Under Rule 803(11) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, records of religious organizations concerning personal or family history are considered an exception to the hearsay rule.
A Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted and is generally inadmissible as evidence. However, Rule 803(11) permits the use of specific records as evidence even if they would otherwise be considered hearsay.
The rationale behind this exception is that records of religious organizations concerning personal or family history are generally reliable and trustworthy, as they are kept in the ordinary course of the organization's activities. Such records may include information about births, marriages, divorces, deaths, and other significant life events. These records can provide valuable evidence in legal proceedings related to family law, estate matters, and other areas where personal or family history is relevant.
To be admissible under Rule 803(11), the records must be: (1) a statement of birth, legitimacy, ancestry, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood or marriage, or similar facts of personal or family history; (2) made by a person with knowledge of the event or from information transmitted by such a person; and (3) contained in a regularly kept record of a religious organization. Additionally, it is required that the circumstances indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.
In summary, Rule 803(11) allows for the admissibility of records of religious organizations concerning personal or family history in legal proceedings, recognizing their reliability and importance in providing evidence of significant life events.
Know more about hearsay rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/30409366
#SPJ11
Zwane died intestate on 26 November 2021 and is survived by his wife Dudu to whom he was married according to Customary Law in 2011. They did not enter into an antenuptial contract and were married in community of property. At the time of Zwane’s death, Dudu was seven months pregnant with Zwane’s child, who they planned to call Bongani. Zwane is also survived by the following relatives:
(i) His son Joshua who renounced his rights to inherit;
(ii) His father Solly;
(iii) His younger sister Rose.
The joint estate is worth R900 000.00 (Nine Hundred Thousand Rand). How will Zwane’s estate devolve?
The way and manner that Zwane's estate would devolve under the Community of Property are that Dudu has the right to dispose of the joint estate as she wished.
What is the community of property work in South Africa?in South Africa, when a couple is married in a community of property and did not enter into an antenuptial or prenuptial agreement to exclude the community of property clause regarding their joint estate, each spouse can dispose of the assets as they wished.
By the time that Zwane died intestate, and applying the Community of Property clause, Dudu has the exclusive right to the devolution of the estate.
Thus, the manner that Zwane's estate would devolve under the Community of Property is that Dudu has the right to dispose of the joint estate as she wished.
Learn more about the community of property in South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/3669648
The state constitution provides the people the opportunity to directly vote on whether to accept or reject a proposed law. This is known as a.
People having the opportunity to directly vote on whether to accept or reject a proposed law is known as Referendum.
What is a Referendum?
A referendum is a ballot that is voted on by the general population of a city, county, or state. It means that a political question is passed on to the people to decide rather than a legislative body.
Referendums are not allowed at the federal level in the U.S. government, but state and local governments can use them. They are usually put on the general ballot during most elections. Referendums are one of several forms of exercising ''direct democracy.'' This is the governmental practice of operating according to the will of the people. Mostly, referendums and other forms of direct democracy are used to decide issues rather than to elect politicians.However, referendums are meant to repeal or affirm laws created by legislatures. Referendums are considered effective for overruling legislative decisions that are unpopular.The process of using a referendum is:
A state or local legislature comes to a policy decision, or a sufficient number of citizens propose a policy. Many times, proposals (or initiatives) are created by citizen interest groups, such as civil rights groups.
Policy decisions are offered to the people on a ballot (usually as part of a general election).
The popular vote is tallied, and the opinion of the majority is followed.
Learn more about Referendums here:
https://brainly.com/question/15604110
#SPJ4
the person who acquires real property under the terms of a will is known as a
Answer:
Devisee
Explanation:
Devisee is the term associated to the individual who is left with the real estate property according to the terms of the bill. A devisee may or may not be related with the decedent. It is because of the presence of devisee in the will of the decedent that the devisee receives the property and becomes the owner of it. In the case where the property is left with with the devisee becomes the owner.
Are Narcotics addictive
Answer:
yes very much so
Explanation:
dont do any
Can a private citizen be impeached?
A court decides to interpret a law in a way that encourages the limitation of a judge's power. The court relies on similar past rulings and stays very close to the literal meaning of the Constitution in its approach. This court is engaging in judicial
Answer:
interpretation
Explanation:
Judicial interpretation may be defined as the various ways by which the judiciary utilizes its power to interpret the law, especially legislation and constitutional documents. By this power, the court can overturn the law passed by the legislation of a country.
When the court wishes to interpret a law it is known as judicial interpretation.
D. precedent.
edge 2021
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
What do candidate centered elections look like?
Answer:
Elections centered on candidates and not on political parties have characteristics that make them particular and give them their own imprint. Thus, these elections are based not on general political platforms but on particular ideologies, which develop personalisms and political positions that are dangerous at times, given that they do not have the support (or responsibility) of organized groups such as political parties behind them.
In other cases, these types of elections have political parties actively participating and supporting each of the candidates, as was the case in the 2016 elections in the United States between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, but even so, the candidates end having a greater predominance than that of the political parties.
How does electricity get to our house?
Answer:The electrical charge goes through high-voltage transmission lines that stretch across the country. It reaches a substation, where the voltage is lowered so it can be sent on smaller power lines. ... The electricity travels through wires inside the walls to the outlets and switches all over your house.
Explanation:
1. What is the importance, if any, of officer intent and motive in the "objective standard of reasonable force" under the current state of the law?
The importance of officer intent and motive in the "objective standard of reasonable force" under the current state of the law can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case.
However, it is generally recognized that the objective standard focuses on the perspective of a reasonable officer in the same situation, rather than the subjective intent or motive of the individual officer involved. Here's a further explanation:Objective Standard of Reasonable Force: The objective standard of reasonable force is a legal principle used to assess whether a law enforcement officer's use of force was justified under the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. It considers what a reasonable officer, with similar training and experience, would have done in the same circumstances.
Focus on Objective Factors: When determining the reasonableness of force, courts typically focus on the objective facts known to the officer at the time of the incident. This includes factors such as the severity of the alleged crime, the threat posed by the suspect, and whether the suspect actively resisted or posed a danger to others.
Subjective Intent and Motive: While officer intent and motive can be relevant in certain legal contexts, such as determining the officer's state of mind or assessing potential constitutional violations, they are generally not given significant weight in the objective reasonableness analysis of the use of force. The focus is primarily on the reasonableness of the officer's actions based on the circumstances known to them at the time, rather than the officer's personal motives or subjective intent.
Qualified Immunity and Objective Reasonableness: Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that shields government officials, including law enforcement officers, from liability for civil damages under certain circumstances. To determine if an officer is entitled to qualified immunity, courts typically consider whether the officer's conduct violated clearly established constitutional rights as determined by the objective reasonableness standard. This analysis is focused on the objective facts rather than the officer's subjective intent.
Learn more about officer Visit: brainly.com/question/29668617
#SPJ11
What is pre-clearance? Which law was it instated under? Which Supreme Court case essentially undermined preclearance and requires congressional action to allow it to operate?
Pre-clearance refers to a process in the United States that required certain jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting practices to obtain federal approval or "pre-clearance" before making any changes to their voting laws or procedures.
The purpose of pre-clearance was to prevent discriminatory voting practices and protect the voting rights of minority communities.
The pre-clearance requirement was established under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). The VRA was a landmark federal law that aimed to overcome barriers to voting faced by African Americans and other minority groups.
The Supreme Court case that undermined pre-clearance and required congressional action to allow it to operate was Shelby County v. Holder (2013).
Learn more about Pre-clearance here:
https://brainly.com/question/31446528
#SPJ4
Compare and contrast the major aspects of Crime Scene Technology discussed.
Investigators unearth physical evidence to assist establish what happened and who was involved by conducting a systematic examination of the crime scene. This process must be carried out carefully and extensively to ensure that critical evidence is captured while fragile evidence is not destroyed.
The case investigator and crime scene employees collaborate to define and secure locations that may contain evidence, investigate and document the scene, gather physical evidence, and preserve, package, and submit the evidence to the laboratory for processing at a crime scene.
The investigator can attempt to reconstruct the aspects of the crime using these important pieces of evidence. The more thorough the crime scene crew is in its work, the more probable it is to get it right.
To learn more on Crime Scene, here:
https://brainly.com/question/5151126
#SPJ1
Explain the obligation and rights of employer and employees under the Employees Compensation Act 1923
The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 requires employers to provide benefits to employees who are injured or killed on the job.
The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 was enacted to compensate workers who were injured in the course of their employment due to an accident. It applies to all employees, including those who work part-time, temporarily, or casually.
This act assures that laborers' rights are protected even if they suffer disability or death as a result of an accident at work. The Act also includes provisions for medical and other benefits, such as reimbursement of medical expenses, provision of artificial limbs, and payment of a gratuity.
Therefore, the obligation and rights of employer and employees under the Employees Compensation Act 1923 is mentioned above.
To learn more on Employees Compensation Act, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30269394
#SPJ1
The legal system of the 1800s depended on testimony regarding physical evidence from scientists of what profession?
Answer:
Pathology is the study of the effects of disease on the body, while forensic pathology studies the disease of crime.
Explanation:
Quizlet yeah
Champion Hospital retains Hall, Hall and Hall, a law firm, to perform all of its legal work, including representation during medical malpractice lawsuits. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct? A) The law firm is not a business associate because it is a legal, not a medical, organization. B) The law firm is a business associate because it performs activities on behalf of the hospital. C) The law firm is a business associate because it uses or discloses individually identifiable health information on behalf of the hospital. D) The law firm is not a business associate because the privacy rule prohibits it from using individually identifiable information. E) a and d
B) The law firm is a business associate because it performs activities on behalf of the hospital. Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, a business associate is any person or organization that performs activities or functions on behalf of a covered entity (such as a hospital) that involve the use or disclosure of protected health information (PHI). As the law firm is performing legal work on behalf of the hospital, it meets the definition of a business associate.
In this scenario, Hall, Hall and Hall is a law firm retained by Champion Hospital to perform legal work, which involves the use or disclosure of PHI during medical malpractice lawsuits. Therefore, statement B is correct - the law firm is a business associate because it performs activities on behalf of the hospital that involve the use or disclosure of PHI. Statement A is incorrect because being a legal organization does not exempt the law firm from being considered a business associate. Statement C is correct because the use or disclosure of PHI is a key criterion for determining whether an entity is a business associate. Statement D is incorrect because the Privacy Rule does not prohibit law firms from using PHI, but it does require them to protect it appropriately. Statement E is incorrect because statement D is incorrect.
Learn more about business here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826771
#SPJ11
It is a federal crime to destroy documents that are involved in or could potentially be involved in either a civil or criminal investigation. Evaluate the criminal liability of Ann, her supervisor and the partner for the destruction of the documents. Would your answer be different if Ann had read in the newspaper about the criminal investigation of the company?
What factors discouraged the development of a multi-party system in the US?
In the United States, a multi-party system has not been able to develop due to several factors. The first factor is the country's electoral system. The US has a winner-takes-all system where the candidate who receives the highest number of votes in a given constituency wins the seat, which is not conducive to a multi-party system. This system has led to the domination of two major parties, namely the Democratic and Republican parties, who have a better chance of winning elections than smaller parties.
Another factor is the high cost of running political campaigns in the US. Running a political campaign requires significant financial resources, and small parties often do not have the necessary funds to compete against the established parties. The two major parties have also been able to gain support from wealthy donors, which further strengthens their hold on power.
Furthermore, the US has a strong two-party tradition that has been built over time. The two major parties have a long history and have been able to establish themselves as the dominant political forces in the country. This tradition has made it difficult for smaller parties to gain traction and establish themselves as viable alternatives.
Lastly, the media has played a significant role in discouraging the development of a multi-party system. The media tends to focus on the two major parties, giving them more coverage and exposure than smaller parties. This coverage can make it difficult for smaller parties to gain visibility and attract supporters.
In conclusion, several factors, including the country's electoral system, the high cost of running political campaigns, the strong two-party tradition, and the media's coverage of politics, have discouraged the development of a multi-party system in the US.
To know more about multi-party:
https://brainly.com/question/1083660
#SPJ11
during which step of the dfeh complaint process does the dfeh explore options to resolve a complaint after a violation of the law has been found?
Conciliation. The DFEH will attempt to address your complaint during conciliation by coming to a consensual settlement agreement with the employer. (This is exactly what happens once the EEOC determines Reasonable Cause in the EEOC complaint process.)
The CRD receives more complaints about workplace discrimination and harassment than any other issue, despite the California Labor Commissioner's Office hearing most disputes involving pay and hour claims. The FEHA forbids harassing a potential employee, employee, applicant, unpaid intern or volunteer, or contractor because of a protected class. All workplaces, even those with fewer than five employees, are prohibited from engaging in harassment.
To learn more about Conciliation, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28139060
#SPJ4
Which of the following actions is illegal for selling alcohol
Answer:
no options
Explanation:
A group of employees go on strike for one hour. The strike is not protected industrial
action. How much pay must the employees lose for the strike? Identify the relevant
section of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Under the Fair Work Act 2009, when employees engage in unprotected industrial action such as an unauthorized strike, they can face consequences including the loss of pay for the period of the strike.
Section 471 of the Fair Work Act 2009 states that when employees participate in unprotected industrial action, their employer has the right to deduct pay for the period of the strike. The deduction should reflect the amount the employees would have earned if they had worked during that time.
In the case of a one-hour strike, the employees would typically lose one hour's worth of pay. The specific amount deducted would depend on the employees' regular rate of pay, taking into account any applicable penalties, overtime rates, or other relevant factors determined by the applicable industrial instrument or employment agreement.
It is important to note that the Fair Work Act 2009 provides provisions for protected industrial action, which is lawful and provides certain protections for employees. However, when employees engage in unprotected industrial action, the employer has the right to take disciplinary actions, including the deduction of pay for the duration of the strike.
For more such questions on Fair Work Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30644627
#SPJ8
What is another name for the national government?
Answer:
Explanation:
National Government is just the government of a single country
Answer:
federal government is the answer
the minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the workers' adjustment retraining and notification act of 1989 is
The minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1989 (WARN Act) is 60 days.
The minimum advance notice of plant closings or layoffs affecting 50 or more full-time employees required by the Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act of 1989 is 60 days. The WARN Act is a labor law in the United States that provides job security to workers by requiring that companies give their employees sufficient notice before layoffs or plant closings.
When a covered employer terminates employment of 50 or more workers at a single site of employment, the employer must give at least 60 days’ notice to the affected employees. Employees who are separated from employment are entitled to certain notice obligations under the WARN Act. The WARN Act also applies to plant closings and mass layoffs that occur in stages over a period of time, rather than all at once.
Learn more about Workers' Adjustment Retraining and Notification (WARN) Act of 1988: https://brainly.com/question/31088800
#SPJ11
T/F. When managers attempt to spread authority widely in the lower levels of an organization, they are attempting to centralize authority.
False. When managers attempt to spread authority widely in the lower levels of an organization, they are attempting to decentralize authority.
Decentralization involves the distribution of decision-making authority and responsibility throughout an organization, with the goal of empowering lower-level employees and increasing their involvement in the decision-making process. By delegating decision-making authority to lower levels of the organization, managers can create a more responsive and adaptive organizational structure that can better address local needs and opportunities. In contrast, centralization involves concentrating decision-making authority at the top of the organization, which can result in a more bureaucratic and less flexible structure. Overall, decentralization is often seen as a means of improving organizational performance and increasing employee engagement and motivation.
Learn more about bureaucratic :
https://brainly.com/question/14346682
#SPJ4
Why am I not allowed to see answers to my question
Kim Buyer is purchasing a home. The purchase Price for the home is $125,000. Kim is obtaining a loan for acme loan company for $105,000. What is the amount of title insurance that Kim can purchase? What is the amount of title insurance the Acme loan company can purchase?
When purchasing a home is done by Kim at a cost of $125,000, and the loan is also taken by Kim at a rate of 8.4%, the total amount that was paid by Kim is $105,000.
What does loan mean?Giving money to someone else in exchange for repayment of the principal plus interest is known as a loan. Before agreeing to issue a loan to a potential borrower, lenders will take into account their income, credit score, and debt load.
Owner Kim is required to acquire $125,000 worth of title insurance because that is the exact price Kim paid for the property. The loan business set aside $105,000 for Kim when she applied for a loan, which is 8.4% less than the property's true value.
Learn more about loan from here:
https://brainly.com/question/11794123
#SPJ1
What is Just Desserts (the "justice" model)?
Answer:
"Just Desserts" is a theory of criminal punishment that emphasizes proportionality and retribution. According to this model, punishment should be proportionate to the harm caused by the crime and should be inflicted solely for the purpose of punishing the offender, rather than as a means of rehabilitation or deterrence.
In the "Just Desserts" model, offenders are held responsible for their actions and are punished in a manner that is commensurate with the severity of their crimes. The punishment is designed to balance the scales of justice and provide a sense of closure and satisfaction for victims and society as a whole.
Proponents of the "Just Desserts" model argue that it is a fair and just way to punish offenders, as it recognizes the harm that has been done and provides a tangible consequence for their actions. However, critics argue that this model is overly punitive and does not take into account the underlying causes of criminal behavior or the potential for rehabilitation. As a result, many justice systems have adopted a more balanced approach that incorporates elements of both punishment and rehabilitation.
Which of the following are local issues that escalated into national issues? how much time working parents need to have to care for their children not having anyone to take care of a new child in the family
how often trash pick-up should occur
not having rules or regulations set for using dog parks
how many people should be elected to the city council
Answer:
no idea. b
Explanation:
sorry i dont no
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Which of the following is NOT one of the four factors used by
arbitrators when deciding cases? a. The wording of the labor
agreement. b. Testimony and evidence offered during the hearing. c.
How manag
The factor that is NOT one of the four factors used by arbitrators when deciding cases is "c.
The wording of the labor agreement: Arbitrators carefully examine the language and terms of the labor agreement that is in dispute. They analyze the specific clauses, provisions, and terms mentioned in the agreement.
Testimony and evidence offered during the hearing: Arbitrators review the testimonies and evidence presented by both parties during the arbitration hearing. This may include witness statements, documents, and other relevant evidence.
Past practice and precedents: Arbitrators consider past practices and precedents established in similar cases or within the industry. They look for consistency and previous decisions that may have bearing on the current case.
Relevant laws and regulations: Arbitrators take into account applicable laws and regulations that govern the particular labor agreement or dispute. This ensures that the decision aligns with legal requirements.
However, "c. How manag" is not a recognized factor used by arbitrators when deciding cases. It seems that the question may have been cut off, but based on the provided options, "c. How manag" does not align with the typical factors considered by arbitrators.
To know more about arbitrators, visit:
brainly.com/question/33985273
#SPJ11
fines and demotions are examples of which type of reinforcement
Fines and demotions are examples of negative reinforcement. It involves the removal or avoidance of an aversive stimulus or punishment to increase the likelihood of a behavior being repeated.
Fines and demotions fall under negative reinforcement because they involve the removal or reduction of something negative or undesirable to reinforce a desired behavior. For instance, if an employee performs poorly and receives a demotion, the removal of responsibilities or privileges serves as negative reinforcement to motivate them to improve their performance.
Learn more about negative reinforcement here:
https://brainly.com/question/30089079
#SPJ4