head or leader of a group of people. the police commissioner. a tribe's or clan's leader or chief. a tribal chief.
Why is it called chief?The word chief is derived from the French word chef, which itself is derived from the Latin word caput, both of which designate the leader of a group. Chief was a title that European settlers used to refer to the leaders of the Indigenous peoples they encountered during the colonization of North America.
To know more about Chief visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22217349
#SPJ4
In 2001 12-year-old Lionel Tate who was try doesn't adult was convicted of killing a six-year-old girl by practicing wrestling moves on her he was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole if the same crime occurred today would Lionel have been sentenced to death instead
No, even if the same crime had happened today he could not be sentenced to death if he was 12 years old.
Lionel Alexander Tate is the youngest American citizen ever sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, though this sentence was eventually overturned. In January 2001, when Tate was 12, he was convicted of first-degree murder for the 1999 battering death of six-year-old Tiffany Eunick.
The reason being, Lionel was not of competent age and he was tried as an adult as it was an exceptional case. Therefore, he could not be given death sentence even today as the judge at that time also took harshest of measures to treat him as an adult for a murder trial.
To know more about Murder Trial:
brainly.com/question/28289356
#SPJ1
The formal amendment process outlined in the Constitution can begin in different places. Select all of the following places where the formal amendment process can begin.
Question options:
A. House of Representatives
B. President of the United States
C. Senate
D. states
E. Vice President
F. Executive Department of Amendments
C. National Archives
Answer:
A. House of Representatives
C. Senate
Explanation:
The Constitution of the United States of America can be amended because the Founding Fathers believed that there might be reason to in order to ensure that the rights and welfare of all Americans are looked after.
Recognizing the impact a Constitutional amendment could make however, they made the process a bit difficult to ensure that the amendment has enough support.
There are two ways to propose an amendment. The first is through Congress where two-thirds of both Houses of Congress would have to vote in favor of the amendment for it to proceed.
The Second is when two-thirds of States ask Congress to form a National Convention which will then Nominate Amendments.
In the first method, the process of Amendment can begin either in the Senate or the House of Representatives because it will still need a two-thirds vote in either.
Are police officers allowed too much discretion? Why is discretion a necessary element of policing?Or is it?
Subchapter S corporations have almost no restrictions and are easily formed and operated.
True/False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Answer: false
Explanation:
Under what conditions if any should officers direct the occupants of a target vehicle involved in a high risk pullover to exit their vehicle
Officers should direct the occupants of a target vehicle involved in a high risk pullover to exit the vehicle when they have reasonable suspicion that the occupants pose a threat to their safety.
This could include if the occupants are suspected of a violent crime, have a weapon in the vehicle, or have made threatening gestures or statements. Officers should also take into account the environment, such as the time of day and amount of traffic in the area.
Additionally, officers should use discretion when deciding whether to direct occupants to exit the vehicle, as well as whether to use verbal commands or hand signals to do so.
To know more about vehicle , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13390217
#SPJ4
The question -
Under what conditions can any officers direct the occupants of a target vehicle involved in a high risk pullover to exit their vehicle?
John filed a petition for declaration of nullity of his marriage to Anne on the ground of psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code. He obtained a copy of the confidential psychiatric evaluation report on his wife from the secretary of the psychiatrist. Can he testify on the said report without offending the rule on privileged communication
John cannot testify on the confidential psychiatric evaluation report of his wife without offending the rule on privileged communication.
Privileged communication protects certain confidential information disclosed during professional relationships, such as those between a psychiatrist and a patient. The purpose of this privilege is to encourage open communication and trust between individuals seeking professional help. The confidential psychiatric evaluation report falls under this privileged communication, and unless the privilege is waived or a court orders its disclosure, John cannot testify about the report without violating the rule.
Learn more about privileged communication here:
https://brainly.com/question/31937232
#SPJ11
stopping mail services and locking all windows and doors are typical items on a
Answer: very expensive store
Explanation:
introduction to the fiber analysis webquest activity find 5 examples of each type of fiber and give a brief
Law enforcement organizations all across the world employ fiber analysis, a technique for locating and studying fibers, to gather evidence during an investigation.
Law enforcement organizations also utilize fiber analysis to pinpoint suspects around the crime site. When a suspect or victim is in close proximity to one another, fibers can transfer. Fiber transfers can also happen during break-ins when the intruder's fibers get entangled. Since fiber evidence is a sort of trace evidence, it will probably be very minute, maybe even microscopic. Due of its lower reliability than DNA, this technology is typically not utilized to actually identify a criminal in an inquiry.
Three basic methods for fiber examination include UV-Vis MSP, polarized light microscopy, and FTIR. Different kinds of microscopes RTF-are used in WE-R polarized light microscopy and UV-V is MSP to examine samples.
For such more question on fiber .
https://brainly.com/question/24823406
#SPJ4
A request by a defendant for the court to discharge a plaintiff's case as it does not have enough evidence to constitute a violation of law is known as
The request made by a defendant to the court to dismiss a plaintiff's case due to insufficient evidence is known as a motion for summary judgment.
Essentially, the defendant is arguing that even if all the evidence presented by the plaintiff were true, it would not be enough to show that the defendant violated the law and therefore the case should be dismissed.
In order to succeed on a motion for summary judgment, the defendant must demonstrate that there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This means that the defendant must show that the evidence presented by the plaintiff is either insufficient or legally insufficient to support their claim.
To make a motion for summary judgment, the defendant typically files a written motion with the court and provides supporting documentation, such as affidavits or other evidence. The plaintiff then has an opportunity to respond, typically by submitting their own affidavits or other evidence to rebut the defendant's arguments.
If the court agrees with the defendant, it will grant the motion for summary judgment and dismiss the plaintiff's case. If the court disagrees, it will deny the motion and allow the case to proceed to trial where a jury or judge will ultimately decide the outcome based on the merits of the evidence presented at trial.
learn more about summary judgment here
https://brainly.com/question/26330155
#SPJ11
Most people in the developing world use which of the following resources for fuel
Answer:
theres no options?
Explanation:
Consider the effects of making the European Union’s privacy standards federal law here in the United States. What groups would support a movement to do so? What groups would oppose the move? What would be the effects on business?
The interest groups would support movement to making European Union’s privacy standards federal law in United States.
What is federal law?The body of laws that nation's federal government has produced is known as federal law. A federal government is created when a collection of political entities, such as states or provinces, joins forces to establish a federation, ceding much of their individual sovereignty and power to the federal government while keeping or reserving other, more restricted authorities. A defined geographic territory as a result has two or more levels of governance. Federal law is the governing body of the common central government. Federalism in the United States was fundamentally altered by this, which established the superior connection between federal laws and conflicting State laws. The United States Code contains a list of federal statutes.
To learn more about federal law, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26371147
#SPJ1
Officers usually record information on how the evidence was handled on the
evidence bags
search warrant
court order
intake form
How does the TSA enforce security regulations on
airports? Are there any limits to this enforcement and what are the
penalties for non-compliance?
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) enforces security regulations at airports in the United States through a combination of measures aimed at protecting passengers, baggage, and aircraft.
The TSA's enforcement of security regulations primarily involves the following aspects:
Screening Procedures: The TSA conducts passenger and baggage screening using various technologies such as X-ray scanners, metal detectors, and explosive detection systems. These procedures help identify prohibited items and potential security threats.
Security Checkpoints: TSA officers stationed at security checkpoints ensure compliance with security protocols by conducting thorough inspections of passengers and their belongings. This includes checking identification, verifying boarding passes, and screening individuals for prohibited items.
Security Equipment and Training: The TSA deploys advanced security equipment and provides specialized training to its officers to enhance their ability to detect and respond to security threats effectively. This includes training in threat recognition, behavior detection, and response protocols.
Security Measures: The TSA implements additional security measures, such as random passenger screening, enhanced pat-downs, and canine teams, to deter and detect potential threats.
While the TSA has broad authority to enforce security regulations, there are certain limits to its enforcement powers. The agency must operate within the confines of applicable laws, regulations, and constitutional protections, including respecting passengers' rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.In terms of penalties for non-compliance with TSA security regulations, they can vary depending on the specific violation. The TSA has the authority to issue civil penalties, which can range from fines to legal actions. For example, individuals who attempt to bring prohibited items through security checkpoints may face fines, denied boarding, or even criminal charges in severe cases. Additionally, the TSA may implement measures such as increased screening or additional security procedures for non-compliant individuals or airports.It's important to note that compliance with TSA security regulations is a critical aspect of maintaining aviation security and ensuring the safety of passengers and crew. Airlines, airport operators, and individuals are expected to cooperate with the TSA's security measures to maintain a secure and efficient air travel environment.
To know more about civil penalties, click here https://brainly.com/question/32396562
#SPJ11
HELP! ILL NAME YOU AS BRAINLIEST!!!!
Using this graph and your knowledge of U.S. government, which statement is MOST correct?
A)
People are more dissatisfied with their Senator than their Representative.
B)
The downward opinion of incumbent has not usually been echoed in the
voting booth.
C)The downward trend for incumbents reflects the movement caused by the
Trump campaign.
D)
Political Action Committees are losing the influence over the electoral
process they enjoyed.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it is B ....
According to the reading, what were the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche? Check all that apply. to promote the Christian religion to celebrate the holiday to encourage the celebration of Christmas to show how the holiday started to act as a place for prayer
Answer:
to celebrate the holiday
to show how the holiday started
Explanation:
This is the reading
The narrow question is whether there is a secular purpose for Pawtucket's display of the crèche. The display is sponsored by the city to celebrate the Holiday and to depict the origins of that Holiday. These are legitimate secular purposes.
—Chief Justice Warren Burger,
Opinion of the Court,
Lynch v. Donnelly
1984
From this reading it can be inferred that the city's secular purposes for displaying the crèche was to show how the holiday started and also to to celebrate the holiday.
Answer:
To celebrate the holiday
To show how the holiday started
Explanation:
Briefly define the term "assembly line justice" in your own words.
Lower court matters are very quick to deal with, frequently without appropriate respect for the consequences of such victims, which is considered as Assembly line justice.
Considering an assembly line would be aimed at completing a producing object as soon as well as effectively as practicable, it is aimed at producing a closed down container.It doesn't expensive as well as take several weeks as "genuine" justice could, seems to be the sole actual advantage of assembly-line law.
Learn more about assembly-line justice here:
https://brainly.com/question/11731368
What among the three elementsof etiology of criminal acts is the most significant for a crime not to happen?
Among the three elements of etiology of criminal acts, the most significant factor for a crime not to happen is opportunity.
The opportunity for a crime to occur refers to the conditions and circumstances that make it possible for an individual to engage in criminal behavior. If the opportunity is effectively minimized or eliminated, the likelihood of a crime taking place is greatly reduced.
While individual predisposition and motive are also important factors in understanding criminal behavior, they may not always result in the actual commission of a crime if the opportunity is absent or significantly limited. By focusing on reducing opportunities for criminal acts, societies can implement preventive measures to deter potential offenders and create a safer environment.
Efforts to prevent crime through situational crime prevention, environmental design, and targeted interventions aim to eliminate or minimize the opportunities for criminal behavior. Examples include lling security systems, implementing community policing strategies, improving street lighting, and promoting neighborhood watch programs. These measures make it more difficult or less appealing for individuals to engage in criminal acts.
Overall, while individual predisposition and motive play a role in criminal behavior, the most significant factor for preventing crimes from happening is effectively controlling and reducing the opportunities for such acts to occur.
Learn more about criminal acts here:
https://brainly.com/question/28430888
#SPJ11
'Victimhood is not an objective assessment of harm
caused to an individual or group. It is a socially
constructed concept which reflects a particular view of
the world'. Critically discuss this statement within the
context of the post-9/11 War on Terror.
Answer:
This concept is used by European countries.
Explanation:
The concept of Victimhood adopted by the European countries especially United States of America to invade Afghanistan and control the Asian region. The 9/11 incident is caused by the America itself to get a sympathy vote and a reason just like the incident of pearl harbor to invade Afghanistan to control the region. The main aim of these European countries to control the spreading of communism and not to control the terrorist so this Victimhood helps many countries to get their goals.
Read the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
Sykes and Matze called these circumstances techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally clean or neutralize their crimes and strain themselves into that they aren't really criminals.
What are techniques?Skill is the ability to carry out a task with discovered results. The knowledge base technique is any systematic way of acquiring information about a scientific nature. Ability to treat such details or use such social movement, and good piano skillfulness.
Sykes and Matze’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur justifications techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally
Therefore, Sykes and Matze called these justifications techniques of neutralization
Learn more about techniques here:
https://brainly.com/question/17130704
#SPJ1
____________ protects law enforcement agents from being sued for damages unless they violate clearly established law which a reasonable official in the agent's position would have known.
Answer:
qualified immunity is the correct answer!!
Explanation:
Some law enforcement professionals believe relying on scientific evidence makes it more
difficult to convict criminals when the scientific evidence is not available. In your opinion,
does the reliance on scientific evidence help or hamper law enforcement?
Lawyers fees that give the lawyer a percentage of the amount awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff wins, and nothing if the plaintiff loses, are ________________fees.
a. Compensatory
b. Contingent
c. Exemplary
d. Per Diem
Lawyers fees that give the lawyer a percentage of the amount awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff wins, and nothing if the plaintiff loses, are Contingent fees. The correct option is b.
Lawyers are professionals who are trained and licensed to practice law, advise and represent legal clients in matters that range from civil litigation to legal transactions. Lawyers work in legal settings like law firms, private corporations, and government agencies.Lawyers' responsibilities include advocating for clients, interpreting laws and regulations, researching case law, drafting legal documents, and facilitating negotiations between parties. To become a lawyer, an individual must first obtain a law degree and pass the bar exam in the state where they plan to practice. Law is a discipline that deals with human behavior, crime, and legal power.Plaintiff fees are costs that are directly tied to litigation, and these costs must be borne by the plaintiff in most legal systems. These costs can be recovered from the defendant if the plaintiff wins the case or if the defendant settles, but if the plaintiff loses, the plaintiff will be held liable for all costs incurred. A plaintiff's costs will be calculated according to the nature of the case and the steps taken in the course of the legal process. These fees include things like the cost of filing a complaint, deposition costs, expert witness costs, and other related costs.Lawyers fees that give the lawyer a percentage of the amount awarded to the plaintiff if the plaintiff wins, and nothing if the plaintiff loses, are Contingent fees. In a contingent fee arrangement, the attorney agrees to receive a percentage of the client's recovery as payment. The attorney does not get paid until the client receives payment, either through a settlement or a court decision. The contingency fee percentage can range from 10% to 40%, depending on the type of case and the risks involved.Therefore, the correct option is 'b' Contingent.Learn more about Plaintiff: https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ11
is/are NOT a recommended means of communicating with other users of the roadway. A) Lights and signals. B) Angry gestures. C) The horn. D) Eye contact.
the goal of president obama’s stimulus package and increased government spending following the deep economic downturn in 2008 and 2009 was to reduce inflation. (T/F)
The given statement " the goal of president obama’s stimulus package and increased government spending following the deep economic downturn in 2008 and 2009 was to reduce inflation." is False.
The goal of President Obama's stimulus package and increased government spending following the deep economic downturn in 2008 and 2009 was not to reduce inflation. Instead, it was aimed at stimulating economic growth, creating jobs, and preventing a further economic downturn.
At the time, the United States was experiencing a severe recession, and the government implemented various measures to try to stimulate the economy and promote growth. These measures included increased government spending on infrastructure projects, tax cuts for individuals and businesses, and other measures aimed at boosting consumer spending and business investment.
Reducing inflation was not a primary goal of these policies, although the government likely hoped that increased economic growth would help to stabilize prices and prevent inflation from rising too rapidly.
To know more about inflation here
https://brainly.com/question/30112292
#SPJ4
What is meant by gateway substances? What is one example of a gateway substance? What is wrong with assuming that using a gateway substance causes an increased use of other substances?
A gateway substance is an innocuous substance (alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana) that leads to cocaine/meth use/dependence.
Most individuals who take "gateway" drugs don't get hooked to cocaine/heroin/meth. Instead than "gateway drugs" causing subsequent drug use, they should be seen as an early signal of deviant behavior caused by other risk factors.
This is further explained below.
What is meant by gateway substances?Generally, A gateway substance is a substance that, on its own, is relatively safe (such as alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana), but that will ultimately lead to the use of stronger drugs, such as cocaine or methamphetamine, and even reliance on those harder substances.
The assumption that the use of gateway substances causes increased use in other substances is problematic for a number of reasons, the most significant of which is that the vast majority of people who do use these so-called "gateway substances" do not go on to become addicted to cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine.
In conclusion, Instead of seeing "gateway drugs" as the causes of eventual drug use, we should view them as early indicators of fundamentally antisocial conduct that is the outcome of other risk factors.
Read more about gateway substances
https://brainly.com/question/5546599
#SPJ1
Which kind of judicial decision-making acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent?answer choices- Judicial restraint- Judicial activism- Judicial constitutionality- Judicial majority
Judicial activism, a style of legal decision-making, acknowledges the capacity of judges to create new social policy through the rejection of precedent.
According to the legal theory of "judicial activism," courts can and must consider societal effects in addition to the law that applies when making decisions. It is occasionally used in defiance of court restraint. The phrase typically refers to a judge deviating from precedent and relying more heavily on their own convictions while rendering decisions. Politicians disagree on both the overall concept of judicial activism and specific activist judgements. The issues of statutory interpretation, judicial activism, and the separation of powers are closely intertwined. Additionally, this idea is the reverse of judicial activism, in which judges decide matters based on their own opinions rather than the law and precedents. Consequently, judicial restraint indicates that a judge will take precedents into account when deciding on a case.
Learn more about Judicial activism here:
https://brainly.com/question/29972861
#SPJ4
Which of the following economic systems leaves production decisions
completely up to the producers?
O A. Command economy
O B. Planned economy
оооо
C. Mixed economy
O D. Free-market economy
\(\mathfrak{\huge{\pink{\underline{\underline{AnSwEr:-}}}}}\)
Actually Welcome to the Concept of the Economics.
A free-market system is an economic system in which the market decides the prices of goods and services through supply (producers) and demand (consumers) with little or no government intervention or control. .
Thus the Answer is D. Free-Market Economy.
IT'S BEST NOT TO DRIVE IN THE FOG, BUT IF YOU MUST, YOU SHOULD USE:
A. Low-beam lights
B. High-beam lights
C. Fog lights only
High beams
Explanation:
High beam headlights give off a bright glow that goes as far as 350-400 feet in front .
Answer: you should use low beam headlights as well as fog lights if your vehicle has them so I guess it would be low beam lights
Explanation:
Why do you think a "reliable, scholarly
Source is always stressed in academic
writing?
It is very common for attorneys to file complaints against judges that the attorneys feel had engaged in misconduct.