What do historians mean by "universalizing empires"? discuss two ways either imperial rome or han dynasty china fit this definition.
Answers
Universalizing empires aimed to create a sense of unity and order across diverse territories, often through religion or ideology, as seen in Rome's Latin language and Han China's Confucianism.
Historians use the term "universalizing empires" to refer to empires that exerted their power and influence over a vast geographical area and diverse peoples, and sought to establish a universal order based on shared culture, religion, language, and political institutions.
The Roman Empire is a prime example of a universalizing empire. One way in which it fit this definition was through the spread of Latin language and culture. The Romans imposed their language and culture on the territories they conquered, leading to the creation of a vast Latin-speaking population.
This helped to promote cultural unity and facilitated communication and trade across the empire. Another way in which Rome was a universalizing empire was through the spread of Roman law. Roman law became the basis for legal systems in many parts of the world and continues to influence legal systems today.
The Han dynasty of China also fits the definition of a universalizing empire. One way in which it achieved this was through the establishment of a centralized bureaucracy. The Han created a system of government that was based on meritocracy and allowed for social mobility. This system helped to unite the various regions of China and allowed for greater efficiency in governance.
Another way in which the Han was a universalizing empire was through the spread of Confucianism. Confucianism became the dominant philosophy in China and helped to promote moral and social order. The Han used Confucianism to create a common culture and value system throughout their empire, which helped to promote stability and unity.
To learn more about Universalizing empires refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/16798474
#SPJ11
Related Questions
The Iraq War is a subject of much debate. In the space below, construct a claim that supports or refutes the decision to invade Iraq. Your claim should be at least 250-words and follow these directions:
Research on your own and find a primary source on the Iraq War
A primary source is an original document or artifact that comes from the period of time being studied.
Someone from that time period actually wrote, created, or used the object the historian is studying.
Using the information from your primary source, and the information from the lesson, develop a claim concerning the decision to invade Iraq.
Fulfill the following concerning your claim:
Your claim should clearly state whether or not the U.S. should have invade Iraq.
Your claim must have supporting statements that are original ideas, as well as facts and evidence from your source, and information from the lesson, that supports it.
You should have a counterclaim that refutes your claim. Your writing will identify the stance and prove that it is false.
Write an informative essay that meets the following expectations:
Establishes and maintains formal and objective tone
Uses words, phrases, and clauses to link each section of writing together and create cohesion between claims and evidence
Follows expectations of conventions
Provide a concluding paragraph that:
Synthesizes your original claim
Summarizes your key points
Adds concluding thoughts
Cite your primary source and this lesson as a secondary source at the bottom of your essay.
Answers
Claim: The decision to invade Iraq by the United States was unjustified and should not have been undertaken.
Lack of substantial evidence: Despite claims of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the presence of such weapons was not conclusively proven, as stated by intelligence reports and subsequent investigations.Questionable motives: Some argue that the invasion was driven by geopolitical interests and a desire for control over Iraq's oil resources rather than genuine concerns for national security or democracy promotion.Destabilization of the region: The invasion led to a power vacuum, contributing to sectarian violence, the rise of extremist groups, and regional instability, rather than achieving stability and peace as intended.Humanitarian and economic costs: The war resulted in significant loss of civilian lives, military casualties, and financial burdens, diverting resources from pressing domestic needs and contributing to long-lasting consequences for the Iraqi population.Counterclaim: The invasion was necessary to remove a dangerous regime and promote democracy.Conclusion: Considering the lack of substantial evidence for WMDs, questionable motives, destabilization of the region, and the human and economic costs incurred, it can be argued that the decision to invade Iraq was unwarranted and should not have been pursued.For more such question on invade Iraq
https://brainly.com/question/26172813
#SPJ8
One of the successful strategies used by the Spanish government to combat the violence surrounding Basque separatism was the creation of _____.
Answers
One of the successful strategies used by the Spanish government to combat the violence surrounding Basque separatism was the creation of the "Antiterrorist Liberation Group".
The Antiterrorist Liberation Group, or GAL for short, was a state-sponsored anti-terrorism organization that was founded in the 1980s. The armed separatist organization Euskadi Ta Askatasuna (ETA), which sought an independent Basque country, was the focus of this clandestine paramilitary group's creation. Numerous of their activities resulted in the targeting and murder of innocent individuals, violence, and public indignation and condemnation.
Learn more about The Antiterrorist Liberation Group here:
https://brainly.com/question/31578989
#SPJ4
What do you think was the most positive impact of NOW and other women’s organizations?
Explain your choice in two or three sentences.
Answers
Answer:
i think woman being as equal as man
Explanation:
th most positive impact of ( NOW )and other women's organization is providing women an opportunity to change how society works allowing women to fully participate in society, so that they close the gender gap in terms of education, politics, employment, and are considered equal of men.
. NOW’s actions have helped put women in political posts; increased educational, employment, and business opportunities for women.
The most positive impact of NOW and other's woman organization is;
To helps to build confidence in woman, this has helped many woman to chase their dream and ambitions.To enhance inclusion especially in places or organization where woman are not known.What is Woman organization?Woman organization are woman groups that supports and enhance woman inclusivity in various spheres of life.
They give support by lending woman a voice, they give inputs or materials for business and scholarships.
no
Therefore, the most positive impact of NOW and other's woman organization is to helps to build confidence in woman.
Learn more organization here,
https://brainly.com/question/19334871
Select the correct answer.
Which of the following WAS NOT a Great Society program?
A.Clean Air Act
B.Head Start
C.Immigration Act
D.Social Security Act
E. Voting Rights Act
Answers
Place these kings in order from first to rule (at the top) to last to rule (at the bottom).
Reorder answers
1.King Saul
Reorder answers
2.King David
Reorder answers
3.King Solomon
Answers
Answer:
1. King Saul who reigned from 1037- 1010 BCE , 2. King David who reigned from 1010- 970 BCE , 3. King Solomon who reigned from 970-931 BCE
Explanation:
Answer:
king Saul-1037-1010 BCE
David- 1010–970 BCE
Solomon- 970–931 BCE
Explanation:
"The Old Testament Prophet Samuel (c. 1200–1050 BCE) is sent to Jesse of Bethlehem (a common farmer and shepherd)" to anoint one of his sons as the new king - while Israel's first king, Saul
After seven years, David became king of a reunited Kingdom of Israel.
Because David shed much blood, God denies David the opportunity to build the temple. Before his peaceful death, he chooses his son Solomon as successor
hope this helps :P
-KB
The Mexican-American War was the first war fought by the United States entirely on foreign soil, leading to the occupation of a foreign capital. The war was seen by its detractors as a war of aggression. Identify why the following American public figures opposed the Mexican War.Correct Answers:-Ulysses S Grant: This leader served with distinction in the Mexican War but referred to the conflict as "one of the most unjust (wars) ever waged by a stronger nation against a weaker nation."-Henry David Thoreau: This public figure was jailed for refusing to pay his taxes in protest of the war and later wrote an essay defending his actions entitled "On Civil Disobedience."-Abraham Lincoln: This freshman congressman was disgusted by the behavior of the administration.
Answers
The Mexican-American War was the first war fought by the United States.The following American public figures opposed the Mexican War are:
Ulysses S Grant: This leader served with distinction in the Mexican War but referred to the conflict as "one of the most unjust (wars) ever waged by a stronger nation against a weaker nation."Henry David Thoreau: This public figure was jailed for refusing to pay his taxes in protest of the war and later wrote an essay defending his actions entitled "On Civil Disobedience."Abraham Lincoln: This freshman congressman was disgusted by the behavior of the administration.What was the root cause of the Mexican-American War?
The immediate cause of the Mexican-American War was the disputed border between the United States and Texas on the Nueces Strip. Mexico does not recognize Texas as a legitimate U.S. territory, and the inclusion of Texas in the United States angered Mexican officials and citizens.
How did the Mexican-American War end?The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which formally ended the Mexican-American War (1846-48), was signed on February 2, 1848 in Guadalupe Hidalgo, the city where the Mexican government fled before the American advance.
Learn more about Mexican American war:
brainly.com/question/22623242
#SPJ4
According to michael klein, where have private companies been most successful at providing water?
Answers
According to Michael Klein, private companies have been most successful at providing water in countries such as Jakarta, France and Chile.
Depending on a number of variables, including the nation, the region, and the particular conditions, private enterprises may or may not be successful in delivering water services. Private enterprises have occasionally had success offering water services, especially in places where state utilities have had trouble due to inefficiency or poor infrastructure. These commercial businesses frequently employ a variety of business structures, including full privatization or public-private partnerships.
Michael Klein addressed the issue of water scarcity in various regions. According to him, Jakarta, France, and Chile, are a few examples of nations where private firms have been involved in the distribution of water. These nations have used various strategies with varying degrees of success to include the private sector in water management.
Read more about water on:
https://brainly.com/question/25796102
#SPJ4
Private companies have been most successful at providing water in countries where public utilities face challenges. Through investment, efficient management, and technological advancements, private companies have been able to improve water access and quality, benefiting the local population.
According to Michael Klein, private companies have been most successful at providing water in countries where public water utilities have struggled to meet the growing demand for clean and safe water. In these countries, private companies have been able to leverage their expertise, technology, and efficiency to improve water access and quality.
One example of a country where private companies have been successful is Bolivia. In the early 2000s, the city of Cochabamba faced severe water shortages and inadequate infrastructure. The government turned to a private consortium to manage the water system. The consortium invested in infrastructure upgrades, expanded access to underserved areas, and improved the efficiency of water delivery. As a result, water access and quality improved significantly in Cochabamba.
Another example is Manila, the capital of the Philippines. In the 1990s, the Manila Water Company took over the water supply services in the eastern part of the city. Through private investment and efficient management, they were able to improve water access, reduce water losses, and provide 24/7 water availability to customers.
In both cases, private companies were able to address the challenges faced by public utilities, leading to better water services for the local population. These examples demonstrate how private companies can play a crucial role in improving water access and quality in areas where public utilities are struggling.
Learn more about investment from this link
https://brainly.com/question/29547577
#SPJ11
The first Tacoma Narrows Bridge in Washington crossed over a strait in Puget Sound. At the time the suspension bridge was built, construction workers noticed that it moved up and down in the wind. Measures to stop the bridge’s movement were ineffective, but the bridge was opened to the public on July 1, 1940. The bridge collapsed on November 7, 1940. Luckily, no people were seriously injured.
Determine which technological design criteria the Tacoma Narrows Bridge did and did not meet. Explain your answer.
Answers
The Tacoma Narrows Bridge did, in fact, provide a temporary solution to a problem. The bridge was not sturdy, and when it fell, persons standing on or nearby could have been hurt.
On July 1st, 1940, the first Tacoma Narrows Bridge became a working bridge. On November 7, 1940, at 11:00 a.m., its main span collapsed into the Tacoma Narrows, four months after that. (Pacific time), possibly due to aeroelastic flutter brought on by a wind speed of 42 mph (68 km/h).
The failure of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in 1940 is still being used to improve science today. "Torsional flutter" is cited as the main cause of Galloping Gertie's failure. It will be beneficial to divide this extensive chain of occurrences into numerous phases.
The collapse of the bridge may have been prevented if the open stiffening trusses had been utilized instead of plate girders, allowing the wind to freely move through the bridge. A higher width/span ratio would have improved the bridge's rigidity.
To learn more about Tacoma Narrows Bridge visit:https://brainly.com/question/17924109
#SPJ9
Answer:
Sample Response: While the Tacoma Narrows Bridge solved a problem, it did not do so for long. The bridge was not durable and could have caused harm to people on or near the bridge at the time it collapsed.
Explanation:
Many countries that are now constitutional monarchies evolved from governments that were once considered absolute monarchies.
O True
O False
Answers
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Today constitutional monarchies are mostly associated with Western European countries such as the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Spain, Luxembourg, Monaco, Liechtenstein, and Sweden. However, the two most populous constitutional monarchies in the world are in Asia: Japan and Thailand.
Why does most Muslim artwork avoid showing images of people or other living things?
OMost Muslims believe that these images would lead to incorrect worship.
O Most Muslim artists believe that calligraphy and geometric forms are the highest forms of art.
O Most Muslims do not believe that any artwork could compare to the beauty of real living things.
O Most Muslim artists do not believe that studying life is not as valuable as showing beautiful architecture.
Answers
Answer:
they believe human form of art is prohibited
Which of the following describes one of the main purposes of the Department
of Homeland Security?
O A. Coordinating security measures to prevent terrorism
O B. Assisting struggling Americans during economic crises
C. Negotiating treaties with foreign governments
D. Encouraging the expansion of global free trade agreements
Answers
Answer:
Preparing the country's emergency response to a terrorist attack
Explanation:
What immigrants are brought to America to work on the transcontinental railroad?
Answers
Answer: Chinese Immigrants
Explanation:
From 1863 and 1869, roughly 15,000 Chinese workers helped build the transcontinental railroad. They were paid less than American workers and lived in tents, while white workers were given accommodation in train cars
Question is attached in the image below
Answers
Answer:
grassland and savannah that borders the desert area of the Sahara
Explanation:
look it up :)
which scientific theory did the scientific community in the 17th and 18th centuries decide best explained the properties of light
Answers
Wave model theory did the scientific community in the 17th and 18th centuries decide best explained the properties of light.
The wave model, also known as the wave theory (German: Wellentheorie), is a model of language change used in historical linguistics. It describes how a new feature of a language, or a new combination of features, spreads from its region of origin to a gradually expanding cluster of dialects. Like waves on the water, dialect diffusion propagates from a specific point of contact.
The hypothesis was designed to replace the tree model because it did not appear to be able to explain how various traits, particularly in the Germanic languages, came to exist by deriving from a proto-language. At its most ambitious, it completely replaces the language tree model.
Learn more about scientific theory to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/2385866
#SPJ4
Which of the following best describes warfare on the Western Front in World War One?
A It was fast paced and troops were constantly on the move.
B It mostly consisted of urban combat as German and French troops battled for control of major cities.
C The war was mostly fought in trenches and had very high casualties for both sides.
D The Western front saw mostly cavalry based warfare and small skirmishes.
Answers
Answer: C
Explanation:
The best answer to this question is C. The warfare on the Western Front in World War One was mostly fought in trenches, which resulted in high casualties for both sides. The trenches were a system of parallel ditches dug into the ground for protection from enemy fire. Soldiers would live and fight in the trenches for weeks or even months, often in horrible conditions with little access to food, clean water, or medical care. The Western Front was known for its brutal and prolonged battles, such as the Battle of the Somme and the Battle of Verdun, which resulted in huge numbers of casualties on both sides. The war on the Western Front was a war of attrition, with both sides trying to wear down the other until one side eventually gave up.
What is a right that you do not have yet as a U.S. citizen? What is a responsibility that you do not have yet?
Answers
Answer:
1. The right to vote in federal, state, and local elections (RIGHT)
2. Able to obtain a U.S. passport and have freedom to travel outside of the U.S. (RIGHT)
3. Able to serve on a jury. (RESPOSIBILITY)
4. Able to become eligible for certain jobs in the federal government that require citizenship. (RESPONSIBILITY)
Explanation:
There are several rights that people aren't able to receive yet until he/she reach the age of 18 or older. Therefore, these are the rights/responsibility that you do not have yet as a U.S. citizen.
please help! will give brainliest!!
What were the reasons for migration within the United States over the course of the nation's history? please give a thorough explanation, like 1-2 sentences would be good. thankssss:))
Answers
Answer:
the reasons are
Explanation:
Answer:
Because once America was becoming it's own country other people saw that they were living better so they came to America to have a better life as well. Also because America has good "job opportunities," so people came to get good jobs and have a better pay.
Why was the Great Plains attractive to settlers in the 1800s, even though it was sometimes referred to as the "Great American Desert"?
Answers
Explanation:Settlers moved to the Great Plains for several reasons. One reason was the government was offering 160 acres of land for free if the settler agreed to live on the land for five years. This was part of the Homestead Act of 1862. People had a significant interesting in owning land. This would give people a chance to farm this land.The Homestead Act and the Morrill Act were the two important land-grant acts that were passed in the Great Plains during the mid-1800s to help open the West to settlers. The Homestead Act was passed by Congress in 1862 to encourage settlement in the West by giving government-owned land to small farmers. Hope it helped!
Answer:
I think its D
Explanation:
I NEED NEWS!! Guys whats the 3 biggest news from Europe from this week 30th of January through 4 of February!! please help me find the BIGGEST news of this week I Can share about in class
Answers
Answer:
1. UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson to meet with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels to discuss Brexit: UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson is set to meet with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels on Wednesday, February 3rd, to discuss the UK’s exit from the European Union. The meeting is seen as a last-ditch attempt to break the impasse between the two sides and reach a Brexit trade deal in time for the end of the transition period on December 31st.
2. France announces new nationwide coronavirus lockdown: On Wednesday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced a third nationwide lockdown in France to stem the spread of the coronavirus. The measures, which will be in effect until February 16th, include the closure of schools and non-essential businesses, a ban on travel between regions, and a curfew from 8pm to 6am.
3. EU vaccine rollout faces delays due to supply issues: The European Union’s vaccination program is facing delays due to supply issues, with many countries struggling to receive enough doses to vaccinate their citizens. The European Commission has called on vaccine producers to step up their efforts to fulfill their contractual obligations, as well as urged member
Select the correct answer.
What did Congress charter in 1816?
Ο Α.
the First Bank of United States
OB.
the Second Bank of the United States
OC. judicial review
OD.
a system of checks and balances
Answers
Answer:
The answer is the second bank of the United states.
Explanation:
Congress established the First Bank of the United States in 1791 to serve as a repository for Federal funds. Its charter expired in 1811, but in 1816 Congress created a Second Bank of the United States with a charter set to expire in 1836.
What are the mysteries of the Cahokia and Teotihuacán
Answers
Cahokia and Teotihuacán are two ancient civilizations that have left behind fascinating archaeological sites, yet they still hold many mysteries and unanswered questions. Here are some of the mysteries surrounding Cahokia and Teotihuacán:
1. Cahokia:
Cahokia, located near present-day St. Louis, Missouri, was once the largest city in North America during the Mississippian culture (900-1500 CE). Despite its prominence, there are still enigmatic aspects of Cahokia's civilization. One mystery revolves around the purpose and function of the massive earthen mounds found at the site. These mounds, such as Monk's Mound, were monumental structures that served various purposes, including ceremonial, residential, and administrative. However, the exact rituals and activities conducted on these mounds remain uncertain.
Another mystery is the decline and abandonment of Cahokia. By the 14th century, the city's population dwindled, and it was eventually abandoned. The reasons behind this decline are still debated among scholars. Possible factors include environmental changes, political instability, social conflicts, or the spread of diseases. Unraveling the specific causes of Cahokia's decline would shed light on the factors that shaped the fate of this once-thriving civilization.
2. Teotihuacán:
Teotihuacán, located near modern-day Mexico City, was one of the largest and most influential cities in ancient Mesoamerica. Its monumental architecture, including the Pyramid of the Sun and the Pyramid of the Moon, reflects the city's grandeur. However, much about Teotihuacán remains a mystery. One enigma is the identity of its rulers and the nature of its political organization. Despite extensive archaeological research, no clear evidence of kings or a centralized ruling system has been found.
Another mystery is the purpose and symbolism behind the elaborate murals and iconography found throughout the city. The meanings behind the intricate frescoes and carvings are still not fully understood, leaving room for interpretation and speculation.
Additionally, the collapse of Teotihuacán is another unresolved mystery. Around the 7th century CE, the city experienced a decline and eventual abandonment. The causes of this collapse, such as social unrest, environmental factors, or external invasions, are still subjects of ongoing research and debate.
Studying and uncovering the mysteries of Cahokia and Teotihuacán is an ongoing endeavor that involves archaeological investigations, interdisciplinary research, and the analysis of cultural and historical contexts. By piecing together the fragments of these ancient civilizations, we can gain a deeper understanding of their complexities and the factors that shaped their rise and fall
for more questions on .archaeological
https://brainly.com/question/928273
#SPJ8
Write a short paragraph that explains the central idea of the article. Use at least two details from the article to support your response.
Article: Fighting wildfires with fire in Alberta, Canada
A large wildfire has been burning in Alberta, Canada. It has quickly spread for hundreds of miles. Now, a fifth of the houses in the city of Fort McMurray are lost. Because of this, 88,000 people living there have been evacuated.
The flames seemed to slow down over the weekend. This might be a turning point, but can a wildfire this large be put out?
Setting Control Fires
Bruce Malamud is a professor in London, England, who studies dangerous natural events. He says that there are a few ways to stop a fire. In order to burn, fire needs heat, air, and dry plants. Firefighters can remove any one of these to stop wildfires from spreading. It is also possible to stop the fire from spreading in certain directions. Firefighters sometimes start fires intentionally. These are called control fires. Once plants are burned, wildfire can no longer
use them to spread. Planes called water bombers are sometimes used too. They drop water, or other fire suppressants, over burning land.
Danger Of Burning Ash
Fire can spread a large distance away from the fire-front. This happens when burning ash is carried by the wind. This will often start other fires elsewhere.
John Thomson studies the forests in Scotland. Thomson says that to fight the fire it is important to study the wind, dry plants, and the slope of the land. Wind cannot really be helped. This is why firefighters will pay close attention to the weather. If it blows the right way, the wind can push the fire back along its path. If not, the wind will help it spread.
Wildfire is able to spread by burning dry plants on the ground and trees. These plants are called fuel. Firefighters and forest guards deal with dry plants by bulldozing them out of the way.
Always Staying Downhill
Knowing the shape of the land can also help. "Fires burn much more aggressively going uphill than they do downhill," says Thomson. It is a bad idea to try to fight fire from uphill.
In Alberta, firefighters will try to stay on the downhill side of a slope.
When a fire is small and moving downhill, it could be attacked directly. In this case, firefighters beat the flames with special tools. They will move from behind the fire, where the land has already been burned. In this way, they can make sure that the fire will not go back in their direction.
In Alberta, an indirect attack may be better. Firefighters may have to get in front of the fire and set control lines. These control where the fire can spread. Control lines can be set by using something like a highway or river.
Water bombers can also help to set control lines. They are often used to wet the plants ahead of the fire, or along its sides. This slows it down as it spreads forward or gets bigger. As Thomson says, this is more useful than just dropping water on the fire.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The central idea of the article is that fighting wildfires with fire can be an effective strategy to control their spread. Two details from the article support this idea. Firstly, the article mentions that firefighters sometimes start intentional fires, known as control fires, to remove potential fuel sources and prevent the wildfire from spreading further. These control fires consume the dry plants and make it difficult for the wildfire to use them as a means of spreading. Secondly, the article highlights the use of water bombers, which drop water or fire suppressants on burning land and wet the plants ahead of the fire or along its sides. This technique slows down the fire's spread and proves to be more effective than simply dropping water on the fire itself. By employing these strategies, firefighters can gain better control over wildfires and minimize their destructive impact.
What was one important achievement of Greek civilization? O A. Developing the first written language O B. Creating a mythology O C. Granting women equal rights O D. Uniting all Greek people under one empire
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
How are the crusaders identified in the painting? by their armor by their weapons and horses by the red crosses on their backs by the thrones on which they are sitting
Answers
The crusaders are identified in the painting by the red crosses on their backs.
The crusaders in this painting are identifiable by the red crosses on their backs. This signifies their membership in the Crusader order, which was a Catholic military order that fought in the Crusades.
Painting involves using a brush and paint to create a masterpiece on a canvas. Painting is a great way to express your creativity and to show your personality. It can be a fun and relaxing activity, or it can be a way to express your emotions. Whether you’re a beginner or a professional, painting is a great way to express yourself.
Hence, the correct option is "THIRD".
To know more about painting, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/16924169
#SPJ4
Answer:
the thrid one
Explanation:
1. Describe three goals of the New
Deal.
Answers
Answer:
Relief, recovery, reform
Explanation:
Relief: providing jobs. Immediate economic relief for the people detrimentally affected by the Great Depression
Recovery: government programs to increase economic stability. creating new jobs and spending federal money to revive the economy
Reform: reform systematic economic weaknesses. Implemented new regulations and permanent programs into the financial system to avoid another Great Depression in the future
70. The __________ Act of 1966 allows any person to request access to federal agency records or information not determined to be a matter of national security.
Answers
Answer: Freedom of Information
Explanation:
Oversimplifications differ from generalizations because they:
a. can only be properly used in explanatory essays.
b. often lead researchers to plagiarize other historians' work.
c. fail to account for evidence that might contradict a claim.
d. are used to support claims of fact but not claims of value.
Answers
The correct answer is c- fail to account for evidence that might contradict a claim.
Oversimplifications occur when complex or nuanced subjects are overly simplified, disregarding important details or counterarguments. Unlike generalizations, which are broader statements that capture patterns or tendencies, oversimplifications ignore the complexity and potential contradictions within a topic. They can hinder a comprehensive understanding by neglecting relevant evidence or alternative perspectives.
Therefore, option c is the correct choice, as oversimplifications fail to account for evidence that might contradict a claim.
To know more about Oversimplification visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12343490
#SPJ11
GIVING BRAINLIEST -24 PTS-
Answers
Answer:
I'm pretty sure B.
Explanation:
Sorry if wrong :> I hope you have a lovely day ^_^ you're a awesome person :3
explain why women should be allowed to vote using the first amendment .
I brainlist on whoever has the best answer
Answers
Answer:
Women should be allowed to vote using the first amendment because laws affect women just as much as men.
I don't really have much to say, lol.
answer my question I need help hurry please
Answers
Explanation:
1. sir , please tell us what is happening here and why?
1. their goal is to round- up all of us and take us away from our land against our wills. General Winfield Scott 7,000 troops he stood by and did nothing to help us as all of us carried all our belonging on an 850 - mile march"
2. Sir, what were the cases of Cherokee Nation V. Georgia and Worchester v. Georgia? how do the cases relate to what is happening now?
2." We all decide that we were in independent nation , so we decide to leave Georgia, so we don't have state laws being forced upon us anymore. The U.S supreme court told Samuel Worcester to leave because non- Indian people were not supposed to be on the Indian lands with out and kind if identification or license to prove they could be there. however, they lost so we all had leave our lands leading up to this"
3. Ma, am please tell us about how this movement is affecting your people, now and for the future.
3. " Many of the children and the oldest tribe member have died. they had died from the disease that people had, there was no food, the temperatures that we faced, along with horrible treatment. this has affected us because we don't have much space to do anything so the diseases spread like wild fire.
4. what was Robert Lindeux purpose in painting this event? what evidence in the painting suggests his purposes?
4. Robert Lindeux loved the west. he took pictures of amazing moments. he also had an artistic outlet. he was always willing to help the Indians for they had to deal with bad treatment. Robert Lindeux always did this job well.