What conclusion can you draw from Hilliary Clinton accepting the job of Secretary of State?

Answer:

Settling the West had both positive and negative effects on the region and its people. On the positive side, settlement brought economic growth, increased population, and the expansion of the United States. New industries emerged, including mining, ranching, and agriculture, which created jobs and increased trade. The development of railroads also helped connect the West to other parts of the country, making transportation of goods and people faster and more efficient.

However, there were also negative effects of settling the West. The displacement and mistreatment of Native American populations was a major injustice. The forced relocation of indigenous peoples from their ancestral lands, often to reservations with limited resources, led to the loss of their culture, traditions, and way of life. The destruction of natural habitats and ecosystems through deforestation, overgrazing, and mining also had negative effects on the environment. The use of natural resources, such as water and timber, often led to overexploitation and depletion, further damaging the environment.

The development of railroads in the West also had significant effects on the physical environment. Railroads required large amounts of resources, including timber for railroad ties and fuel for locomotives. Deforestation and mining for resources led to soil erosion, water pollution, and the destruction of ecosystems. The construction of railroad tracks often required blasting through mountains and laying tracks over sensitive habitats, further damaging the environment.

In addition, the introduction of new species of plants and animals, often brought by settlers, had unintended consequences on the environment. Invasive species disrupted the natural balance of ecosystems, outcompeting native species and causing ecological harm.

In conclusion, the settling of the West had both positive and negative effects, and it is important to recognize both in order to understand the impact of this period of history. The effects of railroads on the physical environment were significant, and the long-term consequences of these developments are still being felt today.

Answer:

The 4th

Explanation:

The Fourth Amendment bars the government from unreasonable search and seizure of an individual or their private property.

Answer:

I would say famine and lack of land.

Explanation:

I'm not 100 percent but if the pull factors are jobs and land that means they are struggling to find/keep jobs were they are (meaning they wouldn't have money of food = famine) and they do not have the amount of land they want. These things would push someone out of where they are now to find somewhere where they can have what they want/need.

I hope that makes since.

Answer: No, cite only original content from social media sites. If you want to cite content from a social media post or account that is not the original source of the content, cite it directly. If you cite a non-public post, your readers will likely not be able to see the post and verify its use in your paper. Other apps and platforms can require registration, payment, or download before access is possible.

dude above me

Explanation:

Answer:im wasted over the du

Explanation:

Answer:

B. self government

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it is B.

Explanation:

Let me know if I got it wrong if I do then I'm sorry.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

I'm just built different trust me

Answer:

The answer is true

Explanation:

Quizlet.

Answer:

B. Fear of provoking war with Mexico.

Explanation:

Mexico had just allowed Texas to be independent through the Texas Resolution (Texas used to be a part of Mexico) Also Texas was a slave state which means it would tip the balance to lean for slavery, not against slavery.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

She helped English settlers Louis and Clark and for that she is an important part of our early American history

Answer: No, he is not

Explanation:

tNo, he is not because he killed Moctezuma and looted them for their suns of gold and moons of silver. Moctezuma thought he was a god but he lied to them just to steal their riches. Additionally, he killed their people and some of them even joined him because they didn't like how they were being treated.

In Conclusion, No he is not a reliable source because he lied about being a God, killing them and looting their entire village.

Answer:

yes because off Joe Biden every almost every country has turned on us so yes they can so all ready have missals pointed at us so yes

Explanation:

Answer:

I believe it's

The Normandy invasion was a significant turning point during the war.

Germany experienced the most casualties during the Normandy invasion.

and possibly The number of German casualties and their previous losses likely made it difficult for Germany to recover. but im not 100% sure I hope this helps

Answer:

Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden was a Saudi Arabian-born militant and founder of the pan-Islamic militant organization Al-Qaeda. The group is designated as a terrorist group by the United Nations Security Council, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the European Union, and various other countries.

can you send me a picture from the less

Answer:

The President is responsible for implementing and enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet. The Vice President is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency should the need arise.

Answer:

I think it would be "B"  The second option. I hope this helps you!

Answer:

The Karankawa built portable homes because they were nomads or people who moved from place to place looking for food and resources. Also a primary characteristic of a Karankawa home was that it was temporary, portable or both. ... Portable or temporary homes made life easier for the tribes, because they moved around so they were always living in an area where food and resources were plentiful.

Answer: Jesus tells Nicodemus: “God did not send his Son into the world for him to judge the world.” This means that he was not sent to judge it adversely.

Explanation: "How can a man be born when he is old?" Nicodemus asked. "Surely he cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb to be born!" Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit.

(sorry that's all i got hope it was useful at least)

Answer:

(most r my own words)

Jesus told Nicodemus that it is possible to be born again. This news confused Nicodemus, if somebody told you that it is possible to be born again, I’m sure you’d be confused too."How can a man be born when he is old?" Nicodemus asked. "Surely he cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb to be born!" Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. Now, how could somebody be born again?’’ It is difficult for Nicodemus to understand what Jesus is teaching him about the Kingdom. So Jesus explained his words a bit better. Jesus says: “Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so the Son of man must be lifted up, so that everyone believing in him may have everlasting life.”​ (John 3:14, 15.) What does this mean? To be ‘born again’ means to be saved and to gain faith in Jesus Christ. To be saved you need to be baptised.

Explanation:

Answer:

Democrat, Andrew Johnson was sympathetic to the South and wanted to remove many of the penalties against secession the Republicans had put forward. He had no sympathy for blacks either and one of his first moves was to virtually gut the Freedmen's Bureau of all its power. Basically, Johnson wanted to restore the property to the plantation owners, remove any restrictions and remove federal troops from the South. The Republicans wanted to make sure the rights of the newly freed former slaves were protected, to punish the secessionists, and provide steps for acceptance back into the Union (these varied according depending on whether it was Republicans or Radical Republicans).

Explanation:

Matching Column A (terms) with Column B (correct descriptions) is as follows:

Column A                      Column B

1. Hobbes                      Leviathan

2. Political theory         The study of the history of thoughts about

                                     government.

3. Fideism                     knowledge based on faith

4. Machiavelli               The Prince

5. Politics                      the process of man governing himself.

Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan (1651) theorizes that there exists a social contract whereby people make arrangements for how they are governed.

On the other hand, Machiavelli's theory in The Prince states that “the end justifies the means,” signifying a total lack of scruples in achieving one's goals.

Thus, The Prince has served as a political treatise for kings and rulers over the centuries in conjunction with Hobbes' Leviathan.

Learn more about political theories at https://brainly.com/question/26255653

Answer:

D

Explanation:

MILGRIM DID AN EXPERMINENT ON HUMANS ANDJSKSKSKSKAJSJAJ

Explanation:

The extent to which historical events and their consequences can be attributed to individual actions versus broader societal forces and structural factors is a complex and debated topic in historical analysis. Different historians may have different perspectives and emphasize different factors depending on their theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and interpretations of historical evidence. Here are some key points to consider:

Individual Actions:

1. Great individuals and their actions: Some historical events can be significantly influenced by the actions and decisions of specific individuals who played pivotal roles. These individuals may have had unique qualities, skills, or leadership abilities that shaped the course of events.

2. Agency and contingency: Individual actions can introduce contingencies and unforeseen consequences that may alter the course of history. The decisions made by individuals can have ripple effects and shape the trajectory of events.

Societal Forces and Structural Factors:

1. Social, economic, and political structures: Broader societal forces such as economic systems, political ideologies, social hierarchies, and cultural norms can shape the possibilities and constraints within which individuals operate. These structural factors can influence the choices available to individuals and impact the outcomes of historical events.

2. Collective actions and movements: Historical events often arise from collective actions and movements driven by societal forces such as revolutions, social movements, or shifts in public opinion. These movements are fueled by the actions and collaboration of many individuals, highlighting the significance of collective agency.

3. Long-term trends and systemic factors: Structural factors can shape long-term trends and historical developments. Factors like technological advancements, demographic changes, and geopolitical shifts can have profound impacts that transcend individual actions.

It is important to recognize that historical events are often the result of a complex interplay between individual actions and broader societal forces. The relative influence of these factors may vary depending on the specific context, the scale of analysis, and the specific event being studied. Historians strive to understand and evaluate the interactions between individual agency and structural forces to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of historical events.

Answer:Most historians of sociology agree that the historical event that lead to the establishment of sociology was the Industrial Revolution. However, the French Revolution also played a critical part in the establishment of sociology.

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is New Mexico.

Explanation:

The first map shows the main Native American cultural regions in the United States, including the Southwest region. The second map specifically highlights the states that were part of the Southwest region, which includes Arizona, New Mexico, part of Utah, and part of Colorado.

The options are:

New Mexico - Correct. The map shows New Mexico as part of the Southwest region.

Florida - Incorrect. Florida is not shown as part of the Southwest region.

Ohio - Incorrect. Ohio is not shown as part of the Southwest region.

North Dakota - Incorrect. North Dakota is not shown as part of the Southwest region.

Therefore, based on the maps provided, New Mexico was located in the Southwest Native American cultural region.

Answer:

D. They dammed streams to create reservoirs

Explanation:

Lewis and Clark (first inhabitants) did it

Columbus did it

Sacajewya did it....

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Words We Hear

The first way God speaks is the one that’s most often associated with hearing his voice: words we hear. While we would all love to hear an ‘audible’ voice, hearing God’s voice speak in this way appears somewhat rare and particularly reserved for those moments when we’re about to step out into the traffic! The word ‘audible’ itself may indeed be a misnomer – according to my doctoral research, most of those who have experienced it, say it would not have been heard by those around them (See Waiting for God to Speak Out Loud? Think Again). Mostly it seems, the Spirit speaks to us inaudibly and internally – with a message that sounds much like our own thoughts – i.e the ‘still small voice’ of Elijah’s experience (1 Kings 19:9-13).

When God speaks in words, he may give us a single phrase or he may use full sentences. He may use a wordplay (eg. Jeremiah 1:11-12) or give us a riddle that calls us to ponder (Numbers 12:8). Often he’ll ask a question to get us thinking (1 Kings 19:9, 2 Chronicles 1:7) and as the conversation continues, he reveals something more significant later on.

2. Pictures We See

The second way God speaks is in pictures that we see. As God said through the prophet Jeremiah; “Which of them has stood in the council of the Lord to see or to hear his word?” (Jeremiah 23:18, italics mine). We hear his message through words, but we see his message through pictures.

At first, this may seem an unusual way to speak, but we need to remember picture language is the most basic of languages. When children first learn to read, we give them a picture book to practise with – not the Oxford Dictionary. Further, imagery is the most expressive way to communicate which is why it is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. Perhaps this is why God communicates in this way so often in the Scriptures, particularly in the Old Testament where dreams and visions comprise ⅓ of the content (Read: Dreams – God’s Favourite Form of Communication).

When God speaks in pictures, his message comes in dreams when we’re sleeping or visions when we’re awake. Sometimes the picture speaks symbolically and requires interpretation (see for example; The Meaning of Vehicles in Dreams). Other times, the scene is more literal.

Sometimes God’s visual messages are full of riddles, poetry and allegorical forms that are not easily interpreted or measurable. These can be compared to the parables of Jesus which use images or scenes to communicate an idea. Walton suggests that the reason word pictures are used by God is to engage the right side of our brains.1 (This idea was touched on in the podcast: Are Women Better at Hearing God’s Voice?)

Communication in picture form is a way of speaking that the Western church often finds difficult to accept. Writers like Dallas Willard2 and Wayne Grudem3 have gone so far to say it is not a valid way to hear God’s voice. The reasons are primarily historical – an unfortunate product of Reformation thinking that downplayed the so-called mystical forms of spiritual experience. In fact, imagery is the most common form of communication in the Scriptures and can be the most powerful and creative way of all (Read Why God Speaks in Dreams and Visions or listen to this podcast as an example).

3. Emotions We Feel

Finally, God’s messages may come packaged as emotions we feel. In other words, we sense what God is saying to us. The emotion of the Holy Spirit is felt physically and this in itself communicates a message.

So the presence of hope may invade us, comforting us and calling us forward (Galatians 5:22-23, 1 Corinthians 14:3). Peace becomes a guide to lead us (Colossians 3:15) and a deep-seated conviction may turn us around (John 16:8). A friend of mine with a ministry in healing often experiences a sense of sadness when she meets someone who the Holy Spirit wants to touch in a profound way.

One of the reasons why dreams can be such powerful communicators is because the emotion we experience in them becomes part of the message. Daniel felt deep anguish when he first experienced his visions (Daniel 10:1-9), John found himself weeping (Revelation 5:4) and Peter was revulsed by what he had seen in his trance (Acts 10:14). Of course on the other hand, feelings of guilt, shame, fear or condemnation are never a part of God’s communiqués to us.

So God speaks to us in words, pictures and emotions. There are other forms too – although these are not as common. In my doctoral studies, I’ve interviewed people who have heard from the Holy Spirit through the senses of taste and smell! God packages his message to us in a myriad of forms. He is a masterful communicator who knows how to get his message across to those who are listening.