What are the many roles of the president? The roles the president holds are chief of state, chief executive, commander in chief, chief diplomat, and chief legislator. 1) As the chief of state, the president holds power as the ceremonial head of the government, which gives him national exposure and increases popularity (helps deal with Congress). 2) As the chief executive, the president's role is to enforce acts of Congress, judgments of federal courts, and treaties signed by the US. He carries out duties. He also has the power to grant reprieves and pardons. 3) As the commander in chief, the president is the civilian head of the military. He does not actually lead troops to battle. His role is to keep the brief case which contains the codes necessary for nuclear attack. 4) As the chief diplomat, the president's role is to recognize foreign government, make treaties, and executive agreements. He has the diplomatic recognition to acknowledge a foreign government as legitimate. 5) As the chief legislator, the role of the president is to influence the making of laws. The president helps set the policy agenda for the nation through his State of the Union Message that the Constitution requires him to give each year (message is addressed to people of the world, American people, & Congress).
Answers
The roles which the president of the country holds are chief of state, chief diplomat, chief executive, commander in chief, and chief legislator.
The president of the country, as the chief of state, basically is the ceremonial head of the government. As the chief executive, the president can enforce the judgments of the federal courts, the acts of the Congress, as well as the treaties which are being signed signed by the United State of America. As the commander in chief of USA, the president is considered as the civilian head of the military.
The president, as the chief diplomat, basically has the power to be able to make treaties, recognize the foreign government, as well as the executive agreements. The role of the president as the chief legislator is to be able to influence the making of the laws of the country.
To know more about president
https://brainly.com/question/16605021
#SPJ4
--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is,
"What are the many roles of the president?"--
Related Questions
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Estimates Committee?
Choose the correct statements given below.
A
1 only
B
2 only
C
Both 1 and 2
D
Neither 1 nor 2
Answers
The Committee on Estimates is not an ad hoc committee but a standing committee of the Parliament. On the other hand, the Committee on Railway Convention is not a standing committee but an ad hoc committee of the Parliament. Therefore, the correct option (D)
The origin of this committee can be traced back to the pre-independence era to the standing finance committee set up in 1921.As mentioned in the then-finance minister John Mathai's speech presenting the 1950-51 budget, the first estimate committee in the post-independence era was formed in 1950 on his advice.The Estimate Committee had 25 members at first, but that number increased to 30 in 1956.It is a type of financial commitment in the constitution of India. It is one of the permanent standing committees. Hence, Statement 1 is not correct.All the 30 members are from Loksabha onlyRajya Sabha has no representation in this committee.Members are elected every year from amongst Lok Sabha members according to the principle of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. Thus all parties get due representation in the committee.Hence the correct statement D
Learn more about Rajya Sabha
https://brainly.com/question/17331973
#SPJ11
Full Question: Which of the following statements is/are correct?
1. Committee on Estimates is an ad hoc committee of the Parliament.
2. Committee on Railway Convention is a standing committee of the Parliament.
Select the correct answer using the code given below: 100 word
Choose the correct statements given below.
A
1 only
B
2 only
C
Both 1 and 2
D
Neither 1 nor 2
The statement that is correct regarding the Estimates Committee is:Both 1 and 2.What is the Estimates Committee?The Estimates Committee is one of the largest and most important parliamentary committees.
Its primary goal is to examine the estimates that the executive submits to Parliament each year and submit reports to the House. Members of Parliament examine the financial estimates made by the government in the budgets and take appropriate measures. Below are some correct statements regarding the Estimates Committee:The committee was first created in 1921 to examine the budget estimates. The committee is made up of thirty members, and the chairman is always a member of the opposition.
To know more about Estimates visit
https://brainly.com/question/33016179
#SPJ11
why agency by estoppel forces a principal to be bound by an unauthorized contract.
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.
The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.
For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.
In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
ILL GIVE YOU 10 POINTSS
Answers
Answer:
you take from me
ghdhdhdufufuufuf
Essay help! Advance Criminal Justice Class...
What does Ruggiero (and others like him) mean when they express the sentiment
that “Terrorism is what the other person does; what we do is anti-terrorism” and
suggests that this sentiment ought to be the basis of all critical criminology and that
for many reasons political violence theory ought to at least study the other point of
view because terrorists might turn out in the flow of history to be in the right? If this
can be assumed true, what are the theoretical implications that flow from this (that
terrorists might be right) and what are those other reasons for this new direction
criminology might take on terrorism and other crime?
Answers
Ruggiero also suggests that political violence theory ought to study the other point of view because it is possible that terrorists might turn out to be in the right. This is an important point because it challenges the dominant narrative that terrorists are always wrong and that state violence is always justified. By studying the other point of view, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the complex political and social factors that lead to political violence.
The theoretical implications that flow from this are that we need to challenge our assumptions about what is and is not criminal. We need to recognize that the definition of crime is not fixed or objective, but is shaped by power dynamics and political interests. We need to be critical of the ways in which the state uses the label of terrorism to justify its own violence, and we need to be open to the possibility that non-state actors might have legitimate grievances that are not being addressed through conventional political channels.
The other reasons for this new direction criminology might take on terrorism and other crime include the need to develop a more nuanced understanding of the root causes of political violence, the need to challenge dominant narratives about terrorism and crime, and the need to develop more effective strategies for preventing and responding to political violence.
why structural functionalism a major perspective on deviance and crime
-sociology
Answers
Answer:i dont know really
Explanation:
True or False: Drivers on unpaved roads must always yield the right-of-way to drivers on paved roads.
a) True
b) False
Answers
The statement ''that drivers on unpaved roads must always yield the right-of-way to drivers on paved roads'' is false. So, the correct choice is option B.
The right-of-way rules are not determined based on the type of road surface. Instead, right-of-way rules prioritize the safety and efficiency of traffic flow in various situations, regardless of whether the road is paved or unpaved.
Right-of-way rules typically consider factors such as traffic signs, traffic signals, intersection configurations, and specific driving scenarios to determine which driver has the right to proceed first. These rules are meant to ensure orderly and safe movement of vehicles on the roads.
While it is true that in some situations, drivers on unpaved roads may be required to yield the right-of-way, it is not an absolute rule that always applies. The specific circumstances and applicable traffic laws or regulations dictate who has the right-of-way in a given situation, regardless of the road surface type.
It is important for all drivers to be familiar with and follow the right-of-way rules applicable in their jurisdiction to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow. Hence, the correct option is B (False).
For more questions on unpaved roads
https://brainly.com/question/31939162
#SPJ8
Audrey was granted stock appreciation rights in 10,000 shares of company stock when the share price was $50. If she exercised her rights when the share price was $70, how much income, if any, must she recognize at that time?
Answers
The income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Audrey will earn $200000 if she sells all the shares when the share price is $70 because there is $20 increase occur from the time when she receives the share until now. When she receives the share, its price is $50.
But after sometime when the share price increases and reaches up to $70 so we can conclude that the income of Audrey is $200000 after an increase of share from $50 to $70.
Learn more about shares here: https://brainly.com/question/1957305
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/26058343
stopping mail services and locking all windows and doors are typical items on a
Answers
Answer: very expensive store
Explanation:
lab 14-1 which rule of the federal rules of civil procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports?
Answers
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires expert witnesses to submit written reports.
The rule states that an expert witness must provide a written report detailing the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify. The report must include a complete statement of all the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify, the reasons for the opinions, any exhibits to be used as evidence, and the qualifications of the witness.
The report must be provided at least 90 days before the trial date, and the expert must be available for deposition prior to trial. The expert's report must be signed, dated, and served on all parties in the case.
To know more about Federal , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14858877
#SPJ4
Plzz help
Which two sentences in the scenario show
some of the symptoms of stress among law
enforcement, correctional, and public
security workers?
1, Not only has she started drinking copious
amounts of alcohol, but she's also started
smoking excessively.
2, Ruiz put on a charming and witty façade
at a recent family dinner to quell her
parents' worries about her.
3, It's become impossible for her to get a
good night's sleep-she fears she's
developing insomnia.
4, However, Ruiz is still hopeful. She's
planning to visit her counselor to improve
her mental and physical health.
Answers
Answer:
Not only has she started drinking copious amounts of alcohol, but she's also started smoking excessively
Forensic databases are maintained for all of the following EXCEPT: a. Fingerprints b. Dental impressions. c. DNA. d. Automotive paint.
Answers
Forensic databases are maintained for all of the following except Automotive paint. The correct option is (d).
Forensic databases are maintained for various types of evidence to assist in criminal investigations and identification. The commonly maintained forensic databases include fingerprints, dental impressions, and DNA. These databases are used to match and compare the collected evidence with known samples to establish links between suspects, victims, and crime scenes. However, forensic databases do not typically include automotive paint as a category for matching and identification purposes.
Thus, the ideal selection is option (d).
Learn more about Forensic database here:
https://brainly.com/question/32284533
#SPJ4
citi group 2 which of the following proposed studies would constitute human subjects research as defined under the federal regulations?
Answers
Studies that involve collecting survey data from people, interviewing participants, or observing public behavior would constitute human subjects research.
The federal regulations provide a broader definition of human subjects research, which includes the following:
Research that engages human subjects directly or indirectlyObtaining identifiable private information about living individualsResearch involving the use of human biological specimensResearch involving the use of intervention or interaction with the individual
Learn more about human subjects research at https://brainly.com/question/29675595
#SPJ11
What social, political, economic, and environmental issues have meaning and value
to you as a student and as a citizen? Why are these concerns important to you?
Answers
The environmental issue that has meaning and value to me is climate change.
Climate change simply refers to the long-term shifts in the temperature and weather pattern. Climate change can be a result of variations in the solar cycle or human activities.
Climate change brings about an alteration in temperature. It can be due to fossil fuels, deforestation, etc. Therefore, it's important for individuals to engage in activities that won't have a negative impact on the environment.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/21280235
A Texas “Under 21” ID or Driver's License cannot be used as proof of age.
Answers
Answer:
i think its false to be honest....sorry if incorrect
Check the "under 21 Until" date and as long as the date of birth shows the customer's age to be 21 years or older and the Driver's License is still valid, it is a valid ID to purchase alcohol.
Explanation:
sorry if this is wrong
but
Texas law does not state that a person over the age of 21 must provide proof of age for alcohol purchases. There is no specific form of ID considered “valid” under state law. You will not be charged with a crime if the minor misrepresents his / her age with an ID that is: Issued by a government agency.
Were prosecutors influenced in their decision by Mayweather's wealth and fame? Did Mayweather benefit from hiring expensive, prominent attorneys to defend him?
Answers
which government agency is in charge of enforcing advertising laws?
Answers
In the United States, the government organization in charge of upholding advertising regulations Commission (FTC). The FTC is an independent group tasked with defending consumers from misleading advertising
What is the role of the FTC, or Federal Trade Commission?Federal customer protection laws are enforced by the FTC to stop fraud, deceit, and unfair competition. Additionally, the Commission upholds federal antitrust laws, which forbid anticompetitive merger and acquisition and other commercial activities that might result in higher costs, fewer options, or less innovation.
What exactly is the FTC, or Federal Trade Commission?The Federal Trade Commissioner (FTC) is a federal govt organization founded in 1914 to stop unfair, dishonest, or anticompetitive business practices. According to its definition, the FTC has two goals: (1) to protect consumers, and (2) to advance
To know more about FTC visit:
https://brainly.com/question/23015428
#SPJ4
An implied contract may result from statements found in employee handbooks or other employment documants.
A. True
B. False
Answers
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
A contract is a signed agreement between an employer and an employee stating various ground rules as terms of employment. This is a signed and official documentation that holds both parties in an agreement.
An implied contract, on the other hand, is not a written or verbally spoken contract but is based on the actions of the parties involved. It is still legally binding and is a form of agreement between the concerned parties. And so, it can also be a result of any statements found in an employee's handbook or other employment documents.
Thus, the answer is true.
scott is a rude person . this tells us that his character does not include trait honesty, generosity,loyalty or politeness
Answers
Answer:
Politeness
Explanation:
If someone is rude, they are generally considered unpolite. This does not speak to their loyalty, honesty, or generosity.
What is the concept of Death Penalty in Islam?
Answers
Benny was arrested by New York Police and charged with the armed robbery of a taxicab driver. While Benny was in jail waiting for his trial, a New York undercover officer was placed in Benny’s cell. Before the officer asked any questions, Benny said that he had robbed the cab driver. Benny’s statement was used against him at trial, despite his objection that he was not read his Miranda Rights, in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
Question: Should the court allow Benny’s statement to be used in court?
Answers
The United States Postal Inspection Service was created to prevent _____. A. people from sending mail without proper postage B. the national mail system from being used for criminal or illegal purposes C. Protecting mail carriers from inadvertently delivering toxic material D. United States Marshals from policing the postal system
It is B
Answers
Answer:
B. the national mail system from being used for criminal or illegal purposes.
Explanation:
The United States Postal Inspection Service is a federal law enforcement sector of the posting service that inspects and makes sure that the mail system is used in a fair and safe manner. This process safeguards the general public from any harm and also ensures the mail system from any illegal or dangerous activity.
Thus, the correct answer is that the US Postal Inspection Service was created so that the national mail system will not be used for any criminal or illegal purposes and also to safeguard people from any harm.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Which agency performs the evaluation of prisoner\'s fitness and qualifications for the grant of pardon or parole
a.
Retribution, Deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation
b.
Punishment, confinement retribution, treatment
c.
None of the above
d.
Deterrence, retribution, punishment treatment
Answers
The agency that performs the evaluation of prisoner's fitness and qualifications for the grant of pardon or parole uses d. Deterrence, retribution, punishment treatment
What is used to treat prisoners ?The evaluation process for parole or pardon typically takes into consideration a variety of factors, including the prisoner's behavior and conduct while incarcerated, their history of criminal activity, their risk of reoffending, and their potential for rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
The specific factors and criteria used by the agency may vary by jurisdiction and by individual case.
Find out more on prisoners at https://brainly.com/question/14348844
#SPJ1
What are the guiding principles for first responders' to take when arriving at a potential crime scene?
Answers
During a trial, a witness (Heidi) claims that the defendant couldn’t have committed the crime because she was with the defendant all day. The prosecution receives a note from their assistant that says "Heidi is complicit. " What is the note suggesting? A. Heidi was a victim of the defendant’s crimes. B. Heidi is helping the defendant get away with the crime. C. Heidi is being blackmailed by the defendant to lie in court. D. Heidi actually doesn’t know anything about the defendant’s crimes
Answers
While presenting their case, the prosecutor must establish all components of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. must demonstrate that the accused stole something from a retailer.
When is guilt established beyond a reasonable doubt?The burden of proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal proceeding rests on the prosecution. The prosecution must persuade the jury, in other words, that the evidence in the case cannot be explained by any other logical explanation.
Why does reasonable doubt matter?A doubt that is supported by logic and common sense, as opposed to pure guesswork, is considered to be reasonable. It may result from a careful and unbiased evaluation of all the evidence or from a lack thereof.
To know more about prosecutor visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30404247
#SPJ1
EXPLAIN IT PLS HELP HELP HELP
Answers
The above statement outlines the penalties and administrative sanctions that will be imposed on individuals who violate the Doctrine. The penalties will be in accordance with the Revised Penal Code, RA 6713, RA 3019, and other special laws.
What constitutes the penalties?For violations that require administrative action, the appropriate punishment will be based on the rules and regulations set forth by the PNP (Philippine National Police), NAPOLCOM (National Police Commission), Civil Service Commission, and DILG (Department of the Interior and Local Government).
In summary, the penalties will depend on the severity of the offense and may range from administrative sanctions to criminal charges.
learn more about administrative sanctions: https://brainly.com/question/29635798
#SPJ1
The question in text format:
Penalties and Administrative Sanctions
The penalties for the commission of acts/practices in violation of this Doctrine shall be in accordance with the Revised Penal Code, RA 6713, RA 3019, and other special laws.
For acts or omissions which merely require administrative sanctions, the applicable punishments as provided for by the rules and regulations promulgated by the PNP, NAPOLCOM, Civil Service Commission, and DILG shall be applied.
Explain the above
Question 2
Prior notice deposit means bank shall returns the deposited amount without need for notice from customer
А
True
B
False
Answers
You are an investigator who has been assigned a case of elder abuse.
The suspect has legal responsibility of care, custody, and control of his
elderly mother, who is a victim of Alzheimer's disease. The suspect
knows that the victim is prone to wandering aimlessly all hours of the
night and day. However, the suspect neglects to lock the doors on a
given night. The victim leaves the home around 2:00 a.m. and walks
down the center of a major highway adjacent to the home. The driver
of an approaching vehicle did not seen the victim soon enough to avoid
hitting the victim. The victim was pronounced dead at the scene. You
have been charged with the investigation to determine if the suspect
may have caused the situation to occur.
Question:
What will you have to prove to be able to develop probable cause in this
case?
Answers
The probable cause in the case here would be that : the following are determined
What is the probable causeAs an investigator, to develop probable cause in this case and determine if the suspect may have caused the situation to occur, the following elements will need to be proven:
The suspect had a legal responsibility of care, custody, and control of his elderly mother, who was a victim of Alzheimer's disease.
The suspect knew that the victim was prone to wandering aimlessly all hours of the night and day.
The suspect neglected to lock the doors on the night in question.
The victim left the home around 2:00 a.m. and walked down the center of a major highway adjacent to the home.
The driver of an approaching vehicle did not see the victim soon enough to avoid hitting the victim.
The victim was pronounced dead at the scene.
Based on these elements, it will be necessary to determine if the suspect's actions or inactions were the proximate cause of the victim's death. This will require a thorough investigation, including interviews with witnesses, review of any surveillance footage, and analysis of the suspect's past behavior and treatment of the victim. If there is evidence to suggest that the suspect's neglect or failure to take reasonable precautions led to the victim's death, then probable cause may exist to charge the suspect with elder abuse, neglect, or other related crimes.
Read more on legal responsibility here:https://brainly.com/question/23398960
#SPJ1
Drivers must understand that the traffic laws
Answers
Answer:
yeah they must understand the traffic laws.
hope it helps
stay safe healthy and happy..
Explanation:
Drivers must understand that traffic laws help them and should be supported and followed.
) According to Article 38.
Statute of the International Courts
of Justice (ICJ) Customary
International
Law,
General principles of
Law Recognize by civilized state and
Judicial decision are part of primary"
Sources of public international
Law? Discuss not
than 5 pages and support your answer with relevant authorities.
Answers
The Court will use international agreements, international customs, general principles of law recognized by civilized nations, etc. in order to settle any issues that are brought before it in conformity with international law.
What does Article 38 of the ICJ statute say?Three primary sources of international law are listed in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (SICJ).
International treaties of a general or specific character serve as the primary source. Second, if it can be proven that a particular customer has been recognized as law, it can serve as a source of law.
According to its statute, the International Court of Justice shall follow "general principles of law accepted by civilized nations."
This source has received both praise and criticism; it has been hailed as the solution to all problems with international law or even denied normative validity.
The teachings of highly competent publicists and court judgments, on the other hand, are classed as merely secondary sources.
The most important sources of international law are treaties, which are also the sole sources accessible to two or more States seeking to legally establish legal relations.
Customs are acknowledged as legal rules and represent the common practices of a State.
When a particular manner of acting is first seen as a normative practice among States and then acknowledged as binding by those States, international customary law enters the picture.
Unsurprisingly, the lack of a global "law creator" has made customs a crucial source of international law. All States are bound by customary law unless a State consistently protests.
Similarly to this, judges might turn to "universal principles of law recognized by civilized nations" as a beneficial resource when there is a lack of sufficiently stated law.
They were added to article 38 of the PCIJ Statute as "gap fillers" to provide for circumstances in which treaties and customs were insufficient to offer the necessary legal guidance.
On the other hand, Article 38(1) reflects subsidiary norms such as judicial rulings and academic publications.
On the former, it is acknowledged that court rulings do play a crucial role in ICJ decisions, despite article 59 of the Statute (which specifies that stare decisis is not a component of international law).
Reports from international law commissions have also been used by the ICJ.
Judges will only consult judicial decisions and academic publications when they are unsuccessful in finding authority in any of the other sources because they are secondary requirements.
Learn more about the International Courts of Justice (ICJ) below;
https://brainly.com/question/14337600
#SPJ1
an attorney works as in-house counsel for a large international corporation and has daily contact with higher-level executives and managers. one day, a senior executive mentions casually to the attorney that he has offered lucrative stock options, worth millions of dollars, to a foreign government official who has agreed to give the corporation an exclusive contract to provide certain goods and services to the foreign state. the executive seems to think this is normal and good for the company, but the attorney believes it constitutes bribery of foreign officials, which would violate the foreign corrupt practices act (fcpa) and could subject the corporation to enormous fines and penalties. the attorney explains her concerns to the executive, including that the executive could face personal criminal charges in addition to bringing liability on the corporation, and she reminds him that she represents the corporation, not him personally. the executive is dismissive of her concerns, even though she approaches him several times about the matter.
Answers
According to the given case, an attorney works as in-house counsel for a large international corporation and has daily contact with higher-level executives and managers.
One day, a senior executive mentions casually to the attorney that he has offered lucrative stock options, worth millions of dollars, to a foreign government official who has agreed to give the corporation an exclusive contract to provide certain goods and services to the foreign state. The executive seems to think this is normal and good for the company, but the attorney believes it constitutes bribery of foreign officials, which would violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and could subject the corporation to enormous fines and penalties.
The attorney explains her concerns to the executive, including that the executive could face personal criminal charges in addition to bringing liability on the corporation, and she reminds him that she represents the corporation, not him personally. The executive is dismissive of her concerns, even though she approaches him several times about the matter.The attorney's ethical responsibilities are clearly defined in the given scenario. The attorney is responsible for representing the corporation and its interests.
She is not responsible for the senior executive's personal interests. Therefore, the attorney must take steps to protect the corporation from any wrongdoing. The attorney must raise her concerns with the corporation's management and ensure that they take appropriate action to remedy the situation. If the senior executive continues to ignore her concerns, she must take steps to escalate the issue to higher management or the board of directors.
The attorney must also be aware of her ethical responsibilities and obligations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and ensure that the corporation complies with all relevant laws and regulations.
For more such questions on executives
https://brainly.com/question/18510919
#SPJ11