What did the North declare August 6, 1861?

Answer:

American entry into World War II was not inevitable, but it was highly likely.

Explanation:

The United States had significant economic and strategic interests in both Europe and Asia, and it was increasingly obvious that Germany and Japan intended to enlarge their spheres of influence at the expense of the United States and its allies.

The decision to join World War II on both the European and Pacific fronts was made by the United States.

After carefully weighing the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative, it was decided that the United States could not afford to let either Germany or Japan achieve its objectives without endangering its own security.

Learn more about American entry into World War II from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/31024704

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You did not include any particular reference so we do not know the documents you include as reference.

However, trying to help you we can comment on the following.

It is correct to say that the "Gilded Age" usually refers to business and worker interests in the period after Reconstruction to about 1900.

The aspect of the farmers’ experiences during this time that is similar is that they suffer many problems and tribulations during the Gilded Age, as was the case of the workers that labored in the big industries in the larger cities such as New York, Chicago, or Pittsburgh.

The American farmers were living in deep debt during the Gilded Age. They knew they had the risk of losing their properties and farms due to that debt. It was a time when the prices of the crops were down, making things worse. Another issue was the price railroads charged to transport their crops. It was too expensive for farmers.

During this Gilded Age, corruption actions in the government allowed the creation of monopolies as was the case of the Standard Oil Company owned by John D. Rockefeller or the US Steel Company owned by Andrew Carnegie.

The Treaty of Versailles is what officially and properly ended World War I. Although it ended the war, it put very harsh conditions on Germany that angered many and lead to their economic depression.

The Treaty of Versailles was signed on June 28, 1919, between both Germany and the Allied powers, this put an end to World War I. American President Woodrow Wilson did not want to be harsh on Germany. He had created his Fourteen Points, which were known to be pretty peaceful. While he did believe that Germany should be punished for its crimes, he did not want to do it very harshly and really only wanted to target the leaders, not the innocent people.

At the end of the day, nobody really agreed with Wilson. Many leaders wanted Germany to pay for what they did, so the Treaty of Versailles was created. This treaty is known to be incredibly harsh on Germany, hurting the people, the economy, and even leading to World War II.

Under the Treaty of Versailles, Germany had to take the blame for everything. Germany thought this was very unfair, they thought they had just as much to do with World War I as anybody else did. Along with taking the blame, they had to give up a lot of their military, vehicles, equipment, land, and had to pay billions of dollars in reparations. This obviously lead to their economic depression and struck resentment in the German people, eventually being a cause of World War II.

The Allies assist and sell during World War II: international locations should cooperate to result in and preserve global peace., international locations need to now not wage wars or dedicate conflict crimes in a desire to govern other nations.

Hitler's invasion of Poland in September 1939 drove superb Britain and France to claim struggle against Germany, marking the beginning of World War II. Over the following six years, the war could take greater lives and ruin greater land and belongings around the world than any preceding warfare.

On September 2, World War II ended while U.S. popular Douglas MacArthur normalized Japan's formal give-up aboard the U.S. battleship Missouri, anchored in Tokyo Bay at the side of a flotilla of more than 250 Allied warships.

Lasting six years and sooner or later, the second  global battle commenced on 1 September 1939 with Hitler's invasion of Poland and ended with the Japanese surrender on 2 September 1945.

Learn more about World War II here: https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ4

The War of 1812 had significant effects on industry in the United States and played a role in shaping the subsequent evolution of American industry.

During the war, the British imposed a naval blockade, which severely disrupted American trade and commerce. As a result, American merchants and manufacturers faced significant challenges in exporting their goods and obtaining necessary imports. The blockade led to a decline in international trade and put a strain on American industries dependent on foreign markets.

However, the war also spurred domestic industrial development within the United States. The disruption of trade motivated Americans to become more self-reliant and less dependent on foreign goods. This need for self-sufficiency and the lack of access to imported goods prompted the growth of domestic manufacturing industries.

The war helped foster the growth of American industry in several ways:

1. Increased demand for domestic products: With limited access to British goods due to the blockade, Americans turned to domestically produced goods, leading to an increased demand for American-made products.

2. Expansion of manufacturing: The war prompted the expansion of manufacturing industries, particularly those involved in producing war-related goods such as weapons, uniforms, and military supplies. This increase in manufacturing capacity laid the foundation for future industrial growth.

3. Technological advancements: The war stimulated technological advancements in industries such as textiles, ironworks, and shipbuilding. Manufacturers invested in machinery and innovation to improve efficiency and productivity.

4. Infrastructure development: The need for improved transportation and communication systems became evident during the war. As a result, the government invested in infrastructure projects, including road construction, canal building, and the expansion of the transportation network, which facilitated the growth of industry.

After the war, American industry continued to evolve and expand. The newfound sense of national pride and the desire for economic independence fueled the growth of manufacturing industries. The protective tariffs implemented in the aftermath of the war further supported domestic industry by providing a level of protection against foreign competition.

The War of 1812, while disruptive in the short term, ultimately spurred the growth of American industry by encouraging domestic manufacturing, technological innovation, infrastructure development, and a shift toward self-sufficiency. These developments laid the groundwork for the industrialization and economic expansion that would define the United States in the years to come.

To know more about evolution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12271572

#SPJ11

The statement describes the direct result of President Reagan deregulating the savings and loan industry Some companies adopt risky policies and collapsed.

This statement describes the direct result of President Reagan's deregulating the savings and loan industry. Deregulation allowed savings and loan associations to make risky investments, such as in commercial real estate, which led to their collapse when these investments failed. The collapse of the savings and loan industry cost taxpayers billions of dollars and was one of the largest financial scandals in American history.

To learn more about, President Reagan deregulation of the savings and loan industry

https://brainly.com/question/9745245

https://brainly.com/question/16084639

In the article, "I Have a Dream" by Martin Luther King Jr., he delivered a memorable speech on August 28, 1963. This speech, given during the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, was a defining moment for the civil rights movement.

King used several rhetorical devices to emphasize his main points and evoke an emotional response from his audience. Overall, I believe that King's speech was incredibly effective for several reasons. To begin with, King utilized repetition throughout the speech to emphasize his main points and make them stick in the minds of his listeners.

The famous phrase "I have a dream" was repeated several times throughout the speech, which helped to reinforce the idea that the civil rights movement was about more than just political rights. He also used the repetition of "Let freedom ring" to inspire hope in the hearts of his listeners.

Additionally, King utilized several other rhetorical devices throughout the speech, such as alliteration, metaphors, and hyperbole, to engage his audience and emphasize his message. For example, he described segregation as a "lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity." This metaphor helped to illustrate the stark contrast between the lives of white and black Americans.

Finally, I believe that King's speech was effective because of the way he appealed to his listeners' emotions. He used vivid imagery to paint a picture of a better future, which gave his listeners a sense of hope and inspiration. He also used powerful words and phrases to appeal to their sense of morality, such as "justice," "freedom," and "equality."

To know more about Luther visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29302454

#SPJ11

Answer:

Lincoln's purpose is to convince Northerners and the Southerners to work together to reunite the country without slavery and he suggests that it is God's purpose.

Explanation:

Religious references are likely to be well received by both sides. Also, wants the audience to think about the moral aspects of what has occurred and attend to its own conscience.

Income can significantly influence one's political opinion as it often affects a person's views on economic policies and social welfare programs.

People with higher incomes may have different political views than those with lower incomes due to their economic status and interests. For example, people with higher incomes may be more likely to support lower taxes and less government regulation, as they may benefit from these policies.

On the other hand, people with lower incomes may be more likely to support policies that address income inequality, such as progressive taxation and government assistance programs.

Therefore, income can influence one's political opinion by shaping their economic interests, values, and priorities.

Read more about Public Opinion here:

https://brainly.com/question/984649

#SPJ1

Answer: c

Explanation: endogamy

During the 1970s, conservatives insisted on more local control and resisted the power of the federal government.

Conservatives believed in limiting the reach and authority of the federal government and promoting the idea of states' rights. They argued for greater autonomy and decision-making power at the local level.

This approach was a response to the perceived overreach of the federal government in areas such as civil rights and social programs. So, in summary, during the 1970s, conservatives emphasized local control and resisted the power of the federal government.

To know more about autonomy visit:

brainly.com/question/31939566

#SPJ11

When the Stamp Act Resolves passed, Governor Fauquier dissolved the House of Burgesses.

The Stamp Act Resolves were a series of resolutions passed by the Virginia House of Burgesses in response to the Stamp Act, which was passed by the British Parliament in 1765. The Stamp Act required colonists to pay a tax on all printed materials, including newspapers, legal documents, and playing cards. The Virginia Resolves declared that only the Virginia Assembly had the right to tax Virginia citizens, and that any attempt to tax Virginians without their consent was a violation of their rights as Englishmen.

Learn more about Stamp Act Resolves here:https://brainly.com/question/7518386

#SPJ11

The Embargo Act most reminded Americans of the Townshend Acts.

The Townshend Acts were a series of measures imposed by the British Parliament on the American colonies in 1767. These acts placed taxes on various imported goods, including tea, glass, paper, and paint. The purpose of the Townshend Acts was to generate revenue for the British government and assert its authority over the colonies. The acts were met with resistance from the American colonists, who argued against taxation without representation and boycotted the taxed goods.

The Embargo Act of 1807, on the other hand, was a policy implemented by the United States government under President Thomas Jefferson. It aimed to exert economic pressure on Britain and France during the Napoleonic Wars by prohibiting American ships from trading with foreign nations. The Embargo Act was highly unpopular among American merchants and resulted in significant economic hardships. Like the Townshend Acts, it was met with resistance and criticism from the American public.

While there are similarities between the Embargo Act and other policies listed, such as the Stamp Act and the Sugar Act, the Townshend Acts are the most directly comparable in terms of their economic impact and the backlash they generated from the American colonies.

To know more about the Townshend Acts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33633289
#SPJ11

Answer:

Summary of the topic is given below.

Explanation:

In capitalism, the government's role is limited to maintain law and peace in the country by making the defense of the country stronger. In socialism, the role of government is not limited. The government controls all aspects of economy such as production of goods, its distribution, and consumption by people. In communism, most of the factors regarding production controls by the government and also provides necessary resources needed for the production of goods.

On July 17, 1975, during the Apollo-Soyuz mission, the United States and the Soviet Union hooked up in orbit and shook hands, officially putting an end to the space competition.(option c)

The majority of historians concur that space race came to an end on July 20, 1969, when Neil Armstrong took his first steps on the Moon. The US achieved victory with the moon landing, which served as the pinnacle of aerospace history and exploration.

The U.s effectively "won" the space program that had started with the launch of Sputnik in 1957 by setting foot on the moon. The Soviet Union, on the other hand, made four unsuccessful efforts between 1969 and 1972 to fly a lunar landing craft, including a dramatic launch-pad accident in July 1969.

To know more about space program visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15211990

#SPJ1

Complete question: What marked the end of the space race?  

a) NASA ran out of money

b) The Soviet Union lost interest

c) The leaders of the two nations agreed to collaborate

d )The space race continues to this day​

Answer: It’s their natural rights

true this thing says 20 more characters but yes true

The historian has formulated a hypothesis that a natural disaster might have destroyed the civilization. Hence, the next step the historian should take is to test the hypothesis.

Testing the hypothesis involves collecting and analyzing evidence to see if there is any support for the idea that a natural disaster may have destroyed the ancient civilization. The historian could review archaeological records, geological data, and other historical accounts to determine if there is evidence of a natural disaster during the time period in question.

Once the historian has gathered and analyzed the evidence, they can draw a conclusion based on their findings. Therefore, option (2) is the correct answer.

Option (1) is incorrect because asking a question comes before formulating a hypothesis.

Option (3) is incorrect because drawing a conclusion comes after testing the hypothesis and analyzing the evidence.

Option (4) is incorrect because making an educated guess is a step in formulating a hypothesis, which has already been done in this case.

Answer:

h m m m i'm not really sure to be honest.but i feel like we should open up more to third parties because they rarely win and i feel like there's more good people i'm not really sure.right now?maybe.both trump and Biden aren't good in ways so yeah.third parties should have a chance to speak

Explanation:

These include acts of violence that jeopardize life, torture, and physical or psychological coercion, all of which are recognized to violate even the most basic human rights.

These include acts of violence that jeopardize life, torture, and physical or psychological coercion, all of which are recognized to violate even the most basic human rights, as well as disregard for several due process rights. The use of human shields is expressly prohibited under the Convention.

Additionally, it states in Article 51 that citizens may not be forced to labor for an occupying power unless certain rigorous requirements are satisfied. The Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law applicable in Armed Conflict adopted the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions.

Learn more about human rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/28718604

#SPJ1

Answer:

America

Explanation:

Violence erupted in 1962 when James Meredith attempted to integrate the University of Mississippi. James Meredith was an African American man who in 1962 was trying to enroll in the University of Mississippi, which at the time was an all-white institution.

Meredith was met with fierce resistance from the governor of Mississippi, Ross Barnett, who promised to keep the university segregated. In response, Meredith sued the university for discrimination and won his case in court. Despite this victory, Meredith still faced extreme violence and hostility when he attempted to register for classes at the university. On September 30, 1962, he and a group of federal marshals were met by a mob of angry white protesters, and violence quickly erupted. The protesters threw rocks and bricks, set fires, and fired guns at the marshals. In the end, two people were killed and many more were injured. The violence lasted for several days before President John F. Kennedy finally sent in federal troops to restore order. James Meredith did eventually enroll in the University of Mississippi, but it was at a great cost. His bravery and determination helped pave the way for future civil rights activists who would fight for equal rights for all Americans. James Meredith's attempt to integrate the University of Mississippi in 1962 was met with extreme violence and hostility from the governor of Mississippi, Ross Barnett, and a mob of angry white protesters. Despite winning his case in court, Meredith and federal marshals were met with rocks, bricks, and gunfire when they attempted to register for classes at the university. Two people were killed and many more were injured before President John F. Kennedy sent in federal troops to restore order. James Meredith's bravery and determination in the face of such violence helped pave the way for future civil rights activists who would fight for equal rights for all Americans. The violence at the University of Mississippi was just one of many examples of the deep-seated racism and discrimination that African Americans faced in the United States in the 1960s. It was a time of great upheaval and change, as people fought for their rights and challenged the status quo. Ultimately, it was through the efforts of people like James Meredith that progress was made and the country moved closer to fulfilling its promise of freedom and equality for all.

James Meredith's attempt to integrate the University of Mississippi in 1962 was a turning point in the struggle for civil rights in the United States. Despite facing extreme violence and hostility, Meredith's bravery and determination helped pave the way for future civil rights activists who would fight for equal rights for all Americans. The violence at the University of Mississippi was just one example of the deep-seated racism and discrimination that African Americans faced in the 1960s. However, it was through the efforts of people like James Meredith that progress was made and the country moved closer to fulfilling its promise of freedom and equality for all.

to know more about activists visit:

brainly.com/question/28115615

#SPJ11

Hey there! I'm happy to help!

From, the excerpt provided, I see the words Jewish and gas chambers. These are key words that help us figure out that it is about the Holocaust, because during this horrific event Jewish people were gathered up, put into concentration camps, and sometimes gassed to death.

I have not read Maus but I do know that it is about the Holocaust. Many images talk about Hitler, the despot the pioneered the horrific Holocaust.

Therefore, the main theme addressed in both excerpts in The Holocaust.

I hope that this helps! Have a wonderful day!

Answer:

C.) Some truths are too difficult to fathom if one has not experienced them.

Explanation:

Answer:

I believe the answer is b. because The Know Nothing movement also briefly emerged as a major political party in the form of the American Party, and they were primarily an anti-Catholic, anti-immigration, and xenophobic movement, originally starting as a secret society. So they wouldn't be supported by Catholics if they were anti-Catholic, right?

Answer:

February 12, 2001. It had two medium-sized craters.

Radio was the most dominant form of communication in world war 2.

In 1896, the radio was invented by Guglielmo Marconi. The military needed to send messages across the world as quickly as possible as it allowed for real-time communication over long distances and was used extensively for both strategic and tactical communication.
Other forms of communication were also important during world war 2, including the use of carrier pigeons. Overall, radio and telegraph were the most important and dominant forms of communication during world war 2.

Learn more about world war 2 here:
https://brainly.com/question/3411906

Following World War II (1939-1945), television became the dominant form of communication. This was a significant turning point in the history of communication, as it marked a shift from the dominance of print media  and radio to the emergence of the visual medium of television.

Television became popular due to its ability to provide a new level of immediacy and impact on the audience, allowing them to experience events in real-time with greater clarity and realism than was possible with print or radio.

The increased availability of television sets, coupled with improvements in technology, meant that television became a mass medium with significant influence on public opinion, politics, and culture.

Television's impact was felt in many areas, including advertising, news, entertainment, and education. Advertisers recognized the power of television to reach large audiences and began to create commercials designed specifically for television.

News programs such as CBS News and NBC News provided extensive coverage of events around the world, and television dramas and sitcoms became popular forms of entertainment.

Television also played a significant role in the civil rights movement and other social movements, bringing images of injustice and inequality into people's homes and raising awareness of the need for change. Overall, the emergence of television marked a significant shift in the way people communicated and received information, shaping the world we live in today.

Know more about print media here:

https://brainly.com/question/29884875

#SPJ11

The onset of the scientific revolution in sixteenth-century Europe was mostly contributed by the publication of new theories related to astronomy. The new theories were formulated by Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, and Galileo Galilei.

The scientific revolution was a period of major scientific discoveries, which began in Europe in the mid-16th century and continued until the late 17th century. The period was marked by fundamental changes in scientific thinking and developments in mathematics, physics, astronomy, biology, and chemistry. The publication of new theories related to astronomy, such as those developed by Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, and Galileo Galilei, was the most significant contribution to the onset of the scientific revolution in sixteenth-century Europe. During this period, they challenged the Aristotelian notion that the Earth was at the center of the universe and that everything revolved around it.

According to the Copernican theory, the Earth revolves around the sun, and not the other way around. Kepler added that the orbit of the planets was not circular but elliptical, whereas Galileo confirmed the heliocentric theory by observing that the moons of Jupiter also orbited around the sun. Thus, it was the publication of new theories related to astronomy that contributed to the onset of the scientific revolution in sixteenth-century Europe.

Learn more about the scientific revolution here:

brainly.com/question/14231443

#SPJ11