what do mayor ivan allen and senator richard russell have in common?

Answer:The Union had the advantage of a larger population, superior industrial and transportation capabilities, and a strong navy, while the Confederacy had the advantage of fighting on their home territory and having more experienced military leaders. These strengths and weaknesses ultimately contributed to the Union's victory, as their superior resources allowed them to outlast and overcome the Confederacy's initial advantages.

Explanation:

The Union had more people and better resources for war, such as factories and ships, while the Confederacy had experienced military leaders and was fighting on their own land. However, the Union's advantages in resources allowed them to ultimately win the war despite the Confederacy's initial strengths.

Answer:

The American Civil War was a complex conflict that lasted from 1861 to 1865. Both the Union and the Confederacy had their strengths and weaknesses, which played a crucial role in determining the outcome of the war. Here are some of the key strengths and weaknesses of each side and how they contributed to the war's outcome:

Union:

Strengths:

Industrial and economic power: The Union had a more robust and more diversified economy than the Confederacy. It had more significant manufacturing capabilities, better transportation infrastructure, and more extensive financial resources, giving it a significant advantage in the war.

Population and manpower: The Union had a population of 22 million, compared to the Confederacy's nine million. This meant that the Union had a more extensive pool of potential soldiers and could quickly replace losses on the battlefield.

Navy: The Union had a more substantial navy, which enabled it to control the seas and blockade Confederate ports. This prevented the Confederacy from exporting its cotton and importing weapons and other supplies.

Weaknesses:

Military leadership: The Union struggled to find competent military leaders at the beginning of the war. It took some time for General Ulysses S. Grant to emerge as a capable and successful leader.

Fighting on unfamiliar terrain: The Union army had to fight on unfamiliar terrain in the South, which was difficult for soldiers who were used to fighting in the North.

Confederacy:

Strengths:

Military leadership: The Confederacy had some of the best military leaders of the time, including Generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.

Fighting on familiar terrain: Confederate soldiers were familiar with the terrain of the South, which gave them an advantage over Union soldiers.

Motivation and commitment: The Confederacy had a strong commitment to their cause and was highly motivated to fight for their independence.

Weaknesses:

Economy and industry: The Confederacy had an agrarian economy, with limited industrial capabilities, making it difficult to sustain the war effort.

Population and manpower: The Confederacy had a smaller population than the Union, making it challenging to replace losses on the battlefield.

Lack of resources: The Confederacy lacked many of the resources necessary to fight a prolonged war, such as weapons, ammunition, and medical supplies.

In conclusion, the Union's strengths in industrial and economic power, population and manpower, and navy ultimately contributed to its victory in the war. Conversely, the Confederacy's strengths in military leadership, fighting on familiar terrain, and motivation and commitment were not enough to overcome its weaknesses in the economy and industry, population and manpower, and lack of resources.

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Francisco Goya's nineteenth-century print "I Saw This" serves as a commentary on the horrors of war. The print depicts a scene of a man lying on the ground, surrounded by several other men, who appear to be soldiers.

The man on the ground is wounded, with blood pouring from his head, and his face is contorted in agony. The soldiers around him seem indifferent to his suffering, and one of them is even smoking a pipe. The print is a powerful critique of the violence and cruelty that often accompany war, and it raises important questions about the ethics of military conflict. The title of the print, "I Saw This," suggests that Goya himself witnessed a scene similar to the one depicted in the print. This personal connection adds to the emotional impact of the work, and it underscores the artist's commitment to social justice and human rights. Goya was known for his strong political views, and his work often reflected his concern for the welfare of ordinary people. "I Saw This" is a prime example of this commitment, and it remains a powerful reminder of the devastating consequences of war.

Learn more about Francisco Goya's here

https://brainly.com/question/4004372

#SPJ11

Question: Write a short essay on the bitter rivalry between USA and USSR

Answer:

The bitter rivalry between the United States of America (USA) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) during the Cold War era is a defining chapter in modern history. Lasting from the end of World War II until the early 1990s, this intense and ideological struggle shaped global politics and had far-reaching consequences.

The roots of the rivalry can be traced back to the ideological differences between the two superpowers. The USA, representing liberal democracy and capitalism, stood as the champion of individual freedoms and free-market economics. On the other hand, the USSR, espousing communism, sought to establish a classless society and centralized control over the means of production. These conflicting ideologies formed the foundation for a clash of worldviews and power struggles.

The competition between the USA and USSR extended beyond ideological differences and manifested itself in various ways. The arms race was a prominent feature, as both nations sought to develop and maintain an arsenal of nuclear weapons. This race for military dominance escalated tensions and raised the specter of global destruction. Additionally, the USA and USSR engaged in a battle for influence, supporting opposing sides in conflicts around the world. Proxy wars, such as the Korean War and the Vietnam War, served as battlegrounds where the two superpowers indirectly confronted each other.

The bitter rivalry between the USA and USSR had significant global implications. It led to the division of the world into two spheres of influence, with the USA leading the Western bloc and the USSR leading the Eastern bloc. The division was marked by the establishment of military alliances, such as NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) by the USA and the Warsaw Pact by the USSR. This geopolitical divide created a state of constant tension and mistrust between the two superpowers.

However, it is important to note that amidst the rivalry, there were occasional moments of cooperation and détente. Both sides recognized the dangers of a direct military confrontation and engaged in negotiations to mitigate the risks. The signing of arms control agreements, such as the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) and the later START treaties, aimed to reduce the nuclear arsenals of both nations and ease tensions.

The bitter rivalry between the USA and USSR finally reached a turning point in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The USSR faced internal economic and political challenges that ultimately led to its dissolution. The Cold War came to an end, symbolized by the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the subsequent reunification of Germany. The rivalry that had defined global politics for decades was replaced by a new era of cooperation and geopolitical realignments.

In conclusion, the bitter rivalry between the USA and USSR during the Cold War was a defining period in history. Driven by ideological differences, it shaped global politics and had profound implications for the world. The competition between the two superpowers resulted in an arms race, proxy wars, and a division of influence. However, the eventual end of the Cold War demonstrated that even bitter rivals can find avenues for cooperation and peaceful resolutions. The legacy of this rivalry continues to influence international relations and serves as a reminder of the dangers and complexities of global power struggles.

Greco-Roman arts and culture had a significant impact on Western civilization, influencing everything from literature and art to politics and philosophy.

The Romans spread Greco-Roman arts and culture throughout their empire in a variety of ways, including through conquest, trade, and colonization. When the Romans conquered a new territory, they often brought with them their own cultural traditions and assimilated local customs and beliefs. As a result, Greco-Roman culture became a dominant cultural force throughout the Roman Empire.

Some of the characteristics of Greco-Roman arts and culture include:

Humanism: A focus on the individual and the human form, which was reflected in art, literature, and philosophy.

Realism: A commitment to representing the world accurately, which was reflected in the use of perspective and naturalistic techniques in art and the development of empirical science.

Aesthetics: A focus on beauty, harmony, and proportion, which was reflected in the use of symmetry and balance in art and architecture.

Rationalism: A belief in the power of reason and logic, which was reflected in the development of philosophy and science.

Overall, Greco-Roman arts and culture had a significant impact on Western civilization, influencing everything from literature and art to politics and philosophy. The legacy of this cultural synthesis can still be seen today in everything from our legal system to our artistic traditions.

Learn more about Greco-Roman Arts:

https://brainly.com/question/16247746

#SPJ11

Answer:

Fort William Henry “Massacre” Fort William Henry “Massacre” In the 1750s, the European imperial powers in North America, France and Britain, faced one another as rivals in the greater Lake Champlain region, an area of economic and strategic value to both.

Explanation:

Answer:The Indians brutally killed and scalped many of the British soldiers and then took hundreds of prisoners to Canada where they were held for ransom. Although early chroniclers claimed that as many as 1,500 British were killed, more recent analysis—based on period documents—places the number closer to 185.

Explanation:

The false statement is D. "Benin prospered because of the slave trade with Portugal."

In conclusion, he notion that Benin prospered primarily through the slave trade with Portugal is false, as the kingdom's prosperity was attributed to skilled artisans, metalworking, and a diverse economy.

For more questions on slave trade with Portugal:

https://brainly.com/question/790586

#SPJ8

Answer:

pilgrims because they were being persucted by people becasue they had differeny belifs and for freedom

Explanation:

Answer:

Plymouth colony was settled by Puritan separatists from the Church of England who wanted to avoid religious persecution. Massachusetts Bay Colony was settled by the Puritans for the same reasons. Quakers, who wanted to have freedom to practice their faith without interference.

The SEC was created in 1934 as one of President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal programs to help fight the devastating economic effects of the Great Depression and prevent any future market calamities.

As a result of Czar Nicholas's abdication of the throne in Russia, there was a. civil war and the establishment of a Communist government.

When the Czar abdicated, a provisional government came to power but they did not enjoy much support.

This led to a Communist government seizing control and a Civil War breaking out which was fought until the Communists took complete control.

Find out more on Czar Nicholas at https://brainly.com/question/514992.

#SPJ1

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

i dont know really i needed the points sorry

Explanation:

Answer:Supplies such as gasoline, butter, sugar and canned milk were rationed because they needed to be diverted to the war effort. War also disrupted trade, limiting the availability of some goods.

Explanation:

Answer:

Restrictions on imported foods, limitations on the transportation of goods due to a shortage of rubber tires, and a diversion of agricultural harvests to soldiers overseas all contributed to the U.S. government’s decision to ration certain essential items.

Answer:

In the modern era, there are many regulations put in place by the United Nations, as well as widespread social beliefs that the power of a country’s government should not be held entirely by one person. This method of government, known as absolutism, became increasingly common in Europe during the late 1500’s and throughout the 1600’s. In countries such as France, Spain, and England, royal kings held all of the power. A very small percentage of the population owned most of the wealth, with much of the population struggling to get by. In a 1639 excerpt from his writing, King Louis XIV of France compares himself to a god, stating that “And kings are the lieutenants and gods of the people, whose divine right it is to rule.” When one king is given unlimited power over a nation’s government, military, and leadership, the people have no say, and the ruler ends up leading their nation using corrupt ways only beneficial to the upper class and himself. Thankfully, society has changed, and in most countries, the people have some sort of say over their own government and leaders.

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

I'm answering it right now, I'm just commenting this so you know I'm writing the paragraph.

Answer and Explanation:

I don't think it was justified for the US to drop atomic bombs on civilians.

Their thought process was that if they were attack the innocent, then Japan would stop their aggression and call off the war. Only after the second atomic bomb occur did the Japanese surrender.

The civilians, whether they supported the war or not, shouldn't be killed, as they didn't do anything, are possibly manipulated, and are not the ones fighting. They were probably encouraged to support the war, and they also had forcibly given up their food to the soldiers to fight in the war. The Japanese kept on fighting because they didn't care how much of their people died as long as they will win the war.

#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

Answer:

Doctrine helped to unify early Christians by teaching them the differences between Judaism and Roman Catholic. However, the Pope led all Catholic churches and was the Bishop Rome while the bishops only led one specific church.

Explanation:

Answer:

hey mate your answer here

Answer:

By the end of the century, Europeans were aware of logarithms, electricity, the telescope and microscope, calculus, universal gravitation, Newton's Laws of Motion, air pressure, and calculating machines due to the work of the first scientists of the Scientific Revolution, including Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, René Descartes, Pierre Fermat, Blaise Pascal, Robert Boyle, Christiaan Huygens, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Robert Hooke, Isaac Newton, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. It was also a period of development of culture in general

Answer:

Event- Enclosure Acts prevented small farmers from working on common lands. Effect- People moved from rural to urban areas.

Event- Factory owners strived to increase profit. Effect- Workers were subjected to poor working conditions and long hours.

Event- Paid workers increased the demand for manufactured goods. Effect -Slavery became a less attractive form of labor.

Explanation:

During the 18th century, enclosures were regulated by Parliament which required each village to enclose its land. In other words, this acts allowed adding small landholdings into larger farms. All this led the small farmers to lose their land and move to the urban areas. The moving of the rural population in the urban areas led to the rise of urbanization in cities and town. Majority of people left their villages to find a better opportunity to earn money and to start a new life.

The industrial revolution also led to widespread poverty and filth among factory workers and children. Industries owners saw to their profit, not for the benefits of the worker. Factories workers forced to work for long shifts to earn wages in poor working condition.

As paid workers were earning wages, the demand for manufactured goods increased. The increase in demand was due to workers having capabilities to buy goods.  

The primary ways humans developed the ability to support civilizations such as those of Egypt and Mesopotamia include advancements in agriculture, the development of writing systems, the establishment of centralized governments, and the creation of social hierarchies.

These developments allowed for the efficient production and distribution of resources, the formation of complex societies, and the establishment of long-lasting empires.

In comparison, the civilization of Israel developed through a unique combination of cultural and religious traditions, as well as political and military strategies. While Israel was a relatively small state compared to its larger neighbors, it managed to survive and thrive through a combination of diplomacy, military strength, and cultural cohesion.

Despite facing many challenges and obstacles throughout its history, Israel has managed to maintain its distinct identity and contribute significantly to the cultural and intellectual history of the region.

To know more about social hierarchies, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/21475481#

#SPJ11

In Robert Horne's recruitment efforts, men were offered large land grants, economic opportunities, and political rights. Women received smaller land grants, limited economic opportunities, and had no political rights.

In Robert Horne's efforts to recruit settlers to Carolina in 1666, the benefits offered to men and women differed significantly.

For men, the primary benefits centered around economic opportunities and land ownership.

They were promised large land grants, enabling them to establish their own plantations and engage in profitable agriculture.

Men were granted political rights, including the ability to participate in the local government and decision-making processes.

However, for women, the benefits were more limited. While they could also receive land grants, the sizes were typically smaller compared to those given to men.

Women's primary roles were expected to be in the domestic sphere, supporting their husbands and families.

They were not granted political rights and had limited opportunities for independent economic activities.

Overall, the benefits for men in Horne's recruitment efforts emphasized economic and political empowerment, while women's benefits were more focused on supporting the family unit within a patriarchal society.

To learn more about economic, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14355320

#SPJ11

Answer:

d problem recognition

Explanation:

The federalists believed that the US should make money primarily from manufacturing due to the fact that they believed that it would make the country independent from foreign nations.

This was term that was used to refer to the people that were in favor of the United States having a centralized government during the creation of the constitution.

According to these people the US as a manufacturing country would stop them from being dependent on others for essential supplies and ammunitions.

Read more on the federalists here:

https://brainly.com/question/267094

Answer:

The act of intentionally bothering someone repeatedly is annoying

Answer:

b hope this  helps

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer would be C. Three(3)

Explanation:

We know the plane gets shot down first so it can be either 3 or 4, but the killing of tutsis begins after so it has to be 3

Answer: C

Capitalist governments created millions of jobs, and the middle class got to work there. Some lower class people even got jobs to the middle class.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact had set a military agreement between the Soviets and Nazis. This allowed for both sides to attack Poland and annex its territory. Britain and France had promised Poland its independence, making sure if Germany were to attack it they would declare all-out war. So they did on September 3rd, two days after the German invasion of Poland, starting WW2.

Answer: 1, 3 and 4

Explanation: