What are 3 techniques for pathos?

A wrong that arises from a violation of a private duty is called a tort. A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to someone and gives them the right to sue for damages.

Private duties can arise from various relationships, such as employer-employee, doctor-patient, or landlord-tenant. Examples of torts arising from a violation of private duties include negligence, breach of contract, and defamation. Negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care, and their actions or inaction cause harm to another person. Breach of contract occurs when one party fails to fulfill their obligations under a contract, causing harm to the other party. Defamation occurs when someone makes false and harmful statements about another person, causing damage to their reputation.

To learn more about violation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19271039

#SPJ11

When an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, he/she is prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases.

Divorce attorneys are prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases due to potential conflicts of interest. The lawyer, after representing one party, is no longer in a position to represent the other party impartially. This is to prevent any bias or conflict of interest that may affect the case's outcome negatively.A conflict of interest is a scenario where an attorney may not represent both parties in the same legal matter or similar legal matters, regardless of the type of case.

For instance, a lawyer representing a client in a divorce case cannot represent either of the former partners in a child custody case or any other family law case where there is a potential conflict of interest.In summary, if an attorney represents a party in a divorce mediation process, they are prevented from representing either party in future family-related cases.

To know more about mediation click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30783013

#SPJ11

Answer:

It can lead to addiction. If drinking then it will be hard to leave you would always be drunk and if you take drugs then you will become an addict

Answer:

C

Explanation:

If a person fails to claim depreciation, the most important consequence is that he lose the greatest tax benefit.

If a person has claimed incorrect amount of depreciation he can do the catchup adjustment, in order to correct the improper depreciation in the previous years.

Even if, the taxpayer has failed to claim depreciation entirely, he can do the following:

1) File an amended return.

2) The taxpayer can increase the basis of the property by the amount of depreciation that should have been claimed.

3) He/she can file form 3155 to change the accounting policy.

4) In the current year, he can file form 4562 to include the unclaimed depreciation in this year.

To know more about depreciation: https://brainly.com/question/28588335

One of the senders—great looks, hot trends, or ilene—is acting outside the bounds of federal law. Federal law prohibits the sending of: commercial e-mail to randomly generated addresses.

This is the term that is used to refer to the law that the government of a place would put in place that outlaws certain activities and practices by the people in an area.

The government has the prohibition that stops businesses and persons from having to randomly generate the email addresses of people and then sending them unsolicited emails.

Hence we can say that One of the senders—great looks, hot trends, or ilene—is acting outside the bounds of federal law. Federal law prohibits the sending of: commercial e-mail to randomly generated addresses.

Read more on federal prohibitions here:

https://brainly.com/question/12486518

#SPJ1

Answer:

Lobbyists help inform Congress and the public about problems and issues. Lobbyists provide technical information about legislative proposals. And lobbyists let lawmakers know whom a bill would help and whom it would hurt.

Explanation:

Answer:

What is the difference between ethical behavior and legal behavior?

The distinction is important. Actions are 'legal' if they do not violate the laws or codes of the local government, state, or federal government. ... A formally adopted code of ethics is a legal requirement; when you violate a state or local government code of ethics there are specific consequences.

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The word corspe is derived from corpus, in Latin it means "body of defense".

The answer to the problem is A. Bill of Rights.

The Bill of rights are the first ten amendments in the constitution, then follows the other amendments the constitution holds.

Hi there! The answer is: option A.

The Bill of Rights and the amendments create the Constitution. In line IX of the Constitution, it states that "The Bill of Rights and amendments." The answer is option A.

As a judge in France, Maurice is not allowed to interpret the law but relies on a strict set of codes to determine the outcome of a case. A type of law that is in place in France is known as civil law system. The Option B is correct.

Civil law systems, also known as continental or Romano-Germanic legal systems, are found on all continents and cover approximately 60% of the global territory. They are based on Roman law concepts, categories, and rules, with some influence from canon law, and are sometimes supplemented or modified by local custom or culture.

The civil law tradition, despite being secularized over the centuries and emphasizing individual freedom, promotes human cooperation. Civil law, in its technical, narrow sense, refers to the law that governs people, things, and the relationships that develop between them, excluding not only criminal law but also commercial law, labor law, and so on.

Read more about civil law system

brainly.com/question/15049771

#SPJ1

True, having control over how much money is spent, otherwise known as budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy. This is because the governor can allocate funds to specific programs or agencies, prioritize certain projects, and potentially veto budget items, thereby shaping policy outcomes.

What is budgetary powers?

Budgetary powers refer to the authority and responsibility to create, allocate, and manage financial resources within an organization or government. In the context of government, budgetary powers typically involve the creation and management of the national or local budget, which outlines the expected revenues and expenditures for a given period.

The government's budgetary powers also include the ability to prioritize spending on different areas such as health care, education, defense, infrastructure, etc. This involves making decisions on how much money to allocate to each area, and determining which programs or projects should receive funding.

To know more about Budgetary powers:

https://brainly.com/question/31067316

#SPJ11

True, having control over how much money is spent, or budgetary powers, allows the governor to exert influence over state policy.

Budgetary powers give the governor the authority to allocate funds for various programs and projects within the state, thus shaping policy priorities. By adjusting funding levels, the governor can promote certain initiatives or discourage others, ultimately influencing the direction of state policy.

Additionally, the governor's involvement in the budget process often requires negotiation with state legislators, which further emphasizes the significance of these powers in shaping policy outcomes. Overall, budgetary powers serve as an essential tool for the governor to guide and impact state policy.

To know more about state policy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1875331

#SPJ11

The law that is being asked about here is the Pet Purchase Protection Law, also known as the "Puppy Lemon Law". It is a purchaser protection law that was enacted to provide legal recourse to people who bought animals from dealers that were later found to have disease or defect.

This purchaser protection legislations are currently in place in 22 U.S. states for the exact reason that their names suggest, and that is to safeguard the pet owner.

A typical Pet Purchaser Protection Act gives the fur parents a right of redress if they purchase an animal with a disease or defect from the seller while also requiring the seller to make specific disclosures regarding the animal that is being put on the market.

Discover why owning a pet from the pound or Animal Rescue League has many advantages: https://brainly.com/question/11899645

#SPJ4

Answer:

False is the answer of this question

Answer:

Explanation:

It is difficult to say whether Shakila can successfully sue Hospital Suredie and Dr. Quack for negligence without more information about the specific circumstances of the case and the laws in the jurisdiction in which the incident occurred.

In general, for a negligence case to be successful, it must be proven that the defendants had a duty of care to the patient, that this duty of care was breached, and that this breach caused harm to the patient.

In this case, it could be argued that the hospital and Dr. Quack had a duty of care to David as a patient seeking medical treatment. However, it is also stated that there was no doctor on duty and the cause of death was diagnosed as a chronic disease and he would have died anyway, even if Dr. Quack had treated him. This information suggests that the death may not have been preventable and that there may not have been a breach of the duty of care.

It would be advisable for Shakila to consult with a lawyer experienced in medical malpractice cases to determine the specific laws and regulations that may apply in her case and to evaluate the strength of her potential legal claim.

A complaint specifies the factual and legal basis for the lawsuit and the relief the plaintiff seeks.

The correct option is Option C.

Any civil case starts with pleading only after a complaint is first filed.

A complaint is in essence a document that puts forth the jurisdictional basis for the plaintiff's cause of action and a demand for relief from the judiciary.

A complaint must include a complete list of the plaintiff's allegations against the respondent as well as the specific relief the plaintiff is looking for. The defendant shall file an answer within ten (10) days after receipt of the complaint.

Traditionally, complaints did not have to be highly precise or state the facts the plaintiff intended to establish in accordance with the federal courts' notice pleading system. 

Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, a case decided by the Supreme Court in 2007, raised the bar for complaints. A complaint must, according to this ruling, contain "enough facts to make a claim to relief that is believable on its face.

To know more about complaint , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14620734

#SPJ4

Answer:

b which is concurrent jurisdiction

Answer:

The legislative procedure comprises three main phases: the tabling of the text, its examination by the Parliament and its promulgation by the President of the Republic (after a possible referral to the Constitutional Council for examination of the conformity of the text with the Constitution).

A bill goes through all stages of the legislative process through "a long series of standard motions" on which the House must vote favorably before the bill can become law. [123].

Explanation:

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

The answer would be true

Answer:

1. C

2. B

3. D

4. A

5. C

6. C

7. B

8. C

9. A

10. D

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

Government and politics are two interrelated terms in social science. Government refers to a group of authorized people who govern a country or state at a given time. Politics refer to the process used by the government to govern the country or state. Government mainly refers to a select group of people whereas politics refer to a process.

In the history of slavery in the English Atlantic region, Barbados was a key player. It was one of the most lucrative and largely enslaved colonies in the Caribbean and the first English colony there.

A little island country called Barbados can be found in the eastern Caribbean Sea. Since the English originally colonised it in 1627, it has had a huge impact on the history of the Caribbean and the entire world. Barbados is renowned for its stunning beaches, extensive cultural history, and dynamic calypso and soca music and dance traditions. The island enjoys a high quality of living compared to many other Caribbean countries, and its economy is primarily based on offshore financial services and tourism. Barbados' complicated history of colonisation, slavery, and resistance has had a long-lasting influence on its society and culture.

Learn more about Barbados here:

https://brainly.com/question/12758487

#SPJ4

A judge has dismissed charges against seven people in the Flint water scandal, including two former state health officials blamed for deaths from Legionnaires' disease. FILE - The Flint water plant tower is seen on Jan. 6, 2022, in Flint, Mich.

Scandal is a term used to describe dishonourable, shameful, or demeaning actions or conduct that causes shame to a person or society at large. Any false information, harmful rumour, or gossip, particularly slander that harms someone's reputation or character, can fall under this category.

Any individual who disturbs or embarrasses others in public while intoxicated or otherwise, provided that the circumstances do not make the prohibitions of Article 153 relevant.

A scandal is generally understood to be the significant social reactions of outrage, fury, or surprise that arise when rumours or charges about a person or people who are thought to have violated some rule spread or appear for whatever reason.

To learn more about scandal visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3872181

#SPJ13

Explanation:

They should do every thing like starting indrusties, making houses, or apartments, giveing people jobs so they should be employedand more.Amd start trading

.......

But should not start deforestation in South Africa

Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.

One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.

Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.

Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.

Answer:

I don't know but it sounds interesting

Explanation: