what is inter personal relationship
a mental illness causing one to think falsely that there is a conspiracy and that somebody is out to kill them is called?
a] depression
b] malingering
c] psychosis
d] schizophrenia
Who Was First King Of Nepal
Answer:
Explanation:
The first king of Nepal was King Prithvi Narayan Shah. He was born on January 11, 1723, and ruled from 1768 until his death in 1775. King Prithvi Narayan Shah was the founder of the modern Kingdom of Nepal and the Shah dynasty, which ruled Nepal until 2008 when the country became a federal democratic republic. He is widely regarded as a unifying figure and is credited with the unification of Nepal and the establishment of Nepal as a sovereign kingdom.
PLEASE HELP QUICK!!
Describe a scenario where a property owner might argue that his property is being “taken” from him by a local government because of a restriction that is put on the land. Now describe what the competing “public use” of the restriction would be.
A quarrel may be formulated by a landowner directing the dispute at the local government if they impose a zoning decree, namely if it restrains the use of his property.
What is an example?For instance, when the district decides to use it exclusively for residential purposes, the owner may feel he is being shortchanged on its value and actual utilization.
Conversely, an affirmatory case from the "public benefit" viewpoint could maintain that such regulation is essential for maintaining the safety, health, and welfare of everyone in the area.
These rules seek to reconcile the rights of personal ownership with general communal benefit through organized and productive land use, countering overcrowding, and impeding any types of nuisance or potentially perilous pursuits.
Read more about property rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/9052855
#SPJ1
What issues does article 1 of the constitution deal with
Answer:
Article I describes the design of the legislative branch of US Government -- the Congress. Important ideas include the separation of powers between branches of government (checks and balances), the election of Senators and Representatives, the process by which laws are made, and the powers that Congress has.
Write an essay:
Why has there been a rise in crime in our country and what can law enforcement do to reduce it?
The rise in crime in South Africa, high levels of poverty and inequality, unemployment, social disintegration, substance abuse, inadequate education and social support systems, and weak law enforcement and criminal justice systems.
How to reduce crime in South Africa ?To curtail crime, law enforcement agencies can employ a range of strategies. First and foremost, they can prioritize community policing approaches, fostering collaborations with local communities to cultivate trust, enhance communication, and collaborate on crime prevention initiatives.
This entails engaging community members actively, establishing neighborhood watch programs, and implementing outreach initiatives to tackle underlying social issues.
Find out more on South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/31152480
#SPJ1
Is it unconstitutional for a state to arrest you for protesting? Isn't freedom of speech your right?
Answer:
if it is a peaceful protest and you are doing nothing but saying what you have to say then you are fine but if what you call "peaceful protesting" is burning down innocent peoples buildings that they have worked hard for and that was their life and burning bibles and destroying statues and burning flags then you are very wrong and should be punished for that.
Explanation:
Which numbered pair of phrases best completes this diagram of the
presidential impeachment process?
1
Two-thirds of
the Senate votes
to convict the
president
A. (1) The vice president requests that the president be impeached.
(2) The president must appoint a replacement
B. (1) The House votes to impeach the president. (2) The president is
removed from office.
c. (1) At least half of all state legislatures vote to impeach the
president (2) The House selects a new president
D. (1) The Supreme Court accuses the president of a crime. (2) The
president resigns from office,
Answer: The answer is B. (1) The House votes to impeach the president. (2) The president is removed from office.
The numbered pair of phrases which best completes this diagram of the presidential impeachment process is option 'B' (1) The House votes to impeach the president. (2) The president is removed from office. Thus, option 'B' is the correct option.
What is the presidential impeachment process?The Senate convenes as a High Court of Impeachment after receiving the articles of impeachment from the House of Representatives to review the evidence, hear testimony, and vote to exonerate or convict the accused person. Before the Senate, a group of members known as the "managers" serve as the prosecution. The chief justice of the United States presides over presidential impeachment cases.
According to the Constitution, a Senate conviction needs a two-thirds majority, and the punishment for an impeached person who is found guilty is their removal from office. The Senate has in certain situations also barred these individuals from holding future public office. No appeal is available. Since 1789, conviction and removal from office have occurred in nearly half of Senate impeachment cases.
Learn more about the presidential impeachment process, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28139119?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ5
Louise Pulsifer owned a farm that she wanted to sell and ran an ad in the local newspaperAfter Russell Gillespie agreed to purchase the farm , Pulsifer wrote him a letter stating that she would not sell it. He sued her to enforce the contract, and she raised the defense of the statute of frauds. The letter she had signed did not contain any of the terms of the sale. Gillespie, however, claimed that the newspaper ad could be combined with her letter to satisfy the statute of fraudsWas he correct?
If the owner doesn't sell the house, he can sue.
What Is the Frauds Statute?Several types of transactions are required to be in writing in accordance with a legal doctrine known as the statute of frauds. The transactions that are most typically covered by the statute of frauds include contracts lasting a year or more, agreements involving goods worth more than $500, and the sale of property..
The statute of frauds' goal is to stop fraud and other wrongdoing. These goals are frequently referred to as evidential and cautionary. The statute of frauds serves as evidence by offering proof of the existence of a valid, binding contract. The statute of fraud's cautionary purpose is to encourage each party to be more careful, intent, and serious in their dealings.
To know about frauds statute visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6806950
#SPJ1
Outline the main issues which human authors of the Bible concerned themselves with
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bible is a complex collection of texts that were written by various authors over a period of centuries. However, there are several overarching themes and issues that human authors of the Bible concerned themselves with, including:
The nature and character of God: Many authors of the Bible sought to describe and understand the nature and character of God, including his attributes such as holiness, justice, mercy, and love. They also explored the relationship between God and humanity, including the concept of covenant and the consequences of disobeying God.
Human sin and its consequences: The Bible also addresses the issue of human sin and its consequences, including the need for redemption and salvation. The authors describe how sin entered the world and how it separates humans from God, as well as the various ways in which God has provided a path to forgiveness and reconciliation.
The role of community and society: The Bible also addresses the role of community and society in shaping human behaviour and the consequences of both individual and collective actions. The authors explore issues such as justice, mercy, compassion, and the importance of caring for the marginalized and oppressed.
Prophecy and eschatology: Many authors of the Bible also engaged in prophecy and eschatology, or the study of the end times. They predicted future events and the ultimate destiny of humanity, often invoking apocalyptic imagery and symbolism.
Spiritual growth and personal transformation: Finally, the Bible addresses the issue of spiritual growth and personal transformation, emphasizing the importance of faith, prayer, and spiritual discipline. The authors describe the process of sanctification or becoming more like God, and the various challenges and obstacles that individuals may face in their spiritual journeys.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
i need a mitigating factor case plz
Which is not a skill related to physical fitness?
Answer: Zipper test is not a Physical test that is used for improving skill-related components
Explanation: hope this helps
Marijuana in its herbal form, is a psychoactive product of the plant Cannabis sativa. true or false
The statement" Marijuana in its herbal form, is a psychoactive product of the plant Cannabis sativa" is true.
What is Marijuana?
Marijuana which is also known as weed is a cannabis plant that can be harmful to the body.
Some of the side effect of Marijuana are:
It can increases in heart rateIt can cause drowsinessIt can lead to gastrointestinal disturbances etc.Therefore the statement is True.
Learn more about Marijuana here:https://brainly.com/question/8354517
#SPJ1
Should juveniles be charged as an adult when they commit murder? Why?
Answer:
yes because they still commit the crime
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
if they committed something wrong they should be
form 3
In what two ways can an amendment to the U.S. Constitution be proposed?
Answer:
natesha
Explanation:
What political view was formed from the Mayflower Compact?"
Answer:The Mayflower Compact continued the idea of law made by the people. This idea lies at the heart of democracy.
Explanation:
List 3 of Preserve Evidence law
Answer: appropriate packaging with correct and consistent information on labeling and procedural documentation for all items. Biological evidence should be air-dried before packaging to minimize degradation.
Explanation:
what is the law of conservation
What amendment gives people the right to peacefully protest.
Answer:
The 1st Amendment
Explanation:
This is the CORE of the first amendment, and is influenced in many movements of the United States; BLM, LGBTQ, etc.
plzz answer my question its urgent plzz
Answer:This is what I know
Explanation:
Laws are never respected nor unforced in India. Indians follow all rules and laws when they are in a foreign country in the Western world. However, when they are in India, they usually don’t follow Indian laws. There are several reasons for Indians are not following the rules in India like
1: Lenient Laws-The Indian laws are extremely lenient and flexible. Often the penalty for violating the law is so low that it would be profitable to break the law.
2:Poor enforcement-The enforcement of law is quite poor due to shortage of government officials, corruption and slow justice delivery system. Even when a case is booked against the offender, it takes several years for the culprit to bring to justice.
3: Wrong role model-The leaders and top officials in India are often the first people to break the law. They even take pride of doing so. That set a wrong example before the common people in India who follow their footsteps.
How many cabinet positions does the President of the USA appoint?
15
27
10
21
Any act or omission of an act that is prohibited and punishable by federal,state or local statute.
Answer:
Breaking the law/Crime
Answer:
if you Break a law or do a crime
Explanation:
Under the 4th Amendment, the police
can NOT do which of the following?
A. Search your vehicle for drugs if they see them in plain
sight during a traffic stop.
B. Search your home with a warrant signed by a judge.
C. Search your home for evidence of a crime with no
warrant.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Its C because if the police search your of a crime with no warrant the police cant search any premisis with a warant
Answer: C
Explanation:
Under the 4th Amendment, law enforcement cannot search personal property (for example, home, vehicle, etc.) without a warrant.
A jury convicted two defendants for crimes involving the transportit
aliens. After the trial was over, the federal judge in the case enforced a court rule
that prohibited anyone from interviewing any juror, relative, friend, or associate
of the juror regarding the deliberations or verdict of the jury unless the person
can show good cause. Two weeks after the verdict, a newspaper publisher and
reporter filed a motion to get permission to interview the jurors for a news story.
The court denied the motion.
The publisher and reporter filed a lawsuit, claiming that they have a right under
freedom of the press to gather news and that the denial of access to interview the
jurors violates that constitutional right.
The court defends its ruling and its order not to grant permission by stating that,
like other First Amendment rights, the right to gather news is not absolute. The
purpose of prohibiting interviews of the jury is to protect jurors from annoyance
and harassment. Additionally, freedom of debate and independence of thought
would be stifled if jurors were made to feel that their arguments and ballots were
to be freely published to the public.
The law requires that restrictions of the press's news-gathering rights must be
justified by a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to serve
that interest.
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. Who is the defendant?
3. What does the plaintiff want?
4. What does the defendant want?
5. What is the issue in this case?
What arguments does the plaintiff make?
The answer responses are:
The plaintiff in this case is the newspaper publisher and reporter.The defendant in this case is the court.The plaintiff wants permission to interview the jurors for a news story.The defendant wants to maintain its ruling and order not to grant permission to interview the jurors.The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff's right to gather news under the First Amendment of the US Constitution is being violated by the defendant's prohibition on interviewing jurors.What arguments does the plaintiff make?The plaintiff argues that they have a right under the freedom of the press to gather news and that the prohibition on interviewing jurors violates this right.
They may also argue that the prohibition is not justified by a compelling governmental interest and is not narrowly tailored to serve that interest, as required by law.
Therefore, the plaintiff may also argue that the prohibition is overly broad and unnecessarily restricts their ability to gather news.
Learn more plaintiff from
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ1
how do judges make decisions about legal cases
Answer:
Trials in criminal and civil cases are generally conducted the same way. After all the evidence has been presented and the judge has explained the law related to the case to a jury, the jurors decide the facts in the case and render a verdict. If there is no jury, the judge makes a decision on the case.
Explanation:
A newspaper article reported that a certain photographer, famous for his candid but unauthorized photos of celebrities, was “the most hated photographer” in town. The same article reported that his photographer had installed listening devices outside the homes of celebrities. The photographer sued the newspaper for defamation. At the trial, the newspaper called as witnesses several of the celebrities who testified about the listening devices (bugs) they had discovered.
PROBLEM 18.6
What should the photographer have to prove to win his defamation case?
In what way do you think the photographer was harmed by the article?
What defense, if any, might be available to the newspaper?
How should this case be decided? Give your reasons.
A newspaper is regarded as a type of communication that is used to share information about global happenings. This raises public awareness of the problems and difficulties facing the world and gives information about them.
In the given case, it highlighted a particular photographer, well-known for his unrestricted candid shots of celebrities where the photographer filed a case for defamation in order to defend himself.
Learn more about defamation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28196525
#SPJ1
If someone feels that their trial was not fair or was handled wrong, what is 5 points
the next step they can take in the judicial process? *
They can flee to another country and then declare a new trial.
They can ask for a Congressman to pardon them.
They can appeal to a higher court of law.
They can fire their lawyer and ask the judge for another trial,
Answer:
They can appeal to a higher court of law
Explanation:
Why was 16 thought to be an appropriate age to assign criminal responsibility? Should youth under eighteen he held in adult facilities during their trial?
Josue was pulled over for an illegal right-hand turn. After the police officers spoke with Josue, they believed they had reasonable suspicion that a crime
was about to take place. Consequently, Josue was asked to exit the vehicle to be patted down for weapons. Which police procedure did the officers
follow in this situation?
A. officer preservation
B.
stop and frisk
C. probable cause searching
traffic searching
D.
The procedure that the police officers used in the situation, to ask Josue to exit the vehicle was C. probable cause searching
What is probable cause ?Probable cause is a legal standard that must be met before law enforcement officers can make an arrest, conduct a search, or take other similar actions. It refers to a level of suspicion that is based on facts and circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that a crime has been committed, or that certain evidence of a crime will be found in a specific place.
This standard is used to protect citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, and is an essential element of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
This is therefore what the police officers used in asking Josue to exit the vehicle for searching.
Find out more on probable cause at https://brainly.com/question/28399684
#SPJ1
CHAPTER 3 THE CONSTITUION
SECTION 1 THE SIX BASIC PRINCIPALS
Explain the principle of the Federalism?
Answer: Federalism is a system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government. Both the national government and the smaller political subdivisions have the power to make laws and both have a certain level of autonomy from each other.
Answer:
6 basic principles of the US Constitution
The six underlying principles of the Constitution are popular sovereignty, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and limited government.
Explanation: Hope this helps